[1]
A Theory of Digital Objects: 2010. http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3033/2564.
[2]
Abram, D. 1996. Philosophy on the way to ecology: a technical introduction to the inquiry. The spell of the sensuous: perception and language in a more-than-human world. Vintage Books. 31–72.
[3]
Abstraction and Decontextualisation or E for Ethnography: 2000. http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm.
[4]
Adams, P.C. et al. 2001. Textures of place: exploring humanist geographies. University of Minnesota Press.
[5]
Appadurai, A. 1990. Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Theory, Culture & Society. 7, 2 (Jun. 1990), 295–310. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/026327690007002017.
[6]
Arjun Appadurai 1996. Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press. 27–44.
[7]
Bachelard, G. 1994. The poetics of space. Beacon Press.
[8]
Barendregt, B. 2008. Sex, Cannibals, and the Language of Cool: Indonesian Tales of the Phone and Modernity. The Information Society. 24, 3 (May 2008), 160–170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240802020044.
[9]
Benjamin, W. 1936. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. (1936).
[10]
Benjamin, W. and Tiedemann, R. 2002. The arcades project. Belknap Press.
[11]
Bennett, T. 1995. The birth of the museum: history, theory, politics. Routledge.
[12]
Bessire, L. and Bond, D. 2014. Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. American Ethnologist. 41, 3 (Aug. 2014), 440–456. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/amet.12083.
[13]
Binkley, S. 2000. Kitsch as a Repetitive System: A Problem for the Theory of Taste Hierarchy. Journal of Material Culture. 5, 2 (Jul. 2000), 131–152. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/135918350000500201.
[14]
Blier, S.P. 1987. The anatomy of architecture: ontology and metaphor in Batammaliba architectural expression. Cambridge University Press.
[15]
Bloch, M. 1995. The resurrection of the house amongst the Zafimaniry of Madagascar. About the house: Lévi-Strauss and beyond. Cambridge University Press. 69–83.
[16]
Bloch, M. and Association of Social Anthropologists of the Commonwealth 1975. Marxist analyses and social anthropology. Malaby Press.
[17]
Boivin, N. 2008. Material cultures, material minds: the impact of things on human thought, society, and evolution. Cambridge University Press.
[18]
Bourdieu, P. 1984. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[19]
Bourdieu, P. 1970. The Berber house or the world reversed. Social Science Information. 9, 2 (1970), 151–170. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/053901847000900213.
[20]
Boylan, A.L. 2011. Thomas Kinkade: the artist in the mall. Duke University Press.
[21]
British Academy Proceedings of the British Academy. 123–147.
[22]
Brunette, P. 1996. Open City (1945). Roberto Rossellini. University of California Press. 41–60.
[23]
Buchli, V. 1999. An archaeology of socialism. Berg Publishers.
[24]
Buchli, V. 2002. Architecture and the domestic sphere. The material culture reader. Berg. 207–213.
[25]
Buchli, V. 2002. The material culture reader. Berg.
[26]
Buchli, V. 2002. The material culture reader. Berg.
[27]
Buchli, V. and Lucas, G. 2001. ‘The archaeology of alienation: a late twentieth century British council house’. Archaeologies of the contemporary past. Routledge.
[28]
Buchli, V. and Lucas, G. 2001. The Archaeology of Alienation: a late twentieth-century British Council Flat. Archaeologies of the contemporary past. Routledge.
[29]
Campbell, S. 2001. The Captivating Agency of Art: many Ways of Seeing. Beyond aesthetics: art and the technologies of enchantment. Berg.
[30]
Carl Knappett 2002. Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object. Journal of Material Culture. 7, 1 (Mar. 2002), 97–117. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183502007001307.
[31]
Carsten, J. 2003. Houses of Memory and Kinship. After Kinship. Cambridge University Press. 31–56.
[32]
Casey, E.S. 2009. Getting back into place: toward a renewed understanding of the place-world. Indiana University Press.
[33]
Casey, E.S. 1996. How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: phenomenological prolegomena. Senses of place. School of American Research Press. 13–52.
[34]
Certeau, M. de et al. 2014. Practice of Everyday Life: Volume 2: Living and Cooking. University of Minnesota Press.
[35]
Chaplin, E. 1994. The use of visual representation in anthropology and sociology. Sociology and visual representation. Routledge.
[36]
Chevalier, S. 1997. ‘From woollen carpet to grass carpet: bridging house and garden in an English suburb’. Material cultures: why some things matter. University College London Press.
[37]
Chevalier, S. 1997. From woollen carpet to grass carpet: bridging house and garden in an English suburb. Material cultures: why some things matter. University College London Press.
[38]
Christopher Norris 1988. De Man and the Critique of Romantic Ideology. Paul de Man: deconstruction and the critique of aesthetic ideology. Routledge. 28–64.
[39]
Christopher, Tilley 1990. Claude Levi Strauss: structuralism and beyond. Reading material culture: structuralism, hermeneutics and post-structuralism. Basil Blackwell. 3–80.
[40]
Cieraad, I. 1999. At home: an anthropology of domestic space. Syracuse University Press.
[41]
Claire, Jacobson, and Brooke, Grundfest, Schoepf 1963. Split representation in the Art of Asia and America. Structural anthropology. Basic Books. 245–266.
[42]
Claude Lévi-Strauss 1982. The Salish Swaihwe. The way of the masks. University of Washington Press. 15–39.
[43]
Clifford, J. 1988. On collecting art and culture (chapter 10). The predicament of culture: twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Harvard University Press. 215–251.
[44]
Colomina, B. and Bloomer, J. 1992. Sexuality & space. Princeton Architectural Press.
[45]
Conkey, M. 2006. Style, Design and Function. Handbook of material culture. SAGE. 355–372.
[46]
Coupaye, L. 2013. Growing artefacts, displaying relationships: yams, art and technology amongst the Nyamikum Abelam of Papua New Guinea. Berghahn Books.
[47]
Coupaye, L. 2009. Ways of Enchanting: Chaines Operatoires and Yam Cultivation in Nyamikum Village, Maprik, Papua New Guinea. Journal of Material Culture. 14, 4 (Dec. 2009), 433–458. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183509345945.
[48]
Csáky, M. 1979. How does it feel? Exploring the world of your senses. Thames and Hudson.
[49]
Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Halton, E. 1981. The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge University Press.
[50]
Cullens, C. 1999. Gimme Shelter: At Home with the Millennium . Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies. 11, 2 (1999), 204–227.
[51]
Dant, T. 2014. True Automobility. Objects and materials: a Routledge companion. Routledge.
[52]
Deger, J. 2006. Shimmering screens: making media in an aboriginal community. University of Minnesota Press.
[53]
Derrida, J. 1997. Writing and Man’s Exploitation by Man. Of grammatology. Johns Hopkins University Press. 118–140.
[54]
Drazin, A. 2013. The Social Life of Concepts in Design Anthropology. Design anthropology: theory and practice. W. Gunn and R.C. Smith, eds. Bloomsbury. 33–50.
[55]
Drazin, A. and Roberts, S. 2009. Exploring Design Dialogues for Ageing in Place. Anthropology in Action. 16, 1 (2009), 72–88. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2009.160107.
[56]
Elster, J. 1986. An Introduction to Karl Marx. Cambridge University Press.
[57]
Fabian, J. 2002. Time and the other: how anthropology makes its object. Columbia University Press.
[58]
Fehervary, K. 2001. American Kitchens, Luxury Bathrooms, and the Search for a ‘Normal’ Life in Postsocialist Hungary. Ethnos. 67, 3 (Nov. 2001), 369–400. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0014184022000031211.
[59]
Fernandez, J. 1977. Fang Architectonics.
[60]
Flynn, D. 2009. My Customers are Different! Identity, Difference, and the Political Economy of Design. Ethnography and the corporate encounter: reflections on research in and of corporations. Berghahn Books.
[61]
Forge, A. 1973. Style and Meaning in Sepik Art. Primitive art & society. Oxford University Press for the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research.
[62]
Fortis, P. 2012. Kuna art and Shamanism: an ethnographic approach. University of Texas Press.
[63]
Fortis, P. 2010. The birth of design: a Kuna theory of body and personhood. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 16, 3 (Aug. 2010), 480–495. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01635.x.
[64]
Foster, J.B. 2000. Marx’s ecology: materialism and nature. Monthly Review Press.
[65]
Foucault, M. 1995. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Vintage Books.
[66]
Foucault, M. 1991. Space, knowledge and power. The Foucault reader. Penguin. 239–256.
[67]
Frankel, D. 1978. Pottery decoration as an indicator of social relationships: a prehistoric Cypriot example’. Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics. Duckworth.
[68]
Frascara, J. 2002. Design and the social sciences: making connections. Taylor & Francis.
[69]
Froud, D. 2004. Thinking Beyond the Homely: Countryside Properties and the Shape of Time. Home Cultures. 1, 3 (Nov. 2004), 211–233. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2752/174063104778053473.
[70]
Froud, D. 2004. Thinking Beyond the Homely: Countryside Properties and the Shape of Time. Home Cultures. 1, 3 (Nov. 2004), 211–233. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2752/174063104778053473.
[71]
Fulton Suri, J. 2011. Poetic Observation: What Designers Make of What They See. Design anthropology: object culture in the 21st century. A.J. Clarke, ed. Springer. 16–32.
[72]
Garvey, P. 2001. Organized Disorder: Moving furniture in Norwegian Homes. Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. D. Miller, ed. Berg. 47–68.
[73]
Geismar, H. 2001. What’s in a Price?: An Ethnography of Tribal Art at Auction. Journal of Material Culture. 6, 1 (Mar. 2001), 25–47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/135918350100600102.
[74]
Gell, A. 1998. ‘9.6 The Maori meeting house’. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Clarendon Press. 251–258.
[75]
Gell, A. 1998. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Clarendon Press.
[76]
Gell, A. 1975. Metamorphosis of the cassowaries: Umeda society, language and ritual. Athlone Press.
[77]
Gell, A. 1998. Style and culture (Chapter 8). Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Clarendon Press.
[78]
Gell, A. 1998. Style and Culture (chapter 8). Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Clarendon Press. 155–215.
[79]
Gell, A. 1992. The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Berg.
[80]
Gell, A. 2006. The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology. The art of anthropology: essays and diagrams. Berg. 159–186.
[81]
Gell, A. 1993. Wrapping in images: tattooing in Polynesia. Clarendon Press.
[82]
Gell, A. and Hirsch, E. 2006. The art of anthropology: essays and diagrams. Berg.
[83]
Gell, A. and Kokuritsu Minzokugaku Hakubutsukan 1998. Time and social anthropology. Senri Ethnological Studies. 45, (1998).
[84]
Ginsburg, F. 1994. Culture / Media: A Mild Polemic. Anthropology Today. 10, 2 (1994), 5–15.
[85]
Gledhill, J. 2000. Power and its disguises: anthropological perspectives on politics. Pluto Press.
[86]
Gullestad, M. 1984. Hearth and home. Kitchen-table society: a case study of the family life and friendships of young working-class mothers in urban Norway. Distribution in United States and Canada, Columbia University Press.
[87]
Haddon, L. Domestication and Mobile Telephony. Machines That Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology. Transaction Publishers.
[88]
Hallam, E. and Hockey, J.L. 2001. Death, memory and material culture. Berg.
[89]
Hammond, M. et al. 1991. Understanding phenomenology. Basil Blackwell.
[90]
Harvey, P. and Knox, H. 2014. ‘Introduction’ in Objects and materials: a Routledge companion. Objects and materials: a Routledge companion. Routledge.
[91]
Hayden, D. 1981. The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. MIT Press.
[92]
Helliwell, C. 1996. Space and sociality in a Dayak longhouse. Things as they are: new directions in phenomenological anthropology. Indiana University Press. 128–148.
[93]
Helliwell, C. 1996. Space and sociality in a Dayak longhouse. Things as they are: new directions in phenomenological anthropology. Indiana University Press.
[94]
Hevia, J.L. 1992. History, Theory, and Colonial Power: The Critical Method of Michael Taussig in Shamanism, Colonialism, and The Wild Man. Journal of Historical Sociology. 5, 1 (Mar. 1992), 104–125. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6443.1992.tb00025.x.
[95]
Heyman, J.McC. and Campbell, H. 2009. The anthropology of global flows: A critical reading of Appadurai’s `Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy’. Anthropological Theory. 9, 2 (Jun. 2009), 131–148. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499609105474.
[96]
Hicks, D. and Beaudry, M.C. 2010. The Oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford University Press.
[97]
Hinsley, C.M. 1991. The world as marketplace: commodification of the exotic at the world’s Columbian exhibition (chapter 18). Exhibiting cultures: the poetics and politics of museum display. Smithsonian Institution Press. 344–363.
[98]
Hodder, I. 2011. Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 17, 1 (Mar. 2011), 154–177. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x.
[99]
Holbraad, M. et al. The Politics of Ontology: Anthropological Positions. Cultural anthropology journal of the Society for Cultural Anthropology.
[100]
Horst, H. and Miller, D. 2005. From kinship to link‐up: cell phones and social networking in Jamaica. Current Anthropology. 46, 5 (Dec. 2005), 755–778.
[101]
Horst, H.A. 2006. The blessings and burdens of communication: cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global Networks. 6, 2 (Apr. 2006), 143–159. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00138.x.
[102]
Horst, H.A. and Miller, D. 2006. The cell phone: an anthropology of communication. Berg.
[103]
Hui, Y. 2012. What is a Digital Object? Metaphilosophy. 43, 4 (Jul. 2012), 380–395. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x.
[104]
Humphrey, C. 1974. Inside a Mongolian tent. New society. 30, 630 (1974), 273–275.
[105]
Ingold, T. 2007. Anthropology is Not Ethnography. Proceedings of the British Academy. 69–92.
[106]
Ingold, T. 1986. Evolution and social life. Cambridge University Press.
[107]
Ingold, T. 2000. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge.
[108]
Jay, M. 1994. Martin Jay Replies to Michael Taussig and Paul Stoller. Visual Anthropology Review. 10, 1 (Mar. 1994), 163–164. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1525/var.1994.10.1.163.
[109]
Jay, M. 1993. Unsympathetic Magic:Nervous System. Visual Anthropology Review. 9, 2 (Sep. 1993), 79–82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1525/var.1993.9.2.79.
[110]
Kockelman, P. 2013. The anthropology of an equation. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. 3, 3 (Dec. 2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.14318/hau3.3.003.
[111]
Korn, S.M. 1978. The formal analysis of visual systems as exemplified by a study of the Abelam (Papua New Guinea) paintings’. Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics. Duckworth.
[112]
Latour, B. 1991. Technology is Society Made Durable. A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination. Routledge. 103–113.
[113]
Latour, B. What is Iconoclash ? or Is there a world beyond the image wars? Horizontes antropológicos. 14, 29, 110–150.
[114]
Lemonnier, P. 2002. From Field to Files: Description and Analysis of Technical Phenomena. Elements for an Anthropology of Technology. University of Michigan Press. 25–50.
[115]
Lemonnier, P. 2012. Mundane objects: materiality and non-verbal communication. Left Coast.
[116]
Lévi-Strauss, C. 2006. Split representation in the Art of Asia and America. The anthropology of art: a reader. Blackwell.
[117]
Losche, D. 1995. THE SEPIK GAZE: Iconographic Interpretation of Abelam Form. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice. 38 (1995), 47–60.
[118]
Low, S.M. and Lawrence-Zúñiga, D. 2003. The anthropology of space and place: locating culture. Blackwell.
[119]
MacDougall, D. 1999. The Visual in Anthropology. Rethinking visual anthropology. Yale University Press. 276–295.
[120]
Madison, G.B. 1981. The phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty: a search for the limits of consciousness. Ohio University Press.
[121]
Marcoux, J.-S. 2004. Body Exchanges: Material Culture, Gender and Stereotypes in the Making. Home Cultures. 1, 1 (Mar. 2004), 51–60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2752/174063104778053608.
[122]
Marcoux, J.-S. 2001. The ‘Casser Maison’ Ritual: Constructing the Self by Emptying the Home. Journal of Material Culture. 6, 2 (Jul. 2001), 213–235. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/135918350100600205.
[123]
Martin, J. 1988. Scopic Regimes of Modernity. Vision and visuality. Bay Press. 3–21.
[124]
Martinon-Torres, M. 2002. Chaîne Opératoire: The Concept and Its Applications Within the Study of Technology. Gallaecia. 21, (2002), 29–43.
[125]
Maurice Merleau-Ponty 2012. Phenomenology of perception. Routledge.
[126]
McCraken, G. 1989. Homeyness - a cultural account of one constellation of consumer goods and meanings. Interpretive consumer research. Association for Consumer Research. 168–183.
[127]
Mcintosh, J. 2010. Mobile phones and Mipoho’s prophecy: The powers and dangers of flying language. American Ethnologist. 37, 2 (May 2010), 337–353. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01259.x.
[128]
Mellstrom, U. 2009. The Intersection of Gender, Race and Cultural Boundaries, or Why is Computer Science in Malaysia Dominated by Women? Social Studies of Science. 39, 6 (2009), 885–907. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312709334636.
[129]
Miller, D. 2005. A materialist approach to materiality. Materiality. Duke University Press. 72–87.
[130]
Miller, D. 1988. Appropriating the state on the council estate. Man. 23, 2 (1988), 353–372. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2802810.
[131]
Miller, D. 2001. Behind closed doors. Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Berg. 1–19.
[132]
Miller, D. 2001. Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Berg.
[133]
Miller, D. 1997. Material cultures: why some things matter. University College London Press.
[134]
Mintz, S.W. 1986. Sweetness and power: the place of sugar in modern history. Penguin Books.
[135]
Mintz, S.W. 1986. Sweetness and power: the place of sugar in modern history. Penguin Books.
[136]
Morphy, H. 2009. Art as a Mode of Action: Some Problems with Gell’s Art and Agency. Journal of Material Culture. 14, 1 (Mar. 2009), 5–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183508100006.
[137]
Morris, R.C. 2007. Legacies of Derrida: Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 36, 1 (Sep. 2007), 355–389. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094357.
[138]
Nafus, D. and Anderson, K. 2009. Writing on Walls: the materiality of social memory in corporate research. Ethnography and the corporate encounter : reflections on research in and of corporations. M. Cefkin, ed. Berghahn Books. 137–157.
[139]
Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity: 1992. http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law1992NotesOnTheTheoryOfTheActorNetwork.pdf.
[140]
Olsen, B. 2010. In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
[141]
Peter Brunette and David Wills 1994. Introduction: The spatial arts : an interview with Jacques Derrida. Deconstruction and the visual arts: art, media, architecture. Cambridge University Press.
[142]
Peter Brunette and David Wills 1989. The Frame of the Frame. Screen/play: Derrida and film theory. Princeton University Press. 99–138.
[143]
Pfaff, J. 2010. A mobile phone: mobility, materiality and everyday Swahili trading practices. Cultural Geographies. 17, 3 (Jul. 2010), 341–357. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474010368606.
[144]
Pinney, C. 1997. Camera Indica: the social life of Indian photographs. Reaktion Books.
[145]
Pinney, C. 2011. Photography and anthropology. Reaktion.
[146]
Pinney, C. and Thomas, N. 2001. Beyond aesthetics: art and the technologies of enchantment. Berg.
[147]
Prussin, L. 1996. When Nomads settle: Changing Technologies of Building and Transport and the Production of Architectural Form among the Gabra. African material culture. Indiana University Press. 73–102.
[148]
Putnam, T. and Newton, C. 1990. Household choices. Futures.
[149]
Rampley, M. 2005. Art history and cultural difference: Alfred Gell’s anthropology of art. Art History. 28, 4 (Sep. 2005), 524–551. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.2005.00475.x.
[150]
Reichard, G.A. 1969. Melanesian design: a study of style in wood and tortoiseshell carving. AMS Press.
[151]
Reimer, S. and Leslie, D. 2004. Identity, Consumption, and the Home. Home Cultures. 1, 2 (Jul. 2004), 187–208. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2752/174063104778053536.
[152]
Rivière, P. 1995. Houses, places and people: community and continuity in Guiana. About the house: Lévi-Strauss and beyond. Cambridge University Press. 189–205.
[153]
Roaf, M. 1978. A mathematical analysis of the styles of the Persepolis reliefs’. Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics. Duckworth.
[154]
Roseberry, W. 1989. Anthropologies and histories: essays in culture, history, and political economy. Rutgers University Press.
[155]
Roseberry, W. 1997. MARX AND ANTHROPOLOGY. Annual Review of Anthropology. 26, 1 (Oct. 1997), 25–46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.25.
[156]
Roseberry, W. 1996. The Rise of Yuppie Coffees and the Reimagination of Class in the United States. American Anthropologist. 98, 4 (1996), 762–775.
[157]
Ross, P. 2010. Problematizing the user in user-centered production: A new media lab meets its audiences. Social Studies of Science. 41, 2 (2010), 251–270. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710385851.
[158]
Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design (Hardback) - Routledge: 2012. http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415694407/.
[159]
Rowlands, M. 2005. A materialist approach to materiality.
[160]
Ruby, J. 2000. Picturing culture: explorations of film & anthropology. University of Chicago Press.
[161]
Ruppert, E. et al. 2013. Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices. Theory, Culture & Society. 30, 4 (Jul. 2013), 22–46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413484941.
[162]
Sanders, J. 1996. Stud: architectures of masculinity. Princeton Architectural Press.
[163]
Scheper‐Hughes, N. 2000. The global traffic in human organs. Current Anthropology. 41, 2 (Apr. 2000). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/300123.
[164]
Schüll, N.D. 2012. Addiction by design: machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton University Press.
[165]
Silverstone, R. 1997. Visions of suburbia. Routledge.
[166]
Spain, D. 1992. Gendered spaces. University of North Carolina Press.
[167]
Sperber, D. Claude Levi-Strauss. Structuralism and since: from Lévi-Strauss to Derrida. Oxford University Press. 19–51.
[168]
Squires, S.E. and Byrne, B. 2002. Creating breakthrough ideas: the collaboration of anthropologists and designers in the product development industry. Bergin & Garvey.
[169]
Stammler, F.M. 2009. Mobile Phone Revolution in the Tundra? Technological Change among Russian Reindeer Nomads. Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore. 41, (2009), 47–78. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2009.41.stammler.
[170]
Sterne, J. 2006. The mp3 as cultural artifact. New Media & Society. 8, 5 (Oct. 2006), 825–842. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444806067737.
[171]
Sturrock, J. 2003. Social Sciences. Structuralism. Blackwell Pub. 48–73.
[172]
Suchman, L. 2011. Anthropological Relocations and the Limits of Design. Annual Review of Anthropology. 40, 1 (2011), 1–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.041608.105640.
[173]
Suchman, L. 2008. Feminist STS and the Sciences of the Artificial. The handbook of science and technology studies. MIT Press. 139–165.
[174]
Susan Orlean 2001. Art for Everybody. (2001).
[175]
Taussig, M. 1994. Michael Taussig Replies to Martin Jay. Visual Anthropology Review. 10, 1 (Mar. 1994), 154–154. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1525/var.1994.10.1.154.
[176]
Taussig, M. 2008. Redeeming Indigo. Theory, Culture & Society. 25, 3 (May 2008), 1–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276408090655.
[177]
Taussig, M.T. 2012. Beauty and the beast. University of Chicago Press.
[178]
Taussig, M.T. 1993. Mimesis and alterity: a particular history of the senses. Routledge.
[179]
Tenhunen, S. 2008. Mobile technology in the village: ICTs, culture, and social logistics in India. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 14, 3 (Sep. 2008), 515–534. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00515.x.
[180]
The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process: 1986. http://web-facstaff.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Kopytoff_CulturalBiography.pdf.
[181]
Thomas, J. 1996. Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. Routledge.
[182]
Tilley, C. 2001. Ethnography and Material Culture. Handbook of ethnography / edited by Paul Atkinson ... [et al.].
[183]
Tilley, C. 2006. Objectification. Handbook of material culture. SAGE. 60–73.
[184]
Tilley, C.Y. 2006. Handbook of material culture. SAGE.
[185]
Tilley, C.Y. 1992. Social values, social constraints and material culture: the design of contemporary beer cans. Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. Routledge.
[186]
Tilley, C.Y. 1994. Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives. A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Berg. 7–34.
[187]
Tim Ingold 2007. Lines: a brief history. Routledge.
[188]
Tim Ingold 2000. Making culture and weaving the world: Artefacts and organisms. Matter, materiality and modern culture. Routledge. 50–71.
[189]
Tim Ingold 2000. Of string bags and bird’s nests. Skill and the construction of artefacts. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge. 349–361.
[190]
Tunstall, D. 2013. Decolonizing Design Innovation: Design Anthropology, Critical Anthropology, and Indigenous Knowledge. Design anthropology: theory and practice. W. Gunn and R.C. Smith, eds. Bloomsbury. 232–250.
[191]
Victor Buchli 1999. An archaeology of socialism. Berg Publishers.
[192]
Viseu, A. and Suchman, L. 2010. Wearable Augmentation: Imaginaries of the Informed Body. Technologized images, technologized bodies. Berghahn Books.
[193]
Viveiros de Castro, E. 2004. Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation. Tipití - Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America. 2, 1 (2004), 3–22.
[194]
Warnier, J.-P. 2001. A Praxeological Approach to Subjectivation in a Material World. Journal of Material Culture. 6, 1 (Mar. 2001), 5–24. DOI:https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/135918350100600101.
[195]
Washburn, D.K. and Crowe, D.W. 1988. Symmetries of culture: theory and practice of plane pattern analysis. University of Washington Press.
[196]
Weiner, J.F. 2001. Tree leaf talk: a Heideggerian anthropology. Berg.
[197]
Weiss, G. and Haber, H.F. 1999. Perspectives on embodiment: the intersections of nature and culture. Routledge.
[198]
Wolf, E.R. 1999. Envisioning power: ideologies of dominance and crisis. University of California Press.
[199]
Wolf, E.R. 2010. Europe and the people without history. University of California Press.
[200]
Wolf, E.R. and Silverman, S. 2001. Pathways of power: building an anthropology of the modern world. University of California Press.
[201]
Wolf, E.R. and Silverman, S. 2001. Pathways of power: building an anthropology of the modern world. University of California Press.
[202]
Wright, C. 1998. The Third Subject: Perspectives on Visual Anthropology. Anthropology Today. 14, 4 (1998), 16–22.
[203]
Wypijewski, J. et al. 1997. Painting by numbers: Komar and Melamid’s scientific guide to art. Farrar Straus Giroux.
[204]
Young, D.J.B. 2004. The Material Value of Color: The Estate Agent’s Tale. Home Cultures. 1, 1 (2004), 5–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2752/174063104778053572.
