‘Abella v. Argentina, Case 11.137, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Report No. 55/97’. 1997. University of Minnesota Human Rights Library. 1997. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cases/1997/argentina55-97a.html.
Abresch, William. n.d. ‘A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights in Chechnya’. European Journal of International Law 16 (4): 741–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi139.
‘Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo (Request for Advisory Opinion), 2010 ICJ Rep 403 (22 July)’. n.d. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/141/141-20100722-ADV-01-00-EN.pdf.
‘Acevedo Buendía v. Perú, IACtHR (1 July, 2009)’. n.d. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_198_ing.pdf.
‘ACHPR’. n.d. http://www.achpr.org/files/instruments/achpr/banjul_charter.pdf.
Addis, Adeno. n.d. ‘Individualism, Communitarianism, And The Rights Of Ethnic Minorities’. The Notre Dame Law Review 67 (3): 615–76. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/tndl67&i=625.
‘Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (Protocol of San Salvador) (1988)’. n.d. http://www.oas.org/dil/1988%20Additional%20Protocol%20to%20the%20American%20Convention%20on%20Human%20Rights%20in%20the%20Area%20of%20Economic,%20Social%20and%20Cultural%20Rights%20(Protocol%20of%20San%20Salvador).pdf.
‘Advisory Opinion of the African Commission on Human and Peoples ’ Rights on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007)’. n.d. http://www.achpr.org/files/special-mechanisms/indigenous-populations/un_advisory_opinion_idp_eng.pdf.
‘African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Banjul Charter / ACHPR) (1981)’. n.d. http://www.achpr.org/files/instruments/achpr/banjul_charter.pdf.
‘African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Principles and Guidelines on the Implementation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (November 2010)’. n.d. http://www.achpr.org/files/instruments/economic-social-cultural/achpr_instr_guide_draft_esc_rights_eng.pdf.
‘———’. n.d. http://www.achpr.org/files/instruments/economic-social-cultural/achpr_instr_guide_draft_esc_rights_eng.pdf.
Akehurst, Michael. 1975. ‘The Hierarchy of the Sources of International Law’. The British Year Book of International Law 47 (273): 281–85.
Alan Boyle,Christine Chinkin,. n.d. The Making of International Law. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780199213795.001.0001/law-9780199213795.
Alan E. Boyle and C.M. Chinkin. 2007. The Making of International Law. Vol. Foundations of public international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Albuquerque, Catarina de. n.d. ‘Chronicle of an Announced Birth: The Coming into Life of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights—The Missing Piece of the International Bill of Human Rights’. Human Rights Quarterly 32 (1): 144–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.0.0137.
‘Al-Jedda v. UK, ECtHR, [GC] App. No. 27021/08 (2011)’. n.d. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"dmdocnumber":["887954"],"itemid":["001-105612"]}.
‘Al-Nashiri v. Poland, ECtHR, App No. 28761/11 (24 July, 2014)’. n.d. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044#{"itemid":["001-146044"]}.
Alston, Philip. n.d. ‘A Human Rights Perspective on the Millennium Development Goals’. http://www.appg-popdevrh.org.uk/Publications/Population%20Hearings/Evidence/UNHCHR%20report%202.pdf.
———. n.d. ‘Study on Targeted Killings – Addendum to the Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions’. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrcouncil/docs/14session/A.HRC.14.24.Add6.pdf.
Alston, Philip, and Ryan Goodman. 2012a. International Human Rights: Text and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012b. International Human Rights: Text and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012c. International Human Rights: Text and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012d. International Human Rights: Text and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012e. International Human Rights: Text and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012f. International Human Rights: Text and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012g. International Human Rights: Text and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012h. International Human Rights: Text and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012i. International Human Rights: Text and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012j. International Human Rights: Text and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012k. International Human Rights: Text and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012l. International Human Rights: Text and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012m. International Human Rights: Text and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2012n. McCann and others v.United Kingdom: European Court of Human Rights, Application No.18984/91 (Grand Chamber), 27 Sept.1995 International human rights: text and materials 922–25.
Alston, Philip, Ryan Goodman, and Henry J. Steiner. 2012. International Human Rights: Text and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Alston, Philip, Paul Hunt, Walter Kälin, and Miloon Kothari. n.d. ‘Report of UN Special Rapporteurs on Mission To Lebanon And Israel, UN Doc A/HRC/2/7’. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G06/141/95/PDF/G0614195.pdf?OpenElement.
Alston, Philip, Euan Macdonald, and Academy of European Law. 2008. Human Rights, Intervention, and the Use of Force. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552719.003.0005.
‘American Convention on Human Rights (Pact of San Jose / ACHR) (1969)’. n.d. http://www.oas.org/dil/treaties_B-32_American_Convention_on_Human_Rights.pdf.
Andrew Clapham,. n.d. Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288465.001.0001.
Antonio Cassese. 2005. International Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
‘Apirana Mahuika v. New Zealand, Human Rights Committee, Comm. No. 547/1993, UN Doc. CCPR/C/70/D/547/1993 (2000)’. n.d. http://hrlibrary.umn.edu/undocs/547-1993.html.
‘Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, 2007 ICJ Rep 43 (2007)’. n.d. https://www.icj-cij.org/files/case-related/91/091-20070226-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf.
‘Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (DRC v. Uganda), ICJ Rep. 168’. 2005. International Court of Justice. 2005. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&code=co&case=116&k=51/.
Armstrong, J. D., Theo Farrell, and Hélène Lambert. 2007. International Law and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, J.D., Theo Farrell, and Hélène Lambert. 2012. International Law and International Relations. 2nd ed. Vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511894565.
Arnold, Roberta, and Noëlle N.R. Quénivet. 2008. International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law: Towards a New Merger in International Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
Arosemena, Gustavo. n.d. ‘Conflicts of Rights in International Human Rights: A Meta-Rule Analysis’. Global Constitutionalism 2 (1): 6–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381712000214.
Askin, Kelly Dawn, and Dorean Marguerite Koenig. 1999. Women and International Human Rights Law. 3rd ed. Ardsley, N. Y.: Transnational.
Aspremont, Jean d’, and Frédéric Dopagne. 2008. ‘Kadi: The ECJ’s Reminder of the Elementary Divide between Legal Orders’. International Organizations Law Review 5 (2): 371–79. https://doi.org/10.1163/157237408X412970.
Aurel Sari. 2013. ‘The Relationship Between Community Law and International Law after Kadi’. In International Law in a Multipolar World. Vol. Routledge research in international law. London: Routledge.
Aust, Anthony. 2013. Modern Treaty Law and Practice. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Aust, Helmut Philipp. 2011. Complicity and the Law of State Responsibility. Vol. Cambridge studies in international and comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511862632.
Avbelj, Matej, Filippo Fontanelli, and Giuseppe Martinico, eds. 2014. Kadi on Trial: A Multifaceted Analysis of the Kadi Trial. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203796191.
Başak Cali. 2010. International Law for International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. n.d. ‘Balancing Human Rights? Methodological Problems with Weights, Scales and Proportions’. Human Rights Quarterly 29 (1): 251–70. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20072795.
Bassiouni, M. Cherif, and William Schabas, eds. 2011. New Challenges for the UN Human Rights Machinery: What Future for the UN Treaty Body System and the Human Rights Council Procedures? Cambridge: Intersentia.
‘Belilos v. Switzerland, ECtHR App. No 10328/83 (1988)’. n.d. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"appno":["10328/83"],"itemid":["001-57434"]}.
Benvenisti, Eyal. n.d. ‘Margin of Appreciation, Consensus and Universal Standards’. New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 31 (4): 843–54. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fnyuilp&collection=journals.
Besson, Samantha. 2010. ‘Theorizing the Sources of International Law’. In The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beth A. Simmons and Richard H. Steinberg. 2006. International Law and International Relations. Vol. International organization books. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bianchi, Andrea. 2008. ‘Human Rights and the Magic of Jus Cogens’. European Journal of International Law 19 (3): 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn026.
Bird, Annie. 2010. ‘Third State Responsibility for Human Rights Violations’. European Journal of International Law 21 (4): 883–900. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chq066.
Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v Ireland (Application 45036/98) 42 EHRR 1, 19 BHRC 299. 2005. Bosphorus v. Ireland, ECtHR, App No. 45036/98. European Court of Human Rights. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4J0Y-FKR0-TWW4-21GX&csi=279841&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
Bothe, Michael. 2001. ‘The Protection of the Civilian Population and NATO Bombing on Yugoslavia: Comments on a Report to the Prosecutor of the ICTY’. European Journal of International Law 12 (3): 531–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/12.3.531.
Brady, Alan D. P. 2012a. Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139003445.
———. 2012b. Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act: An Institutionally Sensitive Approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Brems, Eva and International Conference on Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights. 2008. Conflicts between Fundamental Rights. Antwerp: Intersentia.
Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th Ed., 2012), James Crawford. n.d.
Bullard, Alice. 2008. Human Rights in Crisis. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Burca, Grainne de. n.d. ‘The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi’. Harvard International Law Journal 51: 1–49. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=1&handle=hein.journals%2Fhilj51&collection=journals#3.
Burns, William C. G., and Hari M. Osofsky. 2009. Adjudicating Climate Change: State, National, and International Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3668531200004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760.
Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. n.d. ‘Extraterritorial Jurisdiction’. Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. http://business-humanrights.org/en/special-representative/un-secretary-generals-special-representative-on-business-human-rights/materials-by-topic/extraterritorial-jurisdiction.
Cannizzaro, Enzo, and Mahnoush H. Arsanjani. 2011. The Law of Treaties beyond the Vienna Convention. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199588916.001.0001.
Carozza, Paolo G. 2008. ‘Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights: A Reply’. European Journal of International Law 19 (5): 931–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn059.
———. n.d. ‘“My Friend Is a Stranger”: The Death Penalty and the Global Ius Commune of Human Rights’. Texas Law Review 81 (4): 1031–89. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=9240337&site=ehost-live.
Cass R. Sunstein. 1995. ‘Rights and Their Critics’. Notre Dame Law  Review 70 (4): 727–68. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=727&handle=hein.journals%2Ftndl70&collection=journals#735.
‘Centre for Minority Rights Development (Kenya) and Minority Rights Group International on Behalf of Endorois Welfare Council v. Kenya, Afr Comm’n HPR Case 276/03 (2010)’. n.d. http://www.achpr.org/files/sessions/46th/comunications/276.03/achpr46_276_03_eng.pdf.
Charlesworth, Hilary, Christine Chinkin, and Shelley Wright. n.d. ‘Feminist Approaches to International Law’. The American Journal of International Law 85 (4): 613–45. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/2203269?origin=crossref.
Charlesworth, Hilary, and C.M. Chinkin. 2000. The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis. Vol. Melland Schill studies in international law. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Chinkin, Christine. 1999. ‘A Critique of the Public/Private Dimension’. European Journal of International Law 10 (2): 387–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/10.2.387.
‘CIA Office of General Counsel, Draft: Legal Appendix: Paragraph 5-Hostile Interrogations: Legal Considerations for CIA Officers, November 26, 2002’. n.d.
Clapham, Andrew and Academy of European Law. 2006. Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors. Vol. v. 15/1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
‘Coard v. the United States of America, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Case 10.951’. 1999. Organization of American States. 1999. https://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/99eng/Merits/UnitedStates10.951.htm.
‘Committee Against Torture, General Comment No. 2, Implementation of Article 2 by States Parties’. 2007. University of Minnesota; Human Rights Library. 2007. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cat/general_comments/cat-gencom2.html.
‘Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 15 (2002)’. n.d. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4538838d11.html.
‘Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948)’. n.d. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%2078/volume-78-I-1021-English.pdf.
‘———’. n.d. https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%2078/volume-78-I-1021-English.pdf.
Cordula Droege. n.d. ‘The Interplay between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Armed Conflict’. Israel Law Review 40 (2): 310–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021223700013376.
Corten, Olivier, and Pierre Klein. 2011. The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly, Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights. 3AD. ‘The Future of the European Court of Human Rights and the Brighton Declaration, AS/Jur’. http://assembly.coe.int/CommitteeDocs/2012/ajdoc42_2012.pdf.
Craven, Matthew C. R. 2002. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Perspective on Its Development. [Paperback ed.]. Vol. Oxford monographs in international law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Crawford, James R. 23AD. ‘The Identification of Customary International Law’. Spring Conference of the ILA British Branch. http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ila-hq.org%2Fdownload.cfm%2Fdocid%2FBC985B09-ACEA-4356-AD31C90620705001&ei=oQokVMPjJJPKaN7IgJgG&usg=AFQjCNFUoRnjms2d6l4lAoiq_ucrCBANzQ&bvm=bv.76247554,d.d2s.
de Burca, G. n.d. ‘The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order After Kadi’. Harvard International Law Journal 51 (1): 1–49. https://ucl-new-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=TN_wos000274501900001&context=PC&vid=UCL_VU2&lang=en_US&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&adaptor=primo_central_multiple_fe&tab=local&query=any,contains,Gr%C3%A1The%20European%20Court%20of%20Justice%20and%20the%20International%20Legal%20Order%20after%20Kad&sortby=rank&offset=0.
De Schutter, Olivier, and et al. n.d. ‘Commentary to the Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’. Human Rights Quarterly 34 (4): 1084–1169. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2012.0063.
DE WET, ERIKA, and JURE VIDMAR. 2013. ‘Conflicts between International Paradigms: Hierarchy versus Systemic Integration’. Global Constitutionalism 2 (02): 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381713000129.
‘Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, GA Res 61/295 (2007’. n.d. http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf.
‘Dinah Shelton, The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law 2013’. n.d. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do;jsessionid=BBDE8C447BB987EEC948830E0037FE55?cs=frb&ct=frb&frbg=707356124&fctN=facet_frbrgroupid&fctV=707356124&doc=UCL_LMS_DS002234891&lastPag=&lastPagIndx=1&rfnGrp=frbr&frbrSrt=rank&frbrRecordsSource=Primo+Local&frbrJtitleDisplay=&frbrIssnDisplay=&frbrEissnDisplay=&frbrSourceidDisplay=UCL_LMS_DS&query=any%2Ccontains%2CDinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&indx=1&fn=search&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A(UCL)%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=false&ct=search&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=Dinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&dstmp=1508443362273&fromDL.
‘———’. n.d. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do;jsessionid=BBDE8C447BB987EEC948830E0037FE55?cs=frb&ct=frb&frbg=707356124&fctN=facet_frbrgroupid&fctV=707356124&doc=UCL_LMS_DS002234891&lastPag=&lastPagIndx=1&rfnGrp=frbr&frbrSrt=rank&frbrRecordsSource=Primo+Local&frbrJtitleDisplay=&frbrIssnDisplay=&frbrEissnDisplay=&frbrSourceidDisplay=UCL_LMS_DS&query=any%2Ccontains%2CDinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&indx=1&fn=search&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A(UCL)%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=false&ct=search&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=Dinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&dstmp=1508443362273&fromDL.
Dinstein, Yoram. 2016a. ‘Lawful Targets of Attack’. In The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict, 102–38. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316389591.006.
———. 2016b. ‘Prohibited Weapons’. In The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict, 72–101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316389591.005.
Doswald-Beck, Louise, and Sylvain Vité. n.d. ‘International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law’. International Review of the Red Cross 33 (293): 94–119. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020860400071539.
Duffy, Aoife. 2008. ‘Expulsion to Face Torture? Non-Refoulement in International Law’. International Journal of Refugee Law 20 (3): 373–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijrl/een022.
Easterly, William. n.d. ‘How the Millennium Development Goals Are Unfair to Africa’. World Development 37 (1): 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.02.009.
Ed Bates. n.d. ‘Avoiding Legal Obligations Created by Human Rights Treaties’. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 57 (4): 751–88. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20488253.
Egan, Suzanne. 2011. The United Nations Human Rights Treaty System: Law and Procedure. Haywards Heath: Bloomsbury Professional.
Elsuwege, Peter van. 2012. ‘New Challenges for Pluralist Adjudication after Lisbon: The Protection of Fundamental Rights in a Ius Commune Europaeum’. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 30 (2): 195–217. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fnethqur&collection=journals.
‘European Convention on Human Rights & Fundamental Freedoms’. 1950. European Court of Human Rights. 1950. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/005.htm.
‘European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’. 1950a. European Court of Human Rights. 1950. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer.
‘———’. 1950b. European Court of Human Rights. 1950. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer.
‘———’. 1950c. European Court of Human Rights. 1950. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer.
European Court of Human Rights. 2AD. Al-Saadoon & Mufdhi v UK, ECtHR (61498/08).
———. 14AD. Hussein v. Albania & Others, ECtHR, Admissibility Decision, App no. 23276/04.
European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber). 7AD. Al-Jedda v. UK, ECtHR, App. no. 27021/08.
———. 8AD. Ilaşcu v. Moldova and Russia, ECtHR, App no. 48787/99.
———. 13AD. El Masri v. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, ECtHR, App No. 39630/09.
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber). 3AD. Kadi & Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council of the EU & Commission of the EU, ECJ C-402/05 P & C-415/05 P.
———. 18AD. European Commission v. Kadi, ECJ C-584/10 P & C-595/10 P.
Evans, Malcolm D., ed. 2018. International Law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
‘Eweida & Others v. UK, ECtHR, App. Nos. 48420/10, 59842/10, 51671/10 and 36516/10’. 2013. European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-115881#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-115881%22]}.
Fassbender, Bardo, Anne Peters, Simone Peter, and Daniel Högger. 2012. The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199599752.001.0001.
Forsythe, David P. 2012. Human Rights in International Relations. 3rd ed. Vol. Themes in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Foster, Lorne, Lesley A. Jacobs, and Shaheen Azmi. 2012. Balancing Competing Human Rights Claims in a Diverse Society: Institutions, Policy, Principles. Toronto: Irwin Law.
Gauri, Varun, and Daniel M. Brinks. 2008. Courting Social Justice: Judicial Enforcement of Social and Economic Rights in the Developing World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
‘Geneva Convention (III) Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War’. 1949. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1949. http://www.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/375?OpenDocument.
‘Geneva Convention (IV) Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War’. 1949. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1949. http://www.icrc.org/ihl/385ec082b509e76c41256739003e636d/6756482d86146898c125641e004aa3c5.
Ghandhi, P. R. 2010. Blackstone’s International Human Rights Documents. 7th ed. Vol. Blackstone’s statutes series. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
‘Goekce v. Austria, Annex, U.N. Doc. CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005’. 6AD. CEDAW. http://www.iwraw-ap.org/protocol/doc/Sahide_Goekce_v_Austria.pdf.
Goldsmith, Jack L. 2012. Power and Constraint: The Accountable Presidency after 9/11. New York: W. W. Norton & Co.
Greenberg, Karen J. 2009. The Least Worst Place: Guantanamo’s First 100 Days. New York: Oxford University Press.
Guzman, Andrew T., and Timothy L. Meyer. n.d. ‘International Common Law: The Soft Law of International Tribunals’. Chicago Journal of International Law 9 (2): 515–36. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fcjil&collection=journals.
Hampson, Françoise. 2005. ‘The Relationship between International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2005/14’. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 2005. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/subcom/57/aevdoc.htm.
‘Handyside v. UK, ECtHR, App. No. 5493/72’. 1976. European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-57499#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57499%22]}.
Harris, D. J., and Sandesh Sivakumaran. 2015. Cases and Materials on International Law. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
‘Hassan v. UK, ECtHR [GC], No. 29750/09 (2014)’. 2014. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"documentcollectionid2":["GRANDCHAMBER","CHAMBER"],"itemid":["001-146501"]}.
Heintze, Hans-Joachim. n.d. ‘On the Relationship between Human Rights Law Protection and International Humanitarian Law’. Revue Internationale de La Croix-Rouge/International Review of the Red Cross 86 (856): 789–814. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1560775500180460.
Higgins, Rosalyn. 2000. Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It. Oxford: Clarendon. https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198764106.001.0001.
Hilary Charlesworth and C.M. Chinkin. 2000. The Boundaries of International Law: A Feminist Analysis. Vol. Melland Schill studies in international law. Manchester: Manchester University Press, Juris.
‘House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights, The Government’s Policy on the Use of Drones for Targeted Killing, Second Report of Session 2015–16, HL Paper 141 HC 574 (10 May 2016)’. n.d. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201516/jtselect/jtrights/574/574.pdf.
‘———’. n.d. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201516/jtselect/jtrights/574/574.pdf.
Human Rights Committee,. 1994. ‘General Comment No. 24: Issues Relating to Reservations Made upon Ratification or Accession to the Covenant or the Optional Protocols Thereto, or in Relation to Declarations under Article 41 of the Covenant, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.6’. 1994. https://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/hrcom24.htm.
Human Rights Committee. 2004a. ‘HRC, General Comment No. 31: Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’. University of Minnesota Human Rights Library. 2004. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/hrcom31.html.
———. 2011a. ‘General Comment 34, U.N. Doc CCPR/C/GC/34’. 2011. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4ed34b562.html.
‘Human Rights Committee, General Comment 12 (1984), in , U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.1 at 12’. n.d. http://www.refworld.org/docid/453883f822.html.
‘Human Rights Committee, General Comment 23, UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.5 (1994)’. n.d. http://www.refworld.org/docid/453883fc0.html.
‘Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 31, Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13’. 2004. University of Minnesota; Human Rights Library. 2004. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/hrcom31.html.
Human Rights Watch. n.d. ‘The EU’s Dirty Hands’. http://www.hrw.org/reports/2011/09/21/eu-s-dirty-hands-0.
Humphreys, Stephen. 2010. Human Rights and Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780511765520.
‘ICCPR’. n.d. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx.
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. 2000a. ‘Bámaca Velásquez v. Guatemala, Case No. 11/129 (Merits), Inter-Am. Ct. H.R., (Ser. C) No. 70’. University of Minnesota Human Rights Library. 2000. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/iachr/C/70-ing.html.
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. n.d. ‘The Responsibility to Protect’. http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICISS%20Report.pdf.
‘International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination’. 1965. 1965. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CERD.aspx.
‘———’. 1966. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CERD.aspx.
International Council on Human Rights Policy. 2011b. ‘Beyond Technology Transfer: Protecting Human Rights in a Climate-Constrained World’. http://www.ichrp.org/.
International Court of Justice. 28AD. ‘Advisory Opinion on Reservations to the Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide’. 28AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&k=90&case=12&code=ppcg&p3=4.
———. 2004b. ‘Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep. 136’. 2004. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&case=131&p3=4.
———. 2004c. ‘Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep. 136’. 2004. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&case=131&p3=4.
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. 2000b. ‘Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia’. 2000. http://www.icty.org/sid/10052.
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. 2003. ‘Prosecutor v. Galić, Trial Judgment, Case No. IT-98-29-T’. http://www.icty.org/x/cases/galic/acjug/en/gal-acjud061130.pdf.
———. n.d. ‘Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Appeal Judgement, Case No. IT-95-14-A’. http://www.icty.org/case/blaskic/4.
———. n.d. ‘Prosecutor v. Gotovina, Appeals Judgment, Case No. IT-06-90-A’. http://www.icty.org/x/cases/gotovina/acjug/en/121116_judgement.pdf.
‘International Law and Human Rights - PUBLG052’. n.d.
Isiksel, N. Türküler. n.d. ‘Fundamental Rights in the EU after Kadi and Al Barakaat’. European Law Journal 16 (5): 551–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00522.x.
Isiksel, Turkuler. n.d. ‘Global Legal Pluralism as Fact and Norm’. Global Constitutionalism 2 (2): 160–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381713000130.
Isiksel, Turkuler, and Anne Thies. n.d. ‘Changing Subjects: Rights, Remedies and Responsibilities of Individuals under Global Legal Pluralism’. Global Constitutionalism 2 (2): 151–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381713000117.
Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 25AD. ‘Responding to Hizbullah Attacks from Lebanon: Issues of Proportionality’. 25AD. http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/aboutisrael/state/law/pages/responding%20to%20hizbullah%20attacks%20from%20lebanon-%20issues%20of%20proportionality%20july%202006.aspx.
Johan Steyn. n.d. ‘Guantanamo Bay: The Legal Black Hole’. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 53 (1): 1–15. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3663134.
‘Katangese Peoples’ Congress v. Zaire, ACmHPR Comm. 75/92 (1995)’. n.d. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/africa/comcases/75-92.html.
Kennedy, David. 2004. The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7rsjc.
Kennedy, Duncan. 1997. A Critique of Adjudication: Fin de Siècle. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Kingsbury, Benedict. 2002. ‘Legal Positivism as Normative Politics: International Society, Balance of Power and Lassa Oppenheim’s Positive International Law’. European Journal of International Law 13 (2): 401–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/13.2.401.
‘Kitok v. Sweden, HRC Comm. No. 197/1985, UN Doc. A/43/40 (1988)’. n.d. http://www.worldcourts.com/hrc/eng/decisions/1988.07.27_Kitok_v_Sweden.htm.
Klare, Karl. 1991. ‘Legal Theory and Democratic Reconstruction’. University of British Columbia Law Review 25 (1): 69–103. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Index?index=journals%2Fubclr&collection=journals.
Klatt, Matthias, and Moritz Meister. 2012a. ‘Proportionality--a Benefit to Human Rights? Remarks on the I.CON Controversy’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 10 (3): 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mos019.
———. 2012b. The Constitutional Structure of Proportionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199662463.001.0001.
Kokott, Juliane, and Christoph Sobotta. 2012. ‘The Kadi Case - Constitutional Core Values and International Law - Finding the Balance?’ European Journal of International Law 23 (4): 1015–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chs063.
Kolb, Robert. n.d. ‘Selected Problems in the Theory of Customary International Law’. Netherlands International Law Review 50 (2): 119–50. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0165070X03001190.
———. n.d. ‘The Relationship between International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law: A Brief History of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the 1949 Geneva Conventions’. International Review of the Red Cross 38 (324): 409–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002086040009121X.
Koskenniemi, Martti. 1997. ‘Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch’. European Journal of International Law 8 (4): 566–82. http://ejil.oxfordjournals.org/content/8/4/566.abstract.
———. n.d. ‘Human Rights Mainstreaming as a Strategy for Institutional Power’. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 1 (1): 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1353/hum.2010.0003.
Kretzmer, David. n.d. ‘Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defence?’ European Journal of International Law 16 (2): 171–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chi114.
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195375671.001.0001.
Langford, Malcolm. 2008. Social Rights Jurisprudence: Emerging Trends in International and Comparative Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/social-rights-jurisprudence/E2DFA5FC0E55678CAF3BFF0B7D6B68AD.
‘Las Palmeras v. Colombia (Preliminary Objections, February 4, 2000), Inter-Am. Ct. H.R., (Ser. C) No. 67’. 2000. University of Minnesota Human Rights Library. 2000. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/iachr/C/67-ing.html.
Levinson, Sanford. 2004. Torture: A Collection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
MacAskill, Ewan, and James Ball. 21AD. ‘UN Surveillance Resolution Goes Ahead despite Attempts to Dilute Language’. The Guardian. 21AD. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/21/un-surveillance-resolution-us-uk-dilute-language.
Madhav Khosla. 2010. ‘Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights: A Reply’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 8 (2): 293–306. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=298&handle=hein.journals%2Finjcl8&collection=journals#302.
Manjoo, Rashida. 2011. ‘Violence Against Women in the United States and the State’s Obligation to Protect’. University of Virginia School of Law. http://www.reproductiverights.org/sites/crr.civicactions.net/files/documents/vaw.pdf.
Marco Roscini. n.d. ‘Targeting and Contemporary Aerial Bombardment’. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 54 (2): 411–43. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3663255.
McCorquodale, Robert, and Penelope Simons. n.d. ‘Responsibility beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law’. The Modern Law Review 70 (4): 598–625. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4543156.
McCrudden, Christopher. 2008. ‘Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights’. European Journal of International Law 19 (4): 655–724. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chn043.
Melzer, Nils. 2009. ‘Interpretive Guidance on the Notion of Direct Participation in Hostilities under International Humanitarian Law’. International Committee of the Red Cross. 2009. http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/publication/p0990.htm.
‘Memo from the President to National Security Advisors’. 7AD. National Security Archive. http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB127/02.02.07.pdf.
Meron, Theodor. 1989. Human Rights and Humanitarian Norms as Customary Law. Oxford: Clarendon. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198257455.001.0001.
———. 1997. ‘Convergence of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law’. In Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: The Quest for Universality. Vol. Nijhoff law specials. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.
Meyersfeld, Bonita. 2010. Domestic Violence and International Law. Oxford: Hart.
Milanovic, Marko. 5AD. ‘CRC Concluding Observations on the Holy See’. EJIL:Talk! 5AD. http://www.ejiltalk.org/crc-concluding-observations-on-the-holy-see/.
———. 25AD. ‘Foreign Surveillance and Human Rights: Introduction’. EJIL:Talk! 25AD. http://www.ejiltalk.org/foreign-surveillance-and-human-rights-introduction/.
‘M.M. v. Netherlands, ECtHR, App. No 39339/98’. 2003. European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-61002#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-61002%22]}.
Moeckli, Daniel, Sangeeta Shah, Sandesh Sivakumaran, and D. J. Harris. 2014a. International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2014b. International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2014c. International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2014d. International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2014e. International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2014f. International Human Rights Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
‘• Monim Elgak, Osman Hummeida and Amir Suliman (Represented by FIDH and OMCT) v Sudan, African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Communication 379/09 (10 March, 2015)’. n.d. http://www.achpr.org/files/sessions/15th-eo/comunications/379.09/achpr15eos_decision_379_09_eng.pdf.
Mullally, Siobhán. n.d. ‘Domestic Violence Asylum Claims and Recent Developments in International Human Rights Law: A Progress Narrative?’ International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60 (2): 459–84. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589311000042.
‘Nada v. Switzerland, ECtHR App No 10593/08 (12 September 2012)’. n.d. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113118#{"itemid":["001-113118"]}.
‘Necessary and Proportionate’. n.d. https://necessaryandproportionate.org/principles.
Nelson, Paul J. n.d. ‘Human Rights, the Millennium Development Goals, and the Future of Development Cooperation’. World Development 35 (12): 2041–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.006.
New Perspectives on the Public-Private Divide. 2003. Vol. Legal dimensions series. Vancouver: UBC Press.
‘Nicklinson & Lamb v. UK, ECtHR App. Nos. 1787/15 & 2478/15 (2015) ’. n.d.
Nollkaemper, André, and Dov Jacobs. n.d. ‘Shared Responsibility in International Law’. Michigan Journal of International Law 34 (2): 359–438. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/mjil34&i=371.
Noyes, John E., and Brian D. Smith. n.d. ‘State Responsibility and the Principle of Joint and Several Liability’. The Yale Journal of International Law 13 (2): 225–67. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/yjil13&i=231.
O’Connell, Mary Ellen, and Jus Cogens. 2012. ‘International Law’s Higher Ethical Norms’. In The Role of Ethics in International Law. Vol. ASIL studies in international legal theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511978425.
‘Office of the Assistant Attorney General, Memorandum for the Attorney General, July 16, 2010’. n.d. http://www.washingtonpost.com/r/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2014/06/23/National- Security/Graphics/memodrones.pdf.
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 15AD. ‘Report of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Relationship Between Climate Change and Human Rights, UN Doc. A/HRC/10/61’. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Press/AnalyticalStudy.pdf.
———. 1966a. ‘International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx.
———. 1966b. ‘International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx.
———. 1966c. ‘International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx.
———. 1966d. ‘International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx.
———. 1966e. ‘International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’. United Nations. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx.
———. 1966f. ‘International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’. United Nations. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx.
———. 1966g. ‘International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’. United Nations. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx.
———. 1966h. ‘International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights’. United Nations. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx.
‘OLC Memo for Alberto R. Gonzales’. 7AD. International Law of War Association. http://lawofwar.org/Bush_torture_memo.htm.
‘OLC Memo for Alberto R. Gonzales & William J. Haynes II’. 22AD. Office of Legal Counsel. http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/legacy/2009/08/24/memo-laws-taliban-detainees.pdf.
‘OLC Memo for Alberto R. Gonzales, Counsel to the President, Re: Standards of Conduct for Interrogation Under 18 USC §§ 2340-2340A, August 1, 2002’. n.d. http://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/olc/legacy/2010/08/05/memo-gonzales-aug2002.pdf.
Olivier Corten,Pierre Klein,. n.d. The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780199546640.001.0001/law-9780199546640.
‘Öllinger v. Austria, ECtHR App. No. 76900/01’. 29AD. European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-76098#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-76098%22]}.
Onora O’Neill. n.d. ‘The Dark Side of Human Rights’. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-) 81 (2): 427–39. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3568897.
‘Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, G.A. Res. 63/117 (2008)’. n.d. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/cescr/docs/A-RES-63-117.pdf.
‘Opuz v. Turkey, ECtHR, App. No. 33401/02’. 2009. European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-92945#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-92945%22]}.
Orakhelashvili, Alexander. 2008. ‘The Interaction between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Fragmentation, Conflict, Parallelism, or Convergence?’ European Journal of International Law 19 (1): 161–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chm055.
Organization of American States. 1948a. ‘American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man’. 1948. http://www.hrcr.org/docs/OAS_Declaration/oasrights.html.
Örücü, E. and United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law. 2003. Judicial Comparativism in Human Rights Cases. Vol. United Kingdom comparative law series. [London]: United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law.
‘Osman v. UK, ECtHR, App No. 87/1997/871/1083’. 1998. European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-58257#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-58257%22]}.
Perreau-Saussine, Amanda, and James B. Murphy, eds. 2007a. The Nature of Customary Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493744.
Perreau-Saussine, Amanda, and James Bernard Murphy. 2007b. The Nature of Customary Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Philip Alston. n.d. ‘Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate Seen through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals’. Human Rights Quarterly 27 (3): 755–829. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20069811.
Pogge, Thomas Winfried Menko. 2008. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity.
‘Protocol (I) Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts’. 1977. International Committee of the Red Cross. 1977. http://www.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/470.
‘Protocol No. 13 to European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’. 2002. Council of Europe. 2002. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=187&CL=ENG.
‘Protocol No. 15 Amending the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms’. 24AD. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/Html/213.htm.
‘R (Nicklinson & Another) v. Ministry of Justice, [2014] UKSC 38 (25 June)’. n.d. https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/uksc_2013_0235_judgment.pdf.
‘———’. n.d. https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/uksc_2013_0235_judgment.pdf.
Rainey, Bernadette, Elizabeth Wicks, Clare Ovey, Francis Geoffrey Jacobs, and Robin C. A. White. 2017. Jacobs, White & Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights. Seventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
‘Reference by the Governor in Council Concerning Certain Questions Relating to the Secession of Quebec from Canada ([1998] 2 Supreme Court Reporter (SCR) 217’. n.d. http://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/1643/index.do.
‘Report of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General on Kosovo’s Future Status, U.N. Doc. S/2007/168 (26 March, 2007)’. n.d. https://www.osce.org/kosovo/24787?download=true.
R.H. Helmholz. n.d. ‘Natural Human Rights: The Perspective of the IUS Commune’. Catholic University Law Review 52 (2). http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=301&handle=hein.journals%2Fcathu52&collection=journals#311.
R.J. Vincent. 1986. Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge: Published in association with the Royal Institute of International Affairs by Cambridge University Press.
Rosalyn Higgins. 1994. Problems and Process: International Law and How We Use It. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rosenberg, Gerald N. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change? 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Roth, Ken. n.d. ‘Defending Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Practical Issues Faced by an International Human Rights Organization’ 26 (1).
Roth, Kenneth. 2004. ‘Response to Leonard S. Rubenstein’. Human Rights Quarterly 26 (4): 873–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2004.0055.
Roth, Kenneth, Minky Worden, and Amy D. Bernstein. 2005. Torture: Does It Make Us Safer? Is It Ever OK? : A Human Rights Perspective. New York, N.Y.: New Press in conjunction with Human Rights Watch.
Rubenstein, Leonard S. 2004. ‘How International Human Rights Organizations Can Advance Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Response to Kenneth Roth’. Human Rights Quarterly 26 (4): 845–65. https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.2004.0056.
Ruggie, John Gerard. n.d. ‘Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda’. The American Journal of International Law 101 (4): 819–40. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40006320.
Ryngaert, Cedric. n.d. ‘The European Court of Human Rights’ Approach to the Responsibility of Member States in Connection with Acts of International Organizations’. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 60 (04): 997–1016. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589311000467.
Sachs, Jeffrey D., and John W. McArthur. 22AD. ‘The Millennium Project: A Plan for Meeting the Millennium Development Goals’. Lancet 365 (9456): 347–53. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=15780027&site=ehost-live.
Saith, Ashwani. n.d. ‘From Universal Values to Millennium Development Goals: Lost in Translation’. Development and Change 37 (6): 1167–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00518.x.
Samuels, Harriet. n.d. ‘Feminizing Human Rights Adjudication: Feminist Method and the Proportionality Principle’. Feminist Legal Studies 21 (1): 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-012-9225-6.
Sands, Philippe. 2008. Torture Team: Rumsfeld’s Memo and the Betrayal of American Values. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sands, Professor Philippe, Professor Andrew Clapham, and Blinne Ní Ghrálaigh. n.d. ‘Legal Opinion: The Lawfulness of the Authorisation by the United Kingdom of Weapons and Related Items for Export to Saudi Arabia in the Context of Saudi Arabia’s Military Intervention in Yemen (11 December, 2015)’. https://www.amnesty.org.uk/files/webfm/Documents/issues/final_legal_opinion_saudi_arabia_18_december_2015_-_final.pdf.
‘Saramaka People v. Suriname, IACtHR Ser. C No. 172 (28 November, 2007)’. n.d. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_172_ing.pdf.
‘SAS v. France, ECtHR, App. No. 43835/11’. 2014. European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-145466#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-145466%22]}.
Saul, Ben, David Kinley, and Jacqueline Mowbray. 2014. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Commentary, Cases, and Materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780199640300.001.0001/law-9780199640300.
Schutter, Olivier de. 2014. International Human Rights Law: Cases, Materials, Commentary. Second edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Sepúlveda, M. Magdalena. 2003. The Nature of the Obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Vol. School of Human Rights Research series. Antwerpen: Intersentia.
Shaw, Malcolm N. 2003. International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051903.
———. 2017. International Law. Eighth edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shelton, Dinah. 2008. Regional Protection of Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
———, ed. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law. Vol. Oxford handbooks in law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law/9780199640133.001.0001/law-9780199640133.
Shue, Henry. 1996. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and U.S. Foreign Policy. 2nd ed. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Smith, Rhona K. M. 2013. Texts and Materials on International Human Rights. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
‘Statement of Attorney General Eric Holder on Closure of Investigation into the Interrogation of Certain Detainees, Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs (August 30, 2012)’. n.d. http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/statement-attorney-general-eric-holder-closure-investigation-interrogation-certain-detainees.
Stavros Tsakyrakis. 2009. ‘Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights?’ International Journal of Constitutional Law 7 (3): 468–93. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=468&handle=hein.journals%2Finjcl7&collection=journals#474.
———. 2010. ‘Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights: A Rejoinder to Madhav Khosla’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 8 (2): 307–10. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=307&handle=hein.journals%2Finjcl8&collection=journals#311.
Stone Sweet, Alec. n.d. ‘A Cosmopolitan Legal Order: Constitutional Pluralism and Rights Adjudication in Europe’. Global Constitutionalism 1 (1): 53–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381711000062.
Supreme Court. 19AD. Smith (No. 2) v. Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41.
Supreme Court of Israel. 2006. ‘Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. Israel, Supreme Court of Israel, HCJ 769/02’. Hague Justice Portal. http://www.haguejusticeportal.net/Docs/NLP/Israel/Targetted_Killings_Supreme_Court_13-12-2006.pdf.
Sweet, Alec Stone, and Jud Matthews. 2008. ‘Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism’. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 47. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?page=72&handle=hein.journals%2Fcjtl47&collection=journals#74.
‘Symposium: International Human Rights and Climate Change’. 2010. Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law 38 (3): 511–797. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/gjicl38&i=521.
Tara Melish. 2002. ‘Protecting Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the Inter-American Human Rights System’. Centro de Derechos Económicos y Sociales. https://law.yale.edu/system/files/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/MANUAL_OAS_INGLES.pdf.
‘TBB v. Germany, Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Communication No. 48/2010, CERD/C/82/D/48/2010’. 4AD. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. http://www2.ohchr.org/English/bodies/cerd/docs/CERD-C-82-D-48-2010-English.pdf.
‘The Human Rights Situation of Indigenous People in the Americas, IACmHR, OEA/Ser.L/V/II/108, Doc. 62 (2000)’. n.d. http://www.cidh.org/Indigenas/TOC.htm.
‘The Independent International Commission on Kosovo, The Kosovo Report (2000)’. n.d. http://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/6D26FF88119644CFC1256989005CD392-thekosovoreport.pdf.
‘The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age, Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, A/HRC/27/37 (June 30, 2014)’. n.d. https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCEQFjAAahUKEwias4aYjf_HAhXFfhoKHXC5BFM&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ohchr.org%2FEN%2FHRBodies%2FHRC%2FRegularSessions%2FSession27%2FDocuments%2FA-HRC-27-37_en.doc&usg=AFQjCNEV939mQ6D32744AZQmPV2V0ucLuA&sig2=s-h3KVwWowHyQFrfcxGadA.
The White House. n.d. ‘U.S. Policy Standards and Procedures for the Use of Force in Counterterrorism Operations Outside the United States and Areas of Active Hostilities’. The White House. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/fact-sheet-us-policy-standards-and-procedures-use-force-counterterrorism.
Theodor Meron. n.d. ‘The Humanization of Humanitarian Law’. The American Journal of International Law 94 (2): 239–78. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2555292.
Thomas Nagel. n.d. ‘The Problem of Global Justice’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 33 (2): 113–47. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3558011.
Travis, Phyllida, and et al. n.d. ‘Overcoming Health-Systems Constraints to Achieve the Millennium Development Goals’. The Lancet 364 (9437): 900–906. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16987-0.
Tushnet, Mark V. 2008. Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7s5kr.
U.N. General Assembly. 20AD. ‘General Assembly Third Committee, The Right to Privacy in a Digital Age, UN Doc. A/C.3/68/L.45’. United Nations. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/LTD/N13/576/77/PDF/N1357677.pdf?OpenElement.
‘UNGA “Report of the Committee for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women” (1998)’. n.d. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/reports/18report.pdf.
United Nations. 1945. ‘UN Charter’. United Nations. https://treaties.un.org/doc/publication/ctc/uncharter.pdf.
———. 1948. ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’. 1948. http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/.
———. 1948b. ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’. United Nations. 1948. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/.
———. 1979. ‘Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)’. UN Women. 1979. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/.
———. 1984. ‘Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment’. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. 1984. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CAT.aspx.
———. 2001. ‘Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts’. International Law Commission. http://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/draft%20articles/9_6_2001.pdf.
———. 2009. ‘Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 20, Non-Discrimination in Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (Art. 2, Para. 2) U.N. Doc. E/C.12/GC/20’. University of Minnesota Human Rights Library. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/escgencom20.html.
———. 2011. International Legal Protection of Human Rights in Armed Conflict. New York: United Nations.
U.S. Department of State. n.d. ‘Fourth Periodic Report of the United States of America to the United Nations Committee on Human Rights Concerning the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights’. U.S. Department of State. http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/179781.htm.
Uvin, Peter. 2004. Human Rights and Development. Bloomfield, Conn: Kumarian Press.
Venice Commission. 17AD. ‘Opinion on the International Legal Obligations of Council of Europe Member States in Respect of Secret Detention Facilities and Inter-State Transport of Prisoners, Opinion No. 363/2005, Doc. CDL-AD(2006)009’. http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-AD(2006)009-e.
Vincent, R. J. 1987. Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511598814.
Virgílio Afonso da Silva. n.d. ‘Comparing the Incommensurable: Constitutional Principles, Balancing and Rational Decision’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 31 (2): 273–301. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=61047869&site=ehost-live.
Vizard, Polly. 2006. Poverty and Human Rights: Sen’s ‘capability Perspective’ Explored. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199273874.001.0001.
Watkin, Kenneth. n.d. ‘Controlling the Use of Force: A Role for Human Rights Norms in Contemporary Armed Conflict’. The American Journal of International Law 98 (1): 1–34. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/3139252?origin=crossref.
Wet, Erika de, and Jure Vidmar. n.d. ‘Conflicts between International Paradigms: Hierarchy versus Systemic Integration’. Global Constitutionalism 2 (2): 196–217. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381713000129.
White, Lucie, and Jeremy Perelman. 2011. Stones of Hope: How African Activists Reclaim Human Rights to Challenge Global Poverty. Vol. Stanford studies in human rights. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press.
White, Robin C. A., Clare Ovey, Francis Geoffrey Jacobs, and Clare Ovey. 2010. The European Convention on Human Rights. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
‘X & Y v. Netherlands, ECtHR, App No. 8978/80’. 1985. European Court of Human Rights. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-57603#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-57603%22]}.
‘Xákmok Kásek Indigenous Community v. Paraguay, IACtHR Ser. C No. 214 (24 August 2010)’. n.d. http://www.corteidh.or.cr/docs/casos/articulos/seriec_214_ing.pdf.
Yamin, Alicia Ely, and Siri Gloppen. 2011. Litigating Health Rights: Can Courts Bring More Justice to Health? Vol. Human Rights Program series. [Cambridge, MA]: Harvard University Press.
Yamin, Alicia Ely, and Oscar Parra-Vera. n.d. ‘Judicial Protection of the Right to Health in Colombia: From Social Demands to Individual Claims to Public Debates’. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review 33 (2): 431–59. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?lname=&public=false&collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/hasint33&men_hide=false&men_tab=toc&kind=&page=431.
Young, Katharine G. 2012. Constituting Economic and Social Rights. Vol. Oxford constitutional theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199641932.001.0001.
Young, Katharine G., and Julieta Lemaitre. 2013. ‘The Comparative Fortunes of the Right to Health: Two Tales of Justiciability in Colombia and South Africa’. Harvard Human Rights Journal 26 (1): 179–216. http://harvardhrj.com/archive/.
Ziegler, Katja S. 2009. ‘Strengthening the Rule of Law, but Fragmenting International Law: The Kadi Decision of the ECJ from the Perspective of Human Rights’. Human Rights Law Review 9 (2): 288–305. https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngp010.