1
Frediani AA, Monson T, Ossul Vermehren I. Campaigning through Images: Exploring Housing Rights in North London. 2016.https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/programmes/postgraduate/msc-social-development-practice/in-practice/london-based-fieldwork/SDP_London_Report_2016
2
Bradbury H. Introduction: how to Situate and Define Action Research. In: The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. SAGE Publications 2015. 1–9.https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/reader.action?docID=2120425&ppg=46
3
Belda S, Boni A, Peris J, et al. Rethinking capacity development for critical development practice. Inquiry into a postgraduate programme. Journal of International Development 2012;24:571–84. doi:10.1002/jid.2850
4
Chambers R. Chapter 3: Professional Realities. In: Whose reality counts?: putting the first last. London: : Intermediate Technology 1997. 34–55.
5
Clarke P, Oswald K. Introduction: Why Reflect Collectively on Capacities for Change? IDS Bulletin 2010;41:1–12. doi:10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00132.x
6
Frediani AA, Monson T, Butcher S, editors. Reclaiming Regeneration: Negotiating a Citizens Charter for Euston Area. 2015.https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/programmes/postgraduate/msc-social-development-practice/London-based-fieldwork/index/edit/2015_report_reclaiming_regeneration_Euston
7
Frediani AA, Butcher S, Hirst L, editors. Regeneration Aspirations for Euston: Local Perspectives on High Speed Two Rail Link. https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/programmes/postgraduate/msc-social-development-practice/in-practice/collaborations/regeneratoinaspirations
8
Frediani AA, De Carli B, Nunez Ferrera I, et al. Change by Design: New Spatial Imaginations for Los Pinos. 2013.https://issuu.com/beatricedecarli/docs/cbd2013_lp_report_en-download
9
Kumar S. Conceptual specifications. In: Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. Rugby: : Practical Action Publishing 2002. 23–52.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c388f2bd-8836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
10
Frediani AA. Sen’s Capability Approach as a framework to the practice of development. Development in Practice 2010;20:173–87. doi:10.1080/09614520903564181
11
Frediani AA. Amartya Sen, the World Bank, and the Redress of Urban Poverty: A Brazilian Case Study. Journal of Human Development 2007;8:133–52. doi:10.1080/14649880601101473
12
Ibrahim S. Introduction: The Capability Approach: From Theory to Practice — Rationale, Review and Reflections. In: Ibrahim S, Tiwari M, eds. The Capability Approach. London: : Palgrave Macmillan UK 2014. 1–28. doi:10.1057/9781137001436_1
13
Frediani AA, Hansen J. The Capability Approach in Development Planning and Urban Design. 2015.http://www.wholesem.ac.uk/bartlett/dpu/latest/publications/dpu-working-papers/WP_173-178_SPECIAL_ISSUE_ON_CAPABILITY_APPROACH_FINAL.pdf
14
Frediani AA. ‘Participatory Capabilities’ in Development Practice. 2015.https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/latest/publications/dpu-working-papers/WP178.pdf
15
Frediani AA. An Agency-Oriented Exploration of Capabilities: Reflections from the UNDP 2010 Brasil Ponto a Ponto Campaign. In: Ibrahim S, Tiwari M, eds. The Capability Approach. London: : Palgrave Macmillan UK 2014. doi:10.1057/9781137001436
16
Frediani AA. Space and capabilities: approaching informal settlement upgrading through a capability perspective. In: Lemanski C, Marx C, eds. The city in urban poverty. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2015.
17
Bengtsson B. Housing as a Social Right: Implications for Welfare State Theory. Scandinavian Political Studies 2001;24:255–75. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.00056
18
Fitzpatrick S, Bengtsson B, Watts B. Rights to Housing: Reviewing the Terrain and Exploring a Way Forward. Housing, Theory and Society 2014;31:447–63. doi:10.1080/14036096.2014.923506
19
KING P. Housing as a Freedom Right. Housing Studies 2003;18:661–72. doi:10.1080/02673030304259
20
Rolnik R. (A/HRC/25/54/Add.2): Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context. 2014.http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Housing/Pages/CountryVisits.aspx
21
Kothari M, Karmali S, Chaudhry S. The Human Right to Adequate Housing and Land. 2006.http://www.rwi.lu.se/NHRIDB/Asia/India/Housing.pdf
22
Rolnik R. Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing: Women and the right to housing. 2011.http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Housing/A-HRC-19-53_en.pdf
23
OHCHR. Fact Sheet No. 21, The Human Right to Adequate Housing. 2009.http://www.refworld.org/docid/479477400.html
24
Luttrell W, Chalfen R. Lifting up voices of participatory visual research. Visual Studies 2010;25:197–200. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2010.523270
25
Purcell R. Images for change: community development, community arts and photography. Community Development Journal 2007;44:111–22. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsm031
26
Carlson ED, Engebretson J, Chamberlain RM. Photovoice as a Social Process of Critical Consciousness. Qualitative Health Research 2006;16:836–52. doi:10.1177/1049732306287525
27
Dodman DR. Shooting in the city: an autophotographic exploration of the urban environment in Kingston, Jamaica. Area 2003;35:293–304. doi:10.1111/1475-4762.00178
28
Holgate J, Keles J, Kumarappan L. Visualizing ‘community’: an experiment in participatory photography among Kurdish diasporic workers in London. The Sociological Review 2012;60:312–32. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02075.x
29
Nykiforuk CIJ, Vallianatos H, Nieuwendyk LM. Photovoice as a Method for Revealing Community Perceptions of the Built and Social Environment. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2011;10:103–24. doi:10.1177/160940691101000201
30
PhotoVoice - Statement of Ethical Practice. 2009.http://www.photovoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/pvethicalpractice.pdf
31
Packard J. ‘I’m gonna show you what it’s really like out here’: the power and limitation of participatory visual methods. Visual Studies 2008;23:63–77. doi:10.1080/14725860801908544
32
Prins E. Participatory photography: A tool for empowerment or surveillance? Action Research 2010;8:426–43. doi:10.1177/1476750310374502
33
Jennifer Thompson. Picturing gendered water spaces: A textual approach to water in rural Sierra Leone. Agendahttp://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10130950.2011.575996
34
Wang C, Burris MA. Empowerment through Photo Novella: Portraits of Participation. Health Education & Behavior 1994;21:171–86. doi:10.1177/109019819402100204
35
Wang CC. Youth Participation in Photovoice as a Strategy for Community Change. Journal of Community Practice 2006;14:147–61. doi:10.1300/J125v14n01_09
36
Life Through The Lens (Basti Ram, India). http://www.bastiram.org/
37
PhotoVoice (NGO facilitating projects in the UK and internationally). https://photovoice.org/projects/
38
PhotoVoice practitioner resources: https://photovoice.org/resources/
39
Participate Initiative. https://participationpower.wordpress.com/2013/11/28/work-with-us-community-driven-research-inspiring-change/
40
ODI Digital Stories & other examples. https://www.odi.org/projects/2622-transforming-cash-transfers-beneficiary-and-community-perspectives-social-protection-programming
41
Mayoux L. Quantitative, Qualitative or Participatory? Which Method, for What and When? In: Doing Development Research. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : : SAGE Publications, Ltd 2006. 115–29. doi:10.4135/9781849208925.n13
42
Beazley H. Participatory Methods and Approaches: Tackling the Two Tyrannies. In: Doing Development Research. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : : SAGE Publications, Ltd 2006. 189–99. doi:10.4135/9781849208925.n20
43
Desai V, Potter R. Doing Development Research. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : : SAGE Publications, Ltd 2006. doi:10.4135/9781849208925
44
Kumar S. Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. Rugby: : Practical Action Publishing 2002.
45
Theis J, Grady HM, International Institute for Environment and Development, et al. Participatory rapid appraisal for community development: a training manual based on experiences in the Middle East and North Africa. London: : International Institute for Environment and Development 1991.
46
Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: : SAGE Publications 2014.
47
Fisher S. Working with conflict: skills and strategies for action. London: : Zed Books 2000.
48
Laws S, Harper C, Marcus R. Research for Development. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : : SAGE Publications, Ltd 2003. doi:10.4135/9781849209786
49
Thomas A, Chataway J, Wuyts M. Finding out fast: investigative skills for policy and development. London: : Sage Publications in association with the Open University 1998.
50
Methods for Development Work and Research: A New Guide for Practitioners. B-42, Panchsheel Enclave, New Delhi 110 017 India : : SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd 2005. doi:10.4135/9788132108566
51
Willis K. Interviewing. In: Doing Development Research. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : : SAGE Publications, Ltd 2006. 144–52. doi:10.4135/9781849208925.n15
52
Lloyd-Evans S. Focus Groups. In: Doing Development Research. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : : SAGE Publications, Ltd 2006. 153–62. doi:10.4135/9781849208925.n16
53
Simon D. Your Questions Answered? Conducting Questionnaire Surveys. In: Doing Development Research. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : : SAGE Publications, Ltd 2006. 163–71. doi:10.4135/9781849208925.n17
54
Mikkelsen B. Data Construction and Analysis of Qualitative Data. In: Methods for development work and research: a new guide for practitioners. New Delhi: : SAGE 2005. doi:10.4135/9788132108566.n5
55
Ian C, Barry G. Social Mix and the ‘Balanced Community’ in British housing policy - a tale of two epochs. GeoJournal 2000;51:351–60.http://search.proquest.com/docview/223677969?accountid=14511
56
Hodgkinson S, Watt P, Mooney G, editors. Critical Social Policy - Themed Section: Social Housing, Privatisation and Neoliberalism. ;33.http://csp.sagepub.com/content/33/1.toc
57
Ratcliffe P. Housing inequality and ‘race’: some critical reflections on the concept of ‘social exclusion’. Ethnic and Racial Studies 1999;22:1–22. doi:10.1080/014198799329576
58
Anderson I, Christian J. Causes of homelessness in the UK: a dynamic analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 2003;13:105–18. doi:10.1002/casp.714
59
Imrie R. Disability, embodiment and the meaning of the home. Housing Studies 2004;19:745–63. doi:10.1080/0267303042000249189
60
Malos E, Hague G. Women, housing, homelessness and domestic violence. Women’s Studies International Forum 1997;20:397–409. doi:10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00023-X
61
Means R. Safe as Houses? Ageing in Place and Vulnerable Older People in the UK. Social Policy & Administration 2007;41:65–85. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00539.x
62
Tomas A, Dittmar H. The experience of homeless women: An exploration of housing histories and the meaning of home. Housing Studies 1995;10:493–515. doi:10.1080/02673039508720834
63
Robinson D. New immigrants and migrants in social housing in Britain: discursive themes and lived realities. Policy & Politics 2010;38:57–77. doi:10.1332/030557309X458407
64
EARLE L. From Insurgent to Transgressive Citizenship: Housing, Social Movements and the Politics of Rights in São Paulo. Journal of Latin American Studies 2012;44:97–126. doi:10.1017/S0022216X11001118
65
Teppo A, Millstein M. The place of gentrification in Cape Town. In: Lees L, Shin HB, López Morales E, eds. Global gentrifications: uneven development and displacement. Bristol, England: : The Policy Press 2015. 419–40.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a8420035-af08-e711-80c9-005056af4099
66
Butcher S, Apsan Frediani A. Insurgent citizenship practices: The case of Muungano wa Wanavijiji in Nairobi, Kenya. City 2014;18:119–33. doi:10.1080/13604813.2014.896637
67
Cabannes Y, Guimarães Yafai S, Johnson C. How people face evictions. https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/publications/dpu-book-15/edit/dpu/latest/publications/dpu-books/How_people_face_evictions.pdf
68
G. C. A New Alliance for the City? Opportunities and Challenges of a (Globalizing) Right to the City Movement. In: Cities for all: Proposals and experiences towards the Right to the City. 2010. http://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/citiesalliance.org/files/Cities_For_All_ENG.pdf
69
Chatterjee P. Chapter 3: The politics of the governed. In: The politics of the governed: reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York: : Columbia University Press 2004.
70
Kothari M. The global struggle for the right to a place to live. Development in Practice 1997;7:5–16. doi:10.1080/09614529754710
71
Mathivet C. Take Back the Land! The Social Function of Land and Housing, Resistances and Alternatives. 2014.http://aitec.reseau-ipam.org/IMG/pdf/Pass10_Pages-EN-OKweb.pdf
72
N. SJ, L. Z, M.S. E MS. Moving toward the Implementation of the Right to the City in Latin America and Internationally. 2015.http://www.righttothecityplatform.org.br/download/publicacoes/00%20Reseach_moving%20toward%20the%20implementatio%20of%20the%20Right%20to%20the%20City%282%29.pdf
73
Habitat III Issue Papers 20 Housing. 2015.http://unhabitat.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Habitat-III-Issue-Paper-20_Housing-2.0.pdf
74
L. Z. The Right to the City: Struggles and proposals for the urban reform. In: Moksnes H, Melin M, eds. Claiming the City: Civil Society Mobilisation by the Urban Poor. 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-227423
75
Gaventa J, Cornwall A. Power and Knowledge. In: The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : : SAGE Publications Ltd 2008. 172–89. doi:10.4135/9781848607934.n17
76
Schon D. The structure of reflection in action. In: Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. Basic Books 2008. 128–67.https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=13d6a457-8b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
77
Brun C, Lund R. Real-time research: decolonising research practices – or just another spectacle of researcher–practitioner collaboration? Development in Practice 2010;20:812–26. doi:10.1080/09614524.2010.508107
78
Jupp E. Participation, local knowledge and empowerment: researching public space with young people. Environment and Planning A 2007;39:2832–44. doi:10.1068/a38204
79
Marshall J. Self-reflective Inquiry Practices. In: The handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. London: : SAGE 2001. 433–9.
80
Mauthner NS, Doucet A. Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis. Sociology 2003;37:413–31. doi:10.1177/00380385030373002
81
Sarkissian W, Hurford D. Chapter 8 – ‘Learning at the margins: Margo Fryer and Pamela Ponic on Deconstructing Power and Privilege’. In: Creative community planning: transformative engagement methods for working at the edge. London: : Earthscan 2010.
82
Strauss AL. Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511557842
83
Theis J, Grady H. Participatory Rapid Appraisal for Community Development. 1991.http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/8282IIED.pdf?
84
Turner JFC. Learning in time of paradigm change: The role of the professional. In: The challenge of sustainable cities: neoliberalism and urban strategies in developing countries. London: : Zed 1997. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=98c292a3-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
85
Wills J. Making Class Politics Possible: Organizing Contract Cleaners in London. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2008;32:305–23. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00783.x
86
Wills J. The geography of community and political organisation in London today. Political Geography 2012;31:114–26. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.11.003
87
McNiff J. Writing and presenting action research reports (pp144-158 in Part III: How do we share our knowledge?). In: Action Research: Principles and practice. Hoboken: : Taylor and Francis 2013. http://ucl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1143676
88
Desai V, Potter R. ‘Writing an Effective Research Report or Dissertation’ and ‘How is Research Communicated Professionally?’ In: Doing Development Research. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : : SAGE Publications, Ltd 2006. doi:10.4135/9781849208925
89
Clackman A. The PhotoVoice Manual. 2007.https://photovoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/PV_Manual.pdf
90
Clark-Ibáñez, Marisol. Framing the Social World With Photo-Elicitation Interviews. The American Behavioral Scientist;47:1507–27. doi:10.1177/0002764204266236
91
Holgate J, Keles J, Kumarappan L. Visualizing ‘community’: an experiment in participatory photography among Kurdish diasporic workers in London. The Sociological Review 2012;60:312–32. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02075.x
92
Orellana MF. Space and place in an Urban Landscape: Learning from children’s views of their social worlds. Visual Sociology 1999;14:73–89. doi:10.1080/14725869908583803
93
Fraley JM. Images of force: the power of maps in community development. Community Development Journal 2011;46:421–35. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsq011
94
Luttrell W, Chalfen R. Lifting up voices of participatory visual research. Visual Studies 2010;25:197–200. doi:10.1080/1472586X.2010.523270
95
Kaplan I, Miles S, Howes A. Images and the ethics of inclusion and exclusion: learning through participatory photography in education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs 2011;11:195–202. doi:10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01192.x
96
Tinkler P. A fragmented picture: reflections on the photographic practices of young people. Visual Studies 2008;23:255–66. doi:10.1080/14725860802489916
97
Meo A. Picturing Students’ Habitus: The Advantages and Limitations of Photo-Elicitation Interviewing in a Qualitative Study in the City of Buenos Aires. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 2010;9:149–71. doi:10.1177/160940691000900203
98
Joanou JP. The bad and the ugly: ethical concerns in participatory photographic methods with children living and working on the streets of Lima, Peru. Visual Studies 2009;24:214–23. doi:10.1080/14725860903309120
99
Piper H, Frankham J. Seeing Voices and Hearing Pictures: Image as discourse and the framing of image-based research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 2007;28:373–87. doi:10.1080/01596300701458954
100
Purcell R. Images for change: community development, community arts and photography. Community Development Journal 2007;44:111–22. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsm031
101
Woodley-Baker R. Private and public experience captured: young women capture their everyday lives and dreams through photo-narratives. Visual Studies 2009;24:19–35. doi:10.1080/14725860902732694
102
Avritzer L. Democratizing urban policy in Brazil: participation and the right to the city. In: Citizen action and national policy reform: making change happen. London: : Zed Books 2010.
103
Dunn C. A fresh breeze blows in Bahia. Americas 1994;46:28–37.https://search.proquest.com/docview/235254203?accountid=14511
104
Maricato E. Fighting for Just Cities in capitalism’s periphery. In: Searching for the just city: debates in urban theory and practice. London: : Routledge 2009. http://www.tandfebooks.com/isbn/9780203878835
105
Reiter B. The Limits of Popular Participation in Salvador, Brazil. Journal of Developing Societies 2008;24:337–54. doi:10.1177/0169796X0802400302
106
Rolnik R. Ten years of the City Statute in Brazil: from the struggle for urban reform to the World Cup cities. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development 2013;5:54–64. doi:10.1080/19463138.2013.782706
107
Elena Tarsi. Citizens’ participation in the urban regeneration of informal settlements: policy innovations and their limits in the Nova Constituinte neighborhood in the city of Salvador, Brazil.
108
Tarsi E. Chapter 17: Heritage tourism and displacement in Salvador da Bahia. In: Porter L, Shaw K, eds. Whose urban Renaissance? An international comparison of urban regeneration strategies. London ; New York: 2009. 164–79. doi:10.4324/9780203884539
109
Arnold, JensJalles, João. Dividing the Pie in Brazil: Income Distribution, Social Policies and the New Middle Class. OECD Economic Department Working Papershttp://search.proquest.com/docview/1491113444/E4863D1A05074F82PQ/1?accountid=14511
110
Burton G. An End to Poverty in Brazil? An Assessment of the Lula and Rousseff Governments’ Poverty Reduction and Elimination Strategies. Journal of Policy Practice 2013;12:194–215. doi:10.1080/15588742.2013.796203
111
Frediani AA. Amartya Sen, the World Bank, and the Redress of Urban Poverty: A Brazilian Case Study. Journal of Human Development 2007;8:133–52. doi:10.1080/14649880601101473
112
Moretto A. Brazil’s strategy against poverty: The Bolsa Familia and Brasil Sem Miséria. In: Fakier K, Ehmke E, eds. Socio-economic insecurity in emerging economies: building new spaces. London: : Routledge 2014.
113
Paes-Sousa R, Vaitsman J. The Zero Hunger and Brazil without Extreme Poverty programs: a step forward in Brazilian social protection policy. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 2014;19:4351–60. doi:10.1590/1413-812320141911.08812014
114
Pero V, Szerman D. The New Generation of Social Programs in Brazil. In: Adato M, Hoddinott J, eds. Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America. 2010. http://www.ifpri.org/publication/conditional-cash-transfers-latin-america
115
UN Habitat. Scaling-Up Affordable Housing Supply in Brazil: The ‘My House My Life’ Programme. 2013.http://unhabitat.org/scaling-up-affordable-housing-supply-in-brazil/
116
Baiocchi G. Radicals in power: the Workers’ Party (PT) and experiments in urban democracy. London: : Zed Books 2003.
117
Belda-Miquel S, Peris Blanes J, Frediani A. Institutionalization and Depoliticization of the Right to the City: Changing Scenarios for Radical Social Movements. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 2016;40:321–39. doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12382
118
De Carli B, Apsan A, Barbosa B, et al. Regeneration through the ‘Pedagogy of Confrontation’: Exploring the Critical Spatial Practices of Social Movements in Inner City São Paulo as Avenues for Urban Renewal. Dearq Revista de Arquitectura / Journal of Architecture 2015;:146–61. doi:10.18389/dearq16.2015.10
119
De Carli B, Frediani AA. Insurgent Regeneration: Spatial Practices of Citizenship in the Rehabilitation of Inner-City São Paulo. GeoHumanities 2016;2:331–53. doi:10.1080/2373566X.2016.1235984
120
Earle L. From Insurgent to Transgressive Citizenship: Housing, Social Movements and the Politics of Rights in São Paulo. 2012;44:97–126.https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9A1135F4DE695BDFF042EEC797C9DB7F/S0022216X11001118a.pdf/div-class-title-from-insurgent-to-transgressive-citizenship-housing-social-movements-and-the-politics-of-rights-in-sao-paulo-div.pdf
121
Jovchelovitch S, Priego-Hernández J. Underground sociabilities: identity, culture and resistance in Rio de Janeiro’s favelas. [Brasilia]: : UNESCO 2013. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/53678/1/Priego-Hernandez_2013_Underground_sociabilities.pdf
122
Keisha‐Khan YP. The roots of black resistance: race, gender and the struggle for urban land rights in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Social Identities 2004;10:811–31. doi:10.1080/1350463042000324283
123
KEISHA-KHAN Y. PERRY. Black Women against the Land Grab. University of Minnesota Press 5749. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt5hjjrr
124
King-Calnek JE. Education for Citizenship: Interethnic Pedagogy and Formal Education at Escola Criativa Olodum. The Urban Review 2006;38:145–64. doi:10.1007/s11256-006-0028-4
125
Della Porta D. Bridging research on democracy, social movements and communication. In: Cammaerts B, Mattoni A, McCurdy P, eds. Mediation and protest movements. Bristol, UK: : Intellect 2013. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1160345
126
Allen A, Lambert R, Apsan Frediani A, et al. Can participatory mapping activate spatial and political practices? Mapping popular resistance and dwelling practices in Bogotá eastern hills. Area 2015;47:261–71. doi:10.1111/area.12187
127
Campkin B, Duijzings G, editors. Engaged urbanism: cities & methodologies. London: : I.B. Tauris 2016.
128
Hodgson DL, Schroeder RA. Dilemmas of Counter-Mapping Community Resources in Tanzania. Development and Change 2002;33:79–100. doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00241
129
McFarlane C. Learning the City. Oxford, UK: : Wiley-Blackwell 2011. doi:10.1002/9781444343434
130
Milan S, editor. Social movements and their technologies: wiring social change. Basingstoke, Hampshire [etc.]: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
131
Gumucio Dagron A, Tufte T, Communication for Social Change Consortium. Communication for social change anthology: historical and contemporary readings. South Orange, N.J.: : Communication for Social Change Consortium 2006.
132
Rodgers S, Barnett C, Cochrane A. Media practices and urban politics: Conceptualizing the powers of the media-urban nexus. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2014;32:1054–70. doi:10.1068/d13157p
133
Fernandes E. Constructing the `Right To the City’ in Brazil. Social & Legal Studies 2007;16:201–19. doi:10.1177/0964663907076529
134
David Harvey. The Right to the City. New Left Review;53:21–40.https://newleftreview.org/II/53/david-harvey-the-right-to-the-city
135
Lefebvre H. Writings on cities. Malden, MA, USA: : Blackwell Publishing 1996.
136
Mathivet C, editor. Unveiling the Right to the City: Representations, Uses and Instrumentalization of the Right to the City. Published Online First: 2016.http://www.uclg-cisdp.org/en/news/latest-news/unveiling-right-city
137
Mayer M. The ‘right to the city’ in urban social movements. In: Brenner N, Marcuse P, Mayer M, eds. Cities for people not for profit: critical urban theory & the right to the city. 2012. 63–85.http://www.tandfebooks.com/doi/view/10.4324/9780203802182
138
Smith MP, McQuarrie M. Remaking urban citizenship: organizations, institutions, and the right to the city. New Brunswick, N.J.: : Transaction 2012.
139
Purcell M. Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal 2002;58:99–108. doi:10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f
