[1]
V. Buchli, The material culture reader. Oxford: Berg, 2002.
[2]
C. Y. Tilley, Handbook of material culture. London: SAGE, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446206430
[3]
D. Miller, ‘A materialist approach to materiality’, in Materiality, Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2005, pp. 72–87 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ANTHGC01_50534.pdf
[4]
M. Rowlands, A materialist approach to materiality. 2005.
[5]
J.-P. Warnier, ‘A Praxeological Approach to Subjectivation in a Material World’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 5–24, Mar. 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/135918350100600101.
[6]
C. Tilley, ‘Ethnography and Material Culture’, in Handbook of ethnography / edited by Paul Atkinson ... [et al.]., 2001 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ANTHGC01_73663.pdf
[7]
W. Roseberry, ‘MARX AND ANTHROPOLOGY’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 25–46, Oct. 1997, doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.25.
[8]
C. Tilley, ‘Objectification’, in Handbook of material culture, London: SAGE, 2006, pp. 60–73 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446206430
[9]
I. Hodder, ‘Human-thing entanglement: towards an integrated archaeological perspective’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 154–177, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01674.x.
[10]
N. Boivin, Material cultures, material minds: the impact of things on human thought, society, and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
[11]
D. Miller, Material cultures: why some things matter, vol. Consumption and space. London: University College London Press, 1997.
[12]
P. Lemonnier, Mundane objects: materiality and non-verbal communication, vol. Critical cultural heritage series. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast, 2012.
[13]
B. Olsen, In defense of things: archaeology and the ontology of objects, vol. Archaeology in society series. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2010.
[14]
V. Buchli, The material culture reader. Oxford: Berg, 2002.
[15]
D. Hicks and M. C. Beaudry, The Oxford handbook of material culture studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199218714.001.0001
[16]
M. Bloch and Association of Social Anthropologists of the Commonwealth, Marxist analyses and social anthropology, vol. ASA studies. London: Malaby Press, 1975.
[17]
J. Elster, An Introduction to Karl Marx. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139163620
[18]
J. B. Foster, Marx’s ecology: materialism and nature. New York: Monthly Review Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt9qgbtv
[19]
J. Gledhill, Power and its disguises: anthropological perspectives on politics, 2nd ed., vol. Anthropology, culture, and society. London: Pluto Press, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt18fs65g
[20]
W. Roseberry, Anthropologies and histories: essays in culture, history, and political economy. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press, 1989.
[21]
N. Scheper‐Hughes, ‘The global traffic in human organs’, Current Anthropology, vol. 41, no. 2, Apr. 2000, doi: 10.1086/300123.
[22]
E. R. Wolf, Europe and the people without history, [New ed.]. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2010.
[23]
E. R. Wolf, Envisioning power: ideologies of dominance and crisis. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999.
[24]
E. R. Wolf and S. Silverman, Pathways of power: building an anthropology of the modern world. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780520924871/
[25]
E. R. Wolf and S. Silverman, Pathways of power: building an anthropology of the modern world. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780520924871/
[26]
S. W. Mintz, Sweetness and power: the place of sugar in modern history. New York: Penguin Books, 1986.
[27]
W. Roseberry, ‘The Rise of Yuppie Coffees and the Reimagination of Class in the United States’, American Anthropologist, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 762–775, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/681884
[28]
C. Y. Tilley, ‘Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives’, in A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments, vol. Explorations in anthropology, Oxford: Berg, 1994, pp. 7–34 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d31d0aaf-8b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[29]
D. Abram, ‘Philosophy on the way to ecology: a technical introduction to the inquiry’, in The spell of the sensuous: perception and language in a more-than-human world, New York: Vintage Books, 1996, pp. 31–72.
[30]
C. Helliwell, ‘Space and sociality in a Dayak longhouse’, in Things as they are: new directions in phenomenological anthropology, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996, pp. 128–148 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7bdefea9-46b3-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[31]
P. C. Adams, S. D. Hoelscher, and K. E. Till, Textures of place: exploring humanist geographies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttttg77
[32]
E. S. Casey, ‘How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: phenomenological prolegomena’, in Senses of place, vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series, Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 1996, pp. 13–52.
[33]
E. S. Casey, Getting back into place: toward a renewed understanding of the place-world, 2nd ed., vol. Studies in Continental thought. Bloomington, Ind: Indiana University Press, 2009.
[34]
M. Csáky, How does it feel? Exploring the world of your senses. London: Thames and Hudson, 1979.
[35]
J. Thomas, Time, culture and identity: an interpretative archaeology. London: Routledge, 1996.
[36]
G. Weiss and H. F. Haber, Perspectives on embodiment: the intersections of nature and culture. London: Routledge, 1999 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203905258
[37]
M. Hammond, J. Howarth, and R. Keat, Understanding phenomenology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1991.
[38]
Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Phenomenology of perception, vol. Routledge classics. London: Routledge, 2012.
[39]
G. B. Madison, The phenomenology of Merleau-Ponty: a search for the limits of consciousness, vol. Series in Continental thought. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1981.
[40]
J. F. Weiner, Tree leaf talk: a Heideggerian anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 2001.
[41]
D. Sperber, ‘Claude Levi-Strauss’, in Structuralism and since: from Lévi-Strauss to Derrida, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 19–51.
[42]
J. Sturrock, ‘Social Sciences’, in Structuralism, 2nd ed., Oxford: Blackwell Pub, 2003, pp. 48–73.
[43]
J. Derrida, ‘Writing and Man’s Exploitation by Man’, in Of grammatology, Corrected ed., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1997, pp. 118–140.
[44]
R. C. Morris, ‘Legacies of Derrida: Anthropology’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 355–389, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.36.081406.094357.
[45]
Claire, Jacobson, and Brooke, Grundfest, Schoepf, ‘Split representation in the Art of Asia and America’, in Structural anthropology, vol. 1, [New York]: Basic Books, 1963, pp. 245–266 [Online]. Available: https://soth.alexanderstreet.com/cgi-bin/SOTH/hub.py?type=getdoc&docid=S10021413-D000014
[46]
Claude Lévi-Strauss, ‘The Salish Swaihwe’, in The way of the masks, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1982, pp. 15–39.
[47]
Christopher, Tilley, ‘Claude Levi Strauss: structuralism and beyond’, in Reading material culture: structuralism, hermeneutics and post-structuralism, vol. Social archaeology, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990, pp. 3–80.
[48]
P. Brunette, ‘Open City (1945)’, in Roberto Rossellini, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996, pp. 41–60.
[49]
Peter Brunette and David Wills, ‘The Frame of the Frame’, in Screen/play: Derrida and film theory, Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1989, pp. 99–138 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7zthjb.7
[50]
Christopher Norris, ‘De Man and the Critique of Romantic Ideology’, in Paul de Man: deconstruction and the critique of aesthetic ideology, London: Routledge, 1988, pp. 28–64.
[51]
Peter Brunette and David Wills, ‘Introduction: The spatial arts : an interview with Jacques Derrida’, in Deconstruction and the visual arts: art, media, architecture, vol. Cambridge studies in new art history and criticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
[52]
P. Fortis, ‘The birth of design: a Kuna theory of body and personhood’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 480–495, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2010.01635.x.
[53]
A. Gell, ‘The technology of enchantment and the enchantment of technology’, in The art of anthropology: essays and diagrams, vol. London School of Economics monographs on social anthropology, Oxford: Berg, 2006, pp. 159–186.
[54]
Tim Ingold, ‘Of string bags and bird’s nests. Skill and the construction of artefacts.’, in The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 349–361.
[55]
A. Gell and Kokuritsu Minzokugaku Hakubutsukan, ‘Time and social anthropology’, Senri Ethnological Studies, vol. 45, 1998.
[56]
British Academy, ‘Proceedings of the British Academy’, pp. 123–147.
[57]
A. Gell, Metamorphosis of the cassowaries: Umeda society, language and ritual, vol. London School of Economics monographs on social anthropology. London: Athlone Press, 1975.
[58]
A. Gell, The anthropology of time: cultural constructions of temporal maps and images, vol. Explorations in anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 1992.
[59]
A. Gell, Wrapping in images: tattooing in Polynesia, vol. Oxford studies in the anthropology of cultural forms. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993.
[60]
A. Gell, Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
[61]
A. Gell and E. Hirsch, The art of anthropology: essays and diagrams, vol. London School of Economics monographs on social anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 2006.
[62]
C. Pinney and N. Thomas, Beyond aesthetics: art and the technologies of enchantment. Oxford: Berg, 2001.
[63]
Carl Knappett, ‘Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes: Some Thoughts on Mind, Agency and Object’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 97–117, Mar. 2002, doi: 10.1177/1359183502007001307.
[64]
M. Rampley, ‘Art history and cultural difference: Alfred Gell’s anthropology of art’, Art History, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 524–551, Sep. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8365.2005.00475.x.
[65]
H. Morphy, ‘Art as a Mode of Action: Some Problems with Gell’s Art and Agency’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 5–27, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1177/1359183508100006.
[66]
Tim Ingold, Lines: a brief history. Abingdon: Routledge, 2007.
[67]
T. Ingold, The perception of the environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge, 2000.
[68]
T. Ingold, Evolution and social life, vol. Themes in the social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.
[69]
Tim Ingold, ‘Making culture and weaving the world: Artefacts and organisms’, in Matter, materiality and modern culture, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 50–71 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780203351635/startPage/63/1
[70]
Arjun Appadurai, ‘Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy’, in Modernity at large: cultural dimensions of globalization, vol. Public worlds, London: University of Minnesota Press, 1996, pp. 27–44.
[71]
M. Taussig, ‘Redeeming Indigo’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 1–15, May 2008, doi: 10.1177/0263276408090655.
[72]
J. McC. Heyman and H. Campbell, ‘The anthropology of global flows: A critical reading of Appadurai’s `Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy’’, Anthropological Theory, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 131–148, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1177/1463499609105474.
[73]
M. Jay, ‘Unsympathetic Magic:Nervous System’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 79–82, Sep. 1993, doi: 10.1525/var.1993.9.2.79.
[74]
M. Taussig, ‘Michael Taussig Replies to Martin Jay’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 154–154, Mar. 1994, doi: 10.1525/var.1994.10.1.154.
[75]
M. Jay, ‘Martin Jay Replies to Michael Taussig and Paul Stoller’, Visual Anthropology Review, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 163–164, Mar. 1994, doi: 10.1525/var.1994.10.1.163.
[76]
M. T. Taussig, Mimesis and alterity: a particular history of the senses. New York: Routledge, 1993.
[77]
M. T. Taussig, Beauty and the beast. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780226789880
[78]
J. L. Hevia, ‘History, Theory, and Colonial Power: The Critical Method of Michael Taussig in Shamanism, Colonialism, and The Wild Man’, Journal of Historical Sociology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 104–125, Mar. 1992, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6443.1992.tb00025.x.
[79]
P. Bourdieu, Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1433990
[80]
J. Wypijewski, V. Komar, and A. Melamid, Painting by numbers: Komar and Melamid’s scientific guide to art. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 1997.
[81]
S. Binkley, ‘Kitsch as a Repetitive System: A Problem for the Theory of Taste Hierarchy’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 131–152, Jul. 2000, doi: 10.1177/135918350000500201.
[82]
Susan Orlean, ‘Art for Everybody’, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.susanorlean.com/articles/art_for_everybody.php
[83]
A. L. Boylan, Thomas Kinkade: the artist in the mall. Durham [NC]: Duke University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/9780822393399
[84]
P. Fortis, Kuna art and Shamanism: an ethnographic approach. Austin, Tex: University of Texas Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=497088&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[85]
L. Bessire and D. Bond, ‘Ontological anthropology and the deferral of critique’, American Ethnologist, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 440–456, Aug. 2014, doi: 10.1111/amet.12083.
[86]
S. Campbell, ‘The Captivating Agency of Art: many Ways of Seeing’, in Beyond aesthetics: art and the technologies of enchantment, Oxford: Berg, 2001.
[87]
A. Forge, ‘Style and Meaning in Sepik Art’, in Primitive art & society, London: Oxford University Press for the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, 1973.
[88]
A. Gell, ‘Style and culture (Chapter 8)’, in Art and agency: an anthropological theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.
[89]
M. Holbraad, M. A. Pedersen, and E. Viveiros de Castro, ‘The Politics of Ontology: Anthropological Positions’, Cultural anthropology journal of the Society for Cultural Anthropology [Online]. Available: http://culanth.org/fieldsights/462-the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions
[90]
C. Lévi-Strauss, ‘Split representation in the Art of Asia and America’, in The anthropology of art: a reader, vol. Blackwell anthologies in social and cultural anthropology, Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2006.
[91]
D. Losche, ‘THE SEPIK GAZE: Iconographic Interpretation of Abelam Form’, Social Analysis: The International Journal of Social and Cultural Practice, no. 38, pp. 47–60, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/stable/23171708?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[92]
E. Viveiros de Castro, ‘Perspectival Anthropology and the Method of Controlled Equivocation’, Tipití - Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Lowland South America, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 3–22, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1010&context=tipiti
[93]
N. D. Schüll, Addiction by design: machine gambling in Las Vegas. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781400834655
[94]
P. Lemonnier, ‘From Field to Files: Description and Analysis of Technical Phenomena’, in Elements for an Anthropology of Technology, University of Michigan Press, 2002, pp. 25–50.
[95]
M. Martinon-Torres, ‘Chaîne Opératoire: The Concept and Its Applications Within the Study of Technology’, Gallaecia, vol. 21, pp. 29–43, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ANTHGC01_78306.pdf
[96]
B. Latour, ‘Technology is Society Made Durable’, in A sociology of monsters: essays on power, technology and domination, vol. Sociological review monograph, London: Routledge, 1991, pp. 103–113.
[97]
J. Law, ‘Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity’, 1992. [Online]. Available: http://www.heterogeneities.net/publications/Law1992NotesOnTheTheoryOfTheActorNetwork.pdf
[98]
L. Coupaye, ‘Ways of Enchanting: Chaines Operatoires and Yam Cultivation in Nyamikum Village, Maprik, Papua New Guinea’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 433–458, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1177/1359183509345945.
[99]
L. Coupaye, Growing artefacts, displaying relationships: yams, art and technology amongst the Nyamikum Abelam of Papua New Guinea, vol. Material mediations : people and things in a world of movement. New York: Berghahn Books, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780857457349
[100]
V. Buchli, ‘Architecture and the domestic sphere’, in The material culture reader, Oxford: Berg, 2002, pp. 207–213.
[101]
P. Bourdieu, ‘The Berber house or the world reversed’, Social Science Information, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 151–170, 1970, doi: 10.1177/053901847000900213.
[102]
P. Garvey, ‘Organized Disorder: Moving furniture in Norwegian Homes’, in Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors, D. Miller, Ed. Oxford: Berg, 2001, pp. 47–68 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e0b9b145-45db-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[103]
W. Benjamin and R. Tiedemann, The arcades project. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press, 2002.
[104]
S. Reimer and D. Leslie, ‘Identity, Consumption, and the Home’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 187–208, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053536.
[105]
V. Buchli and G. Lucas, ‘“The archaeology of alienation: a late twentieth century British council house”’, in Archaeologies of the contemporary past, London: Routledge, 2001.
[106]
S. Chevalier, ‘“From woollen carpet to grass carpet: bridging house and garden in an English suburb”’, in Material cultures: why some things matter, vol. Consumption and space, London: University College London Press, 1997.
[107]
D. Miller, ‘Appropriating the state on the council estate’, Man, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 353–372, 1988, doi: 10.2307/2802810.
[108]
J. Carsten, ‘Houses of Memory and Kinship’, in After Kinship, vol. New Departures in Anthropology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 31–56 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800382
[109]
I. Cieraad, At home: an anthropology of domestic space, vol. Space, place, and society. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1999.
[110]
C. Humphrey, ‘Inside a Mongolian tent’, New society, vol. 30, no. 630, pp. 273–275, 1974.
[111]
S. M. Low and D. Lawrence-Zúñiga, The anthropology of space and place: locating culture, vol. Blackwell readers in anthropology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2003.
[112]
P. Rivière, ‘Houses, places and people: community and continuity in Guiana’, in About the house: Lévi-Strauss and beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 189–205 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607653
[113]
A. Gell, ‘“9.6 The Maori meeting house”’, in Art and agency: an anthropological theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998, pp. 251–258.
[114]
J. Fernandez, ‘Fang Architectonics’. 1977 [Online]. Available: http://trove.nla.gov.au/work/12695104?selectedversion=NBD5337787
[115]
D. Miller, ‘Behind closed doors’, in Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors, Oxford: Berg, 2001, pp. 1–19.
[116]
G. McCraken, ‘Homeyness - a cultural account of one constellation of consumer goods and meanings’, in Interpretive consumer research, [London]: Association for Consumer Research, 1989, pp. 168–183.
[117]
D. Froud, ‘Thinking Beyond the Homely: Countryside Properties and the Shape of Time’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 211–233, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053473.
[118]
M. Gullestad, ‘Hearth and home’, in Kitchen-table society: a case study of the family life and friendships of young working-class mothers in urban Norway, Irvington-on-Hudson, N.Y: Distribution in United States and Canada, Columbia University Press, 1984.
[119]
S. Chevalier, ‘From woollen carpet to grass carpet: bridging house and garden in an English suburb’, in Material cultures: why some things matter, vol. Consumption and space, London: University College London Press, 1997.
[120]
D. J. B. Young, ‘The Material Value of Color: The Estate Agent’s Tale’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 5–22, 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053572.
[121]
M. Csikszentmihalyi and E. Halton, The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167611
[122]
T. Putnam and C. Newton, Household choices. London: Futures, 1990.
[123]
D. Miller, Home possessions: material culture behind closed doors. Oxford: Berg, 2001.
[124]
J.-S. Marcoux, ‘Body Exchanges: Material Culture, Gender and Stereotypes in the Making’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 51–60, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053608.
[125]
B. Colomina and J. Bloomer, Sexuality & space, vol. Princeton papers on architecture. New York, N.Y.: Princeton Architectural Press, 1992.
[126]
C. Cullens, ‘Gimme Shelter: At Home with the Millennium ’, Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 204–227, 1999.
[127]
J. Sanders, Stud: architectures of masculinity. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 1996.
[128]
D. Spain, Gendered spaces. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.
[129]
D. Froud, ‘Thinking Beyond the Homely: Countryside Properties and the Shape of Time’, Home Cultures, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 211–233, Nov. 2004, doi: 10.2752/174063104778053473.
[130]
D. Hayden, The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1981.
[131]
K. Fehervary, ‘American Kitchens, Luxury Bathrooms, and the Search for a “Normal” Life in Postsocialist Hungary’, Ethnos, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 369–400, Nov. 2001, doi: 10.1080/0014184022000031211.
[132]
R. Silverstone, Visions of suburbia. London: Routledge, 1997.
[133]
S. P. Blier, The anatomy of architecture: ontology and metaphor in Batammaliba architectural expression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
[134]
M. de Certeau, L. Giard, and P. Mayol, Practice of Everyday Life: Volume 2: Living and Cooking. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt5vkbhw
[135]
V. Buchli, An archaeology of socialism. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 1999.
[136]
J.-S. Marcoux, ‘The “Casser Maison” Ritual: Constructing the Self by Emptying the Home’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 213–235, Jul. 2001, doi: 10.1177/135918350100600205.
[137]
M. Foucault, Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison, 2nd Vintage Books ed. New York: Vintage Books, 1995.
[138]
C. Helliwell, ‘Space and sociality in a Dayak longhouse’, in Things as they are: new directions in phenomenological anthropology, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996.
[139]
G. Bachelard, The poetics of space. Boston [Mass.]: Beacon Press, 1994.
[140]
L. Prussin, ‘When Nomads settle: Changing Technologies of Building and Transport and the Production of Architectural Form among the Gabra’, in African material culture, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996, pp. 73–102 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/books/9780253116635/
[141]
Victor Buchli, An archaeology of socialism. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 1999.
[142]
M. Foucault, ‘Space, knowledge and power’, in The Foucault reader, vol. Penguin social sciences, London: Penguin, 1991, pp. 239–256 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7ba7c01b-d2e4-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[143]
V. Buchli and G. Lucas, ‘The Archaeology of Alienation: a late twentieth-century British Council Flat’, in Archaeologies of the contemporary past, London: Routledge, 2001.
[144]
M. Bloch, ‘The resurrection of the house amongst the Zafimaniry of Madagascar’, in About the house: Lévi-Strauss and beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, pp. 69–83 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607653
[145]
E. Hallam and J. L. Hockey, Death, memory and material culture, vol. Materializing culture. Oxford: Berg, 2001.
[146]
E. Chaplin, ‘The use of visual representation in anthropology and sociology’, in Sociology and visual representation, London: Routledge, 1994.
[147]
I. Kopytoff, ‘The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process’, The Social Life of Things, 1986. [Online]. Available: http://web-facstaff.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Kopytoff_CulturalBiography.pdf
[148]
H. Horst and D. Miller, ‘From kinship to link‐up: cell phones and social networking in Jamaica’, Current Anthropology, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 755–778, Dec. 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/432650
[149]
J. Kallinkos, A. Aaltonen, and A. Marton, ‘A Theory of Digital Objects’, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3033/2564
[150]
J. Pfaff, ‘A mobile phone: mobility, materiality and everyday Swahili trading practices’, Cultural Geographies, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 341–357, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1177/1474474010368606.
[151]
A. Appadurai, ‘Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 295–310, Jun. 1990, doi: 10.1177/026327690007002017.
[152]
B. Barendregt, ‘Sex, Cannibals, and the Language of Cool: Indonesian Tales of the Phone and Modernity’, The Information Society, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 160–170, May 2008, doi: 10.1080/01972240802020044.
[153]
T. Dant, ‘True Automobility’, in Objects and materials: a Routledge companion, vol. Culture, economy and the social, London: Routledge, 2014.
[154]
L. Haddon, ‘Domestication and Mobile Telephony’, in Machines That Become Us: The Social Context of Personal Communication Technology, Transaction Publishers.
[155]
P. Harvey and H. Knox, ‘“Introduction” in Objects and materials: a Routledge companion’, in Objects and materials: a Routledge companion, vol. Culture, economy and the social, London: Routledge, 2014.
[156]
H. A. Horst and D. Miller, The cell phone: an anthropology of communication. Oxford: Berg, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847883193
[157]
H. A. Horst, ‘The blessings and burdens of communication: cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields’, Global Networks, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 143–159, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00138.x.
[158]
Y. Hui, ‘What is a Digital Object?’, Metaphilosophy, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 380–395, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9973.2012.01761.x.
[159]
P. Kockelman, ‘The anthropology of an equation’, HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, vol. 3, no. 3, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.14318/hau3.3.003.
[160]
J. Mcintosh, ‘Mobile phones and Mipoho’s prophecy: The powers and dangers of flying language’, American Ethnologist, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 337–353, May 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1548-1425.2010.01259.x.
[161]
S. W. Mintz, Sweetness and power: the place of sugar in modern history. Penguin Books, 1986.
[162]
E. Ruppert, J. Law, and M. Savage, ‘Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 22–46, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1177/0263276413484941.
[163]
F. M. Stammler, ‘Mobile Phone Revolution in the Tundra? Technological Change among Russian Reindeer Nomads’, Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore, vol. 41, pp. 47–78, 2009, doi: 10.7592/FEJF2009.41.stammler.
[164]
J. Sterne, ‘The mp3 as cultural artifact’, New Media & Society, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 825–842, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1461444806067737.
[165]
M. Strathern, ‘Abstraction and Decontextualisation or E for Ethnography’, 2000. [Online]. Available: http://virtualsociety.sbs.ox.ac.uk/GRpapers/strathern.htm
[166]
S. Tenhunen, ‘Mobile technology in the village: ICTs, culture, and social logistics in India’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 515–534, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9655.2008.00515.x.
[167]
A. Viseu and L. Suchman, ‘Wearable Augmentation: Imaginaries of the Informed Body’, in Technologized images, technologized bodies, New York: Berghahn Books, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1337807
[168]
C. Pinney, Photography and anthropology, vol. Exposures. London: Reaktion, 2011.
[169]
J. Martin, ‘Scopic Regimes of Modernity’, in Vision and visuality, vol. Discussions in contemporary culture, Seattle: Bay Press, 1988, pp. 3–21.
[170]
D. MacDougall, ‘The Visual in Anthropology’, in Rethinking visual anthropology, London: Yale University Press, 1999, pp. 276–295.
[171]
B. Latour, ‘What is Iconoclash ? or Is there a world beyond the image wars?’, Horizontes antropológicos, vol. 14, no. 29, pp. 110–150 [Online]. Available: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/downloads/84-ICONOCLASH%20PDF.pdf
[172]
C. Wright, ‘The Third Subject: Perspectives on Visual Anthropology’, Anthropology Today, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 16–22, 1998.
[173]
J. Ruby, Picturing culture: explorations of film & anthropology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
[174]
J. Deger, Shimmering screens: making media in an aboriginal community, vol. Visible evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.cttttt3k
[175]
C. Pinney, Camera Indica: the social life of Indian photographs, vol. Envisioning Asia. London: Reaktion Books, 1997.
[176]
F. Ginsburg, ‘Culture / Media: A Mild Polemic’, Anthropology Today, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 5–15, 1994.
[177]
J. Fabian, Time and the other: how anthropology makes its object. New York: Columbia University Press, 2002.
[178]
H. Geismar, ‘What’s in a Price?: An Ethnography of Tribal Art at Auction’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25–47, Mar. 2001, doi: 10.1177/135918350100600102.
[179]
J. Clifford, ‘On collecting art and culture (chapter 10)’, in The predicament of culture: twentieth-century ethnography, literature, and art, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1988, pp. 215–251 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ANTHGC01_65322.pdf
[180]
C. M. Hinsley, ‘The world as marketplace: commodification of the exotic at the world’s Columbian exhibition (chapter 18)’, in Exhibiting cultures: the poetics and politics of museum display, Washington, D.C: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1991, pp. 344–363 [Online]. Available: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/ANTHGC01_65325.pdf
[181]
W. Benjamin, ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’, 1936 [Online]. Available: http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm
[182]
T. Bennett, The birth of the museum: history, theory, politics, vol. Culture : policies and politics. London: Routledge, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1487028
[183]
M. Conkey, ‘Style, Design and Function’, in Handbook of material culture, London: SAGE, 2006, pp. 355–372 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781446206430
[184]
A. Gell, ‘Style and Culture (chapter 8)’, in Art and agency: an anthropological theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998, pp. 155–215.
[185]
C. Y. Tilley, ‘Social values, social constraints and material culture: the design of contemporary beer cans’, in Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice, 2nd ed., London: Routledge, 1992.
[186]
D. Frankel, ‘Pottery decoration as an indicator of social relationships: a prehistoric Cypriot example’’, in Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics, London: Duckworth, 1978.
[187]
S. M. Korn, ‘The formal analysis of visual systems as exemplified by a study of the Abelam (Papua New Guinea) paintings’’, in Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics, London: Duckworth, 1978.
[188]
G. A. Reichard, Melanesian design: a study of style in wood and tortoiseshell carving. New York: AMS Press, 1969.
[189]
M. Roaf, ‘A mathematical analysis of the styles of the Persepolis reliefs’’, in Art in society: studies in style, culture and aesthetics, London: Duckworth, 1978.
[190]
D. K. Washburn and D. W. Crowe, Symmetries of culture: theory and practice of plane pattern analysis. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1988.
[191]
D. Flynn, ‘My Customers are Different! Identity, Difference, and the Political Economy of Design’, in Ethnography and the corporate encounter: reflections on research in and of corporations, vol. Studies in public and applied anthropology, New York: Berghahn Books, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=630183&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[192]
D. Nafus and K. Anderson, ‘Writing on Walls: the materiality of social memory in corporate research’, in Ethnography and the corporate encounter : reflections on research in and of corporations, M. Cefkin, Ed. New York; Oxford: Berghahn Books, 2009, pp. 137–157 [Online]. Available: http://libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=630183&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[193]
A. Drazin, ‘The Social Life of Concepts in Design Anthropology’, in Design anthropology: theory and practice, W. Gunn and R. C. Smith, Eds. London: Bloomsbury, 2013, pp. 33–50.
[194]
A. Drazin and S. Roberts, ‘Exploring Design Dialogues for Ageing in Place’, Anthropology in Action, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 72–88, 2009, doi: 10.3167/aia.2009.160107.
[195]
U. Mellstrom, ‘The Intersection of Gender, Race and Cultural Boundaries, or Why is Computer Science in Malaysia Dominated by Women?’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 885–907, 2009, doi: 10.1177/0306312709334636.
[196]
P. Ross, ‘Problematizing the user in user-centered production: A new media lab meets its audiences’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 251–270, 2010, doi: 10.1177/0306312710385851.
[197]
L. Suchman, ‘Feminist STS and the Sciences of the Artificial’, in The handbook of science and technology studies, 3rd ed., Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2008, pp. 139–165 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780262274685
[198]
D. Tunstall, ‘Decolonizing Design Innovation: Design Anthropology, Critical Anthropology, and Indigenous Knowledge’, in Design anthropology: theory and practice, W. Gunn and R. C. Smith, Eds. London: Bloomsbury, 2013, pp. 232–250.
[199]
L. Suchman, ‘Anthropological Relocations and the Limits of Design’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2011, doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.041608.105640.
[200]
J. Fulton Suri, ‘Poetic Observation: What Designers Make of What They See’, in Design anthropology: object culture in the 21st century, vol. Edition Angewandte, A. J. Clarke, Ed. Wien: Springer, 2011, pp. 16–32.
[201]
T. Ingold, ‘Anthropology is Not Ethnography’, in Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 154, 2007, pp. 69–92.
[202]
J. Frascara, Design and the social sciences: making connections, vol. Contemporary Trends Institute. London: Taylor & Francis, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780203301302
[203]
S. E. Squires and B. Byrne, Creating breakthrough ideas: the collaboration of anthropologists and designers in the product development industry. Westport, Conn: Bergin & Garvey, 2002.
[204]
J. Simonsen and T. Robertson, ‘Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design (Hardback) - Routledge’, 2012. [Online]. Available: http://www.routledge.com/books/details/9780415694407/
