AG v Guardian Newspapers [1990] AC 109 (1990) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WR0-TXD8-61KW&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
—— (1990) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WR0-TXD8-61KW&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
—— (1990) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WR0-TXD8-61KW&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
—— (1990) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WR0-TXD8-61KW&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Alexandra Sims, ‘“A Shift in the Centre of Gravity”: The Dangers of Protecting Privacy through Breach of Confidence’ (2005) 1 Intellectual Property Quarterly 27 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=I84951700E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Andreas Rahmatian, ‘Music and Creativity as Perceived by Copyright Law’ [2005] Intellectual Property Quarterly 267 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/IBD9BC3D0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Andrew Griffiths, ‘The Impact of the Global Appreciation Approach on the Boundaries of Trade Mark Protection’ [2001] Intellectual Property Quarterly 326 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I80DC7BD0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
——, ‘The Trade Mark Monopoly: An Analysis of the Core Zone of Absolute Protection under Art.5(1)(a)’ (2007) 3 Intellectual Property Quarterly 312 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=I943CD4A0407811DCBD0B8974948FEEE1&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
——, ‘The Trade Mark Monopoly: An Analysis of the Core Zone of Absolute Protection under Art.5(1)(a)’ (2007) 3 Intellectual Property Quarterly 312 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=I943CD4A0407811DCBD0B8974948FEEE1&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Bainbridge, David I., Intellectual Property (9th ed, Pearson 2012)
Bently, Lionel and Sherman, Brad, Intellectual Property Law (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2009)
——, Intellectual Property Law (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2009)
——, Intellectual Property Law (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2009)
——, Intellectual Property Law (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2009)
——, Intellectual Property Law (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2009)
——, Intellectual Property Law (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2009)
——, Intellectual Property Law (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2009)
——, Intellectual Property Law (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2009)
——, Intellectual Property Law (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2009)
——, Intellectual Property Law (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2009)
——, Intellectual Property Law (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2009)
Bergquist J and Curley D, ‘Shape Trade Marks and Fast-Moving Consumer Goods’ [2008] European Intellectual Property Review 17 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I4605FB80A38411DCA386F3C91B230F0D/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Case C-48/05 Adam Opel v Autec [2007] ETMR 33 (2007) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IDB584410131811DCBED6E2488C9C88D7&amp;crumb-action=reset>
—— (2007) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IDB584410131811DCBED6E2488C9C88D7&amp;crumb-action=reset>
Case C-59/08 Copad SA v Christian Dior Couture [2009] FSR 859 (22) (2009) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE642516054A011DE99E188287EC57E09/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
—— (2009) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE642516054A011DE99E188287EC57E09/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
*Case C-252/07 Intel Corporation Inc v CPM United Kingdom Ltd [2009] ETMR 13 (2009) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE1F1D190EF4B11DDABD59220C1484B66&amp;crumb-action=reset>
Case C-324/09 L’Oréal v eBay International [2011] RPC 27 (2011) <http://indiancaselaws.wordpress.com/2013/09/14/loreal-sa-v-ebay-international-ag-c-32409/>
—— (2011) <http://indiancaselaws.wordpress.com/2013/09/14/loreal-sa-v-ebay-international-ag-c-32409/>
Case T-387/06 Inter-Ikea Systems BV v OHIM (IDEA/IKEA) [2009] ETMR 17 (2009) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE1F37F40EF4B11DDABD59220C1484B66&amp;crumb-action=reset>
Chancery Division, Lawson v Dundas (1985) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4PN7-RW10-TXX5-50FC&csi=316560&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Christie, Andrew and Gare, Stephen, Blackstone’s Statutes on Intellectual Property, vol Blackstone’s statutes (11th ed, Oxford University Press 2012)
Christophe Geiger, ‘Trade Marks and Freedom of Expression - the Proportionality of Criticism’ (2007) 38 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 317 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I2BE7DFB030C111DC94868C93E4A893F7/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Christopher Wadlow, ‘Passing off at the Crossroads Again: A Review Article for Hazel Carty, An Analysis of the Economic Torts’ (2011) 33 European Intellectual Property Review 447 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=I4CF8A4E0881111E0B370896DBAF0B922&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Claire Howell, ‘Trade Marks: What Constitutes “Genuine Use”? Laboratoires Goemar SA v La Mer Technology’ (2006) 28 European Intellectual Property Review 118 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=ICF32C710E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
‘Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988’ <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/contents>
Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, David, and Aplin, Tanya Frances, Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights (8th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2013)
——, Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights (8th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2013)
——, Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights (8th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2013)
——, Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights (8th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2013)
——, Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights (8th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2013)
——, Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights (8th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2013)
——, Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights (8th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2013)
——, Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights (8th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2013)
——, Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights (8th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2013)
——, Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights (8th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2013)
——, Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights (8th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2013)
Court: Chancery Division, Bollinger v Costa Brava Wine Co Ltd [1961] RPC 116 (1961) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXH-FGP0-TWW4-2113&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, *Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1968] FSR 415, [1969] RPC 41 (1969) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXH-FDF0-TWW4-205K&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, *Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1968] FSR 415, [1969] RPC 41 (1969) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXH-FDF0-TWW4-205K&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, *Coco v AN Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1968] FSR 415, [1969] RPC 41 (1969) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXH-FDF0-TWW4-205K&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, Vine Products Ltd v Mackenzie & Co Ltd [1969] RPC 1 (1969) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXN-BPC0-TWW4-219M&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, British Northrop Ltd v Texteam Blackburn Ltd [1974] RPC 57 (1974) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXH-FDW0-TWW4-20KN&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Court: Court of Appeal, Stevenson (or Stephenson) Jordan and Harrison Ltd v MacDonald and Evans (1952) 1 TLR 101 (1952) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YJ40-TWW4-20NH&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, Seager v Copydex Ltd [1967] 2 All ER 415, [1967] 1 WLR 923 (1967) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXH-FDF0-TWW4-204J&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, Seager v Copydex Ltd [1967] 2 All ER 415, [1967] 1 WLR 923 (1967) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXH-FDF0-TWW4-204J&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar Narodni Podnik, Budweiser Case [1984] FSR 413 (1984) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXV-YY50-TWW4-21H2&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, *L’Oreal SA v Bellure NV [2007] EWCA Civ 968, [2008] RPC 196 (2007) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4PWD-GRH0-TWW4-21F9&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Court: Court of First Instance, EC, Les Editions Albert Rene v OHIM (Case T-336/03) [2005] ECR II-4667 (2005) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4HF5-CB60-TWW4-215W&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Court: English court pre-dating November 1874, Albert (Prince) v Strange (1849) 18 LJ Ch 120, 1 H & Tw 1 (1849) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXH-FDY0-TWW4-20YP&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, Albert (Prince) v Strange (1849) 18 LJ Ch 120, 1 H & Tw 1 (1849) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXH-FDY0-TWW4-20YP&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Court: European Court of Justice, Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV: C-342/97 [1999] ECR I-3819, [1999] All ER (EC) 587 (1999) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXR-N2K0-TWW4-2006&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV: C-342/97 [1999] ECR I-3819, [1999] All ER (EC) 587 (1999) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXR-N2K0-TWW4-2006&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV: C-342/97 [1999] ECR I-3819, [1999] All ER (EC) 587 (1999) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXR-N2K0-TWW4-2006&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, Lloyd Schuhfabrik Meyer & Co GmbH v Klijsen Handel BV: C-342/97 [1999] ECR I-3819, [1999] All ER (EC) 587 (1999) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXR-N2K0-TWW4-2006&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, *Linde AG, Winward Industries Inc & Rado Uhren AG v Deutsches Patentund Markenamt (Cases C-53/01, 54/01 & 55/01) [2003] ECR-I 3161, [2003] RPC 803 (2003) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXV-47S0-TWW4-200W&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Court: House of Lords, IRC v Muller & Co’s Margarine Ltd [1901] AC 217 (1901) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXV-M7D0-TWW4-20B3&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, Edge (William) & Sons Ltd v William Niccolls & Sons Ltd [1911] AC 693 (1911) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXH-FG30-TWW4-21GN&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, *Spalding (A.G.) & Bros v A.W. Gamage Ltd and Benetfink & Co Ltd (1915) 32 RPC 273 (HL) (1915) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXR-6310-TWW4-20NS&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, *Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UK HL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457 (2004) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-JR30-TWW4-21G6&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, *Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UK HL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457 (2004) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-JR30-TWW4-21G6&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
——, *Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers Ltd [2004] UK HL 22, [2004] 2 AC 457 (2004) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-JR30-TWW4-21G6&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Lion Laboratories Ltd v Evans [1984] 2 All ER 417 (1984) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE12C1131E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&amp;crumb-action=reset>
——, *Murray v Express Newspapers Plc [2009] Ch 481 (2009) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF9C8BCC01CBA11DDB566FF76D66A7C56/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
——, Donald v Ntuli [2011] 1 WLR 294 (2011) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF83A68B0F1E011DF8DDEF4C61C812980/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
David Booton, ‘The Informal Acquisition of Copyright’ (2011) 1 Intellectual Property Quarterly 28 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=ID6711520345311E0BC47AA7F74E9E5E3&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Davis J, ‘The Need to Leave Free for Others to Use and the Trade Mark Common’, Trade mark use (Oxford University Press 2005)
Douglas and Zeta Jones v Hello! Ltd [2005] 4 All ER 128 (2005) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4H7S-JMY0-TWP1-605P&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Dowie-Whybrow M, Core Statutes on Intellectual Property, vol Palgrave Macmillan core statutes (Fourth edition, Palgrave Macmillan 2013)
——, Core Statutes on Intellectual Property, vol Palgrave Macmillan core statutes (Fourth edition, Palgrave Macmillan 2013)
Dyson Ltd v Registrar of Trade Marks (Case C-321/03) - [2007] ETMR 34 (2007) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=55Y7-JST1-DYBP-N4FG&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
—— (2007) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=55Y7-JST1-DYBP-N4FG&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
*Erven Warnink vs Townend [1979] A.C. 731 (1979) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD40-TXD8-60FB&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
—— (1979) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD40-TXD8-60FB&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
—— (1979) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD40-TXD8-60FB&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Estelle Derclaye, ‘Infopaq International A/S v Danske Dagblades Forening (C-5/08): Wonderful or Worrisome? The Impact of the ECJ Ruling in Infopaq on UK Copyright Law’ [2010] European Intellectual Property Review 247 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IB72704A030AC11DF9C83BB18AACF6BDB/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
European Court of Human Rights, *Von Hannover v Germany (59320/00) (2004) 40 EHRR 1 (2004) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE52AC120003611DBB3E7976425AFED86/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
——, *Von Hannover v Germany (59320/00) (2004) 40 EHRR 1 (2004) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE52AC120003611DBB3E7976425AFED86/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Express Newspapers Plc v News (UK) Ltd and Others - [1990] 3 All ER 376 (1990) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49F0-TWP1-6012&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
—— (1990) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49F0-TWP1-6012&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Fhima IS, ‘The Court of Justice’s Protection of the Advertising Function of Trade Marks: An (Almost) Sceptical Analysis’ (2011) 6 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 325
Fysh, Michael and others, The Modern Law of Patents (2nd ed, LexisNexis 2010)
Gangjee D and Burrell R, ‘Because You’re Worth It: L’Oreal and the Prohibition on Free Riding’ 73 Modern Law Review 282
Garnett, K. M. and others, Copinger and Skone James on Copyright, vol Intellectual property library (16th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2011)
Gavin Phillipson, ‘Transforming Breach of Confidence? Towards a Common Law Right of Privacy under the Human Rights Act’ (2003) 66 Modern Law Review 726 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=IAB06B7B0E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Gill Grassie, ‘Parallel Imports and Trade Marks - Where Are We? Part 1’ (2006) 28 European Intellectual Property Review 474 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=I8FFA6D10298311DB9C38979DE63AE30C&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
——, ‘Parallel Imports and Trade Marks: Part 2: The Repackaging Cases’ (2006) 28 European Intellectual Property Review 513 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=IB3C89E9042A811DBBF32AB60305756BD&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Google France SARL and Another v Louis Vuitton Malletier SA Google France SARL v Viaticum SA and Another Google France SARL v Centre National de Recherche En Relations Humaines (CNRRH) SARL and Others - [2010] All ER (D) 23 (Apr) (2010) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7Y4Y-47W0-Y96Y-H1TV&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
—— (2010) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7Y4Y-47W0-Y96Y-H1TV&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Helberger N and others, ‘Never Forever: Why Extending the Term of Protection for Sound Recordings Is a Bad Idea’ (2008) 30 European Intellectual Property Review 174 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=IBD3B9C10003511DDA46EB425E5C11227&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Helen Norman, ‘Time to Blow the Whistle on Trade Mark Use?’ [2004] Intellectual Property Quarterly 1 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I80E07370E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
——, ‘Time to Blow the Whistle on Trade Mark Use?’ [2004] Intellectual Property Quarterly 1 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I80E07370E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
‘Honestly, Neither Celine nor Gillette Is Defensible!’ (2008) 30 European Intellectual Property Review 286 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=I734626B0286811DD8EF9F64D79DCEEA7&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Ilanah Simon, ‘How Does “Essential Function” Doctrine Drive European Mark Trade Law?’ [2005] International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 401 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=I2F701380E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
——, ‘Nominative Use and Honest Practices in Industrial and Commercial Matters - a Very European History’ [2007] Intellectual Property Quarterly 117 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I7237CE70FF5311DB890AD2939FCE442A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Intellectual Property Office, ‘Trade Marks Act 1994’ <http://www.ipo.gov.uk/pro-types/pro-tm/t-law.htm>
——, ‘Trade Marks Act 1994’ <http://www.ipo.gov.uk/pro-types/pro-tm/t-law.htm>
——, ‘Trade Marks Act 1994’ <http://www.ipo.gov.uk/pro-types/pro-tm/t-law.htm>
Irini A. Stamatoudi, ‘“Joy” for the Claimant: Can a Film Also Be Protected as a Dramatic Work?’ [2000] Intellectual Property Quarterly 117 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I7FA49810E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Jacob, Robin, Alexander, Daniel, and Fisher, Matthew, Guidebook to Intellectual Property (6th ed, Hart 2013)
——, Guidebook to Intellectual Property (6th ed, Hart 2013)
Jennifer Davis, ‘Why the United Kingdom Should Have a Law against Misappropriation’ (2010) 69 Cambridge Law Journal 561 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE598DCA20CB111E0AFBDF1383E1E3727&amp;crumb-action=reset>
Jeremy Phillips, ‘Trade Mark Law and the Need to Keep Free’ (2005) 36 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 389 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=I2F74CE71E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Jochen Pagenberg., ‘Trade Dress and the Three Dimensional Mark - the Neglected Children of Trade Mark Law?’ (2004) 35 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 831 <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=I2F83C290E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Joshi R and Isaac B, ‘What Does Identical Mean?’ (2005) 27 European Intellectual Property Review 184 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=ICF4A94D0E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Keeling, David T., Intellectual Property Rights in EU Law: Vol. 1: Free Movement and Competition Law, vol Oxford EC law library (Oxford University Press 2003) <http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198259183.001.0001>
Kitchin, David, Kerly, Duncan Mackenzie, and Jacob, Robin, Kerly’s Law of Trade Marks and Trade Names, vol Intellectual property library (14th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2005)
Koninklijke Philips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd (Case C-299/99) - [2003] Ch 159 (2002) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T19962953981&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T19962953983&backKey=20_T19962953984&csi=296988&docNo=10&scrollToPosition=1710>
Laddie, Hugh, The Modern Law of Copyright and Designs (Butterworths 2000)
Laddie, Justice, ‘Copyright: Over-Strength, over-Regulated, over-Rated?’ (1996) 18 European Intellectual Property Review 253 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=ID04F5AA0E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Liakatou V and Maniatis S, ‘Lego - Building a European Concept of Functionality’ (2010) 32 European Intellectual Property Review 653 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=IB6FD09E1EED711DFB0EED922B45E4A88&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
*Libertel Groep BV v Benelux-Merkenbureau (Case C-104/01) - [2004] Ch 83 (2004) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T19962934462&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T19962934467&backKey=20_T19962934468&csi=296988&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=114>
—— (2004) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T19962934462&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T19962934467&backKey=20_T19962934468&csi=296988&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=114>
*Libertel v Benelux Merkenbureau (Case C-104/01) [2003] ECR I-3793 [2003] ETMR 63 (2003) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE0B97940E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&amp;crumb-action=reset>
M. Senftlebel, ‘Bringing EU Trademark Law Back Into Shape – Lessons to Learn from Keyword Advertising’ <http://www.epip.eu/conferences/epip06/papers/Parallel%20Session%20Papers/>
Merchandising Corporation of America v Harpbond [1983] FSR 32 (1983) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF91A2A70E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Merz & Krell (Case C-517/99) [2001] ECR I-6959 (2001) <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IF9600D10E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&crumb-action=reset>
‘Module Outline & Reading for TERM 1’
Morcom, Christopher, The Modern Law of Trade Marks (2nd ed, LexisNexis Butterworths 2005)
Mothercare v Penguin Books [1988] R.P.C. 113 (1988) <http://rpc.oxfordjournals.org/content/105/6/113.short?rss=1&ssource=mfr>
N.A. Moreham, ‘Privacy in the Common Law: A Doctrinal and Theoretical Analysis’ (2005) 121 Law Quarterly Review 628 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=ICC8D72D0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
*Newspaper Licensing Agency Ltd v Meltwater Holding BV [2012] RPC 1 (2012) <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE9F6C360B8A611E08E89E51884D3FC3D&crumb-action=reset>
—— (2012) <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?docguid=IE9F6C360B8A611E08E89E51884D3FC3D&crumb-action=reset>
Nigel P. Gravells, ‘Authorship and Originality: The Persistent Influence of Walter v Lane’ (2007) 3 Intellectual Property Quarterly 267 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=I9439A050407811DCBD0B8974948FEEE1&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Patricia Loughlan, ‘Descriptive Trade Marks, Fair Use and Consumer Confusion’ (2005) 27 European Intellectual Property Review 443 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=ICF386C60E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Phillips J, ‘Strong Trade Marks and the Likelihood of Confusion in European Law’ 1 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 385
Phillips, Jeremy, Trade Mark Law: A Practical Anatomy (Oxford University Press 2003)
——, Trade Mark Law: A Practical Anatomy (Oxford University Press 2003)
Pila J, ‘Copyright and Its Categories of Original Works’ 30 Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 229
Queen’s Bench Division, *Spelman v Express Newspapers [2012] EWHC 355 (2012) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=I0CBAF4D06D9111E1945FEE25069F94B3&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Rachael Mulheron, ‘A Potential Framework for Privacy? A Reply to Hello!’ (2006) 69 Modern Law Review 679 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I2211DAB03F8411DBBD6EEC2A69B1B2FF/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Rebecca Baines, ‘Copyright in Commissioned Works: A Cause for Uncertainty’ (2005) 27 European Intellectual Property Review 122 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=ICF37D020E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Richard Arnold, ‘Joy: A Reply’ [2001] Intellectual Property Quarterly 10 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/I7FA50D40E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
——, ‘Copyright in Photographs: A Case for Reform’ (2005) 27 European Intellectual Property Review 303 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=ICF37F730E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
——, ‘Confidence in Exclusives: Douglas v Hello! In the House of Lords’ (2007) 29 European Intellectual Property Review 339 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=I5257ADB12B5311DCA0A5F0FD76367280&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Ricketson S, ‘Reaping without Sowing: Unfair Competition and Intellectual Property Rights in Anglo-Australian Law’ (1984) 7 University of New South Wales Law Journal <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fswales&collection=journals>
Roughton A, ‘Permitted Infringing Use: The Scope of Defences to an Infringement Action’, Trade mark use (Oxford University Press 2005)
Schechter F, ‘The Rational Basis of Trade Mark Protection’ (1927) 40 Harvard Law Review <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fhlr&collection=journals>
Silver I and Lee P, ‘Protecting Your Rights – Copyright in Computer Games: Nova Productions and Mazooma Games Ltd’ (2007) 29 European Intellectual Property Review 251
Spence M, ‘Justifying Copyright’, Dear images: art, copyright and culture (Ridinghouse:, ICA 2002)
Spence, Michael, Intellectual Property, vol Clarendon law series (Oxford University Press 2007)
——, Intellectual Property, vol Clarendon law series (Oxford University Press 2007)
Stothers, Christopher, Parallel Trade in Europe: Intellectual Property, Competition and Regulatory Law (Hart 2007)
Tania S.L. Cheng, ‘Does Copyright Law Confer a Monopoly over Unpreserved Cows?’ [2006] European Intellectual Property Review 276 <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=ICF290310E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Tanya Aplin, ‘The Development of the Action for Breach of Confidence in a Post-HRA Era’ (2007) 19 Intellectual Property Quarterly <http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&amp;docguid=I22D01BE0A82211DB895EE0FA6D085F91&amp;entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth>
Terrell, Thomas and Thorley, Simon, Terrell on the Law of Patents (16th ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2006)
Torremans, Paul and Holyoak, Jon, Holyoak and Torremans Intellectual Property Law (7th ed, Oxford University Press 2013)
‘Trade Marks Directive 2008’ <http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=5206>
‘——’ <http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=5206>
University of London Press v University Tutorial Press [1916] 2 Ch 601 (1916) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE619B480E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
—— (1916) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE619B480E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
—— (1916) <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&amp;returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE619B480E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>
Wadlow, Christopher, The Law of Passing-off: Unfair Competition by Misrepresentation, vol Intellectual property library (3rd ed, Sweet & Maxwell 2004)
Waelde, Charlotte, Contemporary Intellectual Property: Law and Policy (3rd ed, Oxford University Press 2014)
Walter v Lane [1900] AC 539 (1900) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YK00-TWW4-2116&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
—— (1900) <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FXM-YK00-TWW4-2116&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>
Zemer L, ‘Contribution and Collaboration in Joint Authorship: Too Many Misconceptions’ 1 Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 283
AntiquesportfolioCom Plc v Rodney Fitch & Company Limited [2001] ECDR 5
*Arsenal Football Club plc v Reed [2003] ETMR 73 (CA)
Arsenal v Reed [2003] RPC 39
Axel Springer v Germany [2012] EMLR 15
Baigent & Leigh v Random House [2007] EWCA Civ 247, [2007] FSR 24
Beckingham v Hodgens [2003] ECDR 6 (Ch D); [2003] EMLR 18 (CA)
Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward [2008] EWCA Civ 83, [2008] ETMR 36
Brighton v Jones [2005] FSR 16
Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Pub Squash Co Pty Ltd [1981] 1 WLR 193 (PC)
Case 8/74 Procureur du Roi v Dassonville [1974] ECR 837 at 852, [1974] 2 CMLR 436
*Case 228/03 Gillette Company v LA-Laboratories Ltd Case [2005] ETMR 67
*Case 228/03 Gillette Company v LA-Laboratories Ltd Case [2005] ETMR 67
Case C-2/00 Hölterhoff v Ulrich Freiesleben [2002] ETMR 917
*Case C–16/03 Peak Holding v Axolin-Elinor [2004] ECR I–11313, [2005] Ch 261, [2005] 2 WLR 650
Case C-17/06 Céline v Céline SA [2007] ECR I-7041, [2007] ETMR 80
Case C-17/06 Céline v Céline SA [2007] ECR I-7041, [2007] ETMR 80
Case C-17/06 Céline v Céline SA [2007] ECR I-7041, [2007] ETMR 80
*Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1
*Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1
*Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1
*Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1
*Case C-39/97 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha v Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc [1998] ECR I-5507, [1999] ETMR 1
*Case C-40/01 Ansul BV and Ajax Brandbeveiliging BV (Minimax) [2003] ECR I-2439, [2003] ETMR 85
Case C-63/97 BMW v Deenik [1999] ECR I-905, [1999] 1 CMLR 1099
Case C-100/02 Gerolsteiner & Brunnen GmbH & Co v Putsch GmbH [2004] ETMR 40
Case C-100/02 Gerolsteiner & Brunnen GmbH & Co v Putsch GmbH [2004] ETMR 40
*Case C-143/00 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer I”) [2002] ECR I-3759, [2002] All ER (EC) 581
*Case C-145/10 Eva-Maria Painer v Standard Verlags GmbH, [2012] ECDR 6
*Case C-145/10 Eva-Maria Painer v Standard Verlags GmbH, [2012] ECDR 6
Case C-173/98 Sebago Inc and Ancienne Maison Dubois v GB Unic SA [1999] ETMR 681
*Case C-206/01 Arsenal Football Club plc v Reed, [2002] ECR I-10273, [2003] ETMR 19 (ECJ)
Case C-246/05 Armin Häupl v Lidl Stiftung & Co KG [2007] ETMR 61
*Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma [1997] ECR I-6191, [1998] ETMR 1
*Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma [1997] ECR I-6191, [1998] ETMR 1
*Case C-251/95 SABEL v Puma [1997] ECR I-6191, [1998] ETMR 1
Case C-259/02 La Mer Technology Inc v Laboratoires Goemar SA [2004] ETMR 47
*Case C-291/00 LTJ Diffusion v Sadas Vertbaudet, [2003] ECR I-2799, [2003] ETMR 83
*Case C-291/00 LTJ Diffusion v Sadas Vertbaudet, [2003] ECR I-2799, [2003] ETMR 83
*Case C-292/00 Davidoff & Cie SA, Zino Davidoff SA v Gofkid Ltd [2003] ECR I 389, [2002] ETMR 99
Case C-317/91 Deutsche Renault AG v Audi AG [1993] ECR I-6227, [1995] 1 CMLR 461
Case C-323/09 Interflora v Marks & Spencer plc [2012] ETMR 1
Case C-323/09 Interflora v Marks & Spencer plc [2012] ETMR 1
Case C-324/09 L’Oreal SA v eBay International AG [2011] ETMR 53
*Case C-337/95 Parfums Christian Dior SA v Evora BV [1997] ECR I-1603
*Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52
*Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52
*Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52
*Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52
*Case C-348/04 Boehringer Ingelheim v Swingward Ltd and Dowelhurst ("Boehringer II”), [2007] ECR I-3391, [2007] 2 CMLR 52
Case C-355/96 Silhouette International Schmied GmbH v Hartlauer Handelsgesellschaft mbH [1998] ECR I-4799, [1998] 2 CMLR 953
Case C-375/97 General Motors v Yplon [2000] RPC 572
Case C-379/97 Pharmacia & Upjohn SA v Paranova A/S ("Paranova II”)[1999] ECR I-6927, [2000] 1 CMLR 51
*Case C-408/01 Adidas-Salomon AG & Adidas Benelux BV v Fitnessworld Trading Ltd [2004] ETMR 10
*Case C-408/01 Adidas-Salomon AG & Adidas Benelux BV v Fitnessworld Trading Ltd [2004] ETMR 10
*Case C-414/99 Zino Davidoff SA v A&G Imports Ltd [2001] ECR I-8691, [2002] Ch 109, [2002] 1 CMLR 1
*Case C-414/99 Zino Davidoff SA v A&G Imports Ltd [2001] ECR I-8691, [2002] Ch 109, [2002] 1 CMLR 1
*Case C-427/93 Bristol-Myers Squibb v Paranova [1996] ECR I-3457, [1997] 1 CMLR 1151
*Case C-427/93 Bristol-Myers Squibb v Paranova [1996] ECR I-3457, [1997] 1 CMLR 1151
Case C-487/07 L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV [2009] ECR I-5185; [2010] RPC 1; [2009] ETMR 55 (ECJ)
Case C-487/07 L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV [2009] ECR I-5185; [2010] RPC 1; [2009] ETMR 55 (ECJ)
Case C-487/07 L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV [2009] ECR I-5185; [2010] RPC 1; [2009] ETMR 55 (ECJ)
*Case C-533/06 O2 Holdings Ltd v Hutchison 3G UK Ltd [2008] ETMR 55
Cases C-15 & 16/74 Centrafarm v Sterling Drug, Centrafarm v Winthrop [1974] ECR 1147, 1183, [1974] 2 CMLR 480
Colgate-Palmolive BV v Koninklijke Distilleerderijen Erven Lucas Bols NV (1976) 7 IIC 420 (CLAERYN/KLAREIN)
Creation Records v News Group Newspapers [1997] EMLR 444
De Maudsley v Palumbo [1996] FSR 447
Dennis Woodman v French Connection [2007] RPC 1
Diageo v Intercontinental Brands [2010] ETMR 57
Douglas v Hello! Ltd [2005] 4 All ER 128; [2005] 3 WLR 881
Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No1) QB 967, [2001] 2 WLR 992
Eden SARL v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) [2006] (T-305/04) ETMR 14
Exxon Corp v Exxon Insurance Consultants International Ltd [1982] Ch 119
*Faccenda Chicken Ltd v Fowler [1987] Ch 117
Fisher v Brooker [2007] EMLR 9; [2007] FSR 12 (Ch D); [2008] EMLR 13 (CA); [2009] 1 WLR 1764 (HL)
George Hensher Ltd v Restawile Upholstery (Lancs) Ltd [1976] AC 64
Glaxo Group Ltd v Dowelhurst Ltd (No 2) [2000] FSR 529
Griggs Group Ltd v Evans [2005] FSR 31
Hadley v Kemp [1999] EMLR 589
Harrods v Harrodian School [1996] RPC 697
Harrods v Harrodian School [1996] RPC 697
Hotel Cipriani Srl v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd [2010] RPC 16
Hotel Cipriani Srl v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd [2010] RPC 16
HRH Prince of Wales v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2008] Ch 57, [2007] 3 WLR 222
*Infopaq International v Danske Dagblades Forening (Case C-5/08)
*Interlego AG v Tyco Industries Inc [1989] AC 217
*Irvine v Talksport Ltd [2002] 1 WLR 2355
*Irvine v Talksport Ltd [2002] 1 WLR 2355
John Haig & Co Ltd v Forth Blending Co Ltd (1953) 70 RPC 259
Julius Sämann Ltd v Tetrosyl Ltd [2006] EWHC 529
Kaye v Robertson [1991] FSR 62
*Koninklijke Philips v Remington (Case C-299/99) [2002] ECR I-5475, [2002] ETMR 81
*Koninklijke Philips v Remington (Case C-299/99) [2002] ECR I-5475, [2002] ETMR 81
Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 273
Ladbroke (Football) Ltd v William Hill (Football) Ltd [1964] 1 WLR 273
*Lego Juris v OHIM (Case C-48/09 P) [2010] ETMR 63
L’Oréal SA v Bellure NV [2010] ETMR 47 (Court of Appeal)
*Lucasfilms v Ainsworth [2009] FSR 2
*Lucasfilms v Ainsworth [2009] FSR 2
Marca Mode CV v Adidas AG and Adidas Benelux (Case C-425/98 )
Mastercigars Direct Ltd v Hunters and Frankau [2007] ETMR 54
Metix (UK) Ltd v GH Maughan (Plastics) Ltd [1997] FSR 718
Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EMLR 20
*Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB), [2008] EMLR 20
Mosley v United Kingdom [2012] EMLR 1
Newspaper Licensing Agency v Marks & Spencer Plc [2001] Ch 257 (CA); [2003] 1 AC 551 (HL)
*Noah v Shuba [1991] FSR 14
*Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2) [1999] FSR 79, [2000] FSR 363 (CA)
*Norowzian v Arks Ltd (No 2) [1999] FSR 79, [2000] FSR 363 (CA)
Nova Productions Ltd v Mazooma Games Ltd [2006] RPC 14
Nova Productions Ltd v Mazooma Games Ltd [2006] RPC 14
Nova Productions Ltd v Mazooma Games Ltd [2007] RPC 25
Nova Productions Ltd v Mazooma Games Ltd [2007] RPC 25 (CA)
OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, HL
*OHIM v Wm Wrigley Junior Co (DOUBLEMINT) (Case C-191/01 P) [2004] RPC 327, [2004] 1 WLR 1728
*OHIM v Wm Wrigley Junior Co (DOUBLEMINT) (Case C-191/01 P) [2004] RPC 327, [2004] 1 WLR 1728
Philips Electronics NV v Remington Consumer Products Ltd (Case C-299/99) [2002] ECR I-5475, [2002] All ER (EC) 634, [2002] 2 CMLR 1329
Procter & Gamble Company v OHIM (BABY DRY) (Case C-383/99 P) [2001] ECR I-6251, [2002] Ch 82
Procter & Gamble v OHIM (Cases C-473/01 P and C-474/01 P) [2004] ETMR 89
*R v Johnstone [2004] ETMR 2
Re Basic Trademark SA’s Trade Mark Application [2005] RPC 25
Re Ghazilian’s Trade Mark Application [2002] RPC 33
*Reckitt & Colman v Borden [1990] RPC 341; [1990] 1 WLR 491
*Reckitt & Colman v Borden [1990] RPC 341; [1990] 1 WLR 491
Redd Solicitors LLP v Red Legal Ltd [2012] EWPCC 54, [2013] ETMR 13
*Reddaway v Banham [1896] AC 199
Reed Executive Plc v Reed Business Information Ltd [2004] ETMR 56
*Robin Ray v Classic FM [1998] FSR 622
RxWorks Ltd v Hunter [2007] EWHC 3061
S (A Child) (Identification: Restrictions on Publication) [2005] 1 AC 593
SAT1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v OHIM (Case C-329/02) (SAT2), [2005] 1 CMLR 1546
SAT1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v OHIM (Case C-329/02) (SAT2), [2005] 1 CMLR 1546
SAT1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v OHIM (Case C-329/02) (SAT2), [2005] 1 CMLR 1546
SAT1 SatellitenFernsehen GmbH v OHIM (Case C-329/02) (SAT2), [2005] 1 CMLR 1546
*Sawkins v Hyperion Records [2005] RPC 32; [2005] 1 WLR 3281
*Sawkins v Hyperion Records [2005] RPC 32; [2005] 1 WLR 3281
Shield Mark BV v Joost Kist HODN Memex (Case C-283/01) [2004] ETMR 33
*Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (C-273/00) [2002] ECR I-11737; [2003] ETMR 37
*Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (C-273/00) [2002] ECR I-11737; [2003] ETMR 37
*Sieckmann v Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (C-273/00) [2002] ECR I-11737; [2003] ETMR 37
Silberquelle GmbH v Maselli-Strickmode GmbH (C-495/07)
Taittinger SA v Allbev Ltd [1993] FSR 641
Taittinger SA v Allbev Ltd [1993] FSR 641
Taittinger SA v Allbev Ltd [1993] FSR 641
*Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas Ltd [2012] FSR 9
Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) [2012] EMLR 16
Wainwright v Home Office (AC 406)
Waterman (Pete) Ltd v CBS United Kingdom Ltd [1993] EMLR 27
Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions und Vertriebs GmbH v Boots und Segelzubehor Walter Huber (Cases C-108/97 and 109/97) [1999] ECR I-2779, [2000] 2 WLR 205
Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions und Vertriebs GmbH v Boots und Segelzubehor Walter Huber (Cases C-108/97 and 109/97) [1999] ECR I-2779, [2000] 2 WLR 205
*Windsurfing Chiemsee Produktions und Vertriebs GmbH v Boots und Segelzubehor Walter Huber (Cases C-108/97 and 109/97) [1999] ECR I-2779, [2000] 2 WLR 205
Woodward v Hutchins [1977] 2 All ER 751; [1977] 1 WLR 760
Zanella SNC’s Community Trade Mark Application (B42053) [2000] ETMR 69
ZYX Music GmbH v King [1995] 3 All ER 1, [1997] 2 All ER 129