Bibliography for LAWSG088: International Law of Foreign Investment : Robert Volterra BETA

‘1927 Resolution of the Institute of International Law on the International Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigner’. Web. <http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_96.pdf>.

‘1929 Harvard Draft Convention on the Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigner’. Web. <http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_96.pdf>.

‘1930 Text of Articles Adopted in First Reading by the Third Committee of the Hague Conference for the Codification of International Law’. Web. <http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_96.pdf>.

‘1959 Abs-Shawcross Draft Convention on Investment Abroad’. Web. <http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/Compendium/en/137%2520volume%25205.pdf>.

‘1959 Germany-Pakistan BIT’. Web. <http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2006/investment_pakistan_germany.pdf>.

‘1961 García-Amador’s Revised Draft on International Responsibility of the State for Injuries Caused in Its Territory to the Person or Property of Aliens’. Web. <http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_134_add1.pdf>.

‘1961 Harvard Draft Convention on the International Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens’. Web. <http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_217.pdf>.

‘1962 UNGA Res 1803 (XVII) Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/1803%28XVII%29>.

‘1965 Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/ICSID/RulesMain.jsp>.

‘---’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/ICSID/RulesMain.jsp>.

‘1967 OECD Draft Convention on the Protection of Foreign Property’. N.p., 1967. Web. <http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/oecdworkoninternationalinvestmentlaw.htm>.

‘1974 UNGA Res 3281 (XXIX) Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.un-documents.net/a29r3281.htm>.

‘1990 UK-Argentina BIT’. Web. <http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/uk_argentina.pdf>.

‘1991 US-Argentina BIT’. 1991. Web. <http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/argentina_us.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/argentina_us.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/argentina_us.pdf>.

‘2001 International Law Commission’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’. Web. <http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%2520articles/9_6_2001.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%2520articles/9_6_2001.pdf>.

‘2001 International Law Commission’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts with Commentaries’. Web. <http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf>.

‘2004 Canada Model Bilateral Investment Treaty’. Web. <http://italaw.com/documents/Canadian2004-FIPA-model-en.pdf>.

‘2006 Conclusions of the Work of the ILC Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law’. Web. <http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%2520articles/1_9_2006.pdf>.

‘2006 International Law Commission’s Articles on Diplomatic Protection’. Web. <http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%20articles/9_8_2006.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft articles/9_8_2006.pdf>.

‘2012 US Model Bilateral Investment Treaty’. Web. <http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf>.

‘ADC Affiliate Limited and ADC & ADMC Management Limited v. The Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case No ARB/03/16, Award’. 2 Oct. 2006. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0006.pdf>.

‘---’. 2 Oct. 2006. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0006.pdf>.

‘Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Guinea v DRC) (Judgment: Merits) [2010] ICJ Rep 639, Joint Dissenting Opinion of Judges Al-Khasawneh and Yusuf 700’. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/103/16244.pdf>.

‘Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Guinea v DRC) (Preliminary Objections) [2007] ICJ Rep 582’. : n. pag. Print.

Alvarez, J., and K. Khamsi. ‘The Argentine Crisis and Foreign Investors: A Glimpse into the Heart of the Investment Regime’. Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy. N.p., 2008. Web. <http://www.vcc.columbia.edu/pubs/documents/Alvarez-final_000.pdf>.

Alvarez, Jose E. ‘Bit on Custom, A’. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 42 (2009): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nyuilp42&id=21&collection=journals&index=journals/nyuilp>.

Alvarez, José E. ‘Chapter II (What Are Investment Treaties For?)’. The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment (Pocket Books of the Hague Academy of International Law//Les) [Paperback]. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers / Brill Academic (30 Nov 2011), 2009. Web. <http://www.amazon.co.uk/Public-International-Governing-Investment-Academy/dp/9004186824/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1382438886&sr=8-1&keywords=Public+International+Law+Regime+Governing+International+Investment>.

‘Ambiente Ufficio SpA et al v Argentina, ICSID Case No’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1276.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1276.pdf>.

‘And Award, 10 February 2012’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1525.pdf>.

Anthea Roberts. ‘POWER AND PERSUASION IN INVESTMENT TREATY INTERPRETATION’: The American Journal of International Law 104.2 (2010): 179–225. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5305/amerjintelaw.104.2.0179>.

‘Apotex Inc. v US, UNCITRAL Case, 14 June 2013, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1550.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1550.pdf>.

‘Archer Daniel Midlands et al v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case No ARB(AF)/04/5, Award’. 21 Nov. 2007. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0037_0.pdf>.

‘---’. 21 Nov. 2007. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0037_0.pdf>.

‘Archer Daniel Midlands et al v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case No ARB(AF)/04/5, Award, Concurring Opinion of Arbitrator Rovine’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0039.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0039.pdf>.

Arsanjani, Mahnoush H. ‘Interpreting Treaties for the Benefit of Third Parties: The Salvors Doctrine and the Use of Legislative History in Investment Treaties’. American Journal of International Law 104 (2010): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=597&handle=hein.journals%252Fajil104&collection=journals#605>.

‘Asian Agricultural Products Ltd (AAPL) v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No ARB/87/3, Final Award’. 27 June 1990. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf>.

‘Asian Agricultural Products Ltd (AAPL) v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No ARB/87/3, Final Award, 27 June 1990’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf>.

‘Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain) (New Application: 1962) (Judgment) [1970] ICJ Rep 4’. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/50/5387.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/50/5387.pdf>.

‘Bayview Irrigation Distict et al v Mexico, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/05/1, Award, 19 June 2007’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0800.pdf>.

Berman, Frank. ‘EJIL: Talk! – Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Rejoinder to Martins Paparinskis’. N.p., 16 Aug. 2013. Web. <http://www.ejiltalk.org/fair-and-equitable-treatment-a-rejoinder-to-martins-paparinskis/>.

---. ‘EJIL: Talk! – The Interpretation and Application of Fair and Equitable Treatment: An Arbitrator’s Perspective’. N.p., 13 Aug. 2013. Web. <http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-interpretation-and-application-of-fair-and-equitable-treatment-an-arbitrators-perspective/>.

‘Bernardus Henricus Funnekotter et al v Zimbabwe, ICSID Case No ARB/05/6, Award, 22 April 2009’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0349.pdf>.

‘BG Group Plc v Argentina, UNCITRAL, Final Award, 24 December 2007’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0081.pdf>.

Binder, C. ‘Changed Circumstances in Investment Law: Interfaces between the Law of Treaties and the Law of State Responsibility with a Special Focus on the Argentine Crisis’. International Investment Law for the 21st Century Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford University Press, 2009. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9930966404504761&amp;context=L&amp;vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&amp;lang=en&amp;search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&amp;adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&amp;isFrbr=true&amp;tab=Everything&amp;query=any,contains,International%20investment%20law%20for%20the%2021st%20century:%20essays%20in%20honour%20of%20Christoph%20Schreuer&amp;sortby=date_d&amp;facet=frbrgroupid,include,9011823993333656972&amp;offset=0>.

‘BIVAC v Paraguay, ICSID Case No ARB/07/9, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 29 May 2009’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0103.pdf>.

‘Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v Tanzania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/22, Award’. 24 July 2008. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf>.

Bjorklund, A. ‘National Treatment’. Standards of Investment Protection. Ed. August Reinisch. Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547432.001.0001/acprof-9780199547432>.

Bjorklund, Andrea K. ‘Reconciling State Sovereignty and Investor Protection in Denial of Justice Claims’. Virginia Journal of International Law 45 (2004): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vajint45&id=819&collection=journals&index=journals/vajint#819>.

‘Burlington Resources Inc. v Ecuador, ICSID Case No ARB/08/5, Decision on Jurisdiction, 2 June 2010’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0106.pdf>.

‘Burlington Resources Inc. v Ecuador, ICSID Case No ARB/08/5, Decision on Liability’. 14 June 2012. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1094_0.pdf>.

‘Burlington Resources Inc. v Ecuador, ICSID Case No ARB/08/5, Decision on Liability, 14 December 2012’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1094_0.pdf>.

‘Cargill, Incorporated v Mexico, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/05/2, Award’. 18 Sept. 2009. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0133_0.pdf>.

‘Cases - PCA’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=1029>.

‘Certain Property (Liechtenstein v Germany) (Preliminary Objections) [2005] ICJ Rep 6’. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/123/8234.pdf>.

‘Chemtura Corporation v Canada, UNCITRAL Case, Award’. 2 Aug. 2010. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0149_0.pdf>.

‘Chevron et al v Ecuador, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No 34877, Interim Award’. 1 Dec. 2008. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0150.pdf>.

‘Chevron et al v Ecuador, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No 34877, Partial Award on the Merits, 30 March 2010’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0151.pdf>.

Christie, G. C. ‘What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law’. British Year Book of International Law 38 (1962): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/byrint38&id=313&collection=journals&index=journals/byrint#313>.

‘CLASH OF PARADIGMS: ACTORS AND ANALOGIES SHAPING THE INVESTMENT TREATY SYSTEM’. The American Journal of International Law 107.1 (2013): 45–94. Web.

‘CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina, ICSID Case No ARB/01/8, Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic’. 25 Sept. 2007. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0187.pdf>.

‘---’. 25 Sept. 2007. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0187.pdf>.

‘CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina, ICSID Case No ARB/01/8, Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 25 September 2007’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0187.pdf>.

‘Continental Casualty Company v Argentina, ICSID Case No ARB/03/9, Award, 5 September 2008’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0228.pdf>.

‘Corn Products, International, Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case No ARB(AF)/04/1, Decision on Responsibility’. 15 Jan. 2008. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0244.pdf>.

‘Corn Products, International, Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case No ARB(AF)/04/1, Decision on Responsibility, 15 January 2008’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0244.pdf>.

‘Corn Products, International, Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case No ARB(AF)/04/1, Decision on Responsibility, Separate Opinion of Arbitrator Lowenfeld’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0246.pdf>.

Crawford, J. ‘1) Investment Arbitration and the ILC Articles on State Responsibility’. ICSID Review 25.1 (2010): 127–199. Web.

---. ‘Continuity and Discontinuity in International Dispute Settlement: An Inaugural Lecture’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1.1 (2010): 3–24. Web.

---. ‘International Protection of Foreign Direct Investments: Between Clinical Isolation and Systemic Integration’. International Investment Law and General International Law: From Clinical Isolation to Systemic Integration?. 1. Aufl. Schriften zur Europäischen Integration und internationalen Wirtschaftsordnung. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2011. Web. <http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy12pdf01/2011291061.html>.

---. ‘Investment Arbitration and the ILC Articles on State Responsibility’. ICSID Review 25.1 (2010): 127–199. Web.

Crawford, James. 2) State Responsibility: The General Part. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139033060>.

---. State Responsibility: The General Part. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Print.

Crawford, James. ‘Treaty and Contract in Investment Arbitration’. Arbitration International 24.3 (2008): 351–374. Web. <http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn30591>.

Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, and Olleson, Simon. The Law of International Responsibility. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

‘Deutche Bank AG v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No ARB/09/2, Award’. 31 Oct. 2012. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1272.pdf>.

‘Deutche Bank AG v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case No ARB/09/2, Award, 31 October 2012’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1272.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1272.pdf>.

Diehl, A. ‘Part II Chapter 3’. The Core Standard of International Investment Protection: Fair and Equitable Treatment. International arbitration law library. Alphen Aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer, 2012. Print.

DiMascio, Nicholas. ‘Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin’. American Journal of International Law 102 (2008): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=48&handle=hein.journals%252Fajil102&collection=journals#56>.

‘Dissenting Opinion by Arbitrator Torres Bernárdez’. 2 May 2013. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1487.pdf>.

‘Dissenting Opinion by Chairman Weil’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0864.pdf>.

Dolzer, Rudolf and Schreuer, Christoph. ‘Chapter 7’. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14740378850004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. ‘Chapter 13’. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14740378850004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. ‘Chapter 14, p. 19-20’. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14740378850004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. ‘Chapter 16’. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14740378850004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. ‘Chapters 3-5’. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14740378850004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. ‘Chapters 6 and 8’. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14740378850004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. ‘Chapters 22-23’. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14740378850004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14740378850004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://opil-ouplaw-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/10.1093/law/9780199651795.001.0001/law-9780199651795>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://opil-ouplaw-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/10.1093/law/9780199651795.001.0001/law-9780199651795>.

---. Principles of International Investment Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <https://opil-ouplaw-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/10.1093/law/9780199651795.001.0001/law-9780199651795>.

Douglas, Z. ‘1) The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’. British Year Book of International Law 74.1 (2003): n. pag. Web. <http://bybil.oxfordjournals.org/content/74/1/151.full.pdf+html>.

---. ‘1) The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’. British Year Book of International Law 74.1 (2003): n. pag. Web. <http://bybil.oxfordjournals.org/content/74/1/151.full.pdf+html>.

Douglas, Z. ‘1) The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2.1 (2011): 97–113. Web.

---. ‘Other Specific Regimes of Responsibility: Investment Treaty Arbitration and ICSID’. The Law of International Responsibility. Oxford commentaries on international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14503354980004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. ‘The Enforcement of Environmental Norms in Investment Treaty Arbitration’. Harnessing Foreign Investment to Promote Environmental Protection: Incentives and Safeguards. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. 418–424. Web.

Douglas, Zachary. ‘2) Chapter 1’. The International Law of Investment Claims. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14508605270004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. ‘2) Chapter 1’. The International Law of Investment Claims. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14508605270004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. ‘2) Chapter 9’. The International Law of Investment Claims. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14508605270004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. ‘Chapter 5’. The International Law of Investment Claims. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14508605270004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. ‘Chapter 13’. The International Law of Investment Claims. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14508605270004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. ‘Chapters 7-8’. The International Law of Investment Claims. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14508605270004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

‘Eimilio Augustín Maffezini v Spain, ICSID Case No ARB/97/7, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf>.

‘Electrabel SA v Hungary, ICSID Case No ARB/07/19, Decision on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law and Liability, 30 November 2012’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1071clean.pdf>.

‘- Elettronica Sicula S.p.A. (ELSI) (US v Italy) [1989] ICJ Rep 15’. 1989. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/76/6707.pdf>.

‘Energy Charter: Investor-State Disputes’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.encharter.org/index.php?id=213>.

‘Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. et al v Argentina, ICSID Case No ARB/01/3, Decision on Application for Annulment by Argentina’. 30 July 2010. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0299.pdf>.

‘Factory at Chorzow (Germany v Poland) (Merits) [1928] PCIJ Rep Series A No 17’. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_17/54_Usine_de_Chorzow_Fond_Arret.pdf>.

‘Fedax NV v Venezuela, ICSID Case No ARB/96/3, Award’. 3 Mar. 1998. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0316_0.pdf>.

‘Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company v Meico, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/02/1, Decision on Preliminary Question, 17 July 2003’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0330_0.pdf>.

‘Franck Charles Arif v Moldova, ICSID Case No ARB/11/23, Award’. 8 Apr. 2013. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1370.pdf>.

‘Franck Charles Arif v Moldova, ICSID Case No ARB/11/23, Award, 8 April 2013’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1370.pdf>.

‘Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v Philippines, ICSID Case No ARB/03/25, Award’. 16 Aug. 2007. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0340.pdf>.

‘Further Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 9 October 2012’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1109.pdf>.

Gallus, N. ‘An Umbrella Just for Two? BIT Obligations Observance Clauses and the Parties to a Contract’. Arbitration International 24.1 157–170. Web. <http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document.aspx?id=ipn28355>.

Gallus, Nick and British Institute of International and Comparative Law. The Temporal Scope of Investment Protection Treaties. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2008. Web. <http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy11pdf03/2010286470.html>.

‘GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft v Ukraine, ICSID Case No ARB/08/16, Award’. 31 Mar. 2011. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0356.pdf>.

Gus Van Harten. ‘The Public-Private Distinction in the International Arbitration of Individual Claims against the State’. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 56.2 (2007): 371–394. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/4498073>.

‘Gustav F W Hamester GmbH & Co KG v Ghana, ICSID Case No ARB/07/24, Award’. 18 June 2010. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0396.pdf>.

‘HICEE BV v Slovakia, UNCITRAL, PCA Case 2009-11, Partial Award’. 23 May 2011. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0404_0.pdf>.

Higgins, Rosalyn. ‘The Taking of Property by the State : Recent Developments in International Law’. Recueil Des Cours, Collected Courses, Volume 176 (2007). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1982. 259–392. Web. <http://www.nijhoffonline.nl/book?id=er176_er176_259-392>.

‘Hochtief AG v Argentina, ICSID Case No ARB/07/31, Decision on Jurisdiction, 24 October 2011’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0405.pdf>.

‘Hussein Nuaman Soufraki v UAE, ICSID Case No ARB/02/7, Award, 7 July 2004’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0799.pdf>.

‘Hussein Nuaman Soufraki v UAE, ICSID Case No ARB/02/7, Decision of the Ad Hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of Mr Soufraki, 5 June 2007’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0800.pdf>.

‘ICS Inspection and Control Services Limited (UK) v Argentina, UNCITRAL, PCA Case No 2010-9, Award on Jurisdiction, 10 February 2012’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0416.pdf>.

‘ICSID - International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes’. N.p., n.d. Web. <https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=ShowHome&pageName=Cases_Home>.

‘Impregilo SpA v Argentina, ICSID Case No ARB/07/17, Award, Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of Arbitrator Stern, 21 June 2011’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0420.pdf>.

‘Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v El Salvador, ICSID Case No ARB/03/26, Award’. 2 Aug. 2006. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0424_0.pdf>.

‘Investment Claims’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://oxia.ouplaw.com/home/ic>.

‘Ioan Micula et al v Romania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/20, Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 24 September 2008’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0530.pdf>.

Krishan, D. ‘A Notion of ICSID Investment’. N.p., 2008. Web. <http://www.devkrishan.com/Scholarship/mywritings.html>.

Kurtz, Jürgen. ‘ADJUDGING THE EXCEPTIONAL AT INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW: SECURITY, PUBLIC ORDER AND FINANCIAL CRISIS’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 59.02 (2010): 325–371. Web.

Levesque, C. ‘Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: The Definition of Investment’. ICSID Review 27.2 (2012): 247–254. Web.

‘List of All Cases International Court of Justice’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=2>.

‘Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case No ARB(AF)/98/3, Award’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf>.

‘---’. 26 June 2003. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf>.

‘---’. 26 June 2003. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf>.

‘- Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case No ARB(AF)/98/3, Award, 26 June 2003’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf>.

‘Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case No ARB(AF)/98/3, Award, 26 June 2003’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf>.

Lowe, A. V. International Law. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Print.

Lowe, Vaughan. ‘Changing Dimensions of International Investment Law’. SSRN Electronic Journal (2007): n. pag. Web.

Maurice Mendelson. ‘Bail-Ins and the International Investment Law of Expropriation: In and beyond Cyprus’. Journal of International Banking & Financial Law 28.8 (2013): n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T18461728966&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T18461728968&backKey=20_T18461728969&csi=280100&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

Mavluda Sattorova. ‘Judicial Expropriation or Denial of Justice? A Note on Saipem v Bangladesh’. International Arbitration Law ReviewCase Comment 13.2 (2010): 35–41. Web. <https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/IEECA537049CB11DFB22484C1B1BFCC5F/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true>.

McLachlan, Campbell. ‘Investment Treaties and General International Law’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 57 (2008): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=361&handle=hein.journals%252Fincolq57&collection=journals>.

---. ‘Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(C) of the Vienna Convention, The’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54 (2005): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq54&id=289&collection=journals&index=journals/incolq#289>.

‘Metalclad Corp. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case No ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf>.

‘Methanex Corporation v US, UNCITRAL Case, Final Award, 3 August 2005’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf>.

Mistelis, L. A. ‘Award as an Investment: The Value of an Arbitral Award or the Cost of Non-Enforcement’. ICSID Review 28.1 (2013): 64–87. Web.

‘Mobile Corporation, Venezuela Holdings, BV et al v Venezuela, ICSID Case No ARB/07/27, Decision on Jurisdiction, 10 June 2010’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0538.pdf>.

Mortenson, Julian Davis. ‘Meaning of Investment: ICSID’s Travaux and the Domain of International Investment Law, The’. Harvard International Law Journal 51 (2010): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=257&handle=hein.journals%252Fhilj51&collection=journals#259>.

‘MTD Equity Sdn Bhd et al v Chile, ICSID Case No ARB/01/7, Decision on Annulment, 21 March 2007’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0546.pdf>.

‘Mytilineos Holdings SA v Serbia, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award on Jurisdiction’. 8 Sept. 2006. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0549.pdf>.

‘NAFTA Claims’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.naftaclaims.com./>.

Newcombe, A. ‘The Boundaries of Regulatory Expropriation in International Law’. ICSID Review 20.1 (2005): 1–57. Web.

Newcombe, Andrew and Paradell, Lluís. ‘Chapter 1 of Law and Practice of Investment Treaties’. Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2009. Print.

Nick Gallus. ‘Recent Bit Decisions and Composite Acts Straddling the Date a Treaty Comes into Force’. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 56.3 (2007): 491–513. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/4498087>.

Nolte, Georg. Treaties and Subsequent Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Print.

‘North American Free Trade Commission’s Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions’. N.p., 31 July 2001. Web. <http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/NAFTA-Interpr.aspx?lang=eng>.

‘Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA Case No UN3467, Final Award, 1 July 2004’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf>.

‘Occidental Petroleum Corporation et al v Ecuador, Award, ICSID Case No ARB/06/11, 5 October 2012’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1094.pdf>.

Orrego Vicuna, F. ‘Reports of [Maffezini’s] Demise Have Been Greatly Exaggerated’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 3.2 (2012): 299–327. Web.

‘Pac Rim Cayman LLC v El Salvador, ICSID Case No ARB/09/12, Decision on the Respondent’s Jurisdictional Objections, 1 June 2012’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0935.pdf>.

Paparinskis, M. ‘1) Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility’. European Journal of International Law 24.2 (2013): 617–647. Web.

---. ‘1) Investment Treaty Interpretation and Customary Investment Protection Law: Preliminary Remarks’. Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139043809>.

---. ‘2) Chapter 6’. The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment. Oxford monographs in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14503354470004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. ‘Chapter 8 (on Denial of Justice) and Chapter 9 (on Investment Mistreatment under Fair and Equitable Treatment Other than Denial of Justice)’. The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment. Oxford monographs in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14503354470004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

---. ‘Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures’. British Yearbook of International Law 79.1 (2009): 264–352. Web.

---. ‘Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures’. British Yearbook of International Law 79.1 (2009): 264–352. Web.

---. ‘Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures’. British Yearbook of International Law 79.1 (2009): 264–352. Web.

---. ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility’. European Journal of International Law 24.2 (2013): 617–647. Web.

---. ‘Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility’. European Journal of International Law 24.2 (2013): 617–647. Web.

---. ‘MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving beyond Maffezini and Plama?’ ICSID Review 26.2 (2011): 14–58. Web.

---. ‘Regulatory Expropriation and Sustainable Developments’. Sustainable Development in World Investment Law. Global trade law series. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International, 2010. Print.

Paparinskis, Martins. ‘2) Analogies and Other Regimes of International Law by Martins Paparinskis’. The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice. Oxford University Press, 2014. Web. <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2312308>.

Paparinskis, Mārtiņš. ‘1991 Spain-Argentina BIT - Art III(1)’. Basic Documents on International Investment Protection. Documents in international law. Oxford: Hart, 2012. Print.

Paparinskis, Martins. ‘Analogies and Other Regimes of International Law’. SSRN Journal (2013): n. pag. Web. <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2312308>.

Paparinskis, Mārtiņš. Basic Documents on International Investment Protection. Documents in international law. Oxford: Hart, 2012. Print.

---. ‘Chapters 1-3’. The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment. Oxford monographs in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=14503354470004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760&amp;VE=true>.

Paparinskis, Martins. ‘EJIL: Talk! – A Reply to Sir Frank Berman’. N.p., 15 Aug. 2013. Web. <http://www.ejiltalk.org/a-reply-to-sir-frank-berman/>.

---. ‘EJIL: Talk! – The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment’. N.p., 12 Aug. 2013. Web. <http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-international-minimum-standard-and-fair-and-equitable-treatment/>.

Paparinskis, Mārtiņš. ‘Introduction’. Basic Documents on International Investment Protection. Documents in international law. Oxford: Hart, 2012. 3–12. Print.

Paparinskis, Martins. ‘The Limits of Depoliticisation in Contemporary Investor-State Arbitration’. SSRN Journal. N.p., 2010. Web. <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1716833>.

‘Parkerings-Compagniet AS v. Republic of Lithuania, ICSID Case No ARB/05/8, Award, 11 September 2007’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0619.pdf>.

Parra, Antonio R. The History of ICSID. Oxford University Press, 2012. Web. <http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660568.001.0001/acprof-9780199660568>.

‘Patrick Mitchell v Congo, ICSID Case No ARB/99/7, Decision on the Application for Annulment of the Award’. 1 Nov. 2006. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0537.pdf>.

Paulsson, J. ‘Indirect Expropriation: Is the Right to Regulate at Risk?’ 2005. Web. <http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/internationalinvestmentagreements/36055332.pdf>.

---. ‘Treaty Arbitration and the Generation of Legal Norms’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:mU1wo0tzP_gJ:www.biicl.org/files/3055_jan_paulsson_-_treaty_arbitration_and_international_law.doc &cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&client=firefox-a>.

Paulsson, Jan. ‘Chapters 4-7’. Denial of Justice in International Law. Hersch Lauterpacht memorial lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Print.

Pauwelyn, Joost. ‘At the Edge of Chaos? Emergence and Change in International Investment Law’. SSRN Electronic Journal (2013): n. pag. Web.

---. ‘At the Edge of Chaos? Emergence and Change in International Investment Law’. SSRN Electronic Journal (2013): n. pag. Web.

‘Permanent Court of International Justice’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/index.php?p1=9>.

‘Philip Morris et al v Uruguay, ICSID Case No ARB/10/7, Decision on Jurisdiction’. 2 July 2013. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1531.pdf>.

‘---’. 2 July 2013. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1531.pdf>.

‘Plama Consortium Limited v Bulgaria, ICSID Case No ARB/03/24, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf>.

Potesta, M. ‘Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law: Understanding the Roots and the Limits of a Controversial Concept’. ICSID Review 28.1 (2013): 88–122. Web.

Puig, Sergio. ‘Emergence and Dynamism in International Organizations: ICSID, Investor-State Arbitration, and International Investment Law’. SSRN Journal (2013): n. pag. Web. <http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2297219>.

‘Railroad Development Corporation v Guatemala, ICSID Case No ARB/07/23, Submission of the US’. 31 Jan. 2012. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0709_0.pdf>.

Reinisch, A. ‘2) Legality of Expropriation’. Standards of Investment Protection. Ed. August Reinisch. Oxford University Press, 2008. Web. <http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547432.001.0001/acprof-9780199547432>.

---. ‘Expropriation’. The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 407–458. Web. <https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/42604/chapter/357546997>.

Reisman, M. ‘"Case Specific Mandate” versus "Systemic Implications”: How Should Investment Tribunals Decide?’ Arbitration International 29.2 (2013): 131–152. Web. <http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=KLI-KA-ARBI-290201>.

---. ‘"Case Specific Mandate” versus "Systemic Implications”: How Should Investment Tribunals Decide?’ Arbitration International 29.2 (2013): 131–152. Web. <http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=KLI-KA-ARBI-290201>.

Reisman, W. M., and R. D. Sloane. ‘Indirect Exproprion and Its Valuation in the Bit Generation’. British Yearbook of International Law 74.1 (2004): 115–150. Web.

‘Reports of International Arbitral Awards’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.un.org/law/riaa/>.

‘Rompetrol Group v Romania, ICSID Case No ARB/06/3, Award’. 6 May 2013. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1408.pdf>.

‘Rompetrol Group v Romania, ICSID Case No ARB/06/3, Award, 6 May 2013’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1408.pdf>.

‘- Rompetrol Group v Romania, ICSID Case No ARB/06/3, Decision on Respondent’s Preliminary Objections to Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 18 April 2008’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0717.pdf>.

Rudolf Dolzer. ‘New Foundations of the Law of Expropriation of Alien Property’. The American Journal of International Law 75.3 (1981): 553–589. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2200686>.

Salacuse, Jeswald W. ‘Emerging Global Regime for Investment, The’. Harvard International Law Journal 51 (2010): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=427&handle=hein.journals%252Fhilj51&collection=journals#431>.

‘Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award’. 17 Mar. 2006. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf>.

‘Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award, 17 March 2006’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf>.

Schill, S. W. ‘Allocating Adjudicatory Authority: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction--A Reply to Zachary Douglas’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 2.2 (2011): 353–371. Web.

Schill, Stephan. 2) The Multilateralization of International Investment Law. International trade and economic law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Web. <https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605451>.

Schill, Stephan W. ‘1) The Multilateralization of International Investment Law - Emergence of a Multilateral System of Investment Protection on Bilateral Grounds’. Trade, Law and Development 2.1 (2010): n. pag. Web. <http://www.tradelawdevelopment.com/index.php/tld/article/view/2%25281%2529%2520TL%2526D%252059%2520%25282010%2529>.

Schill, Stephan W. ‘Enhancing International Investment Law’s Legitimacy: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations of a New Public Law Approach’. Virginia Journal of International Law 52 (2011): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vajint52&id=62&collection=journals&index=journals/vajint#62>.

Schreuer, C. ‘Full Protection and Security’. Journal of International Dispute Settlement 1.2 (2010): 353–369. Web.

Schreuer, Christoph and International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. The ICSID Convention: A Commentary : A Commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Print.

---. The ICSID Convention: A Commentary : A Commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Print.

Schwebel, Stephen M. ‘Influence of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Customary International Law, The’. American Society of International Law Proceedings 98 (2004): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=27&handle=hein.journals%252Fasilp98&collection=journals#41>.

‘Seminar List’. : n. pag. Print.

‘Sempra Energy International v Argentina, ICSID Case No ARB/02/16, Decision on Argentina’s Application for Annulment’. 29 June 2010. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0776.pdf>.

‘SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Pakistan (SGS I), ICSID Case No ARB/01/13, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 6 August 2003’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0779.pdf>.

‘SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Paraguay (SGS III), ICSID Case No ARB/01/13, Decision on Jurisdiction, 12 February 2010’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1526.pdf>.

‘SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Philippines (SGS II), ICSID Case No ARB/02/6, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0782.pdf>.

‘SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Philippines (SGS II), ICSID Case No ARB/02/6, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004, Declaration of Arbirator Crivellaro’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0783.pdf>.

Simma, B., and T. Kill. ‘Harmonizing Investment Protection and International Human Rights: First Steps towards a Methodology’. International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Web. <https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9930966404504761&amp;context=L&amp;vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&amp;lang=en&amp;search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&amp;adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&amp;isFrbr=true&amp;tab=Everything&amp;query=any,contains,International%20investment%20law%20for%20the%2021st%20century:%20essays%20in%20honour%20of%20Christoph%20Schreuer&amp;sortby=date_d&amp;facet=frbrgroupid,include,9011823993333656972&amp;offset=0>.

Simma, Bruno. ‘2) FOREIGN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION: A PLACE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS?’ International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60.03 (2011): 573–596. Web.

Sinclair, A. ‘The Umbrella Clause Debate’. Investment Treaty Law: Current Issues, III: Remedies in International Investment Law, Emerging Jurisprudence of International Investment Law. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law, 2009. Print.

‘Statute of the International Court of Justice’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.icj-cij.org/documents/index.php?p1=4&p2=2&p3=0#CHAPTER_II>.

Steven R. Ratner. ‘Regulatory Takings in Institutional Context: Beyond the Fear of Fragmented International Law’. The American Journal of International Law 102.3 (2008): 475–528. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20456640>.

‘Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed SA (Spain) v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case No ARB(AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf>.

‘Teinver SA et al v Argentina, ICSID Case No ARB/09/1, Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 December 2012’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1090.pdf>.

‘Tidewater Inc. et al v Venezuela, ICSID Case No ARB/10/5, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2013’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1277.pdf>.

‘Tokio Tokelés v Ukraine, ICSID Case No ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction’. 29 Apr. 2004. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0863.pdf>.

‘Tokio Tokelés v Ukraine, ICSID Case No ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 April 2004’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0863.pdf>.

UNCTAD. ‘'Expropriation’ in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II’. 2012. Web. <http://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d7_en.pdf>.

---. ‘“Fair and Equitable Treatment” in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II’. 2012. Web. <http://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d7_en.pdf>.

‘UNCTAD, “Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment” in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II’. Web. <http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20101_en.pdf>.

‘UNCTAD, “Scope and Definitions” in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II’. 2011. Web. <http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20102_en.pdf>.

‘---’. 2011. Web. <http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20102_en.pdf>.

Vandevelde, Kenneth J. ‘Brief History of International Investment Agreements, A’. U.C. Davis Journal of International Law & Policy 12 (2005): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ucdl12&id=163&collection=journals&index=journals/ucdl#163>.

‘Vanessa Ventures Ltd v Venezuela, ICSID Case No ARB(AF)/04/6, Award, 16 January 2013’. 16 Jan. 2013. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1250.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1250.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1250.pdf>.

‘Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’. Web. <http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf>.

Vinuales, J. E. ‘Foreign Investment and the Environment in International Law: An Ambiguous Relationship’. British Yearbook of International Law 80.1 (2010): 244–332. Web.

‘Waste Management v Mexico (II), ICSID Additional Facility Case No ARB(AF)/00/3, Award, 30 April 2004’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0900.pdf>.

‘---’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0900.pdf>.

‘White Industries Ltd v India, UNCITRAL Case, Final Award, 30 November 2011’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0906.pdf>.

Yackee, Jason Webb. ‘Controlling the International Investment Law Agency’. Harvard International Law Journal 53 (2012): n. pag. Web. <http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hilj53&id=395&collection=journals&index=journals/hilj#395>.

‘Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v Russia, PCA Case No AA 227, Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility’. 30 Nov. 2009. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0910.pdf>.

‘Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v Russia, PCA Case No AA 227, Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 30 November 2009’. Web. <http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0910.pdf>.