2.
Garnett, M., Lynch, P.: Exploring British politics. Routledge, London (2016).
3.
Jones, B., Norton, P.: Politics UK. Routledge, London (2014).
4.
Leach, R., Coxall, B., Robins, L.: British Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011).
5.
Kingdom, J., Fairclough, P.: Government and Politics in Britain. Polity, Cambridge (2014).
6.
Moran, M.: Politics and Governance in the UK. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2015).
7.
Bogdanor, Vernon: The New British Constitution. Hart, Oxford (2009).
8.
Anthony King: Who Governs Britain? Pelican (2015).
9.
King, A.S.: The British constitution. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
10.
Heffernan, R., Hay, C., Russell, M., Cowley, P. eds: Developments in British Politics 10. Palgrave, London (2016).
11.
Cowley, P., Ford, R. eds: Sex, Lies, and the Ballot Box: 50 Things You Need to Know about British Elections. Biteback Publishing, London (2014).
12.
Evans, G., Menon, A.: Brexit and British politics. Polity Press, Cambridge (2017).
13.
The Political Quarterly.
14.
Parliamentary Affairs.
16.
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties.
18.
UK Parliament – Homepage.
19.
UK Parliament – Research Briefings, http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/.
20.
How Government Works – gov.uk, https://www.gov.uk/government/how-government-works.
21.
Prime Minister’s Office, 10 Downing Street – gov.uk, https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street.
22.
Palgrave Macmillan - Politics and Governance in the UK - Michael Moran, https://www.macmillanihe.com/companion/Moran-Politics-And-Governance-In-The-Uk-3e/.
24.
The Constitution Unit Blog, http://constitution-unit.com/.
25.
LSE British Politics and Policy blog, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/.
26.
UK Constitutional Law Association blog, https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/.
27.
Democratic Audit UK blog, http://www.democraticaudit.com/.
28.
Open Democracy UK, https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/.
29.
BBC News, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news.
30.
Sky News, http://news.sky.com/.
31.
Channel 4 News, http://www.channel4.com/news/.
32.
The Guardian, http://www.theguardian.com/uk.
33.
The Times, http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/.
34.
Daily Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/.
35.
Financial Times, http://www.ft.com/home/uk.
36.
Daily Mail, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html.
37.
Daily Express, http://www.express.co.uk/.
38.
The Sun, http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/.
39.
Daily Mirror, http://www.mirror.co.uk/.
40.
The Huffington Post UK, http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/.
41.
politics.co.uk, http://www.politics.co.uk/.
42.
Politico UK, https://www.politico.eu/country/united-kingdom/.
43.
Evans, G., Tilley, J.: The new politics of class: the political exclusion of the British working class. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2017).
44.
Curtice, J.: ‘Why Leave Won the UK’s EU Referendum’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 55, 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12613.
45.
Ford, R., Goodwin, M.: Britain After Brexit A Nation Divided. Journal of Democracy. 28, 17–30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2017.0002.
46.
Sara B. Hobolt: The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent’. Journal of European Public Policy. 23, 1259–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785.
47.
Ailsa Henderson, Charlie Jeffery, Dan Wincott, Richard Wyn Jones: How Brexit was made in England. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 19, 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117730542.
48.
Sascha O Becker, Thiemo Fetzer, Dennis Novy: Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis. Economic Policy. 32, 601–650. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eix012.
49.
Ashcroft, Lord: How the United Kingdom voted on Thursday... and why - Lord Ashcroft Polls, https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why/#more-14746.
50.
Harold D. Clarke, Matthew Goodwin, Paul Whiteley: Why Britain Voted for Brexit: An Individual-Level Analysis of the 2016 Referendum Vote. Parliamentary Affairs. 70, 439–464. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx005.
51.
Goodwin, M., Milazzo, C.: Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 19, 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117710799.
52.
Richard Ashcroft, Mark Bevir: Pluralism, National Identity and Citizenship: Britain after Brexit. The Political Quarterly. 87, 355–359. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12293.
53.
Virdee, S., McGeever, B.: Racism, Crisis, Brexit. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 41, 1802–1819. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2017.1361544.
54.
Neil Lee, Katy Morris, Thomas Kemeny: Immobility and the Brexit vote. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 11, 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx027.
55.
Lorenza Antonucci, Laszlo Horvath, Yordan Kutiyski, André Krouwel: The malaise of the squeezed middle: Challenging the narrative of the ‘left behind’ Brexiter. Competition & Change. 21, 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529417704135.
56.
Kaufmann, E.: ‘It’s NOT the economy, stupid: Brexit as a story of personal values’, LSE British Politics and Policy blog, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/personal-values-brexit-vote/.
57.
Jackson, D., Thorsen, E., Wring, D. eds: EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. CSJCC (Bournemouth University), CRCC (Loughborough University), and Political Studies Association.
58.
Beetham, D.: What is Britishness? Citizenship, Values and Identity, Red Pepper, http://www.redpepper.org.uk/what-is-britishness-citizenship/.
59.
Colley, L.: Britishness in the 21st Century, https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20040809182858/http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/Page3049.asp, (8)AD.
60.
Krishan Kumar: Nation and Empire: English and British National Identity in Comparative Perspective. Theory and Society. 29, 575–608 (2000).
61.
Atkins, J.: (Re)imagining Magna Carta: Myth, Metaphor and the Rhetoric of Britishness. Parliamentary Affairs. 69, 603–620. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv057.
62.
Kenny, M., Gifford, C., Vines, E., Wellings, B.: Roundtable on English Nationalism and Euroscepticism, British Politics, September 2015. British Politics. 10,.
63.
Clarke, H.D., Kaufmann, E., Reeves, R., Savage, M., Tilley, J., Evans, G.: Symposium: James Tilley and Geoffrey Evans, The New Politics of Class. The Political Quarterly. 88, (2017).
64.
Devine, F.: Class. In: The Oxford Handbook of British Politics. Oxford University Press (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199230952.003.0033.
65.
Harmer, E., Southern, R.: More Stable than Strong: Women’s Representation, Voters and Issues. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx072.
66.
Sobolewska, M.: Party Strategies and the Descriptive Representation of Ethnic Minorities: The 2010 British General Election. West European Politics. 36, 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.773729.
67.
MacKay, F.: Gender. In: The Oxford Handbook of British Politics. pp. 646–662. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199230952.003.0035.
68.
Catalano, A.: Women Acting for Women? An Analysis of Gender and Debate Participation in the British House of Commons, 2005–2007. Politics & Gender. 5, 45–68.
69.
Smith, J.C.: Politics and Parenthood: An Examination of UK Party Leadership Elections. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx016.
70.
Ross, K., Evans, E., Harrison, L., Shears, M., Wadia, K.: The Gender of News and News of Gender: A Study of Sex, Politics, and Press Coverage of the 2010 British General Election. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 18, 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161212457814.
71.
Emily Harmer: Men Writing about Men: Media and the UK General Election 2015, https://blog.lboro.ac.uk/crcc/general-election/men-writing-about-men-media-and-the-uk-general-election-2015/.
72.
UK Election Analysis 2017: Media, Voters and the Campaign, http://www.electionanalysis.uk/.
73.
Higgins, M., McKay, F.M.: Gender and the Development of a Political Persona: The Case of Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon. British Politics. 283–300 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.44.
74.
Intimidation in Public Life: A Review by the Committee on Standards in Public Life, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/666927/6.3637_CO_v6_061217_Web3.1__2_.pdf.
75.
World Economic Forum, Global Gender Gap Report 2017, https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-gender-gap-report-2017, (2017).
76.
Ben Clements, Clive D. Field: Public Opinion toward Homosexuality and Gay Rights in Great Britain. Public Opinion Quarterly. 78, 523–547. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu018.
77.
Clements, B.: Partisan Attachments and Attitudes towards Same-Sex Marriage in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs. 67, 232–244 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gst003.
78.
Chaney, P.: ‘Institutionally Homophobic? Political Parties and the Substantive Representation of LGBT People: Westminster and Regional UK Elections 1945–2011’. Policy & Politics. 41, 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557312X645793.
79.
Evans, J., Tonge, J.: Partisan and religious drivers of moral conservatism: Same-sex marriage and abortion in Northern Ireland. Party Politics. 24, 335–346 (13)AD. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816656665.
80.
Ford, R.: Is Racial Prejudice Declining in Britain? The British Journal of Sociology. 59, 609–636. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00212.x.
81.
Magne Flemmen, Mike Savage: The politics of nationalism and white racism in the UK. The British Journal of Sociology. 68, S233–S264 (2017).
82.
Thrasher, M., Borisyuk, G., Rallings, C., Webber, R.: Candidate Ethnic Origins and Voter Preferences: Examining Name Discrimination in Local Elections in Britain. British Journal of Political Science. 47, 413–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000125.
83.
Meer, N.: The Politics of Voluntary and Involuntary Identities: Are Muslims in Britain an Ethnic, Racial or Religious Minority? Patterns of Prejudice. 42, 61–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313220701805901.
84.
Parveen Akhtar, Timothy Peace: Ethnic minorities in British politics: candidate selection and clan politics in the Labour Party. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1443804.
85.
Heath, A.F., Fisher, S.D., Sanders, D., Sobolewska, M.: Ethnic Heterogeneity in the Social Bases of Voting at the 2010 British General Election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 21, 255–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2011.562611.
86.
Saalfeld, T., Bischof, D.B.: Minority-Ethnic MPs and the Substantive Representation of Minority Interests in the House of Commons, 2005-2011. Parliamentary Affairs. 66, 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss084.
87.
Meer, N., Modood, T.: The Multicultural State We’re In: Muslims, ‘Multiculture’ and the ‘Civic Re-balancing’ of British Multiculturalism. Political Studies. 57, 473–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00745.x.
88.
David Sanders, Stephen D. Fisher, Anthony Heath, Maria Sobolewska: The democratic engagement of Britain’s ethnic minorities. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 37, 120–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.827795.
89.
Shulman, S.: Challenging the Civic/Ethnic and West/East Dichotomies in the Study of Nationalism. Comparative Political Studies. 35, 554–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035005003.
90.
Taylor-Gooby, P., Waite, E.: Toward a More Pragmatic Multiculturalism? How the U.K. Policy Community Sees the Future of Ethnic Diversity Policies. Governance. 27, 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12030.
91.
Hirsch, A.: Brit(ish): on race, identity and belonging. Jonathan Cape, London (2018).
92.
David Olusoga: The reality of being black in today’s Britain’, Guardian. Guardian. (29)AD.
93.
Olusoga, D.: Black and British: a forgotten history. Macmillan, London (2016).
94.
Crouch, J., Minhas, P.: Multicultural Britain in the 21st Century - Opinium research, https://www.opinium.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Multicultural-Britain-2017-v6.pdf, (2017).
95.
Squires, J.: Intersecting Inequalities: Britain’s Equality Review. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 11, 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616740903237459.
96.
Evans, E.: Diversity Matters: Intersectionality and Women’s Representation in the USA and UK. Parliamentary Affairs. 69, 569–585 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv063.
97.
Ward, O.: Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 22, 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161216673195.
98.
Krook, M.L., Nugent, M.K.: Intersectional institutions: Representing women and ethnic minorities in the British Labour Party. Party Politics. 22, 620–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816655564.
99.
Lijphart, A.: Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Yale University Press, New Haven (2012).
100.
Russell, M., Cowley, P.: ‘The Policy Power of the Westminster Parliament: The “Parliamentary State” and the Empirical Evidence’. Governance. 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12149.
101.
Howarth, D.: ‘Westminster versus Whitehall: Two Incompatible Views of the Constitution’, UK Constitutional Law Association blog, https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/04/10/david-howarth-westminster-versus-whitehall-two-incompatible-views-of-the-constitution/.
102.
Dowding, K.: ‘The Prime Ministerialisation of the British Prime Minister’. Parliamentary Affairs. 66, 617–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss007.
103.
Heffernan, R.: Prime Ministerial Predominance? Core Executive Politics in the UK. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 5, 347–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00110.
104.
Heffernan, R., Webb, P.: The British Prime Minister: Much More Than ‘First Among Equals’. In: The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. pp. 26–62. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005).
105.
Richard Heffernan, Paul Webb: The British Prime Minister: Much More Than ‘First Among Equals. In: The presidentialization of politics: a comparative study of modern democracies. pp. 26–62. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005). https://doi.org/DOI:10.1093/0199252017.003.0002.
106.
Richard Heffernan: Exploring (and Explaining) the British Prime Minister. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 7, 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00203.x.
107.
Bevir, M., Rhodes, R.A.W.: Prime Ministers, Presidentialism and Westminster Smokescreens. Political Studies. 54, 671–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00632.x.
108.
Bennister, M., Heffernan, R.: Cameron as Prime Minister: The Intra-Executive Politics of Britain’s Coalition Government. Parliamentary Affairs. 65, 778–801. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsr061.
109.
Byrne, C., Theakston, K.: Understanding the power of the prime minister: structure and agency in models of prime ministerial power’. British Politics. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-018-0087-7.
110.
Foley, M.: The British Presidency: Tony Blair and the Politics of Public Leadership. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2000).
111.
Russell, M., Cowley, P.: Modes of UK Executive-Legislative Relations Revisited. The Political Quarterly. 89, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12463.
112.
Russell, M., Gover, D., Wollter, K., Benton, M.: Actors, Motivations and Outcomes in the Legislative Process: Policy Influence at Westminster. Government and Opposition. 52, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2015.25.
113.
Meg Russell, Bob Morris, Phil Larkin: Fitting the Bill: Bringing Commons Legislation Committees into Line with Best Practice, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/research/parliament/legislative-committees.
114.
Russell, M.: ''Never Allow a Crisis Go To Waste: The Wright Committee Reforms to Strengthen the House of Commons". Parliamentary Affairs. 64, 612–633. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsr026.
115.
Russell, M.: A Stronger Second Chamber? Assessing the Impact of House of Lords Reform in 1999 and the Lessons for Bicameralism. Political Studies. 58, 866–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00810.x.
116.
Dunleavy, P.: Audit 2017: How effective is the Westminster Parliament in scrutinising central government policy-making?’ : Democratic Audit UK, http://www.democraticaudit.com/2017/08/31/audit-2017-how-effective-is-the-westminster-parliament-in-scrutinising-central-government-policy-making/.
117.
Matthews, F.: Majoritarianism Reinterpreted: Effective Representation and the Quality of Westminster Democracy. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx011.
118.
Kalitowski, S.: Rubber Stamp or Cockpit? The Impact of Parliament on Government Legislation. Parliamentary Affairs. 61, 694–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn030.
119.
Joni Lovenduski: Prime Minister’s questions as political ritual. British Politics. 7, 314–340. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2012.13.
120.
Thompson, L.: More of the Same or a Period of Change? The Impact of Bill Committees in the Twenty-First Century House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs. 66, 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gss016.
121.
Thompson, L.: Debunking the Myths of Bill Committees in the British House of Commons. Politics. 36, 36–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12094.
122.
Wolkenstein, F.: The Labour party, Momentum and the problem with intra-party democracy: Democratic Audit UK, http://www.democraticaudit.com/2016/10/31/the-labour-party-momentum-and-the-problem-with-intra-party-democracy/.
123.
Hobolt, S.B.: Brexit and the 2017 UK General Election. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 56, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12751.
124.
Audickas, L., Dempsey, N., Keen, R.: Membership of UK political parties - House of Commons Library report, https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN05125, (3)AD.
125.
Bale, T., Webb, P., Poletti, M.: ‘Grassroots: Britain’s party members: who they are, what they think and what they do’ - Mile End Institute report, https://esrcpartymembersprojectorg.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/grassroots-pmp_final.pdf.
126.
Pettitt, R.T.: The ‘how’ of election manifestos in the British Labour Party’. Party Politics. 24, 289–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068816678889.
127.
Dorey, P., Denham, A.: ‘The Longest Suicide Vote in History’: The Labour Party Leadership Election of 2015. British Politics. 11, 259–282 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-016-0001-0.
128.
Seyd, P., Whiteley, P.: British Party Members: An Overview. Party Politics. 10, 355–366 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068804043903.
129.
Kavanagh, D.: Power in British political parties: Iron law or special pleading? West European Politics. 8, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402388508424538.
130.
Katz, R.S.: No man can serve two masters. Party Politics. 20, 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068813519967.
131.
Norris, P.: May’s Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited. Party Politics. 1, 29–47 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001002.
132.
Lehrer, R.: Intra-Party Democracy and Party Responsiveness. West European Politics. 35, 1295–1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.713747.
133.
Shaw, E.: Mandatory reselection: lessons from Labour’s past, https://constitution-unit.com/2018/11/08/mandatory-reselection-lessons-from-labours-past/.
134.
Denver, D.: ‘Valence Politics’: How Britain Votes Now’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 7, 292–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00171.x.
135.
Clarke, H., Sanders, D., Stewart, M., Whiteley, P.: ‘Valence Politics and Electoral Choice in Britain, 2010’. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 21, 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2011.562614.
136.
Harold D. Clarke, et al: Valence Politics. In: Political choice in Britain. pp. 1–16. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004). https://doi.org/DOI:10.1093/019924488X.003.0010.
137.
Green, J., Hobolt, S.B.: Owning the Issue Agenda: Party Strategies and Vote Choices in British Elections. Electoral Studies. 27, 460–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.02.003.
138.
Rabinowitz, G., Macdonald, S.E.: A Directional Theory of Issue Voting. The American Political Science Review. 83,. https://doi.org/10.2307/1956436.
139.
Brandenburg, H., Johns, R.: The Declining Representativeness of the British Party System, and Why It Matters. Political Studies. 62, 704–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12050.
140.
Dommett, K.: Ideological Quietism? Ideology and Party Politics in Britain. Political Studies. n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12160.
141.
Bernard Grofman: Downs and Two-Party Convergence. Annual Review of Political Science. 7, 25–46 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104711.
142.
Lees-Marshment, J.: The Marriage of Politics and Marketing. Political Studies. 49, 692–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00337.
143.
Jonathan Mellon, Geoffrey Evans, Edward Fieldhouse, Jane Green, Christopher Prosser: Brexit or Corbyn? Campaign and Inter-Election Vote Switching in the 2017 UK General Election. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, 719–737. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsy001.
144.
Ivor Crewe, Donald D. Searing: Ideological Change in the British Conservative Party. The American Political Science Review. 82,. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957391.
145.
Jessop, B.: Margaret Thatcher and Thatcherism: Dead but not buried. British Politics. 10, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2014.22.
146.
Steve Buckler, David Dolowitz: Ideology Matters: Party Competition, Ideological Positioning and the Case of the Conservative Party under David Cameron. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 14, 576–594 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00482.x.
147.
Peter Kerr, Christopher Byrne, Emma Foster: Theorising Cameronism. Political Studies Review. 9, 193–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00232.x.
148.
Richard Hayton: Constructing a New Conservatism: Ideology and Values. In: Peele, G. and Francis, J. (eds.) David Cameron and Conservative renewal : the limits of modernisation? pp. 41–57. Manchester University Press (2016).
149.
Hayton, R., McEnhill, L.: Cameron’s Conservative Party, social liberalism and social justice. British Politics. 10, 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.19.
150.
Timothy Heppell: Cameron and Liberal Conservatism: Attitudes within the Parliamentary Conservative Party and Conservative Ministers. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 15, 340–361. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00546.x.
151.
Martin Smith, Rhonda Jones: From big society to small state: Conservatism and the privatisation of government. British Politics. 10, 226–248. https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2015.23.
152.
Tim Bale: The Conservative Party: From Thatcher to Cameron. Polity, Cambridge (2016).
153.
Dorey, P., Garnett, M.: The weaker-willed, the craven-hearted : the decline of One Nation Conservatism. Global discourse. 5, 69–91 (2015).
154.
Heath, A.: Theresa May’s speech shows that free-market ideas are in decline - Daily Telegraph, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/10/05/no-prime-minister-the-government-doesnt-always-know-whats-best/.
155.
Hall, M.: Theresa May promises bright future for all in conference speech - Daily Express, http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/718107/Theresa-May-promises-bright-future-for-all.
156.
Kriss, S.: Theresa May’s Conference Speech Gave a Monstrous Ideology a Human Face, Vice UK, http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/theresa-may-conference-speech-2016.
157.
Theresa May’s speech to the Conservative Party Conference, 5 October 2016, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37563510.
158.
Vincent, A.: New Ideologies for Old? The Political Quarterly. 69, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.00136.
159.
Michael Freeden: The Ideology of New Labour. The Political Quarterly. 70, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.00203.
160.
Heffernan, R.: ‘Labour’s New Labour Legacy: Politics after Blair and Brown’. Political Studies Review. 9, 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00230.x.
161.
Atkins, J.: Narrating One Nation: The Ideology and Rhetoric of the Miliband Labour Party. Politics. 35, 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12076.
162.
Peter Dorey, Andrew Denham: The Longest Suicide Vote in History: The Labour Party Leadership Election of 2015. British Politics. Volume 11, 259–282. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-016-0001-0.
163.
Ben Jackson: Labour’s ideology: towards common ground. Renewal - A Journal of Social Democracy. 23, 5–10 (2015).
164.
Nadia Khomami: What does Jeremy Corbyn think? - The Guardian, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/12/what-does-jeremy-corbyn-think.
165.
Tom Quinn: What did Corbyn say in his Conference speech? - Prospect Magazine, http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/what-did-corbyn-say-in-his-conference-speech.
166.
Wilkinson, M.: Jeremy Corbyn pledges socialism for 21st century as he plans business tax hike and benefits free-for-all., http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/28/jeremy-corbyn-immigration-labour-conference-speech-live/.
167.
Jeremy Corbyn’s speech to the Labour Party conference, 28 September 2016, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37500290.
168.
The Conservative Party.
169.
Labour Party, http://www.labour.org.uk/.
170.
The Liberal Democrats.
171.
SNP (Scottish National Party), http://www.snp.org/.
172.
UKIP (the United Kingdom Independence Party), http://www.ukip.org/.
174.
Ros Taylor: How well does the UK’s media system support democratic politics and represent citizens’ interests? - Democratic Audit UK, http://www.democraticaudit.com/2018/08/30/2018audit-how-well-does-the-uks-media-system-support-democratic-politics-and-represent-citizens-interests/.
175.
Chadwick, A., Vaccari, C., O’Loughlin, B.: Do tabloids poison the well of social media? Explaining democratically dysfunctional news sharing’. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818769689.
176.
Stephen Ward, Dominic Wring: Out with the Old, In with the New? The Media Campaign. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx057.
177.
Tony Blair and others: Tony Blair’s Reuters Speech on the Media and responses. Political Quarterly. Volume 78, 471–498.
178.
The Political Quarterly : Vol 78 , No 4. The Political Quarterly. 78,.
179.
Ken Newton: Public Service and Commercial Broadcasting: Impacts on Politics and Society. The Political Quarterly. 87, 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12214.
180.
Barnett, S., Seaton, J.: Why the BBC Matters: Memo to the New Parliament about a Unique British Institution. The Political Quarterly. 81, 327–332. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2010.02117.x.
181.
Newton, K.: May the Weak Force Be with You: The Power of the Mass Media in Modern Politics. European Journal of Political Research. 45, 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00296.x.
182.
Ringen, S.: Why the British Press Is Brilliant. British Journalism Review. 14, 31–37 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/09564748030143007.
183.
Paul Baker, Costas Gabrielatos, Tony McEnery: Sketching Muslims: A Corpus Driven Analysis of Representations Around the Word ‘Muslim’ in the British Press 1998–2009. Applied Linguistics. 34, 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ams048.
184.
Narayanan, V., Howard, P.N., Kollanyi, B., Elswah, M.: Russian Involvement and Junk News during Brexit – Oxford Internet Institute, https://blogs.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/93/2017/12/Russia-and-Brexit-v27.pdf.
185.
Monica Kaminska, John D. Gallacher, Bence Kollanyi, Taha Yasseri, Philip N. Howard: Social Media and News Sources during the 2017 UK General Election – Oxford Internet Institute, http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/social-media-and-news-sources-during-the-2017-uk-general-election/.
186.
Stephen Ward, Dominic Wring: Out with the Old, In with the New? The Media Campaign. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx057.
187.
Dommett, K., Temple, L.: Digital Campaigning: The Rise of Facebook and Satellite Campaigns. Parliamentary Affairs. 71, 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsx056.
188.
Elizabeth Dubois, Grant Blank: The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society. 21, 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656.
189.
Breeze, R.: '"Enemies of the people”: Populist performances in the Daily Mail reporting of the Article 50 case’. Discourse, Context & Media. 25, 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2018.03.008.
190.
Julianne Kerr Morrison, Ravi Naik, Stephanie Hankey: Data and Democracy in the Digital Age, The Constitution Society, https://consoc.org.uk/publications/data-and-democracy-in-the-digital-age/, (10)AD.
191.
House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, ‘Disinformation and “Fake News”: Final Report’, Eighth Report of Session 2017-19, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/1791/1791.pdf, (14)AD.
192.
Colm O’Cinneide: Human rights and the UK constitution, British Academy, http://www.britac.ac.uk/policy/Human-rights.cfm, (2012).
193.
Mark Bevir: The Westminster Model, Governance and Judicial Reform. Parliamentary Affairs. 61, 559–577. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsn025.
194.
Masterman, R.: ‘Labour’s “Juridification” of the Constitution’. Parliamentary Affairs. 62, 476–492. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsp013.
195.
Anthony King: The Judges Come Out. In: The British Constitution. pp. 115–149. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
196.
Anthony King: The Judges Come Out. In: The British constitution. pp. 116–150. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
197.
Colm O’Cinneide: Human Rights and the UK Constitution. In: The Changing Constitution. pp. 67–103. Oxford University Press (2015).
198.
Ministry of Justice, ‘Responding to Human Rights judgments: Report to the Joint Committee on Human Rights on the Government’s response to Human Rights judgments 2017–18’, November 2018, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/756346/responding-human-rights-judgments-2017-18.pdf.
199.
Ewing, K.D.: The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy. Modern Law Review. 62, 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00192.
200.
Ewing, K.D., Tham, J.-C.: The Continuing Futility of the Human Rights Act. Public Law. 668–693 (2008).
201.
K.D. Ewing: The Resilience of the Political Constitution. German Law Journal. 14, 2111–2136 (2013).
202.
Aileen Kavanagh: ‘What’s so Weak About “Weak-Form Review”? The Case of the UK Human Rights Act 1998’. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2015). https://doi.org/https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/13/4/1008/2450828.
203.
Stephen Gardbaum: What’s so weak about "weak-form review”? A reply to Aileen Kavanagh. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 13, 1040–1048. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mov063.
204.
Adrian Vermeule: The Atrophy of Constitutional Powers. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 32, 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqs010.
205.
Neil Johnston: Prisoners’ voting rights: developments since May 2015 - House of Commons Library briefing paper CBP-7461, https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7461, (11)AD.
206.
Adams, E.: 'Prisoners’ Voting Rights: Case Closed?’, UK Constitutional Law Association blog, https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/01/30/elizabeth-adams-prisoners-voting-rights-case-closed/.
207.
Vernon Bogdanor: Brexit and our unprotected constitution - The Constitution Society, https://consoc.org.uk/publications/brexit-unprotected-british-constitution/.
208.
Young, Alison L.: The Constitutional Implications of Brexit. European Public Law. 23, 757–786 (2017).
209.
Michael Blauberger, Susanne K. Schmidt: The European Court of Justice and its political impact. West European Politics. 40, 907–918. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2017.1281652.
210.
Michael Blauberger, Anita Heindlmaier, Dion Kramer, Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen, Angelika Schenk, Jessica Sampson Thierry, Benjamin Werner: ECJ Judges Read the Morning Papers. Explaining the Turnaround of European Citizenship Jurisprudence’. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1–41. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3123003.
211.
Donald, A., Gordon, J., Leach, P.: The UK and the European Court of Human Rights – Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report 83, http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/documents/research/83._european_court_of_human_rights.pdf, (2012).
212.
Hazell, R., Sandford, M.: English Question or Union Question? Neither Has Easy Answers. The Political Quarterly. 86, 16–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12132.
213.
Sheldon, J.: Intergovernmental relations and the English question: options for reform. Constitution Unit Blog, https://constitution-unit.com/2018/08/16/intergovernmental-relations-and-the-english-question-options-for-reform/.
214.
Torrance, D.: Intergovernmental relations in the United Kingdom, House of Commons Library briefing, https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8371, (24)AD.
215.
House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Devolution and Exiting the EU: Reconciling Differences and Building Strong Relationships, Eighth Report of Session 2017-19, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmpubadm/1485/1485.pdf, (31)AD.
216.
Anthony King: John Bull’s Other Lands. In: The British Constitution. pp. 179–214. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
217.
King, A.: The British constitution. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
218.
Curtice, J.: A Stronger or Weaker Union? Public Reactions to Asymmetric Devolution in the United Kingdom. Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 36, 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjj006.
219.
Nicola McEwen: Still better together? Purpose and power in intergovernmental councils in the UK. Regional & Federal Studies. 27, 667–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2017.1389724.
220.
Jeffery, C.: As devolution has progressed the centre has failed to imagine a new rationale for the union, UCL Constitution Unit Blog, https://constitution-unit.com/2015/10/06/as-devolution-has-progressed-the-centre-has-failed-to-imagine-a-new-rationale-for-the-union/.
221.
The Political Quarterly. 86,.
222.
Trench, A.: Devolution in the Round: Can Britain Continue to Muddle through? Political Insight. 5, 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-9066.12066.
223.
The Smith Commission, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20151202171017/http://www.smith-commission.scot/.
224.
House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Devolution and Exiting the EU: Reconciling Differences and Building Strong Relationships, Eighth Report of Session 2017-19, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmpubadm/1485/1485.pdf, (31)AD.
225.
Meg Russell, Jack Sheldon: Options for an English Parliament - UCL Constitution Unit report, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/research/parliament/english-parliament, (2018).
226.
Campaign for an English Parliament, http://thecep.org.uk/.
227.
John Denham: A nation divided? The identities, politics and governance of England, openDemocracy UK blog, https://www.opendemocracy.net/uk/john-denham/nation-divided-identities-politics-and-governance-of-england.
228.
Hazell, R.: The English Question. Manchester University Press, Manchester (2006).
229.
Richard Kelly: English votes for English laws - House of Commons Library briefing. (20)AD.
230.
Daniel Gover, Michael Kenny: One year of EVEL: evaluating ‘English votes for English laws’ in the House of Commons - The UCL Constitution Unit Blog, https://constitution-unit.com/2016/11/28/one-year-of-evel-evaluating-english-votes-for-english-laws-in-the-house-of-commons/.
231.
Vaughne Miller: How much legislation comes from Europe? – House of Commons Library Research Briefing, http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/RP10-62, (13)AD.
232.
Simon Bulmer, Martin Burch: The Europeanization of UK Government: from Quiet Revolution to Explicit Step-Change? Public Administration. 83, 861–890. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00481.x.
233.
John Curtice, Sarah Tipping: A more informed public? The impact of the Brexit debate. In: British Social Attitudes. pp. 1–33. NatCen Social Research (2018).
234.
HMG, Review of the Balance of Competences. Foreign & Commonwealth Office (2012).
235.
Mark Elliott: United Kingdom: Parliamentary Sovereignty under Pressure. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2, 545–555 (2004).
236.
John Curtice: Euroscepticism. In: British Social Attitudes 33. pp. 1–19. NatCen Social Research (2016).
237.
John Curtice, Sarah Tipping: A more informed public? The impact of the Brexit debate. In: British Social Attitudes. pp. 1–33. NatCen Social Research (2018).
238.
Eurobarometer - European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/General/index.
239.
Lord Ashcroft: You Should Hear What They Say about You, Lord Ashcroft polling report, https://lordashcroftpolls.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/LORD-ASHCROFT-POLLS-You-Should-Hear-What-They-Say-About-You-EU28-Poll-Report-Feb-2016.pdf.
240.
Buller, J.: Britain as an Awkward Partner: Reassessing Britain’s Relations with the EU. Politics. 15, 33–42 (1995).
241.
Stephen George: A Reply to Buller. Politics. 15, 43–47.
242.
Wilks, S.: Britain and Europe: An Awkward Partner or an Awkward State? Politics. 16, 159–165.
243.
Oliver Daddow, Tim Oliver: A not so awkward partner: the UK has been a champion of many causes in the EU, LSE Brexit blog, http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2016/04/15/a-not-so-awkward-partner-the-uk-has-been-a-champion-of-many-causes-in-the-eu/.
244.
Vivien A. Schmidt: Procedural democracy in the EU: the Europeanization of national and sectoral policy-making processes’. Journal of European Public Policy. 13, 670–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760600808444.
245.
Oliver Daddow: The UK media and ‘Europe’: from permissive consensus to destructive dissent. International Affairs. 88, 1219–1236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01129.x.
246.
Nicholas Startin: Have we reached a tipping point? The mainstreaming of Euroscepticism in the UK. International Political Science Review. 36, 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512115574126.
247.
Lori Thorlakson: Britain’s Place in the European Union. In: Developments in British Politics. pp. 257–279. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011).
248.
Vernon Bogdanor: Europe and the Sovereignty of the People. The Political Quarterly. 87, 348–351. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12297.
249.
Deborah Mabbett: Parliamentary Sovereignty and Brexit. The Political Quarterly. 88, 167–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12364.
250.
Keith Ewing: Brexit and Parliamentary Sovereignty. The Modern Law Review. 80, 711–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12281.
251.
Owen, J., Lloyd, L., Rutter, J.: Preparing Brexit: How ready is Whitehall? - Institute for Government report. (10)AD.
252.
Joe Owen, Tim Durrant, Lewis Lloyd, Jill Rutter: Brexit: six months to go - Institute for Government report. (17)AD.
253.
John Curtice: Do voters still want to leave the EU? How they view the Brexit process two years on - UK in a changing Europe report, http://ukandeu.ac.uk/research-papers/do-voters-still-want-to-leave-the-eu-how-they-view-the-brexit-process-two-years-on/.
254.
Matthew Bevington, Jack Simson Caird, Alan Wager: The Brexit Endgame: A Short Guide - UK in a Changing Europe report, http://ukandeu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Brexit-endgame-a-short-guide.pdf, (29)AD.
255.
House of Commons Exiting the EU Committee, ‘Parliamentary Scrutiny and Approval of the Withdrawal Agreement and Negotiations on a Future Relationship’, Sixth Report of Session 2017-19, https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmexeu/1240/1240.pdf, (28)AD.
256.
Constitution Unit Blog - Brexit theme, https://constitution-unit.com/category/europe/.
257.
Alan Renwick, Meg Russell: Monitor 64: Brexit and the transformation of British politics. UCL Constitution Unit Blog, https://constitution-unit.com/2016/10/24/monitor-64-brexit-and-the-transformation-of-british-politics/.
258.
Alan Renwick: The process of Brexit: what comes next? UCL Constitution Unit Blog, https://constitution-unit.com/2017/02/08/the-process-of-brexit-what-comes-next/.
259.
Philip Lynch, Richard Whitaker: Divided but influential? The Exiting the European Union select committee. UCL Constitution Unit Blog, https://constitution-unit.com/2018/05/10/divided-but-influential-the-exiting-the-european-union-select-committee/.
260.
Nicola McEwen: Crisis, headache, or sideshow: how should the UK government respond to the Scottish parliament’s decision to withhold consent for the Withdrawal Bill? UCL Constitution Unit Blog, https://constitution-unit.com/2018/05/30/crisis-headache-or-sideshow-how-should-the-uk-government-respond-to-the-scottish-parliaments-decision-to-withhold-consent-for-the-withdrawal-bill/.
261.
Mark Elliott, Jack Williams, Alison Young: The executive’s Brexit: the UK Constitution after Miller. UCL Constitution Unit Blog, https://constitution-unit.com/2018/08/21/the-executives-brexit-the-uk-constitution-after-miller/#more-6958.
262.
Wincott, D.: Brexit and the territorial constitution: déjà vu all over again? UCL Constitution Unit Blog, https://constitution-unit.com/2018/09/11/brexit-and-the-territorial-constitution-deja-vu-all-over-again/.
263.
Jess Sargeant, Alan Renwick, Meg Russell: The Mechanics of a Further Referendum on Brexit. UCL Constitution Unit report, https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/research/electionsandreferendums/The_Mechanics_of_a_Further_Referendum_on_Brexit.
264.
Vernon Bogdanor, Dominic Grieve, Joe Owen, Tony Travers: Brexit: the impact on government and parliament - seminar at the LSE, http://www.lse.ac.uk/european-institute/events/2018-19/Impact-on-Government/Brexit-the-impact-on-government-and-parliament.