1
International Law and Human Rights - PUBLG052.
2
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, et al. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.
3
Alston P, Goodman R. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
4
Harris DJ, Sivakumaran S. Cases and materials on international law. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell 2015.
5
Ghandhi PR. Blackstone’s international human rights documents. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010.
6
Smith RKM. Texts and materials on international human rights. 3rd ed. London: Routledge 2013.
7
Başak Cali. International law for international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010.
8
Armstrong JD, Farrell T, Lambert H. International law and international relations. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012.
9
Armstrong JD, Farrell T, Lambert H. International law and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007.
10
R.J. Vincent. Human rights and international relations. Cambridge: Published in association with the Royal Institute of International Affairs by Cambridge University Press 1986.
11
Vincent RJ. Human Rights and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1987.
12
Forsythe DP. Human rights in international relations. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012.
13
Beth A. Simmons, Richard H. Steinberg. International law and international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006.
14
Rosalyn Higgins. Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1994.
15
Higgins R. Problems and process: international law and how we use it. Oxford: Clarendon 2000.
16
White RCA, Ovey C, Jacobs FG, et al. The European Convention on Human Rights. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010.
17
Shaw MN. International law. Eighth edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2017.
18
Shaw MN. International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2003.
19
Antonio Cassese. International law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2005.
20
Alan E. Boyle, C.M. Chinkin. The making of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2007.
21
Alan Boyle,Christine Chinkin,. The Making of International Law.
22
Hilary Charlesworth, C.M. Chinkin. The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press, Juris 2000.
23
Brownlie’s Principles of Public International Law (8th ed., 2012), James Crawford.
24
Evans MD, editor. International law. Fifth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press 2018.
25
Saul B, Kinley D, Mowbray J. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: commentary, cases, and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.
26
Shelton D, editor. The Oxford handbook of international human rights law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2013.
27
Dinah Shelton, The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law 2013. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do;jsessionid=BBDE8C447BB987EEC948830E0037FE55?cs=frb&ct=frb&frbg=707356124&fctN=facet_frbrgroupid&fctV=707356124&doc=UCL_LMS_DS002234891&lastPag=&lastPagIndx=1&rfnGrp=frbr&frbrSrt=rank&frbrRecordsSource=Primo+Local&frbrJtitleDisplay=&frbrIssnDisplay=&frbrEissnDisplay=&frbrSourceidDisplay=UCL_LMS_DS&query=any%2Ccontains%2CDinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&indx=1&fn=search&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A(UCL)%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=false&ct=search&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=Dinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&dstmp=1508443362273&fromDL
28
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, et al. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.
29
Fassbender B, Peters A, Peter S, et al. The Oxford handbook of the history of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
30
Rainey B, Wicks E, Ovey C, et al. Jacobs, White & Ovey: the European Convention on Human Rights. Seventh edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2017.
31
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, et al. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.
32
Alston P, Goodman R. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
33
Crawford JR. The Identification of Customary International Law. 23 AD.
34
United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/
35
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
36
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx
37
International Court of Justice. Advisory Opinion on Reservations to the Convention on Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. 28 AD. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&k=90&case=12&code=ppcg&p3=4
38
Aust A. Modern treaty law and practice. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2013.
39
Ed Bates. Avoiding Legal Obligations Created by Human Rights Treaties. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. ;57:751–88.
40
Besson S. Theorizing the Sources of International Law. The philosophy of international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2010.
41
Bianchi A. Human Rights and the Magic of Jus Cogens. European Journal of International Law. 2008;19:491–508. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chn026
42
Cannizzaro E, Arsanjani MH. The law of treaties beyond the Vienna Convention. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011.
43
Corten O, Klein P. The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: a commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2011.
44
Olivier Corten,Pierre Klein,. The Vienna Conventions on the Law of Treaties: A Commentary.
45
Kingsbury B. Legal Positivism as Normative Politics: International Society, Balance of Power and Lassa Oppenheim’s Positive International Law. European Journal of International Law. 2002;13:401–37. doi: 10.1093/ejil/13.2.401
46
Koskenniemi M. Hierarchy in International Law: A Sketch. European Journal of International Law. 1997;8:566–82.
47
Kolb R. Selected Problems in the Theory of Customary International Law. Netherlands International Law Review. ;50:119–50. doi: 10.1017/S0165070X03001190
48
Meron T. Human rights and humanitarian norms as customary law. Oxford: Clarendon 1989.
49
O’Connell ME, Cogens J. International Law’s Higher Ethical Norms. The role of ethics in international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012.
50
Perreau-Saussine A, Murphy JB. The nature of customary law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007.
51
Perreau-Saussine A, Murphy JB, editors. The Nature of Customary Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2007.
52
Akehurst M. The Hierarchy of the Sources of International Law. The British year book of international law. 1975;47:281–5.
53
Alston P, Goodman R. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
54
R (Nicklinson & Another) v. Ministry of Justice, [2014] UKSC 38 (25 June).
55
Nicklinson & Lamb v. UK, ECtHR App. Nos. 1787/15 & 2478/15 (2015) .
56
Schutter O de. International human rights law: cases, materials, commentary. Second edition. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press 2014.
57
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
58
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx
59
European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 1950. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer
60
Bassiouni MC, Schabas W, editors. New challenges for the UN human rights machinery: what future for the UN treaty body system and the Human Rights Council procedures? Cambridge: Intersentia 2011.
61
Carozza PG. ‘My Friend Is a Stranger’: The Death Penalty and the Global Ius Commune of Human Rights. Texas Law Review. ;81:1031–89.
62
Carozza PG. Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights: A Reply. European Journal of International Law. 2008;19:931–44. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chn059
63
Egan S. The United Nations human rights treaty system: law and procedure. Haywards Heath: Bloomsbury Professional 2011.
64
Guzman AT, Meyer TL. International Common Law: The Soft law of International Tribunals. Chicago journal of international law. ;9:515–36.
65
R.H. Helmholz. Natural Human Rights: The Perspective of the IUS Commune. Catholic University Law Review. ;52.
66
Isiksel T. Global legal pluralism as fact and norm. Global Constitutionalism. ;2:160–95. doi: 10.1017/S2045381713000130
67
Isiksel T, Thies A. Changing subjects: Rights, remedies and responsibilities of individuals under global legal pluralism. Global Constitutionalism. ;2:151–9. doi: 10.1017/S2045381713000117
68
McCrudden C. Human Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law. 2008;19:655–724. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chn043
69
Örücü E, United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law. Judicial comparativism in human rights cases. [London]: United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law 2003.
70
Shelton D. Regional protection of human rights. New York: Oxford University Press 2008.
71
Stone Sweet A. A cosmopolitan legal order: Constitutional pluralism and rights adjudication in Europe. Global Constitutionalism. ;1:53–90. doi: 10.1017/S2045381711000062
72
van Elsuwege P. New challenges for pluralist adjudication after Lisbon: the protection of fundamental rights in a Ius commune Europaeum. Netherlands quarterly of human rights. 2012;30:195–217.
73
United Nations. Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). 1979. http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/
74
European Convention on Human Rights & Fundamental Freedoms. 1950. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/005.htm
75
United Nations. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. 1984. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CAT.aspx
76
Alston P, Goodman R. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
77
Chinkin C. A critique of the public/private dimension. European Journal of International Law. 1999;10:387–95. doi: 10.1093/ejil/10.2.387
78
X & Y v. Netherlands, ECtHR, App No. 8978/80. 1985.
79
Osman v. UK, ECtHR, App No. 87/1997/871/1083. 1998.
80
Committee Against Torture, General Comment No. 2, Implementation of article 2 by States Parties. 2007. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cat/general_comments/cat-gencom2.html
81
Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 31, Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13. 2004. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/hrcom31.html
82
M.M. v. Netherlands, ECtHR, App. No 39339/98. 2003.
83
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. 1965. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CERD.aspx
84
Human Rights Committee,. General Comment No. 24: Issues relating to reservations made upon ratification or accession to the Covenant or the Optional Protocols thereto, or in relation to declarations under article 41 of the Covenant, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.6. 1994. https://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/hrcom24.htm
85
UNGA ‘Report of the Committee for the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women’ (1998).
86
Belilos v. Switzerland, ECtHR App. No 10328/83 (1988). http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#{"appno":["10328/83"],"itemid":["001-57434"]}
87
Askin KD, Koenig DM. Women and international human rights law. 3rd ed. Ardsley, N. Y.: Transnational 1999.
88
Charlesworth H, Chinkin C, Wright S. Feminist Approaches to International Law. The American Journal of International Law. ;85:613–45.
89
Charlesworth H, Chinkin CM. The boundaries of international law: a feminist analysis. Manchester: Manchester University Press 2000.
90
Andrew Clapham,. Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors.
91
Clapham A, Academy of European Law. Human rights obligations of non-state actors. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006.
92
Krook ML. Quotas for women in politics: gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2009.
93
New perspectives on the public-private divide. Vancouver: UBC Press 2003.
94
Manjoo R. Violence Against Women in the United States and the State’s Obligation to Protect. 2011.
95
Meyersfeld B. Domestic violence and international law. Oxford: Hart 2010.
96
Mullally S. Domestic Violence Asylum Claims and Recent Developments in International Human Rights Law: A Progress Narrative? International and Comparative Law Quarterly. ;60:459–84. doi: 10.1017/S0020589311000042
97
Opuz v. Turkey, ECtHR, App. No. 33401/02. 2009.
98
Shue H. Basic rights: subsistence, affluence, and U.S. foreign policy. 2nd ed. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 1996.
99
Alston P, Goodman R. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
100
United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. 1948. http://www.un.org/en/universal-declaration-human-rights/
101
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx
102
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
103
European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 1950. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer
104
International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CERD.aspx
105
Öllinger v. Austria, ECtHR App. No. 76900/01. 29 AD.
106
TBB v. Germany, Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Communication No. 48/2010, CERD/C/82/D/48/2010. 4 AD.
107
Goekce v. Austria, Annex, U.N. Doc. CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005. 6 AD.
108
Alston P, Goodman R. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
109
Eweida & others v. UK, ECtHR, App. Nos. 48420/10, 59842/10, 51671/10 and 36516/10. 2013.
110
Human Rights Committee. General Comment 34, U.N. Doc CCPR/C/GC/34. 2011. http://www.refworld.org/docid/4ed34b562.html
111
Koskenniemi M. Human Rights Mainstreaming as a Strategy for Institutional Power. Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development. ;1:47–58. doi: 10.1353/hum.2010.0003
112
Sweet AS, Matthews J. Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law. 2008;47.
113
SAS v. France, ECtHR, App. No. 43835/11. 2014.
114
• Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly, Committee on Legal Affairs and Human Rights. The Future of the European Court of Human Rights and the Brighton Declaration, AS/Jur. 3 AD.
115
Protocol No. 15 Amending the Convention on the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 24 AD.
116
R (Nicklinson & Another) v. Ministry of Justice, [2014] UKSC 38 (25 June).
117
Arosemena G. Conflicts of rights in international human rights: A meta-rule analysis. Global Constitutionalism. ;2:6–36. doi: 10.1017/S2045381712000214
118
Foster L, Jacobs LA, Azmi S. Balancing competing human rights claims in a diverse society: institutions, policy, principles. Toronto: Irwin Law 2012.
119
Benvenisti E. Margin of Appreciation, Consensus and Universal Standards. New York University journal of international law & politics. ;31:843–54.
120
Brady ADP. Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012.
121
Brady ADP. Proportionality and deference under the UK Human Rights Act: an institutionally sensitive approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press 2012.
122
Brems E, International Conference on Conflicts Between Fundamental Rights. Conflicts between fundamental rights. Antwerp: Intersentia 2008.
123
Başak Cali. Balancing Human Rights? Methodological Problems with Weights, Scales and Proportions. Human Rights Quarterly. ;29:251–70.
124
Virgílio Afonso da Silva. Comparing the Incommensurable: Constitutional Principles, Balancing and Rational Decision. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. ;31:273–301.
125
Handyside v. UK, ECtHR, App. No. 5493/72. 1976.
126
Kennedy D. The dark sides of virtue: reassessing international humanitarianism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2004.
127
Kennedy D. A critique of adjudication: fin de siècle. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press 1997.
128
Klare K. Legal Theory and Democratic Reconstruction. University of British Columbia law review. 1991;25:69–103.
129
Klatt M, Meister M. The constitutional structure of proportionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
130
Onora O’Neill. The Dark Side of Human Rights. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-). ;81:427–39.
131
Samuels H. Feminizing Human Rights Adjudication: Feminist Method and the Proportionality Principle. Feminist Legal Studies. ;21:39–60. doi: 10.1007/s10691-012-9225-6
132
Cass R. Sunstein. Rights and Their Critics. Notre Dame Law Review. 1995;70:727–68.
133
Stavros Tsakyrakis. Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights? International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2009;7:468–93.
134
Madhav Khosla. Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights: A Reply. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2010;8:293–306.
135
Stavros Tsakyrakis. Proportionality: An Assault on Human Rights: A Rejoinder to Madhav Khosla. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2010;8:307–10.
136
Klatt M, Meister M. Proportionality--a benefit to human rights? Remarks on the I.CON controversy. International Journal of Constitutional Law. 2012;10:687–708. doi: 10.1093/icon/mos019
137
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/ccpr.aspx
138
European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 1950. http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=basictexts&c=#n1359128122487_pointer
139
Organization of American States. American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man. 1948. http://www.hrcr.org/docs/OAS_Declaration/oasrights.html
140
Geneva Convention (III) relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. 1949. http://www.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/375?OpenDocument
141
Protocol (I) Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts. 1977. http://www.icrc.org/ihl/INTRO/470
142
Geneva Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War. 1949. http://www.icrc.org/ihl/385ec082b509e76c41256739003e636d/6756482d86146898c125641e004aa3c5
143
Alston P, Goodman R. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
144
OLC Memo for Alberto R. Gonzales & William J. Haynes II. 22 AD.
145
OLC Memo for Alberto R. Gonzales. 7 AD.
146
Memo from the President to national security advisors. 7 AD.
147
Al-Jedda v. UK, ECtHR, [GC] App. no. 27021/08 (2011).
148
Hassan v. UK, ECtHR [GC], no. 29750/09 (2014). 2014.
149
Alston P, Goodman R. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
150
Statement of Attorney General Eric Holder on Closure of Investigation into the Interrogation of Certain Detainees, Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs (August 30, 2012).
151
OLC Memo for Alberto R. Gonzales, Counsel to the President, Re: Standards of Conduct for Interrogation Under 18 USC §§ 2340-2340A, August 1, 2002.
152
CIA Office of General Counsel, Draft: Legal Appendix: Paragraph 5-Hostile Interrogations: Legal Considerations for CIA Officers, November 26, 2002.
153
Abella v. Argentina, Case 11.137, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Report No. 55/97. 1997. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/cases/1997/argentina55-97a.html
154
Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (DRC v. Uganda), ICJ Rep. 168. 2005. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=3&code=co&case=116&k=51/
155
Abresch W. A Human Rights Law of Internal Armed Conflict: The European Court of Human Rights in Chechnya. European Journal of International Law. ;16:741–67. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chi139
156
Arnold R, Quénivet NNR. International humanitarian law and human rights law: towards a new merger in international law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff 2008.
157
Inter-American Court of Human Rights. Bámaca Velásquez v. Guatemala, Case No. 11/129 (Merits), Inter-Am. Ct. H.R., (Ser. C) No. 70. 2000. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/iachr/C/70-ing.html
158
Bullard A. Human rights in crisis. Aldershot: Ashgate 2008.
159
Coard v. the United States of America, Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, Case 10.951. 1999. https://www.cidh.oas.org/annualrep/99eng/Merits/UnitedStates10.951.htm
160
Doswald-Beck L, Vité S. International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law. International Review of the Red Cross. ;33:94–119. doi: 10.1017/S0020860400071539
161
Cordula Droege. The Interplay between International Humanitarian Law and International Human Rights Law in Situations of Armed Conflict. Israel Law Review. ;40:310–55. doi: 10.1017/S0021223700013376
162
Goldsmith JL. Power and constraint: the accountable presidency after 9/11. New York: W. W. Norton & Co 2012.
163
Greenberg KJ. The least worst place: Guantanamo’s first 100 days. New York: Oxford University Press 2009.
164
Hampson F. The Relationship between International Human Rights Law and International Humanitarian Law, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2005/14. 2005. http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/subcom/57/aevdoc.htm
165
Heintze H-J. On the relationship between human rights law protection and international humanitarian law. Revue Internationale de la Croix-Rouge/International Review of the Red Cross. ;86:789–814. doi: 10.1017/S1560775500180460
166
Kolb R. The relationship between international humanitarian law and human rights law: A brief history of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the 1949 Geneva Conventions. International Review of the Red Cross. ;38:409–19. doi: 10.1017/S002086040009121X
167
Las Palmeras v. Colombia (Preliminary Objections, February 4, 2000), Inter-Am. Ct. H.R., (Ser. C) No. 67. 2000. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/iachr/C/67-ing.html
168
International Court of Justice. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep. 136. 2004. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&case=131&p3=4
169
Levinson S. Torture: a collection. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2004.
170
Meron T. Convergence of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Law. Human rights and humanitarian law: the quest for universality. The Hague: M. Nijhoff 1997.
171
Theodor Meron. The Humanization of Humanitarian Law. The American Journal of International Law. ;94:239–78.
172
Orakhelashvili A. The Interaction between Human Rights and Humanitarian Law: Fragmentation, Conflict, Parallelism, or Convergence? European Journal of International Law. 2008;19:161–82. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chm055
173
Roth K, Worden M, Bernstein AD. Torture: does it make us safer? Is it ever OK? : a human rights perspective. New York, N.Y.: New Press in conjunction with Human Rights Watch 2005.
174
Sands P. Torture team: Rumsfeld’s memo and the betrayal of American values. New York: Palgrave Macmillan 2008.
175
Johan Steyn. Guantanamo Bay: The Legal Black Hole. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. ;53:1–15.
176
United Nations. International legal protection of human rights in armed conflict. New York: United Nations 2011.
177
Alston P, Goodman R. McCann and others v.United Kingdom: European Court of Human Rights, Application No.18984/91 (Grand Chamber), 27 Sept.1995. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
178
Dinstein Y. Lawful targets of attack. The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016:102–38.
179
Dinstein Y. Prohibited weapons. The Conduct of Hostilities under the Law of International Armed Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2016:72–101.
180
Supreme Court of Israel. Public Committee Against Torture in Israel v. Israel, Supreme Court of Israel, HCJ 769/02. 2006.
181
Office of the Assistant Attorney General, Memorandum for the Attorney General, July 16, 2010. http://www.washingtonpost.com/r/2010-2019/WashingtonPost/2014/06/23/National- Security/Graphics/memodrones.pdf
182
The White House. U.S. Policy Standards and Procedures for the Use of Force in Counterterrorism Operations Outside the United States and Areas of Active Hostilities. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/23/fact-sheet-us-policy-standards-and-procedures-use-force-counterterrorism
183
House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights, The Government’s policy on the use of drones for targeted killing, Second Report of Session 2015–16, HL Paper 141 HC 574 (10 May 2016).
184
Alston P, Goodman R. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
185
Human Rights Committee. HRC, General Comment No. 31: Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. 2004. http://www1.umn.edu/humanrts/gencomm/hrcom31.html
186
International Court of Justice. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Rep. 136. 2004. http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/index.php?p1=3&p2=4&case=131&p3=4
187
U.S. Department of State. Fourth Periodic Report of the United States of America to the United Nations Committee on Human Rights Concerning the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. http://www.state.gov/j/drl/rls/179781.htm
188
Supreme Court. Smith (No. 2) v. Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41. 19 AD.
189
U.N. General Assembly. General Assembly Third Committee, The Right to Privacy in a Digital Age, UN Doc. A/C.3/68/L.45. 20 AD.
190
MacAskill E, Ball J. UN surveillance resolution goes ahead despite attempts to dilute language. The Guardian. 21 AD. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/21/un-surveillance-resolution-us-uk-dilute-language
191
Milanovic M. Foreign Surveillance and Human Rights: Introduction. 25 AD. http://www.ejiltalk.org/foreign-surveillance-and-human-rights-introduction/
192
Milanovic M. CRC Concluding Observations on the Holy See. 5 AD. http://www.ejiltalk.org/crc-concluding-observations-on-the-holy-see/
193
The Right to Privacy in the Digital Age, Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, A/HRC/27/37 (June 30, 2014).
194
Necessary and Proportionate.
195
Alston P. Study on Targeted Killings – Addendum to the Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions.
196
Alston P, Hunt P, Kälin W, et al. Report of UN Special Rapporteurs on Mission To Lebanon And Israel, UN Doc A/HRC/2/7. http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/G06/141/95/PDF/G0614195.pdf?OpenElement
197
Bothe M. The Protection of the Civilian Population and NATO Bombing on Yugoslavia: Comments on a Report to the Prosecutor of the ICTY. European Journal of International Law. 2001;12:531–6. doi: 10.1093/ejil/12.3.531
198
International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. Final Report to the Prosecutor by the Committee Established to Review the NATO Bombing Campaign Against the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. 2000. http://www.icty.org/sid/10052
199
Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Responding to Hizbullah attacks from Lebanon: Issues of proportionality. 25 AD. http://www.mfa.gov.il/mfa/aboutisrael/state/law/pages/responding%20to%20hizbullah%20attacks%20from%20lebanon-%20issues%20of%20proportionality%20july%202006.aspx
200
Kretzmer D. Targeted Killing of Suspected Terrorists: Extra-Judicial Executions or Legitimate Means of Defence? European Journal of International Law. ;16:171–212. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chi114
201
McCorquodale R, Simons P. Responsibility beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law. The Modern Law Review. ;70:598–625.
202
Melzer N. Interpretive guidance on the notion of direct participation in hostilities under international humanitarian law. 2009. http://www.icrc.org/eng/resources/documents/publication/p0990.htm
203
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Prosecutor v. Blaškić, Appeal Judgement, Case No. IT-95-14-A.
204
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Prosecutor v. Gotovina, Appeals Judgment, Case No. IT-06-90-A.
205
International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia. Prosecutor v. Galić, Trial Judgment, Case No. IT-98-29-T. 2003.
206
Marco Roscini. Targeting and Contemporary Aerial Bombardment. The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. ;54:411–43.
207
Ruggie JG. Business and Human Rights: The Evolving International Agenda. The American Journal of International Law. ;101:819–40.
208
Watkin K. Controlling the Use of Force: A Role for Human Rights Norms in Contemporary Armed Conflict. The American Journal of International Law. ;98:1–34.
209
Business & Human Rights Resource Centre. Extraterritorial jurisdiction. http://business-humanrights.org/en/special-representative/un-secretary-generals-special-representative-on-business-human-rights/materials-by-topic/extraterritorial-jurisdiction
210
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. 1966. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/cescr.aspx
211
Alston P, Goodman R. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
212
Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, G.A. res. 63/117 (2008).
213
African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Banjul Charter / ACHPR) (1981).
214
American Convention on Human Rights (Pact of San Jose / ACHR) (1969).
215
Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights in the Area of Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (Protocol of San Salvador) (1988).
216
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Principles and Guidelines on the Implementation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (November 2010).
217
• Monim Elgak, Osman Hummeida and Amir Suliman (represented by FIDH and OMCT) v Sudan, African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Communication 379/09 (10 March, 2015).
218
Acevedo Buendía v. Perú, IACtHR (1 July, 2009).
219
Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 15 (2002).
220
Roth K. Defending Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: Practical Issues Faced by an International Human Rights Organization. ;26.
221
Roth K. Response to Leonard S. Rubenstein. Human Rights Quarterly. 2004;26:873–8. doi: 10.1353/hrq.2004.0055
222
Rubenstein LS. How International Human Rights Organizations Can Advance Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: A Response to Kenneth Roth. Human Rights Quarterly. 2004;26:845–65. doi: 10.1353/hrq.2004.0056
223
de Albuquerque C. Chronicle of an Announced Birth: The Coming into Life of the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights—The Missing Piece of the International Bill of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. ;32:144–78. doi: 10.1353/hrq.0.0137
224
Philip Alston. Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate Seen through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals. Human Rights Quarterly. ;27:755–829.
225
Alston P. A Human Rights Perspective on the Millennium Development Goals.
226
De Schutter O, et al. Commentary to the Maastricht Principles on Extraterritorial Obligations of States in the Area of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Human Rights Quarterly. ;34:1084–169. doi: 10.1353/hrq.2012.0063
227
Easterly W. How the Millennium Development Goals are Unfair to Africa. World Development. ;37:26–35. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.02.009
228
Gauri V, Brinks DM. Courting social justice: judicial enforcement of social and economic rights in the developing world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008.
229
Langford M. Social rights jurisprudence: emerging trends in international and comparative law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2008.
230
Nelson PJ. Human Rights, the Millennium Development Goals, and the Future of Development Cooperation. World Development. ;35:2041–55. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.02.006
231
Rosenberg GN. The hollow hope: can courts bring about social change? 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago 2008.
232
Sachs JD, McArthur JW. The Millennium Project: a plan for meeting the Millennium Development Goals. Lancet. 22 AD;365:347–53.
233
Saith A. From Universal Values to Millennium Development Goals: Lost in Translation. Development and Change. ;37:1167–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2006.00518.x
234
Travis P, et al. Overcoming health-systems constraints to achieve the Millennium Development Goals. The Lancet. ;364:900–6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16987-0
235
Tushnet MV. Weak courts, strong rights: judicial review and social welfare rights in comparative constitutional law. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press 2008.
236
White L, Perelman J. Stones of hope: how African activists reclaim human rights to challenge global poverty. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press 2011.
237
Yamin AE, Gloppen S. Litigating health rights: can courts bring more justice to health? [Cambridge, MA]: Harvard University Press 2011.
238
Young KG. Constituting economic and social rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
239
Craven MCR. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights: a perspective on its development. [Paperback ed.]. Oxford: Clarendon Press 2002.
240
Sepúlveda MM. The nature of the obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Antwerpen: Intersentia 2003.
241
Tara Melish. Protecting economic, social and cultural rights in the Inter-American human rights system. 2002.
242
United Nations. Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 20, Non-Discrimination in Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (art. 2, para. 2) U.N. Doc. E/C.12/GC/20. 2009.
243
Young KG, Lemaitre J. The Comparative Fortunes of the Right to Health: Two Tales of Justiciability in Colombia and South Africa. Harvard Human Rights Journal. 2013;26:179–216.
244
Yamin AE, Parra-Vera O. Judicial protection of the right to health in Colombia: From social demands to individual claims to public debates. Hastings International and Comparative Law Review. ;33:431–59.
245
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, et al. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.
246
Alston P, Goodman R, Steiner HJ. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
249
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948).
250
Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, GA Res 61/295 (2007.
251
Kitok v. Sweden, HRC Comm. No. 197/1985, UN Doc. A/43/40 (1988).
252
Human Rights Committee, General Comment 23, UN Doc CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.5 (1994).
253
Human Rights Committee, General Comment 12 (1984), in , U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/Rev.1 at 12.
254
Advisory Opinion of the African Commission on Human and Peoples ’ Rights on the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (2007).
255
Apirana Mahuika v. New Zealand, Human Rights Committee, Comm. No. 547/1993, UN Doc. CCPR/C/70/D/547/1993 (2000).
256
The Human Rights Situation of Indigenous People in the Americas, IACmHR, OEA/Ser.L/V/II/108, Doc. 62 (2000).
257
Xákmok Kásek Indigenous Community v. Paraguay, IACtHR Ser. C No. 214 (24 August 2010).
258
Saramaka People v. Suriname, IACtHR Ser. C No. 172 (28 November, 2007).
259
Centre for Minority Rights Development (Kenya) and Minority Rights Group International on behalf of Endorois Welfare Council v. Kenya, Afr Comm’n HPR Case 276/03 (2010).
260
African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Principles and Guidelines on the Implementation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (November 2010).
261
Addis, Adeno. Individualism, Communitarianism, And The Rights Of Ethnic Minorities. The Notre Dame Law Review. ;67:615–76.
262
Alston P, Goodman R. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
263
Katangese Peoples’ Congress v. Zaire, ACmHPR Comm. 75/92 (1995).
264
Reference by the Governor in Council concerning Certain Questions relating to the Secession of Quebec from Canada ([1998] 2 Supreme Court Reporter (SCR) 217.
265
Report of the Special Envoy of the Secretary-General on Kosovo’s future status, U.N. Doc. S/2007/168 (26 March, 2007).
266
Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo (Request for Advisory Opinion), 2010 ICJ Rep 403 (22 July).
267
Alston P, Goodman R. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
268
Protocol No. 13 to European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. 2002. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/QueVoulezVous.asp?NT=187&CL=ENG
269
Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (1948).
270
European Court of Human Rights. Al-Saadoon & Mufdhi v UK, ECtHR (61498/08). 2 AD.
271
European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber). El Masri v. Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, ECtHR, App No. 39630/09. 13 AD.
272
European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber). Ilaşcu v. Moldova and Russia, ECtHR, App no. 48787/99. 8 AD.
273
European Court of Human Rights. Hussein v. Albania & Others, ECtHR, Admissibility Decision, App no. 23276/04. 14 AD.
274
Human Rights Watch. The EU’s Dirty Hands. http://www.hrw.org/reports/2011/09/21/eu-s-dirty-hands-0
275
Al-Nashiri v. Poland, ECtHR, App no. 28761/11 (24 July, 2014).
276
Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro), Judgment, 2007 ICJ Rep 43 (2007).
277
House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Human Rights, The Government’s policy on the use of drones for targeted killing, Second Report of Session 2015–16, HL Paper 141 HC 574 (10 May 2016).
278
Sands PP, Clapham PA, Ghrálaigh BN. Legal Opinion: The Lawfulness of the Authorisation by the United Kingdom of Weapons and Related Items for Export to Saudi Arabia in the Context of Saudi Arabia’s Military Intervention in Yemen (11 December, 2015).
279
Aust HP. Complicity and the law of state responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2011.
280
Bird A. Third State Responsibility for Human Rights Violations. European Journal of International Law. 2010;21:883–900. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chq066
281
Duffy A. Expulsion to Face Torture? Non-refoulement in International Law. International Journal of Refugee Law. 2008;20:373–90. doi: 10.1093/ijrl/een022
282
Nollkaemper A, Jacobs D. Shared Responsibility in International Law. Michigan journal of international law. ;34:359–438.
283
Venice Commission. Opinion on the International Legal Obligations of Council of Europe member states in respect of secret detention facilities and inter-state transport of prisoners, Opinion No. 363/2005, Doc. CDL-AD(2006)009. 17 AD.
284
United Nations. Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. 2001.
285
Noyes JE, Smith BD. State Responsibility and the Principle of Joint and Several Liability. The Yale journal of international law. ;13:225–67.
286
Avbelj M, Fontanelli F, Martinico G, editors. Kadi on trial: a multifaceted analysis of the Kadi trial. London: Routledge 2014.
287
Burns WCG, Osofsky HM. Adjudicating climate change: state, national, and international approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2009.
288
d’Aspremont J, Dopagne F. Kadi: The ECJ’s Reminder of the Elementary Divide between Legal Orders. International Organizations Law Review. 2008;5:371–9. doi: 10.1163/157237408X412970
289
de Burca G. The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order after Kadi. Harvard International Law Journal. ;51:1–49.
290
de Wet E, Vidmar J. Conflicts between international paradigms: Hierarchy versus systemic integration. Global Constitutionalism. ;2:196–217. doi: 10.1017/S2045381713000129
291
Humphreys S. Human rights and climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press 2010.
292
International Council on Human Rights Policy. Beyond Technology Transfer: Protecting Human Rights in a Climate-Constrained World. 2011.
293
Isiksel NT. Fundamental rights in the EU after Kadi and Al Barakaat. European Law Journal. ;16:551–77. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2010.00522.x
294
Kokott J, Sobotta C. The Kadi Case - Constitutional Core Values and International Law - Finding the Balance? European Journal of International Law. 2012;23:1015–24. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chs063
295
Thomas Nagel. The Problem of Global Justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs. ;33:113–47.
296
Pogge TWM. World poverty and human rights: cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity 2008.
297
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. Report of the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on the Relationship Between Climate Change and Human Rights, UN Doc. A/HRC/10/61. 15 AD.
298
Ryngaert C. The European Court of Human Rights’ approach to the responsibility of member states in connection with acts of international organizations. International and Comparative Law Quarterly. ;60:997–1016. doi: 10.1017/S0020589311000467
299
Aurel Sari. The Relationship Between Community Law and International Law after Kadi. International law in a multipolar world. London: Routledge 2013.
300
Symposium: International Human Rights and Climate Change. Georgia journal of international and comparative law. 2010;38:511–797.
301
Uvin P. Human rights and development. Bloomfield, Conn: Kumarian Press 2004.
302
Vizard P. Poverty and human rights: Sen’s ‘capability perspective’ explored. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2006.
303
Ziegler KS. Strengthening the Rule of Law, but Fragmenting International Law: The Kadi Decision of the ECJ from the Perspective of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review. 2009;9:288–305. doi: 10.1093/hrlr/ngp010
304
Alston P, Goodman R. International human rights: text and materials. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
305
Alston P, Macdonald E, Academy of European Law. Human rights, intervention, and the use of force. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2008.
306
United Nations. UN Charter. 1945.
307
Bosphorus Hava Yollari Turizm Ve Ticaret Anonim Sirketi v Ireland (Application 45036/98) 42 EHRR 1, 19 BHRC 299. European Court of Human Rights 2005.
308
European Court of Human Rights (Grand Chamber). Al-Jedda v. UK, ECtHR, App. no. 27021/08. 7 AD.
309
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber). Kadi & Al Barakaat International Foundation v. Council of the EU & Commission of the EU, ECJ C-402/05 P & C-415/05 P. 3 AD.
310
European Court of Justice (Grand Chamber). European Commission v. Kadi, ECJ C-584/10 P & C-595/10 P. 18 AD.
311
de Burca, G. The European Court of Justice and the International Legal Order After Kadi. Harvard International Law Journal. ;51:1–49.
312
Nada v. Switzerland, ECtHR App no 10593/08 (12 September 2012).
313
DE WET E, VIDMAR J. Conflicts between international paradigms: Hierarchy versus systemic integration. Global Constitutionalism. 2013;2:196–217. doi: 10.1017/S2045381713000129
314
International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. The Responsibility to Protect.
315
The Independent International Commission on Kosovo, The Kosovo Report (2000).
316
Dinah Shelton, The Oxford Handbook of International Human Rights Law 2013. http://ucl-primo.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/primo_library/libweb/action/search.do;jsessionid=BBDE8C447BB987EEC948830E0037FE55?cs=frb&ct=frb&frbg=707356124&fctN=facet_frbrgroupid&fctV=707356124&doc=UCL_LMS_DS002234891&lastPag=&lastPagIndx=1&rfnGrp=frbr&frbrSrt=rank&frbrRecordsSource=Primo+Local&frbrJtitleDisplay=&frbrIssnDisplay=&frbrEissnDisplay=&frbrSourceidDisplay=UCL_LMS_DS&query=any%2Ccontains%2CDinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&indx=1&fn=search&dscnt=0&search_scope=CSCOP_UCL&scp.scps=scope%3A(UCL)%2Cprimo_central_multiple_fe&vid=UCL_VU1&onCampus=false&highlight=false&ct=search&institution=UCL&bulkSize=10&tab=local&displayField=title&dym=true&vl(2235343UI0)=any&vl(freeText0)=Dinah%20Shelton%2C%20The%20Oxford%20Handbook%20of%20International%20Human%20Rights%20Law%20(2013)&dstmp=1508443362273&fromDL
317
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, et al. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.
318
Moeckli D, Shah S, Sivakumaran S, et al. International human rights law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2014.
