[1]
Advocate Generals Opinion 2002. *Case C-292/00 Davidoff & Cie SA, Zino Davidoff SA v Gofkid Ltd [2003] ECR I 389, [2002] ETMR 99.
[2]
Advocate Generals Opinion 1997. *Case C-337/95 Parfums Christian Dior SA v Evora BV [1997] ECR I-1603.
[3]
Alexandra Sims 2005. ‘A shift in the centre of gravity’: the dangers of protecting privacy through breach of confidence. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 1, (2005), 27–51.
[4]
Andreas Rahmatian 2005. Music and creativity as perceived by copyright law. Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2005), 267–293.
[5]
Andrew Griffiths 2001. The impact of the global appreciation approach on the boundaries of trade mark protection. Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2001), 326–360.
[6]
Andrew Griffiths 2007. The trade mark monopoly: an analysis of the core zone of absolute protection under Art.5(1)(a). Intellectual Property Quarterly. 3, (2007), 312–349.
[7]
Andrew Griffiths 2007. The trade mark monopoly: an analysis of the core zone of absolute protection under Art.5(1)(a). Intellectual Property Quarterly. 3, (2007), 312–349.
[8]
Bainbridge, David I. 2012. Intellectual property. Pearson.
[9]
Benelux Court of Justice 1979. Colgate-Palmolive BV v Koninklijke Distilleerderijen Erven Lucas Bols NV (1976) 7 IIC 420 (CLAERYN/KLAREIN).
[10]
Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad 2009. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[11]
Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad 2009. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[12]
Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad 2009. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad 2009. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[14]
Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad 2009. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[15]
Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad 2009. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[16]
Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad 2009. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[17]
Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad 2009. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[18]
Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad 2009. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[19]
Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad 2009. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[20]
Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad 2009. Intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[21]
Bergquist, J. and Curley, D. 2008. Shape trade marks and fast-moving consumer goods. European Intellectual Property Review. (2008), 17–24.
[22]
Chancery Division 2001. Antiquesportfolio.Com Plc v. Rodney Fitch & Company Limited [2001] ECDR 5.
[23]
Chancery Division 2005. Brighton v Jones [2005] FSR 16.
[24]
Chancery Division 1997. Creation Records v News Group Newspapers [1997] EMLR 444.
[25]
Chancery Division 1996. De Maudsley v Palumbo [1996] FSR 447.
[26]
Chancery Division 1999. Hadley v Kemp [1999] EMLR 589.
[27]
Chancery Division 2002. *Irvine v Talksport Ltd [2002] 1 WLR 2355.
[28]
Chancery Division 2002. *Irvine v Talksport Ltd [2002] 1 WLR 2355.
[29]
Chancery Division 2006. Julius Sämann Ltd v Tetrosyl Ltd [2006] EWHC 529.
[30]
Chancery Division 1985. Lawson v Dundas.
[31]
Chancery Division 1991. *Noah v Shuba [1991] FSR 14.
[32]
Chancery Division 2006. Nova Productions Ltd v. Mazooma Games Ltd [2006] RPC 14.
[33]
Chancery Division 2006. Nova Productions Ltd v. Mazooma Games Ltd [2006] RPC 14.
[34]
Chancery Division 1998. *Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622.
[35]
Chancery Division 2007. RxWorks Ltd v Hunter [2007] EWHC 3061.
[36]
Chancery Division 1993. Waterman (Pete) Ltd v CBS United Kingdom Ltd [1993] EMLR 27.
[37]
Chancery Division (Patents Court) 2000. Glaxo Group Ltd v Dowelhurst Ltd (No 2) [2000] FSR 529.
[38]
Christie, Andrew and Gare, Stephen 2012. Blackstone’s statutes on intellectual property. Oxford University Press.
[39]
Christophe Geiger 2007. Trade marks and freedom of expression - the proportionality of criticism. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 38, 3 (2007), 317–327.
[40]
Christopher Wadlow 2011. Passing off at the crossroads again: a review article for Hazel Carty, An Analysis of the Economic Torts. European Intellectual Property Review. 33, 7 (2011), 447–455.
[41]
Claire Howell 2006. Trade marks: what constitutes ‘genuine use’? Laboratoires Goemar SA v La Mer Technology. European Intellectual Property Review. 28, 2 (2006), 118–121.
[42]
Cornish, W. R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell.
[43]
Cornish, W. R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell.
[44]
Cornish, W. R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell.
[45]
Cornish, W. R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell.
[46]
Cornish, W. R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell.
[47]
Cornish, W. R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell.
[48]
Cornish, W. R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell.
[49]
Cornish, W. R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell.
[50]
Cornish, W. R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell.
[51]
Cornish, W. R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell.
[52]
Cornish, W. R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell.
[53]
Court: Chancery Division 1961. Bollinger v Costa Brava Wine Co Ltd [1961] RPC 116.
[54]
Court: Chancery Division 1974. British Northrop Ltd v Texteam Blackburn Ltd [1974] RPC 57.
[55]
Court: Chancery Division 1969. *Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1968] FSR 415, [1969] RPC 41.
[56]
Court: Chancery Division 1969. *Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1968] FSR 415, [1969] RPC 41.
[57]
Court: Chancery Division 1969. *Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1968] FSR 415, [1969] RPC 41.
[58]
Court: Chancery Division 1969. Vine Products Ltd v Mackenzie & Co Ltd [1969] RPC 1.
[59]
Court: Court of Appeal 1984. Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik, Budweiser Case [1984] FSR 413.
[60]
Court: Court of Appeal 2007. *L’Oreal SA v Bellure NV [2007] EWCA Civ 968, [2008] RPC 196.
[61]
Court: Court of Appeal 1967. Seager v Copydex Ltd [1967] 2 All ER 415, [1967] 1 WLR 923.
[62]
Court: Court of Appeal 1967. Seager v Copydex Ltd [1967] 2 All ER 415, [1967] 1 WLR 923.
[63]
Court: Court of Appeal 1952. Stevenson (or Stephenson) Jordan and Harrison Ltd v MacDonald and Evans (1952) 1 TLR 101.
[64]
Court: Court of First Instance, EC 2005. Les Editions Albert Rene v OHIM (Case T-336/03) [2005] ECR II-4667.
[65]
Court: English court pre-dating November 1874 1849. Albert (Prince) v Strange (1849) 18 LJ Ch 120, 1 H & Tw 1.
[66]
Court: English court pre-dating November 1874 1849. Albert (Prince) v Strange (1849) 18 LJ Ch 120, 1 H & Tw 1.
[67]
Court: European Court of Justice 2003. *Linde AG, Winward Industries Inc & Rado Uhren AG v Deutsches Patentund Markenamt (Cases C-53/01, 54/01 & 55/01) [2003] ECR-I 3161, [2003] RPC 803.
[68]
Court: European Court of Justice 1999. Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV: C-342/97 [1999] ECR I-3819, [1999] All ER (EC) 587.
[69]
Court: European Court of Justice 1999. Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV: C-342/97 [1999] ECR I-3819, [1999] All ER (EC) 587.
[70]
Court: European Court of Justice 1999. Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV: C-342/97 [1999] ECR I-3819, [1999] All ER (EC) 587.
[71]
Court: European Court of Justice 1999. Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV: C-342/97 [1999] ECR I-3819, [1999] All ER (EC) 587.
[72]
Court: House of Lords 2004. *Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UK HL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457.
[73]
Court: House of Lords 2004. *Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UK HL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457.
[74]
Court: House of Lords 2004. *Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UK HL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457.
[75]
Court: House of Lords 1911. Edge (William) & Sons Ltd v William Niccolls & Sons Ltd [1911] AC 693.
[76]
Court: House of Lords 1901. IRC v Muller & Co’s Margarine Ltd [1901] AC 217.
[77]
Court: House of Lords 1915. *Spalding (A.G.) & Bros v A.W. Gamage Ltd and Benetfink & Co Ltd (1915) 32 RPC 273 (HL).
[78]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2003. *Arsenal Football Club plc v Reed [2003] ETMR 73 (CA).
[79]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2007. Baigent & Leigh v Random House [2007] EWCA Civ 247, [2007] FSR 24.
[80]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2003. Beckingham v Hodgens [2003] ECDR 6 (Ch D); [2003] EMLR 18 (CA).
[81]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2008. Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward [2008] EWCA Civ 83, [2008] ETMR 36.
[82]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2010. Diageo v Intercontinental Brands [2010] ETMR 57.
[83]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2011. Donald v Ntuli [2011] 1 WLR 294.
[84]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2005. Douglas v Hello! Ltd [2005] 4 All ER 128; [2005] 3 WLR 881.
[85]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2001. Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No.1) QB 967, [2001] 2 WLR 992.
[86]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 1982. Exxon Corp v Exxon Insurance Consultants International Ltd [1982] Ch 119.
[87]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 1987. *Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler [1987] Ch 117.
[88]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2005. Griggs Group Ltd v Evans [2005] FSR 31.
[89]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 1996. Harrods v Harrodian School [1996] RPC 697.
[90]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 1996. Harrods v Harrodian School [1996] RPC 697.
[91]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2010. Hotel Cipriani Srl v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd [2010] RPC 16.
[92]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2010. Hotel Cipriani Srl v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd [2010] RPC 16.
[93]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2008. HRH Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] Ch 57, [2007] 3 WLR 222.
[94]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 1991. Kaye v Robertson [1991] FSR 62.
[95]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 1984. Lion Laboratories Ltd v Evans [1984] 2 All ER 417.
[96]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2010. L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV [2010] ETMR 47 (Court of Appeal).
[97]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2007. Mastercigars Direct Ltd v Hunters and Frankau [2007] ETMR 54.
[98]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2009. *Murray v Express Newspapers Plc [2009] Ch 481.
[99]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2000. *Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2) [1999] FSR 79, [2000] FSR 363 (CA).
[100]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2000. *Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2) [1999] FSR 79, [2000] FSR 363 (CA).
[101]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2007. Nova Productions Ltd v. Mazooma Games Ltd [2007] RPC 25.
[102]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2007. Nova Productions Ltd v. Mazooma Games Ltd [2007] RPC 25 (CA).
[103]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2004. Reed Executive Plc v Reed Business Information Ltd [2004] ETMR 56.
[104]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2005. *Sawkins v Hyperion Records [2005] RPC 32; [2005] 1 WLR 3281.
[105]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 2005. *Sawkins v Hyperion Records [2005] RPC 32; [2005] 1 WLR 3281.
[106]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 1993. Taittinger SA v Allbev Ltd [1993] FSR 641.
[107]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 1993. Taittinger SA v Allbev Ltd [1993] FSR 641.
[108]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 1993. Taittinger SA v Allbev Ltd [1993] FSR 641.
[109]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 1977. Woodward v Hutchins [1977] 2 All ER 751; [1977] 1 WLR 760.
[110]
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) 1997. ZYX Music GmbH v King [1995] 3 All ER 1, [1997] 2 All ER 129.
[111]
Court of First Instance 2006. Eden SARL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) [2006] (T-305/04) ETMR 14.
[112]
Court of Session (Outer House) 1953. John Haig & Co Ltd v Forth Blending Co Ltd (1953) 70 RPC 259.
[113]
David Booton 2011. The informal acquisition of copyright. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 1, (2011), 28–49.
[114]
Davis, J. 2005. The Need to Leave Free for Others to Use and the Trade Mark Common. Trade mark use. Oxford University Press.
[115]
Dowie-Whybrow, M. 2013. Core statutes on intellectual property. Palgrave Macmillan.
[116]
Dowie-Whybrow, M. 2013. Core statutes on intellectual property. Palgrave Macmillan.
[117]
Estelle Derclaye 2010. Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening (C-5/08): wonderful or worrisome? The impact of the ECJ ruling in Infopaq on UK copyright law. European Intellectual Property Review. (2010), 247–251.
[118]
European Court of Human Rights 2011. Mosley v United Kingdom [2012] EMLR 1.
[119]
European Court of Human Rights 2004. *Von Hannover v Germany (59320/00) (2004) 40 EHRR 1.
[120]
European Court of Human Rights 2004. *Von Hannover v Germany (59320/00) (2004) 40 EHRR 1.
[121]
European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber) 2012. Axel Springer v Germany [2012] EMLR 15.
[122]
European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber) 2012. Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) [2012] EMLR 16.
[123]
European Court of Justice 1974. Case 8/74 Procureur du Roi v Dassonville [1974] ECR 837 at 852, [1974] 2 CMLR 436.
[124]
European Court of Justice 2002. Case C-2/00 Hölterhoff v Ulrich Freiesleben [2002] ETMR 917.
[125]
European Court of Justice 2005. *Case C–16/03 Peak Holding v Axolin-Elinor [2004] ECR I–11313, [2005] Ch 261, [2005] 2 WLR 650.
[126]
European Court of Justice 1999. *Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1.
[127]
European Court of Justice 1999. *Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1.
[128]
European Court of Justice 1999. *Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1.
[129]
European Court of Justice 1999. *Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1.
[130]
European Court of Justice 1999. *Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1.
[131]
European Court of Justice 2003. *Case C-40/01 Ansul BV and Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (Minimax) [2003] ECR I-2439, [2003] ETMR 85.
[132]
European Court of Justice 1999. Case C-63/97 BMW v Deenik [1999] ECR I-905, [1999] 1 CMLR 1099.
[133]
European Court of Justice 2002. *Case C-143/00 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer I”) [2002] ECR I-3759, [2002] All ER (EC) 581.
[134]
European Court of Justice 2003. *Case C-206/01 Arsenal Football Club plc v Reed, [2002] ECR I-10273, [2003] ETMR 19 (ECJ).
[135]
European Court of Justice 1998. *Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma [1997] ECR I-6191, [1998] ETMR 1.
[136]
European Court of Justice 1998. *Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma [1997] ECR I-6191, [1998] ETMR 1.
[137]
European Court of Justice 1998. *Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma [1997] ECR I-6191, [1998] ETMR 1.
[138]
European Court of Justice 1995. Case C-317/91 Deutsche Renault AG v Audi AG [1993] ECR I-6227, [1995] 1 CMLR 461.
[139]
European Court of Justice 1998. Case C-355/96 Silhouette International Schmied GmbH v Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft mbH [1998] ECR I-4799, [1998] 2 CMLR 953.
[140]
European Court of Justice 2000. Case C-375/97 General Motors v Yplon [2000] RPC 572.
[141]
European Court of Justice 2000. Case C-379/97 Pharmacia & Upjohn SA v Paranova A/S ("Paranova II”)[1999] ECR I-6927, [2000] 1 CMLR 51.
[142]
European Court of Justice 2002. *Case C-414/99 Zino Davidoff SA v A&G Imports Ltd [2001] ECR I-8691, [2002] Ch 109, [2002] 1 CMLR 1.
[143]
European Court of Justice 2002. *Case C-414/99 Zino Davidoff SA v A&G Imports Ltd [2001] ECR I-8691, [2002] Ch 109, [2002] 1 CMLR 1.
[144]
European Court of Justice 1997. *Case C-427/93 Bristol-Myers Squibb v Paranova [1996] ECR I-3457, [1997] 1 CMLR 1151.
[145]
European Court of Justice 1997. *Case C-427/93 Bristol-Myers Squibb v Paranova [1996] ECR I-3457, [1997] 1 CMLR 1151.
[146]
European Court of Justice 1974. Cases C-15 & 16/74 Centrafarm v Sterling Drug, Centrafarm v Winthrop [1974] ECR 1147, 1183, [1974] 2 CMLR 480.
[147]
European Court of Justice 2002. *Koninklijke Philips v Remington (Case C-299/99) [2002] ECR I-5475, [2002] ETMR 81.
[148]
European Court of Justice 2002. *Koninklijke Philips v Remington (Case C-299/99) [2002] ECR I-5475, [2002] ETMR 81.
[149]
European Court of Justice 2004. *OHIM v Wm Wrigley Junior Co (DOUBLEMINT) (Case C-191/01 P) [2004] RPC 327, [2004] 1 WLR 1728.
[150]
European Court of Justice 2004. *OHIM v Wm Wrigley Junior Co (DOUBLEMINT) (Case C-191/01 P) [2004] RPC 327, [2004] 1 WLR 1728.
[151]
European Court of Justice 2002. Philips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd (Case C-299/99) [2002] ECR I-5475, [2002] All ER (EC) 634, [2002] 2 CMLR 1329.
[152]
European Court of Justice 2001. Procter & Gamble Company v OHIM (BABY DRY) (Case C-383/99 P) [2001] ECR I-6251, [2002] Ch 82.
[153]
European Court of Justice 2002. *Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (C-273/00) [2002] ECR I-11737; [2003] ETMR 37.
[154]
European Court of Justice 2002. *Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (C-273/00) [2002] ECR I-11737; [2003] ETMR 37.
[155]
European Court of Justice 2002. *Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (C-273/00) [2002] ECR I-11737; [2003] ETMR 37.
[156]
European Court of Justice 1999. Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions und Vertriebs GmbH v Boots und Segelzubehor Walter Huber (Cases C-108/97 and 109/97) [1999] ECR I-2779, [2000] 2 WLR 205.
[157]
European Court of Justice 1999. Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions und Vertriebs GmbH v Boots und Segelzubehor Walter Huber (Cases C-108/97 and 109/97) [1999] ECR I-2779, [2000] 2 WLR 205.
[158]
European Court of Justice 1999. *Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions und Vertriebs GmbH v Boots und Segelzubehor Walter Huber (Cases C-108/97 and 109/97) [1999] ECR I-2779, [2000] 2 WLR 205.
[159]
European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 2004. Case C-100/02 Gerolsteiner & Brunnen GmbH & Co. v Putsch GmbH [2004] ETMR 40.
[160]
European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 2004. Case C-100/02 Gerolsteiner & Brunnen GmbH & Co. v Putsch GmbH [2004] ETMR 40.
[161]
European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber) 1999. Case C-173/98 Sebago Inc and Ancienne Maison Dubois v GB Unic SA [1999] ETMR 681.
[162]
European Court of Justice (First Chamber) 2012. Case C-323/09 Interflora v Marks & Spencer plc [2012] ETMR 1.
[163]
European Court of Justice (First Chamber) 2012. Case C-323/09 Interflora v Marks & Spencer plc [2012] ETMR 1.
[164]
European Court of Justice (First Chamber) 2009. Case C-487/07 L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV [2009] ECR I-5185; [2010] RPC 1; [2009] ETMR 55 (ECJ).
[165]
European Court of Justice (First Chamber) 2009. Case C-487/07 L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV [2009] ECR I-5185; [2010] RPC 1; [2009] ETMR 55 (ECJ).
[166]
European Court of Justice (First Chamber) 2009. Case C-487/07 L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV [2009] ECR I-5185; [2010] RPC 1; [2009] ETMR 55 (ECJ).
[167]
European Court of Justice (First Chamber) 2008. *Case C-533/06 O2 Holdings Ltd v Hutchison 3G UK Ltd [2008] ETMR 55.
[168]
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 2007. Case C-17/06 Céline v Céline SA [2007] ECR I-7041, [2007] ETMR 80.
[169]
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 2007. Case C-17/06 Céline v Céline SA [2007] ECR I-7041, [2007] ETMR 80.
[170]
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 2007. Case C-17/06 Céline v Céline SA [2007] ECR I-7041, [2007] ETMR 80.
[171]
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 2011. Case C-324/09 L’Oreal SA v eBay International AG [2011] ETMR 53.
[172]
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 2010. *Lego Juris v OHIM (Case C-48/09 P) [2010] ETMR 63.
[173]
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 2007. *Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52.
[174]
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 2007. *Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52.
[175]
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 2007. *Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52.
[176]
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 2007. *Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52.
[177]
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 2007. *Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52.
[178]
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 2005. SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v OHIM (Case C-329/02) (SAT.2), [2005] 1 CMLR 1546.
[179]
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 2005. SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v OHIM (Case C-329/02) (SAT.2), [2005] 1 CMLR 1546.
[180]
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 2005. SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v OHIM (Case C-329/02) (SAT.2), [2005] 1 CMLR 1546.
[181]
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber) 2005. SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v OHIM (Case C-329/02) (SAT.2), [2005] 1 CMLR 1546.
[182]
European Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) 2004. *Case C-408/01 Adidas-Salomon AG & Adidas Benelux BV v Fitnessworld Trading Ltd [2004] ETMR 10.
[183]
European Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) 2004. *Case C-408/01 Adidas-Salomon AG & Adidas Benelux BV v Fitnessworld Trading Ltd [2004] ETMR 10.
[184]
European Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) 2004. Procter & Gamble v OHIM (Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P) [2004] ETMR 89.
[185]
European Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber) 2004. Shield Mark BV v Joost Kist H.O.D.N. Memex (Case C-283/01) [2004] ETMR 33.
[186]
European Court of Justice (Third Chamber) 2005. *Case 228/03 Gillette Company v LA-Laboratories Ltd Case [2005] ETMR 67.
[187]
European Court of Justice (Third Chamber) 2005. *Case 228/03 Gillette Company v LA-Laboratories Ltd Case [2005] ETMR 67.
[188]
European Court of Justice (Third Chamber) 2012. *Case C-145/10 Eva-Maria Painer v Standard Verlags GmbH, [2012] ECDR 6.
[189]
European Court of Justice (Third Chamber) 2012. *Case C-145/10 Eva-Maria Painer v Standard Verlags GmbH, [2012] ECDR 6.
[190]
European Court of Justice (Third Chamber) 2007. Case C-246/05 Armin Häupl v Lidl Stiftung & Co KG [2007] ETMR 61.
[191]
European Court of Justice (Third Chamber) 2004. Case C-259/02 La Mer Technology Inc v Laboratoires Goemar SA [2004] ETMR 47.
[192]
Fhima, I.S. 2011. The Court of Justice’s protection of the advertising function of trade marks: an (almost) sceptical analysis. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 6, 5 (2011), 325–329. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpr004.
[193]
Fysh, Michael et al. 2010. The modern law of patents. LexisNexis.
[194]
Gangjee, D. and Burrell, R. Because You’re Worth It: L’Oreal and the Prohibition on Free Riding. Modern Law Review. 73, 2, 282–295. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00794.x.
[195]
Garnett, K. M. et al. 2011. Copinger and Skone James on copyright. Sweet & Maxwell.
[196]
Gavin Phillipson 2003. Transforming breach of confidence? Towards a common law right of privacy under the Human Rights Act. Modern Law Review. 66, 5 (2003), 726–758.
[197]
Gill Grassie 2006. Parallel imports and trade marks - where are we? Part 1. European Intellectual Property Review. 28, 9 (2006), 474–479.
[198]
Gill Grassie 2006. Parallel imports and trade marks: Part 2: the repackaging cases. European Intellectual Property Review. 28, 10 (2006), 513–516.
[199]
H1 Appeal from the High Court (Chancery Division) 2003. Arsenal v Reed [2003] RPC 39.
[200]
Helberger, N. et al. 2008. Never forever: why extending the term of protection for sound recordings is a bad idea. European Intellectual Property Review. 30, 5 (2008), 174–181.
[201]
Helen Norman 2004. Time to blow the whistle on trade mark use? Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2004), 1–34.
[202]
Helen Norman 2004. Time to blow the whistle on trade mark use? Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2004), 1–34.
[203]
House of Lords 2009. Fisher v Brooker [2007] EMLR 9; [2007] FSR 12 (Ch D); [2008] EMLR 13 (CA); [2009] 1 WLR 1764 (HL).
[204]
House of Lords 1976. George Hensher Ltd v Restawile Upholstery (Lancs) Ltd [1976] AC 64.
[205]
House of Lords 1964. Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 273.
[206]
House of Lords 1964. Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 273.
[207]
House of Lords 2003. Newspaper Licensing Agency v Marks & Spencer Plc [2001] Ch 257 (CA); [2003] 1 AC 551 (HL).
[208]
House of Lords 2008. OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, HL.
[209]
House of Lords 2004. *R v Johnstone [2004] ETMR 2.
[210]
House of Lords 1990. *Reckitt & Colman v Borden [1990] RPC 341; [1990] 1 WLR 491.
[211]
House of Lords 1990. *Reckitt & Colman v Borden [1990] RPC 341; [1990] 1 WLR 491.
[212]
House of Lords 1896. *Reddaway v Banham [1896] AC 199.
[213]
House of Lords 2005. S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 AC 593.
[214]
House of Lords 2003. Wainwright v Home Office (AC 406).
[215]
Ilanah Simon 2005. How does ‘essential function’ doctrine drive European mark trade law? International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. (2005), 401–420.
[216]
Ilanah Simon 2007. Nominative use and honest practices in industrial and commercial matters - a very European history. Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2007), 117–147.
[217]
Intellectual Property Office 1994. Trade Marks Act 1994.
[218]
Intellectual Property Office 1994. Trade Marks Act 1994.
[219]
Intellectual Property Office 1994. Trade Marks Act 1994.
[220]
Irini A. Stamatoudi 2000. ‘Joy’ for the claimant: can a film also be protected as a dramatic work? Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2000), 117–126.
[221]
Jacob, Robin et al. 2013. Guidebook to intellectual property. Hart.
[222]
Jacob, Robin et al. 2013. Guidebook to intellectual property. Hart.
[223]
Jennifer Davis 2010. Why the United Kingdom should have a law against misappropriation. Cambridge Law Journal. 69, 3 (2010), 561–581.
[224]
Jeremy Phillips 2005. Trade mark law and the need to keep free. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 36, 4 (2005), 389–401.
[225]
Jochen Pagenberg. 2004. Trade dress and the three dimensional mark - the neglected children of trade mark law? International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 35, 7 (2004), 831–843.
[226]
Joshi, R. and Isaac, B. 2005. What does identical mean? European Intellectual Property Review. 27, 5 (2005), 184–187.
[227]
Keeling, David T. 2003. Intellectual property rights in EU law: Vol. 1: Free movement and competition law. Oxford University Press.
[228]
Kitchin, David et al. 2005. Kerly’s law of trade marks and trade names. Sweet & Maxwell.
[229]
Laddie, Hugh 2000. The modern law of copyright and designs. Butterworths.
[230]
Laddie, Justice 1996. Copyright: over-strength, over-regulated, over-rated? European Intellectual Property Review. 18, 5 (1996), 253–260.
[231]
Liakatou, V. and Maniatis, S. 2010. Lego - building a European concept of functionality. European Intellectual Property Review. 32, 12 (2010), 653–656.
[232]
M. Senftlebel 2011. Bringing EU Trademark Law Back Into Shape – Lessons to Learn from Keyword Advertising. 6th Annual Conference of the EPIP Association: Fine-Tuning IPR Debates (8 September 2011).
[233]
Morcom, Christopher 2005. The modern law of trade marks. LexisNexis Butterworths.
[234]
N.A. Moreham 2005. Privacy in the common law: a doctrinal and theoretical analysis. Law Quarterly Review. 121, Oct (2005), 628–656.
[235]
Nigel P. Gravells 2007. Authorship and originality: the persistent influence of Walter v Lane. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 3, (2007), 267–293.
[236]
Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Opposition Division) 2000. Zanella SNC’s Community Trade Mark Application (B.42053) [2000] ETMR 69.
[237]
Patents County Court 2013. Redd Solicitors LLP v Red Legal Ltd [2012] EWPCC 54, [2013] ETMR 13.
[238]
Patents County Court 2012. *Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas Ltd [2012] FSR 9.
[239]
Patricia Loughlan 2005. Descriptive trade marks, fair use and consumer confusion. European Intellectual Property Review. 27, 12 (2005), 443–445.
[240]
Phillips, J. Strong trade marks and the likelihood of confusion in European law. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 1, 6, 385–397. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpl038.
[241]
Phillips, Jeremy 2003. Trade mark law: a practical anatomy. Oxford University Press.
[242]
Phillips, Jeremy 2003. Trade mark law: a practical anatomy. Oxford University Press.
[243]
Pila, J. Copyright and Its Categories of Original Works. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 30, 2, 229–254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq009.
[244]
Privy Council 1981. Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Pub Squash Co Pty Ltd [1981] 1 WLR 193 (PC).
[245]
Privy Council (Hong Kong) 1989. *Interlego AG v Tyco Industries Inc [1989] AC 217.
[246]
Queen’s Bench Division 2008. Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EMLR 20.
[247]
Queen’s Bench Division 2008. *Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB), [2008] EMLR 20.
[248]
Queen’s Bench Division 2012. *Spelman v Express Newspapers [2012] EWHC 355.
[249]
Rachael Mulheron 2006. A potential framework for privacy? A reply to Hello! Modern Law Review. 69, 5 (2006), 679–713.
[250]
Rebecca Baines 2005. Copyright in commissioned works: a cause for uncertainty. European Intellectual Property Review. 27, 3 (2005), 122–123.
[251]
Richard Arnold 2007. Confidence in exclusives: Douglas v Hello! in the House of Lords. European Intellectual Property Review. 29, 8 (2007), 339–343.
[252]
Richard Arnold 2005. Copyright in photographs: a case for reform. European Intellectual Property Review. 27, 9 (2005), 303–305.
[253]
Richard Arnold 2001. Joy: a reply. Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2001), 10–21.
[254]
Ricketson, S. 1984. Reaping without sowing: Unfair Competition and Intellectual Property Rights in Anglo-Australian Law. University of New South Wales Law Journal. 7, 1 (1984).
[255]
Roughton, A. 2005. Permitted Infringing Use: the Scope of Defences to an Infringement Action. Trade mark use. Oxford University Press.
[256]
Schechter, F. 1927. The Rational Basis of Trade Mark Protection. Harvard Law Review. 40, (1927).
[257]
Silver, I. and Lee, P. 2007. Protecting your Rights – Copyright in Computer Games: Nova Productions and Mazooma Games Ltd. European Intellectual Property Review. 29, 6 (2007), 251–255.
[258]
Spence, M. 2002. Justifying Copyright. Dear images: art, copyright and culture. Ridinghouse:, ICA. 389–403.
[259]
Spence, Michael 2007. Intellectual property. Oxford University Press.
[260]
Spence, Michael 2007. Intellectual property. Oxford University Press.
[261]
Stothers, Christopher 2007. Parallel trade in Europe: intellectual property, competition and regulatory law. Hart.
[262]
Supreme Court 2009. *Lucasfilms v Ainsworth [2009] FSR 2.
[263]
Supreme Court 2009. *Lucasfilms v Ainsworth [2009] FSR 2.
[264]
Tania S.L. Cheng 2006. Does copyright law confer a monopoly over unpreserved cows? European Intellectual Property Review. (2006), 276–281.
[265]
Tanya Aplin 2007. The development of the action for breach of confidence in a post-HRA era. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 19, (2007).
[266]
Terrell, Thomas and Thorley, Simon 2006. Terrell on the law of patents. Sweet & Maxwell.
[267]
Torremans, Paul and Holyoak, Jon 2013. Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law. Oxford University Press.
[268]
Trade Marks Registry (Appointed Person) 2007. Dennis Woodman v French Connection [2007] RPC 1.
[269]
Trade Marks Registry (Appointed Person) 2005. Re Basic Trademark SA’s Trade Mark Application [2005] RPC 25.
[270]
Trade Marks Registry (Appointed Person) 2002. Re Ghazilian’s Trade Mark Application [2002] RPC 33.
[271]
Wadlow, Christopher 2004. The law of passing-off: unfair competition by misrepresentation. Sweet & Maxwell.
[272]
Waelde, Charlotte 2014. Contemporary intellectual property: law and policy. Oxford University Press.
[273]
Zemer, L. Contribution and collaboration in joint authorship: too many misconceptions. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 1, 4, 283–292. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpl005.
[274]
1990. AG v Guardian Newspapers [1990] AC 109.
[275]
1990. AG v Guardian Newspapers [1990] AC 109.
[276]
1990. AG v Guardian Newspapers [1990] AC 109.
[277]
1990. AG v Guardian Newspapers [1990] AC 109.
[278]
2007. Case C-48/05 Adam Opel v Autec [2007] ETMR 33.
[279]
2007. Case C-48/05 Adam Opel v Autec [2007] ETMR 33.
[280]
2009. Case C-59/08 Copad SA v Christian Dior Couture [2009] FSR 859 (22).
[281]
2009. Case C-59/08 Copad SA v Christian Dior Couture [2009] FSR 859 (22).
[282]
2009. *Case C-252/07 Intel Corporation Inc v CPM United Kingdom Ltd [2009] ETMR 13.
[283]
2003. *Case C-291/00 LTJ Diffusion v Sadas Vertbaudet, [2003] ECR I-2799, [2003] ETMR 83.
[284]
2003. *Case C-291/00 LTJ Diffusion v Sadas Vertbaudet, [2003] ECR I-2799, [2003] ETMR 83.
[285]
2011. Case C-324/09 L’Oréal v eBay International [2011] RPC 27.
[286]
2011. Case C-324/09 L’Oréal v eBay International [2011] RPC 27.
[287]
2009. Case T-387/06 Inter-Ikea Systems BV v OHIM (IDEA/IKEA) [2009] ETMR 17.
[288]
1988. Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
[289]
2005. Douglas and Zeta Jones v Hello! Ltd [2005] 4 All ER 128.
[290]
2007. Dyson Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks (Case C-321/03) - [2007] ETMR 34.
[291]
2007. Dyson Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks (Case C-321/03) - [2007] ETMR 34.
[292]
1979. *Erven Warnink vs Townend [1979] A.C. 731.
[293]
1979. *Erven Warnink vs Townend [1979] A.C. 731.
[294]
1979. *Erven Warnink vs Townend [1979] A.C. 731.
[295]
1990. Express Newspapers plc v News (UK) Ltd and others - [1990] 3 All ER 376.
[296]
1990. Express Newspapers plc v News (UK) Ltd and others - [1990] 3 All ER 376.
[297]
2010. Google France SARL and another v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA Google France SARL v Viaticum SA and another Google France SARL v Centre national de recherche en relations humaines (CNRRH) SARL and others - [2010] All ER (D) 23 (Apr).
[298]
2010. Google France SARL and another v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA Google France SARL v Viaticum SA and another Google France SARL v Centre national de recherche en relations humaines (CNRRH) SARL and others - [2010] All ER (D) 23 (Apr).
[299]
2008. Honestly, neither Celine nor Gillette is defensible! European Intellectual Property Review. 30, 7 (2008), 286–293.
[300]
2009. *Infopaq International v Danske Dagblades Forening (Case C-5/08).
[301]
2002. Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd (Case C-299/99) - [2003] Ch 159.
[302]
2004. *Libertel Groep BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau (Case C-104/01) - [2004] Ch 83.
[303]
2004. *Libertel Groep BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau (Case C-104/01) - [2004] Ch 83.
[304]
2003. *Libertel v Benelux Merkenbureau (Case C-104/01) [2003] ECR I-3793 [2003] ETMR 63.
[305]
2000. Marca Mode CV v Adidas AG and Adidas Benelux (Case C-425/98 ).
[306]
1983. Merchandising Corporation of America v Harpbond [1983] FSR 32.
[307]
2001. Merz & Krell (Case C-517/99) [2001] ECR I-6959.
[308]
1997. Metix (UK) Ltd v G.H. Maughan (Plastics) Ltd [1997] FSR 718.
[309]
Module Outline & Reading for TERM 1.
[310]
1988. Mothercare v Penguin Books [1988] R.P.C. 113.
[311]
2012. *Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Meltwater Holding BV [2012] RPC 1.
[312]
2012. *Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Meltwater Holding BV [2012] RPC 1.
[313]
2009. Silberquelle GmbH v Maselli-Strickmode GmbH (C-495/07).
[314]
2008. Trade Marks Directive 2008.
[315]
2008. Trade Marks Directive 2008.
[316]
1916. University of London Press v University Tutorial Press [1916] 2 Ch 601.
[317]
1916. University of London Press v University Tutorial Press [1916] 2 Ch 601.
[318]
1916. University of London Press v University Tutorial Press [1916] 2 Ch 601.
[319]
1900. Walter v Lane [1900] AC 539.
[320]
1900. Walter v Lane [1900] AC 539.
