1.
Course Overview.
2.
Garnett M, Lynch P. Exploring British politics. Fourth edition. London: Routledge; 2016.
3.
Jones B, Norton P. Politics UK. 8th ed. London: Routledge; 2014.
4.
Leach R, Coxall B, Robins L. British Politics. 2nd ed. Palgrave foundations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
5.
Kingdom J, Fairclough P. Government and Politics in Britain. 4th ed. Cambridge: Polity; 2014.
6.
Moran M. Politics and Governance in the UK. 3rd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015.
7.
Bogdanor, Vernon. The New British Constitution. Oxford: Hart; 2009.
8.
Anthony King. Who Governs Britain? Pelican; 2015.
9.
King AS. The British constitution [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576982.001.0001
10.
Heffernan R, Hay C, Russell M, Cowley P, editors. Developments in British Politics 10. 10th edition. London: Palgrave; 2016.
11.
Cowley P, Ford R, editors. Sex, Lies, and the Ballot Box: 50 Things You Need to Know about British Elections [Internet]. London: Biteback Publishing; 2014. Available from: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1824617
12.
Evans G, Menon A. Brexit and British politics. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2017.
13.
The Political Quarterly [Internet]. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291467-923X
14.
Parliamentary Affairs.
15.
British Politics [Internet]. Available from: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/bp/archive/index.html
16.
Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties [Internet]. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fbep20#.VkoDULH2qhh
17.
Political Insight [Internet]. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)2041-9066
18.
UK Parliament – Homepage.
19.
UK Parliament – Research Briefings [Internet]. Available from: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/
20.
How Government Works – gov.uk [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/how-government-works
21.
Prime Minister’s Office, 10 Downing Street – gov.uk [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/prime-ministers-office-10-downing-street
22.
Palgrave Macmillan - Politics and Governance in the UK - Michael Moran [Internet]. Available from: https://www.macmillanihe.com/companion/Moran-Politics-And-Governance-In-The-Uk-3e/
23.
Constitution Unit.
24.
The Constitution Unit Blog [Internet]. Available from: http://constitution-unit.com/
25.
LSE British Politics and Policy blog [Internet]. Available from: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/
26.
UK Constitutional Law Association blog [Internet]. Available from: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/
27.
Democratic Audit UK blog [Internet]. Available from: http://www.democraticaudit.com/
28.
Open Democracy UK [Internet]. Available from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/opendemocracyuk/
29.
BBC News [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news
30.
Sky News [Internet]. Available from: http://news.sky.com/
31.
Channel 4 News [Internet]. Available from: http://www.channel4.com/news/
32.
The Guardian [Internet]. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/uk
33.
The Times [Internet]. Available from: http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/
34.
Daily Telegraph [Internet]. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/
35.
Financial Times [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ft.com/home/uk
36.
Daily Mail [Internet]. Available from: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html
37.
Daily Express [Internet]. Available from: http://www.express.co.uk/
38.
The Sun [Internet]. Available from: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/
39.
Daily Mirror [Internet]. Available from: http://www.mirror.co.uk/
40.
The Huffington Post UK [Internet]. Available from: http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/
41.
politics.co.uk [Internet]. Available from: http://www.politics.co.uk/
42.
Politico UK [Internet]. Available from: https://www.politico.eu/country/united-kingdom/
43.
Evans G, Tilley J. The new politics of class: the political exclusion of the British working class [Internet]. First edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. Available from: https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755753.001.0001/acprof-9780198755753
44.
Curtice J. ‘Why Leave Won the UK’s EU Referendum’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 55:19–37. doi:10.1111/jcms.12613
45.
Ford R, Goodwin M. Britain After Brexit A Nation Divided. Journal of Democracy. 2017;28(1):17–30. doi:10.1353/jod.2017.0002
46.
Sara B. Hobolt. The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent’. Journal of European Public Policy. 23(9):1259–77. doi:10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785
47.
Ailsa Henderson, Charlie Jeffery, Dan Wincott, Richard Wyn Jones. How Brexit was made in England. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 19(4):631–46. doi:10.1177/1369148117730542
48.
Sascha O Becker, Thiemo Fetzer, Dennis Novy. Who voted for Brexit? A comprehensive district-level analysis. Economic Policy. 32(92):601–50. doi:10.1093/epolic/eix012
49.
Ashcroft, Lord. How the United Kingdom voted on Thursday... and why - Lord Ashcroft Polls [Internet]. 24 AD. Available from: https://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/how-the-united-kingdom-voted-and-why/#more-14746
50.
Harold D. Clarke, Matthew Goodwin, Paul Whiteley. Why Britain Voted for Brexit: An Individual-Level Analysis of the 2016 Referendum Vote. Parliamentary Affairs. 70(3):439–64. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx005
51.
Goodwin M, Milazzo C. Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 19(3):450–64. doi:10.1177/1369148117710799
52.
Richard Ashcroft, Mark Bevir. Pluralism, National Identity and Citizenship: Britain after Brexit. The Political Quarterly. 87(3):355–9. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12293
53.
Virdee S, McGeever B. Racism, Crisis, Brexit. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 41(10):1802–19. doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1361544
54.
Neil Lee, Katy Morris, Thomas Kemeny. Immobility and the Brexit vote. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. 11(1):143–63. doi:10.1093/cjres/rsx027
55.
Lorenza Antonucci, Laszlo Horvath, Yordan Kutiyski, André Krouwel. The malaise of the squeezed middle: Challenging the narrative of the ‘left behind’ Brexiter. Competition & Change. 21(3):211–29. doi:10.1177/1024529417704135
56.
Kaufmann E. ‘It’s NOT the economy, stupid: Brexit as a story of personal values’, LSE British Politics and Policy blog [Internet]. 7 AD. Available from: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/personal-values-brexit-vote/
57.
Jackson D, Thorsen E, Wring D, editors. EU Referendum Analysis 2016: Media, Voters and the Campaign [Internet]. CSJCC (Bournemouth University), CRCC (Loughborough University), and Political Studies Association. Available from: http://www.referendumanalysis.eu/
58.
Beetham D. What is Britishness? Citizenship, Values and Identity, Red Pepper [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.redpepper.org.uk/what-is-britishness-citizenship/
59.
Colley L. Britishness in the 21st Century [Internet]. 8 AD. Available from: https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20040809182858/http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/Page3049.asp
60.
Krishan Kumar. Nation and Empire: English and British National Identity in Comparative Perspective. Theory and Society [Internet]. 2000;29(5):575–608. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3108547
61.
Atkins J. (Re)imagining Magna Carta: Myth, Metaphor and the Rhetoric of Britishness. Parliamentary Affairs. 69(3):603–20. doi:10.1093/pa/gsv057
62.
Kenny M, Gifford C, Vines E, Wellings B. Roundtable on English Nationalism and Euroscepticism, British Politics, September 2015. British Politics [Internet]. 10(3). Available from: http://link.springer.com/journal/41293/10/3/page/1
63.
Clarke HD, Kaufmann E, Reeves R, Savage M, Tilley J, Evans G. Symposium: James Tilley and Geoffrey Evans, The New Politics of Class. The Political Quarterly [Internet]. 2017;88(4). Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/1467923x/2017/88/4
64.
Devine F. Class. In: The Oxford Handbook of British Politics [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199230952.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199230952 doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199230952.003.0033
65.
Harmer E, Southern R. More Stable than Strong: Women’s Representation, Voters and Issues. Parliamentary Affairs. 71(suppl_1):237–54. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx072
66.
Sobolewska M. Party Strategies and the Descriptive Representation of Ethnic Minorities: The 2010 British General Election. West European Politics. 36(3):615–33. doi:10.1080/01402382.2013.773729
67.
MacKay F. Gender. In: The Oxford Handbook of British Politics [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 646–62. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199230952.001.0001 doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199230952.003.0035
68.
Catalano A. ‘Women Acting for Women?  An Analysis of Gender and Debate Participation in the British House of Commons, 2005–2007’. Politics & Gender [Internet]. 5(1):45–68. Available from: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=4495300&jid=PAG&volumeId=5&issueId=01&aid=4495292
69.
Smith JC. Politics and Parenthood: An Examination of UK Party Leadership Elections. Parliamentary Affairs. 71(1):196–217. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx016
70.
Ross K, Evans E, Harrison L, Shears M, Wadia K. The Gender of News and News of Gender: A Study of Sex, Politics, and Press Coverage of the 2010 British General Election. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 18(1):3–20. doi:10.1177/1940161212457814
71.
Emily Harmer. Men Writing about Men: Media and the UK General Election 2015 [Internet]. Centre for Research in Communication and Culture. Loughborough University; 22 AD. Available from: https://blog.lboro.ac.uk/crcc/general-election/men-writing-about-men-media-and-the-uk-general-election-2015/
72.
UK Election Analysis 2017: Media, Voters and the Campaign [Internet]. Centre for Politics and Media Research. Bournemouth University. Available from: http://www.electionanalysis.uk/
73.
Higgins M, McKay FM. Gender and the Development of a Political Persona: The Case of Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon. British Politics. 2015;283–300. doi:10.1057/bp.2015.44
74.
Intimidation in Public Life: A Review by the Committee on Standards in Public Life [Internet]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/666927/6.3637_CO_v6_061217_Web3.1__2_.pdf
75.
World Economic Forum, Global Gender Gap Report 2017 [Internet]. World Economic Forum; 2017. Available from: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-gender-gap-report-2017
76.
Ben Clements, Clive D. Field. Public Opinion toward Homosexuality and Gay Rights in Great Britain. Public Opinion Quarterly. 78(2):523–47. doi:10.1093/poq/nfu018
77.
Clements B. Partisan Attachments and Attitudes towards Same-Sex Marriage in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs. 2014 Jan 1;67(1):232–44. doi:10.1093/pa/gst003
78.
Chaney P. ‘Institutionally Homophobic? Political Parties and the Substantive Representation of LGBT People: Westminster and Regional UK Elections 1945–2011’. Policy & Politics. 41(1):101–21. doi:10.1332/030557312X645793
79.
Evans J, Tonge J. Partisan and religious drivers of moral conservatism: Same-sex marriage and abortion in Northern Ireland. Party Politics. 13 AD;24(4):335–46. doi:10.1177/1354068816656665
80.
Ford R. Is Racial Prejudice Declining in Britain? The British Journal of Sociology. 59(4):609–36. doi:10.1111/j.1468-4446.2008.00212.x
81.
Magne Flemmen, Mike Savage. The politics of nationalism and white racism in the UK. The British Journal of Sociology [Internet]. 2017;68(S1):S233–64. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-4446.12311
82.
Thrasher M, Borisyuk G, Rallings C, Webber R. Candidate Ethnic Origins and Voter Preferences: Examining Name Discrimination in Local Elections in Britain. British Journal of Political Science. 47(02):413–35. doi:10.1017/S0007123415000125
83.
Meer N. The Politics of Voluntary and Involuntary Identities: Are Muslims in Britain an Ethnic, Racial or Religious Minority? Patterns of Prejudice. 42(1):61–81. doi:10.1080/00313220701805901
84.
Parveen Akhtar, Timothy Peace. Ethnic minorities in British politics: candidate selection and clan politics in the Labour Party. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies. 1–17. doi:10.1080/1369183X.2018.1443804
85.
Heath AF, Fisher SD, Sanders D, Sobolewska M. Ethnic Heterogeneity in the Social Bases of Voting at the 2010 British General Election. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 21(2):255–77. doi:10.1080/17457289.2011.562611
86.
Saalfeld T, Bischof DB. Minority-Ethnic MPs and the Substantive Representation of Minority Interests in the House of Commons, 2005-2011. Parliamentary Affairs. 66(2):305–28. doi:10.1093/pa/gss084
87.
Meer N, Modood T. The Multicultural State We’re In: Muslims, ‘Multiculture’ and the ‘Civic Re-balancing’ of British Multiculturalism. Political Studies. 57(3):473–97. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00745.x
88.
David Sanders, Stephen D. Fisher, Anthony Heath, Maria Sobolewska. The democratic engagement of Britain’s ethnic minorities. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 37(1):120–39. doi:10.1080/01419870.2013.827795
89.
Shulman S. Challenging the Civic/Ethnic and West/East Dichotomies in the Study of Nationalism. Comparative Political Studies. 35(5):554–85. doi:10.1177/0010414002035005003
90.
Taylor-Gooby P, Waite E. Toward a More Pragmatic Multiculturalism? How the U.K. Policy Community Sees the Future of Ethnic Diversity Policies. Governance. 27(2):267–89. doi:10.1111/gove.12030
91.
Hirsch A. Brit(ish): on race, identity and belonging. London: Jonathan Cape; 2018.
92.
David Olusoga. The reality of being black in today’s Britain’, Guardian. Guardian [Internet]. 29 AD. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/30/what-it-means-to-be-black-in-britain-today
93.
Olusoga D. Black and British: a forgotten history. London: Macmillan; 2016.
94.
Crouch J, Minhas P. Multicultural Britain in the 21st Century - Opinium research [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://www.opinium.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Multicultural-Britain-2017-v6.pdf
95.
Squires J. Intersecting Inequalities: Britain’s Equality Review. International Feminist Journal of Politics. 11(4):496–512. doi:10.1080/14616740903237459
96.
Evans E. Diversity Matters: Intersectionality and Women’s Representation in the USA and UK. Parliamentary Affairs. 2016 Jul;69(3):569–85. doi:10.1093/pa/gsv063
97.
Ward O. Intersectionality and Press Coverage of Political Campaigns. The International Journal of Press/Politics. 22(1):43–66. doi:10.1177/1940161216673195
98.
Krook ML, Nugent MK. Intersectional institutions: Representing women and ethnic minorities in the British Labour Party. Party Politics. 22(5):620–30. doi:10.1177/1354068816655564
99.
Lijphart A. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries [Internet]. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2012. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/j.ctt32bg23
100.
Russell M, Cowley P. ‘The Policy Power of the Westminster Parliament: The “Parliamentary State” and the Empirical Evidence’. Governance. 121–37. doi:10.1111/gove.12149
101.
Howarth D. ‘Westminster versus Whitehall: Two Incompatible Views of the Constitution’, UK Constitutional Law Association blog [Internet]. 10 AD. Available from: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/04/10/david-howarth-westminster-versus-whitehall-two-incompatible-views-of-the-constitution/
102.
Dowding K. ‘The Prime Ministerialisation of the British Prime Minister’. Parliamentary Affairs. 66(3):617–35. doi:10.1093/pa/gss007
103.
Heffernan R. Prime Ministerial Predominance? Core Executive Politics in the UK. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 5(3):347–72. doi:10.1111/1467-856X.00110
104.
Heffernan R, Webb P. The British Prime Minister: Much More Than ‘First Among Equals’. In: The Presidentialization of Politics: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 26–62.
105.
Richard Heffernan, Paul Webb. The British Prime Minister: Much More Than ‘First Among Equals. In: The presidentialization of politics: a comparative study of modern democracies [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005. p. 26–62. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199252017.001.0001 doi:DOI:10.1093/0199252017.003.0002
106.
Richard Heffernan. Exploring (and Explaining) the British Prime Minister. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 7(4):605–20. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00203.x
107.
Bevir M, Rhodes RAW. Prime Ministers, Presidentialism and Westminster Smokescreens. Political Studies. 54(4):671–90. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00632.x
108.
Bennister M, Heffernan R. Cameron as Prime Minister: The Intra-Executive Politics of Britain’s Coalition Government. Parliamentary Affairs. 65(4):778–801. doi:10.1093/pa/gsr061
109.
Byrne C, Theakston K. Understanding the power of the prime minister: structure and agency in models of prime ministerial power’. British Politics. 1–18. doi:10.1057/s41293-018-0087-7
110.
Foley M. The British Presidency: Tony Blair and the Politics of Public Leadership. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2000.
111.
Russell M, Cowley P. Modes of UK Executive-Legislative Relations Revisited. The Political Quarterly. 89(1):18–28. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12463
112.
Russell M, Gover D, Wollter K, Benton M. Actors, Motivations and Outcomes in the Legislative Process: Policy Influence at Westminster. Government and Opposition. 52(01):1–27. doi:10.1017/gov.2015.25
113.
Meg Russell, Bob Morris, Phil Larkin. Fitting the Bill: Bringing Commons Legislation Committees into Line with Best Practice [Internet]. UCL Constitution Unit report. Available from: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/research/parliament/legislative-committees
114.
Russell M. ''Never Allow a Crisis Go To Waste: The Wright Committee Reforms to Strengthen the House of Commons". Parliamentary Affairs. 64(4):612–33. doi:10.1093/pa/gsr026
115.
Russell M. A Stronger Second Chamber? Assessing the Impact of House of Lords Reform in 1999 and the Lessons for Bicameralism. Political Studies. 58(5):866–85. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2009.00810.x
116.
Dunleavy P. Audit 2017: How effective is the Westminster Parliament in scrutinising central government policy-making?’ : Democratic Audit UK [Internet]. 31 AD. Available from: http://www.democraticaudit.com/2017/08/31/audit-2017-how-effective-is-the-westminster-parliament-in-scrutinising-central-government-policy-making/
117.
Matthews F. Majoritarianism Reinterpreted: Effective Representation and the Quality of Westminster Democracy. Parliamentary Affairs. 71(1):50–72. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx011
118.
Kalitowski S. Rubber Stamp or Cockpit? The Impact of Parliament on Government Legislation. Parliamentary Affairs. 61(4):694–708. doi:10.1093/pa/gsn030
119.
Joni Lovenduski. Prime Minister’s questions as political ritual. British Politics. 7(4):314–40. doi:10.1057/bp.2012.13
120.
Thompson L. More of the Same or a Period of Change? The Impact of Bill Committees in the Twenty-First Century House of Commons. Parliamentary Affairs. 66(3):459–79. doi:10.1093/pa/gss016
121.
Thompson L. Debunking the Myths of Bill Committees in the British House of Commons. Politics. 36(1):36–48. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12094
122.
Wolkenstein F. The Labour party, Momentum and the problem with intra-party democracy: Democratic Audit UK [Internet]. 31 AD. Available from: http://www.democraticaudit.com/2016/10/31/the-labour-party-momentum-and-the-problem-with-intra-party-democracy/
123.
Hobolt SB. Brexit and the 2017 UK General Election. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. 56:39–50. doi:10.1111/jcms.12751
124.
Audickas L, Dempsey N, Keen R. Membership of UK political parties - House of Commons Library report [Internet]. 3 AD. Available from: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN05125
125.
Bale T, Webb P, Poletti M. ‘Grassroots: Britain’s party members: who they are, what they think and what they do’ - Mile End Institute report [Internet]. Mile End Institute: Queen Mary University of LOndon. Available from: https://esrcpartymembersprojectorg.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/grassroots-pmp_final.pdf
126.
Pettitt RT. The ‘how’ of election manifestos in the British Labour Party’. Party Politics. 24(3):289–95. doi:10.1177/1354068816678889
127.
Dorey P, Denham A. ‘The Longest Suicide Vote in History’: The Labour Party Leadership Election of 2015. British Politics. 2016;11(3):259–82. doi:10.1057/s41293-016-0001-0
128.
Seyd P, Whiteley P. British Party Members: An Overview. Party Politics. 2004;10(4):355–66. doi:10.1177/1354068804043903
129.
Kavanagh D. Power in British political parties: Iron law or special pleading? West European Politics. 8(3):5–22. doi:10.1080/01402388508424538
130.
Katz RS. No man can serve two masters. Party Politics. 20(2):183–93. doi:10.1177/1354068813519967
131.
Norris P. May’s Law of Curvilinear Disparity Revisited. Party Politics. 1995;1(1):29–47. doi:10.1177/1354068895001001002
132.
Lehrer R. Intra-Party Democracy and Party Responsiveness. West European Politics. 35(6):1295–319. doi:10.1080/01402382.2012.713747
133.
Shaw E. Mandatory reselection: lessons from Labour’s past [Internet]. UCL Constitution Unit Blog; 8 AD. Available from: https://constitution-unit.com/2018/11/08/mandatory-reselection-lessons-from-labours-past/
134.
Denver D. ‘Valence Politics’: How Britain Votes Now’. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 7(2):292–9. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856x.2005.00171.x
135.
Clarke H, Sanders D, Stewart M, Whiteley P. ‘Valence Politics and Electoral Choice in Britain, 2010’. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties. 21(2):237–53. doi:10.1080/17457289.2011.562614
136.
Harold D. Clarke, et al. Valence Politics. In: Political choice in Britain [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004. p. 1–16. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/019924488X.001.0001 doi:DOI:10.1093/019924488X.003.0010
137.
Green J, Hobolt SB. Owning the Issue Agenda: Party Strategies and Vote Choices in British Elections. Electoral Studies. 27(3):460–76. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2008.02.003
138.
Rabinowitz G, Macdonald SE. A Directional Theory of Issue Voting. The American Political Science Review. 83(1). doi:10.2307/1956436
139.
Brandenburg H, Johns R. The Declining Representativeness of the British Party System, and Why It Matters. Political Studies. 62(4):704–25. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12050
140.
Dommett K. Ideological Quietism? Ideology and Party Politics in Britain. Political Studies. n/a-n/a. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12160
141.
Bernard Grofman. Downs and Two-Party Convergence. Annual Review of Political Science. 2004;7:25–46. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.012003.104711
142.
Lees-Marshment J. The Marriage of Politics and Marketing. Political Studies. 49(4):692–713. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.00337
143.
Jonathan Mellon, Geoffrey Evans, Edward Fieldhouse, Jane Green, Christopher Prosser. Brexit or Corbyn? Campaign and Inter-Election Vote Switching in the 2017 UK General Election. Parliamentary Affairs. 71(4):719–37. doi:10.1093/pa/gsy001
144.
Ivor Crewe, Donald D. Searing. Ideological Change in the British Conservative Party. The American Political Science Review. 82(2). doi:10.2307/1957391
145.
Jessop B. Margaret Thatcher and Thatcherism: Dead but not buried. British Politics. 10(S1):16–30. doi:10.1057/bp.2014.22
146.
Steve Buckler, David Dolowitz. Ideology Matters: Party Competition, Ideological Positioning and the Case of the Conservative Party under David Cameron. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 2012;14(4):576–94. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2011.00482.x
147.
Peter Kerr, Christopher Byrne, Emma Foster. Theorising Cameronism. Political Studies Review. 9(2):193–207. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00232.x
148.
Richard Hayton. Constructing a New Conservatism: Ideology and Values. In: Peele G, Francis J, editors. David Cameron and Conservative renewal : the limits of modernisation? Manchester University Press; 2016. p. 41–57.
149.
Hayton R, McEnhill L. Cameron’s Conservative Party, social liberalism and social justice. British Politics. 10(2):131–47. doi:10.1057/bp.2015.19
150.
Timothy Heppell. Cameron and Liberal Conservatism: Attitudes within the Parliamentary Conservative Party and Conservative Ministers. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations. 15(3):340–61. doi:10.1111/j.1467-856X.2012.00546.x
151.
Martin Smith, Rhonda Jones. From big society to small state: Conservatism and the privatisation of government. British Politics. 10(2):226–48. doi:10.1057/bp.2015.23
152.
Tim Bale. The Conservative Party: From Thatcher to Cameron. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Polity; 2016.
153.
Dorey P, Garnett M. The weaker-willed, the craven-hearted : the decline of One Nation Conservatism. Global discourse [Internet]. 2015;5(1):69–91. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2014.914823
154.
Heath A. Theresa May’s speech shows that free-market ideas are in decline - Daily Telegraph [Internet]. 5 AD. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2016/10/05/no-prime-minister-the-government-doesnt-always-know-whats-best/
155.
Hall M. Theresa May promises bright future for all in conference speech - Daily Express [Internet]. 6 AD. Available from: http://www.express.co.uk/news/politics/718107/Theresa-May-promises-bright-future-for-all
156.
Kriss S. Theresa May’s Conference Speech Gave a Monstrous Ideology a Human Face, Vice UK [Internet]. 5 AD. Available from: http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/theresa-may-conference-speech-2016
157.
Theresa May’s speech to the Conservative Party Conference, 5 October 2016 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37563510
158.
Vincent A. New Ideologies for Old? The Political Quarterly. 69(1):48–58. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.00136
159.
Michael Freeden. The Ideology of New Labour. The Political Quarterly. 70(1):42–51. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.00203
160.
Heffernan R. ‘Labour’s New Labour Legacy: Politics after Blair and Brown’. Political Studies Review. 9(2):163–77. doi:10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00230.x
161.
Atkins J. Narrating One Nation: The Ideology and Rhetoric of the Miliband Labour Party. Politics. 35(1):19–31. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12076
162.
Peter Dorey, Andrew Denham. The Longest Suicide Vote in History: The Labour Party Leadership Election of 2015. British Politics. Volume 11(3):259–82. doi:10.1057/s41293-016-0001-0
163.
Ben Jackson. Labour’s ideology: towards common ground. Renewal - A Journal of Social Democracy [Internet]. 2015;23(4):5–10. Available from: https://renewal.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/jackson_23.4_final-1.pdf
164.
Nadia Khomami. What does Jeremy Corbyn think? - The Guardian [Internet]. 12 AD. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/sep/12/what-does-jeremy-corbyn-think
165.
Tom Quinn. What did Corbyn say in his Conference speech? - Prospect Magazine [Internet]. 28 AD. Available from: http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics/what-did-corbyn-say-in-his-conference-speech
166.
Wilkinson M. Jeremy Corbyn pledges socialism for 21st century as he plans business tax hike and benefits free-for-all. [Internet]. 28 AD. Available from: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/28/jeremy-corbyn-immigration-labour-conference-speech-live/
167.
Jeremy Corbyn’s speech to the Labour Party conference, 28 September 2016 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37500290
168.
The Conservative Party.
169.
Labour Party [Internet]. Available from: http://www.labour.org.uk/
170.
The Liberal Democrats.
171.
SNP (Scottish National Party) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.snp.org/
172.
UKIP (the United Kingdom Independence Party) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ukip.org/
173.
UK Polling Report.
174.
Ros Taylor. How well does the UK’s media system support democratic politics and represent citizens’ interests? - Democratic Audit UK [Internet]. 30 AD. Available from: http://www.democraticaudit.com/2018/08/30/2018audit-how-well-does-the-uks-media-system-support-democratic-politics-and-represent-citizens-interests/
175.
Chadwick A, Vaccari C, O’Loughlin B. Do tabloids poison the well of social media? Explaining democratically dysfunctional news sharing’. New Media & Society. doi:10.1177/1461444818769689
176.
Stephen Ward, Dominic Wring. Out with the Old, In with the New? The Media Campaign. Parliamentary Affairs. 71(suppl_1):203–21. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx057
177.
Tony Blair and others. Tony Blair’s Reuters Speech on the Media and responses. Political Quarterly [Internet]. Volume 78(4):471–98. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2007.00877.x
178.
The Political Quarterly : Vol 78 , No 4. The Political Quarterly [Internet]. 78(4). Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/1467923x/2007/78/4
179.
Ken Newton. Public Service and Commercial Broadcasting: Impacts on Politics and Society. The Political Quarterly. 87(1):31–8. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12214
180.
Barnett S, Seaton J. Why the BBC Matters: Memo to the New Parliament about a Unique British Institution. The Political Quarterly. 81(3):327–32. doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.2010.02117.x
181.
Newton K. May the Weak Force Be with You: The Power of the Mass Media in Modern Politics. European Journal of Political Research. 45(2):209–34. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00296.x
182.
Ringen S. Why the British Press Is Brilliant. British Journalism Review. 2003 Sep 1;14(3):31–7. doi:10.1177/09564748030143007
183.
Paul Baker, Costas Gabrielatos, Tony McEnery. Sketching Muslims: A Corpus Driven Analysis of Representations Around the Word ‘Muslim’ in the British Press 1998–2009. Applied Linguistics. 34(3):255–78. doi:10.1093/applin/ams048
184.
Narayanan V, Howard PN, Kollanyi B, Elswah M. Russian Involvement and Junk News during Brexit – Oxford Internet Institute [Internet]. 2017. Available from: https://blogs.oii.ox.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/93/2017/12/Russia-and-Brexit-v27.pdf
185.
Monica Kaminska, John D. Gallacher, Bence Kollanyi, Taha Yasseri, Philip N. Howard. Social Media and News Sources during the 2017 UK General Election – Oxford Internet Institute [Internet]. 6 AD. Available from: http://comprop.oii.ox.ac.uk/research/social-media-and-news-sources-during-the-2017-uk-general-election/
186.
Stephen Ward, Dominic Wring. Out with the Old, In with the New? The Media Campaign. Parliamentary Affairs. 71(suppl_1):203–21. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx057
187.
Dommett K, Temple L. Digital Campaigning: The Rise of Facebook and Satellite Campaigns. Parliamentary Affairs. 71(suppl_1):189–202. doi:10.1093/pa/gsx056
188.
Elizabeth Dubois, Grant Blank. The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society. 21(5):729–45. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
189.
Breeze R. '"Enemies of the people”: Populist performances in the Daily Mail reporting of the Article 50 case’. Discourse, Context & Media. 25:60–7. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2018.03.008
190.
Julianne Kerr Morrison, Ravi Naik, Stephanie Hankey. Data and Democracy in the Digital Age, The Constitution Society [Internet]. 10 AD. Available from: https://consoc.org.uk/publications/data-and-democracy-in-the-digital-age/
191.
House of Commons Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee, ‘Disinformation and “Fake News”: Final Report’, Eighth Report of Session 2017-19 [Internet]. 14 AD. Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmcumeds/1791/1791.pdf
192.
Colm O’Cinneide. Human rights and the UK constitution, British Academy [Internet]. London: British Academy; 2012. Available from: http://www.britac.ac.uk/policy/Human-rights.cfm
193.
Mark Bevir. The Westminster Model, Governance and Judicial Reform. Parliamentary Affairs. 61(4):559–77. doi:10.1093/pa/gsn025
194.
Masterman R. ‘Labour’s “Juridification” of the Constitution’. Parliamentary Affairs. 62(3):476–92. doi:10.1093/pa/gsp013
195.
Anthony King. The Judges Come Out. In: The British Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 115–49.
196.
Anthony King. The Judges Come Out. In: The British constitution [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. p. 116–50. Available from: https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576982.001.0001/acprof-9780199576982-chapter-6
197.
Colm O’Cinneide. Human Rights and the UK Constitution. In: The Changing Constitution. 8th edn. Oxford University Press; 2015. p. 67–103.
198.
Ministry of Justice, ‘Responding to Human Rights judgments: Report to the Joint Committee on Human Rights on the Government’s response to Human Rights judgments 2017–18’, November 2018 [Internet]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/756346/responding-human-rights-judgments-2017-18.pdf
199.
Ewing KD. The Human Rights Act and Parliamentary Democracy. Modern Law Review. 62(1):79–99. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00192
200.
Ewing KD, Tham JC. The Continuing Futility of the Human Rights Act. Public Law [Internet]. 2008;668–93. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joo-Cheong_Tham/publication/237405461_The_Continuing_Futility_of_the_Human_Rights_Act/links/02e7e52de10a605042000000.pdf
201.
K.D. Ewing. The Resilience of the Political Constitution. German Law Journal [Internet]. 2013;14:2111–36. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/germlajo14&div=111&g_sent=1&collection=journals
202.
Aileen Kavanagh. ‘What’s so Weak About “Weak-Form Review”? The Case of the UK Human Rights Act 1998’. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2015. doi:https://academic.oup.com/icon/article/13/4/1008/2450828
203.
Stephen Gardbaum. What’s so weak about "weak-form review”? A reply to Aileen Kavanagh. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 13(4):1040–8. doi:10.1093/icon/mov063
204.
Adrian Vermeule. The Atrophy of Constitutional Powers. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 32(3):421–44. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqs010
205.
Neil Johnston. Prisoners’ voting rights: developments since May 2015 - House of Commons Library briefing paper CBP-7461 [Internet]. 11 AD. Available from: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7461
206.
Adams E. 'Prisoners’ Voting Rights: Case Closed?’, UK Constitutional Law Association blog [Internet]. 30 AD. Available from: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2019/01/30/elizabeth-adams-prisoners-voting-rights-case-closed/
207.
Vernon Bogdanor. Brexit and our unprotected constitution - The Constitution Society [Internet]. Available from: https://consoc.org.uk/publications/brexit-unprotected-british-constitution/
208.
Young, Alison L. The Constitutional Implications of Brexit. European Public Law [Internet]. 2017;23(4):757–86. Available from: http://www.kluwerlawonline.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=EURO2017043
209.
Michael Blauberger, Susanne K. Schmidt. The European Court of Justice and its political impact. West European Politics. 40(4):907–18. doi:10.1080/01402382.2017.1281652
210.
Michael Blauberger, Anita Heindlmaier, Dion Kramer, Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen, Angelika Schenk, Jessica Sampson Thierry, et al. ECJ Judges Read the Morning Papers. Explaining the Turnaround of European Citizenship Jurisprudence’. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1–41. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3123003
211.
Donald A, Gordon J, Leach P. The UK and the European Court of Human Rights – Equality and Human Rights Commission Research Report 83 [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.equalityhumanrights.com/sites/default/files/documents/research/83._european_court_of_human_rights.pdf
212.
Hazell R, Sandford M. English Question or Union Question? Neither Has Easy Answers. The Political Quarterly. 86(1):16–23. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12132
213.
Sheldon J. Intergovernmental relations and the English question: options for reform. Constitution Unit Blog [Internet]. 16 AD. Available from: https://constitution-unit.com/2018/08/16/intergovernmental-relations-and-the-english-question-options-for-reform/
214.
Torrance D. Intergovernmental relations in the United Kingdom, House of Commons Library briefing [Internet]. Available from: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-8371
215.
House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Devolution and Exiting the EU: Reconciling Differences and Building Strong Relationships, Eighth Report of Session 2017-19 [Internet]. 31 AD. Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmpubadm/1485/1485.pdf
216.
Anthony King. John Bull’s Other Lands. In: The British Constitution [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. p. 179–214. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576982.001.0001
217.
King A. The British constitution [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576982.001.0001
218.
Curtice J. A Stronger or Weaker Union? Public Reactions to Asymmetric Devolution in the United Kingdom. Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 36(1):95–113. doi:10.1093/publius/pjj006
219.
Nicola McEwen. Still better together? Purpose and power in intergovernmental councils in the UK. Regional & Federal Studies. 27(5):667–90. doi:10.1080/13597566.2017.1389724
220.
Jeffery C. As devolution has progressed the centre has failed to imagine a new rationale for the union, UCL Constitution Unit Blog [Internet]. 6 AD. Available from: https://constitution-unit.com/2015/10/06/as-devolution-has-progressed-the-centre-has-failed-to-imagine-a-new-rationale-for-the-union/
221.
The Political Quarterly [Internet]. Vol. 86. 86(2). Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/poqu.2015.86.issue-2/issuetoc
222.
Trench A. Devolution in the Round: Can Britain Continue to Muddle through? Political Insight. 5(3):4–7. doi:10.1111/2041-9066.12066
223.
The Smith Commission [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20151202171017/http://www.smith-commission.scot/
224.
House of Commons Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee, Devolution and Exiting the EU: Reconciling Differences and Building Strong Relationships, Eighth Report of Session 2017-19 [Internet]. 31 AD. Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmpubadm/1485/1485.pdf
225.
Meg Russell, Jack Sheldon. Options for an English Parliament - UCL Constitution Unit report [Internet]. 2018. Available from: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/research/parliament/english-parliament
226.
Campaign for an English Parliament [Internet]. Available from: http://thecep.org.uk/
227.
John Denham. A nation divided? The identities, politics and governance of England, openDemocracy UK blog [Internet]. 16 AD. Available from: https://www.opendemocracy.net/uk/john-denham/nation-divided-identities-politics-and-governance-of-england
228.
Hazell R. The English Question. Devolution series. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2006.
229.
Richard Kelly. English votes for English laws - House of Commons Library briefing [Internet]. 20 AD. Available from: https://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/CBP-7339
230.
Daniel Gover, Michael Kenny. One year of EVEL: evaluating ‘English votes for English laws’ in the House of Commons - The UCL Constitution Unit Blog [Internet]. 28 AD. Available from: https://constitution-unit.com/2016/11/28/one-year-of-evel-evaluating-english-votes-for-english-laws-in-the-house-of-commons/
231.
Vaughne Miller. How much legislation comes from Europe? – House of Commons Library Research Briefing [Internet]. 13 AD. Available from: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/RP10-62
232.
Simon Bulmer, Martin Burch. The Europeanization of UK Government: from Quiet Revolution to Explicit Step-Change? Public Administration. 83(4):861–90. doi:10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00481.x
233.
John Curtice, Sarah Tipping. A more informed public? The impact of the Brexit debate. In: British Social Attitudes [Internet]. NatCen Social Research; 2018. p. 1–33. Available from: http://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/latest-report/british-social-attitudes-35/europe.aspx?_ga=2.213850324.1750374658.1538224605-1637657831.1537625703
234.
HMG, Review of the Balance of Competences [Internet]. Foreign & Commonwealth Office; 2012. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/review-of-the-balance-of-competences
235.
Mark Elliott. United Kingdom: Parliamentary Sovereignty under Pressure. International Journal of Constitutional Law [Internet]. 2004;2(1):545–55. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/injcl2&div=30&g_sent=1&collection=journals#
236.
John Curtice. Euroscepticism. In: British Social Attitudes 33 [Internet]. NatCen Social Research; 2016. p. 1–19. Available from: http://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/latest-report/british-social-attitudes-33/euroscepticism.aspx
237.
John Curtice, Sarah Tipping. A more informed public? The impact of the Brexit debate. In: British Social Attitudes [Internet]. NatCen Social Research; 2018. p. 1–33. Available from: http://www.bsa.natcen.ac.uk/latest-report/british-social-attitudes-35/europe.aspx?_ga=2.213850324.1750374658.1538224605-1637657831.1537625703
238.
Eurobarometer - European Commission [Internet]. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/General/index
239.
Lord Ashcroft. You Should Hear What They Say about You, Lord Ashcroft polling report [Internet]. Available from: https://lordashcroftpolls.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/LORD-ASHCROFT-POLLS-You-Should-Hear-What-They-Say-About-You-EU28-Poll-Report-Feb-2016.pdf
240.
Buller J. Britain as an Awkward Partner: Reassessing Britain’s Relations with the EU. Politics [Internet]. 1995 Feb;15(1):33–42. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9256.1995.tb00018.x
241.
Stephen George. A Reply to Buller. Politics [Internet]. 15(1):43–7. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9256.1995.tb00019.x
242.
Wilks S. Britain and Europe: An Awkward Partner or an Awkward State? Politics [Internet]. 16(3):159–65. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9256.1996.tb00035.x
243.
Oliver Daddow, Tim Oliver. A not so awkward partner: the UK has been a champion of many causes in the EU, LSE Brexit blog [Internet]. 15 AD. Available from: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/brexit/2016/04/15/a-not-so-awkward-partner-the-uk-has-been-a-champion-of-many-causes-in-the-eu/
244.
Vivien A. Schmidt. Procedural democracy in the EU: the Europeanization of national and sectoral policy-making processes’. Journal of European Public Policy. 13(5):670–91. doi:10.1080/13501760600808444
245.
Oliver Daddow. The UK media and ‘Europe’: from permissive consensus to destructive dissent. International Affairs. 88(6):1219–36. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01129.x
246.
Nicholas Startin. Have we reached a tipping point? The mainstreaming of Euroscepticism in the UK. International Political Science Review. 36(3):311–23. doi:10.1177/0192512115574126
247.
Lori Thorlakson. Britain’s Place in the European Union. In: Developments in British Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011. p. 257–79.
248.
Vernon Bogdanor. Europe and the Sovereignty of the People. The Political Quarterly. 87(3):348–51. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12297
249.
Deborah Mabbett. Parliamentary Sovereignty and Brexit. The Political Quarterly. 88(2):167–9. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.12364
250.
Keith Ewing. Brexit and Parliamentary Sovereignty. The Modern Law Review. 80(4):711–26. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.12281
251.
Owen J, Lloyd L, Rutter J. Preparing Brexit: How ready is Whitehall? - Institute for Government report [Internet]. 10 AD. Available from: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/preparing-brexit-how-ready-whitehall
252.
Joe Owen, Tim Durrant, Lewis Lloyd, Jill Rutter. Brexit: six months to go - Institute for Government report [Internet]. 17 AD. Available from: https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publications/brexit-six-months-go
253.
John Curtice. Do voters still want to leave the EU? How they view the Brexit process two years on - UK in a changing Europe report [Internet]. 7 AD. Available from: http://ukandeu.ac.uk/research-papers/do-voters-still-want-to-leave-the-eu-how-they-view-the-brexit-process-two-years-on/
254.
Matthew Bevington, Jack Simson Caird, Alan Wager. The Brexit Endgame: A Short Guide - UK in a Changing Europe report [Internet]. Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law; 29 AD. Available from: http://ukandeu.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Brexit-endgame-a-short-guide.pdf
255.
House of Commons Exiting the EU Committee, ‘Parliamentary Scrutiny and Approval of the Withdrawal Agreement and Negotiations on a Future Relationship’, Sixth Report of Session 2017-19 [Internet]. 28 AD. Available from: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cmselect/cmexeu/1240/1240.pdf
256.
Constitution Unit Blog - Brexit theme [Internet]. Available from: https://constitution-unit.com/category/europe/
257.
Alan Renwick, Meg Russell. Monitor 64: Brexit and the transformation of British politics. UCL Constitution Unit Blog [Internet]. 24 AD. Available from: https://constitution-unit.com/2016/10/24/monitor-64-brexit-and-the-transformation-of-british-politics/
258.
Alan Renwick. The process of Brexit: what comes next? UCL Constitution Unit Blog [Internet]. 8 AD. Available from: https://constitution-unit.com/2017/02/08/the-process-of-brexit-what-comes-next/
259.
Philip Lynch, Richard Whitaker. Divided but influential? The Exiting the European Union select committee. UCL Constitution Unit Blog [Internet]. 10 AD. Available from: https://constitution-unit.com/2018/05/10/divided-but-influential-the-exiting-the-european-union-select-committee/
260.
Nicola McEwen. Crisis, headache, or sideshow: how should the UK government respond to the Scottish parliament’s decision to withhold consent for the Withdrawal Bill? UCL Constitution Unit Blog [Internet]. 30 AD. Available from: https://constitution-unit.com/2018/05/30/crisis-headache-or-sideshow-how-should-the-uk-government-respond-to-the-scottish-parliaments-decision-to-withhold-consent-for-the-withdrawal-bill/
261.
Mark Elliott, Jack Williams, Alison Young. The executive’s Brexit: the UK Constitution after Miller. UCL Constitution Unit Blog [Internet]. 21 AD. Available from: https://constitution-unit.com/2018/08/21/the-executives-brexit-the-uk-constitution-after-miller/#more-6958
262.
Wincott D. Brexit and the territorial constitution: déjà vu all over again? UCL Constitution Unit Blog [Internet]. 11 AD. Available from: https://constitution-unit.com/2018/09/11/brexit-and-the-territorial-constitution-deja-vu-all-over-again/
263.
Jess Sargeant, Alan Renwick, Meg Russell. The Mechanics of a Further Referendum on Brexit. UCL Constitution Unit report [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/research/electionsandreferendums/The_Mechanics_of_a_Further_Referendum_on_Brexit
264.
Vernon Bogdanor, Dominic Grieve, Joe Owen, Tony Travers. Brexit: the impact on government and parliament - seminar at the LSE [Internet]. 23 AD. Available from: http://www.lse.ac.uk/european-institute/events/2018-19/Impact-on-Government/Brexit-the-impact-on-government-and-parliament