1.
Newton K, van Deth JW. The development of the modern state. In: Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
2.
Clark WR, Golder M, Golder SN. The origins of the modern state. In: Principles of comparative politics. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: CQ Press; 2013.
3.
Caramani D. The nation-state. In: Comparative politics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
4.
Wimmer A, Min B. From Empire to Nation-State: Explaining Wars in the Modern World, 1816-2001. American Sociological Review [Internet]. 2006;71(6):867–97. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25472435
5.
Adams J. The familial state: ruling families and merchant capitalism in early modern Europe. Vol. The Wilder House series in politics, history, and culture. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press; 2005.
6.
Bates RH. When Things Fell Apart: State Failure in Late-Century Africa [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790713
7.
Ertman T. Birth of the Leviathan: Building States and Regimes in Medieval and Early Modern Europe [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511529016
8.
Evans P. The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in an Era of Globalization. World Politics. 1997;50(01):62–87.
9.
Evans PB, Rueschemeyer D, Skocpol T. Bringing the state back in. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1985.
10.
Gorski PS. The disciplinary revolution: Calvinism and the rise of the state in early modern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2003.
11.
Herbst JI. States and power in Africa: comparative lessons in authority and control. Vol. Princeton studies in international history and politics. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2000.
12.
Jackson RH, Rosberg CG. Why Africa’s Weak States Persist: The Empirical and the Juridical in Statehood. World Politics [Internet]. 1982;35(1):1–24. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2010277
13.
Mann M. The Sources of Social Power: Volume 2: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914 [Internet]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139381314
14.
Melleuish G. The State in World History: Perspectives and Problems. Australian Journal of Politics and History. 2002;48(3):322–35.
15.
Scott JC. Seeing like a state: how certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Vol. Yale agrarian studies. New Haven, [Conn.]: Yale University Press; 1998.
16.
Slaughter AM. The Real New World Order. Foreign Affairs [Internet]. 1997;76(5):183–97. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20048208
17.
Tilly C. The formation of national states in Western Europe. Vol. Studies in political development. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1975.
18.
Tilly C. Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1992. Rev. pbk. ed. Vol. Studies in social discontinuity. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell; 1992.
19.
Vu T. Studying the State through State Formation. World Politics. 2010;62(01).
20.
Newton K, van Deth JW. State and democracy. In: Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
21.
Clark et al. WR. Chapter 5 Democracy and dictatorship: conceptualization and measurement. In: Principles of Comparative Politics [Internet]. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications US; 2017. Available from: https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/649298
22.
Caramani D. Democracies. In: Comparative politics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
23.
Bueno de Mesquita B, Smith A, Siverson RM, Morrow JD. Reining in the prince. In: The logic of political survival [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT; 2005. p. 1–34. Available from: http://ls-tlss.ucl.ac.uk/course-materials/POLS6011_77303.pdf
24.
Collier D, Adcock R. Democracy and Dichotomies: A Pragmatic Approach to Choices about Concepts. Annual Review of Political Science. 1999;2(1):537–65.
25.
Boix C. Democracy, Development, and the International System. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 2011;(4):809–28. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23275354
26.
Boix C, Miller M, Rosato S. A Complete Data Set of Political Regimes, 1800-2007. Comparative Political Studies. 2013;46(12):1523–54.
27.
Cheibub JA, Gandhi J, Vreeland JR. Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice. 2010;143(1–2):67–101.
28.
Dahl RA. Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 1971.
29.
Diamond LJ. Three Paradoxes of Democracy. Journal of Democracy. 1990;1(3):48–60.
30.
Diamond L, Morlino L. The Quality of Democracy: An Overview. Journal of Democracy [Internet]. 2004;(4):20–31. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/195557911?OpenUrlRefId=info:xri/sid:primo&accountid=14511
31.
Munck GL, Verkuilen J. Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: Evaluating Alternative Indices. Comparative Political Studies. 2002;35(1):5–34.
32.
Olson M. Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 1993;87(3):567–76. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2938736
33.
Pemstein D, Meserve SA, Melton J. Democratic Compromise: A Latent Variable Analysis of Ten Measures of Regime Type. Political Analysis. 2010;18(4):426–49.
34.
Phillipe S, Terry Lynne K. What Democracy Is...And Is Not. Journal of Democracy [Internet]. 1991;2(3):75–88. Available from: https://muse.jhu.edu/journals/journal_of_democracy/v002/2.3schmitter.pdf
35.
Schumpeter JA. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. 5th ed. London: Routledge; 1992.
36.
Weingast BR. The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 1997;91(2):245–63. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2952354
37.
Clark et al. WR. Chapter 10: Varieties of dictatorship. In: Principles of Comparative Politics [Internet]. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications US; 2017. Available from: https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/649298
38.
Caramani D. Democracies. In: Comparative politics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
39.
Svolik MW. The World of Authoritarian Politics. In: The Politics of Authoritarian Rule [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. p. 19–50. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139176040A012
40.
Brooker P. Non-democratic regimes. Rev. and updated 2nd ed. Vol. Comparative government and politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2009.
41.
Brzezinski Z. Totalitarianism and Rationality. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 1956;50(3):751–63. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1951557
42.
Gandhi J. Political institutions under dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
43.
Gandhi J, Przeworski A. Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats. Comparative Political Studies. 2007;40(11):1279–301.
44.
Lai B, Slater D. Institutions of the Offensive: Domestic Sources of Dispute Initiation in Authoritarian Regimes, 1950-1992. American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50(1):113–26.
45.
Levitsky S, Way LA. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War [Internet]. Vol. Problems of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781353
46.
Levitsky S, Way L. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy. 2002;13(2):51–65.
47.
Malesky E, Schuler P. Nodding or Needling: Analyzing Delegate Responsiveness in an Authoritarian Parliament. American Political Science Review. 2010;104(03):482–502.
48.
Malesky E, Schuler P. The Single-Party Dictator’s Dilemma: Information in Elections without Opposition. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 2011;36(4):491–530.
49.
Schedler A. Electoral authoritarianism: the dynamics of unfree competition. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 2006.
50.
Svolik MW. The Politics of Authoritarian Rule [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139176040
51.
Wintrobe R. The Political Economy of Dictatorship [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174916
52.
Wright J. Do Authoritarian Institutions Constrain? How Legislatures Affect Economic Growth and Investment. American Journal of Political Science. 2008;52(2):322–43.
53.
Clark WR, Golder M, Golder SN. Principles of comparative politics. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: CQ Press; 2013.
54.
Newton K, van Deth JW. Democratic change and persistence. In: Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
55.
Geddes B. What Causes Democratization? In: The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199566020-e-14
56.
Acemoglu D, Robinson JA. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511510809
57.
Boix C, Stokes SC. Endogenous Democratization. World Politics [Internet]. 2003;55(4):517–49. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25054237
58.
Elkins Z. Diffusion and the Constitutionalization of Europe. Comparative Political Studies. 2010;43(8–9):969–99.
59.
Huntington SP. The third wave: democratization in the late twentieth century. Vol. The Julian J. Rothbaum distinguished lecture series. Norman [Okla.]: University of Oklahoma Press; 1991.
60.
Levitsky S, Way L. International Linkage and Democratization. Journal of Democracy. 2005;16(3):20–34.
61.
Linz JJ, Stepan AC. Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1996.
62.
Mares I. From Open Secrets to Secret Voting [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2015. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781316178539
63.
O’Donnell GA, Schmitter PC, Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars. Latin American Program. Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2013.
64.
Przeworski A. Democracy and the Market [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139172493
65.
Przeworski A, Alvarez ME, Cheibub JA, Limongi F. Democracy and Development [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511804946
66.
Slater D. Revolutions, Crackdowns, and Quiescence: Communal Elites and Democratic Mobilization in Southeast Asia1. American Journal of Sociology [Internet]. 2009;115(1):203–54. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/597796
67.
Svolik M. Authoritarian Reversals and Democratic Consolidation. American Political Science Review. 2008;102(02).
68.
Whitehead L. Democratization: theory and experience [Internet]. Vol. Oxford studies in democratization. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0199253285.001.0001
69.
Clark WR, Golder M, Golder SN. What is science? In: Principles of comparative politics. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: CQ Press; 2013.
70.
Caramani D. Comparative politics. In: Comparative politics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
71.
King G, Verba S, Keohane RO. Designing social inquiry: scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1994.
72.
Brady HE, Collier D. Refocussing the discussion of methodology. In: Rethinking social inquiry: diverse tools, shared standards. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield; 2004.
73.
Caramani D. Federal and local government institutions. In: Comparative politics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
74.
Geddes B. Paradigms and sand castles: theory building and research design in comparative politics. Vol. Analytical perspectives on politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2003.
75.
Hall PA, Taylor RCR. Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms. Political Studies. 1996;44(5):936–57.
76.
Levi M. Reconsiderations of Rational Choice in Comparative and Historical Analysis. In: Lichbach MI, Zuckerman AS, editors. Comparative Politics [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 117–33. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511804007A012
77.
Schmidt VA. Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse. Annual Review of Political Science. 2008;11(1):303–26.
78.
Thelen K. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics. Annual Review of Political Science. 1999;2(1):369–404.
79.
Bates RH. Analytic narratives. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1998.
80.
Gerring J. What is a case study good for? In: Case study research: principles and practices [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780511319686
81.
Laitin DD. Comparative Politics: The State of the Sub-Discipline. In: Katznelson I, Milner H, editors. Political science: the state of the discipline. Centennial ed. New York, N.Y.: W.W. Norton; 2002. p. 630–59.
82.
Newton K, van Deth JW. Constitutions. In: Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
83.
Clark WR, Golder M, Golder SN. Institutional veto players. In: Principles of comparative politics. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: CQ Press; 2013.
84.
Caramani D. Constitutions and judicial power. In: Comparative politics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
85.
Newton K, van Deth JW. Multi-level government: international, national and sub-national. In: Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
86.
Caramani D. Federal and local government institutions. In: Comparative politics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
87.
Bermeo NG. The Import of Institutions. Journal of Democracy. 2002;13(2):96–110.
88.
Constitute Project [Internet]. Available from: https://www.constituteproject.org/
89.
Democratization Special Issue ‘Democratization and the Judiciary: the Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies’. 2003;10(4). Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/fdem20/10/4
90.
Dotan Y. Legal Defeats--Political Wins: Why Do Elected Representatives Go to Court? Comparative Political Studies. 2005;38(1):75–103.
91.
Ferejohn J, Rosenbluth E, Shipan C. Comparative Judicial Politics. In: Boix C, Stokes SC, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics Less. Morestatesauthoritarianismpartiesvoterscollective actioninstitutionselectoral systemsfederalismjudiciarybureaucracy [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199566020
92.
Elkins Z, Ginsburg T, Melton J. The Endurance of National Constitutions [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511817595
93.
Hirschl R. The Judicialization of Politics. In: Caldeira GA, Kelemen RD, Whittington KE, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics Less. Morepolitical sciencejurisprudenceconstitutionalismjudicial politicslaw and societycomparative judicial politicsinternational lawdemocratizationlawpolitics [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199208425
94.
Hooghe L, Marks G. Unraveling the Central State, but How? Types of Multi-Level Governance. The American Political Science Review [Internet]. 2003;97(2):233–43. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3118206
95.
Regional Authority Index [Internet]. Available from: http://www.unc.edu/~gwmarks/data_ra.php
96.
North DC, Weingast BR. Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England. The Journal of Economic History. 1989;49(04).
97.
Romeu FR. The Establishment of Constitutional Courts: A Study of 128 Democratic Constitutions. Review of Law & Economics [Internet]. 2006;2(1):1–33. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=bth&AN=22342214&site=ehost-live&scope=site
98.
Sartori G. Comparative constitutional engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. 2nd ed. Washington Square, N.Y.: New York University Press; 1997.
99.
Sweet AS. Governing with Judges [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2000. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0198297718.001.0001/acprof-9780198297710
100.
Tate CN, Vallinder T. The global expansion of judicial power. New York: New York University Press; 1995.
101.
Whittington KE. "Interpose Your Friendly Hand”: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court. American Political Science Review. 2005;99(04).
102.
Newton K, Deth JW van. Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. 2nd ed. Vol. Cambridge textbooks in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
103.
Clark WR, Golder M, Golder SN. Principles of comparative politics. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: CQ Press; 2013.
104.
Caramani D. Comparative politics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
105.
Arter D. Comparing and classifying legislatures. Vol. The library of legislative studies. London: Routledge; 2007.
106.
Cheibub JA. Presidentialism, Parliamentarism, and Democracy [Internet]. Vol. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813344
107.
Cox GW. The efficient secret: the Cabinet and the development of political parties in Victorian England. Vol. Political economy of institutions and decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987.
108.
Druckman JN. Context and Coalition-Bargaining: Comparing Portfolio Allocation in Eastern and Western Europe. Party Politics. 2005;11(5):535–55.
109.
Duverger M, Lijphart A, Pasquino G. A new political system. European Journal of Political Research. 1997;31(1–2):125–46.
110.
Laver M, Schofield N. Multiparty government: the politics of coalition in Europe. Vol. Ann Arbor paperbacks. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1998.
111.
Lijphart A. Patterns of democracy: government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven [Conn.]: Yale University Press; 1999.
112.
Lijphart A. Power-sharing versus Majority Rule: Patterns of Cabinet Formation in Twenty Democracies. Government and Opposition. 1981;16(4):395–413.
113.
Linz J. The Perils of Presidentialism. Journal of Democracy [Internet]. 1990;1(1):51–69. Available from: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/jod/summary/v001/1.1linz.html
114.
Poguntke T, Webb P. The Presidentialization of Politics [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0199252017.001.0001/acprof-9780199252015
115.
Samuels D. Presidentialism and Accountability for the Economy in Comparative Perspective. American Political Science Review. 2004;98(03).
116.
Siaroff A. Comparative presidencies: The inadequacy of the presidential, semi-presidential and parliamentary distinction. European Journal of Political Research. 2003;42(3):287–312.
117.
Strøm K, Müller WC, Bergman T. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2003. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/019829784X.001.0001/acprof-9780198297840
118.
Strom K. Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies: The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions. Comparative Political Studies. 1984;17(2):199–227.
119.
Shugart MS. Comparative Executive-Legislative Relations. In: Binder SA, Rhodes RAW, Rockman BA, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions Less. Morepolitical scienceconstitutionsfederalismbureaucracyconstructed nature of institutionsnew institutionalism [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. Available from: http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548460.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199548460
120.
Newton K, Deth JW van. Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. 2nd ed. Vol. Cambridge textbooks in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
121.
Clark WR, Golder M, Golder SN. Principles of Comparative Politics [Internet]. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications US; 2017. Available from: https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/649298
122.
Caramani D. Comparative politics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
123.
Caramani D. Social movements. In: Comparative politics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
124.
Adams J, Somer-Topcu Z. Policy Adjustment by Parties in Response to Rival Parties’ Policy Shifts: Spatial Theory and the Dynamics of Party Competition in Twenty-Five Post-War Democracies. British Journal of Political Science. 2009;39(04).
125.
Berger S. Organizing interests in Western Europe: pluralism, corporatism, and the transformation of politics. Vol. Cambridge studies in modern political economies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1981.
126.
The Economist. International: The party’s (largely) over; Political parties. The Economist [Internet]. (8705):71–2. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/759723461?accountid=14511
127.
Katz RS, Mair P. Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics. 1995;1(1):5–28.
128.
Klingemann HD, Hofferbert RI, Budge I. Parties, policies, and democracy. Vol. Theoretical lenses on public policy. Boulder: Westview Press; 1994.
129.
Kitschelt H, Wilkinson SI. Citizen–politician linkages: an introduction. In: Kitschelt H, Wilkinson SI, editors. Patrons, Clients, and Policies [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 1–49. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511585869A010
130.
Kriesi H, Koopmans R, Duyvendak JW, Giugni MG. New social movements and political opportunities in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research. 1992;22(2):219–44.
131.
Lindberg SI. Institutionalization of Party Systems? Stability and Fluidity among Legislative Parties in Africa’s Democracies. Government and Opposition. 2007;42(2):215–41.
132.
Lipset SM, Rokkan S. Party systems and voter alignments: cross-national perspectives: [Contributors: Robert R. Alford and others]. Vol. International yearbook of political behavior research. New York: Free Press; 1967.
133.
Mair P. Partyless Democracy. New Left Review [Internet]. 2000;2:15–21. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1301913219?rfr_id=info%3Axri%2Fsid%3Aprimo
134.
Manifesto Project Database [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://manifestoproject.wzb.eu/
135.
McLean I. Review Article: The Divided Legacy of Mancur Olson. British Journal of Political Science [Internet]. 2000;30(04):651–68. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/194289
136.
Norris P. Electoral engineering: voting rules and political behaviour [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780511313615
137.
Olson M. The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Vol. Harvard economic studies. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1971.
138.
Riker WH. The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger’s Law. Comparative Politics. 1976;9(1).
139.
Rueda D. Insider–Outsider Politics in Industrialized Democracies: The Challenge to Social Democratic Parties. American Political Science Review. 2005;99(01).
140.
Newton K, Deth JW van. Foundations of comparative politics: democracies of the modern world. 2nd ed. Vol. Cambridge textbooks in comparative politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010.
141.
Clark et al. WR. Chapter 7: Cultural determinants of dictatorship and democracy. In: Principles of Comparative Politics [Internet]. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications US; 2017. Available from: https://app.kortext.com/Shibboleth.sso/Login?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&target=https://app.kortext.com/borrow/649298
142.
Caramani D. Political culture. In: Comparative politics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
143.
Almond GA, Verba S. The civic culture: political attitudes and democracy in five nations. [New ed.]. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage; 1989.
144.
Bartle J, Dellepiane-Avellaneda S, Stimson J. The Moving Centre: Preferences for Government Activity in Britain, 1950–2005. British Journal of Political Science. 2011;41(02):259–85.
145.
Brooks C, Manza J. Do Changing Values Explain the New Politics? A critical assessment of the postmaterialist thesis. The Sociological Quarterly [Internet]. 1994;35(4):541–70. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4121518
146.
Clements B, Field CD. Public Opinion toward Homosexuality and Gay Rights in Great Britain. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2014;78(2):523–47.
147.
Graaf NDD, Evans G. Why are the Young more Postmaterialist?: A Cross-National Analysis of Individual and Contextual Influences on Postmaterial Values. Comparative Political Studies. 1996;28(4):608–35.
148.
Guber DL. A Cooling Climate for Change? Party Polarization and the Politics of Global Warming. American Behavioral Scientist. 2013;57(1):93–115.
149.
Hall PA. Social Capital in Britain. British Journal of Political Science [Internet]. 1999;29(3):417–61. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/194145
150.
Inglehart R. Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press; 1990.
151.
Inglehart RF. Changing Values among Western Publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics. 2008;31(1–2):130–46.
152.
John P, Fieldhouse E, Liu H. How Civic is the Civic Culture? Explaining Community Participation Using the 2005 English Citizenship Survey. Political Studies. 2011;59(2):230–52.
153.
Norris P. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973383
154.
Paxton P. Social Capital and Democracy: An Interdependent Relationship. American Sociological Review [Internet]. 2002;67(2):254–77. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3088895
155.
Putnam RD. Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster; 2000.
156.
Putnam RD, Leonardi R, Nanetti R. Making democracy work: civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1993.
157.
Skocpol T. Diminished democracy: from membership to management in American civic life. Vol. Julian J. Rothbaum distinguished lecture series. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 2003.
158.
Tilley JR. Research Note: Libertarian-authoritarian Value Change in Britain, 1974-2001. Political Studies. 2005;53(2):442–53.
159.
Clark WR, Golder M, Golder SN. Principles of comparative politics. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: CQ Press; 2013.
160.
Przeworski A. Institutions Matter? Government and Opposition. 2004;39(4):527–40.
161.
Caramani D. Comparative politics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
162.
Alesina A, Glaeser EL. Fighting poverty in the US and Europe: a world of difference. Vol. Rodolfo Debenedetti lectures. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
163.
Barnes L, Hall PA. Neoliberalism and Social Resilience in the Developed Democracies. In: Hall PA, Lamont M, editors. Social Resilience in the Neo-Liberal Era [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013. p. 209–38. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781139542425A020
164.
Tsebelis G, Russell Sage Foundation. Veto players: how political institutions work. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2002.
165.
Bawn K, Rosenbluth F. Short versus Long Coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the Size of the Public Sector. American Journal of Political Science. American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50(2):251–65.
166.
Frey BS, Stutzer A. Happiness, Economy and Institutions. The Economic Journal. 2000;110(466):918–38.
167.
Iversen T, Rosenbluth F. The Political Economy of Gender: Explaining Cross-National Variation in the Gender Division of Labor and the Gender Voting Gap. American Journal of Political Science. 2006;50(1):1–19.
168.
Lake DA, Baum MA. The Invisible Hand of Democracy: Political Control and the Provision of Public Services. Comparative Political Studies. 2001;34(6):587–621.
169.
Miller MK. Electoral Authoritarianism and Human Development. Comparative Political Studies. 2015;48(12):1526–62.
