Bibliography for PUBL0032: International Law and Human Rights : Dr Nathan Derejko

[1]
Abella v. Argentina, Case 11.137, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Report No. 55/97: 1997. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cases/1997/argentina55-97a.html.

[2]
Abresch, W. A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights in Chechnya. European Journal of International Law. 16, 4, 741–767. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi139.

[3]
Addis, Adeno Individualism, Communitarianism, And The Rights Of Ethnic Minorities. The Notre Dame Law Review. 67, 3, 615–676.

[4]
Advisory Opinion on Reservations to the Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide: 28AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&k=90&case=12&code=ppcg&p3=4.

[5]
Akehurst, M. 1975. The Hierarchy of the Sources of International Law. The British year book of international law. 47, 273 (1975), 281–285.

[6]
Alan Boyle,Christine Chinkin, The Making of International Law.

[7]
Alan E. Boyle and C.M. Chinkin 2007. The making of international law. Oxford University Press.

[8]
de Albuquerque, C. Chronicle of an Announced Birth: The Coming into Life of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights—The Missing Piece of the International Bill of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 32, 1, 144–178. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.0.0137.

[9]
Alston, P. A Human Rights Perspective on the Millennium Development Goals.

[10]
Alston, P. et al. 2008. Human rights, intervention, and the use of force. Oxford University Press.

[11]
Alston, P. et al. 2012. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.

[12]
Alston, P. Study on Targeted Killings – Addendum to the Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.

[13]
Alston, P. and Goodman, R. 2012. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.

[14]
Alston, P. and Goodman, R. 2012. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.

[15]
Alston, P. and Goodman, R. 2012. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.

[16]
Alston, P. and Goodman, R. 2012. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.

[17]
Alston, P. and Goodman, R. 2012. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.

[18]
Alston, P. and Goodman, R. 2012. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.

[19]
Alston, P. and Goodman, R. 2012. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.

[20]
Alston, P. and Goodman, R. 2012. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.

[21]
Alston, P. and Goodman, R. 2012. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.

[22]
Alston, P. and Goodman, R. 2012. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.

[23]
Alston, P. and Goodman, R. 2012. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.

[24]
Alston, P. and Goodman, R. 2012. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.

[25]
Alston, P. and Goodman, R. 2012. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.

[26]
Alston, P. and Goodman, R. 2012. McCann and others v.United Kingdom: European Court of Human Rights, Application No.18984/91 (Grand Chamber), 27 Sept.1995. Oxford University Press.

[27]
American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man: 1948. http://www.hrcr.org/docs/OAS_Declaration/oasrights.html.

[28]
Andrew Clapham, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors.

[29]
Antonio Cassese 2005. International law. Oxford University Press.

[30]
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (DRC v. Uganda), ICJ Rep. 168: 2005. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&code=co&case=116&k=51/.

[31]
Armstrong, J.D. et al. 2012. International law and international relations. Cambridge University Press.

[32]
Armstrong, J.D. et al. 2007. International law and international relations. Cambridge University Press.

[33]
Arnold, R. and Quénivet, N.N.R. 2008. International humanitarian law and human rights law: towards a new merger in international law. Martinus Nijhoff.

[34]
Arosemena, G. Conflicts of rights in international human rights: A meta-rule analysis. Global Constitutionalism. 2, 1, 6–36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381712000214.

[35]
Askin, K.D. and Koenig, D.M. 1999. Women and international human rights law. Transnational.

[36]
d’Aspremont, J. and Dopagne, F. 2008. Kadi: The ECJ’s Reminder of the Elementary Divide between Legal Orders. International Organizations Law Review. 5, 2 (2008), 371–379. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1163/157237408X412970.

[37]
Aurel Sari 2013. The Relationship Between Community Law and International Law after Kadi. International law in a multipolar world. Routledge.

[38]
Aust, A. 2013. Modern treaty law and practice. Cambridge University Press.

[39]
Aust, H.P. 2011. Complicity and the law of state responsibility. Cambridge University Press.

[40]
Avbelj, M. et al. eds. 2014. Kadi on trial: a multifaceted analysis of the Kadi trial. Routledge.

[41]
Bámaca Velásquez v. Guatemala, Case No. 11/129 (Merits), Inter-Am. Ct. H.R., (Ser. C) No. 70: 2000. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/iachr/C/70-ing.html.

[42]
Başak Cali Balancing Human Rights? Methodological Problems with Weights, Scales and Proportions. Human Rights Quarterly. 29, 1, 251–270.

[43]
Başak Cali 2010. International law for international relations. Oxford University Press.

[44]
Bassiouni, M.C. and Schabas, W. eds. 2011. New challenges for the UN human rights machinery: what future for the UN treaty body system and the Human Rights Council procedures?. Intersentia.

[45]
Belilos v. Switzerland, ECtHR App. No 10328/83 (1988): http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"appno":["10328/83"],"itemid":["001-57434"]}.

[46]
Benvenisti, E. Margin of Appreciation, Consensus and Universal Standards. New York University journal of international law & politics. 31, 4, 843–854.

[47]
Besson, S. 2010. Theorizing the Sources of International Law. The philosophy of international law. Oxford University Press.

[48]
Beth A. Simmons and Richard H. Steinberg 2006. International law and international relations. Cambridge University Press.

[49]
Bianchi, A. 2008. Human Rights and the Magic of Jus Cogens. European Journal of International Law. 19, 3 (2008), 491–508. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn026.

[50]
Bird, A. 2010. Third State Responsibility for Human Rights Violations. European Journal of International Law. 21, 4 (2010), 883–900. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chq066.

[51]
Bothe, M. 2001. The Protection of the Civilian Population and NATO Bombing on Yugoslavia: Comments on a Report to the Prosecutor of the ICTY. European Journal of International Law. 12, 3 (2001), 531–536. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/12.3.531.

[52]
Brady, A.D.P. 2012. Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge University Press.

[53]
Brady, A.D.P. 2012. Proportionality and deference under the UK Human Rights Act: an institutionally sensitive approach. Cambridge University Press.

[54]
Brems, E. and International Conference on Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights 2008. Conflicts between fundamental rights. Intersentia.

[55]
Bullard, A. 2008. Human rights in crisis. Ashgate.

[56]
de Burca, G. The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi. Harvard International Law Journal. 51, 1–49.

[57]
Burns, W.C.G. and Osofsky, H.M. 2009. Adjudicating climate change: state, national, and international approaches. Cambridge University Press.

[58]
Cannizzaro, E. and Arsanjani, M.H. 2011. The law of treaties beyond the Vienna Convention. Oxford University Press.

[59]
Carozza, P.G. 2008. Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights: A Reply. European Journal of International Law. 19, 5 (2008), 931–944. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn059.

[60]
Carozza, P.G. ‘My Friend Is a Stranger’: The Death Penalty and the Global Ius Commune of Human Rights. Texas Law Review. 81, 4, 1031–1089.

[61]
Cass R. Sunstein 1995. Rights and Their Critics. Notre Dame Law Review. 70, 4 (1995), 727–768.

[62]
Charlesworth, H. et al. Feminist Approaches to International Law. The American Journal of International Law. 85, 4, 613–645.

[63]
Charlesworth, H. and Chinkin, C.M. 2000. The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis. Manchester University Press.

[64]
Chinkin, C. 1999. A critique of the public/private dimension. European Journal of International Law. 10, 2 (1999), 387–395. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/10.2.387.

[65]
Clapham, A. and Academy of European Law 2006. Human rights obligations of non-state actors. Oxford University Press.

[66]
Coard v. the United States of America, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Case 10.951: 1999. https://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/99eng/Merits/UnitedStates10.951.htm.

[67]
Committee Against Torture, General Comment No. 2, Implementation of article 2 by States Parties: 2007. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cat/general_comments/cat-gencom2.html.

[68]
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment: 1984. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CAT.aspx.

[69]
Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW): 1979. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/.

[70]
Cordula Droege The Interplay between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Armed Conflict. Israel Law Review. 40, 2, 310–355. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700013376.

[71]
Corten, O. and Klein, P. 2011. The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: a commentary. Oxford University Press.

[72]
• Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly, Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights 3AD. The Future of the European Court of Human Rights and the Brighton Declaration, AS/Jur.

[73]
Craven, M.C.R. 2002. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: a perspective on its development. Clarendon Press.

[74]
Crawford, J.R. 23AD. The Identification of Customary International Law. Spring Conference of the ILA British Branch.

[75]
CRC Concluding Observations on the Holy See: 5AD. http://www.ejiltalk.org/crc-concluding-observations-on-the-holy-see/.

[76]
de Burca, G The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order After Kadi. Harvard International Law Journal. 51, 1, 1–49.

[77]
De Schutter, O. and et al Commentary to the Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. 34, 4, 1084–1169. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2012.0063.

[78]
DE WET, E. and VIDMAR, J. 2013. Conflicts between international paradigms: Hierarchy versus systemic integration. Global Constitutionalism. 2, 02 (Jul. 2013), 196–217. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381713000129.

[79]
Dinah Shelton, The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law 2013: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do;jsessionid=BBDE8C447BB987EEC948830E0037FE55?cs=frb&ct=frb&frbg=707356124&fctN=facet_frbrgroupid&fctV=707356124&doc=UCL_LMS_DS002234891&lastPag=&lastPagIndx=1&rfnGrp=frbr&frbrSrt=rank&frbrRecordsSource=Primo+Local&frbrJtitleDisplay=&frbrIssnDisplay=&frbrEissnDisplay=&frbrSourceidDisplay=UCL_LMS_DS&query=any%2Ccontains%2CDinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&indx=1&fn=search&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A(UCL)%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=false&ct=search&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=Dinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&dstmp=1508443362273&fromDL.

[80]
Dinah Shelton, The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law 2013: http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do;jsessionid=BBDE8C447BB987EEC948830E0037FE55?cs=frb&ct=frb&frbg=707356124&fctN=facet_frbrgroupid&fctV=707356124&doc=UCL_LMS_DS002234891&lastPag=&lastPagIndx=1&rfnGrp=frbr&frbrSrt=rank&frbrRecordsSource=Primo+Local&frbrJtitleDisplay=&frbrIssnDisplay=&frbrEissnDisplay=&frbrSourceidDisplay=UCL_LMS_DS&query=any%2Ccontains%2CDinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&indx=1&fn=search&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A(UCL)%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=false&ct=search&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=Dinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&dstmp=1508443362273&fromDL.

[81]
Dinstein, Y. 2016. Lawful targets of attack. The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict. Cambridge University Press. 102–138.

[82]
Dinstein, Y. 2016. Prohibited weapons. The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict. Cambridge University Press. 72–101.

[83]
Doswald-Beck, L. and Vité, S. International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law. International Review of the Red Cross. 33, 293, 94–119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020860400071539.

[84]
Duffy, A. 2008. Expulsion to Face Torture? Non-refoulement in International Law. International Journal of Refugee Law. 20, 3 (2008), 373–390. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/een022.

[85]
Easterly, W. How the Millennium Development Goals are Unfair to Africa. World Development. 37, 1, 26–35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.02.009.

[86]
Ed Bates Avoiding Legal Obligations Created by Human Rights Treaties. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 57, 4, 751–788.

[87]
Egan, S. 2011. The United Nations human rights treaty system: law and procedure. Bloomsbury Professional.

[88]
van Elsuwege, P. 2012. New challenges for pluralist adjudication after Lisbon: the protection of fundamental rights in a Ius commune Europaeum. Netherlands quarterly of human rights. 30, 2 (2012), 195–217.

[89]
European Convention on Human Rights & Fundamental Freedoms: 1950. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/005.htm.

[90]
European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: 1950. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer.

[91]
European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: 1950. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer.

[92]
European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: 1950. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer.

[93]
European Court of Human Rights 2AD. Al-Saadoon & Mufdhi v UK, ECtHR (61498/08).

[94]
European Court of Human Rights 14AD. Hussein v. Albania & Others, ECtHR, Admissibility Decision, App no. 23276/04.

[95]
European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber) 7AD. Al-Jedda v. UK, ECtHR, App. no. 27021/08.

[96]
European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber) 13AD. El Masri v. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, ECtHR, App No. 39630/09.

[97]
European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber) 8AD. Ilaşcu v. Moldova and Russia, ECtHR, App no. 48787/99.

[98]
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 18AD. European Commission v. Kadi, ECJ C-584/10 P & C-595/10 P.

[99]
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber) 3AD. Kadi & Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council of the EU & Commission of the EU, ECJ C-402/05 P & C-415/05 P.

[100]
Evans, M.D. ed. 2018. International law. Oxford University Press.

[101]
Extraterritorial jurisdiction: http://business-humanrights.org/en/special-representative/un-secretary-generals-special-representative-on-business-human-rights/materials-by-topic/extraterritorial-jurisdiction.

[102]
Fassbender, B. et al. 2012. The Oxford handbook of the history of international law. Oxford University Press.

[103]
Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia: 2000. http://www.icty.org/sid/10052.

[104]
Foreign Surveillance and Human Rights: Introduction: 25AD. http://www.ejiltalk.org/foreign-surveillance-and-human-rights-introduction/.

[105]
Forsythe, D.P. 2012. Human rights in international relations. Cambridge University Press.

[106]
Foster, L. et al. 2012. Balancing competing human rights claims in a diverse society: institutions, policy, principles. Irwin Law.

[107]
Fourth Periodic Report of the United States of America to the United Nations Committee on Human Rights Concerning the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/179781.htm.

[108]
Gauri, V. and Brinks, D.M. 2008. Courting social justice: judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world. Cambridge University Press.

[109]
General Comment 34, U.N. Doc CCPR/C/GC/34: 2011. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4ed34b562.html.

[110]
General Comment No. 24: Issues relating to reservations made upon ratification or accession to the Covenant or the Optional Protocols thereto, or in relation to declarations under article 41 of the Covenant, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.6: 1994. https://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/hrcom24.htm.

[111]
Geneva Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War: 1949. http://www.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/375?OpenDocument.

[112]
Geneva Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War: 1949. http://www.icrc.org/ihl/385ec082b509e76c41256739003e636d/6756482d86146898c125641e004aa3c5.

[113]
Ghandhi, P.R. 2010. Blackstone’s international human rights documents. Oxford University Press.

[114]
Goldsmith, J.L. 2012. Power and constraint: the accountable presidency after 9/11. W. W. Norton & Co.

[115]
Greenberg, K.J. 2009. The least worst place: Guantanamo’s first 100 days. Oxford University Press.

[116]
Guzman, A.T. and Meyer, T.L. International Common Law: The Soft law of International Tribunals. Chicago journal of international law. 9, 2, 515–536.

[117]
Harris, D.J. and Sivakumaran, S. 2015. Cases and materials on international law. Sweet & Maxwell.

[118]
Heintze, H.-J. On the relationship between human rights law protection and international humanitarian law. Revue Internationale de la Croix-Rouge/International Review of the Red Cross. 86, 856, 789–814. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1560775500180460.

[119]
Higgins, R. 2000. Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Clarendon.

[120]
Hilary Charlesworth and C.M. Chinkin 2000. The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis. Manchester University Press, Juris.

[121]
HRC, General Comment No. 31: Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: 2004. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/hrcom31.html.

[122]
Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 31, Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13: 2004. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/hrcom31.html.

[123]
Humphreys, S. 2010. Human rights and climate change. Cambridge Unviersity Press.

[124]
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty The Responsibility to Protect.

[125]
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination: 1965. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CERD.aspx.

[126]
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination: 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CERD.aspx.

[127]
International Council on Human Rights Policy 2011. Beyond Technology Transfer: Protecting Human Rights in a Climate-Constrained World.

[128]
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx.

[129]
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx.

[130]
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx.

[131]
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx.

[132]
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx.

[133]
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx.

[134]
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx.

[135]
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx.

[136]
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Appeal Judgement, Case No. IT-95-14-A.

[137]
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia 2003. Prosecutor v. Galić, Trial Judgment, Case No. IT-98-29-T.

[138]
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia Prosecutor v. Gotovina, Appeals Judgment, Case No. IT-06-90-A.

[139]
Interpretive guidance on the notion of direct participation in hostilities under international humanitarian law: 2009. http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/publication/p0990.htm.

[140]
Isiksel, N.T. Fundamental rights in the EU after Kadi and Al Barakaat. European Law Journal. 16, 5, 551–577. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00522.x.

[141]
Isiksel, T. Global legal pluralism as fact and norm. Global Constitutionalism. 2, 2, 160–195. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381713000130.

[142]
Isiksel, T. and Thies, A. Changing subjects: Rights, remedies and responsibilities of individuals under global legal pluralism. Global Constitutionalism. 2, 2, 151–159. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381713000117.

[143]
Johan Steyn Guantanamo Bay: The Legal Black Hole. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 53, 1, 1–15.

[144]
Kennedy, D. 1997. A critique of adjudication: fin de siècle. Harvard University Press.

[145]
Kennedy, D. 2004. The dark sides of virtue: reassessing international humanitarianism. Princeton University Press.

[146]
Kingsbury, B. 2002. Legal Positivism as Normative Politics: International Society, Balance of Power and Lassa Oppenheim’s Positive International Law. European Journal of International Law. 13, 2 (2002), 401–437. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/13.2.401.

[147]
Klare, K. 1991. Legal Theory and Democratic Reconstruction. University of British Columbia law review. 25, 1 (1991), 69–103.

[148]
Klatt, M. and Meister, M. 2012. Proportionality--a benefit to human rights? Remarks on the I.CON controversy. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 10, 3 (2012), 687–708. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos019.

[149]
Klatt, M. and Meister, M. 2012. The constitutional structure of proportionality. Oxford University Press.

[150]
Kokott, J. and Sobotta, C. 2012. The Kadi Case - Constitutional Core Values and International Law - Finding the Balance? European Journal of International Law. 23, 4 (2012), 1015–1024. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chs063.

[151]
Kolb, R. Selected Problems in the Theory of Customary International Law. Netherlands International Law Review. 50, 2, 119–150. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X03001190.

[152]
Kolb, R. The relationship between international humanitarian law and human rights law: A brief history of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the 1949 Geneva Conventions. International Review of the Red Cross. 38, 324, 409–419. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S002086040009121X.

[153]
Koskenniemi, M. 1997. Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch. European Journal of International Law. 8, 4 (1997), 566–582.

[154]
Koskenniemi, M. Human Rights Mainstreaming as a Strategy for Institutional Power. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development. 1, 1, 47–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/hum.2010.0003.

[155]
Kretzmer, D. Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defence? European Journal of International Law. 16, 2, 171–212. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi114.

[156]
Krook, M.L. 2009. Quotas for women in politics: gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. Oxford University Press.

[157]
Langford, M. 2008. Social rights jurisprudence: emerging trends in international and comparative law. Cambridge University Press.

[158]
Las Palmeras v. Colombia (Preliminary Objections, February 4, 2000), Inter-Am. Ct. H.R., (Ser. C) No. 67: 2000. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/iachr/C/67-ing.html.

[159]
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep. 136: 2004. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&case=131&p3=4.

[160]
Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep. 136: 2004. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&case=131&p3=4.

[161]
Levinson, S. 2004. Torture: a collection. Oxford University Press.

[162]
Madhav Khosla 2010. Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights: A Reply. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 8, 2 (2010), 293–306.

[163]
Manjoo, R. 2011. Violence Against Women in the United States and the State’s Obligation to Protect. University of Virginia School of Law.

[164]
Marco Roscini Targeting and Contemporary Aerial Bombardment. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 54, 2, 411–443.

[165]
McCorquodale, R. and Simons, P. Responsibility beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law. The Modern Law Review. 70, 4, 598–625.

[166]
McCrudden, C. 2008. Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law. 19, 4 (2008), 655–724. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn043.

[167]
Meron, T. 1997. Convergence of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law. Human rights and humanitarian law: the quest for universality. M. Nijhoff.

[168]
Meron, T. 1989. Human rights and humanitarian norms as customary law. Clarendon.

[169]
Meyersfeld, B. 2010. Domestic violence and international law. Hart.

[170]
Moeckli, D. et al. 2014. International human rights law. Oxford University Press.

[171]
Moeckli, D. et al. 2014. International human rights law. Oxford University Press.

[172]
Moeckli, D. et al. 2014. International human rights law. Oxford University Press.

[173]
Moeckli, D. et al. 2014. International human rights law. Oxford University Press.

[174]
Moeckli, D. et al. 2014. International human rights law. Oxford University Press.

[175]
Moeckli, D. et al. 2014. International human rights law. Oxford University Press.

[176]
Mullally, S. Domestic Violence Asylum Claims and Recent Developments in International Human Rights Law: A Progress Narrative? International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 60, 2, 459–484. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589311000042.

[177]
Nelson, P.J. Human Rights, the Millennium Development Goals, and the Future of Development Cooperation. World Development. 35, 12, 2041–2055. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.006.

[178]
Nollkaemper, A. and Jacobs, D. Shared Responsibility in International Law. Michigan journal of international law. 34, 2, 359–438.

[179]
Noyes, J.E. and Smith, B.D. State Responsibility and the Principle of Joint and Several Liability. The Yale journal of international law. 13, 2, 225–267.

[180]
O’Connell, M.E. and Cogens, J. 2012. International Law’s Higher Ethical Norms. The role of ethics in international law. Cambridge University Press.

[181]
Office of the Assistant Attorney General, Memorandum for the Attorney General, July 16, 2010: http://www.washingtonpost.com/r/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2014/06/23/National- Security/Graphics/memodrones.pdf.

[182]
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights 15AD. Report of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Relationship Between Climate Change and Human Rights, UN Doc. A/HRC/10/61.

[183]
Olivier Corten,Pierre Klein, The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary.

[184]
Onora O’Neill The Dark Side of Human Rights. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). 81, 2, 427–439.

[185]
Orakhelashvili, A. 2008. The Interaction between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Fragmentation, Conflict, Parallelism, or Convergence? European Journal of International Law. 19, 1 (2008), 161–182. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chm055.

[186]
Örücü, E. and United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law 2003. Judicial comparativism in human rights cases. United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law.

[187]
Perreau-Saussine, A. and Murphy, J.B. 2007. The nature of customary law. Cambridge University Press.

[188]
Perreau-Saussine, A. and Murphy, J.B. eds. 2007. The Nature of Customary Law. Cambridge University Press.

[189]
Philip Alston Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate Seen through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals. Human Rights Quarterly. 27, 3, 755–829.

[190]
Pogge, T.W.M. 2008. World poverty and human rights: cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms. Polity.

[191]
Protocol (I) Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts: 1977. http://www.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/470.

[192]
Protocol No. 13 to European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: 2002. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=187&CL=ENG.

[193]
Rainey, B. et al. 2017. Jacobs, White & Ovey: the European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford University Press.

[194]
Report of UN Special Rapporteurs on Mission To Lebanon And Israel, UN Doc A/HRC/2/7: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G06/141/95/PDF/G0614195.pdf?OpenElement.

[195]
Responding to Hizbullah attacks from Lebanon: Issues of proportionality: 25AD. http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/aboutisrael/state/law/pages/responding%20to%20hizbullah%20attacks%20from%20lebanon-%20issues%20of%20proportionality%20july%202006.aspx.

[196]
R.H. Helmholz Natural Human Rights: The Perspective of the IUS Commune. Catholic University Law Review. 52, 2.

[197]
R.J. Vincent 1986. Human rights and international relations. Published in association with the Royal Institute of International Affairs by Cambridge University Press.

[198]
Rosalyn Higgins 1994. Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Clarendon Press.

[199]
Rosenberg, G.N. 2008. The hollow hope: can courts bring about social change?. University of Chicago.

[200]
Roth, K. Defending Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Practical Issues Faced by an International Human Rights Organization. 26, 1.

[201]
Roth, K. 2004. Response to Leonard S. Rubenstein. Human Rights Quarterly. 26, 4 (2004), 873–878. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2004.0055.

[202]
Roth, K. et al. 2005. Torture: does it make us safer? Is it ever OK? : a human rights perspective. New Press in conjunction with Human Rights Watch.

[203]
Rubenstein, L.S. 2004. How International Human Rights Organizations Can Advance Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Response to Kenneth Roth. Human Rights Quarterly. 26, 4 (2004), 845–865. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2004.0056.

[204]
Ruggie, J.G. Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda. The American Journal of International Law. 101, 4, 819–840.

[205]
Ryngaert, C. The European Court of Human Rights’ approach to the responsibility of member states in connection with acts of international organizations. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 60, 04, 997–1016. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589311000467.

[206]
Sachs, J.D. and McArthur, J.W. 22AD. The Millennium Project: a plan for meeting the Millennium Development Goals. Lancet. 365, 9456 (22AD), 347–353.

[207]
Saith, A. From Universal Values to Millennium Development Goals: Lost in Translation. Development and Change. 37, 6, 1167–1199. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00518.x.

[208]
Samuels, H. Feminizing Human Rights Adjudication: Feminist Method and the Proportionality Principle. Feminist Legal Studies. 21, 1, 39–60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9225-6.

[209]
Sands, P. 2008. Torture team: Rumsfeld’s memo and the betrayal of American values. Palgrave Macmillan.

[210]
Sands, P.P. et al. Legal Opinion: The Lawfulness of the Authorisation by the United Kingdom of Weapons and Related Items for Export to Saudi Arabia in the Context of Saudi Arabia’s Military Intervention in Yemen (11 December, 2015).

[211]
Saul, B. et al. 2014. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: commentary, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.

[212]
Schutter, O. de 2014. International human rights law: cases, materials, commentary. Cambridge University Press.

[213]
Sepúlveda, M.M. 2003. The nature of the obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Intersentia.

[214]
Shaw, M.N. 2017. International law. Cambridge University Press.

[215]
Shaw, M.N. 2003. International Law. Cambridge University Press.

[216]
Shelton, D. 2008. Regional protection of human rights. Oxford University Press.

[217]
Shelton, D. ed. 2013. The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. Oxford University Press.

[218]
Shue, H. 1996. Basic rights: subsistence, affluence, and U.S. foreign policy. Princeton University Press.

[219]
Smith, R.K.M. 2013. Texts and materials on international human rights. Routledge.

[220]
Stavros Tsakyrakis 2009. Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights? International Journal of Constitutional Law. 7, 3 (2009), 468–493.

[221]
Stavros Tsakyrakis 2010. Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights: A Rejoinder to Madhav Khosla. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 8, 2 (2010), 307–310.

[222]
Stone Sweet, A. A cosmopolitan legal order: Constitutional pluralism and rights adjudication in Europe. Global Constitutionalism. 1, 1, 53–90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381711000062.

[223]
Supreme Court 19AD. Smith (No. 2) v. Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41.

[224]
Supreme Court of Israel 2006. Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. Israel, Supreme Court of Israel, HCJ 769/02. Hague Justice Portal.

[225]
Sweet, A.S. and Matthews, J. 2008. Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 47, (2008).

[226]
Tara Melish 2002. Protecting economic, social and cultural rights in the Inter-American human rights system. Centro de Derechos EconoÃÂmicos y Sociales.

[227]
The EU’s Dirty Hands: http://www.hrw.org/reports/2011/09/21/eu-s-dirty-hands-0.

[228]
The Relationship between International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2005/14: 2005. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/subcom/57/aevdoc.htm.

[229]
Theodor Meron The Humanization of Humanitarian Law. The American Journal of International Law. 94, 2, 239–278.

[230]
Thomas Nagel The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 33, 2, 113–147.

[231]
Travis, P. and et al Overcoming health-systems constraints to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. The Lancet. 364, 9437, 900–906. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16987-0.

[232]
Tushnet, M.V. 2008. Weak courts, strong rights: judicial review and social welfare rights in comparative constitutional law. Princeton University Press.

[233]
U.N. General Assembly 20AD. General Assembly Third Committee, The Right to Privacy in a Digital Age, UN Doc. A/C.3/68/L.45. United Nations.

[234]
UN surveillance resolution goes ahead despite attempts to dilute language: 21AD. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/21/un-surveillance-resolution-us-uk-dilute-language.

[235]
United Nations 2009. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 20, Non-Discrimination in Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (art. 2, para. 2) U.N. Doc. E/C.12/GC/20. University of Minnesota Human Rights Library.

[236]
United Nations 2001. Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. International Law Commission.

[237]
United Nations 2011. International legal protection of human rights in armed conflict. United Nations.

[238]
United Nations 1945. UN Charter. United Nations.

[239]
Universal Declaration of Human Rights: 1948. http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/.

[240]
Universal Declaration of Human Rights: 1948. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.

[241]
U.S. Policy Standards and Procedures for the Use of Force in Counterterrorism Operations Outside the United States and Areas of Active Hostilities: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/fact-sheet-us-policy-standards-and-procedures-use-force-counterterrorism.

[242]
Uvin, P. 2004. Human rights and development. Kumarian Press.

[243]
Venice Commission 17AD. Opinion on the International Legal Obligations of Council of Europe member states in respect of secret detention facilities and inter-state transport of prisoners, Opinion No. 363/2005, Doc. CDL-AD(2006)009.

[244]
Vincent, R.J. 1987. Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge University Press.

[245]
Virgílio Afonso da Silva Comparing the Incommensurable: Constitutional Principles, Balancing and Rational Decision. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 31, 2, 273–301.

[246]
Vizard, P. 2006. Poverty and human rights: Sen’s ‘capability perspective’ explored. Oxford University Press.

[247]
Watkin, K. Controlling the Use of Force: A Role for Human Rights Norms in Contemporary Armed Conflict. The American Journal of International Law. 98, 1, 1–34.

[248]
de Wet, E. and Vidmar, J. Conflicts between international paradigms: Hierarchy versus systemic integration. Global Constitutionalism. 2, 2, 196–217. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381713000129.

[249]
White, L. and Perelman, J. 2011. Stones of hope: how African activists reclaim human rights to challenge global poverty. Stanford University Press.

[250]
White, R.C.A. et al. 2010. The European Convention on Human Rights. Oxford University Press.

[251]
Yamin, A.E. and Gloppen, S. 2011. Litigating health rights: can courts bring more justice to health?. Harvard University Press.

[252]
Yamin, A.E. and Parra-Vera, O. Judicial protection of the right to health in Colombia: From social demands to individual claims to public debates. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review. 33, 2, 431–459.

[253]
Young, K.G. 2012. Constituting economic and social rights. Oxford University Press.

[254]
Young, K.G. and Lemaitre, J. 2013. The Comparative Fortunes of the Right to Health: Two Tales of Justiciability in Colombia and South Africa. Harvard Human Rights Journal. 26, 1 (2013), 179–216.

[255]
Ziegler, K.S. 2009. Strengthening the Rule of Law, but Fragmenting International Law: The Kadi Decision of the ECJ from the Perspective of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 9, 2 (2009), 288–305. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngp010.

[256]
Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo (Request for Advisory Opinion), 2010 ICJ Rep 403 (22 July).

[257]
Acevedo Buendía v. Perú, IACtHR (1 July, 2009).

[258]
ACHPR.

[259]
Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (Protocol of San Salvador) (1988).

[260]
Advisory Opinion of the African Commission on Human and Peoples ’ Rights on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007).

[261]
African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Banjul Charter / ACHPR) (1981).

[262]
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Principles and Guidelines on the Implementation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (November 2010).

[263]
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Principles and Guidelines on the Implementation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (November 2010).

[264]
Al-Jedda v. UK, ECtHR, [GC] App. no. 27021/08 (2011).

[265]
Al-Nashiri v. Poland, ECtHR, App no. 28761/11 (24 July, 2014).

[266]
American Convention on Human Rights (Pact of San Jose / ACHR) (1969).

[267]
Apirana Mahuika v. New Zealand, Human Rights Committee, Comm. No. 547/1993, UN Doc. CCPR/C/70/D/547/1993 (2000).

[268]
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, 2007 ICJ Rep 43 (2007).

[269]
2005. Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v Ireland (Application 45036/98) 42 EHRR 1, 19 BHRC 299. European Court of Human Rights.

[270]
Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th ed., 2012), James Crawford.

[271]
Centre for Minority Rights Development (Kenya) and Minority Rights Group International on behalf of Endorois Welfare Council v. Kenya, Afr Comm’n HPR Case 276/03 (2010).

[272]
CIA Office of General Counsel, Draft: Legal Appendix: Paragraph 5-Hostile Interrogations: Legal Considerations for CIA Officers, November 26, 2002.

[273]
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 15 (2002).

[274]
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948).

[275]
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948).

[276]
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, GA Res 61/295 (2007.

[277]
2013. Eweida & others v. UK, ECtHR, App. Nos. 48420/10, 59842/10, 51671/10 and 36516/10. European Court of Human Rights.

[278]
6AD. Goekce v. Austria, Annex, U.N. Doc. CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005. CEDAW.

[279]
1976. Handyside v. UK, ECtHR, App. No. 5493/72. European Court of Human Rights.

[280]
2014. Hassan v. UK, ECtHR [GC], no. 29750/09 (2014).

[281]
House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights, The Government’s policy on the use of drones for targeted killing, Second Report of Session 2015–16, HL Paper 141 HC 574 (10 May 2016).

[282]
House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights, The Government’s policy on the use of drones for targeted killing, Second Report of Session 2015–16, HL Paper 141 HC 574 (10 May 2016).

[283]
Human Rights Committee, General Comment 12 (1984), in , U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.1 at 12.

[284]
Human Rights Committee, General Comment 23, UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.5 (1994).

[285]
ICCPR.

[286]
International Law and Human Rights - PUBLG052.

[287]
Katangese Peoples’ Congress v. Zaire, ACmHPR Comm. 75/92 (1995).

[288]
Kitok v. Sweden, HRC Comm. No. 197/1985, UN Doc. A/43/40 (1988).

[289]
7AD. Memo from the President to national security advisors. National Security Archive.

[290]
2003. M.M. v. Netherlands, ECtHR, App. No 39339/98. European Court of Human Rights.

[291]
• Monim Elgak, Osman Hummeida and Amir Suliman (represented by FIDH and OMCT) v Sudan, African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Communication 379/09 (10 March, 2015).

[292]
Nada v. Switzerland, ECtHR App no 10593/08 (12 September 2012).

[293]
Necessary and Proportionate.

[294]
2003. New perspectives on the public-private divide. UBC Press.

[295]
Nicklinson & Lamb v. UK, ECtHR App. Nos. 1787/15 & 2478/15 (2015) .

[296]
7AD. OLC Memo for Alberto R. Gonzales. International Law of War Association.

[297]
22AD. OLC Memo for Alberto R. Gonzales & William J. Haynes II. Office of Legal Counsel.

[298]
OLC Memo for Alberto R. Gonzales, Counsel to the President, Re: Standards of Conduct for Interrogation Under 18 USC §§ 2340-2340A, August 1, 2002.

[299]
29AD. Öllinger v. Austria, ECtHR App. No. 76900/01. European Court of Human Rights.

[300]
Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, G.A. res. 63/117 (2008).

[301]
2009. Opuz v. Turkey, ECtHR, App. No. 33401/02. European Court of Human Rights.

[302]
1998. Osman v. UK, ECtHR, App No. 87/1997/871/1083. European Court of Human Rights.

[303]
24AD. Protocol No. 15 Amending the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.

[304]
R (Nicklinson & Another) v. Ministry of Justice, [2014] UKSC 38 (25 June).

[305]
R (Nicklinson & Another) v. Ministry of Justice, [2014] UKSC 38 (25 June).

[306]
Reference by the Governor in Council concerning Certain Questions relating to the Secession of Quebec from Canada ([1998] 2 Supreme Court Reporter (SCR) 217.

[307]
Report of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General on Kosovo’s future status, U.N. Doc. S/2007/168 (26 March, 2007).

[308]
Saramaka People v. Suriname, IACtHR Ser. C No. 172 (28 November, 2007).

[309]
2014. SAS v. France, ECtHR, App. No. 43835/11. European Court of Human Rights.

[310]
Statement of Attorney General Eric Holder on Closure of Investigation into the Interrogation of Certain Detainees, Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs (August 30, 2012).

[311]
2010. Symposium: International Human Rights and Climate Change. Georgia journal of international and comparative law. 38, 3 (2010), 511–797.

[312]
4AD. TBB v. Germany, Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Communication No. 48/2010, CERD/C/82/D/48/2010. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights.

[313]
The Human Rights Situation of Indigenous People in the Americas, IACmHR, OEA/Ser.L/V/II/108, Doc. 62 (2000).

[314]
The Independent International Commission on Kosovo, The Kosovo Report (2000).

[315]
The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age, Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, A/HRC/27/37 (June 30, 2014).

[316]
UNGA ‘Report of the Committee for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women’ (1998).

[317]
1985. X & Y v. Netherlands, ECtHR, App No. 8978/80. European Court of Human Rights.

[318]
Xákmok Kásek Indigenous Community v. Paraguay, IACtHR Ser. C No. 214 (24 August 2010).

Bibliography for PUBL0032: International Law and Human Rights : Dr Nathan Derejko BETA