2.
ICSID - International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes, https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=ShowHome&pageName=Cases_Home.
3.
Cases - PCA, http://pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=1029.
4.
Energy Charter: Investor-State Disputes, http://www.encharter.org/index.php?id=213.
5.
List of All Cases International Court of Justice, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=2.
6.
Permanent Court of International Justice, http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/index.php?p1=9.
7.
Reports of International Arbitral Awards, http://www.un.org/law/riaa/.
8.
Investment Claims, http://oxia.ouplaw.com/home/ic.
9.
NAFTA Claims, http://www.naftaclaims.com./.
10.
Paparinskis, Mārtiņš: Basic documents on international investment protection. Hart, Oxford (2012).
11.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph: Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
12.
Lowe, A. V.: International law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
13.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph: Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
14.
Crawford, J.: Continuity and Discontinuity in International Dispute Settlement: An Inaugural Lecture. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 1, 3–24 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idp001.
15.
Paparinskis, M.: Introduction. In: Basic documents on international investment protection. pp. 3–12. Hart, Oxford (2012).
16.
Vandevelde, Kenneth J.: Brief History of International Investment Agreements, A. U.C. Davis Journal of International Law & Policy. 12, (2005).
17.
Asian Agricultural Products Ltd (AAPL) v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/87/3, Final Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf, (1990).
18.
Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Guinea v DRC) (Preliminary Objections) [2007] ICJ Rep 582.
19.
Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Guinea v DRC) (Judgment: Merits) [2010] ICJ Rep 639, Joint Dissenting Opinion of Judges Al-Khasawneh and Yusuf 700, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/103/16244.pdf.
20.
Franck Charles Arif v Moldova, ICSID Case no ARB/11/23, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1370.pdf, (2013).
21.
Philip Morris et al v Uruguay, ICSID Case no ARB/10/7, Decision on Jurisdiction, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1531.pdf, (2013).
22.
1967 OECD Draft Convention on the Protection of Foreign Property, http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/oecdworkoninternationalinvestmentlaw.htm.
23.
1991 US-Argentina BIT, http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/argentina_us.pdf, (1991).
24.
2006 International Law Commission’s Articles on Diplomatic Protection, http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%20articles/9_8_2006.pdf.
25.
Lowe, V.: Changing Dimensions of International Investment Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2007). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.970727.
26.
Newcombe, Andrew, Paradell, Lluís: Chapter 1 of Law and practice of investment treaties. In: Law and practice of investment treaties: standards of treatment. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn (2009).
27.
Paparinskis, Mārtiņš: Chapters 1-3. In: The international minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
28.
Parra, A.R.: The History of ICSID. Oxford University Press (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660568.001.0001.
29.
Pauwelyn, J.: At the Edge of Chaos? Emergence and Change in International Investment Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2013). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2271869.
30.
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain) (New Application: 1962) (Judgment) [1970] ICJ Rep 4, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/50/5387.pdf.
31.
- Elettronica Sicula S.p.A. (ELSI) (US v Italy) [1989] ICJ Rep 15, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/76/6707.pdf, (1989).
32.
Tokio Tokelés v Ukraine, ICSID Case no ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0863.pdf, (2004).
33.
1927 Resolution of the Institute of International Law on the International Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigner, http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_96.pdf.
34.
1929 Harvard Draft Convention on the Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigner, http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_96.pdf.
35.
1930 Text of Articles Adopted in First Reading by the Third Committee of the Hague Conference for the Codification of International Law, http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_96.pdf.
36.
1959 Abs-Shawcross Draft Convention on Investment Abroad, http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/Compendium/en/137%2520volume%25205.pdf.
37.
1961 Harvard Draft Convention on the International Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens, http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_217.pdf.
38.
1961 García-Amador’s Revised Draft on International Responsibility of the State for Injuries Caused in its Territory to the Person or Property of Aliens, http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_134_add1.pdf.
39.
1962 UNGA Res 1803 (XVII) Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources, http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/1803%28XVII%29.
40.
1974 UNGA Res 3281 (XXIX) Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, http://www.un-documents.net/a29r3281.htm.
41.
1959 Germany-Pakistan BIT, http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2006/investment_pakistan_germany.pdf.
42.
1965 Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/ICSID/RulesMain.jsp.
43.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph: Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
44.
Douglas, Z.: 1) The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration. British Year Book of International Law. 74, (2003). https://doi.org/151-289 doi:10.1093/bybil/74.1.151.
45.
Douglas, Zachary: 2) Chapter 1. In: The international law of investment claims. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
46.
Gus Van Harten: The Public-Private Distinction in the International Arbitration of Individual Claims against the State. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 56, 371–394 (2007).
47.
Paparinskis, M.: 1) Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility. European Journal of International Law. 24, 617–647 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/cht025.
48.
Paparinskis, M.: 2) Analogies and Other Regimes of International Law by Martins Paparinskis. In: The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice. Oxford University Press (2014).
49.
Reisman, M.: "Case Specific Mandate” versus "Systemic Implications”: How Should Investment Tribunals Decide? Arbitration International. 29, 131–152 (2013).
50.
CLASH OF PARADIGMS: ACTORS AND ANALOGIES SHAPING THE INVESTMENT TREATY SYSTEM. The American Journal of International Law. 107, 45–94 (2013). https://doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.107.1.0045.
51.
Archer Daniel Midlands et al v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/5, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0037_0.pdf, (2007).
52.
Archer Daniel Midlands et al v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/5, Award, Concurring Opinion of Arbitrator Rovine, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0039.pdf.
53.
Burlington Resources Inc. v Ecuador, ICSID Case no ARB/08/5, Decision on Liability, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1094_0.pdf, (2012).
54.
Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf.
55.
Alvarez, J.E.: Chapter II (What are Investment Treaties for?). In: The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment (Pocket Books of the Hague Academy of International Law//Les) [Paperback]. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers / Brill Academic (30 Nov 2011) (2009).
56.
Douglas, Z.: The Enforcement of Environmental Norms in Investment Treaty Arbitration. In: Harnessing foreign investment to promote environmental protection: incentives and safeguards. pp. 418–424. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139344289.
57.
Yackee, Jason Webb: Controlling the International Investment Law Agency. Harvard International Law Journal. 53, (2012).
58.
Paparinskis, M.: The Limits of Depoliticisation in Contemporary Investor-State Arbitration, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1716833.
59.
Pauwelyn, J.: At the Edge of Chaos? Emergence and Change in International Investment Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. (2013). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2271869.
60.
Puig, S.: Emergence and Dynamism in International Organizations: ICSID, Investor-State Arbitration, and International Investment Law. SSRN Journal. (2013).
61.
Salacuse, Jeswald W.: Emerging Global Regime for Investment, The. Harvard International Law Journal. 51, (2010).
62.
Schill, S.W.: 1) The Multilateralization of International Investment Law - Emergence of a Multilateral System of Investment Protection on Bilateral Grounds. Trade, Law and Development. 2, (2010).
63.
Schill, Stephan: 2) The multilateralization of international investment law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
64.
Schill, Stephan W.: Enhancing International Investment Law’s Legitimacy: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations of a New Public Law Approach. Virginia Journal of International Law. 52, (2011).
65.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph: Chapters 3-5. In: Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
66.
Alvarez, Jose E.: Bit on Custom, A. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics. 42, (2009).
67.
McLachlan, Campbell: Investment Treaties and General International Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 57, (2008).
68.
Paulsson, J.: Treaty Arbitration and the Generation of Legal Norms, http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:mU1wo0tzP_gJ:www.biicl.org/files/3055_jan_paulsson_-_treaty_arbitration_and_international_law.doc &cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&client=firefox-a.
69.
Reisman, M.: "Case Specific Mandate” versus "Systemic Implications”: How Should Investment Tribunals Decide? Arbitration International. 29, 131–152 (2013).
70.
Anthea Roberts: POWER AND PERSUASION IN INVESTMENT TREATY INTERPRETATION: The American Journal of International Law. 104, 179–225 (2010).
71.
Paparinskis, M.: EJIL: Talk! – The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment, http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-international-minimum-standard-and-fair-and-equitable-treatment/.
72.
Berman, F.: EJIL: Talk! – The Interpretation and Application of Fair and Equitable Treatment: An Arbitrator’s Perspective, http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-interpretation-and-application-of-fair-and-equitable-treatment-an-arbitrators-perspective/.
73.
Paparinskis, M.: EJIL: Talk! – A Reply to Sir Frank Berman, http://www.ejiltalk.org/a-reply-to-sir-frank-berman/.
74.
Berman, F.: EJIL: Talk! – Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Rejoinder to Martins Paparinskis, http://www.ejiltalk.org/fair-and-equitable-treatment-a-rejoinder-to-martins-paparinskis/.
75.
Ambiente Ufficio SpA et al v Argentina, ICSID Case no, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1276.pdf.
76.
Chemtura Corporation v Canada, UNCITRAL Case, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0149_0.pdf, (2010).
77.
CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/01/8, Decision of the ad hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0187.pdf, (2007).
78.
Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf, (2003).
79.
Railroad Development Corporation v Guatemala, ICSID Case no ARB/07/23, Submission of the US, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0709_0.pdf, (2012).
80.
Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf, (2006).
81.
Statute of the International Court of Justice, http://www.icj-cij.org/documents/index.php?p1=4&p2=2&p3=0#CHAPTER_II.
82.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf.
83.
North American Free Trade Commission’s Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions, http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/NAFTA-Interpr.aspx?lang=eng.
84.
2006 Conclusions of the work of the ILC Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%2520articles/1_9_2006.pdf.
85.
Arsanjani, Mahnoush H.: Interpreting Treaties for the Benefit of Third Parties: The Salvors Doctrine and the Use of Legislative History in Investment Treaties. American Journal of International Law. 104, (2010).
86.
McLachlan, Campbell: Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(C) of the Vienna Convention, The. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 54, (2005).
87.
Nolte, Georg: Treaties and subsequent practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2013).
88.
Paparinskis, M.: Analogies and Other Regimes of International Law. SSRN Journal. (2013).
89.
Paparinskis, M.: 1) Investment Treaty Interpretation and Customary Investment Protection Law: Preliminary Remarks. In: Evolution in investment treaty law and arbitration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011).
90.
Paparinskis, M.: 2) Chapter 6. In: The international minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
91.
Schwebel, Stephen M.: Influence of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Customary International Law, The. American Society of International Law Proceedings. 98, (2004).
92.
Simma, B., Kill, T.: Harmonizing Investment Protection and International Human Rights: First Steps towards a Methodology. In: International investment law for the 21st century: essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
93.
Simma, B.: 2) FOREIGN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION: A PLACE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS? International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 60, 573–596 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589311000224.
94.
Vinuales, J.E.: Foreign Investment and the Environment in International Law: An Ambiguous Relationship. British Yearbook of International Law. 80, 244–332 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/80.1.244.
95.
HICEE BV v Slovakia, UNCITRAL, PCA Case 2009-11, Partial Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0404_0.pdf, (2011).
96.
Rompetrol Group v Romania, ICSID Case no ARB/06/3, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1408.pdf, (2013).
97.
Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v Russia, PCA Case no AA 227, Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0910.pdf, (2009).
98.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph: Chapters 22-23. In: Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
99.
Paparinskis, M.: Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility. European Journal of International Law. 24, 617–647 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/cht025.
100.
2001 International Law Commission’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%2520articles/9_6_2001.pdf.
101.
Crawford, J.: 1) Investment Arbitration and the ILC Articles on State Responsibility. ICSID Review. 25, 127–199 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/25.1.127.
102.
Crawford, James: 2) State responsibility: the general part. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).
103.
Douglas, Z.: Other Specific Regimes of Responsibility: Investment Treaty Arbitration and ICSID. In: The law of international responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
104.
Paparinskis, M.: Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures. British Yearbook of International Law. 79, 264–352 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/79.1.264.
105.
ADC Affiliate Limited and ADC & ADMC Management Limited v. The Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case no ARB/03/16, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0006.pdf, (2006).
106.
Archer Daniel Midlands et al v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/5, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0037_0.pdf, (2007).
107.
Chevron et al v Ecuador, UNCITRAL, PCA Case no 34877, Interim Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0150.pdf, (2008).
108.
CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/01/8, Decision of the ad hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0187.pdf, (2007).
109.
Corn Products, International, Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/1, Decision on Responsibility, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0244.pdf, (2008).
110.
Factory at Chorzow (Germany v Poland) (Merits) [1928] PCIJ Rep Series A no 17, http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_17/54_Usine_de_Chorzow_Fond_Arret.pdf.
111.
Gustav F W Hamester GmbH & Co KG v Ghana, ICSID Case no ARB/07/24, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0396.pdf, (2010).
112.
Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf, (2003).
113.
Crawford, J.: Investment Arbitration and the ILC Articles on State Responsibility. ICSID Review. 25, 127–199 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/25.1.127.
114.
2006 International Law Commission’s Articles on Diplomatic Protection, http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft articles/9_8_2006.pdf.
115.
Crawford, J.: International Protection of Foreign Direct Investments: Between Clinical Isolation and Systemic Integration. In: International investment law and general international law: from clinical isolation to systemic integration? Nomos, Baden-Baden (2011).
116.
Crawford, James: State responsibility: the general part. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013).
117.
Crawford, J.: Treaty and Contract in Investment Arbitration. Arbitration International. 24, 351–374 (2008).
118.
Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, Olleson, Simon: The law of international responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
119.
Douglas, Z.: 1) The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration. British Year Book of International Law. 74, (2003). https://doi.org/151-289 doi:10.1093/bybil/74.1.151.
120.
Douglas, Zachary: 2) Chapter 1. In: The international law of investment claims. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
121.
Paparinskis, M.: Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures. British Yearbook of International Law. 79, 264–352 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/79.1.264.
122.
Archer Daniel Midlands et al v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/5, Award, Concurring Opinion of Arbitrator Rovine, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0039.pdf.
123.
Cargill, Incorporated v Mexico, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/05/2, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0133_0.pdf, (2009).
124.
Corn Products, International, Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/1, Decision on Responsibility, Separate Opinion of Arbitrator Lowenfeld, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0246.pdf.
125.
Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. et al v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/01/3, Decision on Application for Annulment by Argentina, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0299.pdf, (2010).
126.
Mytilineos Holdings SA v Serbia, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award on Jurisdiction, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0549.pdf, (2006).
127.
Sempra Energy International v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/02/16, Decision on Argentina’s Application for Annulment, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0776.pdf, (2010).
128.
2001 International Law Commission’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts with Commentaries, http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf.
129.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph: Chapter 7. In: Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
130.
Douglas, Zachary: Chapter 5. In: The international law of investment claims. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
131.
Schreuer, Christoph, International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes: The ICSID Convention: a commentary : a commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
132.
UNCTAD, ‘Scope and Definitions’ in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20102_en.pdf, (2011).
133.
1965 Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States, https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/ICSID/RulesMain.jsp.
134.
1990 UK-Argentina BIT, http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/uk_argentina.pdf.
135.
1991 US-Argentina BIT, http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/argentina_us.pdf.
136.
Paparinskis, Mārtiņš: 1991 Spain-Argentina BIT - art III(1). In: Basic documents on international investment protection. Hart, Oxford (2012).
137.
Krishan, D.: A Notion of ICSID Investment, http://www.devkrishan.com/Scholarship/mywritings.html.
138.
Levesque, C.: Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: The Definition of Investment. ICSID Review. 27, 247–254 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/sis023.
139.
Mistelis, L.A.: Award as an Investment: The Value of an Arbitral Award or the Cost of Non-Enforcement. ICSID Review. 28, 64–87 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/sis035.
140.
Mortenson, Julian Davis: Meaning of Investment: ICSID’s Travaux and the Domain of International Investment Law, The. Harvard International Law Journal. 51, (2010).
141.
Ambiente Ufficio SpA et al v Argentina, ICSID Case no, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1276.pdf.
142.
Dissenting Opinion by Arbitrator Torres Bernárdez, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1487.pdf, (2013).
143.
Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v Tanzania, ICSID Case no ARB/05/22, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf, (2008).
144.
Deutche Bank AG v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/09/2, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1272.pdf, (2012).
145.
Fedax NV v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB/96/3, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0316_0.pdf, (1998).
146.
Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v Philippines, ICSID Case no ARB/03/25, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0340.pdf, (2007).
147.
GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft v Ukraine, ICSID Case no ARB/08/16, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0356.pdf, (2011).
148.
Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v El Salvador, ICSID Case no ARB/03/26, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0424_0.pdf, (2006).
149.
Patrick Mitchell v Congo, ICSID Case no ARB/99/7, Decision on the Application for Annulment of the Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0537.pdf, (2006).
150.
Philip Morris et al v Uruguay, ICSID Case no ARB/10/7, Decision on Jurisdiction, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1531.pdf, (2013).
151.
Vanessa Ventures Ltd v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/04/6, Award, 16 January 2013, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1250.pdf, (2013).
152.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph: Chapters 6 and 8. In: Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
153.
Douglas, Zachary: Chapters 7-8. In: The international law of investment claims. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
154.
Nick Gallus: Recent Bit Decisions and Composite Acts Straddling the Date a Treaty Comes into Force. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 56, 491–513 (2007).
155.
UNCTAD, ‘Scope and Definitions’ in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20102_en.pdf, (2011).
156.
Apotex Inc. v US, UNCITRAL Case, 14 June 2013, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1550.pdf.
157.
Hussein Nuaman Soufraki v UAE, ICSID Case no ARB/02/7, Award, 7 July 2004, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0799.pdf.
158.
Ioan Micula et al v Romania, ICSID Case no ARB/05/20, Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 24 September 2008, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0530.pdf.
159.
- Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award, 26 June 2003, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf.
160.
- Rompetrol Group v Romania, ICSID Case no ARB/06/3, Decision on Respondent’s Preliminary Objections to Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 18 April 2008, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0717.pdf.
161.
Teinver SA et al v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/09/1, Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 December 2012, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1090.pdf.
162.
Tidewater Inc. et al v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB/10/5, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2013, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1277.pdf.
163.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf.
164.
2001 International Law Commission’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%2520articles/9_6_2001.pdf.
165.
Gallus, Nick, British Institute of International and Comparative Law: The temporal scope of investment protection treaties. British Institute of International and Comparative Law, London (2008).
166.
Schreuer, Christoph, International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes: The ICSID Convention: a commentary : a commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
167.
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain) (New Application: 1962) (Judgment) [1970] ICJ Rep 4, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/50/5387.pdf.
168.
Bayview Irrigation Distict et al v Mexico, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/05/1, Award, 19 June 2007, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0800.pdf.
169.
Certain Property (Liechtenstein v Germany) (Preliminary Objections) [2005] ICJ Rep 6, http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/123/8234.pdf.
170.
Hussein Nuaman Soufraki v UAE, ICSID Case no ARB/02/7, Decision of the ad hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of Mr Soufraki, 5 June 2007, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0800.pdf.
171.
Mobile Corporation, Venezuela Holdings, BV et al v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB/07/27, Decision on Jurisdiction, 10 June 2010, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0538.pdf.
172.
Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award, 17 March 2006, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf.
173.
Tokio Tokelés v Ukraine, ICSID Case no ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 April 2004, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0863.pdf.
174.
Dissenting Opinion by Chairman Weil, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0864.pdf.
175.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph: Chapter 13. In: Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
176.
Paulsson, J.: Indirect Expropriation: Is the Right to Regulate at Risk?, http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/internationalinvestmentagreements/36055332.pdf, (2005).
177.
Steven R. Ratner: Regulatory Takings in Institutional Context: Beyond the Fear of Fragmented International Law. The American Journal of International Law. 102, 475–528 (2008).
178.
UNCTAD: 'Expropriation’ in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, http://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d7_en.pdf, (2012).
179.
ADC Affiliate Limited and ADC & ADMC Management Limited v. The Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case no ARB/03/16, Award, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0006.pdf, (2006).
180.
Burlington Resources Inc. v Ecuador, ICSID Case no ARB/08/5, Decision on Liability, 14 December 2012, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1094_0.pdf.
181.
Electrabel SA v Hungary, ICSID Case no ARB/07/19, Decision on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law and Liability, 30 November 2012, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1071clean.pdf.
182.
Metalclad Corp. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf.
183.
Methanex Corporation v US, UNCITRAL Case, Final Award, 3 August 2005, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf.
184.
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed SA (Spain) v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf.
185.
2012 US Model Bilateral Investment Treaty, http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf.
186.
Christie, G. C.: What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law. British Year Book of International Law. 38, (1962).
187.
Rudolf Dolzer: New Foundations of the Law of Expropriation of Alien Property. The American Journal of International Law. 75, 553–589 (1981).
188.
Higgins, R.: The taking of property by the state : recent developments in international law. In: Recueil des Cours, Collected Courses, Volume 176 (2007). pp. 259–392. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (1982). https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789024728473.259-392.
189.
Maurice Mendelson: Bail-ins and the International Investment Law of Expropriation: in and beyond Cyprus. Journal of International Banking & Financial Law. 28, (2013).
190.
Newcombe, A.: The Boundaries of Regulatory Expropriation in International Law. ICSID Review. 20, 1–57 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/20.1.1.
191.
Paparinskis, M.: Regulatory Expropriation and Sustainable Developments. In: Sustainable development in world investment law. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn (2010).
192.
Reinisch, A.: Expropriation. In: The Oxford handbook of international investment law. pp. 407–458. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008).
193.
Reinisch, A.: 2) Legality of Expropriation. In: Reinisch, A. (ed.) Standards of Investment Protection. Oxford University Press (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547432.001.0001.
194.
Reisman, W.M., Sloane, R.D.: Indirect Exproprion and Its Valuation in the Bit Generation. British Yearbook of International Law. 74, 115–150 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/74.1.115.
195.
Mavluda Sattorova: Judicial expropriation or denial of justice? A note on Saipem v Bangladesh. International Arbitration Law ReviewCase Comment. 13, 35–41 (2010).
196.
Bernardus Henricus Funnekotter et al v Zimbabwe, ICSID Case no ARB/05/6, Award, 22 April 2009, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0349.pdf.
197.
Deutche Bank AG v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/09/2, Award, 31 October 2012, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1272.pdf.
198.
Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award, 17 March 2006, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf.
199.
Vanessa Ventures Ltd v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/04/6, Award, 16 January 2013, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1250.pdf.
200.
Waste Management v Mexico (II), ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/00/3, Award, 30 April 2004, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0900.pdf.
201.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph: Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
202.
UNCTAD: ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, http://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d7_en.pdf, (2012).
203.
Asian Agricultural Products Ltd (AAPL) v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/87/3, Final Award, 27 June 1990, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf.
204.
Chevron et al v Ecuador, UNCITRAL, PCA Case no 34877, Partial Award on the Merits, 30 March 2010, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0151.pdf.
205.
Deutche Bank AG v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/09/2, Award, 31 October 2012, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1272.pdf.
206.
Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award, 26 June 2003, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf.
207.
Occidental Petroleum Corporation et al v Ecuador, Award, ICSID Case no ARB/06/11, 5 October 2012, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1094.pdf.
208.
Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award, 17 March 2006, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf.
209.
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed SA (Spain) v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf.
210.
Waste Management v Mexico (II), ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/00/3, Award, 30 April 2004, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0900.pdf.
211.
Bjorklund, Andrea K.: Reconciling State Sovereignty and Investor Protection in Denial of Justice Claims. Virginia Journal of International Law. 45, (2004).
212.
Diehl, A.: Part II Chapter 3. In: The core standard of international investment protection: fair and equitable treatment. Wolters Kluwer, Alphen Aan den Rijn (2012).
213.
Paparinskis, M.: Chapter 8 (on denial of justice) and Chapter 9 (on investment mistreatment under fair and equitable treatment other than denial of justice). In: The international minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
214.
Paulsson, J.: Chapters 4-7. In: Denial of justice in international law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
215.
Potesta, M.: Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law: Understanding the Roots and the Limits of a Controversial Concept. ICSID Review. 28, 88–122 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/sis034.
216.
Schreuer, C.: Full Protection and Security. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 1, 353–369 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq002.
217.
Apotex Inc. v US, UNCITRAL Case, 14 June 2013, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1550.pdf.
218.
Franck Charles Arif v Moldova, ICSID Case no ARB/11/23, Award, 8 April 2013, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1370.pdf.
219.
Parkerings-Compagniet AS v. Republic of Lithuania, ICSID Case no ARB/05/8, Award, 11 September 2007, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0619.pdf.
220.
Rompetrol Group v Romania, ICSID Case no ARB/06/3, Award, 6 May 2013, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1408.pdf.
221.
Vanessa Ventures Ltd v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/04/6, Award, 16 January 2013, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1250.pdf.
222.
White Industries Ltd v India, UNCITRAL Case, Final Award, 30 November 2011, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0906.pdf.
223.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph: Chapter 14, p. 19-20. In: Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
224.
Paparinskis, M.: MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving beyond Maffezini and Plama? ICSID Review. 26, 14–58 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/26.2.14.
225.
DiMascio, Nicholas: Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin. American Journal of International Law. 102, (2008).
226.
Sinclair, A.: The Umbrella Clause Debate. In: Investment treaty law: current issues, III: Remedies in international investment law, Emerging jurisprudence of international investment law. British Institute of International and Comparative Law, London (2009).
227.
Corn Products, International, Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/1, Decision on Responsibility, 15 January 2008, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0244.pdf.
228.
CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/01/8, Decision of the ad hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 25 September 2007, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0187.pdf.
229.
Eimilio Augustín Maffezini v Spain, ICSID Case no ARB/97/7, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf.
230.
Impregilo SpA v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/07/17, Award, Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of Arbitrator Stern, 21 June 2011, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0420.pdf.
231.
Methanex Corporation v US, UNCITRAL Case, Final Award, 3 August 2005, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf.
232.
MTD Equity Sdn Bhd et al v Chile, ICSID Case no ARB/01/7, Decision on Annulment, 21 March 2007, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0546.pdf.
233.
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA Case no UN3467, Final Award, 1 July 2004, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf.
234.
Plama Consortium Limited v Bulgaria, ICSID Case no ARB/03/24, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf.
235.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Philippines (SGS II), ICSID Case no ARB/02/6, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0782.pdf.
236.
Bjorklund, A.: National Treatment. In: Reinisch, A. (ed.) Standards of Investment Protection. Oxford University Press (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547432.001.0001.
237.
Douglas, Z.: 1) The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2, 97–113 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idq015.
238.
Douglas, Zachary: 2) Chapter 9. In: The international law of investment claims. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
239.
Gallus, N.: An Umbrella just for Two? BIT Obligations Observance Clauses and the Parties to a Contract. Arbitration International. 24, 157–170.
240.
Schill, S.W.: Allocating Adjudicatory Authority: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction--A Reply to Zachary Douglas. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2, 353–371 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idr004.
241.
UNCTAD, ‘Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment’ in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20101_en.pdf.
242.
Orrego Vicuna, F.: Reports of [Maffezini’s] demise have been greatly exaggerated. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 3, 299–327 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/ids004.
243.
BIVAC v Paraguay, ICSID Case no ARB/07/9, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 29 May 2009, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0103.pdf.
244.
Further Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 9 October 2012, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1109.pdf.
245.
Hochtief AG v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/07/31, Decision on Jurisdiction, 24 October 2011, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0405.pdf.
246.
ICS Inspection and Control Services Limited (UK) v Argentina, UNCITRAL, PCA Case no 2010-9, Award on Jurisdiction, 10 February 2012, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0416.pdf.
247.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Pakistan (SGS I), ICSID Case no ARB/01/13, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 6 August 2003, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0779.pdf.
248.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Paraguay (SGS III), ICSID Case no ARB/01/13, Decision on Jurisdiction, 12 February 2010, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1526.pdf.
249.
and Award, 10 February 2012, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1525.pdf.
250.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Philippines (SGS II), ICSID Case no ARB/02/6, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004, Declaration of Arbirator Crivellaro, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0783.pdf.
251.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph: Chapter 16. In: Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
252.
Douglas, Zachary: Chapter 13. In: The international law of investment claims. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
253.
Kurtz, J.: ADJUDGING THE EXCEPTIONAL AT INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW: SECURITY, PUBLIC ORDER AND FINANCIAL CRISIS. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 59, 325–371 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589310000047.
254.
Paparinskis, M.: Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures. British Yearbook of International Law. 79, 264–352 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/bybil/79.1.264.
255.
BG Group Plc v Argentina, UNCITRAL, Final Award, 24 December 2007, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0081.pdf.
256.
Burlington Resources Inc. v Ecuador, ICSID Case no ARB/08/5, Decision on Jurisdiction, 2 June 2010, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0106.pdf.
257.
Continental Casualty Company v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/03/9, Award, 5 September 2008, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0228.pdf.
258.
Pac Rim Cayman LLC v El Salvador, ICSID Case no ARB/09/12, Decision on the Respondent’s Jurisdictional Objections, 1 June 2012, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0935.pdf.
259.
Plama Consortium Limited v Bulgaria, ICSID Case no ARB/03/24, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf.
260.
1991 US-Argentina BIT, http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/argentina_us.pdf.
261.
2004 Canada Model Bilateral Investment Treaty, http://italaw.com/documents/Canadian2004-FIPA-model-en.pdf.
262.
2012 US Model Bilateral Investment Treaty, http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf.
263.
Alvarez, J., Khamsi, K.: The Argentine Crisis and Foreign Investors: A Glimpse into the Heart of the Investment Regime. In: Yearbook on international investment law & policy (2008).
264.
Binder, C.: Changed Circumstances in Investment Law: Interfaces between the Law of Treaties and the Law of State Responsibility with a Special Focus on the Argentine Crisis. In: International investment law for the 21st century essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford University Press (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199571345.001.0001.
265.
Paparinskis, M.: Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility. European Journal of International Law. 24, 617–647 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/cht025.
266.
Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company v Meico, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/02/1, Decision on Preliminary Question, 17 July 2003, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0330_0.pdf.
267.
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA Case no UN3467, Final Award, 1 July 2004, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf.
268.
Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v Russia, PCA Case no AA 227, Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 30 November 2009, http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0910.pdf.
