[2]
M. Garnett and P. Lynch, Exploring British politics, Fourth edition. London: Routledge, 2016.
[3]
B. Jones and P. Norton, Politics UK, 8th ed. London: Routledge, 2014.
[4]
R. Leach, B. Coxall, and L. Robins, British Politics, 2nd ed., vol. Palgrave foundations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
[5]
J. Kingdom and P. Fairclough, Government and Politics in Britain, 4th ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2014.
[6]
M. Moran, Politics and Governance in the UK, 3rd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.
[7]
Bogdanor, Vernon, The New British Constitution. Oxford: Hart, 2009.
[8]
Anthony King, Who Governs Britain? Pelican, 2015.
[9]
A. S. King, The British constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576982.001.0001
[10]
R. Heffernan, C. Hay, M. Russell, and P. Cowley, Eds., Developments in British Politics 10, 10th edition. London: Palgrave, 2016.
[11]
P. Cowley and R. Ford, Eds., Sex, Lies, and the Ballot Box: 50 Things You Need to Know about British Elections. London: Biteback Publishing, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1824617
[12]
G. Evans and A. Menon, Brexit and British politics. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2017.
[13]
‘The Political Quarterly’ [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291467-923X
[14]
‘Parliamentary Affairs’.
[15]
‘British Politics’ [Online]. Available: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/bp/archive/index.html
[16]
‘Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties’ [Online]. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fbep20#.VkoDULH2qhh
[17]
‘Political Insight’ [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)2041-9066
[18]
‘UK Parliament – Homepage’. .
[19]
‘UK Parliament – Research Briefings’. [Online]. Available: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/
[20]
‘How Government Works – gov.uk’. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/how-government-works
[21]
‘Prime Minister’s Office, 10 Downing Street – gov.uk’. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street
[22]
‘Palgrave Macmillan - Politics and Governance in the UK - Michael Moran’. [Online]. Available: https://www.macmillanihe.com/companion/Moran-Politics-And-Governance-In-The-Uk-3e/
[23]
‘Constitution Unit’. .
[24]
‘The Constitution Unit Blog’. [Online]. Available: http://constitution-unit.com/
[25]
‘LSE British Politics and Policy blog’. [Online]. Available: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/
[26]
‘UK Constitutional Law Association blog’. [Online]. Available: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/
[27]
‘Democratic Audit UK blog’. [Online]. Available: http://www.democraticaudit.com/
[28]
‘Open Democracy UK’. [Online]. Available: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/
[29]
‘BBC News’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news
[30]
‘Sky News’. [Online]. Available: http://news.sky.com/
[31]
‘Channel 4 News’. [Online]. Available: http://www.channel4.com/news/
[32]
‘The Guardian’. [Online]. Available: http://www.theguardian.com/uk
[33]
‘The Times’. [Online]. Available: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/
[34]
‘Daily Telegraph’. [Online]. Available: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/
[35]
‘Financial Times’. [Online]. Available: http://www.ft.com/home/uk
[36]
‘Daily Mail’. [Online]. Available: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html
[37]
‘Daily Express’. [Online]. Available: http://www.express.co.uk/
[38]
‘The Sun’. [Online]. Available: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/
[39]
‘Daily Mirror’. [Online]. Available: http://www.mirror.co.uk/
[40]
‘The Huffington Post UK’. [Online]. Available: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/
[41]
‘politics.co.uk’. [Online]. Available: http://www.politics.co.uk/
[42]
‘Politico UK’. [Online]. Available: https://www.politico.eu/country/united-kingdom/
[43]
G. Evans and J. Tilley, The new politics of class: the political exclusion of the British working class, First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755753.001.0001/acprof-9780198755753
[44]
J. Curtice, ‘“Why Leave Won the UK’s EU Referendum”’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 55, pp. 19–37, doi: 10.1111/jcms.12613.
[45]
R. Ford and M. Goodwin, ‘Britain After Brexit A Nation Divided’, Journal of Democracy, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 17–30, 2017, doi: 10.1353/jod.2017.0002.
[46]
Sara B. Hobolt, ‘The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent’’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1259–1277, doi: 10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785.
[47]
Ailsa Henderson, Charlie Jeffery, Dan Wincott, and Richard Wyn Jones, ‘How Brexit was made in England’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 631–646, doi: 10.1177/1369148117730542.
[48]
Sascha O Becker, Thiemo Fetzer, and Dennis Novy, ‘Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis’, Economic Policy, vol. 32, no. 92, pp. 601–650, doi: 10.1093/epolic/eix012.
[49]
Lord Ashcroft, ‘How the United Kingdom voted on Thursday... and why - Lord Ashcroft Polls’, 24AD. [Online]. Available: https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why/#more-14746
[50]
Harold D. Clarke, Matthew Goodwin, and Paul Whiteley, ‘Why Britain Voted for Brexit: An Individual-Level Analysis of the 2016 Referendum Vote’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 439–464, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsx005.
[51]
M. Goodwin and C. Milazzo, ‘Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 450–464, doi: 10.1177/1369148117710799.
[52]
Richard Ashcroft and Mark Bevir, ‘Pluralism, National Identity and Citizenship: Britain after Brexit’, The Political Quarterly, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 355–359, doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12293.
[53]
S. Virdee and B. McGeever, ‘Racism, Crisis, Brexit’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 1802–1819, doi: 10.1080/01419870.2017.1361544.
[54]
Neil Lee, Katy Morris, and Thomas Kemeny, ‘Immobility and the Brexit vote’, Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 143–163, doi: 10.1093/cjres/rsx027.
[55]
Lorenza Antonucci, Laszlo Horvath, Yordan Kutiyski, and André Krouwel, ‘The malaise of the squeezed middle: Challenging the narrative of the “left behind” Brexiter’, Competition & Change, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 211–229, doi: 10.1177/1024529417704135.
[56]
E. Kaufmann, ‘“It’s NOT the economy, stupid: Brexit as a story of personal values”, LSE British Politics and Policy blog’, 7AD. [Online]. Available: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/personal-values-brexit-vote/
[57]
D. Jackson, E. Thorsen, and D. Wring, Eds., EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign. CSJCC (Bournemouth University), CRCC (Loughborough University), and Political Studies Association [Online]. Available: http://www.referendumanalysis.eu/
[58]
D. Beetham, ‘What is Britishness? Citizenship, Values and Identity, Red Pepper’, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.redpepper.org.uk/what-is-britishness-citizenship/
[59]
L. Colley, ‘Britishness in the 21st Century’. 8AD [Online]. Available: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20040809182858/http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/Page3049.asp
[60]
Krishan Kumar, ‘Nation and Empire: English and British National Identity in Comparative Perspective’, Theory and Society, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 575–608, 2000 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3108547
[61]
J. Atkins, ‘(Re)imagining Magna Carta: Myth, Metaphor and the Rhetoric of Britishness’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 603–620, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsv057.
[62]
M. Kenny, C. Gifford, E. Vines, and B. Wellings, ‘Roundtable on English Nationalism and Euroscepticism, British Politics, September 2015’, British Politics, vol. 10, no. 3 [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/journal/41293/10/3/page/1
[63]
H. D. Clarke, E. Kaufmann, R. Reeves, M. Savage, J. Tilley, and G. Evans, ‘Symposium: James Tilley and Geoffrey Evans, The New Politics of Class’, The Political Quarterly, vol. 88, no. 4, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/1467923x/2017/88/4
[64]
F. Devine, ‘Class’, in The Oxford Handbook of British Politics, Oxford University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199230952.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199230952
[65]
E. Harmer and R. Southern, ‘More Stable than Strong: Women’s Representation, Voters and Issues’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 71, no. suppl_1, pp. 237–254, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsx072.
[66]
M. Sobolewska, ‘Party Strategies and the Descriptive Representation of Ethnic Minorities: The 2010 British General Election’, West European Politics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 615–633, doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.773729.
[67]
F. MacKay, ‘Gender’, in The Oxford Handbook of British Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 646–662 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199230952.001.0001
[68]
A. Catalano, ‘Women Acting for Women? An Analysis of Gender and Debate Participation in the British House of Commons, 2005–2007’, Politics & Gender, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 45–68 [Online]. Available: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=4495300&jid=PAG&volumeId=5&issueId=01&aid=4495292
[69]
J. C. Smith, ‘Politics and Parenthood: An Examination of UK Party Leadership Elections’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 196–217, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsx016.
[70]
K. Ross, E. Evans, L. Harrison, M. Shears, and K. Wadia, ‘The Gender of News and News of Gender: A Study of Sex, Politics, and Press Coverage of the 2010 British General Election’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 3–20, doi: 10.1177/1940161212457814.
[71]
Emily Harmer, ‘Men Writing about Men: Media and the UK General Election 2015’, 22AD. [Online]. Available: https://blog.lboro.ac.uk/crcc/general-election/men-writing-about-men-media-and-the-uk-general-election-2015/
[72]
‘UK Election Analysis 2017: Media, Voters and the Campaign’. [Online]. Available: http://www.electionanalysis.uk/
[73]
M. Higgins and F. M. McKay, ‘Gender and the Development of a Political Persona: The Case of Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon’, British Politics, pp. 283–300, 2015, doi: 10.1057/bp.2015.44.
[74]
‘Intimidation in Public Life: A Review by the Committee on Standards in Public Life’. [Online]. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/666927/6.3637_CO_v6_061217_Web3.1__2_.pdf
[75]
‘World Economic Forum, Global Gender Gap Report 2017’. World Economic Forum, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-gender-gap-report-2017
[76]
Ben Clements and Clive D. Field, ‘Public Opinion toward Homosexuality and Gay Rights in Great Britain’, Public Opinion Quarterly, vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 523–547, doi: 10.1093/poq/nfu018.
[77]
B. Clements, ‘Partisan Attachments and Attitudes towards Same-Sex Marriage in Britain’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 232–244, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1093/pa/gst003.
[78]
P. Chaney, ‘“Institutionally Homophobic? Political Parties and the Substantive Representation of LGBT People: Westminster and Regional UK Elections 1945–2011”’, Policy & Politics, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 101–121, doi: 10.1332/030557312X645793. [Online]. Available: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/tpp/pap/2013/00000041/00000001/art00006;jsessionid=9lt6hcn1b24fo.alice
[79]
J. Evans and J. Tonge, ‘Partisan and religious drivers of moral conservatism: Same-sex marriage and abortion in Northern Ireland’, Party Politics, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 335–346, 13AD, doi: 10.1177/1354068816656665.
[80]
R. Ford, ‘Is Racial Prejudice Declining in Britain?’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 609–636, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00212.x.
[81]
Magne Flemmen, Mike Savage, ‘The politics of nationalism and white racism in the UK’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 68, no. S1, pp. S233–S264, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-4446.12311
[82]
M. Thrasher, G. Borisyuk, C. Rallings, and R. Webber, ‘Candidate Ethnic Origins and Voter Preferences: Examining Name Discrimination in Local Elections in Britain’, British Journal of Political Science, vol. 47, no. 02, pp. 413–435, doi: 10.1017/S0007123415000125.
[83]
N. Meer, ‘The Politics of Voluntary and Involuntary Identities: Are Muslims in Britain an Ethnic, Racial or Religious Minority?’, Patterns of Prejudice, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 61–81, doi: 10.1080/00313220701805901.
[84]
Parveen Akhtar and Timothy Peace, ‘Ethnic minorities in British politics: candidate selection and clan politics in the Labour Party’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, pp. 1–17, doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1443804.
[85]
A. F. Heath, S. D. Fisher, D. Sanders, and M. Sobolewska, ‘Ethnic Heterogeneity in the Social Bases of Voting at the 2010 British General Election’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 255–277, doi: 10.1080/17457289.2011.562611.
[86]
T. Saalfeld and D. B. Bischof, ‘Minority-Ethnic MPs and the Substantive Representation of Minority Interests in the House of Commons, 2005-2011’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 305–328, doi: 10.1093/pa/gss084.
[87]
N. Meer and T. Modood, ‘The Multicultural State We’re In: Muslims, “Multiculture” and the “Civic Re-balancing” of British Multiculturalism’, Political Studies, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 473–497, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00745.x.
[88]
David Sanders, Stephen D. Fisher, Anthony Heath, and Maria Sobolewska, ‘The democratic engagement of Britain’s ethnic minorities’, Ethnic and Racial Studies, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 120–139, doi: 10.1080/01419870.2013.827795.
[89]
S. Shulman, ‘Challenging the Civic/Ethnic and West/East Dichotomies in the Study of Nationalism’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 554–585, doi: 10.1177/0010414002035005003.
[90]
P. Taylor-Gooby and E. Waite, ‘Toward a More Pragmatic Multiculturalism? How the U.K. Policy Community Sees the Future of Ethnic Diversity Policies’, Governance, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 267–289, doi: 10.1111/gove.12030.
[91]
A. Hirsch, Brit(ish): on race, identity and belonging. London: Jonathan Cape, 2018.
[92]
David Olusoga, ‘The reality of being black in today’s Britain’, Guardian’, Guardian, 29AD [Online]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/30/what-it-means-to-be-black-in-britain-today
[93]
D. Olusoga, Black and British: a forgotten history. London: Macmillan, 2016.
[94]
J. Crouch and P. Minhas, ‘Multicultural Britain in the 21st Century - Opinium research’. 2017 [Online]. Available: https://www.opinium.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Multicultural-Britain-2017-v6.pdf
[95]
J. Squires, ‘Intersecting Inequalities: Britain’s Equality Review’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 496–512, doi: 10.1080/14616740903237459.
[96]
E. Evans, ‘Diversity Matters: Intersectionality and Women’s Representation in the USA and UK’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 569–585, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsv063.
[97]
O. Ward, ‘Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns’, The International Journal of Press/Politics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 43–66, doi: 10.1177/1940161216673195.
[98]
M. L. Krook and M. K. Nugent, ‘Intersectional institutions: Representing women and ethnic minorities in the British Labour Party’, Party Politics, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 620–630, doi: 10.1177/1354068816655564.
[99]
A. Lijphart, Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt32bg23
[100]
M. Russell and P. Cowley, ‘“The Policy Power of the Westminster Parliament: The ‘Parliamentary State’ and the Empirical Evidence”’, Governance, pp. 121–137, doi: 10.1111/gove.12149.
[101]
D. Howarth, ‘“Westminster versus Whitehall: Two Incompatible Views of the Constitution”, UK Constitutional Law Association blog’, 10AD. [Online]. Available: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/04/10/david-howarth-westminster-versus-whitehall-two-incompatible-views-of-the-constitution/
[102]
K. Dowding, ‘“The Prime Ministerialisation of the British Prime Minister”’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 617–635, doi: 10.1093/pa/gss007.
[103]
R. Heffernan, ‘Prime Ministerial Predominance? Core Executive Politics in the UK’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 347–372, doi: 10.1111/1467-856X.00110.
[104]
R. Heffernan and P. Webb, ‘The British Prime Minister: Much More Than ‘First Among Equals’’, in The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, vol. Comparative politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 26–62.
[105]
Richard Heffernan and Paul Webb, ‘The British Prime Minister: Much More Than ‘First Among Equals’, in The presidentialization of politics: a comparative study of modern democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 26–62 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199252017.001.0001
[106]
Richard Heffernan, ‘Exploring (and Explaining) the British Prime Minister’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 605–620, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00203.x.
[107]
M. Bevir and R. A. W. Rhodes, ‘Prime Ministers, Presidentialism and Westminster Smokescreens’, Political Studies, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 671–690, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00632.x.
[108]
M. Bennister and R. Heffernan, ‘Cameron as Prime Minister: The Intra-Executive Politics of Britain’s Coalition Government’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 778–801, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsr061.
[109]
C. Byrne and K. Theakston, ‘Understanding the power of the prime minister: structure and agency in models of prime ministerial power’’, British Politics, pp. 1–18, doi: 10.1057/s41293-018-0087-7.
[110]
M. Foley, The British Presidency: Tony Blair and the Politics of Public Leadership. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2000.
[111]
M. Russell and P. Cowley, ‘Modes of UK Executive-Legislative Relations Revisited’, The Political Quarterly, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 18–28, doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12463.
[112]
M. Russell, D. Gover, K. Wollter, and M. Benton, ‘Actors, Motivations and Outcomes in the Legislative Process: Policy Influence at Westminster’, Government and Opposition, vol. 52, no. 01, pp. 1–27, doi: 10.1017/gov.2015.25.
[113]
Meg Russell, Bob Morris, and Phil Larkin, ‘Fitting the Bill: Bringing Commons Legislation Committees into Line with Best Practice’. UCL Constitution Unit report [Online]. Available: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/research/parliament/legislative-committees
[114]
M. Russell, ‘''Never Allow a Crisis Go To Waste: The Wright Committee Reforms to Strengthen the House of Commons"’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 612–633, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsr026.
[115]
M. Russell, ‘A Stronger Second Chamber? Assessing the Impact of House of Lords Reform in 1999 and the Lessons for Bicameralism’, Political Studies, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 866–885, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00810.x.
[116]
P. Dunleavy, ‘Audit 2017: How effective is the Westminster Parliament in scrutinising central government policy-making?’ : Democratic Audit UK’, 31AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.democraticaudit.com/2017/08/31/audit-2017-how-effective-is-the-westminster-parliament-in-scrutinising-central-government-policy-making/
[117]
F. Matthews, ‘Majoritarianism Reinterpreted: Effective Representation and the Quality of Westminster Democracy’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 50–72, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsx011.
[118]
S. Kalitowski, ‘Rubber Stamp or Cockpit? The Impact of Parliament on Government Legislation’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 694–708, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsn030.
[119]
Joni Lovenduski, ‘Prime Minister’s questions as political ritual’, British Politics, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 314–340, doi: 10.1057/bp.2012.13.
[120]
L. Thompson, ‘More of the Same or a Period of Change? The Impact of Bill Committees in the Twenty-First Century House of Commons’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 459–479, doi: 10.1093/pa/gss016.
[121]
L. Thompson, ‘Debunking the Myths of Bill Committees in the British House of Commons’, Politics, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 36–48, doi: 10.1111/1467-9256.12094.
[122]
F. Wolkenstein, ‘The Labour party, Momentum and the problem with intra-party democracy: Democratic Audit UK’, 31AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.democraticaudit.com/2016/10/31/the-labour-party-momentum-and-the-problem-with-intra-party-democracy/
[123]
S. B. Hobolt, ‘Brexit and the 2017 UK General Election’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 56, pp. 39–50, doi: 10.1111/jcms.12751.
[124]
L. Audickas, N. Dempsey, and R. Keen, ‘Membership of UK political parties - House of Commons Library report’. 3AD [Online]. Available: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN05125
[125]
T. Bale, P. Webb, and M. Poletti, ‘“Grassroots: Britain’s party members: who they are, what they think and what they do” - Mile End Institute report’. Mile End Institute: Queen Mary University of LOndon [Online]. Available: https://esrcpartymembersprojectorg.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/grassroots-pmp_final.pdf
[126]
R. T. Pettitt, ‘The “how” of election manifestos in the British Labour Party’’, Party Politics, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 289–295, doi: 10.1177/1354068816678889.
[127]
P. Dorey and A. Denham, ‘“The Longest Suicide Vote in History”: The Labour Party Leadership Election of 2015’, British Politics, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 259–282, 2016, doi: 10.1057/s41293-016-0001-0.
[128]
P. Seyd and P. Whiteley, ‘British Party Members: An Overview’, Party Politics, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 355–366, 2004, doi: 10.1177/1354068804043903.
[129]
D. Kavanagh, ‘Power in British political parties: Iron law or special pleading?’, West European Politics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 5–22, doi: 10.1080/01402388508424538.
[130]
R. S. Katz, ‘No man can serve two masters’, Party Politics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 183–193, doi: 10.1177/1354068813519967.
[131]
P. Norris, ‘May’s Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited’, Party Politics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 29–47, 1995, doi: 10.1177/1354068895001001002.
[132]
R. Lehrer, ‘Intra-Party Democracy and Party Responsiveness’, West European Politics, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1295–1319, doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.713747.
[133]
E. Shaw, ‘Mandatory reselection: lessons from Labour’s past’, 8AD. [Online]. Available: https://constitution-unit.com/2018/11/08/mandatory-reselection-lessons-from-labours-past/
[134]
D. Denver, ‘“Valence Politics’: How Britain Votes Now”’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 292–299, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00171.x.
[135]
H. Clarke, D. Sanders, M. Stewart, and P. Whiteley, ‘“Valence Politics and Electoral Choice in Britain, 2010”’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 237–253, doi: 10.1080/17457289.2011.562614.
[136]
Harold D. Clarke, et al, ‘Valence Politics’, in Political choice in Britain, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 1–16 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019924488X.001.0001
[137]
J. Green and S. B. Hobolt, ‘Owning the Issue Agenda: Party Strategies and Vote Choices in British Elections’, Electoral Studies, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 460–476, doi: 10.1016/j.electstud.2008.02.003.
[138]
G. Rabinowitz and S. E. Macdonald, ‘A Directional Theory of Issue Voting’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 83, no. 1, doi: 10.2307/1956436.
[139]
H. Brandenburg and R. Johns, ‘The Declining Representativeness of the British Party System, and Why It Matters’, Political Studies, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 704–725, doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12050.
[140]
K. Dommett, ‘Ideological Quietism? Ideology and Party Politics in Britain’, Political Studies, p. n/a-n/a, doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.12160.
[141]
Bernard Grofman, ‘Downs and Two-Party Convergence’, Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 7, pp. 25–46, 2004, doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104711.
[142]
J. Lees-Marshment, ‘The Marriage of Politics and Marketing’, Political Studies, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 692–713, doi: 10.1111/1467-9248.00337.
[143]
Jonathan Mellon, Geoffrey Evans, Edward Fieldhouse, Jane Green, and Christopher Prosser, ‘Brexit or Corbyn? Campaign and Inter-Election Vote Switching in the 2017 UK General Election’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 719–737, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsy001.
[144]
Ivor Crewe and Donald D. Searing, ‘Ideological Change in the British Conservative Party’, The American Political Science Review, vol. 82, no. 2, doi: 10.2307/1957391.
[145]
B. Jessop, ‘Margaret Thatcher and Thatcherism: Dead but not buried’, British Politics, vol. 10, no. S1, pp. 16–30, doi: 10.1057/bp.2014.22.
[146]
Steve Buckler and David Dolowitz, ‘Ideology Matters: Party Competition, Ideological Positioning and the Case of the Conservative Party under David Cameron’, The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 576–594, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00482.x.
[147]
Peter Kerr, Christopher Byrne, and Emma Foster, ‘Theorising Cameronism’, Political Studies Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 193–207, doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00232.x.
[148]
Richard Hayton, ‘Constructing a New Conservatism: Ideology and Values’, in David Cameron and Conservative renewal : the limits of modernisation?, G. Peele and J. Francis, Eds. Manchester University Press, 2016, pp. 41–57.
[149]
R. Hayton and L. McEnhill, ‘Cameron’s Conservative Party, social liberalism and social justice’, British Politics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 131–147, doi: 10.1057/bp.2015.19.
[150]
Timothy Heppell, ‘Cameron and Liberal Conservatism: Attitudes within the Parliamentary Conservative Party and Conservative Ministers’, The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 340–361, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00546.x.
[151]
Martin Smith and Rhonda Jones, ‘From big society to small state: Conservatism and the privatisation of government’, British Politics, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 226–248, doi: 10.1057/bp.2015.23. [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/1680869358/D80BEE46372341C0PQ/8?accountid=14511
[152]
Tim Bale, The Conservative Party: From Thatcher to Cameron, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2016.
[153]
P. Dorey and M. Garnett, ‘The weaker-willed, the craven-hearted : the decline of One Nation Conservatism’, Global discourse, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 69–91, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2014.914823
[154]
A. Heath, ‘Theresa May’s speech shows that free-market ideas are in decline - Daily Telegraph’, 5AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/10/05/no-prime-minister-the-government-doesnt-always-know-whats-best/
[155]
M. Hall, ‘Theresa May promises bright future for all in conference speech - Daily Express’, 6AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/718107/Theresa-May-promises-bright-future-for-all
[156]
S. Kriss, ‘Theresa May’s Conference Speech Gave a Monstrous Ideology a Human Face, Vice UK’, 5AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/theresa-may-conference-speech-2016
[157]
‘Theresa May’s speech to the Conservative Party Conference, 5 October 2016’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37563510
[158]
A. Vincent, ‘New Ideologies for Old?’, The Political Quarterly, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 48–58, doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.00136.
[159]
Michael Freeden, ‘The Ideology of New Labour’, The Political Quarterly, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 42–51, doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.00203.
[160]
R. Heffernan, ‘“Labour’s New Labour Legacy: Politics after Blair and Brown”’, Political Studies Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 163–177, doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00230.x.
[161]
J. Atkins, ‘Narrating One Nation: The Ideology and Rhetoric of the Miliband Labour Party’, Politics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 19–31, doi: 10.1111/1467-9256.12076.
[162]
Peter Dorey and Andrew Denham, ‘The Longest Suicide Vote in History: The Labour Party Leadership Election of 2015’, British Politics, vol. Volume 11, no. 3, pp. 259–282, doi: 10.1057/s41293-016-0001-0.
[163]
Ben Jackson, ‘Labour’s ideology: towards common ground’, Renewal - A Journal of Social Democracy, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 5–10, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://renewal.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/jackson_23.4_final-1.pdf
[164]
Nadia Khomami, ‘What does Jeremy Corbyn think? - The Guardian’, 12AD. [Online]. Available: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/12/what-does-jeremy-corbyn-think
[165]
Tom Quinn, ‘What did Corbyn say in his Conference speech? - Prospect Magazine’, 28AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/what-did-corbyn-say-in-his-conference-speech
[166]
M. Wilkinson, ‘Jeremy Corbyn pledges socialism for 21st century as he plans business tax hike and benefits free-for-all.’, 28AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/28/jeremy-corbyn-immigration-labour-conference-speech-live/
[167]
‘Jeremy Corbyn’s speech to the Labour Party conference, 28 September 2016’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37500290
[168]
‘The Conservative Party’. .
[169]
‘Labour Party’. [Online]. Available: http://www.labour.org.uk/
[170]
‘The Liberal Democrats’. .
[171]
‘SNP (Scottish National Party)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.snp.org/
[172]
‘UKIP (the United Kingdom Independence Party)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.ukip.org/
[173]
‘UK Polling Report’. .
[174]
Ros Taylor, ‘How well does the UK’s media system support democratic politics and represent citizens’ interests? - Democratic Audit UK’, 30AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.democraticaudit.com/2018/08/30/2018audit-how-well-does-the-uks-media-system-support-democratic-politics-and-represent-citizens-interests/
[175]
A. Chadwick, C. Vaccari, and B. O’Loughlin, ‘Do tabloids poison the well of social media? Explaining democratically dysfunctional news sharing’’, New Media & Society, doi: 10.1177/1461444818769689.
[176]
Stephen Ward and Dominic Wring, ‘Out with the Old, In with the New? The Media Campaign’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 71, no. suppl_1, pp. 203–221, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsx057.
[177]
Tony Blair and others, ‘Tony Blair’s Reuters Speech on the Media and responses’, Political Quarterly, vol. Volume 78, no. 4, pp. 471–498 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2007.00877.x
[178]
‘The Political Quarterly : Vol 78 , No 4’, The Political Quarterly, vol. 78, no. 4 [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/1467923x/2007/78/4
[179]
Ken Newton, ‘Public Service and Commercial Broadcasting: Impacts on Politics and Society’, The Political Quarterly, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 31–38, doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12214.
[180]
S. Barnett and J. Seaton, ‘Why the BBC Matters: Memo to the New Parliament about a Unique British Institution’, The Political Quarterly, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 327–332, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2010.02117.x.
[181]
K. Newton, ‘May the Weak Force Be with You: The Power of the Mass Media in Modern Politics’, European Journal of Political Research, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 209–234, doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00296.x.
[182]
S. Ringen, ‘Why the British Press Is Brilliant’, British Journalism Review, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 31–37, Sep. 2003, doi: 10.1177/09564748030143007.
[183]
Paul Baker, Costas Gabrielatos, and Tony McEnery, ‘Sketching Muslims: A Corpus Driven Analysis of Representations Around the Word “Muslim” in the British Press 1998–2009’, Applied Linguistics, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 255–278, doi: 10.1093/applin/ams048.
[184]
V. Narayanan, P. N. Howard, B. Kollanyi, and M. Elswah, ‘Russian Involvement and Junk News during Brexit – Oxford Internet Institute’, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://blogs.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/93/2017/12/Russia-and-Brexit-v27.pdf
[185]
Monica Kaminska, John D. Gallacher, Bence Kollanyi, Taha Yasseri, and Philip N. Howard, ‘Social Media and News Sources during the 2017 UK General Election – Oxford Internet Institute’, 6AD. [Online]. Available: http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/social-media-and-news-sources-during-the-2017-uk-general-election/
[186]
Stephen Ward and Dominic Wring, ‘Out with the Old, In with the New? The Media Campaign’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 71, no. suppl_1, pp. 203–221, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsx057.
[187]
K. Dommett and L. Temple, ‘Digital Campaigning: The Rise of Facebook and Satellite Campaigns’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 71, no. suppl_1, pp. 189–202, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsx056.
[188]
Elizabeth Dubois and Grant Blank, ‘The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media’, Information, Communication & Society, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 729–745, doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656.
[189]
R. Breeze, ‘'"Enemies of the people”: Populist performances in the Daily Mail reporting of the Article 50 case’’, Discourse, Context & Media, vol. 25, pp. 60–67, doi: 10.1016/j.dcm.2018.03.008.
[190]
Julianne Kerr Morrison, Ravi Naik, and Stephanie Hankey, ‘Data and Democracy in the Digital Age, The Constitution Society’. 10AD [Online]. Available: https://consoc.org.uk/publications/data-and-democracy-in-the-digital-age/
[191]
‘House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, “Disinformation and ‘Fake News’: Final Report”, Eighth Report of Session 2017-19’. 14AD [Online]. Available: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/1791/1791.pdf
[192]
Colm O’Cinneide, ‘Human rights and the UK constitution, British Academy’. British Academy, London, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.britac.ac.uk/policy/Human-rights.cfm
[193]
Mark Bevir, ‘The Westminster Model, Governance and Judicial Reform’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 559–577, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsn025.
[194]
R. Masterman, ‘“Labour’s ‘Juridification’ of the Constitution”’, Parliamentary Affairs, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 476–492, doi: 10.1093/pa/gsp013.
[195]
Anthony King, ‘The Judges Come Out’, in The British Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 115–149.
[196]
Anthony King, ‘The Judges Come Out’, in The British constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 116–150 [Online]. Available: https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576982.001.0001/acprof-9780199576982-chapter-6
[197]
Colm O’Cinneide, ‘Human Rights and the UK Constitution’, in The Changing Constitution, 8th ed., Oxford University Press, 2015, pp. 67–103.
[198]
‘Ministry of Justice, “Responding to Human Rights judgments: Report to the Joint Committee on Human Rights on the Government’s response to Human Rights judgments 2017–18”, November 2018’. [Online]. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/756346/responding-human-rights-judgments-2017-18.pdf
[199]
K. D. Ewing, ‘The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy’, Modern Law Review, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 79–99, doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00192.
[200]
K. D. Ewing and J.-C. Tham, ‘The Continuing Futility of the Human Rights Act’, Public Law, pp. 668–693, 2008 [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joo-Cheong_Tham/publication/237405461_The_Continuing_Futility_of_the_Human_Rights_Act/links/02e7e52de10a605042000000.pdf
[201]
K.D. Ewing, ‘The Resilience of the Political Constitution’, German Law Journal, vol. 14, pp. 2111–2136, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/germlajo14&div=111&g_sent=1&collection=journals
[202]
Aileen Kavanagh, ‘“What’s so Weak About ‘Weak-Form Review’? The Case of the UK Human Rights Act 1998”’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015, doi: https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/13/4/1008/2450828.
[203]
Stephen Gardbaum, ‘What’s so weak about "weak-form review”? A reply to Aileen Kavanagh’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1040–1048, doi: 10.1093/icon/mov063.
[204]
Adrian Vermeule, ‘The Atrophy of Constitutional Powers’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 421–444, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqs010.
[205]
Neil Johnston, ‘Prisoners’ voting rights: developments since May 2015 - House of Commons Library briefing paper CBP-7461’. 11AD [Online]. Available: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7461
[206]
E. Adams, ‘'Prisoners’ Voting Rights: Case Closed?’, UK Constitutional Law Association blog’, 30AD. [Online]. Available: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/01/30/elizabeth-adams-prisoners-voting-rights-case-closed/
[207]
Vernon Bogdanor, ‘Brexit and our unprotected constitution - The Constitution Society’. [Online]. Available: https://consoc.org.uk/publications/brexit-unprotected-british-constitution/
[208]
Young, Alison L., ‘The Constitutional Implications of Brexit’, European Public Law, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 757–786, 2017 [Online]. Available: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EURO2017043
[209]
Michael Blauberger and Susanne K. Schmidt, ‘The European Court of Justice and its political impact’, West European Politics, vol. 40, no. 4, pp. 907–918, doi: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1281652.
[210]
Michael Blauberger et al., ‘ECJ Judges Read the Morning Papers. Explaining the Turnaround of European Citizenship Jurisprudence’’, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1–41, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3123003.
[211]
A. Donald, J. Gordon, and P. Leach, ‘The UK and the European Court of Human Rights – Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report 83’. 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/documents/research/83._european_court_of_human_rights.pdf
[212]
R. Hazell and M. Sandford, ‘English Question or Union Question? Neither Has Easy Answers’, The Political Quarterly, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 16–23, doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12132.
[213]
J. Sheldon, ‘Intergovernmental relations and the English question: options for reform. Constitution Unit Blog’, 16AD. [Online]. Available: https://constitution-unit.com/2018/08/16/intergovernmental-relations-and-the-english-question-options-for-reform/
[214]
D. Torrance, ‘Intergovernmental relations in the United Kingdom, House of Commons Library briefing’. 24AD [Online]. Available: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8371
[215]
‘House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Devolution and Exiting the EU: Reconciling Differences and Building Strong Relationships, Eighth Report of Session 2017-19’. 31AD [Online]. Available: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmpubadm/1485/1485.pdf
[216]
Anthony King, ‘John Bull’s Other Lands’, in The British Constitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007, pp. 179–214 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576982.001.0001
[217]
A. King, The British constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576982.001.0001
[218]
J. Curtice, ‘A Stronger or Weaker Union? Public Reactions to Asymmetric Devolution in the United Kingdom’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 95–113, doi: 10.1093/publius/pjj006.
[219]
Nicola McEwen, ‘Still better together? Purpose and power in intergovernmental councils in the UK’, Regional & Federal Studies, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 667–690, doi: 10.1080/13597566.2017.1389724.
[220]
C. Jeffery, ‘As devolution has progressed the centre has failed to imagine a new rationale for the union, UCL Constitution Unit Blog’, 6AD. [Online]. Available: https://constitution-unit.com/2015/10/06/as-devolution-has-progressed-the-centre-has-failed-to-imagine-a-new-rationale-for-the-union/
[221]
‘The Political Quarterly’, vol. 86, no. 2 [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/poqu.2015.86.issue-2/issuetoc
[222]
A. Trench, ‘Devolution in the Round: Can Britain Continue to Muddle through?’, Political Insight, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 4–7, doi: 10.1111/2041-9066.12066.
[223]
‘The Smith Commission’, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20151202171017/http://www.smith-commission.scot/
[224]
‘House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Devolution and Exiting the EU: Reconciling Differences and Building Strong Relationships, Eighth Report of Session 2017-19’. 31AD [Online]. Available: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmpubadm/1485/1485.pdf
[225]
Meg Russell and Jack Sheldon, ‘Options for an English Parliament - UCL Constitution Unit report’. 2018 [Online]. Available: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/research/parliament/english-parliament
[226]
‘Campaign for an English Parliament’. [Online]. Available: http://thecep.org.uk/
[227]
John Denham, ‘A nation divided? The identities, politics and governance of England, openDemocracy UK blog’, 16AD. [Online]. Available: https://www.opendemocracy.net/uk/john-denham/nation-divided-identities-politics-and-governance-of-england
[228]
R. Hazell, The English Question, vol. Devolution series. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2006.
[229]
Richard Kelly, ‘English votes for English laws - House of Commons Library briefing’, 20AD [Online]. Available: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7339
[230]
Daniel Gover and Michael Kenny, ‘One year of EVEL: evaluating “English votes for English laws” in the House of Commons - The UCL Constitution Unit Blog’, 28AD. [Online]. Available: https://constitution-unit.com/2016/11/28/one-year-of-evel-evaluating-english-votes-for-english-laws-in-the-house-of-commons/
[231]
Vaughne Miller, ‘How much legislation comes from Europe? – House of Commons Library Research Briefing’. 13AD [Online]. Available: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/RP10-62
[232]
Simon Bulmer and Martin Burch, ‘The Europeanization of UK Government: from Quiet Revolution to Explicit Step-Change?’, Public Administration, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 861–890, doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00481.x.
[233]
John Curtice and Sarah Tipping, ‘A more informed public? The impact of the Brexit debate’, in British Social Attitudes, no. 35, NatCen Social Research, 2018, pp. 1–33 [Online]. Available: http://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/latest-report/british-social-attitudes-35/europe.aspx?_ga=2.213850324.1750374658.1538224605-1637657831.1537625703
[234]
HMG, Review of the Balance of Competences. Foreign & Commonwealth Office, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/review-of-the-balance-of-competences
[235]
Mark Elliott, ‘United Kingdom: Parliamentary Sovereignty under Pressure’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 545–555, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/injcl2&div=30&g_sent=1&collection=journals#
[236]
John Curtice, ‘Euroscepticism’, in British Social Attitudes 33, vol. 33, NatCen Social Research, 2016, pp. 1–19 [Online]. Available: http://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/latest-report/british-social-attitudes-33/euroscepticism.aspx
[237]
John Curtice and Sarah Tipping, ‘A more informed public? The impact of the Brexit debate’, in British Social Attitudes, no. 35, NatCen Social Research, 2018, pp. 1–33 [Online]. Available: http://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/latest-report/british-social-attitudes-35/europe.aspx?_ga=2.213850324.1750374658.1538224605-1637657831.1537625703
[238]
‘Eurobarometer - European Commission’. [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/General/index
[239]
Lord Ashcroft, ‘You Should Hear What They Say about You, Lord Ashcroft polling report’. [Online]. Available: https://lordashcroftpolls.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/LORD-ASHCROFT-POLLS-You-Should-Hear-What-They-Say-About-You-EU28-Poll-Report-Feb-2016.pdf
[240]
J. Buller, ‘Britain as an Awkward Partner: Reassessing Britain’s Relations with the EU’, Politics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 33–42, Feb. 1995 [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9256.1995.tb00018.x
[241]
Stephen George, ‘A Reply to Buller’, Politics, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 43–47 [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9256.1995.tb00019.x
[242]
S. Wilks, ‘Britain and Europe: An Awkward Partner or an Awkward State?’, Politics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 159–165 [Online]. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9256.1996.tb00035.x
[243]
Oliver Daddow and Tim Oliver, ‘A not so awkward partner: the UK has been a champion of many causes in the EU, LSE Brexit blog’, 15AD. [Online]. Available: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2016/04/15/a-not-so-awkward-partner-the-uk-has-been-a-champion-of-many-causes-in-the-eu/
[244]
Vivien A. Schmidt, ‘Procedural democracy in the EU: the Europeanization of national and sectoral policy-making processes’’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 670–691, doi: 10.1080/13501760600808444.
[245]
Oliver Daddow, ‘The UK media and “Europe”: from permissive consensus to destructive dissent’, International Affairs, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 1219–1236, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01129.x.
[246]
Nicholas Startin, ‘Have we reached a tipping point? The mainstreaming of Euroscepticism in the UK’, International Political Science Review, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 311–323, doi: 10.1177/0192512115574126.
[247]
Lori Thorlakson, ‘Britain’s Place in the European Union’, in Developments in British Politics, vol. 9, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011, pp. 257–279.
[248]
Vernon Bogdanor, ‘Europe and the Sovereignty of the People’, The Political Quarterly, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 348–351, doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12297.
[249]
Deborah Mabbett, ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty and Brexit’, The Political Quarterly, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 167–169, doi: 10.1111/1467-923X.12364.
[250]
Keith Ewing, ‘Brexit and Parliamentary Sovereignty’, The Modern Law Review, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 711–726, doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.12281.
[251]
J. Owen, L. Lloyd, and J. Rutter, ‘Preparing Brexit: How ready is Whitehall? - Institute for Government report’, 10AD [Online]. Available: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/preparing-brexit-how-ready-whitehall
[252]
Joe Owen, Tim Durrant, Lewis Lloyd, and Jill Rutter, ‘Brexit: six months to go - Institute for Government report’, 17AD [Online]. Available: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/brexit-six-months-go
[253]
John Curtice, ‘Do voters still want to leave the EU? How they view the Brexit process two years on - UK in a changing Europe report’, 7AD. [Online]. Available: http://ukandeu.ac.uk/research-papers/do-voters-still-want-to-leave-the-eu-how-they-view-the-brexit-process-two-years-on/
[254]
Matthew Bevington, Jack Simson Caird, and Alan Wager, ‘The Brexit Endgame: A Short Guide - UK in a Changing Europe report’. Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law, 29AD [Online]. Available: http://ukandeu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Brexit-endgame-a-short-guide.pdf
[255]
‘House of Commons Exiting the EU Committee, “Parliamentary Scrutiny and Approval of the Withdrawal Agreement and Negotiations on a Future Relationship”, Sixth Report of Session 2017-19’. 28AD [Online]. Available: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmexeu/1240/1240.pdf
[256]
‘Constitution Unit Blog - Brexit theme’. [Online]. Available: https://constitution-unit.com/category/europe/
[257]
Alan Renwick and Meg Russell, ‘Monitor 64: Brexit and the transformation of British politics. UCL Constitution Unit Blog’, 24AD. [Online]. Available: https://constitution-unit.com/2016/10/24/monitor-64-brexit-and-the-transformation-of-british-politics/
[258]
Alan Renwick, ‘The process of Brexit: what comes next? UCL Constitution Unit Blog’, 8AD. [Online]. Available: https://constitution-unit.com/2017/02/08/the-process-of-brexit-what-comes-next/
[259]
Philip Lynch and Richard Whitaker, ‘Divided but influential? The Exiting the European Union select committee. UCL Constitution Unit Blog’, 10AD. [Online]. Available: https://constitution-unit.com/2018/05/10/divided-but-influential-the-exiting-the-european-union-select-committee/
[260]
Nicola McEwen, ‘Crisis, headache, or sideshow: how should the UK government respond to the Scottish parliament’s decision to withhold consent for the Withdrawal Bill? UCL Constitution Unit Blog’, 30AD. [Online]. Available: https://constitution-unit.com/2018/05/30/crisis-headache-or-sideshow-how-should-the-uk-government-respond-to-the-scottish-parliaments-decision-to-withhold-consent-for-the-withdrawal-bill/
[261]
Mark Elliott, Jack Williams, and Alison Young, ‘The executive’s Brexit: the UK Constitution after Miller. UCL Constitution Unit Blog’, 21AD. [Online]. Available: https://constitution-unit.com/2018/08/21/the-executives-brexit-the-uk-constitution-after-miller/#more-6958
[262]
D. Wincott, ‘Brexit and the territorial constitution: déjà vu all over again? UCL Constitution Unit Blog’, 11AD. [Online]. Available: https://constitution-unit.com/2018/09/11/brexit-and-the-territorial-constitution-deja-vu-all-over-again/
[263]
Jess Sargeant, Alan Renwick, and Meg Russell, ‘The Mechanics of a Further Referendum on Brexit. UCL Constitution Unit report’. [Online]. Available: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/research/electionsandreferendums/The_Mechanics_of_a_Further_Referendum_on_Brexit
[264]
Vernon Bogdanor, Dominic Grieve, Joe Owen, and Tony Travers, ‘Brexit: the impact on government and parliament - seminar at the LSE’, 23AD. [Online]. Available: http://www.lse.ac.uk/european-institute/events/2018-19/Impact-on-Government/Brexit-the-impact-on-government-and-parliament
