1
Buchli V. The material culture reader. Oxford: : Berg 2002.
2
Tilley CY. Handbook of material culture. London: : SAGE 2006. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446206430
3
Miller D. A materialist approach to materiality. In: Materiality. Durham, N.C.: : Duke University Press 2005. 72–87.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ANTHGC01_50534.pdf
4
Rowlands M. A materialist approach to materiality. 2005.
5
Warnier J-P. A Praxeological Approach to Subjectivation in a Material World. Journal of Material Culture 2001;6:5–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/135918350100600101
6
Tilley C. Ethnography and Material Culture. In: Handbook of ethnography / edited by Paul Atkinson ... [et al.]. 2001. http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ANTHGC01_73663.pdf
7
Roseberry W. MARX AND ANTHROPOLOGY. Annual Review of Anthropology 1997;26:25–46. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.25
8
Tilley C. Objectification. In: Handbook of material culture. London: : SAGE 2006. 60–73.https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446206430
9
Hodder I. Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2011;17:154–77. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x
10
Boivin N. Material cultures, material minds: the impact of things on human thought, society, and evolution. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2008.
11
Miller D. Material cultures: why some things matter. London: : University College London Press 1997.
12
Lemonnier P. Mundane objects: materiality and non-verbal communication. Walnut Creek, Calif: : Left Coast 2012.
13
Olsen B. In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects. Lanham: : Rowman & Littlefield Publishers 2010.
14
Buchli V. The material culture reader. Oxford: : Berg 2002.
15
Hicks D, Beaudry MC. The Oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199218714.001.0001
16
Bloch M, Association of Social Anthropologists of the Commonwealth. Marxist analyses and social anthropology. London: : Malaby Press 1975.
17
Elster J. An Introduction to Karl Marx. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163620
18
Foster JB. Marx’s ecology: materialism and nature. New York: : Monthly Review Press 2000. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt9qgbtv
19
Gledhill J. Power and its disguises: anthropological perspectives on politics. 2nd ed. London: : Pluto Press 2000. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt18fs65g
20
Roseberry W. Anthropologies and histories: essays in culture, history, and political economy. New Brunswick, N.J.: : Rutgers University Press 1989.
21
Scheper‐Hughes N. The global traffic in human organs. Current Anthropology 2000;41. doi:10.1086/300123
22
Wolf ER. Europe and the people without history. [New ed.]. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2010.
23
Wolf ER. Envisioning power: ideologies of dominance and crisis. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1999.
24
Wolf ER, Silverman S. Pathways of power: building an anthropology of the modern world. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2001. http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780520924871/
25
Wolf ER, Silverman S. Pathways of power: building an anthropology of the modern world. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2001. http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780520924871/
26
Mintz SW. Sweetness and power: the place of sugar in modern history. New York: : Penguin Books 1986.
27
Roseberry W. The Rise of Yuppie Coffees and the Reimagination of Class in the United States. American Anthropologist 1996;98:762–75.http://www.jstor.org/stable/681884
28
Tilley CY. Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives. In: A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Oxford: : Berg 1994. 7–34.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d31d0aaf-8b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
29
Abram D. Philosophy on the way to ecology: a technical introduction to the inquiry. In: The spell of the sensuous: perception and language in a more-than-human world. New York: : Vintage Books 1996. 31–72.
30
Helliwell C. Space and sociality in a Dayak longhouse. In: Things as they are: new directions in phenomenological anthropology. Bloomington: : Indiana University Press 1996. 128–48.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7bdefea9-46b3-e711-80cb-005056af4099
31
Adams PC, Hoelscher SD, Till KE. Textures of place: exploring humanist geographies. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 2001. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttttg77
32
Casey ES. How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: phenomenological prolegomena. In: Senses of place. Santa Fe, NM: : School of American Research Press 1996. 13–52.
33
Casey ES. Getting back into place: toward a renewed understanding of the place-world. 2nd ed. Bloomington, Ind: : Indiana University Press 2009.
34
Csáky M. How does it feel? Exploring the world of your senses. London: : Thames and Hudson 1979.
35
Thomas J. Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. London: : Routledge 1996.
36
Weiss G, Haber HF. Perspectives on embodiment: the intersections of nature and culture. London: : Routledge 1999. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203905258
37
Hammond M, Howarth J, Keat R. Understanding phenomenology. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1991.
38
Maurice Merleau-Ponty. Phenomenology of perception. London: : Routledge 2012.
39
Madison GB. The phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty: a search for the limits of consciousness. Athens: : Ohio University Press 1981.
40
Weiner JF. Tree leaf talk: a Heideggerian anthropology. Oxford: : Berg 2001.
41
Sperber D. Claude Levi-Strauss. In: Structuralism and since: from Lévi-Strauss to Derrida. New York: : Oxford University Press 19–51.
42
Sturrock J. Social Sciences. In: Structuralism. Oxford: : Blackwell Pub 2003. 48–73.
43
Derrida J. Writing and Man’s Exploitation by Man. In: Of grammatology. Baltimore: : Johns Hopkins University Press 1997. 118–40.
44
Morris RC. Legacies of Derrida: Anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 2007;36:355–89. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094357
45
Claire, Jacobson, and Brooke, Grundfest, Schoepf. Split representation in the Art of Asia and America. In: Structural anthropology. [New York]: : Basic Books 1963. 245–66.https://soth.alexanderstreet.com/cgi-bin/SOTH/hub.py?type=getdoc&docid=S10021413-D000014
46
Claude Lévi-Strauss. The Salish Swaihwe. In: The way of the masks. Seattle: : University of Washington Press 1982. 15–39.
47
Christopher, Tilley. Claude Levi Strauss: structuralism and beyond. In: Reading material culture: structuralism, hermeneutics and post-structuralism. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1990. 3–80.
48
Brunette P. Open City (1945). In: Roberto Rossellini. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1996. 41–60.
49
Peter Brunette, David Wills. The Frame of the Frame. In: Screen/play: Derrida and film theory. Princeton, New Jersey: : Princeton University Press 1989. 99–138.https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7zthjb.7
50
Christopher Norris. De Man and the Critique of Romantic Ideology. In: Paul de Man: deconstruction and the critique of aesthetic ideology. London: : Routledge 1988. 28–64.
51
Peter Brunette and David Wills. Introduction: The spatial arts : an interview with Jacques Derrida. In: Deconstruction and the visual arts: art, media, architecture. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994.
52
Fortis P. The birth of design: a Kuna theory of body and personhood. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2010;16:480–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01635.x
53
Gell A. The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology. In: The art of anthropology: essays and diagrams. Oxford: : Berg 2006. 159–86.
54
Tim Ingold. Of string bags and bird’s nests. Skill and the construction of artefacts. In: The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: : Routledge 2000. 349–61.
55
Gell A, Kokuritsu Minzokugaku Hakubutsukan. Time and social anthropology. Senri Ethnological Studies 1998;45.
56
British Academy. Proceedings of the British Academy. ;:123–47.
57
Gell A. Metamorphosis of the cassowaries: Umeda society, language and ritual. London: : Athlone Press 1975.
58
Gell A. The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps and images. Oxford: : Berg 1992.
59
Gell A. Wrapping in images: tattooing in Polynesia. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1993.
60
Gell A. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1998.
61
Gell A, Hirsch E. The art of anthropology: essays and diagrams. Oxford: : Berg 2006.
62
Pinney C, Thomas N. Beyond aesthetics: art and the technologies of enchantment. Oxford: : Berg 2001.
63
Carl Knappett. Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object. Journal of Material Culture 2002;7:97–117. doi:10.1177/1359183502007001307
64
Rampley M. Art history and cultural difference: Alfred Gell’s anthropology of art. Art History 2005;28:524–51. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8365.2005.00475.x
65
Morphy H. Art as a Mode of Action: Some Problems with Gell’s Art and Agency. Journal of Material Culture 2009;14:5–27. doi:10.1177/1359183508100006
66
Tim Ingold. Lines: a brief history. Abingdon: : Routledge 2007.
67
Ingold T. The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: : Routledge 2000.
68
Ingold T. Evolution and social life. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1986.
69
Tim Ingold. Making culture and weaving the world: Artefacts and organisms. In: Matter, materiality and modern culture. London: : Routledge 2000. 50–71.https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780203351635/startPage/63/1
70
Arjun Appadurai. Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. In: Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization. London: : University of Minnesota Press 1996. 27–44.
71
Taussig M. Redeeming Indigo. Theory, Culture & Society 2008;25:1–15. doi:10.1177/0263276408090655
72
Heyman JMcC, Campbell H. The anthropology of global flows: A critical reading of Appadurai’s `Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy’. Anthropological Theory 2009;9:131–48. doi:10.1177/1463499609105474
73
Jay M. Unsympathetic Magic:Nervous System. Visual Anthropology Review 1993;9:79–82. doi:10.1525/var.1993.9.2.79
74
Taussig M. Michael Taussig Replies to Martin Jay. Visual Anthropology Review 1994;10:154–154. doi:10.1525/var.1994.10.1.154
75
Jay M. Martin Jay Replies to Michael Taussig and Paul Stoller. Visual Anthropology Review 1994;10:163–4. doi:10.1525/var.1994.10.1.163
76
Taussig MT. Mimesis and alterity: a particular history of the senses. New York: : Routledge 1993.
77
Taussig MT. Beauty and the beast. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2012. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780226789880
78
Hevia JL. History, Theory, and Colonial Power: The Critical Method of Michael Taussig in Shamanism, Colonialism, and The Wild Man. Journal of Historical Sociology 1992;5:104–25. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6443.1992.tb00025.x
79
Bourdieu P. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. London: : Routledge & Kegan Paul 1984. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1433990
80
Wypijewski J, Komar V, Melamid A. Painting by numbers: Komar and Melamid’s scientific guide to art. New York: : Farrar Straus Giroux 1997.
81
Binkley S. Kitsch as a Repetitive System: A Problem for the Theory of Taste Hierarchy. Journal of Material Culture 2000;5:131–52. doi:10.1177/135918350000500201
82
Susan Orlean. Art for Everybody. Published Online First: 2001.http://www.susanorlean.com/articles/art_for_everybody.php
83
Boylan AL. Thomas Kinkade: the artist in the mall. Durham [NC]: : Duke University Press 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822393399
84
Fortis P. Kuna art and Shamanism: an ethnographic approach. Austin, Tex: : University of Texas Press 2012. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=497088&site=ehost-live&scope=site
85
Bessire L, Bond D. Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique. American Ethnologist 2014;41:440–56. doi:10.1111/amet.12083
86
Campbell S. The Captivating Agency of Art: many Ways of Seeing. In: Beyond aesthetics: art and the technologies of enchantment. Oxford: : Berg 2001.
87
Forge A. Style and Meaning in Sepik Art. In: Primitive art & society. London: : Oxford University Press for the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research 1973.
88
Gell A. Style and culture (Chapter 8). In: Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1998.
89
Holbraad M, Pedersen MA, Viveiros de Castro E. The Politics of Ontology: Anthropological Positions. Cultural anthropology journal of the Society for Cultural Anthropologyhttp://culanth.org/fieldsights/462-the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions
90
Lévi-Strauss C. Split representation in the Art of Asia and America. In: The anthropology of art: a reader. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2006.
91
Losche D. THE SEPIK GAZE: Iconographic Interpretation of Abelam Form. Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice 1995;:47–60.http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23171708?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
92
Viveiros de Castro E. Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation. Tipití - Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America 2004;2:3–22.http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=tipiti
93
Schüll ND. Addiction by design: machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 2012. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781400834655
94
Lemonnier P. From Field to Files: Description and Analysis of Technical Phenomena. In: Elements for an Anthropology of Technology. University of Michigan Press 2002. 25–50.
95
Martinon-Torres M. Chaîne Opératoire: The Concept and Its Applications Within the Study of Technology. Gallaecia 2002;21:29–43.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ANTHGC01_78306.pdf
96
Latour B. Technology is Society Made Durable. In: A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination. London: : Routledge 1991. 103–13.
97
Law J. Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. 1992;:379–93.http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law1992NotesOnTheTheoryOfTheActorNetwork.pdf
98
Coupaye L. Ways of Enchanting: Chaines Operatoires and Yam Cultivation in Nyamikum Village, Maprik, Papua New Guinea. Journal of Material Culture 2009;14:433–58. doi:10.1177/1359183509345945
99
Coupaye L. Growing artefacts, displaying relationships: yams, art and technology amongst the Nyamikum Abelam of Papua New Guinea. New York: : Berghahn Books 2013. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857457349
100
Buchli V. Architecture and the domestic sphere. In: The material culture reader. Oxford: : Berg 2002. 207–13.
101
Bourdieu P. The Berber house or the world reversed. Social Science Information 1970;9:151–70. doi:10.1177/053901847000900213
102
Garvey P. Organized Disorder: Moving furniture in Norwegian Homes. In: Miller D, ed. Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: : Berg 2001. 47–68.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e0b9b145-45db-e711-80cd-005056af4099
103
Benjamin W, Tiedemann R. The arcades project. Cambridge, Mass: : Belknap Press 2002.
104
Reimer S, Leslie D. Identity, Consumption, and the Home. Home Cultures 2004;1:187–208. doi:10.2752/174063104778053536
105
Buchli V, Lucas G. ‘The archaeology of alienation: a late twentieth century British council house’. In: Archaeologies of the contemporary past. London: : Routledge 2001.
106
Chevalier S. ‘From woollen carpet to grass carpet: bridging house and garden in an English suburb’. In: Material cultures: why some things matter. London: : University College London Press 1997.
107
Miller D. Appropriating the state on the council estate. Man 1988;23:353–72. doi:10.2307/2802810
108
Carsten J. Houses of Memory and Kinship. In: After Kinship. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2003. 31–56.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800382
109
Cieraad I. At home: an anthropology of domestic space. Syracuse, N.Y.: : Syracuse University Press 1999.
110
Humphrey C. Inside a Mongolian tent. New society 1974;30:273–5.
111
Low SM, Lawrence-Zúñiga D. The anthropology of space and place: locating culture. Malden, Mass: : Blackwell 2003.
112
Rivière P. Houses, places and people: community and continuity in Guiana. In: About the house: Lévi-Strauss and beyond. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995. 189–205.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607653
113
Gell A. ‘9.6 The Maori meeting house’. In: Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1998. 251–8.
114
Fernandez J. Fang Architectonics. 1977.http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/12695104?selectedversion=NBD5337787
115
Miller D. Behind closed doors. In: Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: : Berg 2001. 1–19.
116
McCraken G. Homeyness - a cultural account of one constellation of consumer goods and meanings. In: Interpretive consumer research. [London]: : Association for Consumer Research 1989. 168–83.
117
Froud D. Thinking Beyond the Homely: Countryside Properties and the Shape of Time. Home Cultures 2004;1:211–33. doi:10.2752/174063104778053473
118
Gullestad M. Hearth and home. In: Kitchen-table society: a case study of the family life and friendships of young working-class mothers in urban Norway. Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y: : Distribution in United States and Canada, Columbia University Press 1984.
119
Chevalier S. From woollen carpet to grass carpet: bridging house and garden in an English suburb. In: Material cultures: why some things matter. London: : University College London Press 1997.
120
Young DJB. The Material Value of Color: The Estate Agent’s Tale. Home Cultures 2004;1:5–22. doi:10.2752/174063104778053572
121
Csikszentmihalyi M, Halton E. The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1981. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167611
122
Putnam T, Newton C. Household choices. London: : Futures 1990.
123
Miller D. Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: : Berg 2001.
124
Marcoux J-S. Body Exchanges: Material Culture, Gender and Stereotypes in the Making. Home Cultures 2004;1:51–60. doi:10.2752/174063104778053608
125
Colomina B, Bloomer J. Sexuality & space. New York, N.Y.: : Princeton Architectural Press 1992.
126
Cullens C. Gimme Shelter: At Home with the Millennium . Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies 1999;11:204–27.
127
Sanders J. Stud: architectures of masculinity. New York: : Princeton Architectural Press 1996.
128
Spain D. Gendered spaces. Chapel Hill: : University of North Carolina Press 1992.
129
Froud D. Thinking Beyond the Homely: Countryside Properties and the Shape of Time. Home Cultures 2004;1:211–33. doi:10.2752/174063104778053473
130
Hayden D. The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1981.
131
Fehervary K. American Kitchens, Luxury Bathrooms, and the Search for a ‘Normal’ Life in Postsocialist Hungary. Ethnos 2001;67:369–400. doi:10.1080/0014184022000031211
132
Silverstone R. Visions of suburbia. London: : Routledge 1997.
133
Blier SP. The anatomy of architecture: ontology and metaphor in Batammaliba architectural expression. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987.
134
Certeau M de, Giard L, Mayol P. Practice of Everyday Life: Volume 2: Living and Cooking. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 2014. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt5vkbhw
135
Buchli V. An archaeology of socialism. Oxford: : Berg Publishers 1999.
136
Marcoux J-S. The ‘Casser Maison’ Ritual: Constructing the Self by Emptying the Home. Journal of Material Culture 2001;6:213–35. doi:10.1177/135918350100600205
137
Foucault M. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. 2nd Vintage Books ed. New York: : Vintage Books 1995.
138
Helliwell C. Space and sociality in a Dayak longhouse. In: Things as they are: new directions in phenomenological anthropology. Bloomington: : Indiana University Press 1996.
139
Bachelard G. The poetics of space. Boston [Mass.]: : Beacon Press 1994.
140
Prussin L. When Nomads settle: Changing Technologies of Building and Transport and the Production of Architectural Form among the Gabra. In: African material culture. Bloomington: : Indiana University Press 1996. 73–102.http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780253116635/
141
Victor Buchli. An archaeology of socialism. Oxford: : Berg Publishers 1999.
142
Foucault M. Space, knowledge and power. In: The Foucault reader. London: : Penguin 1991. 239–56.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7ba7c01b-d2e4-e711-80cd-005056af4099
143
Buchli V, Lucas G. The Archaeology of Alienation: a late twentieth-century British Council Flat. In: Archaeologies of the contemporary past. London: : Routledge 2001.
144
Bloch M. The resurrection of the house amongst the Zafimaniry of Madagascar. In: About the house: Lévi-Strauss and beyond. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1995. 69–83.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607653
145
Hallam E, Hockey JL. Death, memory and material culture. Oxford: : Berg 2001.
146
Chaplin E. The use of visual representation in anthropology and sociology. In: Sociology and visual representation. London: : Routledge 1994.
147
Kopytoff I. The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process. The Social Life of Things. 1986;:64–91.http://web-facstaff.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Kopytoff_CulturalBiography.pdf
148
Horst H, Miller D. From kinship to link‐up: cell phones and social networking in Jamaica. Current Anthropology 2005;46:755–78.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/432650
149
Kallinkos J, Aaltonen A, Marton A. A Theory of Digital Objects. 2010.http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3033/2564
150
Pfaff J. A mobile phone: mobility, materiality and everyday Swahili trading practices. Cultural Geographies 2010;17:341–57. doi:10.1177/1474474010368606
151
Appadurai A. Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. Theory, Culture & Society 1990;7:295–310. doi:10.1177/026327690007002017
152
Barendregt B. Sex, Cannibals, and the Language of Cool: Indonesian Tales of the Phone and Modernity. The Information Society 2008;24:160–70. doi:10.1080/01972240802020044
153
Dant T. True Automobility. In: Objects and materials: a Routledge companion. London: : Routledge 2014.
154
Haddon L. Domestication and Mobile Telephony. In: Machines That Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology. Transaction Publishers
155
Harvey P, Knox H. ‘Introduction’ in Objects and materials: a Routledge companion. In: Objects and materials: a Routledge companion. London: : Routledge 2014.
156
Horst HA, Miller D. The cell phone: an anthropology of communication. Oxford: : Berg 2006. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847883193
157
Horst HA. The blessings and burdens of communication: cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields. Global Networks 2006;6:143–59. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00138.x
158
Hui Y. What is a Digital Object? Metaphilosophy 2012;43:380–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x
159
Kockelman P. The anthropology of an equation. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 2013;3. doi:10.14318/hau3.3.003
160
Mcintosh J. Mobile phones and Mipoho’s prophecy: The powers and dangers of flying language. American Ethnologist 2010;37:337–53. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01259.x
161
Mintz SW. Sweetness and power: the place of sugar in modern history. Penguin Books 1986.
162
Ruppert E, Law J, Savage M. Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices. Theory, Culture & Society 2013;30:22–46. doi:10.1177/0263276413484941
163
Stammler FM. Mobile Phone Revolution in the Tundra? Technological Change among Russian Reindeer Nomads. Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore 2009;41:47–78. doi:10.7592/FEJF2009.41.stammler
164
Sterne J. The mp3 as cultural artifact. New Media & Society 2006;8:825–42. doi:10.1177/1461444806067737
165
Strathern M. Abstraction and Decontextualisation or E for Ethnography. 2000.http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm
166
Tenhunen S. Mobile technology in the village: ICTs, culture, and social logistics in India. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2008;14:515–34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00515.x
167
Viseu A, Suchman L. Wearable Augmentation: Imaginaries of the Informed Body. In: Technologized images, technologized bodies. New York: : Berghahn Books 2010. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1337807
168
Pinney C. Photography and anthropology. London: : Reaktion 2011.
169
Martin J. Scopic Regimes of Modernity. In: Vision and visuality. Seattle: : Bay Press 1988. 3–21.
170
MacDougall D. The Visual in Anthropology. In: Rethinking visual anthropology. London: : Yale University Press 1999. 276–95.
171
Latour B. What is Iconoclash ? or Is there a world beyond the image wars? Horizontes antropológicos;14:110–50.http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/downloads/84-ICONOCLASH%20PDF.pdf
172
Wright C. The Third Subject: Perspectives on Visual Anthropology. Anthropology Today 1998;14:16–22.
173
Ruby J. Picturing culture: explorations of film & anthropology. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2000.
174
Deger J. Shimmering screens: making media in an aboriginal community. Minneapolis: : University of Minnesota Press 2006. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttttt3k
175
Pinney C. Camera Indica: the social life of Indian photographs. London: : Reaktion Books 1997.
176
Ginsburg F. Culture / Media: A Mild Polemic. Anthropology Today 1994;10:5–15.
177
Fabian J. Time and the other: how anthropology makes its object. New York: : Columbia University Press 2002.
178
Geismar H. What’s in a Price?: An Ethnography of Tribal Art at Auction. Journal of Material Culture 2001;6:25–47. doi:10.1177/135918350100600102
179
Clifford J. On collecting art and culture (chapter 10). In: The predicament of culture: twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1988. 215–51.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ANTHGC01_65322.pdf
180
Hinsley CM. The world as marketplace: commodification of the exotic at the world’s Columbian exhibition (chapter 18). In: Exhibiting cultures: the poetics and politics of museum display. Washington, D.C: : Smithsonian Institution Press 1991. 344–63.http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ANTHGC01_65325.pdf
181
Benjamin W. The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. Published Online First: 1936.http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm
182
Bennett T. The birth of the museum: history, theory, politics. London: : Routledge 1995. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1487028
183
Conkey M. Style, Design and Function. In: Handbook of material culture. London: : SAGE 2006. 355–72.https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446206430
184
Gell A. Style and Culture (chapter 8). In: Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1998. 155–215.
185
Tilley CY. Social values, social constraints and material culture: the design of contemporary beer cans. In: Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. London: : Routledge 1992.
186
Frankel D. Pottery decoration as an indicator of social relationships: a prehistoric Cypriot example’. In: Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics. London: : Duckworth 1978.
187
Korn SM. The formal analysis of visual systems as exemplified by a study of the Abelam (Papua New Guinea) paintings’. In: Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics. London: : Duckworth 1978.
188
Reichard GA. Melanesian design: a study of style in wood and tortoiseshell carving. New York: : AMS Press 1969.
189
Roaf M. A mathematical analysis of the styles of the Persepolis reliefs’. In: Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics. London: : Duckworth 1978.
190
Washburn DK, Crowe DW. Symmetries of culture: theory and practice of plane pattern analysis. Seattle: : University of Washington Press 1988.
191
Flynn D. My Customers are Different! Identity, Difference, and the Political Economy of Design. In: Ethnography and the corporate encounter: reflections on research in and of corporations. New York: : Berghahn Books 2009. http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=630183&site=ehost-live&scope=site
192
Nafus D, Anderson K. Writing on Walls: the materiality of social memory in corporate research. In: Cefkin M, ed. Ethnography and the corporate encounter : reflections on research in and of corporations. New York; Oxford: : Berghahn Books 2009. 137–57.http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=630183&site=ehost-live&scope=site
193
Drazin A. The Social Life of Concepts in Design Anthropology. In: Gunn W, Smith RC, eds. Design anthropology: theory and practice. London: : Bloomsbury 2013. 33–50.
194
Drazin A, Roberts S. Exploring Design Dialogues for Ageing in Place. Anthropology in Action 2009;16:72–88. doi:10.3167/aia.2009.160107
195
Mellstrom U. The Intersection of Gender, Race and Cultural Boundaries, or Why is Computer Science in Malaysia Dominated by Women? Social Studies of Science 2009;39:885–907. doi:10.1177/0306312709334636
196
Ross P. Problematizing the user in user-centered production: A new media lab meets its audiences. Social Studies of Science 2010;41:251–70. doi:10.1177/0306312710385851
197
Suchman L. Feminist STS and the Sciences of the Artificial. In: The handbook of science and technology studies. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 2008. 139–65.https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780262274685
198
Tunstall D. Decolonizing Design Innovation: Design Anthropology, Critical Anthropology, and Indigenous Knowledge. In: Gunn W, Smith RC, eds. Design anthropology: theory and practice. London: : Bloomsbury 2013. 232–50.
199
Suchman L. Anthropological Relocations and the Limits of Design. Annual Review of Anthropology 2011;40:1–18. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.041608.105640
200
Fulton Suri J. Poetic Observation: What Designers Make of What They See. In: Clarke AJ, ed. Design anthropology: object culture in the 21st century. Wien: : Springer 2011. 16–32.
201
Ingold T. Anthropology is Not Ethnography. In: Proceedings of the British Academy. 2007. 69–92.
202
Frascara J. Design and the social sciences: making connections. London: : Taylor & Francis 2002. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203301302
203
Squires SE, Byrne B. Creating breakthrough ideas: the collaboration of anthropologists and designers in the product development industry. Westport, Conn: : Bergin & Garvey 2002.
204
Simonsen J, Robertson T. Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design (Hardback) - Routledge. 2012.http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415694407/
