Abella v. Argentina, Case 11.137, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Report No. 55/97. (1997). University of Minnesota Human Rights Library. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cases/1997/argentina55-97a.html
Abresch, W. (n.d.). A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights in Chechnya. European Journal of International Law, 16(4), 741–767. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi139
Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo (Request for Advisory Opinion), 2010 ICJ Rep 403 (22 July). (n.d.). https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/141/141-20100722-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf
Acevedo Buendía v. Perú, IACtHR (1 July, 2009). (n.d.). http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_198_ing.pdf
ACHPR. (n.d.). http://www.achpr.org/files/instruments/achpr/banjul_charter.pdf
Addis, Adeno. (n.d.). Individualism, Communitarianism, And The Rights Of Ethnic Minorities. The Notre Dame Law Review, 67(3), 615–676. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/tndl67&i=625
Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (Protocol of San Salvador) (1988). (n.d.). http://www.oas.org/dil/1988%20Additional%20Protocol%20to%20the%20American%20Convention%20on%20Human%20Rights%20in%20the%20Area%20of%20Economic,%20Social%20and%20Cultural%20Rights%20(Protocol%20of%20San%20Salvador).pdf
Advisory Opinion of the African Commission on Human and Peoples ’ Rights on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007). (n.d.). http://www.achpr.org/files/special-mechanisms/indigenous-populations/un_advisory_opinion_idp_eng.pdf
African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Banjul Charter / ACHPR) (1981). (n.d.). http://www.achpr.org/files/instruments/achpr/banjul_charter.pdf
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Principles and Guidelines on the Implementation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (November 2010). (n.d.-a). http://www.achpr.org/files/instruments/economic-social-cultural/achpr_instr_guide_draft_esc_rights_eng.pdf
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Principles and Guidelines on the Implementation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (November 2010). (n.d.-b). http://www.achpr.org/files/instruments/economic-social-cultural/achpr_instr_guide_draft_esc_rights_eng.pdf
Akehurst, M. (1975). The Hierarchy of the Sources of International Law. The British Year Book of International Law, 47(273), 281–285.
Alan Boyle,Christine Chinkin,. (n.d.). The Making of International Law. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780199213795.001.0001/law-9780199213795
Alan E. Boyle & C.M. Chinkin. (2007). The making of international law: Vol. Foundations of public international law. Oxford University Press.
Al-Jedda v. UK, ECtHR, [GC] App. no. 27021/08 (2011). (n.d.). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"dmdocnumber":["887954"],"itemid":["001-105612"]}
Al-Nashiri v. Poland, ECtHR, App no. 28761/11 (24 July, 2014). (n.d.). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044#{"itemid":["001-146044"]}
Alston, P. (n.d.-a). A Human Rights Perspective on the Millennium Development Goals. http://www.appg-popdevrh.org.uk/Publications/Population%20Hearings/Evidence/UNHCHR%20report%202.pdf
Alston, P. (n.d.-b). Study on Targeted Killings – Addendum to the Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/14session/A.HRC.14.24.Add6.pdf
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2012a). International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2012b). International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2012c). International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2012d). International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2012e). International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2012f). International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2012g). International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2012h). International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2012i). International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2012j). International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2012k). International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2012l). International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
Alston, P., & Goodman, R. (2012m). International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
McCann and others v.United Kingdom: European Court of Human Rights, Application No.18984/91 (Grand Chamber), 27 Sept.1995, International human rights: text and materials 922 (2012).
Alston, P., Goodman, R., & Steiner, H. J. (2012). International human rights: text and materials. Oxford University Press.
Alston, P., Hunt, P., Kälin, W., & Kothari, M. (n.d.). Report of UN Special Rapporteurs on Mission To Lebanon And Israel, UN Doc A/HRC/2/7. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G06/141/95/PDF/G0614195.pdf?OpenElement
Alston, P., Macdonald, E., & Academy of European Law. (2008). Human rights, intervention, and the use of force. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552719.003.0005
American Convention on Human Rights (Pact of San Jose / ACHR) (1969). (n.d.). http://www.oas.org/dil/treaties_B-32_American_Convention_on_Human_Rights.pdf
Andrew Clapham,. (n.d.). Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288465.001.0001
Antonio Cassese. (2005). International law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Apirana Mahuika v. New Zealand, Human Rights Committee, Comm. No. 547/1993, UN Doc. CCPR/C/70/D/547/1993 (2000). (n.d.). http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/547-1993.html
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, 2007 ICJ Rep 43 (2007). (n.d.). https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/91/091-20070226-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (DRC v. Uganda), ICJ Rep. 168. (2005). International Court of Justice. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&code=co&case=116&k=51/
Armstrong, J. D., Farrell, T., & Lambert, H. (2007). International law and international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, J. D., Farrell, T., & Lambert, H. (2012). International law and international relations: Vol. Themes in international relations (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894565
Arnold, R., & Quénivet, N. N. R. (2008). International humanitarian law and human rights law: towards a new merger in international law. Martinus Nijhoff.
Arosemena, G. (n.d.). Conflicts of rights in international human rights: A meta-rule analysis. Global Constitutionalism, 2(1), 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381712000214
Askin, K. D., & Koenig, D. M. (1999). Women and international human rights law (3rd ed). Transnational.
Aurel Sari. (2013). The Relationship Between Community Law and International Law after Kadi. In International law in a multipolar world: Vol. Routledge research in international law. Routledge.
Aust, A. (2013). Modern treaty law and practice (3rd ed). Cambridge University Press.
Aust, H. P. (2011). Complicity and the law of state responsibility: Vol. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511862632
Avbelj, M., Fontanelli, F., & Martinico, G. (Eds.). (2014). Kadi on trial: a multifaceted analysis of the Kadi trial. Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203796191
Başak Cali. (n.d.). Balancing Human Rights? Methodological Problems with Weights, Scales and Proportions. Human Rights Quarterly, 29(1), 251–270. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20072795
Başak Cali. (2010). International law for international relations. Oxford University Press.
Bassiouni, M. C., & Schabas, W. (Eds.). (2011). New challenges for the UN human rights machinery: what future for the UN treaty body system and the Human Rights Council procedures? Intersentia.
Belilos v. Switzerland, ECtHR App. No 10328/83 (1988). (n.d.). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"appno":["10328/83"],"itemid":["001-57434"]}
Benvenisti, E. (n.d.). Margin of Appreciation, Consensus and Universal Standards. New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 31(4), 843–854. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fnyuilp&collection=journals
Besson, S. (2010). Theorizing the Sources of International Law. In The philosophy of international law. Oxford University Press.
Beth A. Simmons & Richard H. Steinberg. (2006). International law and international relations: Vol. International organization books. Cambridge University Press.
Bianchi, A. (2008). Human Rights and the Magic of Jus Cogens. European Journal of International Law, 19(3), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn026
Bird, A. (2010). Third State Responsibility for Human Rights Violations. European Journal of International Law, 21(4), 883–900. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chq066
Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v Ireland (Application 45036/98) 42 EHRR 1, 19 BHRC 299. (2005). In Bosphorus v. Ireland, ECtHR, App no. 45036/98. European Court of Human Rights. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4J0Y-FKR0-TWW4-21GX&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
Bothe, M. (2001). The Protection of the Civilian Population and NATO Bombing on Yugoslavia: Comments on a Report to the Prosecutor of the ICTY. European Journal of International Law, 12(3), 531–536. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/12.3.531
Brady, A. D. P. (2012a). Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139003445
Brady, A. D. P. (2012b). Proportionality and deference under the UK Human Rights Act: an institutionally sensitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
Brems, E. & International Conference on Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights. (2008). Conflicts between fundamental rights. Intersentia.
Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th ed., 2012), James Crawford. (n.d.).
Bullard, A. (2008). Human rights in crisis. Ashgate.
Burns, W. C. G., & Osofsky, H. M. (2009). Adjudicating climate change: state, national, and international approaches. Cambridge University Press. http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3668531200004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. (n.d.-a). Extraterritorial jurisdiction. Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. http://business-humanrights.org/en/special-representative/un-secretary-generals-special-representative-on-business-human-rights/materials-by-topic/extraterritorial-jurisdiction
Cannizzaro, E., & Arsanjani, M. H. (2011). The law of treaties beyond the Vienna Convention. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588916.001.0001
Carozza, P. G. (n.d.). ‘My Friend Is a Stranger’: The Death Penalty and the Global Ius Commune of Human Rights. Texas Law Review, 81(4), 1031–1089. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=9240337&site=ehost-live
Carozza, P. G. (2008). Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights: A Reply. European Journal of International Law, 19(5), 931–944. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn059
Cass R. Sunstein. (1995). Rights and Their Critics. Notre Dame Law  Review, 70(4), 727–768. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=727&handle=hein.journals%2Ftndl70&collection=journals#735
Centre for Minority Rights Development (Kenya) and Minority Rights Group International on behalf of Endorois Welfare Council v. Kenya, Afr Comm’n HPR Case 276/03 (2010). (n.d.). http://www.achpr.org/files/sessions/46th/comunications/276.03/achpr46_276_03_eng.pdf
Charlesworth, H., & Chinkin, C. M. (2000). The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis: Vol. Melland Schill studies in international law. Manchester University Press.
Charlesworth, H., Chinkin, C., & Wright, S. (n.d.). Feminist Approaches to International Law. The American Journal of International Law, 85(4), 613–645. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2203269?origin=crossref
Chinkin, C. (1999). A critique of the public/private dimension. European Journal of International Law, 10(2), 387–395. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/10.2.387
CIA Office of General Counsel, Draft: Legal Appendix: Paragraph 5-Hostile Interrogations: Legal Considerations for CIA Officers, November 26, 2002. (n.d.).
Clapham, A. & Academy of European Law. (2006). Human rights obligations of non-state actors: Vol. v. 15/1. Oxford University Press.
Coard v. the United States of America, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Case 10.951. (1999). Organization of American States. https://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/99eng/Merits/UnitedStates10.951.htm
Committee Against Torture, General Comment No. 2, Implementation of article 2 by States Parties. (2007). University of Minnesota; Human Rights Library. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cat/general_comments/cat-gencom2.html
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 15 (2002). (n.d.). http://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838d11.html
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948). (n.d.-a). https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%2078/volume-78-I-1021-English.pdf
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948). (n.d.-b). https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%2078/volume-78-I-1021-English.pdf
Cordula Droege. (n.d.). The Interplay between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Armed Conflict. Israel Law Review, 40(2), 310–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700013376
Corten, O., & Klein, P. (2011). The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: a commentary. Oxford University Press.
• Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly, Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights. (3 C.E.). The Future of the European Court of Human Rights and the Brighton Declaration, AS/Jur. http://assembly.coe.int/CommitteeDocs/2012/ajdoc42_2012.pdf
Craven, M. C. R. (2002). The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: a perspective on its development: Vol. Oxford monographs in international law ([Paperback ed.]). Clarendon Press.
Crawford, J. R. (23 C.E.). The Identification of Customary International Law. Spring Conference of the ILA British Branch. http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ila-hq.org%2Fdownload.cfm%2Fdocid%2FBC985B09-ACEA-4356-AD31C90620705001&ei=oQokVMPjJJPKaN7IgJgG&usg=AFQjCNFUoRnjms2d6l4lAoiq_ucrCBANzQ&bvm=bv.76247554,d.d2s
d’Aspremont, J., & Dopagne, F. (2008). Kadi: The ECJ’s Reminder of the Elementary Divide between Legal Orders. International Organizations Law Review, 5(2), 371–379. https://doi.org/10.1163/157237408X412970
de Albuquerque, C. (n.d.). Chronicle of an Announced Birth: The Coming into Life of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights—The Missing Piece of the International Bill of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 32(1), 144–178. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.0.0137
de Burca, G. (n.d.). The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi. Harvard International Law Journal, 51, 1–49. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=1&handle=hein.journals%2Fhilj51&collection=journals#3
de Burca, G. (n.d.). The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order After Kadi. Harvard International Law Journal, 51(1), 1–49. https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_wos000274501900001&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,Gr%C3%A1The%20European%20Court%20of%20Justice%20and%20the%20International%20Legal%20Order%20after%20Kad&sortby=rank&offset=0
De Schutter, O., & et al. (n.d.). Commentary to the Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 34(4), 1084–1169. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2012.0063
de Wet, E., & Vidmar, J. (n.d.). Conflicts between international paradigms: Hierarchy versus systemic integration. Global Constitutionalism, 2(2), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381713000129
DE WET, E., & VIDMAR, J. (2013). Conflicts between international paradigms: Hierarchy versus systemic integration. Global Constitutionalism, 2(02), 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381713000129
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, GA Res 61/295 (2007. (n.d.). http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf
Dinah Shelton, The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law 2013. (n.d.-a). http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do;jsessionid=BBDE8C447BB987EEC948830E0037FE55?cs=frb&ct=frb&frbg=707356124&fctN=facet_frbrgroupid&fctV=707356124&doc=UCL_LMS_DS002234891&lastPag=&lastPagIndx=1&rfnGrp=frbr&frbrSrt=rank&frbrRecordsSource=Primo+Local&frbrJtitleDisplay=&frbrIssnDisplay=&frbrEissnDisplay=&frbrSourceidDisplay=UCL_LMS_DS&query=any%2Ccontains%2CDinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&indx=1&fn=search&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A(UCL)%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=false&ct=search&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=Dinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&dstmp=1508443362273&fromDL
Dinah Shelton, The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law 2013. (n.d.-b). http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do;jsessionid=BBDE8C447BB987EEC948830E0037FE55?cs=frb&ct=frb&frbg=707356124&fctN=facet_frbrgroupid&fctV=707356124&doc=UCL_LMS_DS002234891&lastPag=&lastPagIndx=1&rfnGrp=frbr&frbrSrt=rank&frbrRecordsSource=Primo+Local&frbrJtitleDisplay=&frbrIssnDisplay=&frbrEissnDisplay=&frbrSourceidDisplay=UCL_LMS_DS&query=any%2Ccontains%2CDinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&indx=1&fn=search&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A(UCL)%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=false&ct=search&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=Dinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&dstmp=1508443362273&fromDL
Dinstein, Y. (2016a). Lawful targets of attack. In The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict (pp. 102–138). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316389591.006
Dinstein, Y. (2016b). Prohibited weapons. In The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict (pp. 72–101). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316389591.005
Doswald-Beck, L., & Vité, S. (n.d.). International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law. International Review of the Red Cross, 33(293), 94–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020860400071539
Duffy, A. (2008). Expulsion to Face Torture? Non-refoulement in International Law. International Journal of Refugee Law, 20(3), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/een022
Easterly, W. (n.d.). How the Millennium Development Goals are Unfair to Africa. World Development, 37(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.02.009
Ed Bates. (n.d.). Avoiding Legal Obligations Created by Human Rights Treaties. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 57(4), 751–788. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20488253
Egan, S. (2011). The United Nations human rights treaty system: law and procedure. Bloomsbury Professional.
European Convention on Human Rights & Fundamental Freedoms. (1950). European Court of Human Rights. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/005.htm
European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (1950a). European Court of Human Rights. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer
European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (1950b). European Court of Human Rights. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer
European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (1950c). European Court of Human Rights. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer
Al-Saadoon & Mufdhi v UK, ECtHR (61498/08), (2 C.E.). http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:ihrl/3719echr10.case.1/law-ihrl-3719echr10
Hussein v. Albania & Others, ECtHR, Admissibility Decision, App no. 23276/04, (14 C.E.). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA622AAF0FA9211DA9D7CC210083E0BB2&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Al-Jedda v. UK, ECtHR, App. no. 27021/08, (7 C.E.). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IBB549B50AE9111E0A66DDBD3FF9A602D&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Ilaşcu v. Moldova and Russia, ECtHR, App no. 48787/99, (8 C.E.). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IC5FF47B1E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
El Masri v. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, ECtHR, App No. 39630/09, (13 C.E.). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I61847660F64A11E2879CAA2426866A35&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Kadi & Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council of the EU & Commission of the EU, ECJ C-402/05 P & C-415/05 P, (3 C.E.). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=IA427E020B5F311DDA170AC525BD9F690&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
European Commission v. Kadi, ECJ C-584/10 P & C-595/10 P, (18 C.E.). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I48A8EB6045D411E3B8A7AA586897ACCE&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Evans, M. D. (Ed.). (2018). International law (Fifth edition). Oxford University Press.
Eweida & others v. UK, ECtHR, App. Nos. 48420/10, 59842/10, 51671/10 and 36516/10. (2013). European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-115881#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-115881%22]}
Fassbender, B., Peters, A., Peter, S., & Högger, D. (2012). The Oxford handbook of the history of international law. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199599752.001.0001
Forsythe, D. P. (2012). Human rights in international relations: Vol. Themes in international relations (3rd ed). Cambridge University Press.
Foster, L., Jacobs, L. A., & Azmi, S. (2012). Balancing competing human rights claims in a diverse society: institutions, policy, principles. Irwin Law.
Gauri, V., & Brinks, D. M. (2008). Courting social justice: judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world. Cambridge University Press.
Geneva Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. (1949). International Committee of the Red Cross. http://www.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/375?OpenDocument
Geneva Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. (1949). International Committee of the Red Cross. http://www.icrc.org/ihl/385ec082b509e76c41256739003e636d/6756482d86146898c125641e004aa3c5
Ghandhi, P. R. (2010). Blackstone’s international human rights documents: Vol. Blackstone’s statutes series (7th ed). Oxford University Press.
Goekce v. Austria, Annex, U.N. Doc. CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005. (6 C.E.). CEDAW. http://www.iwraw-ap.org/protocol/doc/Sahide_Goekce_v_Austria.pdf
Goldsmith, J. L. (2012). Power and constraint: the accountable presidency after 9/11. W. W. Norton & Co.
Greenberg, K. J. (2009). The least worst place: Guantanamo’s first 100 days. Oxford University Press.
Guzman, A. T., & Meyer, T. L. (n.d.). International Common Law: The Soft law of International Tribunals. Chicago Journal of International Law, 9(2), 515–536. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fcjil&collection=journals
Hampson, F. (2005). The Relationship between International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2005/14. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/subcom/57/aevdoc.htm
Handyside v. UK, ECtHR, App. No. 5493/72. (1976). European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-57499#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57499%22]}
Harris, D. J., & Sivakumaran, S. (2015). Cases and materials on international law (Eighth edition). Sweet & Maxwell.
Hassan v. UK, ECtHR [GC], no. 29750/09 (2014). (2014). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-146501"]}
Heintze, H.-J. (n.d.). On the relationship between human rights law protection and international humanitarian law. Revue Internationale de La Croix-Rouge/International Review of the Red Cross, 86(856), 789–814. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1560775500180460
Higgins, R. (2000). Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Clarendon. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198764106.001.0001
Hilary Charlesworth & C.M. Chinkin. (2000). The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis: Vol. Melland Schill studies in international law. Manchester University Press, Juris.
House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights, The Government’s policy on the use of drones for targeted killing, Second Report of Session 2015–16, HL Paper 141 HC 574 (10 May 2016). (n.d.-a). https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201516/jtselect/jtrights/574/574.pdf
House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights, The Government’s policy on the use of drones for targeted killing, Second Report of Session 2015–16, HL Paper 141 HC 574 (10 May 2016). (n.d.-b). https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201516/jtselect/jtrights/574/574.pdf
Human Rights Committee,. (1994). General Comment No. 24: Issues relating to reservations made upon ratification or accession to the Covenant or the Optional Protocols thereto, or in relation to declarations under article 41 of the Covenant, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.6. https://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/hrcom24.htm
Human Rights Committee. (2004a). HRC, General Comment No. 31: Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. University of Minnesota Human Rights Library. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/hrcom31.html
Human Rights Committee. (2011a). General Comment 34, U.N. Doc CCPR/C/GC/34. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4ed34b562.html
Human Rights Committee, General Comment 12 (1984), in , U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.1 at 12. (n.d.). http://www.refworld.org/docid/453883f822.html
Human Rights Committee, General Comment 23, UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.5 (1994). (n.d.). http://www.refworld.org/docid/453883fc0.html
Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 31, Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13. (2004). University of Minnesota; Human Rights Library. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/hrcom31.html
Human Rights Watch. (n.d.-b). The EU’s Dirty Hands. http://www.hrw.org/reports/2011/09/21/eu-s-dirty-hands-0
Humphreys, S. (2010). Human rights and climate change. Cambridge Unviersity Press. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780511765520
ICCPR. (n.d.). http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. (2000a). Bámaca Velásquez v. Guatemala, Case No. 11/129 (Merits), Inter-Am. Ct. H.R., (Ser. C) No. 70. University of Minnesota Human Rights Library. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/iachr/C/70-ing.html
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. (n.d.-c). The Responsibility to Protect. http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICISS%20Report.pdf
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. (1965). http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CERD.aspx
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. (1966). Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CERD.aspx
International Council on Human Rights Policy. (2011b). Beyond Technology Transfer: Protecting Human Rights in a Climate-Constrained World. http://www.ichrp.org/
International Court of Justice. (28 C.E.). Advisory Opinion on Reservations to the Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&k=90&case=12&code=ppcg&p3=4
International Court of Justice. (2004b). Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep. 136. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&case=131&p3=4
International Court of Justice. (2004c). Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep. 136. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&case=131&p3=4
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. (n.d.-d). Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Appeal Judgement, Case No. IT-95-14-A. http://www.icty.org/case/blaskic/4
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. (n.d.-e). Prosecutor v. Gotovina, Appeals Judgment, Case No. IT-06-90-A. http://www.icty.org/x/cases/gotovina/acjug/en/121116_judgement.pdf
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. (2000b). Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. http://www.icty.org/sid/10052
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. (2003). Prosecutor v. Galić, Trial Judgment, Case No. IT-98-29-T. http://www.icty.org/x/cases/galic/acjug/en/gal-acjud061130.pdf
International Law and Human Rights - PUBLG052. (n.d.).
Isiksel, N. T. (n.d.). Fundamental rights in the EU after Kadi and Al Barakaat. European Law Journal, 16(5), 551–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00522.x
Isiksel, T. (n.d.). Global legal pluralism as fact and norm. Global Constitutionalism, 2(2), 160–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381713000130
Isiksel, T., & Thies, A. (n.d.). Changing subjects: Rights, remedies and responsibilities of individuals under global legal pluralism. Global Constitutionalism, 2(2), 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381713000117
Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (25 C.E.). Responding to Hizbullah attacks from Lebanon: Issues of proportionality. http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/aboutisrael/state/law/pages/responding%20to%20hizbullah%20attacks%20from%20lebanon-%20issues%20of%20proportionality%20july%202006.aspx
Johan Steyn. (n.d.). Guantanamo Bay: The Legal Black Hole. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 53(1), 1–15. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3663134
Katangese Peoples’ Congress v. Zaire, ACmHPR Comm. 75/92 (1995). (n.d.). http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/africa/comcases/75-92.html
Kennedy, D. (1997). A critique of adjudication: fin de siècle. Harvard University Press.
Kennedy, D. (2004). The dark sides of virtue: reassessing international humanitarianism. Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7rsjc
Kingsbury, B. (2002). Legal Positivism as Normative Politics: International Society, Balance of Power and Lassa Oppenheim’s Positive International Law. European Journal of International Law, 13(2), 401–437. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/13.2.401
Kitok v. Sweden, HRC Comm. No. 197/1985, UN Doc. A/43/40 (1988). (n.d.). http://www.worldcourts.com/hrc/eng/decisions/1988.07.27_Kitok_v_Sweden.htm
Klare, K. (1991). Legal Theory and Democratic Reconstruction. University of British Columbia Law Review, 25(1), 69–103. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fubclr&collection=journals
Klatt, M., & Meister, M. (2012a). Proportionality--a benefit to human rights? Remarks on the I.CON controversy. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10(3), 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos019
Klatt, M., & Meister, M. (2012b). The constitutional structure of proportionality. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662463.001.0001
Kokott, J., & Sobotta, C. (2012). The Kadi Case - Constitutional Core Values and International Law - Finding the Balance? European Journal of International Law, 23(4), 1015–1024. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chs063
Kolb, R. (n.d.-a). Selected Problems in the Theory of Customary International Law. Netherlands International Law Review, 50(2), 119–150. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X03001190
Kolb, R. (n.d.-b). The relationship between international humanitarian law and human rights law: A brief history of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the 1949 Geneva Conventions. International Review of the Red Cross, 38(324), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002086040009121X
Koskenniemi, M. (n.d.). Human Rights Mainstreaming as a Strategy for Institutional Power. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development, 1(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1353/hum.2010.0003
Koskenniemi, M. (1997). Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch. European Journal of International Law, 8(4), 566–582. http://ejil.oxfordjournals.org/content/8/4/566.abstract
Kretzmer, D. (n.d.). Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defence? European Journal of International Law, 16(2), 171–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi114
Krook, M. L. (2009). Quotas for women in politics: gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195375671.001.0001
Langford, M. (2008). Social rights jurisprudence: emerging trends in international and comparative law. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/social-rights-jurisprudence/E2DFA5FC0E55678CAF3BFF0B7D6B68AD
Las Palmeras v. Colombia (Preliminary Objections, February 4, 2000), Inter-Am. Ct. H.R., (Ser. C) No. 67. (2000). University of Minnesota Human Rights Library. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/iachr/C/67-ing.html
Levinson, S. (2004). Torture: a collection. Oxford University Press.
MacAskill, E., & Ball, J. (21 C.E.). UN surveillance resolution goes ahead despite attempts to dilute language. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/21/un-surveillance-resolution-us-uk-dilute-language
Madhav Khosla. (2010). Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights: A Reply. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8(2), 293–306. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=298&handle=hein.journals%2Finjcl8&collection=journals#302
Manjoo, R. (2011). Violence Against Women in the United States and the State’s Obligation to Protect. University of Virginia School of Law. http://www.reproductiverights.org/sites/crr.civicactions.net/files/documents/vaw.pdf
Marco Roscini. (n.d.). Targeting and Contemporary Aerial Bombardment. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 54(2), 411–443. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3663255
McCorquodale, R., & Simons, P. (n.d.). Responsibility beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law. The Modern Law Review, 70(4), 598–625. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4543156
McCrudden, C. (2008). Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law, 19(4), 655–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn043
Melzer, N. (2009). Interpretive guidance on the notion of direct participation in hostilities under international humanitarian law. International Committee of the Red Cross. http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/publication/p0990.htm
Memo from the President to national security advisors. (7 C.E.). National Security Archive. http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB127/02.02.07.pdf
Meron, T. (1989). Human rights and humanitarian norms as customary law. Clarendon. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198257455.001.0001
Meron, T. (1997). Convergence of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law. In Human rights and humanitarian law: the quest for universality: Vol. Nijhoff law specials. M. Nijhoff.
Meyersfeld, B. (2010). Domestic violence and international law. Hart.
Milanovic, M. (5 C.E.). CRC Concluding Observations on the Holy See. EJIL:Talk! http://www.ejiltalk.org/crc-concluding-observations-on-the-holy-see/
Milanovic, M. (25 C.E.). Foreign Surveillance and Human Rights: Introduction. EJIL:Talk! http://www.ejiltalk.org/foreign-surveillance-and-human-rights-introduction/
M.M. v. Netherlands, ECtHR, App. No 39339/98. (2003). European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-61002#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-61002%22]}
Moeckli, D., Shah, S., Sivakumaran, S., & Harris, D. J. (2014a). International human rights law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Moeckli, D., Shah, S., Sivakumaran, S., & Harris, D. J. (2014b). International human rights law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Moeckli, D., Shah, S., Sivakumaran, S., & Harris, D. J. (2014c). International human rights law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Moeckli, D., Shah, S., Sivakumaran, S., & Harris, D. J. (2014d). International human rights law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Moeckli, D., Shah, S., Sivakumaran, S., & Harris, D. J. (2014e). International human rights law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
Moeckli, D., Shah, S., Sivakumaran, S., & Harris, D. J. (2014f). International human rights law (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.
• Monim Elgak, Osman Hummeida and Amir Suliman (represented by FIDH and OMCT) v Sudan, African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Communication 379/09 (10 March, 2015). (n.d.). http://www.achpr.org/files/sessions/15th-eo/comunications/379.09/achpr15eos_decision_379_09_eng.pdf
Mullally, S. (n.d.). Domestic Violence Asylum Claims and Recent Developments in International Human Rights Law: A Progress Narrative? International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 60(2), 459–484. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589311000042
Nada v. Switzerland, ECtHR App no 10593/08 (12 September 2012). (n.d.). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113118#{"itemid":["001-113118"]}
Necessary and Proportionate. (n.d.). https://necessaryandproportionate.org/principles
Nelson, P. J. (n.d.). Human Rights, the Millennium Development Goals, and the Future of Development Cooperation. World Development, 35(12), 2041–2055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.006
New perspectives on the public-private divide: Vol. Legal dimensions series. (2003). UBC Press.
Nicklinson & Lamb v. UK, ECtHR App. Nos. 1787/15 & 2478/15 (2015) . (n.d.).
Nollkaemper, A., & Jacobs, D. (n.d.). Shared Responsibility in International Law. Michigan Journal of International Law, 34(2), 359–438. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/mjil34&i=371
Noyes, J. E., & Smith, B. D. (n.d.). State Responsibility and the Principle of Joint and Several Liability. The Yale Journal of International Law, 13(2), 225–267. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/yjil13&i=231
O’Connell, M. E., & Cogens, J. (2012). International Law’s Higher Ethical Norms. In The role of ethics in international law: Vol. ASIL studies in international legal theory. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978425
Office of the Assistant Attorney General, Memorandum for the Attorney General, July 16, 2010. (n.d.). http://www.washingtonpost.com/r/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2014/06/23/National- Security/Graphics/memodrones.pdf
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (15 C.E.). Report of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Relationship Between Climate Change and Human Rights, UN Doc. A/HRC/10/61. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Press/AnalyticalStudy.pdf
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1966a). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1966b). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1966c). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1966d). International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1966e). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. United Nations. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1966f). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. United Nations. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1966g). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. United Nations. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (1966h). International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. United Nations. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx
OLC Memo for Alberto R. Gonzales. (7 C.E.). International Law of War Association. http://lawofwar.org/Bush_torture_memo.htm
OLC Memo for Alberto R. Gonzales & William J. Haynes II. (22 C.E.). Office of Legal Counsel. http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/legacy/2009/08/24/memo-laws-taliban-detainees.pdf
OLC Memo for Alberto R. Gonzales, Counsel to the President, Re: Standards of Conduct for Interrogation Under 18 USC §§ 2340-2340A, August 1, 2002. (n.d.). http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/legacy/2010/08/05/memo-gonzales-aug2002.pdf
Olivier Corten,Pierre Klein,. (n.d.). The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780199546640.001.0001/law-9780199546640
Öllinger v. Austria, ECtHR App. No. 76900/01. (29 C.E.). European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-76098#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-76098%22]}
Onora O’Neill. (n.d.). The Dark Side of Human Rights. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 81(2), 427–439. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3568897
Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, G.A. res. 63/117 (2008). (n.d.). http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cescr/docs/A-RES-63-117.pdf
Opuz v. Turkey, ECtHR, App. No. 33401/02. (2009). European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-92945#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-92945%22]}
Orakhelashvili, A. (2008). The Interaction between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Fragmentation, Conflict, Parallelism, or Convergence? European Journal of International Law, 19(1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chm055
Organization of American States. (1948a). American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man. http://www.hrcr.org/docs/OAS_Declaration/oasrights.html
Örücü, E. & United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law. (2003). Judicial comparativism in human rights cases: Vol. United Kingdom comparative law series. United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law.
Osman v. UK, ECtHR, App No. 87/1997/871/1083. (1998). European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-58257#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-58257%22]}
Perreau-Saussine, A., & Murphy, J. B. (2007a). The nature of customary law. Cambridge University Press.
Perreau-Saussine, A., & Murphy, J. B. (Eds.). (2007b). The Nature of Customary Law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493744
Philip Alston. (n.d.). Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate Seen through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals. Human Rights Quarterly, 27(3), 755–829. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20069811
Pogge, T. W. M. (2008). World poverty and human rights: cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms (2nd ed). Polity.
Protocol (I) Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts. (1977). International Committee of the Red Cross. http://www.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/470
Protocol No. 13 to European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (2002). Council of Europe. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=187&CL=ENG
Protocol No. 15 Amending the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. (24 C.E.). http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/213.htm
R (Nicklinson & Another) v. Ministry of Justice, [2014] UKSC 38 (25 June). (n.d.-a). https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/uksc_2013_0235_judgment.pdf
R (Nicklinson & Another) v. Ministry of Justice, [2014] UKSC 38 (25 June). (n.d.-b). https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/uksc_2013_0235_judgment.pdf
Rainey, B., Wicks, E., Ovey, C., Jacobs, F. G., & White, R. C. A. (2017). Jacobs, White & Ovey: the European Convention on Human Rights (Seventh edition). Oxford University Press.
Reference by the Governor in Council concerning Certain Questions relating to the Secession of Quebec from Canada ([1998] 2 Supreme Court Reporter (SCR) 217. (n.d.). http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1643/index.do
Report of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General on Kosovo’s future status, U.N. Doc. S/2007/168 (26 March, 2007). (n.d.). https://www.osce.org/kosovo/24787?download=true
R.H. Helmholz. (n.d.). Natural Human Rights: The Perspective of the IUS Commune. Catholic University Law Review, 52(2). http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=301&handle=hein.journals%2Fcathu52&collection=journals#311
R.J. Vincent. (1986). Human rights and international relations. Published in association with the Royal Institute of International Affairs by Cambridge University Press.
Rosalyn Higgins. (1994). Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Clarendon Press.
Rosenberg, G. N. (2008). The hollow hope: can courts bring about social change? (2nd ed). University of Chicago.
Roth, K. (n.d.). Defending Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Practical Issues Faced by an International Human Rights Organization. 26(1).
Roth, K. (2004). Response to Leonard S. Rubenstein. Human Rights Quarterly, 26(4), 873–878. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2004.0055
Roth, K., Worden, M., & Bernstein, A. D. (2005). Torture: does it make us safer? Is it ever OK? : a human rights perspective. New Press in conjunction with Human Rights Watch.
Rubenstein, L. S. (2004). How International Human Rights Organizations Can Advance Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Response to Kenneth Roth. Human Rights Quarterly, 26(4), 845–865. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2004.0056
Ruggie, J. G. (n.d.). Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda. The American Journal of International Law, 101(4), 819–840. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40006320
Ryngaert, C. (n.d.). The European Court of Human Rights’ approach to the responsibility of member states in connection with acts of international organizations. International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 60(04), 997–1016. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589311000467
Sachs, J. D., & McArthur, J. W. (22 C.E.). The Millennium Project: a plan for meeting the Millennium Development Goals. Lancet, 365(9456), 347–353. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=15780027&site=ehost-live
Saith, A. (n.d.). From Universal Values to Millennium Development Goals: Lost in Translation. Development and Change, 37(6), 1167–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00518.x
Samuels, H. (n.d.). Feminizing Human Rights Adjudication: Feminist Method and the Proportionality Principle. Feminist Legal Studies, 21(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9225-6
Sands, P. (2008). Torture team: Rumsfeld’s memo and the betrayal of American values. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sands, P. P., Clapham, P. A., & Ghrálaigh, B. N. (n.d.). Legal Opinion: The Lawfulness of the Authorisation by the United Kingdom of Weapons and Related Items for Export to Saudi Arabia in the Context of Saudi Arabia’s Military Intervention in Yemen (11 December, 2015). https://www.amnesty.org.uk/files/webfm/Documents/issues/final_legal_opinion_saudi_arabia_18_december_2015_-_final.pdf
Saramaka People v. Suriname, IACtHR Ser. C No. 172 (28 November, 2007). (n.d.). http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_172_ing.pdf
SAS v. France, ECtHR, App. No. 43835/11. (2014). European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-145466#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-145466%22]}
Saul, B., Kinley, D., & Mowbray, J. (2014). The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: commentary, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780199640300.001.0001/law-9780199640300
Schutter, O. de. (2014). International human rights law: cases, materials, commentary (Second edition). Cambridge University Press.
Sepúlveda, M. M. (2003). The nature of the obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Vol. School of Human Rights Research series. Intersentia.
Shaw, M. N. (2003). International Law. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051903
Shaw, M. N. (2017). International law (Eighth edition). Cambridge University Press.
Shelton, D. (2008). Regional protection of human rights. Oxford University Press.
Shelton, D. (Ed.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of international human rights law: Vol. Oxford handbooks in law. Oxford University Press. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780199640133.001.0001/law-9780199640133
Shue, H. (1996). Basic rights: subsistence, affluence, and U.S. foreign policy (2nd ed). Princeton University Press.
Smith, R. K. M. (2013). Texts and materials on international human rights (3rd ed). Routledge.
Statement of Attorney General Eric Holder on Closure of Investigation into the Interrogation of Certain Detainees, Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs (August 30, 2012). (n.d.). http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/statement-attorney-general-eric-holder-closure-investigation-interrogation-certain-detainees
Stavros Tsakyrakis. (2009). Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights? International Journal of Constitutional Law, 7(3), 468–493. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=468&handle=hein.journals%2Finjcl7&collection=journals#474
Stavros Tsakyrakis. (2010). Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights: A Rejoinder to Madhav Khosla. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 8(2), 307–310. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=307&handle=hein.journals%2Finjcl8&collection=journals#311
Stone Sweet, A. (n.d.). A cosmopolitan legal order: Constitutional pluralism and rights adjudication in Europe. Global Constitutionalism, 1(1), 53–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381711000062
Smith (No. 2) v. Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41, (19 C.E.). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/ext/app/document?crumb-action=reset&docguid=I86722C10D8D111E2B4EC91F9DB95B3F4&entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth
Supreme Court of Israel. (2006). Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. Israel, Supreme Court of Israel, HCJ 769/02. Hague Justice Portal. http://www.haguejusticeportal.net/Docs/NLP/Israel/Targetted_Killings_Supreme_Court_13-12-2006.pdf
Sweet, A. S., & Matthews, J. (2008). Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 47. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=72&handle=hein.journals%2Fcjtl47&collection=journals#74
Symposium: International Human Rights and Climate Change. (2010). Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 38(3), 511–797. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/gjicl38&i=521
Tara Melish. (2002). Protecting economic, social and cultural rights in the Inter-American human rights system. Centro de Derechos Económicos y Sociales. https://law.yale.edu/system/files/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/MANUAL_OAS_INGLES.pdf
TBB v. Germany, Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Communication No. 48/2010, CERD/C/82/D/48/2010. (4 C.E.). Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://www2.ohchr.org/English/bodies/cerd/docs/CERD-C-82-D-48-2010-English.pdf
The Human Rights Situation of Indigenous People in the Americas, IACmHR, OEA/Ser.L/V/II/108, Doc. 62 (2000). (n.d.). http://www.cidh.org/Indigenas/TOC.htm
The Independent International Commission on Kosovo, The Kosovo Report (2000). (n.d.). http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/6D26FF88119644CFC1256989005CD392-thekosovoreport.pdf
The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age, Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, A/HRC/27/37 (June 30, 2014). (n.d.). https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCEQFjAAahUKEwias4aYjf_HAhXFfhoKHXC5BFM&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ohchr.org%2FEN%2FHRBodies%2FHRC%2FRegularSessions%2FSession27%2FDocuments%2FA-HRC-27-37_en.doc&usg=AFQjCNEV939mQ6D32744AZQmPV2V0ucLuA&sig2=s-h3KVwWowHyQFrfcxGadA
The White House. (n.d.-f). U.S. Policy Standards and Procedures for the Use of Force in Counterterrorism Operations Outside the United States and Areas of Active Hostilities. The White House. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/fact-sheet-us-policy-standards-and-procedures-use-force-counterterrorism
Theodor Meron. (n.d.). The Humanization of Humanitarian Law. The American Journal of International Law, 94(2), 239–278. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2555292
Thomas Nagel. (n.d.). The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33(2), 113–147. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3558011
Travis, P., & et al. (n.d.). Overcoming health-systems constraints to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. The Lancet, 364(9437), 900–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16987-0
Tushnet, M. V. (2008). Weak courts, strong rights: judicial review and social welfare rights in comparative constitutional law. Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7s5kr
U.N. General Assembly. (20 C.E.). General Assembly Third Committee, The Right to Privacy in a Digital Age, UN Doc. A/C.3/68/L.45. United Nations. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/N13/576/77/PDF/N1357677.pdf?OpenElement
UNGA ‘Report of the Committee for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women’ (1998). (n.d.). http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/reports/18report.pdf
United Nations. (1945). UN Charter. United Nations. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/ctc/uncharter.pdf
United Nations. (1948). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/
United Nations. (1948b). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. United Nations. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
United Nations. (1979). Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). UN Women. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/
United Nations. (1984). Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CAT.aspx
United Nations. (2001). Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. International Law Commission. http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%20articles/9_6_2001.pdf
United Nations. (2009). Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 20, Non-Discrimination in Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (art. 2, para. 2) U.N. Doc. E/C.12/GC/20. University of Minnesota Human Rights Library. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/escgencom20.html
United Nations. (2011). International legal protection of human rights in armed conflict. United Nations.
U.S. Department of State. (n.d.-g). Fourth Periodic Report of the United States of America to the United Nations Committee on Human Rights Concerning the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. U.S. Department of State. http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/179781.htm
Uvin, P. (2004). Human rights and development. Kumarian Press.
van Elsuwege, P. (2012). New challenges for pluralist adjudication after Lisbon: the protection of fundamental rights in a Ius commune Europaeum. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 30(2), 195–217. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fnethqur&collection=journals
Venice Commission. (17 C.E.). Opinion on the International Legal Obligations of Council of Europe member states in respect of secret detention facilities and inter-state transport of prisoners, Opinion No. 363/2005, Doc. CDL-AD(2006)009. http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2006)009-e
Vincent, R. J. (1987). Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598814
Virgílio Afonso da Silva. (n.d.). Comparing the Incommensurable: Constitutional Principles, Balancing and Rational Decision. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 31(2), 273–301. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=61047869&site=ehost-live
Vizard, P. (2006). Poverty and human rights: Sen’s ‘capability perspective’ explored. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273874.001.0001
Watkin, K. (n.d.). Controlling the Use of Force: A Role for Human Rights Norms in Contemporary Armed Conflict. The American Journal of International Law, 98(1), 1–34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3139252?origin=crossref
White, L., & Perelman, J. (2011). Stones of hope: how African activists reclaim human rights to challenge global poverty: Vol. Stanford studies in human rights. Stanford University Press.
White, R. C. A., Ovey, C., Jacobs, F. G., & Ovey, C. (2010). The European Convention on Human Rights (5th ed). Oxford University Press.
X & Y v. Netherlands, ECtHR, App No. 8978/80. (1985). European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-57603#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57603%22]}
Xákmok Kásek Indigenous Community v. Paraguay, IACtHR Ser. C No. 214 (24 August 2010). (n.d.). http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_214_ing.pdf
Yamin, A. E., & Gloppen, S. (2011). Litigating health rights: can courts bring more justice to health? Vol. Human Rights Program series. Harvard University Press.
Yamin, A. E., & Parra-Vera, O. (n.d.). Judicial protection of the right to health in Colombia: From social demands to individual claims to public debates. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 33(2), 431–459. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?lname=&public=false&collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/hasint33&men_hide=false&men_tab=toc&kind=&page=431
Young, K. G. (2012). Constituting economic and social rights: Vol. Oxford constitutional theory. Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641932.001.0001
Young, K. G., & Lemaitre, J. (2013). The Comparative Fortunes of the Right to Health: Two Tales of Justiciability in Colombia and South Africa. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 26(1), 179–216. http://harvardhrj.com/archive/
Ziegler, K. S. (2009). Strengthening the Rule of Law, but Fragmenting International Law: The Kadi Decision of the ECJ from the Perspective of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 9(2), 288–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngp010