1.
Wildemuth, B.M.: Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
2.
Jonathan D. Eldredge: Inventory of research methods for librarianship and informatics. Journal of the Medical Library Association. 92, (2004).
3.
Golden, M.P.: Choices and constraints in social research. In: Golden, M.P. (ed.) The Research experience. pp. 3–31. F. E. Peacock, Itasca, Ill. (1976).
4.
Chu, H.: Research methods in library and information science: a content analysis. Library & Information Science Research. 37, 36–41 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.09.003.
5.
Koufogiannakis, D., Crumley, E.: Research in librarianship: issues to consider. Library Hi Tech. 24, 324–340 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1108/07378830610692109.
6.
Leek, J.T., Peng, R.D.: What is the question? Science. 347, 1314–1315 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa6146.
7.
Elfreda A. Chatman: Alienation theory: application of a conceptual framework to a study of information among janitors. RQ. 29, 355–368 (1990).
8.
Wildemuth, B.M.: Developing a research question. In: Wildemuth, B.M. (ed.) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
9.
Wildemuth, B.M.: Questions originating in library and information practice. In: Wildemuth, B.M. (ed.) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
10.
Morgan, C., Wildemuth, B.M.: Questions related to theory. In: Wildemuth, B.M. (ed.) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
11.
Sonnenwald, D.H.: Exploring theory development: learning from diverse masters. In: Sonnenwald, D.H. (ed.) Theory development in the information sciences. University of Texas Press, Austin (2016).
12.
Kuhlthau, C.C.: Reflections on the development of a theoretical perspective. In: Sonnenwald, D.H. (ed.) Theory development in the information sciences. University of Texas Press, Austin (2016).
13.
Thompson, K.M.: Remembering Elfreda Chatman: A champion of theory development in library and information science education. Journal of Education for Library & Information Science. 50, 119–126 (2009).
14.
Wildemuth, B.M.: Testing hypotheses. In: Wildemuth, B.M. (ed.) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
15.
Wildemuth, B.M., Cao, L.L.: Experimental studies. In: Wildemuth, B.M. (ed.) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
16.
Wildemuth, B.M.: Sampling for extensive studies. In: Wildemuth, B.M. (ed.) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
17.
Hank, C., Jordan, M.W., Wildemuth, B.M.: Survey research. In: Wildemuth, B.M. (ed.) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
18.
Dillman, D.A., Smyth, J.D., Christian, L.M.: Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, Hoboken (2014).
19.
Islam, R.L., Murno, L.A.: From perceptions to connections: informing information literacy program planning in academic libraries through examination of high school library media center curricula. College & Research Libraries. 67, 491–514 (2006). https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.67.6.491.
20.
Arab Barometer III, https://arabbarometer.org/content/arab-barometer-iii-0.
21.
United States Institute of Peace: Public opinion in the Arab world: what do the latest surveys tell us?, https://www.usip.org/events/public-opinion-arab-world-what-do-latest-surveys-tell-us.
22.
Wildemuth, B.M.: Descriptive statistics. In: Wildemuth, B.M. (ed.) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
23.
Wildemuth, B.M.: Frequencies, cross-tabulation, and the chi-square statistic. In: Wildemuth, B.M. (ed.) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
24.
Wildemuth, B.M.: Correlation. In: Wildemuth, B.M. (ed.) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
25.
Gillian Byrne: A statistical primer: understanding descriptive and inferential statistics. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. 2, 32–47 (2007).
26.
Levin, J.: Elementary statistics in social research: essentials. Pearson, Boston.
27.
Friedman, A.: Statistics for library and information services: a primer for using open source R software for accessibility and visualization. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Maryland (2016).
28.
Creswell, J.W.: Five qualitative approaches to inquiry. In: Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. pp. 53–84. SAGE, Los Angeles (2013).
29.
Thomas, G., Myers, K.: What is case study? In: The anatomy of the case study. SAGE, London (2015).
30.
Emary, L.R.: Librarians are already in the field: how and why to begin ethnographic fieldwork. Bibliothek Forschung und Praxis. 39, 138–142 (2015).
31.
Kawulich, B.B.: Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum : Qualitative Social Research. 6,.
32.
Moran, B.B.: Continuity and change: the integration of Oxford University’s libraries. The Library Quarterly. 75, 262–294 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1086/497309.
33.
Platt, J.: "Case study” in American methodological thought. Current Sociology. 40, 17–48 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1177/001139292040001004.
34.
Oh, S., Wildemuth, B.M.: Think-aloud protocols. In: Wildemuth, B.M. (ed.) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
35.
Zhang, Y., Wildemuth, B.M.: Unstructured interviews. In: Wildemuth, B.M. (ed.) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
36.
Luo, L., Wildemuth, B.M.: Semistructured interviews. In: Wildemuth, B.M. (ed.) Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science. Libraries Unlimited, Santa Barbara, California (2017).
37.
Myers, M.D., Newman, M.: The qualitative interview in IS research: examining the craft. Information and Organization. 17, 2–26 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2006.11.001.
38.
Berg, S.A., Hoffmann, K., Dawson, D.: Not on the same page: undergraduates’ information retrieval in electronic and print books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 36, 518–525 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2010.08.008.
39.
Rubin, H.J., Rubin, I.S.: Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. SAGE, Los Angeles (2012).
40.
Creswell, J.W.: Data analysis and representation. In: Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. SAGE, Los Angeles (2013).
41.
Pickard, A.J.: Qualitative analysis. In: Research methods in information. pp. 267–281. Facet, London (2013).
42.
Saldaña, J.: The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE, Los Angeles, Calif (2016).
43.
Smale, M.A.: Demystifying the IRB: human subjects research in academic libraries. portal: Libraries and the Academy. 10, 309–321 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.0.0114.
44.
Clark, A.: Haunted by images? Ethical moments and anxieties in visual research. Methodological Innovations Online. 8, 68–81 (2013). https://doi.org/10.4256/mio.2013.014.
45.
SAGE Research Methods: What every researcher needs, http://methods.sagepub.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/.
46.
UNC College of Arts & Sciences: Literature reviews, http://writingcenter.unc.edu/tips-and-tools/literature-reviews/.
47.
American Psychological Association: Publication manual of the American Psychological Association. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2010).