2.
ICSID - International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes [Internet]. Available from: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=ShowHome&pageName=Cases_Home
3.
Cases - PCA [Internet]. Available from: http://pca-cpa.org/showpage.asp?pag_id=1029
4.
Energy Charter: Investor-State Disputes [Internet]. Available from: http://www.encharter.org/index.php?id=213
5.
List of All Cases International Court of Justice [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=2
6.
Permanent Court of International Justice [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/index.php?p1=9
7.
Reports of International Arbitral Awards [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org/law/riaa/
8.
Investment Claims [Internet]. Available from: http://oxia.ouplaw.com/home/ic
9.
NAFTA Claims [Internet]. Available from: http://www.naftaclaims.com./
10.
Paparinskis, Mārtiņš. Basic documents on international investment protection. Oxford: Hart; 2012.
11.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
12.
Lowe, A. V. International law. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
13.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://opil-ouplaw-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/10.1093/law/9780199651795.001.0001/law-9780199651795
14.
Crawford J. Continuity and Discontinuity in International Dispute Settlement: An Inaugural Lecture. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2010 Feb 1;1(1):3–24.
15.
Paparinskis M. Introduction. Basic documents on international investment protection. Oxford: Hart; 2012. p. 3–12.
16.
Vandevelde, Kenneth J. Brief History of International Investment Agreements, A. UC Davis Journal of International Law & Policy [Internet]. 2005;12. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ucdl12&id=163&collection=journals&index=journals/ucdl#163
17.
Asian Agricultural Products Ltd (AAPL) v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/87/3, Final Award [Internet]. 1990. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf
18.
Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Guinea v DRC) (Preliminary Objections) [2007] ICJ Rep 582.
19.
Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Guinea v DRC) (Judgment: Merits) [2010] ICJ Rep 639, Joint Dissenting Opinion of Judges Al-Khasawneh and Yusuf 700 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/103/16244.pdf
20.
Franck Charles Arif v Moldova, ICSID Case no ARB/11/23, Award [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1370.pdf
21.
Philip Morris et al v Uruguay, ICSID Case no ARB/10/7, Decision on Jurisdiction [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1531.pdf
22.
1967 OECD Draft Convention on the Protection of Foreign Property [Internet]. 1967. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investment-policy/oecdworkoninternationalinvestmentlaw.htm
23.
1991 US-Argentina BIT [Internet]. 1991. Available from: http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/argentina_us.pdf
24.
2006 International Law Commission’s Articles on Diplomatic Protection [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%20articles/9_8_2006.pdf
25.
Lowe V. Changing Dimensions of International Investment Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2007;
26.
Newcombe, Andrew, Paradell, Lluís. Chapter 1 of Law and practice of investment treaties. Law and practice of investment treaties: standards of treatment. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International; 2009.
27.
Paparinskis, Mārtiņš. Chapters 1-3. The international minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14503354470004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
28.
Parra AR. The History of ICSID [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660568.001.0001/acprof-9780199660568
29.
Pauwelyn J. At the Edge of Chaos? Emergence and Change in International Investment Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2013;
30.
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain) (New Application: 1962) (Judgment) [1970] ICJ Rep 4 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/50/5387.pdf
31.
- Elettronica Sicula S.p.A. (ELSI) (US v Italy) [1989] ICJ Rep 15 [Internet]. 1989. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/76/6707.pdf
32.
Tokio Tokelés v Ukraine, ICSID Case no ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction [Internet]. 2004. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0863.pdf
33.
1927 Resolution of the Institute of International Law on the International Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigner [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_96.pdf
34.
1929 Harvard Draft Convention on the Responsibility of States for Damage Done in Their Territory to the Person or Property of Foreigner [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_96.pdf
35.
1930 Text of Articles Adopted in First Reading by the Third Committee of the Hague Conference for the Codification of International Law [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_96.pdf
36.
1959 Abs-Shawcross Draft Convention on Investment Abroad [Internet]. Available from: http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/Compendium/en/137%2520volume%25205.pdf
37.
1961 Harvard Draft Convention on the International Responsibility of States for Injuries to Aliens [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_217.pdf
38.
1961 García-Amador’s Revised Draft on International Responsibility of the State for Injuries Caused in its Territory to the Person or Property of Aliens [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/documentation/english/a_cn4_134_add1.pdf
39.
1962 UNGA Res 1803 (XVII) Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/1803%28XVII%29
40.
1974 UNGA Res 3281 (XXIX) Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States [Internet]. Available from: http://www.un-documents.net/a29r3281.htm
41.
1959 Germany-Pakistan BIT [Internet]. Available from: http://www.iisd.org/pdf/2006/investment_pakistan_germany.pdf
42.
1965 Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States [Internet]. Available from: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/ICSID/RulesMain.jsp
43.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://opil-ouplaw-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/10.1093/law/9780199651795.001.0001/law-9780199651795
44.
Douglas Z. 1) The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration. British Year Book of International Law [Internet]. 2003;74(1). Available from: http://bybil.oxfordjournals.org/content/74/1/151.full.pdf+html
45.
Douglas, Zachary. 2) Chapter 1. The international law of investment claims [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14508605270004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
46.
Gus Van Harten. The Public-Private Distinction in the International Arbitration of Individual Claims against the State. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2007;56(2):371–394. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4498073
47.
Paparinskis M. 1) Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility. European Journal of International Law. 2013 May 1;24(2):617–647.
48.
Paparinskis M. 2) Analogies and Other Regimes of International Law by Martins Paparinskis. The Foundations of International Investment Law: Bringing Theory into Practice [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2014. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2312308
49.
Reisman M. "Case Specific Mandate” versus "Systemic Implications”: How Should Investment Tribunals Decide? Arbitration International [Internet]. 2013;29(2):131–152. Available from: http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=KLI-KA-ARBI-290201
50.
CLASH OF PARADIGMS: ACTORS AND ANALOGIES SHAPING THE INVESTMENT TREATY SYSTEM. The American Journal of International Law. 2013 Jan;107(1):45–94.
51.
Archer Daniel Midlands et al v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/5, Award [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0037_0.pdf
52.
Archer Daniel Midlands et al v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/5, Award, Concurring Opinion of Arbitrator Rovine [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0039.pdf
53.
Burlington Resources Inc. v Ecuador, ICSID Case no ARB/08/5, Decision on Liability [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1094_0.pdf
54.
Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf
55.
Alvarez JE. Chapter II (What are Investment Treaties for?). The Public International Law Regime Governing International Investment (Pocket Books of the Hague Academy of International Law//Les) [Paperback] [Internet]. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers / Brill Academic (30 Nov 2011); 2009. Available from: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Public-International-Governing-Investment-Academy/dp/9004186824/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1382438886&sr=8-1&keywords=Public+International+Law+Regime+Governing+International+Investment
56.
Douglas Z. The Enforcement of Environmental Norms in Investment Treaty Arbitration. Harnessing foreign investment to promote environmental protection: incentives and safeguards. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 418–424.
57.
Yackee, Jason Webb. Controlling the International Investment Law Agency. Harvard International Law Journal [Internet]. 2012;53. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hilj53&id=395&collection=journals&index=journals/hilj#395
58.
Paparinskis M. The Limits of Depoliticisation in Contemporary Investor-State Arbitration [Internet]. SSRN Journal. 2010. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1716833
59.
Pauwelyn J. At the Edge of Chaos? Emergence and Change in International Investment Law. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2013;
60.
Puig S. Emergence and Dynamism in International Organizations: ICSID, Investor-State Arbitration, and International Investment Law. SSRN Journal [Internet]. 2013; Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2297219
61.
Salacuse, Jeswald W. Emerging Global Regime for Investment, The. Harvard International Law Journal [Internet]. 2010;51. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=427&handle=hein.journals%252Fhilj51&collection=journals#431
62.
Schill SW. 1) The Multilateralization of International Investment Law - Emergence of a Multilateral System of Investment Protection on Bilateral Grounds. Trade, Law and Development [Internet]. 2010;2(1). Available from: http://www.tradelawdevelopment.com/index.php/tld/article/view/2%25281%2529%2520TL%2526D%252059%2520%25282010%2529
63.
Schill, Stephan. 2) The multilateralization of international investment law [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605451
64.
Schill, Stephan W. Enhancing International Investment Law’s Legitimacy: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations of a New Public Law Approach. Virginia Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2011;52. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vajint52&id=62&collection=journals&index=journals/vajint#62
65.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph. Chapters 3-5. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
66.
Alvarez, Jose E. Bit on Custom, A. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics [Internet]. 2009;42. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/nyuilp42&id=21&collection=journals&index=journals/nyuilp
67.
McLachlan, Campbell. Investment Treaties and General International Law. International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2008;57. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=361&handle=hein.journals%252Fincolq57&collection=journals
68.
Paulsson J. Treaty Arbitration and the Generation of Legal Norms [Internet]. Available from: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:mU1wo0tzP_gJ:www.biicl.org/files/3055_jan_paulsson_-_treaty_arbitration_and_international_law.doc &cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&client=firefox-a
69.
Reisman M. "Case Specific Mandate” versus "Systemic Implications”: How Should Investment Tribunals Decide? Arbitration International [Internet]. 2013;29(2):131–152. Available from: http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=KLI-KA-ARBI-290201
70.
Anthea Roberts. POWER AND PERSUASION IN INVESTMENT TREATY INTERPRETATION: The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 2010;104(2):179–225. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5305/amerjintelaw.104.2.0179
71.
Paparinskis M. EJIL: Talk! – The International Minimum Standard and Fair and Equitable Treatment [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-international-minimum-standard-and-fair-and-equitable-treatment/
72.
Berman F. EJIL: Talk! – The Interpretation and Application of Fair and Equitable Treatment: An Arbitrator’s Perspective [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.ejiltalk.org/the-interpretation-and-application-of-fair-and-equitable-treatment-an-arbitrators-perspective/
73.
Paparinskis M. EJIL: Talk! – A Reply to Sir Frank Berman [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.ejiltalk.org/a-reply-to-sir-frank-berman/
74.
Berman F. EJIL: Talk! – Fair and Equitable Treatment: A Rejoinder to Martins Paparinskis [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.ejiltalk.org/fair-and-equitable-treatment-a-rejoinder-to-martins-paparinskis/
75.
Ambiente Ufficio SpA et al v Argentina, ICSID Case no [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1276.pdf
76.
Chemtura Corporation v Canada, UNCITRAL Case, Award [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0149_0.pdf
77.
CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/01/8, Decision of the ad hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0187.pdf
78.
Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf
79.
Railroad Development Corporation v Guatemala, ICSID Case no ARB/07/23, Submission of the US [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0709_0.pdf
80.
Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf
81.
Statute of the International Court of Justice [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/documents/index.php?p1=4&p2=2&p3=0#CHAPTER_II
82.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf
83.
North American Free Trade Commission’s Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions [Internet]. 2001. Available from: http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/topics-domaines/disp-diff/NAFTA-Interpr.aspx?lang=eng
84.
2006 Conclusions of the work of the ILC Study Group on the Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%2520articles/1_9_2006.pdf
85.
Arsanjani, Mahnoush H. Interpreting Treaties for the Benefit of Third Parties: The Salvors Doctrine and the Use of Legislative History in Investment Treaties. American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2010;104. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=597&handle=hein.journals%252Fajil104&collection=journals#605
86.
McLachlan, Campbell. Principle of Systemic Integration and Article 31(3)(C) of the Vienna Convention, The. International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2005;54. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/incolq54&id=289&collection=journals&index=journals/incolq#289
87.
Nolte, Georg. Treaties and subsequent practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.
88.
Paparinskis M. Analogies and Other Regimes of International Law. SSRN Journal [Internet]. 2013; Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2312308
89.
Paparinskis M. 1) Investment Treaty Interpretation and Customary Investment Protection Law: Preliminary Remarks. Evolution in investment treaty law and arbitration [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139043809
90.
Paparinskis M. 2) Chapter 6. The international minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14503354470004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
91.
Schwebel, Stephen M. Influence of Bilateral Investment Treaties on Customary International Law, The. American Society of International Law Proceedings [Internet]. 2004;98. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=27&handle=hein.journals%252Fasilp98&collection=journals#41
92.
Simma B, Kill T. Harmonizing Investment Protection and International Human Rights: First Steps towards a Methodology. International investment law for the 21st century: essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9930966404504761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,International%20investment%20law%20for%20the%2021st%20century:%20essays%20in%20honour%20of%20Christoph%20Schreuer&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9011823993333656972&offset=0
93.
Simma B. 2) FOREIGN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION: A PLACE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS? International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2011 Jul;60(03):573–596.
94.
Vinuales JE. Foreign Investment and the Environment in International Law: An Ambiguous Relationship. British Yearbook of International Law. 2010 Jan 1;80(1):244–332.
95.
HICEE BV v Slovakia, UNCITRAL, PCA Case 2009-11, Partial Award [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0404_0.pdf
96.
Rompetrol Group v Romania, ICSID Case no ARB/06/3, Award [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1408.pdf
97.
Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v Russia, PCA Case no AA 227, Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0910.pdf
98.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph. Chapters 22-23. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
99.
Paparinskis M. Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility. European Journal of International Law. 2013 May 1;24(2):617–647.
100.
2001 International Law Commission’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%2520articles/9_6_2001.pdf
101.
Crawford J. 1) Investment Arbitration and the ILC Articles on State Responsibility. ICSID Review. 2010 Mar 1;25(1):127–199.
102.
Crawford, James. 2) State responsibility: the general part [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139033060
103.
Douglas Z. Other Specific Regimes of Responsibility: Investment Treaty Arbitration and ICSID. The law of international responsibility [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14503354980004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
104.
Paparinskis M. Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures. British Yearbook of International Law. 2009 Jan 1;79(1):264–352.
105.
ADC Affiliate Limited and ADC & ADMC Management Limited v. The Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case no ARB/03/16, Award [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0006.pdf
106.
Archer Daniel Midlands et al v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/5, Award [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0037_0.pdf
107.
Chevron et al v Ecuador, UNCITRAL, PCA Case no 34877, Interim Award [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0150.pdf
108.
CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/01/8, Decision of the ad hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0187.pdf
109.
Corn Products, International, Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/1, Decision on Responsibility [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0244.pdf
110.
Factory at Chorzow (Germany v Poland) (Merits) [1928] PCIJ Rep Series A no 17 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/pcij/serie_A/A_17/54_Usine_de_Chorzow_Fond_Arret.pdf
111.
Gustav F W Hamester GmbH & Co KG v Ghana, ICSID Case no ARB/07/24, Award [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0396.pdf
112.
Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf
113.
Crawford J. Investment Arbitration and the ILC Articles on State Responsibility. ICSID Review. 2010 Mar 1;25(1):127–199.
114.
2006 International Law Commission’s Articles on Diplomatic Protection [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft articles/9_8_2006.pdf
115.
Crawford J. International Protection of Foreign Direct Investments: Between Clinical Isolation and Systemic Integration. International investment law and general international law: from clinical isolation to systemic integration? [Internet]. 1. Aufl. Baden-Baden: Nomos; 2011. Available from: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy12pdf01/2011291061.html
116.
Crawford, James. State responsibility: the general part. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013.
117.
Crawford J. Treaty and Contract in Investment Arbitration. Arbitration International [Internet]. 2008;24(3):351–374. Available from: http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/CommonUI/document.aspx?id=ipn30591
118.
Crawford, James, Pellet, Alain, Olleson, Simon. The law of international responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
119.
Douglas Z. 1) The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration. British Year Book of International Law [Internet]. 2003;74(1). Available from: http://bybil.oxfordjournals.org/content/74/1/151.full.pdf+html
120.
Douglas, Zachary. 2) Chapter 1. The international law of investment claims [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14508605270004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
121.
Paparinskis M. Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures. British Yearbook of International Law. 2009 Jan 1;79(1):264–352.
122.
Archer Daniel Midlands et al v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/5, Award, Concurring Opinion of Arbitrator Rovine [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0039.pdf
123.
Cargill, Incorporated v Mexico, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/05/2, Award [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0133_0.pdf
124.
Corn Products, International, Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/1, Decision on Responsibility, Separate Opinion of Arbitrator Lowenfeld [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0246.pdf
125.
Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. et al v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/01/3, Decision on Application for Annulment by Argentina [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0299.pdf
126.
Mytilineos Holdings SA v Serbia, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award on Jurisdiction [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0549.pdf
127.
Sempra Energy International v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/02/16, Decision on Argentina’s Application for Annulment [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0776.pdf
128.
2001 International Law Commission’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts with Commentaries [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/commentaries/9_6_2001.pdf
129.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph. Chapter 7. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
130.
Douglas, Zachary. Chapter 5. The international law of investment claims [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14508605270004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
131.
Schreuer, Christoph, International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. The ICSID Convention: a commentary : a commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
132.
UNCTAD, ‘Scope and Definitions’ in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20102_en.pdf
133.
1965 Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States [Internet]. Available from: https://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/ICSID/RulesMain.jsp
134.
1990 UK-Argentina BIT [Internet]. Available from: http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/uk_argentina.pdf
135.
1991 US-Argentina BIT [Internet]. Available from: http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/argentina_us.pdf
136.
Paparinskis, Mārtiņš. 1991 Spain-Argentina BIT - art III(1). Basic documents on international investment protection. Oxford: Hart; 2012.
137.
Krishan D. A Notion of ICSID Investment [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.devkrishan.com/Scholarship/mywritings.html
138.
Levesque C. Abaclat and Others v Argentine Republic: The Definition of Investment. ICSID Review. 2012 Dec 1;27(2):247–254.
139.
Mistelis LA. Award as an Investment: The Value of an Arbitral Award or the Cost of Non-Enforcement. ICSID Review. 2013 May 1;28(1):64–87.
140.
Mortenson, Julian Davis. Meaning of Investment: ICSID’s Travaux and the Domain of International Investment Law, The. Harvard International Law Journal [Internet]. 2010;51. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=257&handle=hein.journals%252Fhilj51&collection=journals#259
141.
Ambiente Ufficio SpA et al v Argentina, ICSID Case no [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1276.pdf
142.
Dissenting Opinion by Arbitrator Torres Bernárdez [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1487.pdf
143.
Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Ltd. v Tanzania, ICSID Case no ARB/05/22, Award [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0095.pdf
144.
Deutche Bank AG v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/09/2, Award [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1272.pdf
145.
Fedax NV v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB/96/3, Award [Internet]. 1998. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0316_0.pdf
146.
Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v Philippines, ICSID Case no ARB/03/25, Award [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0340.pdf
147.
GEA Group Aktiengesellschaft v Ukraine, ICSID Case no ARB/08/16, Award [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0356.pdf
148.
Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v El Salvador, ICSID Case no ARB/03/26, Award [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0424_0.pdf
149.
Patrick Mitchell v Congo, ICSID Case no ARB/99/7, Decision on the Application for Annulment of the Award [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0537.pdf
150.
Philip Morris et al v Uruguay, ICSID Case no ARB/10/7, Decision on Jurisdiction [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1531.pdf
151.
Vanessa Ventures Ltd v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/04/6, Award, 16 January 2013 [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1250.pdf
152.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph. Chapters 6 and 8. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
153.
Douglas, Zachary. Chapters 7-8. The international law of investment claims [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14508605270004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
154.
Nick Gallus. Recent Bit Decisions and Composite Acts Straddling the Date a Treaty Comes into Force. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge University Press; 2007;56(3):491–513. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4498087
155.
UNCTAD, ‘Scope and Definitions’ in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20102_en.pdf
156.
Apotex Inc. v US, UNCITRAL Case, 14 June 2013, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1550.pdf
157.
Hussein Nuaman Soufraki v UAE, ICSID Case no ARB/02/7, Award, 7 July 2004 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0799.pdf
158.
Ioan Micula et al v Romania, ICSID Case no ARB/05/20, Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 24 September 2008 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0530.pdf
159.
- Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award, 26 June 2003 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf
160.
- Rompetrol Group v Romania, ICSID Case no ARB/06/3, Decision on Respondent’s Preliminary Objections to Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 18 April 2008 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0717.pdf
161.
Teinver SA et al v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/09/1, Decision on Jurisdiction, 21 December 2012 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1090.pdf
162.
Tidewater Inc. et al v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB/10/5, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2013 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1277.pdf
163.
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf
164.
2001 International Law Commission’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts [Internet]. Available from: http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%2520articles/9_6_2001.pdf
165.
Gallus, Nick, British Institute of International and Comparative Law. The temporal scope of investment protection treaties [Internet]. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law; 2008. Available from: http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/fy11pdf03/2010286470.html
166.
Schreuer, Christoph, International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. The ICSID Convention: a commentary : a commentary on the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
167.
Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v Spain) (New Application: 1962) (Judgment) [1970] ICJ Rep 4 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/50/5387.pdf
168.
Bayview Irrigation Distict et al v Mexico, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/05/1, Award, 19 June 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0800.pdf
169.
Certain Property (Liechtenstein v Germany) (Preliminary Objections) [2005] ICJ Rep 6 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/123/8234.pdf
170.
Hussein Nuaman Soufraki v UAE, ICSID Case no ARB/02/7, Decision of the ad hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of Mr Soufraki, 5 June 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0800.pdf
171.
Mobile Corporation, Venezuela Holdings, BV et al v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB/07/27, Decision on Jurisdiction, 10 June 2010 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0538.pdf
172.
Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award, 17 March 2006 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf
173.
Tokio Tokelés v Ukraine, ICSID Case no ARB/02/18, Decision on Jurisdiction, 29 April 2004 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0863.pdf
174.
Dissenting Opinion by Chairman Weil [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0864.pdf
175.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph. Chapter 13. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
176.
Paulsson J. Indirect Expropriation: Is the Right to Regulate at Risk? [Internet]. 2005. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/internationalinvestmentagreements/36055332.pdf
177.
Steven R. Ratner. Regulatory Takings in Institutional Context: Beyond the Fear of Fragmented International Law. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 2008;102(3):475–528. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20456640
178.
UNCTAD. 'Expropriation’ in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d7_en.pdf
179.
ADC Affiliate Limited and ADC & ADMC Management Limited v. The Republic of Hungary, ICSID Case no ARB/03/16, Award [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0006.pdf
180.
Burlington Resources Inc. v Ecuador, ICSID Case no ARB/08/5, Decision on Liability, 14 December 2012 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1094_0.pdf
181.
Electrabel SA v Hungary, ICSID Case no ARB/07/19, Decision on Jurisdiction, Applicable Law and Liability, 30 November 2012 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1071clean.pdf
182.
Metalclad Corp. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/97/1, Award, 30 August 2000 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0510.pdf
183.
Methanex Corporation v US, UNCITRAL Case, Final Award, 3 August 2005 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf
184.
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed SA (Spain) v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf
185.
2012 US Model Bilateral Investment Treaty [Internet]. Available from: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf
186.
Christie, G. C. What Constitutes a Taking of Property under International Law. British Year Book of International Law [Internet]. 1962;38. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/byrint38&id=313&collection=journals&index=journals/byrint#313
187.
Rudolf Dolzer. New Foundations of the Law of Expropriation of Alien Property. The American Journal of International Law [Internet]. American Society of International Law; 1981;75(3):553–589. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2200686
188.
Higgins R. The taking of property by the state : recent developments in international law. Recueil des Cours, Collected Courses, Volume 176 (2007) [Internet]. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1982. p. 259–392. Available from: http://www.nijhoffonline.nl/book?id=er176_er176_259-392
189.
Maurice Mendelson. Bail-ins and the International Investment Law of Expropriation: in and beyond Cyprus. Journal of International Banking & Financial Law [Internet]. 2013;28(8). Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T18461728966&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T18461728968&backKey=20_T18461728969&csi=280100&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0
190.
Newcombe A. The Boundaries of Regulatory Expropriation in International Law. ICSID Review. 2005 Mar 1;20(1):1–57.
191.
Paparinskis M. Regulatory Expropriation and Sustainable Developments. Sustainable development in world investment law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International; 2010.
192.
Reinisch A. Expropriation. The Oxford handbook of international investment law [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 407–458. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/42604/chapter/357546997
193.
Reinisch A. 2) Legality of Expropriation. In: Reinisch A, editor. Standards of Investment Protection [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547432.001.0001/acprof-9780199547432
194.
Reisman WM, Sloane RD. Indirect Exproprion and Its Valuation in the Bit Generation. British Yearbook of International Law. 2004 Jan 1;74(1):115–150.
195.
Mavluda Sattorova. Judicial expropriation or denial of justice? A note on Saipem v Bangladesh. International Arbitration Law ReviewCase Comment [Internet]. 2010;13(2):35–41. Available from: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/Document/IEECA537049CB11DFB22484C1B1BFCC5F/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
196.
Bernardus Henricus Funnekotter et al v Zimbabwe, ICSID Case no ARB/05/6, Award, 22 April 2009 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0349.pdf
197.
Deutche Bank AG v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/09/2, Award, 31 October 2012 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1272.pdf
198.
Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award, 17 March 2006 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf
199.
Vanessa Ventures Ltd v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/04/6, Award, 16 January 2013 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1250.pdf
200.
Waste Management v Mexico (II), ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/00/3, Award, 30 April 2004 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0900.pdf
201.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://opil-ouplaw-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/view/10.1093/law/9780199651795.001.0001/law-9780199651795
202.
UNCTAD. ‘Fair and Equitable Treatment’ in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/unctaddiaeia2011d7_en.pdf
203.
Asian Agricultural Products Ltd (AAPL) v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/87/3, Final Award, 27 June 1990 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita1034.pdf
204.
Chevron et al v Ecuador, UNCITRAL, PCA Case no 34877, Partial Award on the Merits, 30 March 2010 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0151.pdf
205.
Deutche Bank AG v Sri Lanka, ICSID Case no ARB/09/2, Award, 31 October 2012 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1272.pdf
206.
Loewen Group et al v US, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/98/3, Award, 26 June 2003 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0470.pdf
207.
Occidental Petroleum Corporation et al v Ecuador, Award, ICSID Case no ARB/06/11, 5 October 2012 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1094.pdf
208.
Saluka Investments BV v Czech Republic, UNCITRAL Case, Partial Award, 17 March 2006 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0740.pdf
209.
Técnicas Medioambientales Tecmed SA (Spain) v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/00/2, Award, 29 May 2003 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0854.pdf
210.
Waste Management v Mexico (II), ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/00/3, Award, 30 April 2004 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0900.pdf
211.
Bjorklund, Andrea K. Reconciling State Sovereignty and Investor Protection in Denial of Justice Claims. Virginia Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2004;45. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vajint45&id=819&collection=journals&index=journals/vajint#819
212.
Diehl A. Part II Chapter 3. The core standard of international investment protection: fair and equitable treatment. Alphen Aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer; 2012.
213.
Paparinskis M. Chapter 8 (on denial of justice) and Chapter 9 (on investment mistreatment under fair and equitable treatment other than denial of justice). The international minimum standard and fair and equitable treatment [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14503354470004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
214.
Paulsson J. Chapters 4-7. Denial of justice in international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
215.
Potesta M. Legitimate Expectations in Investment Treaty Law: Understanding the Roots and the Limits of a Controversial Concept. ICSID Review. 2013 May 1;28(1):88–122.
216.
Schreuer C. Full Protection and Security. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2010 Aug 1;1(2):353–369.
217.
Apotex Inc. v US, UNCITRAL Case, 14 June 2013, Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1550.pdf
218.
Franck Charles Arif v Moldova, ICSID Case no ARB/11/23, Award, 8 April 2013 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1370.pdf
219.
Parkerings-Compagniet AS v. Republic of Lithuania, ICSID Case no ARB/05/8, Award, 11 September 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0619.pdf
220.
Rompetrol Group v Romania, ICSID Case no ARB/06/3, Award, 6 May 2013 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1408.pdf
221.
Vanessa Ventures Ltd v Venezuela, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/04/6, Award, 16 January 2013 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1250.pdf
222.
White Industries Ltd v India, UNCITRAL Case, Final Award, 30 November 2011 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0906.pdf
223.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph. Chapter 14, p. 19-20. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
224.
Paparinskis M. MFN Clauses and International Dispute Settlement: Moving beyond Maffezini and Plama? ICSID Review. 2011 Sep 1;26(2):14–58.
225.
DiMascio, Nicholas. Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin. American Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2008;102. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=48&handle=hein.journals%252Fajil102&collection=journals#56
226.
Sinclair A. The Umbrella Clause Debate. Investment treaty law: current issues, III: Remedies in international investment law, Emerging jurisprudence of international investment law. London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law; 2009.
227.
Corn Products, International, Inc. v Mexico, ICSID Additional Facility Case no ARB(AF)/04/1, Decision on Responsibility, 15 January 2008 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0244.pdf
228.
CMS Gas Transmission Company v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/01/8, Decision of the ad hoc Committee on the Application for Annulment of the Argentine Republic, 25 September 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0187.pdf
229.
Eimilio Augustín Maffezini v Spain, ICSID Case no ARB/97/7, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 25 January 2000 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0479.pdf
230.
Impregilo SpA v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/07/17, Award, Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of Arbitrator Stern, 21 June 2011 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0420.pdf
231.
Methanex Corporation v US, UNCITRAL Case, Final Award, 3 August 2005 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0529.pdf
232.
MTD Equity Sdn Bhd et al v Chile, ICSID Case no ARB/01/7, Decision on Annulment, 21 March 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0546.pdf
233.
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA Case no UN3467, Final Award, 1 July 2004 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf
234.
Plama Consortium Limited v Bulgaria, ICSID Case no ARB/03/24, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf
235.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Philippines (SGS II), ICSID Case no ARB/02/6, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0782.pdf
236.
Bjorklund A. National Treatment. In: Reinisch A, editor. Standards of Investment Protection [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199547432.001.0001/acprof-9780199547432
237.
Douglas Z. 1) The MFN Clause in Investment Arbitration: Treaty Interpretation Off the Rails. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2011 Feb 1;2(1):97–113.
238.
Douglas, Zachary. 2) Chapter 9. The international law of investment claims [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14508605270004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
239.
Gallus N. An Umbrella just for Two? BIT Obligations Observance Clauses and the Parties to a Contract. Arbitration International [Internet]. 24(1):157–170. Available from: http://www.kluwerarbitration.com/document.aspx?id=ipn28355
240.
Schill SW. Allocating Adjudicatory Authority: Most-Favoured-Nation Clauses as a Basis of Jurisdiction--A Reply to Zachary Douglas. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2011 Aug 1;2(2):353–371.
241.
UNCTAD, ‘Most-Favoured-Nation Treatment’ in UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II [Internet]. Available from: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20101_en.pdf
242.
Orrego Vicuna F. Reports of [Maffezini’s] demise have been greatly exaggerated. Journal of International Dispute Settlement. 2012 Jul 1;3(2):299–327.
243.
BIVAC v Paraguay, ICSID Case no ARB/07/9, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 29 May 2009 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0103.pdf
244.
Further Decision on Objections to Jurisdiction, 9 October 2012 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1109.pdf
245.
Hochtief AG v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/07/31, Decision on Jurisdiction, 24 October 2011 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0405.pdf
246.
ICS Inspection and Control Services Limited (UK) v Argentina, UNCITRAL, PCA Case no 2010-9, Award on Jurisdiction, 10 February 2012 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0416.pdf
247.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Pakistan (SGS I), ICSID Case no ARB/01/13, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 6 August 2003 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0779.pdf
248.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Paraguay (SGS III), ICSID Case no ARB/01/13, Decision on Jurisdiction, 12 February 2010 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1526.pdf
249.
and Award, 10 February 2012 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/italaw1525.pdf
250.
SGS Société Générale de Surveillance SA v Philippines (SGS II), ICSID Case no ARB/02/6, Decision of the Tribunal on Objections to Jurisdiction, 29 January 2004, Declaration of Arbirator Crivellaro [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0783.pdf
251.
Dolzer, Rudolf, Schreuer, Christoph. Chapter 16. Principles of international investment law [Internet]. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14740378850004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
252.
Douglas, Zachary. Chapter 13. The international law of investment claims [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=14508605270004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760&VE=true
253.
Kurtz J. ADJUDGING THE EXCEPTIONAL AT INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW: SECURITY, PUBLIC ORDER AND FINANCIAL CRISIS. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2010 Apr;59(02):325–371.
254.
Paparinskis M. Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures. British Yearbook of International Law. 2009 Jan 1;79(1):264–352.
255.
BG Group Plc v Argentina, UNCITRAL, Final Award, 24 December 2007 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0081.pdf
256.
Burlington Resources Inc. v Ecuador, ICSID Case no ARB/08/5, Decision on Jurisdiction, 2 June 2010 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0106.pdf
257.
Continental Casualty Company v Argentina, ICSID Case no ARB/03/9, Award, 5 September 2008 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0228.pdf
258.
Pac Rim Cayman LLC v El Salvador, ICSID Case no ARB/09/12, Decision on the Respondent’s Jurisdictional Objections, 1 June 2012 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0935.pdf
259.
Plama Consortium Limited v Bulgaria, ICSID Case no ARB/03/24, Decision on Jurisdiction, 8 February 2005 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0669.pdf
260.
1991 US-Argentina BIT [Internet]. Available from: http://unctad.org/sections/dite/iia/docs/bits/argentina_us.pdf
261.
2004 Canada Model Bilateral Investment Treaty [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/documents/Canadian2004-FIPA-model-en.pdf
262.
2012 US Model Bilateral Investment Treaty [Internet]. Available from: http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/188371.pdf
263.
Alvarez J, Khamsi K. The Argentine Crisis and Foreign Investors: A Glimpse into the Heart of the Investment Regime. Yearbook on international investment law & policy [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.vcc.columbia.edu/pubs/documents/Alvarez-final_000.pdf
264.
Binder C. Changed Circumstances in Investment Law: Interfaces between the Law of Treaties and the Law of State Responsibility with a Special Focus on the Argentine Crisis. International investment law for the 21st century essays in honour of Christoph Schreuer [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: https://ucl.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=alma9930966404504761&context=L&vid=44UCL_INST:UCL_VU2&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Local%20Search%20Engine&isFrbr=true&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,International%20investment%20law%20for%20the%2021st%20century:%20essays%20in%20honour%20of%20Christoph%20Schreuer&sortby=date_d&facet=frbrgroupid,include,9011823993333656972&offset=0
265.
Paparinskis M. Investment Treaty Arbitration and the (New) Law of State Responsibility. European Journal of International Law. 2013 May 1;24(2):617–647.
266.
Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company v Meico, ICSID Case no ARB(AF)/02/1, Decision on Preliminary Question, 17 July 2003 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0330_0.pdf
267.
Occidental Exploration and Production Company v Ecuador, LCIA Case no UN3467, Final Award, 1 July 2004 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0571.pdf
268.
Yukos Universal Limited (Isle of Man) v Russia, PCA Case no AA 227, Interim Award on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 30 November 2009 [Internet]. Available from: http://italaw.com/sites/default/files/case-documents/ita0910.pdf
