1
Module Outline & Reading for TERM 1.
2
Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, David, Aplin, Tanya Frances. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2013.
3
Bently, Lionel, Sherman, Brad. Intellectual property law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
4
Christie, Andrew, Gare, Stephen. Blackstone’s statutes on intellectual property. 11th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
5
Dowie-Whybrow M. Core statutes on intellectual property. Fourth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
6
Jacob, Robin, Alexander, Daniel, Fisher, Matthew. Guidebook to intellectual property. 6th ed. Oxford: Hart 2013.
7
Spence, Michael. Intellectual property. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
8
Waelde, Charlotte. Contemporary intellectual property: law and policy. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.
9
Bainbridge, David I. Intellectual property. 9th ed. Harlow: Pearson 2012.
10
Torremans, Paul, Holyoak, Jon. Holyoak and Torremans intellectual property law. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
11
Terrell, Thomas, Thorley, Simon. Terrell on the law of patents. 16th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2006.
12
Fysh, Michael, Roughton, Ashley, Johnson, Phillip, et al. The modern law of patents. 2nd ed. London: LexisNexis 2010.
13
Kitchin, David, Kerly, Duncan Mackenzie, Jacob, Robin. Kerly’s law of trade marks and trade names. 14th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2005.
14
Morcom, Christopher. The modern law of trade marks. 2nd ed. London: LexisNexis Butterworths 2005.
15
Garnett, K. M., Davies, Gillian, Harbottle, Gwilym, et al. Copinger and Skone James on copyright. 16th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2011.
16
Laddie, Hugh. The modern law of copyright and designs. London: Butterworths 2000.
17
Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, David, Aplin, Tanya Frances. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2013.
18
Bently, Lionel, Sherman, Brad. Intellectual property law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
19
Jacob, Robin, Alexander, Daniel, Fisher, Matthew. Guidebook to intellectual property. 6th ed. Oxford: Hart 2013.
20
Spence, Michael. Intellectual property. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
21
Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, David, Aplin, Tanya Frances. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2013.
22
Bently, Lionel, Sherman, Brad. Intellectual property law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
23
Richard Arnold. Confidence in exclusives: Douglas v Hello! in the House of Lords. European Intellectual Property Review. 2007;29:339–43.
24
Tanya Aplin. The development of the action for breach of confidence in a post-HRA era. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2007;19.
25
Gavin Phillipson. Transforming breach of confidence? Towards a common law right of privacy under the Human Rights Act. Modern Law Review. 2003;66:726–58.
26
Rachael Mulheron. A potential framework for privacy? A reply to Hello! Modern Law Review. 2006;69:679–713.
27
Alexandra Sims. ‘A shift in the centre of gravity’: the dangers of protecting privacy through breach of confidence. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2005;1:27–51.
28
N.A. Moreham. Privacy in the common law: a doctrinal and theoretical analysis. Law Quarterly Review. 2005;121:628–56.
29
Court: English court pre-dating November 1874. Albert (Prince) v Strange (1849) 18 LJ Ch 120, 1 H & Tw 1. 1849.
30
Court: Court of Appeal. Seager v Copydex Ltd [1967] 2 All ER 415, [1967] 1 WLR 923. 1967.
31
Court: House of Lords. *Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UK HL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457. 2004.
32
Court: Chancery Division. *Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1968] FSR 415, [1969] RPC 41. 1969.
33
Court: Court of Appeal. Seager v Copydex Ltd [1967] 2 All ER 415, [1967] 1 WLR 923. 1967.
34
Court: Chancery Division. *Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1968] FSR 415, [1969] RPC 41. 1969.
35
AG v Guardian Newspapers [1990] AC 109. 1990.
36
Queen’s Bench Division. Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EMLR 20. 2008.
37
Chancery Division. De Maudsley v Palumbo [1996] FSR 447. 1996.
38
Court: English court pre-dating November 1874. Albert (Prince) v Strange (1849) 18 LJ Ch 120, 1 H & Tw 1. 1849.
39
AG v Guardian Newspapers [1990] AC 109. 1990.
40
Court: Chancery Division. *Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1968] FSR 415, [1969] RPC 41. 1969.
41
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). *Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler [1987] Ch 117. 1987.
42
AG v Guardian Newspapers [1990] AC 109. 1990.
43
AG v Guardian Newspapers [1990] AC 109. 1990.
44
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Woodward v Hutchins [1977] 2 All ER 751; [1977] 1 WLR 760. 1977.
45
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Douglas v Hello! Ltd [2005] 4 All ER 128; [2005] 3 WLR 881. 2005.
46
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Lion Laboratories Ltd v Evans [1984] 2 All ER 417. 1984.
47
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Kaye v Robertson [1991] FSR 62. 1991.
48
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No.1) QB 967, [2001] 2 WLR 992. 2001.
49
House of Lords. OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, HL. 2008.
50
House of Lords. Wainwright v Home Office (AC 406). 2003.
51
European Court of Human Rights. *Von Hannover v Germany (59320/00) (2004) 40 EHRR 1. 2004.
52
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). HRH Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] Ch 57, [2007] 3 WLR 222. 2008.
53
Court: House of Lords. *Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UK HL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457. 2004.
54
House of Lords. S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 AC 593. 2005.
55
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). *Murray v Express Newspapers Plc [2009] Ch 481. 2009.
56
Queen’s Bench Division. *Spelman v Express Newspapers [2012] EWHC 355. 2012.
57
European Court of Human Rights. *Von Hannover v Germany (59320/00) (2004) 40 EHRR 1. 2004.
58
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Donald v Ntuli [2011] 1 WLR 294. 2011.
59
European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber). Axel Springer v Germany [2012] EMLR 15. 2012.
60
European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber). Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) [2012] EMLR 16. 2012.
61
Queen’s Bench Division. *Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB), [2008] EMLR 20. 2008.
62
European Court of Human Rights. Mosley v United Kingdom [2012] EMLR 1. 2011.
63
Court: House of Lords. *Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UK HL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457. 2004.
64
Douglas and Zeta Jones v Hello! Ltd [2005] 4 All ER 128. 2005.
65
Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, David, Aplin, Tanya Frances. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2013.
66
Bently, Lionel, Sherman, Brad. Intellectual property law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
67
Wadlow, Christopher. The law of passing-off: unfair competition by misrepresentation. 3rd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2004.
68
Ricketson S. Reaping without sowing: Unfair Competition and Intellectual Property Rights in Anglo-Australian Law. University of New South Wales Law Journal. 1984;7.
69
Jennifer Davis. Why the United Kingdom should have a law against misappropriation. Cambridge Law Journal. 2010;69:561–81.
70
Christopher Wadlow. Passing off at the crossroads again: a review article for Hazel Carty, An Analysis of the Economic Torts. European Intellectual Property Review. 2011;33:447–55.
71
*Erven Warnink vs Townend [1979] A.C. 731. 1979.
72
House of Lords. *Reckitt & Colman v Borden [1990] RPC 341; [1990] 1 WLR 491. 1990.
73
Court: House of Lords. IRC v Muller & Co’s Margarine Ltd [1901] AC 217. 1901.
74
*Erven Warnink vs Townend [1979] A.C. 731. 1979.
75
House of Lords. *Reddaway v Banham [1896] AC 199. 1896.
76
Court: House of Lords. Edge (William) & Sons Ltd v William Niccolls & Sons Ltd [1911] AC 693. 1911.
77
Court of Session (Outer House). John Haig & Co Ltd v Forth Blending Co Ltd (1953) 70 RPC 259. 1953.
78
House of Lords. *Reckitt & Colman v Borden [1990] RPC 341; [1990] 1 WLR 491. 1990.
79
Privy Council. Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Pub Squash Co Pty Ltd [1981] 1 WLR 193 (PC). 1981.
80
Court: Chancery Division. Bollinger v Costa Brava Wine Co Ltd [1961] RPC 116. 1961.
81
Court: Chancery Division. Vine Products Ltd v Mackenzie & Co Ltd [1969] RPC 1. 1969.
82
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Diageo v Intercontinental Brands [2010] ETMR 57. 2010.
83
Court: Court of Appeal. Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik, Budweiser Case [1984] FSR 413. 1984.
84
Chancery Division. Waterman (Pete) Ltd v CBS United Kingdom Ltd [1993] EMLR 27. 1993.
85
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Hotel Cipriani Srl v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd [2010] RPC 16. 2010.
86
Court: House of Lords. *Spalding (A.G.) & Bros v A.W. Gamage Ltd and Benetfink & Co Ltd (1915) 32 RPC 273 (HL). 1915.
87
Chancery Division. *Irvine v Talksport Ltd [2002] 1 WLR 2355. 2002.
88
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Taittinger SA v Allbev Ltd [1993] FSR 641. 1993.
89
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Harrods v Harrodian School [1996] RPC 697. 1996.
90
H1 Appeal from the High Court (Chancery Division). Arsenal v Reed [2003] RPC 39. 2003.
91
Court: Court of Appeal. *L’Oreal SA v Bellure NV [2007] EWCA Civ 968, [2008] RPC 196. 2007.
92
*Erven Warnink vs Townend [1979] A.C. 731. 1979.
93
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Taittinger SA v Allbev Ltd [1993] FSR 641. 1993.
94
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Taittinger SA v Allbev Ltd [1993] FSR 641. 1993.
95
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Harrods v Harrodian School [1996] RPC 697. 1996.
96
Chancery Division. *Irvine v Talksport Ltd [2002] 1 WLR 2355. 2002.
97
Bently, Lionel, Sherman, Brad. Intellectual property law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
98
Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, David, Aplin, Tanya Frances. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2013.
99
Jochen Pagenberg. Trade dress and the three dimensional mark - the neglected children of trade mark law? International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2004;35:831–43.
100
Bergquist J, Curley D. Shape trade marks and fast-moving consumer goods. European Intellectual Property Review. 2008;17–24.
101
Liakatou V, Maniatis S. Lego - building a European concept of functionality. European Intellectual Property Review. 2010;32:653–6.
102
Jeremy Phillips. Trade mark law and the need to keep free. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2005;36:389–401.
103
Davis J. The Need to Leave Free for Others to Use and the Trade Mark Common. Trade mark use. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005.
104
Patricia Loughlan. Descriptive trade marks, fair use and consumer confusion. European Intellectual Property Review. 2005;27:443–5.
105
Intellectual Property Office. Trade Marks Act 1994. 1994.
106
Trade Marks Directive 2008. 2008.
107
Court: European Court of Justice. Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV: C-342/97 [1999] ECR I-3819, [1999] All ER (EC) 587. 1999.
108
Intellectual Property Office. Trade Marks Act 1994. 1994.
109
Trade Marks Directive 2008. 2008.
110
European Court of Justice. *Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (C-273/00) [2002] ECR I-11737; [2003] ETMR 37. 2002.
111
Dyson Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks (Case C-321/03) - [2007] ETMR 34. 2007.
112
European Court of Justice. *Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (C-273/00) [2002] ECR I-11737; [2003] ETMR 37. 2002.
113
European Court of Justice. *Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (C-273/00) [2002] ECR I-11737; [2003] ETMR 37. 2002.
114
Court of First Instance. Eden SARL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) [2006] (T-305/04) ETMR 14. 2006.
115
European Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber). Shield Mark BV v Joost Kist H.O.D.N. Memex (Case C-283/01) [2004] ETMR 33. 2004.
116
*Libertel v Benelux Merkenbureau (Case C-104/01) [2003] ECR I-3793 [2003] ETMR 63. 2003.
117
European Court of Justice. *Koninklijke Philips v Remington (Case C-299/99) [2002] ECR I-5475, [2002] ETMR 81. 2002.
118
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber). SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v OHIM (Case C-329/02) (SAT.2), [2005] 1 CMLR 1546. 2005.
119
*Libertel Groep BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau (Case C-104/01) - [2004] Ch 83. 2004.
120
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber). SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v OHIM (Case C-329/02) (SAT.2), [2005] 1 CMLR 1546. 2005.
121
Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd (Case C-299/99) - [2003] Ch 159. 2002.
122
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber). SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v OHIM (Case C-329/02) (SAT.2), [2005] 1 CMLR 1546. 2005.
123
*Libertel Groep BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau (Case C-104/01) - [2004] Ch 83. 2004.
124
European Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber). Procter & Gamble v OHIM (Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P) [2004] ETMR 89. 2004.
125
Court: European Court of Justice. *Linde AG, Winward Industries Inc & Rado Uhren AG v Deutsches Patentund Markenamt (Cases C-53/01, 54/01 & 55/01) [2003] ECR-I 3161, [2003] RPC 803. 2003.
126
European Court of Justice. *OHIM v Wm Wrigley Junior Co (DOUBLEMINT) (Case C-191/01 P) [2004] RPC 327, [2004] 1 WLR 1728. 2004.
127
European Court of Justice. Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions und Vertriebs GmbH v Boots und Segelzubehor Walter Huber (Cases C-108/97 and 109/97) [1999] ECR I-2779, [2000] 2 WLR 205. 1999.
128
European Court of Justice. Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions und Vertriebs GmbH v Boots und Segelzubehor Walter Huber (Cases C-108/97 and 109/97) [1999] ECR I-2779, [2000] 2 WLR 205. 1999.
129
European Court of Justice. Procter & Gamble Company v OHIM (BABY DRY) (Case C-383/99 P) [2001] ECR I-6251, [2002] Ch 82. 2001.
130
European Court of Justice. *OHIM v Wm Wrigley Junior Co (DOUBLEMINT) (Case C-191/01 P) [2004] RPC 327, [2004] 1 WLR 1728. 2004.
131
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber). SAT.1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v OHIM (Case C-329/02) (SAT.2), [2005] 1 CMLR 1546. 2005.
132
Merz & Krell (Case C-517/99) [2001] ECR I-6959. 2001.
133
European Court of Justice. *Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions und Vertriebs GmbH v Boots und Segelzubehor Walter Huber (Cases C-108/97 and 109/97) [1999] ECR I-2779, [2000] 2 WLR 205. 1999.
134
European Court of Justice. Philips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd (Case C-299/99) [2002] ECR I-5475, [2002] All ER (EC) 634, [2002] 2 CMLR 1329. 2002.
135
Dyson Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks (Case C-321/03) - [2007] ETMR 34. 2007.
136
European Court of Justice. *Koninklijke Philips v Remington (Case C-299/99) [2002] ECR I-5475, [2002] ETMR 81. 2002.
137
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber). *Lego Juris v OHIM (Case C-48/09 P) [2010] ETMR 63. 2010.
138
Trade Marks Registry (Appointed Person). Re Ghazilian’s Trade Mark Application [2002] RPC 33. 2002.
139
Trade Marks Registry (Appointed Person). Re Basic Trademark SA’s Trade Mark Application [2005] RPC 25. 2005.
140
Trade Marks Registry (Appointed Person). Dennis Woodman v French Connection [2007] RPC 1. 2007.
141
Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, David, Aplin, Tanya Frances. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2013.
142
Bently, Lionel, Sherman, Brad. Intellectual property law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
143
Andrew Griffiths. The impact of the global appreciation approach on the boundaries of trade mark protection. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2001;326–60.
144
Phillips, Jeremy. Trade mark law: a practical anatomy. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press 2003.
145
Joshi R, Isaac B. What does identical mean? European Intellectual Property Review. 2005;27:184–7.
146
Phillips J. Strong trade marks and the likelihood of confusion in European law. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. ;1:385–97. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpl038
147
Schechter F. The Rational Basis of Trade Mark Protection. Harvard Law Review. 1927;40.
148
Gangjee D, Burrell R. Because You’re Worth It: L’Oreal and the Prohibition on Free Riding. Modern Law Review. ;73:282–95. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2010.00794.x
149
Court: European Court of Justice. Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV: C-342/97 [1999] ECR I-3819, [1999] All ER (EC) 587. 1999.
150
*Case C-291/00 LTJ Diffusion v Sadas Vertbaudet, [2003] ECR I-2799, [2003] ETMR 83. 2003.
151
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Reed Executive Plc v Reed Business Information Ltd [2004] ETMR 56. 2004.
152
European Court of Justice. *Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma [1997] ECR I-6191, [1998] ETMR 1. 1998.
153
Court: Court of First Instance, EC. Les Editions Albert Rene v OHIM (Case T-336/03) [2005] ECR II-4667. 2005.
154
Court: European Court of Justice. Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV: C-342/97 [1999] ECR I-3819, [1999] All ER (EC) 587. 1999.
155
European Court of Justice. *Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1. 1999.
156
Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market (Opposition Division). Zanella SNC’s Community Trade Mark Application (B.42053) [2000] ETMR 69. 2000.
157
European Court of Justice. *Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma [1997] ECR I-6191, [1998] ETMR 1. 1998.
158
Marca Mode CV v Adidas AG and Adidas Benelux (Case C-425/98 ). 2000.
159
European Court of Justice. *Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1. 1999.
160
Court: European Court of Justice. Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV: C-342/97 [1999] ECR I-3819, [1999] All ER (EC) 587. 1999.
161
European Court of Justice. *Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma [1997] ECR I-6191, [1998] ETMR 1. 1998.
162
European Court of Justice. *Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1. 1999.
163
European Court of Justice. *Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1. 1999.
164
European Court of Justice. *Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1. 1999.
165
Case T-387/06 Inter-Ikea Systems BV v OHIM (IDEA/IKEA) [2009] ETMR 17. 2009.
166
Advocate Generals Opinion. *Case C-292/00 Davidoff & Cie SA, Zino Davidoff SA v Gofkid Ltd [2003] ECR I 389, [2002] ETMR 99. 2002.
167
European Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber). *Case C-408/01 Adidas-Salomon AG & Adidas Benelux BV v Fitnessworld Trading Ltd [2004] ETMR 10. 2004.
168
European Court of Justice (Sixth Chamber). *Case C-408/01 Adidas-Salomon AG & Adidas Benelux BV v Fitnessworld Trading Ltd [2004] ETMR 10. 2004.
169
European Court of Justice. Case C-375/97 General Motors v Yplon [2000] RPC 572. 2000.
170
Chancery Division. Julius Sämann Ltd v Tetrosyl Ltd [2006] EWHC 529. 2006.
171
European Court of Justice (First Chamber). Case C-323/09 Interflora v Marks & Spencer plc [2012] ETMR 1. 2012.
172
*Case C-252/07 Intel Corporation Inc v CPM United Kingdom Ltd [2009] ETMR 13. 2009.
173
Benelux Court of Justice. Colgate-Palmolive BV v Koninklijke Distilleerderijen Erven Lucas Bols NV (1976) 7 IIC 420 (CLAERYN/KLAREIN). 1979.
174
European Court of Justice (First Chamber). Case C-487/07 L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV [2009] ECR I-5185; [2010] RPC 1; [2009] ETMR 55 (ECJ). 2009.
175
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV [2010] ETMR 47 (Court of Appeal). 2010.
176
Intellectual Property Office. Trade Marks Act 1994. 1994.
177
Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, David, Aplin, Tanya Frances. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2013.
178
Bently, Lionel, Sherman, Brad. Intellectual property law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
179
Helen Norman. Time to blow the whistle on trade mark use? Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2004;1–34.
180
Ilanah Simon. How does ‘essential function’ doctrine drive European mark trade law? International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2005;401–20.
181
Andrew Griffiths. The trade mark monopoly: an analysis of the core zone of absolute protection under Art.5(1)(a). Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2007;3:312–49.
182
M. Senftlebel. Bringing EU Trademark Law Back Into Shape – Lessons to Learn from Keyword Advertising. 2011.
183
Andrew Griffiths. The trade mark monopoly: an analysis of the core zone of absolute protection under Art.5(1)(a). Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2007;3:312–49.
184
Mothercare v Penguin Books [1988] R.P.C. 113. 1988.
185
Helen Norman. Time to blow the whistle on trade mark use? Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2004;1–34.
186
*Case C-291/00 LTJ Diffusion v Sadas Vertbaudet, [2003] ECR I-2799, [2003] ETMR 83. 2003.
187
European Court of Justice. Case C-63/97 BMW v Deenik [1999] ECR I-905, [1999] 1 CMLR 1099. 1999.
188
European Court of Justice. Case C-2/00 Hölterhoff v Ulrich Freiesleben [2002] ETMR 917. 2002.
189
European Court of Justice. *Case C-206/01 Arsenal Football Club plc v Reed, [2002] ECR I-10273, [2003] ETMR 19 (ECJ). 2003.
190
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). *Arsenal Football Club plc v Reed [2003] ETMR 73 (CA). 2003.
191
House of Lords. *R v Johnstone [2004] ETMR 2. 2004.
192
Case C-48/05 Adam Opel v Autec [2007] ETMR 33. 2007.
193
Google France SARL and another v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA Google France SARL v Viaticum SA and another Google France SARL v Centre national de recherche en relations humaines (CNRRH) SARL and others - [2010] All ER (D) 23 (Apr). 2010.
194
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber). Case C-17/06 Céline v Céline SA [2007] ECR I-7041, [2007] ETMR 80. 2007.
195
Chancery Division. RxWorks Ltd v Hunter [2007] EWHC 3061. 2007.
196
Google France SARL and another v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA Google France SARL v Viaticum SA and another Google France SARL v Centre national de recherche en relations humaines (CNRRH) SARL and others - [2010] All ER (D) 23 (Apr). 2010.
197
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber). Case C-324/09 L’Oreal SA v eBay International AG [2011] ETMR 53. 2011.
198
European Court of Justice (First Chamber). Case C-323/09 Interflora v Marks & Spencer plc [2012] ETMR 1. 2012.
199
Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, David, Aplin, Tanya Frances. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2013.
200
Bently, Lionel, Sherman, Brad. Intellectual property law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
201
Roughton A. Permitted Infringing Use: the Scope of Defences to an Infringement Action. Trade mark use. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005.
202
Ilanah Simon. Nominative use and honest practices in industrial and commercial matters - a very European history. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2007;117–47.
203
Honestly, neither Celine nor Gillette is defensible! European Intellectual Property Review. 2008;30:286–93.
204
Christophe Geiger. Trade marks and freedom of expression - the proportionality of criticism. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2007;38:317–27.
205
Claire Howell. Trade marks: what constitutes ‘genuine use’? Laboratoires Goemar SA v La Mer Technology. European Intellectual Property Review. 2006;28:118–21.
206
Phillips, Jeremy. Trade mark law: a practical anatomy. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press 2003.
207
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber). Case C-17/06 Céline v Céline SA [2007] ECR I-7041, [2007] ETMR 80. 2007.
208
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Hotel Cipriani Srl v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd [2010] RPC 16. 2010.
209
Patents County Court. Redd Solicitors LLP v Red Legal Ltd [2012] EWPCC 54, [2013] ETMR 13. 2013.
210
Case C-48/05 Adam Opel v Autec [2007] ETMR 33. 2007.
211
European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber). Case C-100/02 Gerolsteiner & Brunnen GmbH & Co. v Putsch GmbH [2004] ETMR 40. 2004.
212
European Court of Justice (Third Chamber). *Case 228/03 Gillette Company v LA-Laboratories Ltd Case [2005] ETMR 67. 2005.
213
European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber). Case C-100/02 Gerolsteiner & Brunnen GmbH & Co. v Putsch GmbH [2004] ETMR 40. 2004.
214
European Court of Justice (Third Chamber). *Case 228/03 Gillette Company v LA-Laboratories Ltd Case [2005] ETMR 67. 2005.
215
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber). Case C-17/06 Céline v Céline SA [2007] ECR I-7041, [2007] ETMR 80. 2007.
216
European Court of Justice (First Chamber). Case C-487/07 L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV [2009] ECR I-5185; [2010] RPC 1; [2009] ETMR 55 (ECJ). 2009.
217
Dowie-Whybrow M. Core statutes on intellectual property. Fourth edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
218
European Court of Justice (First Chamber). *Case C-533/06 O2 Holdings Ltd v Hutchison 3G UK Ltd [2008] ETMR 55. 2008.
219
European Court of Justice (First Chamber). Case C-487/07 L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV [2009] ECR I-5185; [2010] RPC 1; [2009] ETMR 55 (ECJ). 2009.
220
European Court of Justice. *Case C-40/01 Ansul BV and Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (Minimax) [2003] ECR I-2439, [2003] ETMR 85. 2003.
221
European Court of Justice (Third Chamber). Case C-259/02 La Mer Technology Inc v Laboratoires Goemar SA [2004] ETMR 47. 2004.
222
Silberquelle GmbH v Maselli-Strickmode GmbH (C-495/07). 2009.
223
European Court of Justice (Third Chamber). Case C-246/05 Armin Häupl v Lidl Stiftung & Co KG [2007] ETMR 61. 2007.
224
Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, David, Aplin, Tanya Frances. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2013.
225
Bently, Lionel, Sherman, Brad. Intellectual property law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
226
Stothers, Christopher. Parallel trade in Europe: intellectual property, competition and regulatory law. Oxford: Hart 2007.
227
Gill Grassie. Parallel imports and trade marks - where are we? Part 1. European Intellectual Property Review. 2006;28:474–9.
228
Gill Grassie. Parallel imports and trade marks: Part 2: the repackaging cases. European Intellectual Property Review. 2006;28:513–6.
229
Keeling, David T. Intellectual property rights in EU law: Vol. 1: Free movement and competition law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2003.
230
Fhima IS. The Court of Justice’s protection of the advertising function of trade marks: an (almost) sceptical analysis. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2011;6:325–9. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpr004
231
European Court of Justice. Case 8/74 Procureur du Roi v Dassonville [1974] ECR 837 at 852, [1974] 2 CMLR 436. 1974.
232
European Court of Justice. Cases C-15 & 16/74 Centrafarm v Sterling Drug, Centrafarm v Winthrop [1974] ECR 1147, 1183, [1974] 2 CMLR 480. 1974.
233
European Court of Justice. Case C-317/91 Deutsche Renault AG v Audi AG [1993] ECR I-6227, [1995] 1 CMLR 461. 1995.
234
European Court of Justice. Case C-355/96 Silhouette International Schmied GmbH v Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft mbH [1998] ECR I-4799, [1998] 2 CMLR 953. 1998.
235
European Court of Justice. *Case C-414/99 Zino Davidoff SA v A&G Imports Ltd [2001] ECR I-8691, [2002] Ch 109, [2002] 1 CMLR 1. 2002.
236
European Court of Justice. *Case C-414/99 Zino Davidoff SA v A&G Imports Ltd [2001] ECR I-8691, [2002] Ch 109, [2002] 1 CMLR 1. 2002.
237
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Mastercigars Direct Ltd v Hunters and Frankau [2007] ETMR 54. 2007.
238
European Court of Justice (Fifth Chamber). Case C-173/98 Sebago Inc and Ancienne Maison Dubois v GB Unic SA [1999] ETMR 681. 1999.
239
European Court of Justice. *Case C–16/03 Peak Holding v Axolin-Elinor [2004] ECR I–11313, [2005] Ch 261, [2005] 2 WLR 650. 2005.
240
Case C-324/09 L’Oréal v eBay International [2011] RPC 27. 2011.
241
Case C-59/08 Copad SA v Christian Dior Couture [2009] FSR 859 (22). 2009.
242
European Court of Justice. *Case C-427/93 Bristol-Myers Squibb v Paranova [1996] ECR I-3457, [1997] 1 CMLR 1151. 1997.
243
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber). *Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52. 2007.
244
European Court of Justice. Case C-379/97 Pharmacia & Upjohn SA v Paranova A/S ("Paranova II”)[1999] ECR I-6927, [2000] 1 CMLR 51. 2000.
245
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber). *Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52. 2007.
246
European Court of Justice. *Case C-427/93 Bristol-Myers Squibb v Paranova [1996] ECR I-3457, [1997] 1 CMLR 1151. 1997.
247
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber). *Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52. 2007.
248
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward [2008] EWCA Civ 83, [2008] ETMR 36. 2008.
249
European Court of Justice. *Case C-143/00 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer I”) [2002] ECR I-3759, [2002] All ER (EC) 581. 2002.
250
Chancery Division (Patents Court). Glaxo Group Ltd v Dowelhurst Ltd (No 2) [2000] FSR 529. 2000.
251
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber). *Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52. 2007.
252
European Court of Justice (Second Chamber). *Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52. 2007.
253
Advocate Generals Opinion. *Case C-337/95 Parfums Christian Dior SA v Evora BV [1997] ECR I-1603. 1997.
254
Case C-59/08 Copad SA v Christian Dior Couture [2009] FSR 859 (22). 2009.
255
Case C-324/09 L’Oréal v eBay International [2011] RPC 27. 2011.
256
Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, David, Aplin, Tanya Frances. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2013.
257
Bently, Lionel, Sherman, Brad. Intellectual property law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
258
Pila J. Copyright and Its Categories of Original Works. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. ;30:229–54. doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqq009
259
Spence M. Justifying Copyright. Dear images: art, copyright and culture. London: Ridinghouse:, ICA 2002:389–403.
260
Irini A. Stamatoudi. ‘Joy’ for the claimant: can a film also be protected as a dramatic work? Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2000;117–26.
261
Richard Arnold. Joy: a reply. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2001;10–21.
262
Richard Arnold. Copyright in photographs: a case for reform. European Intellectual Property Review. 2005;27:303–5.
263
Andreas Rahmatian. Music and creativity as perceived by copyright law. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2005;267–93.
264
Tania S.L. Cheng. Does copyright law confer a monopoly over unpreserved cows? European Intellectual Property Review. 2006;276–81.
265
Silver I, Lee P. Protecting your Rights – Copyright in Computer Games: Nova Productions and Mazooma Games Ltd. European Intellectual Property Review. 2007;29:251–5.
266
Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. 1988.
267
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). *Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2) [1999] FSR 79, [2000] FSR 363 (CA). 2000.
268
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Baigent & Leigh v Random House [2007] EWCA Civ 247, [2007] FSR 24. 2007.
269
Chancery Division. Nova Productions Ltd v. Mazooma Games Ltd [2006] RPC 14. 2006.
270
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Nova Productions Ltd v. Mazooma Games Ltd [2007] RPC 25. 2007.
271
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Exxon Corp v Exxon Insurance Consultants International Ltd [1982] Ch 119. 1982.
272
University of London Press v University Tutorial Press [1916] 2 Ch 601. 1916.
273
*Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Meltwater Holding BV [2012] RPC 1. 2012.
274
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). *Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2) [1999] FSR 79, [2000] FSR 363 (CA). 2000.
275
Chancery Division. Nova Productions Ltd v. Mazooma Games Ltd [2006] RPC 14. 2006.
276
Chancery Division. Lawson v Dundas. 1985.
277
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). *Sawkins v Hyperion Records [2005] RPC 32; [2005] 1 WLR 3281. 2005.
278
Chancery Division. Creation Records v News Group Newspapers [1997] EMLR 444. 1997.
279
Metix (UK) Ltd v G.H. Maughan (Plastics) Ltd [1997] FSR 718. 1997.
280
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Nova Productions Ltd v. Mazooma Games Ltd [2007] RPC 25 (CA). 2007.
281
Court: Chancery Division. British Northrop Ltd v Texteam Blackburn Ltd [1974] RPC 57. 1974.
282
Merchandising Corporation of America v Harpbond [1983] FSR 32. 1983.
283
Supreme Court. *Lucasfilms v Ainsworth [2009] FSR 2. 2009.
284
Supreme Court. *Lucasfilms v Ainsworth [2009] FSR 2. 2009.
285
House of Lords. George Hensher Ltd v Restawile Upholstery (Lancs) Ltd [1976] AC 64. 1976.
286
University of London Press v University Tutorial Press [1916] 2 Ch 601. 1916.
287
House of Lords. Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 273. 1964.
288
Walter v Lane [1900] AC 539. 1900.
289
Express Newspapers plc v News (UK) Ltd and others - [1990] 3 All ER 376. 1990.
290
Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, David, Aplin, Tanya Frances. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2013.
291
Bently, Lionel, Sherman, Brad. Intellectual property law. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
292
Nigel P. Gravells. Authorship and originality: the persistent influence of Walter v Lane. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2007;3:267–93.
293
Zemer L. Contribution and collaboration in joint authorship: too many misconceptions. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. ;1:283–92. doi: 10.1093/jiplp/jpl005
294
Rebecca Baines. Copyright in commissioned works: a cause for uncertainty. European Intellectual Property Review. 2005;27:122–3.
295
David Booton. The informal acquisition of copyright. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2011;1:28–49.
296
Laddie, Justice. Copyright: over-strength, over-regulated, over-rated? European Intellectual Property Review. 1996;18:253–60.
297
Helberger N, Dufft N, Van Gompel S, et al. Never forever: why extending the term of protection for sound recordings is a bad idea. European Intellectual Property Review. 2008;30:174–81.
298
Estelle Derclaye. Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening (C-5/08): wonderful or worrisome? The impact of the ECJ ruling in Infopaq on UK copyright law. European Intellectual Property Review. 2010;247–51.
299
University of London Press v University Tutorial Press [1916] 2 Ch 601. 1916.
300
House of Lords. Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 273. 1964.
301
Walter v Lane [1900] AC 539. 1900.
302
Express Newspapers plc v News (UK) Ltd and others - [1990] 3 All ER 376. 1990.
303
Privy Council (Hong Kong). *Interlego AG v Tyco Industries Inc [1989] AC 217. 1989.
304
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). *Sawkins v Hyperion Records [2005] RPC 32; [2005] 1 WLR 3281. 2005.
305
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). ZYX Music GmbH v King [1995] 3 All ER 1, [1997] 2 All ER 129. 1997.
306
Chancery Division. Antiquesportfolio.Com Plc v. Rodney Fitch & Company Limited [2001] ECDR 5. 2001.
307
European Court of Justice (Third Chamber). *Case C-145/10 Eva-Maria Painer v Standard Verlags GmbH, [2012] ECDR 6. 2012.
308
Patents County Court. *Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas Ltd [2012] FSR 9. 2012.
309
*Infopaq International v Danske Dagblades Forening (Case C-5/08). 2009.
310
European Court of Justice (Third Chamber). *Case C-145/10 Eva-Maria Painer v Standard Verlags GmbH, [2012] ECDR 6. 2012.
311
*Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Meltwater Holding BV [2012] RPC 1. 2012.
312
House of Lords. Newspaper Licensing Agency v Marks & Spencer Plc [2001] Ch 257 (CA); [2003] 1 AC 551 (HL). 2003.
313
Chancery Division. *Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622. 1998.
314
Chancery Division. Brighton v Jones [2005] FSR 16. 2005.
315
Chancery Division. Hadley v Kemp [1999] EMLR 589. 1999.
316
House of Lords. Fisher v Brooker [2007] EMLR 9; [2007] FSR 12 (Ch D); [2008] EMLR 13 (CA); [2009] 1 WLR 1764 (HL). 2009.
317
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Beckingham v Hodgens [2003] ECDR 6 (Ch D); [2003] EMLR 18 (CA). 2003.
318
Court: Court of Appeal. Stevenson (or Stephenson) Jordan and Harrison Ltd v MacDonald and Evans (1952) 1 TLR 101. 1952.
319
Chancery Division. *Noah v Shuba [1991] FSR 14. 1991.
320
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Griggs Group Ltd v Evans [2005] FSR 31. 2005.