[1]
A nation divided? The identities, politics and governance of England, openDemocracy UK blog: 16AD. https://www.opendemocracy.net/uk/john-denham/nation-divided-identities-politics-and-governance-of-england.
[2]
A not so awkward partner: the UK has been a champion of many causes in the EU, LSE Brexit blog: 15AD. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2016/04/15/a-not-so-awkward-partner-the-uk-has-been-a-champion-of-many-causes-in-the-eu/.
[3]
Adrian Vermeule The Atrophy of Constitutional Powers. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 32, 3, 421–444. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqs010.
[4]
Aileen Kavanagh 2015. ‘What’s so Weak About “Weak-Form Review”? The Case of the UK Human Rights Act 1998’. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2015). DOI:https://doi.org/https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/13/4/1008/2450828.
[5]
Ailsa Henderson et al. How Brexit was made in England. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 19, 4, 631–646. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117730542.
[6]
Anthony King 2007. John Bull’s Other Lands. The British Constitution. Oxford University Press. 179–214.
[7]
Anthony King 2007. The Judges Come Out. The British Constitution. Oxford University Press. 115–149.
[8]
Anthony King 2009. The Judges Come Out. The British constitution. Oxford University Press. 116–150.
[9]
Anthony King 2015. Who Governs Britain?. Pelican.
[10]
As devolution has progressed the centre has failed to imagine a new rationale for the union, UCL Constitution Unit Blog: 6AD. https://constitution-unit.com/2015/10/06/as-devolution-has-progressed-the-centre-has-failed-to-imagine-a-new-rationale-for-the-union/.
[11]
Atkins, J. Narrating One Nation: The Ideology and Rhetoric of the Miliband Labour Party. Politics. 35, 1, 19–31. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12076.
[12]
Atkins, J. (Re)imagining Magna Carta: Myth, Metaphor and the Rhetoric of Britishness. Parliamentary Affairs. 69, 3, 603–620. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv057.
[13]
Audickas, L. et al. 3AD. Membership of UK political parties - House of Commons Library report.
[14]
Audit 2017: How effective is the Westminster Parliament in scrutinising central government policy-making?’ : Democratic Audit UK: 31AD. http://www.democraticaudit.com/2017/08/31/audit-2017-how-effective-is-the-westminster-parliament-in-scrutinising-central-government-policy-making/.
[15]
Bale, T. et al. ‘Grassroots: Britain’s party members: who they are, what they think and what they do’ - Mile End Institute report. Mile End Institute: Queen Mary University of LOndon.
[16]
Barnett, S. and Seaton, J. Why the BBC Matters: Memo to the New Parliament about a Unique British Institution. The Political Quarterly. 81, 3, 327–332. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2010.02117.x.
[17]
BBC News: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news.
[18]
Ben Clements and Clive D. Field Public Opinion toward Homosexuality and Gay Rights in Great Britain. Public Opinion Quarterly. 78, 2, 523–547. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu018.
[19]
Ben Jackson 2015. Labour’s ideology: towards common ground. Renewal - A Journal of Social Democracy. 23, 4 (2015), 5–10.
[20]
Bennister, M. and Heffernan, R. Cameron as Prime Minister: The Intra-Executive Politics of Britain’s Coalition Government. Parliamentary Affairs. 65, 4, 778–801. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsr061.
[21]
Bernard Grofman 2004. Downs and Two-Party Convergence. Annual Review of Political Science. 7, (2004), 25–46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104711.
[22]
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. Prime Ministers, Presidentialism and Westminster Smokescreens. Political Studies. 54, 4, 671–690. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00632.x.
[23]
Bogdanor, Vernon 2009. The New British Constitution. Hart.
[24]
Brandenburg, H. and Johns, R. The Declining Representativeness of the British Party System, and Why It Matters. Political Studies. 62, 4, 704–725. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12050.
[25]
Breeze, R. '"Enemies of the people”: Populist performances in the Daily Mail reporting of the Article 50 case’. Discourse, Context & Media. 25, 60–67. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.03.008.
[26]
Brexit and our unprotected constitution - The Constitution Society: https://consoc.org.uk/publications/brexit-unprotected-british-constitution/.
[27]
Brexit and the territorial constitution: déjà vu all over again? UCL Constitution Unit Blog: 11AD. https://constitution-unit.com/2018/09/11/brexit-and-the-territorial-constitution-deja-vu-all-over-again/.
[28]
Brexit: the impact on government and parliament - seminar at the LSE: 23AD. http://www.lse.ac.uk/european-institute/events/2018-19/Impact-on-Government/Brexit-the-impact-on-government-and-parliament.
[29]
Buller, J. 1995. Britain as an Awkward Partner: Reassessing Britain’s Relations with the EU. Politics. 15, 1 (Feb. 1995), 33–42.
[30]
Byrne, C. and Theakston, K. Understanding the power of the prime minister: structure and agency in models of prime ministerial power’. British Politics. 1–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-018-0087-7.
[31]
Campaign for an English Parliament: http://thecep.org.uk/.
[32]
Catalano, A. Women Acting for Women?  An Analysis of Gender and Debate Participation in the British House of Commons, 2005–2007. Politics & Gender. 5, 1, 45–68.
[33]
Chadwick, A. et al. Do tabloids poison the well of social media? Explaining democratically dysfunctional news sharing’. New Media & Society. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769689.
[34]
Chaney, P. ‘Institutionally Homophobic? Political Parties and the Substantive Representation of LGBT People: Westminster and Regional UK Elections 1945–2011’. Policy & Politics. 41, 1, 101–121. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X645793.
[35]
Channel 4 News: http://www.channel4.com/news/.
[36]
Clarke, H. et al. ‘Valence Politics and Electoral Choice in Britain, 2010’. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 21, 2, 237–253. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2011.562614.
[37]
Clarke, H.D. et al. 2017. Symposium: James Tilley and Geoffrey Evans, The New Politics of Class. The Political Quarterly. 88, 4 (2017).
[38]
Clements, B. 2014. Partisan Attachments and Attitudes towards Same-Sex Marriage in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs. 67, 1 (Jan. 2014), 232–244. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gst003.
[39]
Colley, L. 8AD. Britishness in the 21st Century.
[40]
Colm O’Cinneide 2015. Human Rights and the UK Constitution. The Changing Constitution. Oxford University Press. 67–103.
[41]
Colm O’Cinneide 2012. Human rights and the UK constitution, British Academy. British Academy.
[42]
Constitution Unit: .
[43]
Constitution Unit Blog - Brexit theme: https://constitution-unit.com/category/europe/.
[44]
Cowley, P. and Ford, R. eds. 2014. Sex, Lies, and the Ballot Box: 50 Things You Need to Know about British Elections. Biteback Publishing.
[45]
Crisis, headache, or sideshow: how should the UK government respond to the Scottish parliament’s decision to withhold consent for the Withdrawal Bill? UCL Constitution Unit Blog: 30AD. https://constitution-unit.com/2018/05/30/crisis-headache-or-sideshow-how-should-the-uk-government-respond-to-the-scottish-parliaments-decision-to-withhold-consent-for-the-withdrawal-bill/.
[46]
Crouch, J. and Minhas, P. 2017. Multicultural Britain in the 21st Century - Opinium research.
[47]
Curtice, J. A Stronger or Weaker Union? Public Reactions to Asymmetric Devolution in the United Kingdom. Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 36, 1, 95–113. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjj006.
[48]
Curtice, J. ‘Why Leave Won the UK’s EU Referendum’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 55, 19–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12613.
[49]
Daily Express: http://www.express.co.uk/.
[50]
Daily Mail: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html.
[51]
Daily Mirror: http://www.mirror.co.uk/.
[52]
Daily Telegraph: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/.
[53]
David Olusoga 29AD. The reality of being black in today’s Britain’, Guardian. Guardian. (29AD).
[54]
David Sanders et al. The democratic engagement of Britain’s ethnic minorities. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 37, 1, 120–139. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.827795.
[55]
Deborah Mabbett Parliamentary Sovereignty and Brexit. The Political Quarterly. 88, 2, 167–169. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12364.
[56]
Democratic Audit UK blog: http://www.democraticaudit.com/.
[57]
Denver, D. ‘Valence Politics’: How Britain Votes Now’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 7, 2, 292–299. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00171.x.
[58]
Devine, F. 2009. Class. The Oxford Handbook of British Politics. Oxford University Press.
[59]
Divided but influential? The Exiting the European Union select committee. UCL Constitution Unit Blog: 10AD. https://constitution-unit.com/2018/05/10/divided-but-influential-the-exiting-the-european-union-select-committee/.
[60]
Do voters still want to leave the EU? How they view the Brexit process two years on - UK in a changing Europe report: 7AD. http://ukandeu.ac.uk/research-papers/do-voters-still-want-to-leave-the-eu-how-they-view-the-brexit-process-two-years-on/.
[61]
Dommett, K. Ideological Quietism? Ideology and Party Politics in Britain. Political Studies. n/a-n/a. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12160.
[62]
Dommett, K. and Temple, L. Digital Campaigning: The Rise of Facebook and Satellite Campaigns. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, suppl_1, 189–202. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx056.
[63]
Donald, A. et al. 2012. The UK and the European Court of Human Rights – Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report 83.
[64]
Dorey, P. and Denham, A. 2016. ‘The Longest Suicide Vote in History’: The Labour Party Leadership Election of 2015. British Politics. 11, 3 (2016), 259–282. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-016-0001-0.
[65]
Dorey, P. and Garnett, M. 2015. The weaker-willed, the craven-hearted : the decline of One Nation Conservatism. Global discourse. 5, 1 (2015), 69–91.
[66]
Dowding, K. ‘The Prime Ministerialisation of the British Prime Minister’. Parliamentary Affairs. 66, 3, 617–635. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss007.
[67]
Elizabeth Dubois and Grant Blank The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society. 21, 5, 729–745. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656.
[68]
Eurobarometer - European Commission: http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/General/index.
[69]
Evans, E. 2016. Diversity Matters: Intersectionality and Women’s Representation in the USA and UK. Parliamentary Affairs. 69, 3 (Jul. 2016), 569–585. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv063.
[70]
Evans, G. and Menon, A. 2017. Brexit and British politics. Polity Press.
[71]
Evans, G. and Tilley, J. 2017. The new politics of class: the political exclusion of the British working class. Oxford University Press.
[72]
Evans, J. and Tonge, J. 13AD. Partisan and religious drivers of moral conservatism: Same-sex marriage and abortion in Northern Ireland. Party Politics. 24, 4 (13AD), 335–346. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816656665.
[73]
Ewing, K.D. The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy. Modern Law Review. 62, 1, 79–99. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00192.
[74]
Ewing, K.D. and Tham, J.-C. 2008. The Continuing Futility of the Human Rights Act. Public Law. (2008), 668–693.
[75]
Financial Times: http://www.ft.com/home/uk.
[76]
Foley, M. 2000. The British Presidency: Tony Blair and the Politics of Public Leadership. Manchester University Press.
[77]
Ford, R. Is Racial Prejudice Declining in Britain? The British Journal of Sociology. 59, 4, 609–636. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00212.x.
[78]
Ford, R. and Goodwin, M. 2017. Britain After Brexit A Nation Divided. Journal of Democracy. 28, 1 (2017), 17–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0002.
[79]
Garnett, M. and Lynch, P. 2016. Exploring British politics. Routledge.
[80]
Goodwin, M. and Milazzo, C. Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 19, 3, 450–464. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117710799.
[81]
Green, J. and Hobolt, S.B. Owning the Issue Agenda: Party Strategies and Vote Choices in British Elections. Electoral Studies. 27, 3, 460–476. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.02.003.
[82]
Harmer, E. and Southern, R. More Stable than Strong: Women’s Representation, Voters and Issues. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, suppl_1, 237–254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx072.
[83]
Harold D. Clarke et al. Why Britain Voted for Brexit: An Individual-Level Analysis of the 2016 Referendum Vote. Parliamentary Affairs. 70, 3, 439–464. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx005.
[84]
Harold D. Clarke, et al 2004. Valence Politics. Political choice in Britain. Oxford University Press. 1–16.
[85]
Hayton, R. and McEnhill, L. Cameron’s Conservative Party, social liberalism and social justice. British Politics. 10, 2, 131–147. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.19.
[86]
Hazell, R. 2006. The English Question. Manchester University Press.
[87]
Hazell, R. and Sandford, M. English Question or Union Question? Neither Has Easy Answers. The Political Quarterly. 86, 1, 16–23. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12132.
[88]
Heath, A.F. et al. Ethnic Heterogeneity in the Social Bases of Voting at the 2010 British General Election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 21, 2, 255–277. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2011.562611.
[89]
Heffernan, R. et al. eds. 2016. Developments in British Politics 10. Palgrave.
[90]
Heffernan, R. ‘Labour’s New Labour Legacy: Politics after Blair and Brown’. Political Studies Review. 9, 2, 163–177. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00230.x.
[91]
Heffernan, R. Prime Ministerial Predominance? Core Executive Politics in the UK. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 5, 3, 347–372. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00110.
[92]
Heffernan, R. and Webb, P. 2005. The British Prime Minister: Much More Than ‘First Among Equals’. The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford University Press. 26–62.
[93]
Higgins, M. and McKay, F.M. 2015. Gender and the Development of a Political Persona: The Case of Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon. British Politics. (2015), 283–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.44.
[94]
Hirsch, A. 2018. Brit(ish): on race, identity and belonging. Jonathan Cape.
[95]
Hobolt, S.B. Brexit and the 2017 UK General Election. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 56, 39–50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12751.
[96]
How Government Works – gov.uk: https://www.gov.uk/government/how-government-works.
[97]
How the United Kingdom voted on Thursday... and why - Lord Ashcroft Polls: 24AD. https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why/#more-14746.
[98]
How well does the UK’s media system support democratic politics and represent citizens’ interests? - Democratic Audit UK: 30AD. http://www.democraticaudit.com/2018/08/30/2018audit-how-well-does-the-uks-media-system-support-democratic-politics-and-represent-citizens-interests/.
[99]
Intergovernmental relations and the English question: options for reform. Constitution Unit Blog: 16AD. https://constitution-unit.com/2018/08/16/intergovernmental-relations-and-the-english-question-options-for-reform/.
[100]
‘It’s NOT the economy, stupid: Brexit as a story of personal values’, LSE British Politics and Policy blog: 7AD. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/personal-values-brexit-vote/.
[101]
Ivor Crewe and Donald D. Searing Ideological Change in the British Conservative Party. The American Political Science Review. 82, 2. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1957391.
[102]
Jackson, D. et al. eds. EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. CSJCC (Bournemouth University), CRCC (Loughborough University), and Political Studies Association.
[103]
Jeremy Corbyn pledges socialism for 21st century as he plans business tax hike and benefits free-for-all.: 28AD. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/28/jeremy-corbyn-immigration-labour-conference-speech-live/.
[104]
Jessop, B. Margaret Thatcher and Thatcherism: Dead but not buried. British Politics. 10, S1, 16–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2014.22.
[105]
Joe Owen et al. 17AD. Brexit: six months to go - Institute for Government report. (17AD).
[106]
John Curtice 2016. Euroscepticism. British Social Attitudes 33. NatCen Social Research. 1–19.
[107]
John Curtice and Sarah Tipping 2018. A more informed public? The impact of the Brexit debate. British Social Attitudes. NatCen Social Research. 1–33.
[108]
John Curtice and Sarah Tipping 2018. A more informed public? The impact of the Brexit debate. British Social Attitudes. NatCen Social Research. 1–33.
[109]
Jonathan Mellon et al. Brexit or Corbyn? Campaign and Inter-Election Vote Switching in the 2017 UK General Election. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, 4, 719–737. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsy001.
[110]
Jones, B. and Norton, P. 2014. Politics UK. Routledge.
[111]
Joni Lovenduski Prime Minister’s questions as political ritual. British Politics. 7, 4, 314–340. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2012.13.
[112]
Julianne Kerr Morrison et al. 10AD. Data and Democracy in the Digital Age, The Constitution Society.
[113]
Kalitowski, S. Rubber Stamp or Cockpit? The Impact of Parliament on Government Legislation. Parliamentary Affairs. 61, 4, 694–708. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn030.
[114]
Katz, R.S. No man can serve two masters. Party Politics. 20, 2, 183–193. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813519967.
[115]
Kavanagh, D. Power in British political parties: Iron law or special pleading? West European Politics. 8, 3, 5–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402388508424538.
[116]
K.D. Ewing 2013. The Resilience of the Political Constitution. German Law Journal. 14, (2013), 2111–2136.
[117]
Keith Ewing Brexit and Parliamentary Sovereignty. The Modern Law Review. 80, 4, 711–726. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12281.
[118]
Ken Newton Public Service and Commercial Broadcasting: Impacts on Politics and Society. The Political Quarterly. 87, 1, 31–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12214.
[119]
Kenny, M. et al. Roundtable on English Nationalism and Euroscepticism, British Politics, September 2015. British Politics. 10, 3.
[120]
King, A. 2009. The British constitution. Oxford University Press.
[121]
King, A.S. 2009. The British constitution. Oxford University Press.
[122]
Kingdom, J. and Fairclough, P. 2014. Government and Politics in Britain. Polity.
[123]
Krishan Kumar 2000. Nation and Empire: English and British National Identity in Comparative Perspective. Theory and Society. 29, 5 (2000), 575–608.
[124]
Krook, M.L. and Nugent, M.K. Intersectional institutions: Representing women and ethnic minorities in the British Labour Party. Party Politics. 22, 5, 620–630. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816655564.
[125]
Labour Party: http://www.labour.org.uk/.
[126]
Leach, R. et al. 2011. British Politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[127]
Lees-Marshment, J. The Marriage of Politics and Marketing. Political Studies. 49, 4, 692–713. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00337.
[128]
Lehrer, R. Intra-Party Democracy and Party Responsiveness. West European Politics. 35, 6, 1295–1319. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.713747.
[129]
Lijphart, A. 2012. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Yale University Press.
[130]
Lord Ashcroft You Should Hear What They Say about You, Lord Ashcroft polling report.
[131]
Lorenza Antonucci et al. The malaise of the squeezed middle: Challenging the narrative of the ‘left behind’ Brexiter. Competition & Change. 21, 3, 211–229. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529417704135.
[132]
Lori Thorlakson 2011. Britain’s Place in the European Union. Developments in British Politics. Palgrave Macmillan. 257–279.
[133]
LSE British Politics and Policy blog: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/.
[134]
MacKay, F. 2009. Gender. The Oxford Handbook of British Politics. Oxford University Press. 646–662.
[135]
Magne Flemmen, Mike Savage 2017. The politics of nationalism and white racism in the UK. The British Journal of Sociology. 68, S1 (2017), S233–S264.
[136]
Mandatory reselection: lessons from Labour’s past: 8AD. https://constitution-unit.com/2018/11/08/mandatory-reselection-lessons-from-labours-past/.
[137]
Mark Bevir The Westminster Model, Governance and Judicial Reform. Parliamentary Affairs. 61, 4, 559–577. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn025.
[138]
Mark Elliott 2004. United Kingdom: Parliamentary Sovereignty under Pressure. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2, 1 (2004), 545–555.
[139]
Martin Smith and Rhonda Jones From big society to small state: Conservatism and the privatisation of government. British Politics. 10, 2, 226–248. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.23.
[140]
Masterman, R. ‘Labour’s “Juridification” of the Constitution’. Parliamentary Affairs. 62, 3, 476–492. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsp013.
[141]
Matthew Bevington et al. 29AD. The Brexit Endgame: A Short Guide - UK in a Changing Europe report. Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law.
[142]
Matthews, F. Majoritarianism Reinterpreted: Effective Representation and the Quality of Westminster Democracy. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, 1, 50–72. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx011.
[143]
Meer, N. The Politics of Voluntary and Involuntary Identities: Are Muslims in Britain an Ethnic, Racial or Religious Minority? Patterns of Prejudice. 42, 1, 61–81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220701805901.
[144]
Meer, N. and Modood, T. The Multicultural State We’re In: Muslims, ‘Multiculture’ and the ‘Civic Re-balancing’ of British Multiculturalism. Political Studies. 57, 3, 473–497. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00745.x.
[145]
Meg Russell et al. Fitting the Bill: Bringing Commons Legislation Committees into Line with Best Practice. UCL Constitution Unit report.
[146]
Meg Russell and Jack Sheldon 2018. Options for an English Parliament - UCL Constitution Unit report.
[147]
Men Writing about Men: Media and the UK General Election 2015: 22AD. https://blog.lboro.ac.uk/crcc/general-election/men-writing-about-men-media-and-the-uk-general-election-2015/.
[148]
Michael Blauberger et al. ECJ Judges Read the Morning Papers. Explaining the Turnaround of European Citizenship Jurisprudence’. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3123003.
[149]
Michael Blauberger and Susanne K. Schmidt The European Court of Justice and its political impact. West European Politics. 40, 4, 907–918. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1281652.
[150]
Michael Freeden The Ideology of New Labour. The Political Quarterly. 70, 1, 42–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.00203.
[151]
Monitor 64: Brexit and the transformation of British politics. UCL Constitution Unit Blog: 24AD. https://constitution-unit.com/2016/10/24/monitor-64-brexit-and-the-transformation-of-british-politics/.
[152]
Moran, M. 2015. Politics and Governance in the UK. Palgrave Macmillan.
[153]
Neil Johnston 11AD. Prisoners’ voting rights: developments since May 2015 - House of Commons Library briefing paper CBP-7461.
[154]
Neil Lee et al. Immobility and the Brexit vote. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 11, 1, 143–163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx027.
[155]
Newton, K. May the Weak Force Be with You: The Power of the Mass Media in Modern Politics. European Journal of Political Research. 45, 2, 209–234. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00296.x.
[156]
Nicholas Startin Have we reached a tipping point? The mainstreaming of Euroscepticism in the UK. International Political Science Review. 36, 3, 311–323. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115574126.
[157]
Nicola McEwen Still better together? Purpose and power in intergovernmental councils in the UK. Regional & Federal Studies. 27, 5, 667–690. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1389724.
[158]
Norris, P. 1995. May’s Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited. Party Politics. 1, 1 (1995), 29–47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001002.
[159]
Oliver Daddow The UK media and ‘Europe’: from permissive consensus to destructive dissent. International Affairs. 88, 6, 1219–1236. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01129.x.
[160]
Olusoga, D. 2016. Black and British: a forgotten history. Macmillan.
[161]
One year of EVEL: evaluating ‘English votes for English laws’ in the House of Commons - The UCL Constitution Unit Blog: 28AD. https://constitution-unit.com/2016/11/28/one-year-of-evel-evaluating-english-votes-for-english-laws-in-the-house-of-commons/.
[162]
Open Democracy UK: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/.
[163]
Owen, J. et al. 10AD. Preparing Brexit: How ready is Whitehall? - Institute for Government report. (10AD).
[164]
Palgrave Macmillan - Politics and Governance in the UK - Michael Moran: https://www.macmillanihe.com/companion/Moran-Politics-And-Governance-In-The-Uk-3e/.
[165]
Parveen Akhtar and Timothy Peace Ethnic minorities in British politics: candidate selection and clan politics in the Labour Party. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 1–17. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1443804.
[166]
Paul Baker et al. Sketching Muslims: A Corpus Driven Analysis of Representations Around the Word ‘Muslim’ in the British Press 1998–2009. Applied Linguistics. 34, 3, 255–278. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams048.
[167]
Peter Dorey and Andrew Denham The Longest Suicide Vote in History: The Labour Party Leadership Election of 2015. British Politics. Volume 11, 3, 259–282. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-016-0001-0.
[168]
Peter Kerr et al. Theorising Cameronism. Political Studies Review. 9, 2, 193–207. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00232.x.
[169]
Pettitt, R.T. The ‘how’ of election manifestos in the British Labour Party’. Party Politics. 24, 3, 289–295. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816678889.
[170]
Politico UK: https://www.politico.eu/country/united-kingdom/.
[171]
politics.co.uk: http://www.politics.co.uk/.
[172]
Prime Minister’s Office, 10 Downing Street – gov.uk: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street.
[173]
'Prisoners’ Voting Rights: Case Closed?’, UK Constitutional Law Association blog: 30AD. https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/01/30/elizabeth-adams-prisoners-voting-rights-case-closed/.
[174]
Rabinowitz, G. and Macdonald, S.E. A Directional Theory of Issue Voting. The American Political Science Review. 83, 1. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1956436.
[175]
Richard Ashcroft and Mark Bevir Pluralism, National Identity and Citizenship: Britain after Brexit. The Political Quarterly. 87, 3, 355–359. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12293.
[176]
Richard Hayton 2016. Constructing a New Conservatism: Ideology and Values. David Cameron and Conservative renewal : the limits of modernisation?. G. Peele and J. Francis, eds. Manchester University Press. 41–57.
[177]
Richard Heffernan Exploring (and Explaining) the British Prime Minister. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 7, 4, 605–620. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00203.x.
[178]
Richard Heffernan and Paul Webb 2005. The British Prime Minister: Much More Than ‘First Among Equals. The presidentialization of politics: a comparative study of modern democracies. Oxford University Press. 26–62.
[179]
Richard Kelly 20AD. English votes for English laws - House of Commons Library briefing. (20AD).
[180]
Ringen, S. 2003. Why the British Press Is Brilliant. British Journalism Review. 14, 3 (Sep. 2003), 31–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/09564748030143007.
[181]
Ross, K. et al. The Gender of News and News of Gender: A Study of Sex, Politics, and Press Coverage of the 2010 British General Election. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 18, 1, 3–20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212457814.
[182]
Russell, M. A Stronger Second Chamber? Assessing the Impact of House of Lords Reform in 1999 and the Lessons for Bicameralism. Political Studies. 58, 5, 866–885. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00810.x.
[183]
Russell, M. et al. Actors, Motivations and Outcomes in the Legislative Process: Policy Influence at Westminster. Government and Opposition. 52, 01, 1–27. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2015.25.
[184]
Russell, M. ''Never Allow a Crisis Go To Waste: The Wright Committee Reforms to Strengthen the House of Commons". Parliamentary Affairs. 64, 4, 612–633. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsr026.
[185]
Russell, M. and Cowley, P. Modes of UK Executive-Legislative Relations Revisited. The Political Quarterly. 89, 1, 18–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12463.
[186]
Russell, M. and Cowley, P. ‘The Policy Power of the Westminster Parliament: The “Parliamentary State” and the Empirical Evidence’. Governance. 121–137. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12149.
[187]
Russian Involvement and Junk News during Brexit – Oxford Internet Institute: 2017. https://blogs.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/93/2017/12/Russia-and-Brexit-v27.pdf.
[188]
Saalfeld, T. and Bischof, D.B. Minority-Ethnic MPs and the Substantive Representation of Minority Interests in the House of Commons, 2005-2011. Parliamentary Affairs. 66, 2, 305–328. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss084.
[189]
Sara B. Hobolt The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent’. Journal of European Public Policy. 23, 9, 1259–1277. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785.
[190]
Sascha O Becker et al. Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis. Economic Policy. 32, 92, 601–650. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eix012.
[191]
Seyd, P. and Whiteley, P. 2004. British Party Members: An Overview. Party Politics. 10, 4 (2004), 355–366. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068804043903.
[192]
Shulman, S. Challenging the Civic/Ethnic and West/East Dichotomies in the Study of Nationalism. Comparative Political Studies. 35, 5, 554–585. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035005003.
[193]
Simon Bulmer and Martin Burch The Europeanization of UK Government: from Quiet Revolution to Explicit Step-Change? Public Administration. 83, 4, 861–890. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00481.x.
[194]
Sky News: http://news.sky.com/.
[195]
Smith, J.C. Politics and Parenthood: An Examination of UK Party Leadership Elections. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, 1, 196–217. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx016.
[196]
SNP (Scottish National Party): http://www.snp.org/.
[197]
Sobolewska, M. Party Strategies and the Descriptive Representation of Ethnic Minorities: The 2010 British General Election. West European Politics. 36, 3, 615–633. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.773729.
[198]
Social Media and News Sources during the 2017 UK General Election – Oxford Internet Institute: 6AD. http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/social-media-and-news-sources-during-the-2017-uk-general-election/.
[199]
Squires, J. Intersecting Inequalities: Britain’s Equality Review. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 11, 4, 496–512. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740903237459.
[200]
Stephen Gardbaum What’s so weak about "weak-form review”? A reply to Aileen Kavanagh. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 13, 4, 1040–1048. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov063.
[201]
Stephen George A Reply to Buller. Politics. 15, 1, 43–47.
[202]
Stephen Ward and Dominic Wring Out with the Old, In with the New? The Media Campaign. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, suppl_1, 203–221. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx057.
[203]
Stephen Ward and Dominic Wring Out with the Old, In with the New? The Media Campaign. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, suppl_1, 203–221. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx057.
[204]
Steve Buckler and David Dolowitz 2012. Ideology Matters: Party Competition, Ideological Positioning and the Case of the Conservative Party under David Cameron. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 14, 4 (2012), 576–594. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00482.x.
[205]
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Waite, E. Toward a More Pragmatic Multiculturalism? How the U.K. Policy Community Sees the Future of Ethnic Diversity Policies. Governance. 27, 2, 267–289. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12030.
[206]
The Conservative Party: .
[207]
The Constitution Unit Blog: http://constitution-unit.com/.
[208]
The executive’s Brexit: the UK Constitution after Miller. UCL Constitution Unit Blog: 21AD. https://constitution-unit.com/2018/08/21/the-executives-brexit-the-uk-constitution-after-miller/#more-6958.
[209]
The Guardian: http://www.theguardian.com/uk.
[210]
The Huffington Post UK: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/.
[211]
The Labour party, Momentum and the problem with intra-party democracy: Democratic Audit UK: 31AD. http://www.democraticaudit.com/2016/10/31/the-labour-party-momentum-and-the-problem-with-intra-party-democracy/.
[212]
The Liberal Democrats: .
[213]
The Mechanics of a Further Referendum on Brexit. UCL Constitution Unit report: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/research/electionsandreferendums/The_Mechanics_of_a_Further_Referendum_on_Brexit.
[214]
The process of Brexit: what comes next? UCL Constitution Unit Blog: 8AD. https://constitution-unit.com/2017/02/08/the-process-of-brexit-what-comes-next/.
[215]
The Smith Commission: 2014. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20151202171017/http://www.smith-commission.scot/.
[216]
The Sun: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/.
[217]
The Times: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/.
[218]
Theresa May promises bright future for all in conference speech - Daily Express: 6AD. http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/718107/Theresa-May-promises-bright-future-for-all.
[219]
Theresa May’s Conference Speech Gave a Monstrous Ideology a Human Face, Vice UK: 5AD. http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/theresa-may-conference-speech-2016.
[220]
Theresa May’s speech shows that free-market ideas are in decline - Daily Telegraph: 5AD. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/10/05/no-prime-minister-the-government-doesnt-always-know-whats-best/.
[221]
Thompson, L. Debunking the Myths of Bill Committees in the British House of Commons. Politics. 36, 1, 36–48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12094.
[222]
Thompson, L. More of the Same or a Period of Change? The Impact of Bill Committees in the Twenty-First Century House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs. 66, 3, 459–479. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss016.
[223]
Thrasher, M. et al. Candidate Ethnic Origins and Voter Preferences: Examining Name Discrimination in Local Elections in Britain. British Journal of Political Science. 47, 02, 413–435. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000125.
[224]
Tim Bale 2016. The Conservative Party: From Thatcher to Cameron. Polity.
[225]
Timothy Heppell Cameron and Liberal Conservatism: Attitudes within the Parliamentary Conservative Party and Conservative Ministers. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 15, 3, 340–361. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00546.x.
[226]
Tony Blair and others Tony Blair’s Reuters Speech on the Media and responses. Political Quarterly. Volume 78, 4, 471–498.
[227]
Torrance, D. 24AD. Intergovernmental relations in the United Kingdom, House of Commons Library briefing.
[228]
Trench, A. Devolution in the Round: Can Britain Continue to Muddle through? Political Insight. 5, 3, 4–7. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-9066.12066.
[229]
UK Constitutional Law Association blog: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/.
[230]
UK Election Analysis 2017: Media, Voters and the Campaign: http://www.electionanalysis.uk/.
[231]
UK Parliament – Homepage: .
[232]
UK Parliament – Research Briefings: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/.
[233]
UK Polling Report: .
[234]
UKIP (the United Kingdom Independence Party): http://www.ukip.org/.
[235]
Vaughne Miller 13AD. How much legislation comes from Europe? – House of Commons Library Research Briefing.
[236]
Vernon Bogdanor Europe and the Sovereignty of the People. The Political Quarterly. 87, 3, 348–351. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12297.
[237]
Vincent, A. New Ideologies for Old? The Political Quarterly. 69, 1, 48–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.00136.
[238]
Virdee, S. and McGeever, B. Racism, Crisis, Brexit. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 41, 10, 1802–1819. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1361544.
[239]
Vivien A. Schmidt Procedural democracy in the EU: the Europeanization of national and sectoral policy-making processes’. Journal of European Public Policy. 13, 5, 670–691. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600808444.
[240]
Ward, O. Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 22, 1, 43–66. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216673195.
[241]
‘Westminster versus Whitehall: Two Incompatible Views of the Constitution’, UK Constitutional Law Association blog: 10AD. https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/04/10/david-howarth-westminster-versus-whitehall-two-incompatible-views-of-the-constitution/.
[242]
What did Corbyn say in his Conference speech? - Prospect Magazine: 28AD. http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/what-did-corbyn-say-in-his-conference-speech.
[243]
What does Jeremy Corbyn think? - The Guardian: 12AD. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/12/what-does-jeremy-corbyn-think.
[244]
What is Britishness? Citizenship, Values and Identity, Red Pepper: 2008. http://www.redpepper.org.uk/what-is-britishness-citizenship/.
[245]
Wilks, S. Britain and Europe: An Awkward Partner or an Awkward State? Politics. 16, 3, 159–165.
[246]
Young, Alison L. 2017. The Constitutional Implications of Brexit. European Public Law. 23, 4 (2017), 757–786.
[247]
British Politics.
[248]
Course Overview.
[249]
2012. HMG, Review of the Balance of Competences. Foreign & Commonwealth Office.
[250]
14AD. House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, ‘Disinformation and “Fake News”: Final Report’, Eighth Report of Session 2017-19.
[251]
28AD. House of Commons Exiting the EU Committee, ‘Parliamentary Scrutiny and Approval of the Withdrawal Agreement and Negotiations on a Future Relationship’, Sixth Report of Session 2017-19.
[252]
31AD. House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Devolution and Exiting the EU: Reconciling Differences and Building Strong Relationships, Eighth Report of Session 2017-19.
[253]
31AD. House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Devolution and Exiting the EU: Reconciling Differences and Building Strong Relationships, Eighth Report of Session 2017-19.
[254]
Intimidation in Public Life: A Review by the Committee on Standards in Public Life.
[255]
Jeremy Corbyn’s speech to the Labour Party conference, 28 September 2016.
[256]
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties.
[257]
Ministry of Justice, ‘Responding to Human Rights judgments: Report to the Joint Committee on Human Rights on the Government’s response to Human Rights judgments 2017–18’, November 2018.
[258]
Parliamentary Affairs.
[259]
Political Insight.
[260]
The Political Quarterly.
[261]
The Political Quarterly. 86, 2.
[262]
The Political Quarterly : Vol 78 , No 4. The Political Quarterly. 78, 4.
[263]
Theresa May’s speech to the Conservative Party Conference, 5 October 2016.
[264]
2017. World Economic Forum, Global Gender Gap Report 2017. World Economic Forum.