1.
Newton, K., van Deth, J.W.: The development of the modern state. In: Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
2.
Clark, W.R., Golder, M., Golder, S.N.: The origins of the modern state. In: Principles of comparative politics. CQ Press, Los Angeles (2013).
3.
Caramani, D.: The nation-state. In: Comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
4.
Wimmer, A., Min, B.: From Empire to Nation-State: Explaining Wars in the Modern World, 1816-2001. American Sociological Review. 71, 867–897 (2006).
5.
Adams, J.: The familial state: ruling families and merchant capitalism in early modern Europe. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, N.Y. (2005).
6.
Bates, R.H.: When Things Fell Apart: State Failure in Late-Century Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008).
7.
Ertman, T.: Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997).
8.
Evans, P.: The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in an Era of Globalization. World Politics. 50, 62–87 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100014726.
9.
Evans, P.B., Rueschemeyer, D., Skocpol, T.: Bringing the state back in. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1985).
10.
Gorski, P.S.: The disciplinary revolution: Calvinism and the rise of the state in early modern Europe. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2003).
11.
Herbst, J.I.: States and power in Africa: comparative lessons in authority and control. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (2000).
12.
Jackson, R.H., Rosberg, C.G.: Why Africa’s Weak States Persist: The Empirical and the Juridical in Statehood. World Politics. 35, 1–24 (1982).
13.
Mann, M.: The Sources of Social Power: Volume 2: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
14.
Melleuish, G.: The State in World History: Perspectives and Problems. Australian Journal of Politics and History. 48, 322–335 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8497.00263.
15.
Scott, J.C.: Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press, New Haven, [Conn.] (1998).
16.
Slaughter, A.-M.: The Real New World Order. Foreign Affairs. 76, 183–197 (1997).
17.
Tilly, C.: The formation of national states in Western Europe. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1975).
18.
Tilly, C.: Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1992. Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass (1992).
19.
Vu, T.: Studying the State through State Formation. World Politics. 62, (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109990244.
20.
Newton, K., van Deth, J.W.: State and democracy. In: Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
21.
Clark et al., W.R.: Chapter 5 Democracy and dictatorship: conceptualization and measurement. In: Principles of Comparative Politics. SAGE Publications US (2017).
22.
Caramani, D.: Democracies. In: Comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
23.
Bueno de Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R.M., Morrow, J.D.: Reining in the prince. In: The logic of political survival. pp. 1–34. MIT, Cambridge, Mass (2005).
24.
Collier, D., Adcock, R.: Democracy and Dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts. Annual Review of Political Science. 2, 537–565 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.537.
25.
Boix, C.: Democracy, Development, and the International System. The American Political Science Review. 809–828 (2011).
26.
Boix, C., Miller, M., Rosato, S.: A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800-2007. Comparative Political Studies. 46, 1523–1554 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463905.
27.
Cheibub, J.A., Gandhi, J., Vreeland, J.R.: Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice. 143, 67–101 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9491-2.
28.
Dahl, R.A.: Polyarchy: participation and opposition. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn (1971).
29.
Diamond, L.J.: Three Paradoxes of Democracy. Journal of Democracy. 1, 48–60 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1990.0047.
30.
Diamond, L., Morlino, L.: The Quality of Democracy: An Overview. Journal of Democracy. 20–31 (2004).
31.
Munck, G.L., Verkuilen, J.: Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices. Comparative Political Studies. 35, 5–34 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1177/001041400203500101.
32.
Olson, M.: Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. The American Political Science Review. 87, 567–576 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/2938736.
33.
Pemstein, D., Meserve, S.A., Melton, J.: Democratic Compromise: A Latent Variable Analysis of Ten Measures of Regime Type. Political Analysis. 18, 426–449 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq020.
34.
Phillipe, S., Terry Lynne, K.: What Democracy Is...And Is Not. Journal of Democracy. 2, 75–88 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1991.0033.
35.
Schumpeter, J.A.: Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge, London (1992).
36.
Weingast, B.R.: The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law. The American Political Science Review. 91, 245–263 (1997). https://doi.org/10.2307/2952354.
37.
Clark et al., W.R.: Chapter 10: Varieties of dictatorship. In: Principles of Comparative Politics. SAGE Publications US (2017).
38.
Caramani, D.: Democracies. In: Comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
39.
Svolik, M.W.: The World of Authoritarian Politics. In: The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. pp. 19–50. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139176040.002.
40.
Brooker, P.: Non-democratic regimes. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2009).
41.
Brzezinski, Z.: Totalitarianism and Rationality. The American Political Science Review. 50, 751–763 (1956).
42.
Gandhi, J.: Political institutions under dictatorship. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008).
43.
Gandhi, J., Przeworski, A.: Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats. Comparative Political Studies. 40, 1279–1301 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414007305817.
44.
Lai, B., Slater, D.: Institutions of the Offensive: Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes, 1950-1992. American Journal of Political Science. 50, 113–126 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00173.x.
45.
Levitsky, S., Way, L.A.: Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
46.
Levitsky, S., Way, L.: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy. 13, 51–65 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0026.
47.
Malesky, E., Schuler, P.: Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament. American Political Science Review. 104, 482–502 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000250.
48.
Malesky, E., Schuler, P.: The Single-Party Dictator’s Dilemma: Information in Elections without Opposition. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 36, 491–530 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-9162.2011.00025.x.
49.
Schedler, A.: Electoral authoritarianism: the dynamics of unfree competition. Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder, Colo (2006).
50.
Svolik, M.W.: The Politics of Authoritarian Rule. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
51.
Wintrobe, R.: The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).
52.
Wright, J.: Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment. American Journal of Political Science. 52, 322–343 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00315.x.
53.
Clark, W.R., Golder, M., Golder, S.N.: Principles of comparative politics. CQ Press, Los Angeles (2013).
54.
Newton, K., van Deth, J.W.: Democratic change and persistence. In: Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
55.
Geddes, B.: What Causes Democratization? In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.003.0014.
56.
Acemoglu, D., Robinson, J.A.: Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510809.
57.
Boix, C., Stokes, S.C.: Endogenous Democratization. World Politics. 55, 517–549 (2003).
58.
Elkins, Z.: Diffusion and the Constitutionalization of Europe. Comparative Political Studies. 43, 969–999 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010370433.
59.
Huntington, S.P.: The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman [Okla.] (1991).
60.
Levitsky, S., Way, L.: International Linkage and Democratization. Journal of Democracy. 16, 20–34 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2005.0048.
61.
Linz, J.J., Stepan, A.C.: Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1996).
62.
Mares, I.: From Open Secrets to Secret Voting. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2015). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316178539.
63.
O’Donnell, G.A., Schmitter, P.C., Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Latin American Program: Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (2013).
64.
Przeworski, A.: Democracy and the Market. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139172493.
65.
Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M.E., Cheibub, J.A., Limongi, F.: Democracy and Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804946.
66.
Slater, D.: Revolutions, Crackdowns, and Quiescence: Communal Elites and Democratic Mobilization in Southeast Asia1. American Journal of Sociology. 115, 203–254 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1086/597796.
67.
Svolik, M.: Authoritarian Reversals and Democratic Consolidation. American Political Science Review. 102, (2008). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080143.
68.
Whitehead, L.: Democratization: theory and experience. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002).
69.
Clark, W.R., Golder, M., Golder, S.N.: What is science? In: Principles of comparative politics. CQ Press, Los Angeles (2013).
70.
Caramani, D.: Comparative politics. In: Comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
71.
King, G., Verba, S., Keohane, R.O.: Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1994).
72.
Brady, H.E., Collier, D.: Refocussing the discussion of methodology. In: Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham, Md (2004).
73.
Caramani, D.: Federal and local government institutions. In: Comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
74.
Geddes, B.: Paradigms and sand castles: theory building and research design in comparative politics. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2003).
75.
Hall, P.A., Taylor, R.C.R.: Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies. 44, 936–957 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x.
76.
Levi, M.: Reconsiderations of Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis. In: Lichbach, M.I. and Zuckerman, A.S. (eds.) Comparative Politics. pp. 117–133. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804007.006.
77.
Schmidt, V.A.: Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science. 11, 303–326 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342.
78.
Thelen, K.: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 2, 369–404 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369.
79.
Bates, R.H.: Analytic narratives. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1998).
80.
Gerring, J.: What is a case study good for? In: Case study research: principles and practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007).
81.
Laitin, D.D.: Comparative Politics: The State of the Sub-Discipline. In: Katznelson, I. and Milner, H. (eds.) Political science: the state of the discipline. pp. 630–659. W.W. Norton, New York, N.Y. (2002).
82.
Newton, K., van Deth, J.W.: Constitutions. In: Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
83.
Clark, W.R., Golder, M., Golder, S.N.: Institutional veto players. In: Principles of comparative politics. CQ Press, Los Angeles (2013).
84.
Caramani, D.: Constitutions and judicial power. In: Comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
85.
Newton, K., van Deth, J.W.: Multi-level government: international, national and sub-national. In: Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
86.
Caramani, D.: Federal and local government institutions. In: Comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
87.
Bermeo, N.G.: The Import of Institutions. Journal of Democracy. 13, 96–110 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2002.0021.
88.
Constitute Project, https://www.constituteproject.org/.
89.
Democratization Special Issue ‘Democratization and the Judiciary: the Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies’. 10, (2003).
90.
Dotan, Y.: Legal Defeats--Political Wins: Why Do Elected Representatives Go to Court? Comparative Political Studies. 38, 75–103 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004270969.
91.
Ferejohn, J., Rosenbluth, E., Shipan, C.: Comparative Judicial Politics. In: Boix, C. and Stokes, S.C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics Less... Morestatesauthoritarianismpartiesvoterscollective actioninstitutionselectoral systemsfederalismjudiciarybureaucracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.003.0030.
92.
Elkins, Z., Ginsburg, T., Melton, J.: The Endurance of National Constitutions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817595.
93.
Hirschl, R.: The Judicialization of Politics. In: Caldeira, G.A., Kelemen, R.D., and Whittington, K.E. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics Less... Morepolitical sciencejurisprudenceconstitutionalismjudicial politicslaw and societycomparative judicial politicsinternational lawdemocratizationlawpolitics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0008.
94.
Hooghe, L., Marks, G.: Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. The American Political Science Review. 97, 233–243 (2003).
95.
Regional Authority Index, http://www.unc.edu/~gwmarks/data_ra.php.
96.
North, D.C., Weingast, B.R.: Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England. The Journal of Economic History. 49, (1989). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700009451.
97.
Romeu, F.R.: The Establishment of Constitutional Courts: A Study of 128 Democratic Constitutions. Review of Law & Economics. 2, 1–33 (2006).
98.
Sartori, G.: Comparative constitutional engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. New York University Press, Washington Square, N.Y. (1997).
99.
Sweet, A.S.: Governing with Judges. Oxford University Press (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/0198297718.001.0001.
100.
Tate, C.N., Vallinder, T.: The global expansion of judicial power. New York University Press, New York (1995).
101.
Whittington, K.E.: "Interpose Your Friendly Hand”: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court. American Political Science Review. 99, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051890.
102.
Newton, K., Deth, J.W. van: Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
103.
Clark, W.R., Golder, M., Golder, S.N.: Principles of comparative politics. CQ Press, Los Angeles (2013).
104.
Caramani, D.: Comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
105.
Arter, D.: Comparing and classifying legislatures. Routledge, London (2007).
106.
Cheibub, J.A.: Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006).
107.
Cox, G.W.: The efficient secret: the Cabinet and the development of political parties in Victorian England. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987).
108.
Druckman, J.N.: Context and Coalition-Bargaining: Comparing Portfolio Allocation in Eastern and Western Europe. Party Politics. 11, 535–555 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068805054979.
109.
Duverger, M., Lijphart, A., Pasquino, G.: A new political system. European Journal of Political Research. 31, 125–146 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1997.tb00769.x.
110.
Laver, M., Schofield, N.: Multiparty government: the politics of coalition in Europe. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1998).
111.
Lijphart, A.: Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. Yale University Press, New Haven [Conn.] (1999).
112.
Lijphart, A.: Power-sharing versus Majority Rule: Patterns of Cabinet Formation in Twenty Democracies. Government and Opposition. 16, 395–413 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.1981.tb00319.x.
113.
Linz, J.: The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy. 1, 51–69 (1990).
114.
Poguntke, T., Webb, P.: The Presidentialization of Politics. Oxford University Press (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/0199252017.001.0001.
115.
Samuels, D.: Presidentialism and Accountability for the Economy in Comparative Perspective. American Political Science Review. 98, (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540400125X.
116.
Siaroff, A.: Comparative presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary distinction. European Journal of Political Research. 42, 287–312 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00084.
117.
Strøm, K., Müller, W.C., Bergman, T.: Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford University Press (2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/019829784X.001.0001.
118.
Strom, K.: Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies: The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions. Comparative Political Studies. 17, 199–227 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414084017002004.
119.
Shugart, M.S.: Comparative Executive-Legislative Relations. In: Binder, S.A., Rhodes, R.A.W., and Rockman, B.A. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions Less... Morepolitical scienceconstitutionsfederalismbureaucracyconstructed nature of institutionsnew institutionalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548460.003.0018.
120.
Newton, K., Deth, J.W. van: Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
121.
Clark, W.R., Golder, M., Golder, S.N.: Principles of Comparative Politics. SAGE Publications US (2017).
122.
Caramani, D.: Comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
123.
Caramani, D.: Social movements. In: Comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
124.
Adams, J., Somer-Topcu, Z.: Policy Adjustment by Parties in Response to Rival Parties’ Policy Shifts: Spatial Theory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in Twenty-Five Post-War Democracies. British Journal of Political Science. 39, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409000635.
125.
Berger, S.: Organizing interests in Western Europe: pluralism, corporatism, and the transformation of politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981).
126.
The Economist: International: The party’s (largely) over; Political parties. The Economist. 71–72.
127.
Katz, R.S., Mair, P.: Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics. 1, 5–28 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068895001001001.
128.
Klingemann, H.-D., Hofferbert, R.I., Budge, I.: Parties, policies, and democracy. Westview Press, Boulder (1994).
129.
Kitschelt, H., Wilkinson, S.I.: Citizen–politician linkages: an introduction. In: Kitschelt, H. and Wilkinson, S.I. (eds.) Patrons, Clients, and Policies. pp. 1–49. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511585869.001.
130.
Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J.W., Giugni, M.G.: New social movements and political opportunities in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research. 22, 219–244 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00312.x.
131.
Lindberg, S.I.: Institutionalization of Party Systems? Stability and Fluidity among Legislative Parties in Africa’s Democracies. Government and Opposition. 42, 215–241 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00219.x.
132.
Lipset, S.M., Rokkan, S.: Party systems and voter alignments: cross-national perspectives: [Contributors: Robert R. Alford and others]. Free Press, New York (1967).
133.
Mair, P.: Partyless Democracy. New Left Review. 2, 15–21 (2000).
134.
Manifesto Project Database, https://manifestoproject.wzb.eu/.
135.
McLean, I.: Review Article: The Divided Legacy of Mancur Olson. British Journal of Political Science. 30, 651–668 (2000).
136.
Norris, P.: Electoral engineering: voting rules and political behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004).
137.
Olson, M.: The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1971).
138.
Riker, W.H.: The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger’s Law. Comparative Politics. 9, (1976). https://doi.org/10.2307/421293.
139.
Rueda, D.: Insider–Outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies: The Challenge to Social Democratic Parties. American Political Science Review. 99, (2005). https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540505149X.
140.
Newton, K., Deth, J.W. van: Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
141.
Clark et al., W.R.: Chapter 7: Cultural determinants of dictatorship and democracy. In: Principles of Comparative Politics. SAGE Publications US (2017).
142.
Caramani, D.: Political culture. In: Comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
143.
Almond, G.A., Verba, S.: The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Sage, Newbury Park, Calif (1989).
144.
Bartle, J., Dellepiane-Avellaneda, S., Stimson, J.: The Moving Centre: Preferences for Government Activity in Britain, 1950–2005. British Journal of Political Science. 41, 259–285 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123410000463.
145.
Brooks, C., Manza, J.: Do Changing Values Explain the New Politics? A critical assessment of the postmaterialist thesis. The Sociological Quarterly. 35, 541–570 (1994).
146.
Clements, B., Field, C.D.: Public Opinion toward Homosexuality and Gay Rights in Great Britain. Public Opinion Quarterly. 78, 523–547 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfu018.
147.
Graaf, N.D.D., Evans, G.: Why are the Young more Postmaterialist?: A Cross-National Analysis of Individual and Contextual Influences on Postmaterial Values. Comparative Political Studies. 28, 608–635 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414096028004005.
148.
Guber, D.L.: A Cooling Climate for Change? Party Polarization and the Politics of Global Warming. American Behavioral Scientist. 57, 93–115 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764212463361.
149.
Hall, P.A.: Social Capital in Britain. British Journal of Political Science. 29, 417–461 (1999).
150.
Inglehart, R.: Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J (1990).
151.
Inglehart, R.F.: Changing Values among Western Publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics. 31, 130–146 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380701834747.
152.
John, P., Fieldhouse, E., Liu, H.: How Civic is the Civic Culture? Explaining Community Participation Using the 2005 English Citizenship Survey. Political Studies. 59, 230–252 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00891.x.
153.
Norris, P.: Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011).
154.
Paxton, P.: Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship. American Sociological Review. 67, 254–277 (2002).
155.
Putnam, R.D.: Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster, New York (2000).
156.
Putnam, R.D., Leonardi, R., Nanetti, R.: Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1993).
157.
Skocpol, T.: Diminished democracy: from membership to management in American civic life. University of Oklahoma Press, Norman (2003).
158.
Tilley, J.R.: Research Note: Libertarian-authoritarian Value Change in Britain, 1974-2001. Political Studies. 53, 442–453 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00537.x.
159.
Clark, W.R., Golder, M., Golder, S.N.: Principles of comparative politics. CQ Press, Los Angeles (2013).
160.
Przeworski, A.: Institutions Matter? Government and Opposition. 39, 527–540 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00134.x.
161.
Caramani, D.: Comparative politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
162.
Alesina, A., Glaeser, E.L.: Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: a world of difference. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004).
163.
Barnes, L., Hall, P.A.: Neoliberalism and Social Resilience in the Developed Democracies. In: Hall, P.A. and Lamont, M. (eds.) Social Resilience in the Neo-Liberal Era. pp. 209–238. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139542425.013.
164.
Tsebelis, G., Russell Sage Foundation: Veto players: how political institutions work. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2002).
165.
Bawn, K., Rosenbluth, F.: Short versus Long Coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the Size of the Public Sector. American Journal of Political Science. 50, 251–265 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00182.x.
166.
Frey, B.S., Stutzer, A.: Happiness, Economy and Institutions. The Economic Journal. 110, 918–938 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00570.
167.
Iversen, T., Rosenbluth, F.: The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross-National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap. American Journal of Political Science. 50, 1–19 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00166.x.
168.
Lake, D.A., Baum, M.A.: The Invisible Hand of Democracy: Political Control and the Provision of Public Services. Comparative Political Studies. 34, 587–621 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414001034006001.
169.
Miller, M.K.: Electoral Authoritarianism and Human Development. Comparative Political Studies. 48, 1526–1562 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015582051.
