[2]
‘ICSID - International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes’. [Online]. Available: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=ShowHome&pageName=Cases_Home
[3]
‘Cases - PCA’. [Online]. Available: http://pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=1029
[4]
‘Energy Charter: Investor-State Disputes’. [Online]. Available: http://www.encharter.org/index.php?id=213
[5]
‘List of All Cases International Court of Justice’. [Online]. Available: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=2
[6]
‘Permanent Court of International Justice’. [Online]. Available: http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/index.php?p1=9
[7]
‘Reports of International Arbitral Awards’. [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/law/riaa/
[8]
‘Investment Claims’. [Online]. Available: http://oxia.ouplaw.com/home/ic
[9]
‘NAFTA Claims’. [Online]. Available: http://www.naftaclaims.com./
[10]
Paparinskis, Mārtiņš, Basic documents on international investment protection, vol. Documents in international law. Oxford: Hart, 2012.
[11]
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of international investment law, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[12]
Lowe, A. V., International law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[13]
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of international investment law, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://opil-ouplaw-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/10.1093/law/9780199651795.001.0001/law-9780199651795
[14]
J. Crawford, ‘Continuity and Discontinuity in International Dispute Settlement: An Inaugural Lecture’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 3–24, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1093/jnlids/idp001.
[15]
M. Paparinskis, ‘Introduction’, in Basic documents on international investment protection, vol. Documents in international law, Oxford: Hart, 2012, pp. 3–12.
[16]
Vandevelde, Kenneth J., ‘Brief History of International Investment Agreements, A’, U.C. Davis Journal of International Law & Policy, vol. 12, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ucdl12&id=163&collection=journals&index=journals/ucdl#163
[17]
‘Asian Agricultural Products Ltd (AAPL) v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/87/3, Final Award’. Jun. 27, 1990 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf
[18]
‘Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Guinea v DRC) (Preliminary Objections) [2007] ICJ Rep 582’. .
[19]
‘Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Guinea v DRC) (Judgment: Merits) [2010] ICJ Rep 639, Joint Dissenting Opinion of Judges Al-Khasawneh and Yusuf 700’. [Online]. Available: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/103/16244.pdf
[20]
‘Franck Charles Arif v Moldova, ICSID Case no ARB/11/23, Award’. Apr. 08, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1370.pdf
[21]
‘Philip Morris et al v Uruguay, ICSID Case no ARB/10/7, Decision on Jurisdiction’. Jul. 02, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1531.pdf
[22]
‘1967 OECD Draft Convention on the Protection of Foreign Property’, 1967. [Online]. Available: http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/oecdworkoninternationalinvestmentlaw.htm
[23]
‘1991 US-Argentina BIT’. 1991 [Online]. Available: http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/argentina_us.pdf
[24]
‘2006 International Law Commission’s Articles on Diplomatic Protection’. [Online]. Available: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%20articles/9_8_2006.pdf
[25]
V. Lowe, ‘Changing Dimensions of International Investment Law’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.970727.
[26]
Newcombe, Andrew and Paradell, Lluís, ‘Chapter 1 of Law and practice of investment treaties’, in Law and practice of investment treaties: standards of treatment, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009.
[27]
Paparinskis, Mārtiņš, ‘Chapters 1-3’, in The international minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment, vol. Oxford monographs in international law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14503354470004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[28]
A. R. Parra, The History of ICSID. Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660568.001.0001/acprof-9780199660568
[29]
J. Pauwelyn, ‘At the Edge of Chaos? Emergence and Change in International Investment Law’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2271869.
[30]
‘Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain) (New Application: 1962) (Judgment) [1970] ICJ Rep 4’. [Online]. Available: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/50/5387.pdf
[31]
‘- Elettronica Sicula S.p.A. (ELSI) (US v Italy) [1989] ICJ Rep 15’. 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/76/6707.pdf
[32]
‘Tokio Tokelés v Ukraine, ICSID Case no ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction’. Apr. 29, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0863.pdf
[33]
‘1927 Resolution of the Institute of International Law on the International Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigner’. [Online]. Available: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_96.pdf
[34]
‘1929 Harvard Draft Convention on the Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigner’. [Online]. Available: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_96.pdf
[35]
‘1930 Text of Articles Adopted in First Reading by the Third Committee of the Hague Conference for the Codification of International Law’. [Online]. Available: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_96.pdf
[36]
‘1959 Abs-Shawcross Draft Convention on Investment Abroad’. [Online]. Available: http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/Compendium/en/137%2520volume%25205.pdf
[37]
‘1961 Harvard Draft Convention on the International Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens’. [Online]. Available: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_217.pdf
[38]
‘1961 García-Amador’s Revised Draft on International Responsibility of the State for Injuries Caused in its Territory to the Person or Property of Aliens’. [Online]. Available: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_134_add1.pdf
[39]
‘1962 UNGA Res 1803 (XVII) Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources’. [Online]. Available: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/1803%28XVII%29
[40]
‘1974 UNGA Res 3281 (XXIX) Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States’. [Online]. Available: http://www.un-documents.net/a29r3281.htm
[41]
‘1959 Germany-Pakistan BIT’. [Online]. Available: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2006/investment_pakistan_germany.pdf
[42]
‘1965 Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States’. [Online]. Available: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/ICSID/RulesMain.jsp
[43]
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of international investment law, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://opil-ouplaw-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/10.1093/law/9780199651795.001.0001/law-9780199651795
[44]
Z. Douglas, ‘1) The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, British Year Book of International Law, vol. 74, no. 1, 2003, doi: 151-289 doi:10.1093/bybil/74.1.151. [Online]. Available: http://bybil.oxfordjournals.org/content/74/1/151.full.pdf+html
[45]
Douglas, Zachary, ‘2) Chapter 1’, in The international law of investment claims, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14508605270004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[46]
Gus Van Harten, ‘The Public-Private Distinction in the International Arbitration of Individual Claims against the State’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 371–394, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4498073
[47]
M. Paparinskis, ‘1) Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility’, European Journal of International Law, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 617–647, May 2013, doi: 10.1093/ejil/cht025.
[48]
M. Paparinskis, ‘2) Analogies and Other Regimes of International Law by Martins Paparinskis’, in The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice, Oxford University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2312308
[49]
M. Reisman, ‘"Case Specific Mandate” versus "Systemic Implications”: How Should Investment Tribunals Decide?’, Arbitration International, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 131–152, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=KLI-KA-ARBI-290201
[50]
‘CLASH OF PARADIGMS: ACTORS AND ANALOGIES SHAPING THE INVESTMENT TREATY SYSTEM’, The American Journal of International Law, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 45–94, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0045.
[51]
‘Archer Daniel Midlands et al v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/5, Award’. Nov. 21, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0037_0.pdf
[52]
‘Archer Daniel Midlands et al v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/5, Award, Concurring Opinion of Arbitrator Rovine’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0039.pdf
[53]
‘Burlington Resources Inc. v Ecuador, ICSID Case no ARB/08/5, Decision on Liability’. Jun. 14, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1094_0.pdf
[54]
‘Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf
[55]
J. E. Alvarez, ‘Chapter II (What are Investment Treaties for?)’, in The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment (Pocket Books of the Hague Academy of International Law//Les) [Paperback], Martinus Nijhoff Publishers / Brill Academic (30 Nov 2011), 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Public-International-Governing-Investment-Academy/dp/9004186824/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1382438886&sr=8-1&keywords=Public+International+Law+Regime+Governing+International+Investment
[56]
Z. Douglas, ‘The Enforcement of Environmental Norms in Investment Treaty Arbitration’, in Harnessing foreign investment to promote environmental protection: incentives and safeguards, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013, pp. 418–424.
[57]
Yackee, Jason Webb, ‘Controlling the International Investment Law Agency’, Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 53, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hilj53&id=395&collection=journals&index=journals/hilj#395
[58]
M. Paparinskis, ‘The Limits of Depoliticisation in Contemporary Investor-State Arbitration’, SSRN Journal, 2010. [Online]. Available: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1716833
[59]
J. Pauwelyn, ‘At the Edge of Chaos? Emergence and Change in International Investment Law’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2013, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2271869.
[60]
S. Puig, ‘Emergence and Dynamism in International Organizations: ICSID, Investor-State Arbitration, and International Investment Law’, SSRN Journal, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2297219
[61]
Salacuse, Jeswald W., ‘Emerging Global Regime for Investment, The’, Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 51, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=427&handle=hein.journals%252Fhilj51&collection=journals#431
[62]
S. W. Schill, ‘1) The Multilateralization of International Investment Law - Emergence of a Multilateral System of Investment Protection on Bilateral Grounds’, Trade, Law and Development, vol. 2, no. 1, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.tradelawdevelopment.com/index.php/tld/article/view/2%25281%2529%2520TL%2526D%252059%2520%25282010%2529
[63]
Schill, Stephan, 2) The multilateralization of international investment law, vol. International trade and economic law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605451
[64]
Schill, Stephan W., ‘Enhancing International Investment Law’s Legitimacy: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations of a New Public Law Approach’, Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 52, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vajint52&id=62&collection=journals&index=journals/vajint#62
[65]
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Chapters 3-5’, in Principles of international investment law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[66]
Alvarez, Jose E., ‘Bit on Custom, A’, New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, vol. 42, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nyuilp42&id=21&collection=journals&index=journals/nyuilp
[67]
McLachlan, Campbell, ‘Investment Treaties and General International Law’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 57, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=361&handle=hein.journals%252Fincolq57&collection=journals
[68]
J. Paulsson, ‘Treaty Arbitration and the Generation of Legal Norms’. [Online]. Available: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:mU1wo0tzP_gJ:www.biicl.org/files/3055_jan_paulsson_-_treaty_arbitration_and_international_law.doc &cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&client=firefox-a
[69]
M. Reisman, ‘"Case Specific Mandate” versus "Systemic Implications”: How Should Investment Tribunals Decide?’, Arbitration International, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 131–152, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=KLI-KA-ARBI-290201
[70]
Anthea Roberts, ‘POWER AND PERSUASION IN INVESTMENT TREATY INTERPRETATION’:, The American Journal of International Law, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 179–225, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5305/amerjintelaw.104.2.0179
[71]
M. Paparinskis, ‘EJIL: Talk! – The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment’, Aug. 12, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-international-minimum-standard-and-fair-and-equitable-treatment/
[72]
F. Berman, ‘EJIL: Talk! – The Interpretation and Application of Fair and Equitable Treatment: An Arbitrator’s Perspective’, Aug. 13, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-interpretation-and-application-of-fair-and-equitable-treatment-an-arbitrators-perspective/
[73]
M. Paparinskis, ‘EJIL: Talk! – A Reply to Sir Frank Berman’, Aug. 15, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.ejiltalk.org/a-reply-to-sir-frank-berman/
[74]
F. Berman, ‘EJIL: Talk! – Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Rejoinder to Martins Paparinskis’, Aug. 16, 2013. [Online]. Available: http://www.ejiltalk.org/fair-and-equitable-treatment-a-rejoinder-to-martins-paparinskis/
[75]
‘Ambiente Ufficio SpA et al v Argentina, ICSID Case no’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1276.pdf
[76]
‘Chemtura Corporation v Canada, UNCITRAL Case, Award’. Aug. 02, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0149_0.pdf
[77]
‘CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/01/8, Decision of the ad hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic’. Sep. 25, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0187.pdf
[78]
‘Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award’. Jun. 26, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf
[79]
‘Railroad Development Corporation v Guatemala, ICSID Case no ARB/07/23, Submission of the US’. Jan. 31, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0709_0.pdf
[80]
‘Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award’. Mar. 17, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf
[81]
‘Statute of the International Court of Justice’. [Online]. Available: http://www.icj-cij.org/documents/index.php?p1=4&p2=2&p3=0#CHAPTER_II
[82]
‘Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’. [Online]. Available: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf
[83]
‘North American Free Trade Commission’s Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions’, Jul. 31, 2001. [Online]. Available: http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/NAFTA-Interpr.aspx?lang=eng
[84]
‘2006 Conclusions of the work of the ILC Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’. [Online]. Available: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%2520articles/1_9_2006.pdf
[85]
Arsanjani, Mahnoush H., ‘Interpreting Treaties for the Benefit of Third Parties: The Salvors Doctrine and the Use of Legislative History in Investment Treaties’, American Journal of International Law, vol. 104, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=597&handle=hein.journals%252Fajil104&collection=journals#605
[86]
McLachlan, Campbell, ‘Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(C) of the Vienna Convention, The’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 54, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq54&id=289&collection=journals&index=journals/incolq#289
[87]
Nolte, Georg, Treaties and subsequent practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
[88]
M. Paparinskis, ‘Analogies and Other Regimes of International Law’, SSRN Journal, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2312308
[89]
M. Paparinskis, ‘1) Investment Treaty Interpretation and Customary Investment Protection Law: Preliminary Remarks’, in Evolution in investment treaty law and arbitration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139043809
[90]
M. Paparinskis, ‘2) Chapter 6’, in The international minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment, vol. Oxford monographs in international law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14503354470004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[91]
Schwebel, Stephen M., ‘Influence of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Customary International Law, The’, American Society of International Law Proceedings, vol. 98, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=27&handle=hein.journals%252Fasilp98&collection=journals#41
[92]
B. Simma and T. Kill, ‘Harmonizing Investment Protection and International Human Rights: First Steps towards a Methodology’, in International investment law for the 21st century: essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9930966404504761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,International%20investment%20law%20for%20the%2021st%20century:%20essays%20in%20honour%20of%20Christoph%20Schreuer&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9011823993333656972&offset=0
[93]
B. Simma, ‘2) FOREIGN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION: A PLACE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS?’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 60, no. 03, pp. 573–596, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1017/S0020589311000224.
[94]
J. E. Vinuales, ‘Foreign Investment and the Environment in International Law: An Ambiguous Relationship’, British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 244–332, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1093/bybil/80.1.244.
[95]
‘HICEE BV v Slovakia, UNCITRAL, PCA Case 2009-11, Partial Award’. May 23, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0404_0.pdf
[96]
‘Rompetrol Group v Romania, ICSID Case no ARB/06/3, Award’. May 06, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1408.pdf
[97]
‘Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v Russia, PCA Case no AA 227, Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility’. Nov. 30, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0910.pdf
[98]
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Chapters 22-23’, in Principles of international investment law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[99]
M. Paparinskis, ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility’, European Journal of International Law, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 617–647, May 2013, doi: 10.1093/ejil/cht025.
[100]
‘2001 International Law Commission’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’. [Online]. Available: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%2520articles/9_6_2001.pdf
[101]
J. Crawford, ‘1) Investment Arbitration and the ILC Articles on State Responsibility’, ICSID Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 127–199, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1093/icsidreview/25.1.127.
[102]
Crawford, James, 2) State responsibility: the general part, vol. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139033060
[103]
Z. Douglas, ‘Other Specific Regimes of Responsibility: Investment Treaty Arbitration and ICSID’, in The law of international responsibility, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14503354980004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[104]
M. Paparinskis, ‘Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures’, British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 264–352, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1093/bybil/79.1.264.
[105]
‘ADC Affiliate Limited and ADC & ADMC Management Limited v. The Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case no ARB/03/16, Award’. Oct. 02, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0006.pdf
[106]
‘Archer Daniel Midlands et al v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/5, Award’. Nov. 21, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0037_0.pdf
[107]
‘Chevron et al v Ecuador, UNCITRAL, PCA Case no 34877, Interim Award’. Dec. 01, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0150.pdf
[108]
‘CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/01/8, Decision of the ad hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic’. Sep. 25, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0187.pdf
[109]
‘Corn Products, International, Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/1, Decision on Responsibility’. Jan. 15, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0244.pdf
[110]
‘Factory at Chorzow (Germany v Poland) (Merits) [1928] PCIJ Rep Series A no 17’. [Online]. Available: http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_17/54_Usine_de_Chorzow_Fond_Arret.pdf
[111]
‘Gustav F W Hamester GmbH & Co KG v Ghana, ICSID Case no ARB/07/24, Award’. Jun. 18, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0396.pdf
[112]
‘Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award’. Jun. 26, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf
[113]
J. Crawford, ‘Investment Arbitration and the ILC Articles on State Responsibility’, ICSID Review, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 127–199, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1093/icsidreview/25.1.127.
[114]
‘2006 International Law Commission’s Articles on Diplomatic Protection’. [Online]. Available: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft articles/9_8_2006.pdf
[115]
J. Crawford, ‘International Protection of Foreign Direct Investments: Between Clinical Isolation and Systemic Integration’, in International investment law and general international law: from clinical isolation to systemic integration?, 1. Aufl., vol. Schriften zur Europäischen Integration und internationalen Wirtschaftsordnung, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy12pdf01/2011291061.html
[116]
Crawford, James, State responsibility: the general part, vol. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
[117]
J. Crawford, ‘Treaty and Contract in Investment Arbitration’, Arbitration International, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 351–374, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn30591
[118]
Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon, The law of international responsibility, vol. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[119]
Z. Douglas, ‘1) The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’, British Year Book of International Law, vol. 74, no. 1, 2003, doi: 151-289 doi:10.1093/bybil/74.1.151. [Online]. Available: http://bybil.oxfordjournals.org/content/74/1/151.full.pdf+html
[120]
Douglas, Zachary, ‘2) Chapter 1’, in The international law of investment claims, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14508605270004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[121]
M. Paparinskis, ‘Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures’, British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 264–352, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1093/bybil/79.1.264.
[122]
‘Archer Daniel Midlands et al v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/5, Award, Concurring Opinion of Arbitrator Rovine’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0039.pdf
[123]
‘Cargill, Incorporated v Mexico, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/05/2, Award’. Sep. 18, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0133_0.pdf
[124]
‘Corn Products, International, Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/1, Decision on Responsibility, Separate Opinion of Arbitrator Lowenfeld’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0246.pdf
[125]
‘Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. et al v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/01/3, Decision on Application for Annulment by Argentina’. Jul. 30, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0299.pdf
[126]
‘Mytilineos Holdings SA v Serbia, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award on Jurisdiction’. Sep. 08, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0549.pdf
[127]
‘Sempra Energy International v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/02/16, Decision on Argentina’s Application for Annulment’. Jun. 29, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0776.pdf
[128]
‘2001 International Law Commission’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts with Commentaries’. [Online]. Available: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf
[129]
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Chapter 7’, in Principles of international investment law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[130]
Douglas, Zachary, ‘Chapter 5’, in The international law of investment claims, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14508605270004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[131]
Schreuer, Christoph and International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, The ICSID Convention: a commentary : a commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[132]
‘UNCTAD, “Scope and Definitions” in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20102_en.pdf
[133]
‘1965 Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States’. [Online]. Available: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/ICSID/RulesMain.jsp
[134]
‘1990 UK-Argentina BIT’. [Online]. Available: http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/uk_argentina.pdf
[135]
‘1991 US-Argentina BIT’. [Online]. Available: http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/argentina_us.pdf
[136]
Paparinskis, Mārtiņš, ‘1991 Spain-Argentina BIT - art III(1)’, in Basic documents on international investment protection, vol. Documents in international law, Oxford: Hart, 2012.
[137]
D. Krishan, ‘A Notion of ICSID Investment’, 2008. [Online]. Available: http://www.devkrishan.com/Scholarship/mywritings.html
[138]
C. Levesque, ‘Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: The Definition of Investment’, ICSID Review, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 247–254, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1093/icsidreview/sis023.
[139]
L. A. Mistelis, ‘Award as an Investment: The Value of an Arbitral Award or the Cost of Non-Enforcement’, ICSID Review, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 64–87, May 2013, doi: 10.1093/icsidreview/sis035.
[140]
Mortenson, Julian Davis, ‘Meaning of Investment: ICSID’s Travaux and the Domain of International Investment Law, The’, Harvard International Law Journal, vol. 51, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=257&handle=hein.journals%252Fhilj51&collection=journals#259
[141]
‘Ambiente Ufficio SpA et al v Argentina, ICSID Case no’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1276.pdf
[142]
‘Dissenting Opinion by Arbitrator Torres Bernárdez’. May 02, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1487.pdf
[143]
‘Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v Tanzania, ICSID Case no ARB/05/22, Award’. Jul. 24, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf
[144]
‘Deutche Bank AG v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/09/2, Award’. Oct. 31, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1272.pdf
[145]
‘Fedax NV v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB/96/3, Award’. Mar. 03, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0316_0.pdf
[146]
‘Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v Philippines, ICSID Case no ARB/03/25, Award’. Aug. 16, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0340.pdf
[147]
‘GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft v Ukraine, ICSID Case no ARB/08/16, Award’. Mar. 31, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0356.pdf
[148]
‘Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v El Salvador, ICSID Case no ARB/03/26, Award’. Aug. 02, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0424_0.pdf
[149]
‘Patrick Mitchell v Congo, ICSID Case no ARB/99/7, Decision on the Application for Annulment of the Award’. Nov. 01, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0537.pdf
[150]
‘Philip Morris et al v Uruguay, ICSID Case no ARB/10/7, Decision on Jurisdiction’. Jul. 02, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1531.pdf
[151]
‘Vanessa Ventures Ltd v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/04/6, Award, 16 January 2013’. Jan. 16, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1250.pdf
[152]
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Chapters 6 and 8’, in Principles of international investment law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[153]
Douglas, Zachary, ‘Chapters 7-8’, in The international law of investment claims, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14508605270004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[154]
Nick Gallus, ‘Recent Bit Decisions and Composite Acts Straddling the Date a Treaty Comes into Force’, The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 491–513, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4498087
[155]
‘UNCTAD, “Scope and Definitions” in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20102_en.pdf
[156]
‘Apotex Inc. v US, UNCITRAL Case, 14 June 2013, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1550.pdf
[157]
‘Hussein Nuaman Soufraki v UAE, ICSID Case no ARB/02/7, Award, 7 July 2004’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0799.pdf
[158]
‘Ioan Micula et al v Romania, ICSID Case no ARB/05/20, Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 24 September 2008’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0530.pdf
[159]
‘- Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award, 26 June 2003’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf
[160]
‘- Rompetrol Group v Romania, ICSID Case no ARB/06/3, Decision on Respondent’s Preliminary Objections to Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 18 April 2008’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0717.pdf
[161]
‘Teinver SA et al v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/09/1, Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 December 2012’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1090.pdf
[162]
‘Tidewater Inc. et al v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB/10/5, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2013’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1277.pdf
[163]
‘Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’. [Online]. Available: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf
[164]
‘2001 International Law Commission’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’. [Online]. Available: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%2520articles/9_6_2001.pdf
[165]
Gallus, Nick and British Institute of International and Comparative Law, The temporal scope of investment protection treaties. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy11pdf03/2010286470.html
[166]
Schreuer, Christoph and International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, The ICSID Convention: a commentary : a commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
[167]
‘Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain) (New Application: 1962) (Judgment) [1970] ICJ Rep 4’. [Online]. Available: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/50/5387.pdf
[168]
‘Bayview Irrigation Distict et al v Mexico, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/05/1, Award, 19 June 2007’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0800.pdf
[169]
‘Certain Property (Liechtenstein v Germany) (Preliminary Objections) [2005] ICJ Rep 6’. [Online]. Available: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/123/8234.pdf
[170]
‘Hussein Nuaman Soufraki v UAE, ICSID Case no ARB/02/7, Decision of the ad hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of Mr Soufraki, 5 June 2007’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0800.pdf
[171]
‘Mobile Corporation, Venezuela Holdings, BV et al v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB/07/27, Decision on Jurisdiction, 10 June 2010’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0538.pdf
[172]
‘Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award, 17 March 2006’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf
[173]
‘Tokio Tokelés v Ukraine, ICSID Case no ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 April 2004’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0863.pdf
[174]
‘Dissenting Opinion by Chairman Weil’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0864.pdf
[175]
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Chapter 13’, in Principles of international investment law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[176]
J. Paulsson, ‘Indirect Expropriation: Is the Right to Regulate at Risk?’ 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/internationalinvestmentagreements/36055332.pdf
[177]
Steven R. Ratner, ‘Regulatory Takings in Institutional Context: Beyond the Fear of Fragmented International Law’, The American Journal of International Law, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 475–528, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20456640
[178]
UNCTAD, ‘'Expropriation’ in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II’. 2012 [Online]. Available: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d7_en.pdf
[179]
‘ADC Affiliate Limited and ADC & ADMC Management Limited v. The Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case no ARB/03/16, Award’. Oct. 02, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0006.pdf
[180]
‘Burlington Resources Inc. v Ecuador, ICSID Case no ARB/08/5, Decision on Liability, 14 December 2012’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1094_0.pdf
[181]
‘Electrabel SA v Hungary, ICSID Case no ARB/07/19, Decision on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law and Liability, 30 November 2012’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1071clean.pdf
[182]
‘Metalclad Corp. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf
[183]
‘Methanex Corporation v US, UNCITRAL Case, Final Award, 3 August 2005’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf
[184]
‘Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed SA (Spain) v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf
[185]
‘2012 US Model Bilateral Investment Treaty’. [Online]. Available: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf
[186]
Christie, G. C., ‘What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law’, British Year Book of International Law, vol. 38, 1962 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/byrint38&id=313&collection=journals&index=journals/byrint#313
[187]
Rudolf Dolzer, ‘New Foundations of the Law of Expropriation of Alien Property’, The American Journal of International Law, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 553–589, 1981 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2200686
[188]
R. Higgins, ‘The taking of property by the state : recent developments in international law’, in Recueil des Cours, Collected Courses, Volume 176 (2007), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1982, pp. 259–392 [Online]. Available: http://www.nijhoffonline.nl/book?id=er176_er176_259-392
[189]
Maurice Mendelson, ‘Bail-ins and the International Investment Law of Expropriation: in and beyond Cyprus’, Journal of International Banking & Financial Law, vol. 28, no. 8, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T18461728966&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T18461728968&backKey=20_T18461728969&csi=280100&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0
[190]
A. Newcombe, ‘The Boundaries of Regulatory Expropriation in International Law’, ICSID Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 1–57, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1093/icsidreview/20.1.1.
[191]
M. Paparinskis, ‘Regulatory Expropriation and Sustainable Developments’, in Sustainable development in world investment law, vol. Global trade law series, Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010.
[192]
A. Reinisch, ‘Expropriation’, in The Oxford handbook of international investment law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp. 407–458 [Online]. Available: https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/42604/chapter/357546997
[193]
A. Reinisch, ‘2) Legality of Expropriation’, in Standards of Investment Protection, A. Reinisch, Ed. Oxford University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547432.001.0001/acprof-9780199547432
[194]
W. M. Reisman and R. D. Sloane, ‘Indirect Exproprion and Its Valuation in the Bit Generation’, British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 115–150, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1093/bybil/74.1.115.
[195]
Mavluda Sattorova, ‘Judicial expropriation or denial of justice? A note on Saipem v Bangladesh’, International Arbitration Law ReviewCase Comment, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 35–41, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/IEECA537049CB11DFB22484C1B1BFCC5F/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
[196]
‘Bernardus Henricus Funnekotter et al v Zimbabwe, ICSID Case no ARB/05/6, Award, 22 April 2009’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0349.pdf
[197]
‘Deutche Bank AG v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/09/2, Award, 31 October 2012’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1272.pdf
[198]
‘Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award, 17 March 2006’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf
[199]
‘Vanessa Ventures Ltd v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/04/6, Award, 16 January 2013’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1250.pdf
[200]
‘Waste Management v Mexico (II), ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/00/3, Award, 30 April 2004’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0900.pdf
[201]
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, Principles of international investment law, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://opil-ouplaw-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/10.1093/law/9780199651795.001.0001/law-9780199651795
[202]
UNCTAD, ‘“Fair and Equitable Treatment” in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II’. 2012 [Online]. Available: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d7_en.pdf
[203]
‘Asian Agricultural Products Ltd (AAPL) v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/87/3, Final Award, 27 June 1990’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf
[204]
‘Chevron et al v Ecuador, UNCITRAL, PCA Case no 34877, Partial Award on the Merits, 30 March 2010’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0151.pdf
[205]
‘Deutche Bank AG v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/09/2, Award, 31 October 2012’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1272.pdf
[206]
‘Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award, 26 June 2003’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf
[207]
‘Occidental Petroleum Corporation et al v Ecuador, Award, ICSID Case no ARB/06/11, 5 October 2012’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1094.pdf
[208]
‘Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award, 17 March 2006’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf
[209]
‘Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed SA (Spain) v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf
[210]
‘Waste Management v Mexico (II), ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/00/3, Award, 30 April 2004’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0900.pdf
[211]
Bjorklund, Andrea K., ‘Reconciling State Sovereignty and Investor Protection in Denial of Justice Claims’, Virginia Journal of International Law, vol. 45, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vajint45&id=819&collection=journals&index=journals/vajint#819
[212]
A. Diehl, ‘Part II Chapter 3’, in The core standard of international investment protection: fair and equitable treatment, vol. International arbitration law library, Alphen Aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2012.
[213]
M. Paparinskis, ‘Chapter 8 (on denial of justice) and Chapter 9 (on investment mistreatment under fair and equitable treatment other than denial of justice)’, in The international minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment, vol. Oxford monographs in international law, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14503354470004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[214]
J. Paulsson, ‘Chapters 4-7’, in Denial of justice in international law, vol. Hersch Lauterpacht memorial lectures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
[215]
M. Potesta, ‘Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law: Understanding the Roots and the Limits of a Controversial Concept’, ICSID Review, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 88–122, May 2013, doi: 10.1093/icsidreview/sis034.
[216]
C. Schreuer, ‘Full Protection and Security’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 353–369, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1093/jnlids/idq002.
[217]
‘Apotex Inc. v US, UNCITRAL Case, 14 June 2013, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1550.pdf
[218]
‘Franck Charles Arif v Moldova, ICSID Case no ARB/11/23, Award, 8 April 2013’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1370.pdf
[219]
‘Parkerings-Compagniet AS v. Republic of Lithuania, ICSID Case no ARB/05/8, Award, 11 September 2007’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0619.pdf
[220]
‘Rompetrol Group v Romania, ICSID Case no ARB/06/3, Award, 6 May 2013’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1408.pdf
[221]
‘Vanessa Ventures Ltd v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/04/6, Award, 16 January 2013’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1250.pdf
[222]
‘White Industries Ltd v India, UNCITRAL Case, Final Award, 30 November 2011’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0906.pdf
[223]
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Chapter 14, p. 19-20’, in Principles of international investment law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[224]
M. Paparinskis, ‘MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving beyond Maffezini and Plama?’, ICSID Review, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 14–58, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1093/icsidreview/26.2.14.
[225]
DiMascio, Nicholas, ‘Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin’, American Journal of International Law, vol. 102, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=48&handle=hein.journals%252Fajil102&collection=journals#56
[226]
A. Sinclair, ‘The Umbrella Clause Debate’, in Investment treaty law: current issues, III: Remedies in international investment law, Emerging jurisprudence of international investment law, London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2009.
[227]
‘Corn Products, International, Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/1, Decision on Responsibility, 15 January 2008’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0244.pdf
[228]
‘CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/01/8, Decision of the ad hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 25 September 2007’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0187.pdf
[229]
‘Eimilio Augustín Maffezini v Spain, ICSID Case no ARB/97/7, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf
[230]
‘Impregilo SpA v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/07/17, Award, Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of Arbitrator Stern, 21 June 2011’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0420.pdf
[231]
‘Methanex Corporation v US, UNCITRAL Case, Final Award, 3 August 2005’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf
[232]
‘MTD Equity Sdn Bhd et al v Chile, ICSID Case no ARB/01/7, Decision on Annulment, 21 March 2007’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0546.pdf
[233]
‘Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA Case no UN3467, Final Award, 1 July 2004’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf
[234]
‘Plama Consortium Limited v Bulgaria, ICSID Case no ARB/03/24, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf
[235]
‘SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Philippines (SGS II), ICSID Case no ARB/02/6, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0782.pdf
[236]
A. Bjorklund, ‘National Treatment’, in Standards of Investment Protection, A. Reinisch, Ed. Oxford University Press, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547432.001.0001/acprof-9780199547432
[237]
Z. Douglas, ‘1) The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 97–113, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1093/jnlids/idq015.
[238]
Douglas, Zachary, ‘2) Chapter 9’, in The international law of investment claims, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14508605270004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[239]
N. Gallus, ‘An Umbrella just for Two? BIT Obligations Observance Clauses and the Parties to a Contract’, Arbitration International, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 157–170 [Online]. Available: http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document.aspx?id=ipn28355
[240]
S. W. Schill, ‘Allocating Adjudicatory Authority: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction--A Reply to Zachary Douglas’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 353–371, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1093/jnlids/idr004.
[241]
‘UNCTAD, “Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment” in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II’. [Online]. Available: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20101_en.pdf
[242]
F. Orrego Vicuna, ‘Reports of [Maffezini’s] demise have been greatly exaggerated’, Journal of International Dispute Settlement, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 299–327, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1093/jnlids/ids004.
[243]
‘BIVAC v Paraguay, ICSID Case no ARB/07/9, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 29 May 2009’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0103.pdf
[244]
‘Further Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 9 October 2012’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1109.pdf
[245]
‘Hochtief AG v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/07/31, Decision on Jurisdiction, 24 October 2011’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0405.pdf
[246]
‘ICS Inspection and Control Services Limited (UK) v Argentina, UNCITRAL, PCA Case no 2010-9, Award on Jurisdiction, 10 February 2012’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0416.pdf
[247]
‘SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Pakistan (SGS I), ICSID Case no ARB/01/13, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 6 August 2003’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0779.pdf
[248]
‘SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Paraguay (SGS III), ICSID Case no ARB/01/13, Decision on Jurisdiction, 12 February 2010’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1526.pdf
[249]
‘and Award, 10 February 2012’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1525.pdf
[250]
‘SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Philippines (SGS II), ICSID Case no ARB/02/6, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004, Declaration of Arbirator Crivellaro’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0783.pdf
[251]
Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph, ‘Chapter 16’, in Principles of international investment law, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[252]
Douglas, Zachary, ‘Chapter 13’, in The international law of investment claims, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14508605270004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
[253]
J. Kurtz, ‘ADJUDGING THE EXCEPTIONAL AT INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW: SECURITY, PUBLIC ORDER AND FINANCIAL CRISIS’, International and Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 59, no. 02, pp. 325–371, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1017/S0020589310000047.
[254]
M. Paparinskis, ‘Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures’, British Yearbook of International Law, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 264–352, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1093/bybil/79.1.264.
[255]
‘BG Group Plc v Argentina, UNCITRAL, Final Award, 24 December 2007’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0081.pdf
[256]
‘Burlington Resources Inc. v Ecuador, ICSID Case no ARB/08/5, Decision on Jurisdiction, 2 June 2010’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0106.pdf
[257]
‘Continental Casualty Company v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/03/9, Award, 5 September 2008’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0228.pdf
[258]
‘Pac Rim Cayman LLC v El Salvador, ICSID Case no ARB/09/12, Decision on the Respondent’s Jurisdictional Objections, 1 June 2012’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0935.pdf
[259]
‘Plama Consortium Limited v Bulgaria, ICSID Case no ARB/03/24, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf
[260]
‘1991 US-Argentina BIT’. [Online]. Available: http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/argentina_us.pdf
[261]
‘2004 Canada Model Bilateral Investment Treaty’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/documents/Canadian2004-FIPA-model-en.pdf
[262]
‘2012 US Model Bilateral Investment Treaty’. [Online]. Available: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf
[263]
J. Alvarez and K. Khamsi, ‘The Argentine Crisis and Foreign Investors: A Glimpse into the Heart of the Investment Regime’, in Yearbook on international investment law & policy, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.vcc.columbia.edu/pubs/documents/Alvarez-final_000.pdf
[264]
C. Binder, ‘Changed Circumstances in Investment Law: Interfaces between the Law of Treaties and the Law of State Responsibility with a Special Focus on the Argentine Crisis’, in International investment law for the 21st century essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer, Oxford University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9930966404504761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,International%20investment%20law%20for%20the%2021st%20century:%20essays%20in%20honour%20of%20Christoph%20Schreuer&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9011823993333656972&offset=0
[265]
M. Paparinskis, ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility’, European Journal of International Law, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 617–647, May 2013, doi: 10.1093/ejil/cht025.
[266]
‘Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company v Meico, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/02/1, Decision on Preliminary Question, 17 July 2003’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0330_0.pdf
[267]
‘Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA Case no UN3467, Final Award, 1 July 2004’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf
[268]
‘Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v Russia, PCA Case no AA 227, Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 30 November 2009’. [Online]. Available: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0910.pdf
