1.
Frediani AA, Monson T, Ossul Vermehren I. Campaigning through Images: Exploring Housing Rights in North London. Published online 2016. https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/programmes/postgraduate/msc-social-development-practice/in-practice/london-based-fieldwork/SDP_London_Report_2016
2.
Bradbury H. Introduction: how to Situate and Define Action Research. In: The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. SAGE Publications; 2015:1-9. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/reader.action?docID=2120425&ppg=46
3.
Belda S, Boni A, Peris J, Terol L. Rethinking capacity development for critical development practice. Inquiry into a postgraduate programme. Journal of International Development. 2012;24(5):571-584. doi:10.1002/jid.2850
4.
Chambers R. Chapter 3: Professional Realities. In: Whose Reality Counts?: Putting the First Last. Intermediate Technology; 1997:34-55.
5.
Clarke P, Oswald K. Introduction: Why Reflect Collectively on Capacities for Change? IDS Bulletin. 2010;41(3):1-12. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00132.x
6.
Frediani AA, Monson T, Butcher S, eds. Reclaiming Regeneration: Negotiating a Citizens Charter for Euston Area. Published online 2015. https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/programmes/postgraduate/msc-social-development-practice/London-based-fieldwork/index/edit/2015_report_reclaiming_regeneration_Euston
7.
Frediani AA, Butcher S, Hirst L, eds. Regeneration Aspirations for Euston: Local Perspectives on High Speed Two Rail Link. https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/programmes/postgraduate/msc-social-development-practice/in-practice/collaborations/regeneratoinaspirations
8.
Frediani AA, De Carli B, Nunez Ferrera I, N. Shinkins. Change by Design: New Spatial Imaginations for Los Pinos. Published online 2013. https://issuu.com/beatricedecarli/docs/cbd2013_lp_report_en-download
9.
Kumar S. Conceptual specifications. In: Methods for Community Participation: A Complete Guide for Practitioners. Practical Action Publishing; 2002:23-52. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c388f2bd-8836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
10.
Frediani AA. Sen’s Capability Approach as a framework to the practice of development. Development in Practice. 2010;20(2):173-187. doi:10.1080/09614520903564181
11.
Frediani AA. Amartya Sen, the World Bank, and the Redress of Urban Poverty: A Brazilian Case Study. Journal of Human Development. 2007;8(1):133-152. doi:10.1080/14649880601101473
12.
Ibrahim S. Introduction: The Capability Approach: From Theory to Practice — Rationale, Review and Reflections. In: Ibrahim S, Tiwari M, eds. The Capability Approach. Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2014:1-28. doi:10.1057/9781137001436_1
13.
Frediani AA, Hansen J. The Capability Approach in Development Planning and Urban Design. Published online 2015. http://www.wholesem.ac.uk/bartlett/dpu/latest/publications/dpu-working-papers/WP_173-178_SPECIAL_ISSUE_ON_CAPABILITY_APPROACH_FINAL.pdf
14.
Frediani AA. ‘Participatory Capabilities’ in Development Practice. Published online 2015. https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/latest/publications/dpu-working-papers/WP178.pdf
15.
Frediani AA. An Agency-Oriented Exploration of Capabilities: Reflections from the UNDP 2010 Brasil Ponto a Ponto Campaign. In: Ibrahim S, Tiwari M, eds. The Capability Approach. Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2014. doi:10.1057/9781137001436
16.
Frediani AA. Space and capabilities: approaching informal settlement upgrading through a capability perspective. In: Lemanski C, Marx C, eds. The City in Urban Poverty. Vol EADI global development series. Palgrave Macmillan; 2015.
17.
Bengtsson B. Housing as a Social Right: Implications for Welfare State Theory. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2001;24(4):255-275. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.00056
18.
Fitzpatrick S, Bengtsson B, Watts B. Rights to Housing: Reviewing the Terrain and Exploring a Way Forward. Housing, Theory and Society. 2014;31(4):447-463. doi:10.1080/14036096.2014.923506
19.
KING P. Housing as a Freedom Right. Housing Studies. 2003;18(5):661-672. doi:10.1080/02673030304259
20.
Rolnik R. (A/HRC/25/54/Add.2): Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context. Published online 2014. http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Housing/Pages/CountryVisits.aspx
21.
Kothari M, Karmali S, Chaudhry S. The Human Right to Adequate Housing and Land. Published online 2006. http://www.rwi.lu.se/NHRIDB/Asia/India/Housing.pdf
22.
Rolnik R. Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing: Women and the right to housing. Published online 2011. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Housing/A-HRC-19-53_en.pdf
23.
OHCHR. Fact Sheet No. 21, The Human Right to Adequate Housing. Published online 2009. http://www.refworld.org/docid/479477400.html
24.
Luttrell W, Chalfen R. Lifting up voices of participatory visual research. Visual Studies. 2010;25(3):197-200. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2010.523270
25.
Purcell R. Images for change: community development, community arts and photography. Community Development Journal. 2007;44(1):111-122. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsm031
26.
Carlson ED, Engebretson J, Chamberlain RM. Photovoice as a Social Process of Critical Consciousness. Qualitative Health Research. 2006;16(6):836-852. doi:10.1177/1049732306287525
27.
Dodman DR. Shooting in the city: an autophotographic exploration of the urban environment in Kingston, Jamaica. Area. 2003;35(3):293-304. doi:10.1111/1475-4762.00178
28.
Holgate J, Keles J, Kumarappan L. Visualizing ‘community’: an experiment in participatory photography among Kurdish diasporic workers in London. The Sociological Review. 2012;60(2):312-332. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02075.x
29.
Nykiforuk CIJ, Vallianatos H, Nieuwendyk LM. Photovoice as a Method for Revealing Community Perceptions of the Built and Social Environment. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2011;10(2):103-124. doi:10.1177/160940691101000201
30.
PhotoVoice - Statement of Ethical Practice. Published online 2009. http://www.photovoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/pvethicalpractice.pdf
31.
Packard J. ‘I’m gonna show you what it’s really like out here’: the power and limitation of participatory visual methods. Visual Studies. 2008;23(1):63-77. doi:10.1080/14725860801908544
32.
Prins E. Participatory photography: A tool for empowerment or surveillance? Action Research. 2010;8(4):426-443. doi:10.1177/1476750310374502
33.
Jennifer Thompson. Picturing gendered water spaces: A textual approach to water in rural Sierra Leone. Agenda. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10130950.2011.575996
34.
Wang C, Burris MA. Empowerment through Photo Novella: Portraits of Participation. Health Education & Behavior. 1994;21(2):171-186. doi:10.1177/109019819402100204
35.
Wang CC. Youth Participation in Photovoice as a Strategy for Community Change. Journal of Community Practice. 2006;14(1-2):147-161. doi:10.1300/J125v14n01_09
36.
Life Through The Lens (Basti Ram, India). http://www.bastiram.org/
37.
PhotoVoice (NGO facilitating projects in the UK and internationally). https://photovoice.org/projects/
38.
PhotoVoice practitioner resources: https://photovoice.org/resources/
39.
Participate Initiative. https://participationpower.wordpress.com/2013/11/28/work-with-us-community-driven-research-inspiring-change/
40.
ODI Digital Stories & other examples. https://www.odi.org/projects/2622-transforming-cash-transfers-beneficiary-and-community-perspectives-social-protection-programming
41.
Mayoux L. Quantitative, Qualitative or Participatory? Which Method, for What and When? In: Doing Development Research. SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2006:115-129. doi:10.4135/9781849208925.n13
42.
Beazley H. Participatory Methods and Approaches: Tackling the Two Tyrannies. In: Doing Development Research. SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2006:189-199. doi:10.4135/9781849208925.n20
43.
Desai V, Potter R. Doing Development Research. SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2006. doi:10.4135/9781849208925
44.
Kumar S. Methods for Community Participation: A Complete Guide for Practitioners. Practical Action Publishing; 2002.
45.
Theis J, Grady HM, International Institute for Environment and Development, Save the Children. Participatory Rapid Appraisal for Community Development: A Training Manual Based on Experiences in the Middle East and North Africa. International Institute for Environment and Development; 1991.
46.
Creswell JW. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 4th ed. SAGE Publications; 2014.
47.
Fisher S. Working with Conflict: Skills and Strategies for Action. Zed Books; 2000.
48.
Laws S, Harper C, Marcus R. Research for Development. SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2003. doi:10.4135/9781849209786
49.
Thomas A, Chataway J, Wuyts M. Finding out Fast: Investigative Skills for Policy and Development. Sage Publications in association with the Open University; 1998.
50.
Methods for Development Work and Research: A New Guide for Practitioners. SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd; 2005. doi:10.4135/9788132108566
51.
Willis K. Interviewing. In: Doing Development Research. SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2006:144-152. doi:10.4135/9781849208925.n15
52.
Lloyd-Evans S. Focus Groups. In: Doing Development Research. SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2006:153-162. doi:10.4135/9781849208925.n16
53.
Simon D. Your Questions Answered? Conducting Questionnaire Surveys. In: Doing Development Research. SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2006:163-171. doi:10.4135/9781849208925.n17
54.
Mikkelsen B. Data Construction and Analysis of Qualitative Data. In: Methods for Development Work and Research: A New Guide for Practitioners. 2nd ed. SAGE; 2005. doi:10.4135/9788132108566.n5
55.
Ian C, Barry G. Social Mix and the ‘Balanced Community’ in British housing policy - a tale of two epochs. GeoJournal. 2000;51(4):351-360. http://search.proquest.com/docview/223677969?accountid=14511
56.
Hodgkinson S, Watt P, Mooney G, eds. Critical Social Policy - Themed Section: Social Housing, Privatisation and Neoliberalism. 33. http://csp.sagepub.com/content/33/1.toc
57.
Ratcliffe P. Housing inequality and ‘race’: some critical reflections on the concept of ‘social exclusion’. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 1999;22(1):1-22. doi:10.1080/014198799329576
58.
Anderson I, Christian J. Causes of homelessness in the UK: a dynamic analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 2003;13(2):105-118. doi:10.1002/casp.714
59.
Imrie R. Disability, embodiment and the meaning of the home. Housing Studies. 2004;19(5):745-763. doi:10.1080/0267303042000249189
60.
Malos E, Hague G. Women, housing, homelessness and domestic violence. Women’s Studies International Forum. 1997;20(3):397-409. doi:10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00023-X
61.
Means R. Safe as Houses? Ageing in Place and Vulnerable Older People in the UK. Social Policy & Administration. 2007;41(1):65-85. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00539.x
62.
Tomas A, Dittmar H. The experience of homeless women: An exploration of housing histories and the meaning of home. Housing Studies. 1995;10(4):493-515. doi:10.1080/02673039508720834
63.
Robinson D. New immigrants and migrants in social housing in Britain: discursive themes and lived realities. Policy & Politics. 2010;38(1):57-77. doi:10.1332/030557309X458407
64.
EARLE L. From Insurgent to Transgressive Citizenship: Housing, Social Movements and the Politics of Rights in São Paulo. Journal of Latin American Studies. 2012;44(01):97-126. doi:10.1017/S0022216X11001118
65.
Teppo A, Millstein M. The place of gentrification in Cape Town. In: Lees L, Shin HB, López Morales E, eds. Global Gentrifications: Uneven Development and Displacement. The Policy Press; 2015:419-440. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a8420035-af08-e711-80c9-005056af4099
66.
Butcher S, Apsan Frediani A. Insurgent citizenship practices: The case of Muungano wa Wanavijiji in Nairobi, Kenya. City. 2014;18(2):119-133. doi:10.1080/13604813.2014.896637
67.
Cabannes Y, Guimarães Yafai S, Johnson C. How people face evictions. https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/publications/dpu-book-15/edit/dpu/latest/publications/dpu-books/How_people_face_evictions.pdf
68.
G. C. A New Alliance for the City? Opportunities and Challenges of a (Globalizing) Right to the City Movement. In: Cities for All: Proposals and Experiences towards the Right to the City. ; 2010. http://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/citiesalliance.org/files/Cities_For_All_ENG.pdf
69.
Chatterjee P. Chapter 3: The politics of the governed. In: The Politics of the Governed: Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World. Vol University seminars/Leonard Hastings Schoff memorial lectures. Columbia University Press; 2004.
70.
Kothari M. The global struggle for the right to a place to live. Development in Practice. 1997;7(1):5-16. doi:10.1080/09614529754710
71.
Mathivet C. Take Back the Land! The Social Function of Land and Housing, Resistances and Alternatives. Mathivet C, ed. Published online 2014. http://aitec.reseau-ipam.org/IMG/pdf/Pass10_Pages-EN-OKweb.pdf
72.
N. SJ, L. Z, M.S. E MS. Moving toward the Implementation of the Right to the City in Latin America and Internationally. Published online 2015. http://www.righttothecityplatform.org.br/download/publicacoes/00%20Reseach_moving%20toward%20the%20implementatio%20of%20the%20Right%20to%20the%20City%282%29.pdf
73.
Habitat III Issue Papers 20 Housing. Published online 2015. http://unhabitat.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Habitat-III-Issue-Paper-20_Housing-2.0.pdf
74.
L. Z. The Right to the City: Struggles and proposals for the urban reform. In: Moksnes H, Melin M, eds. Claiming the City: Civil Society Mobilisation by the Urban Poor. ; 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-227423
75.
Gaventa J, Cornwall A. Power and Knowledge. In: The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. SAGE Publications Ltd; 2008:172-189. doi:10.4135/9781848607934.n17
76.
Schon D. The structure of reflection in action. In: Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. Basic Books; 2008:128-167. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=13d6a457-8b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
77.
Brun C, Lund R. Real-time research: decolonising research practices – or just another spectacle of researcher–practitioner collaboration? Development in Practice. 2010;20(7):812-826. doi:10.1080/09614524.2010.508107
78.
Jupp E. Participation, local knowledge and empowerment: researching public space with young people. Environment and Planning A. 2007;39(12):2832-2844. doi:10.1068/a38204
79.
Marshall J. Self-reflective Inquiry Practices. In: The Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice. SAGE; 2001:433-439.
80.
Mauthner NS, Doucet A. Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis. Sociology. 2003;37(3):413-431. doi:10.1177/00380385030373002
81.
Sarkissian W, Hurford D. Chapter 8 – ‘Learning at the margins: Margo Fryer and Pamela Ponic on Deconstructing Power and Privilege’. In: Creative Community Planning: Transformative Engagement Methods for Working at the Edge. Vol Tools for community planning. Earthscan; 2010.
82.
Strauss AL. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press; 1987. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511557842
83.
Theis J, Grady H. Participatory Rapid Appraisal for Community Development. Published online 1991. http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/8282IIED.pdf?
84.
Turner JFC. Learning in time of paradigm change: The role of the professional. In: The Challenge of Sustainable Cities: Neoliberalism and Urban Strategies in Developing Countries. Zed; 1997. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=98c292a3-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
85.
Wills J. Making Class Politics Possible: Organizing Contract Cleaners in London. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2008;32(2):305-323. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00783.x
86.
Wills J. The geography of community and political organisation in London today. Political Geography. 2012;31(2):114-126. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.11.003
87.
McNiff J. Writing and presenting action research reports (pp144-158 in Part III: How do we share our knowledge?). In: Action Research: Principles and Practice. 3rd ed. Taylor and Francis; 2013. http://ucl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1143676
88.
Desai V, Potter R. ‘Writing an Effective Research Report or Dissertation’ and ‘How is Research Communicated Professionally?’ In: Doing Development Research. SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2006. doi:10.4135/9781849208925
89.
Clackman A. The PhotoVoice Manual. Published online 2007. https://photovoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/PV_Manual.pdf
90.
Clark-Ibáñez, Marisol. Framing the Social World With Photo-Elicitation Interviews. The American Behavioral Scientist. 47(12):1507-1527. doi:10.1177/0002764204266236
91.
Holgate J, Keles J, Kumarappan L. Visualizing ‘community’: an experiment in participatory photography among Kurdish diasporic workers in London. The Sociological Review. 2012;60(2):312-332. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02075.x
92.
Orellana MF. Space and place in an Urban Landscape: Learning from children’s views of their social worlds. Visual Sociology. 1999;14(1):73-89. doi:10.1080/14725869908583803
93.
Fraley JM. Images of force: the power of maps in community development. Community Development Journal. 2011;46(4):421-435. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsq011
94.
Luttrell W, Chalfen R. Lifting up voices of participatory visual research. Visual Studies. 2010;25(3):197-200. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2010.523270
95.
Kaplan I, Miles S, Howes A. Images and the ethics of inclusion and exclusion: learning through participatory photography in education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 2011;11(3):195-202. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01192.x
96.
Tinkler P. A fragmented picture: reflections on the photographic practices of young people. Visual Studies. 2008;23(3):255-266. doi:10.1080/14725860802489916
97.
Meo A. Picturing Students’ Habitus: The Advantages and Limitations of Photo-Elicitation Interviewing in a Qualitative Study in the City of Buenos Aires. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2010;9(2):149-171. doi:10.1177/160940691000900203
98.
Joanou JP. The bad and the ugly: ethical concerns in participatory photographic methods with children living and working on the streets of Lima, Peru. Visual Studies. 2009;24(3):214-223. doi:10.1080/14725860903309120
99.
Piper H, Frankham J. Seeing Voices and Hearing Pictures: Image as discourse and the framing of image-based research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 2007;28(3):373-387. doi:10.1080/01596300701458954
100.
Purcell R. Images for change: community development, community arts and photography. Community Development Journal. 2007;44(1):111-122. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsm031
101.
Woodley-Baker R. Private and public experience captured: young women capture their everyday lives and dreams through photo-narratives. Visual Studies. 2009;24(1):19-35. doi:10.1080/14725860902732694
102.
Avritzer L. Democratizing urban policy in Brazil: participation and the right to the city. In: Citizen Action and National Policy Reform: Making Change Happen. Vol Claiming citizenship : rights, participation, accountability. Zed Books; 2010.
103.
Dunn C. A fresh breeze blows in Bahia. Americas. 1994;46(3):28-37. https://search.proquest.com/docview/235254203?accountid=14511
104.
Maricato E. Fighting for Just Cities in capitalism’s periphery. In: Searching for the Just City: Debates in Urban Theory and Practice. Vol Questioning cities series. Routledge; 2009. http://www.tandfebooks.com/isbn/9780203878835
105.
Reiter B. The Limits of Popular Participation in Salvador, Brazil. Journal of Developing Societies. 2008;24(3):337-354. doi:10.1177/0169796X0802400302
106.
Rolnik R. Ten years of the City Statute in Brazil: from the struggle for urban reform to the World Cup cities. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development. 2013;5(1):54-64. doi:10.1080/19463138.2013.782706
107.
Elena Tarsi. Citizens’ participation in the urban regeneration of informal settlements: policy innovations and their limits in the Nova Constituinte neighborhood in the city of Salvador, Brazil.
108.
Tarsi E. Chapter 17: Heritage tourism and displacement in Salvador da Bahia. In: Porter L, Shaw K, eds. Whose Urban Renaissance? An International Comparison of Urban Regeneration Strategies. ; 2009:164-179. doi:10.4324/9780203884539
109.
Arnold, JensJalles, João. Dividing the Pie in Brazil: Income Distribution, Social Policies and the New Middle Class. OECD Economic Department Working Papers. (1105). http://search.proquest.com/docview/1491113444/E4863D1A05074F82PQ/1?accountid=14511
110.
Burton G. An End to Poverty in Brazil? An Assessment of the Lula and Rousseff Governments’ Poverty Reduction and Elimination Strategies. Journal of Policy Practice. 2013;12(3):194-215. doi:10.1080/15588742.2013.796203
111.
Frediani AA. Amartya Sen, the World Bank, and the Redress of Urban Poverty: A Brazilian Case Study. Journal of Human Development. 2007;8(1):133-152. doi:10.1080/14649880601101473
112.
Moretto A. Brazil’s strategy against poverty: The Bolsa Familia and Brasil Sem Miséria. In: Fakier K, Ehmke E, eds. Socio-Economic Insecurity in Emerging Economies: Building New Spaces. Vol Routledge explorations in development studies. Routledge; 2014.
113.
Paes-Sousa R, Vaitsman J. The Zero Hunger and Brazil without Extreme Poverty programs: a step forward in Brazilian social protection policy. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2014;19(11):4351-4360. doi:10.1590/1413-812320141911.08812014
114.
Pero V, Szerman D. The New Generation of Social Programs in Brazil. In: Adato M, Hoddinott J, eds. Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America. ; 2010. http://www.ifpri.org/publication/conditional-cash-transfers-latin-america
115.
UN Habitat. Scaling-Up Affordable Housing Supply in Brazil: The ‘My House My Life’ Programme. Published 2013. http://unhabitat.org/scaling-up-affordable-housing-supply-in-brazil/
116.
Baiocchi G. Radicals in Power: The Workers’ Party (PT) and Experiments in Urban Democracy. Zed Books; 2003.
117.
Belda-Miquel S, Peris Blanes J, Frediani A. Institutionalization and Depoliticization of the Right to the City: Changing Scenarios for Radical Social Movements. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2016;40(2):321-339. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12382
118.
De Carli B, Apsan A, Barbosa B, Comarú F, de Sousa R. Regeneration through the ‘Pedagogy of Confrontation’: Exploring the Critical Spatial Practices of Social Movements in Inner City São Paulo as Avenues for Urban Renewal. Dearq Revista de Arquitectura / Journal of Architecture. 2015;(16):146-161. doi:10.18389/dearq16.2015.10
119.
De Carli B, Frediani AA. Insurgent Regeneration: Spatial Practices of Citizenship in the Rehabilitation of Inner-City São Paulo. GeoHumanities. 2016;2(2):331-353. doi:10.1080/2373566X.2016.1235984
120.
Earle L. From Insurgent to Transgressive Citizenship: Housing, Social Movements and the Politics of Rights in São Paulo. 2012;44(1):97-126. https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9A1135F4DE695BDFF042EEC797C9DB7F/S0022216X11001118a.pdf/div-class-title-from-insurgent-to-transgressive-citizenship-housing-social-movements-and-the-politics-of-rights-in-sao-paulo-div.pdf
121.
Jovchelovitch S, Priego-Hernández J. Underground Sociabilities: Identity, Culture and Resistance in Rio de Janeiro’s Favelas. UNESCO; 2013. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/53678/1/Priego-Hernandez_2013_Underground_sociabilities.pdf
122.
Keisha‐Khan YP. The roots of black resistance: race, gender and the struggle for urban land rights in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Social Identities. 2004;10(6):811-831. doi:10.1080/1350463042000324283
123.
KEISHA-KHAN Y. PERRY. Black Women against the Land Grab. University of Minnesota Press; 5749. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt5hjjrr
124.
King-Calnek JE. Education for Citizenship: Interethnic Pedagogy and Formal Education at Escola Criativa Olodum. The Urban Review. 2006;38(2):145-164. doi:10.1007/s11256-006-0028-4
125.
Della Porta D. Bridging research on democracy, social movements and communication. In: Cammaerts B, Mattoni A, McCurdy P, eds. Mediation and Protest Movements. Intellect; 2013. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1160345
126.
Allen A, Lambert R, Apsan Frediani A, Ome T. Can participatory mapping activate spatial and political practices? Mapping popular resistance and dwelling practices in Bogotá eastern hills. Area. 2015;47(3):261-271. doi:10.1111/area.12187
127.
Campkin B, Duijzings G, eds. Engaged Urbanism: Cities & Methodologies. I.B. Tauris; 2016.
128.
Hodgson DL, Schroeder RA. Dilemmas of Counter-Mapping Community Resources in Tanzania. Development and Change. 2002;33(1):79-100. doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00241
129.
McFarlane C. Learning the City. Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. doi:10.1002/9781444343434
130.
Milan S, ed. Social Movements and Their Technologies: Wiring Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.
131.
Gumucio Dagron A, Tufte T, Communication for Social Change Consortium. Communication for Social Change Anthology: Historical and Contemporary Readings. Communication for Social Change Consortium; 2006.
132.
Rodgers S, Barnett C, Cochrane A. Media practices and urban politics: Conceptualizing the powers of the media-urban nexus. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2014;32(6):1054-1070. doi:10.1068/d13157p
133.
Fernandes E. Constructing the `Right To the City’ in Brazil. Social & Legal Studies. 2007;16(2):201-219. doi:10.1177/0964663907076529
134.
David Harvey. The Right to the City. New Left Review. 53:21-40. https://newleftreview.org/II/53/david-harvey-the-right-to-the-city
135.
Lefebvre H. Writings on Cities. (Kofman E, Lebas E, eds.). Blackwell Publishing; 1996.
136.
Mathivet C, ed. Unveiling the Right to the City: Representations, Uses and Instrumentalization of the Right to the City. Published online 2016. http://www.uclg-cisdp.org/en/news/latest-news/unveiling-right-city
137.
Mayer M. The ‘right to the city’ in urban social movements. In: Brenner N, Marcuse P, Mayer M, eds. Cities for People Not for Profit: Critical Urban Theory & the Right to the City. ; 2012:63-85. http://www.tandfebooks.com/doi/view/10.4324/9780203802182
138.
Smith MP, McQuarrie M. Remaking Urban Citizenship: Organizations, Institutions, and the Right to the City. Vol Comparative urban and community research. Transaction; 2012.
139.
Purcell M. Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal. 2002;58(2/3):99-108. doi:10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f
