1.
Frediani AA, Monson T, Ossul Vermehren I. Campaigning through Images: Exploring Housing Rights in North London [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/programmes/postgraduate/msc-social-development-practice/in-practice/london-based-fieldwork/SDP_London_Report_2016
2.
Bradbury H. Introduction: how to Situate and Define Action Research. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research [Internet]. SAGE Publications; 2015. p. 1–9. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/reader.action?docID=2120425&ppg=46
3.
Belda S, Boni A, Peris J, Terol L. Rethinking capacity development for critical development practice. Inquiry into a postgraduate programme. Journal of International Development. 2012;24(5):571–584.
4.
Chambers R. Chapter 3: Professional Realities. Whose reality counts?: putting the first last. London: Intermediate Technology; 1997. p. 34–55.
5.
Clarke P, Oswald K. Introduction: Why Reflect Collectively on Capacities for Change? IDS Bulletin. 2010;41(3):1–12.
6.
Frediani AA, Monson T, Butcher S, editors. Reclaiming Regeneration: Negotiating a Citizens Charter for Euston Area [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/programmes/postgraduate/msc-social-development-practice/London-based-fieldwork/index/edit/2015_report_reclaiming_regeneration_Euston
7.
Frediani AA, Butcher S, Hirst L, editors. Regeneration Aspirations for Euston: Local Perspectives on High Speed Two Rail Link [Internet]. Available from: https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/programmes/postgraduate/msc-social-development-practice/in-practice/collaborations/regeneratoinaspirations
8.
Frediani AA, De Carli B, Nunez Ferrera I, N. Shinkins. Change by Design: New Spatial Imaginations for Los Pinos [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://issuu.com/beatricedecarli/docs/cbd2013_lp_report_en-download
9.
Kumar S. Conceptual specifications. Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners [Internet]. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing; 2002. p. 23–52. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c388f2bd-8836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
10.
Frediani AA. Sen’s Capability Approach as a framework to the practice of development. Development in Practice. 2010 Apr;20(2):173–187.
11.
Frediani AA. Amartya Sen, the World Bank, and the Redress of Urban Poverty: A Brazilian Case Study. Journal of Human Development. 2007 Mar;8(1):133–152.
12.
Ibrahim S. Introduction: The Capability Approach: From Theory to Practice — Rationale, Review and Reflections. In: Ibrahim S, Tiwari M, editors. The Capability Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2014. p. 1–28.
13.
Frediani AA, Hansen J. The Capability Approach in Development Planning and Urban Design [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.wholesem.ac.uk/bartlett/dpu/latest/publications/dpu-working-papers/WP_173-178_SPECIAL_ISSUE_ON_CAPABILITY_APPROACH_FINAL.pdf
14.
Frediani AA. ‘Participatory Capabilities’ in Development Practice [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/latest/publications/dpu-working-papers/WP178.pdf
15.
Frediani AA. An Agency-Oriented Exploration of Capabilities: Reflections from the UNDP 2010 Brasil Ponto a Ponto Campaign. In: Ibrahim S, Tiwari M, editors. The Capability Approach [Internet]. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK; 2014. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/9781137001436_5
16.
Frediani AA. Space and capabilities: approaching informal settlement upgrading through a capability perspective. In: Lemanski C, Marx C, editors. The city in urban poverty. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015.
17.
Bengtsson B. Housing as a Social Right: Implications for Welfare State Theory. Scandinavian Political Studies. 2001;24(4):255–275.
18.
Fitzpatrick S, Bengtsson B, Watts B. Rights to Housing: Reviewing the Terrain and Exploring a Way Forward. Housing, Theory and Society. 2014;31(4):447–463.
19.
KING P. Housing as a Freedom Right. Housing Studies. 2003;18(5):661–672.
20.
Rolnik R. (A/HRC/25/54/Add.2): Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Housing/Pages/CountryVisits.aspx
21.
Kothari M, Karmali S, Chaudhry S. The Human Right to Adequate Housing and Land [Internet]. New Delhi: National Human Rights Commission; 2006. Available from: http://www.rwi.lu.se/NHRIDB/Asia/India/Housing.pdf
22.
Rolnik R. Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing: Women and the right to housing [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Housing/A-HRC-19-53_en.pdf
23.
OHCHR. Fact Sheet No. 21, The Human Right to Adequate Housing [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.refworld.org/docid/479477400.html
24.
Luttrell W, Chalfen R. Lifting up voices of participatory visual research. Visual Studies. 2010;25(3):197–200.
25.
Purcell R. Images for change: community development, community arts and photography. Community Development Journal. 2007;44(1):111–122.
26.
Carlson ED, Engebretson J, Chamberlain RM. Photovoice as a Social Process of Critical Consciousness. Qualitative Health Research. 2006;16(6):836–852.
27.
Dodman DR. Shooting in the city: an autophotographic exploration of the urban environment in Kingston, Jamaica. Area. 2003;35(3):293–304.
28.
Holgate J, Keles J, Kumarappan L. Visualizing ‘community’: an experiment in participatory photography among Kurdish diasporic workers in London. The Sociological Review. 2012;60(2):312–332.
29.
Nykiforuk CIJ, Vallianatos H, Nieuwendyk LM. Photovoice as a Method for Revealing Community Perceptions of the Built and Social Environment. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 2011 Jun;10(2):103–124.
30.
PhotoVoice - Statement of Ethical Practice [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.photovoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/pvethicalpractice.pdf
31.
Packard J. ‘I’m gonna show you what it’s really like out here’: the power and limitation of participatory visual methods. Visual Studies. 2008;23(1):63–77.
32.
Prins E. Participatory photography: A tool for empowerment or surveillance? Action Research. 2010;8(4):426–443.
33.
Jennifer Thompson. Picturing gendered water spaces: A textual approach to water in rural Sierra Leone. Agenda [Internet]. Taylor & Francis Group; Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10130950.2011.575996
34.
Wang C, Burris MA. Empowerment through Photo Novella: Portraits of Participation. Health Education & Behavior. 1994 Jan 1;21(2):171–186.
35.
Wang CC. Youth Participation in Photovoice as a Strategy for Community Change. Journal of Community Practice. 2006 Jan;14(1–2):147–161.
36.
Life Through The Lens (Basti Ram, India) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bastiram.org/
37.
PhotoVoice (NGO facilitating projects in the UK and internationally) [Internet]. Available from: https://photovoice.org/projects/
38.
PhotoVoice practitioner resources: [Internet]. Available from: https://photovoice.org/resources/
39.
Participate Initiative [Internet]. Available from: https://participationpower.wordpress.com/2013/11/28/work-with-us-community-driven-research-inspiring-change/
40.
ODI Digital Stories & other examples [Internet]. Available from: https://www.odi.org/projects/2622-transforming-cash-transfers-beneficiary-and-community-perspectives-social-protection-programming
41.
Mayoux L. Quantitative, Qualitative or Participatory? Which Method, for What and When? Doing Development Research [Internet]. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2006. p. 115–129. Available from: http://methods.sagepub.com/book/doing-development-research/n13.xml
42.
Beazley H. Participatory Methods and Approaches: Tackling the Two Tyrannies. Doing Development Research [Internet]. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2006. p. 189–199. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849208925.n20
43.
Desai V, Potter R. Doing Development Research [Internet]. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2006. Available from: http://methods.sagepub.com/book/doing-development-research
44.
Kumar S. Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing; 2002.
45.
Theis J, Grady HM, International Institute for Environment and Development, Save the Children. Participatory rapid appraisal for community development: a training manual based on experiences in the Middle East and North Africa. London: International Institute for Environment and Development; 1991.
46.
Creswell JW. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications; 2014.
47.
Fisher S. Working with conflict: skills and strategies for action. London: Zed Books; 2000.
48.
Laws S, Harper C, Marcus R. Research for Development [Internet]. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2003. Available from: http://methods.sagepub.com/book/research-for-development
49.
Thomas A, Chataway J, Wuyts M. Finding out fast: investigative skills for policy and development. London: Sage Publications in association with the Open University; 1998.
50.
Methods for Development Work and Research: A New Guide for Practitioners [Internet]. B-42, Panchsheel Enclave, New Delhi 110 017 India : SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd; 2005. Available from: http://sk.sagepub.com/books/methods-for-development-work-and-research-2e
51.
Willis K. Interviewing. Doing Development Research [Internet]. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2006. p. 144–152. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849208925.n15
52.
Lloyd-Evans S. Focus Groups. Doing Development Research [Internet]. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2006. p. 153–162. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849208925.n16
53.
Simon D. Your Questions Answered? Conducting Questionnaire Surveys. Doing Development Research [Internet]. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2006. p. 163–171. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849208925.n17
54.
Mikkelsen B. Data Construction and Analysis of Qualitative Data. Methods for development work and research: a new guide for practitioners [Internet]. 2nd ed. New Delhi: SAGE; 2005. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9788132108566.n5
55.
Ian C, Barry G. Social Mix and the ‘Balanced Community’ in British housing policy - a tale of two epochs. GeoJournal [Internet]. 2000;51(4):351–360. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/223677969?accountid=14511
56.
Hodgkinson S, Watt P, Mooney G, editors. Critical Social Policy - Themed Section: Social Housing, Privatisation and Neoliberalism. 33. Available from: http://csp.sagepub.com/content/33/1.toc
57.
Ratcliffe P. Housing inequality and ‘race’: some critical reflections on the concept of ‘social exclusion’. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 1999;22(1):1–22.
58.
Anderson I, Christian J. Causes of homelessness in the UK: a dynamic analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 2003;13(2):105–118.
59.
Imrie R. Disability, embodiment and the meaning of the home. Housing Studies. 2004;19(5):745–763.
60.
Malos E, Hague G. Women, housing, homelessness and domestic violence. Women’s Studies International Forum. 1997;20(3):397–409.
61.
Means R. Safe as Houses? Ageing in Place and Vulnerable Older People in the UK. Social Policy & Administration. 2007;41(1):65–85.
62.
Tomas A, Dittmar H. The experience of homeless women: An exploration of housing histories and the meaning of home. Housing Studies. 1995;10(4):493–515.
63.
Robinson D. New immigrants and migrants in social housing in Britain: discursive themes and lived realities. Policy & Politics. 2010;38(1):57–77.
64.
EARLE L. From Insurgent to Transgressive Citizenship: Housing, Social Movements and the Politics of Rights in São Paulo. Journal of Latin American Studies. 2012;44(01):97–126.
65.
Teppo A, Millstein M. The place of gentrification in Cape Town. In: Lees L, Shin HB, López Morales E, editors. Global gentrifications: uneven development and displacement [Internet]. Bristol, England: The Policy Press; 2015. p. 419–440. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a8420035-af08-e711-80c9-005056af4099
66.
Butcher S, Apsan Frediani A. Insurgent citizenship practices: The case of Muungano wa Wanavijiji in Nairobi, Kenya. City. 2014 Mar 4;18(2):119–133.
67.
Cabannes Y, Guimarães Yafai S, Johnson C. How people face evictions [Internet]. Available from: https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/publications/dpu-book-15/edit/dpu/latest/publications/dpu-books/How_people_face_evictions.pdf
68.
G. C. A New Alliance for the City? Opportunities and Challenges of a (Globalizing) Right to the City Movement. Cities for all: Proposals and experiences towards the Right to the City [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.citiesalliance.org/sites/citiesalliance.org/files/Cities_For_All_ENG.pdf
69.
Chatterjee P. Chapter 3: The politics of the governed. The politics of the governed: reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York: Columbia University Press; 2004.
70.
Kothari M. The global struggle for the right to a place to live. Development in Practice. 1997;7(1):5–16.
71.
Mathivet C. Take Back the Land! The Social Function of Land and Housing, Resistances and Alternatives [Internet]. Mathivet C, editor. 2014. Available from: http://aitec.reseau-ipam.org/IMG/pdf/Pass10_Pages-EN-OKweb.pdf
72.
N. SJ, L. Z, M.S. E MS. Moving toward the Implementation of the Right to the City in Latin America and Internationally [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://www.righttothecityplatform.org.br/download/publicacoes/00%20Reseach_moving%20toward%20the%20implementatio%20of%20the%20Right%20to%20the%20City%282%29.pdf
73.
Habitat III Issue Papers 20 Housing [Internet]. 2015. Available from: http://unhabitat.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Habitat-III-Issue-Paper-20_Housing-2.0.pdf
74.
L. Z. The Right to the City: Struggles and proposals for the urban reform. In: Moksnes H, Melin M, editors. Claiming the City: Civil Society Mobilisation by the Urban Poor [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-227423
75.
Gaventa J, Cornwall A. Power and Knowledge. The SAGE Handbook of Action Research [Internet]. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : SAGE Publications Ltd; 2008. p. 172–189. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848607934.n17
76.
Schon D. The structure of reflection in action. Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action [Internet]. Basic Books; 2008. p. 128–167. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=13d6a457-8b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
77.
Brun C, Lund R. Real-time research: decolonising research practices – or just another spectacle of researcher–practitioner collaboration? Development in Practice. 2010;20(7):812–826.
78.
Jupp E. Participation, local knowledge and empowerment: researching public space with young people. Environment and Planning A. 2007;39(12):2832–2844.
79.
Marshall J. Self-reflective Inquiry Practices. The handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. London: SAGE; 2001. p. 433–439.
80.
Mauthner NS, Doucet A. Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis. Sociology. 2003;37(3):413–431.
81.
Sarkissian W, Hurford D. Chapter 8 – ‘Learning at the margins: Margo Fryer and Pamela Ponic on Deconstructing Power and Privilege’. Creative community planning: transformative engagement methods for working at the edge. London: Earthscan; 2010.
82.
Strauss AL. Qualitative analysis for social scientists [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987. Available from: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511557842
83.
Theis J, Grady H. Participatory Rapid Appraisal for Community Development [Internet]. 1991. Available from: http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/8282IIED.pdf?
84.
Turner JFC. Learning in time of paradigm change: The role of the professional. The challenge of sustainable cities: neoliberalism and urban strategies in developing countries [Internet]. London: Zed; 1997. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=98c292a3-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
85.
Wills J. Making Class Politics Possible: Organizing Contract Cleaners in London. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2008;32(2):305–323.
86.
Wills J. The geography of community and political organisation in London today. Political Geography. 2012;31(2):114–126.
87.
McNiff J. Writing and presenting action research reports (pp144-158 in Part III: How do we share our knowledge?). Action Research: Principles and practice [Internet]. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis; 2013. Available from: http://ucl.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1143676
88.
Desai V, Potter R. ‘Writing an Effective Research Report or Dissertation’ and ‘How is Research Communicated Professionally?’ Doing Development Research [Internet]. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom : SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2006. Available from: http://methods.sagepub.com/book/doing-development-research
89.
Clackman A. The PhotoVoice Manual [Internet]. 2007. Available from: https://photovoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/PV_Manual.pdf
90.
Clark-Ibáñez, Marisol. Framing the Social World With Photo-Elicitation Interviews. The American Behavioral Scientist [Internet]. 47(12):1507–1527. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/214761767/fulltextPDF/7BAFCE1083E942E7PQ/1?accountid=14511
91.
Holgate J, Keles J, Kumarappan L. Visualizing ‘community’: an experiment in participatory photography among Kurdish diasporic workers in London. The Sociological Review. 2012;60(2):312–332.
92.
Orellana MF. Space and place in an Urban Landscape: Learning from children’s views of their social worlds. Visual Sociology. 1999 Jan;14(1):73–89.
93.
Fraley JM. Images of force: the power of maps in community development. Community Development Journal. 2011 Oct 1;46(4):421–435.
94.
Luttrell W, Chalfen R. Lifting up voices of participatory visual research. Visual Studies. 2010;25(3):197–200.
95.
Kaplan I, Miles S, Howes A. Images and the ethics of inclusion and exclusion: learning through participatory photography in education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 2011 Nov;11(3):195–202.
96.
Tinkler P. A fragmented picture: reflections on the photographic practices of young people. Visual Studies. 2008 Dec;23(3):255–266.
97.
Meo A. Picturing Students’ Habitus: The Advantages and Limitations of Photo-Elicitation Interviewing in a Qualitative Study in the City of Buenos Aires. International Journal of Qualitative Methods [Internet]. SAGE Publications; 2010 Jun 1;9(2):149–171. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/160940691000900203
98.
Joanou JP. The bad and the ugly: ethical concerns in participatory photographic methods with children living and working on the streets of Lima, Peru. Visual Studies. 2009 Nov 18;24(3):214–223.
99.
Piper H, Frankham J. Seeing Voices and Hearing Pictures: Image as discourse and the framing of image-based research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 2007 Sep;28(3):373–387.
100.
Purcell R. Images for change: community development, community arts and photography. Community Development Journal. 2007;44(1):111–122.
101.
Woodley-Baker R. Private and public experience captured: young women capture their everyday lives and dreams through photo-narratives. Visual Studies. 2009 Mar 19;24(1):19–35.
102.
Avritzer L. Democratizing urban policy in Brazil: participation and the right to the city. Citizen action and national policy reform: making change happen. London: Zed Books; 2010.
103.
Dunn C. A fresh breeze blows in Bahia. Americas [Internet]. Washington: Organization of American States, Sales and Promotion Division; 1994;46(3):28–37. Available from: https://search.proquest.com/docview/235254203?accountid=14511
104.
Maricato E. Fighting for Just Cities in capitalism’s periphery. Searching for the just city: debates in urban theory and practice [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2009. Available from: http://www.tandfebooks.com/isbn/9780203878835
105.
Reiter B. The Limits of Popular Participation in Salvador, Brazil. Journal of Developing Societies. 2008 Sep;24(3):337–354.
106.
Rolnik R. Ten years of the City Statute in Brazil: from the struggle for urban reform to the World Cup cities. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development. 2013 May;5(1):54–64.
107.
Elena Tarsi. Citizens’ participation in the urban regeneration of informal settlements: policy innovations and their limits in the Nova Constituinte neighborhood in the city of Salvador, Brazil.
108.
Tarsi E. Chapter 17: Heritage tourism and displacement in Salvador da Bahia. In: Porter L, Shaw K, editors. Whose urban Renaissance? An international comparison of urban regeneration strategies [Internet]. London ; New York; 2009. p. 164–179. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780203884539/startPage/34
109.
Arnold, JensJalles, João. Dividing the Pie in Brazil: Income Distribution, Social Policies and the New Middle Class. OECD Economic Department Working Papers [Internet]. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD); (1105). Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1491113444/E4863D1A05074F82PQ/1?accountid=14511
110.
Burton G. An End to Poverty in Brazil? An Assessment of the Lula and Rousseff Governments’ Poverty Reduction and Elimination Strategies. Journal of Policy Practice. 2013 Jul;12(3):194–215.
111.
Frediani AA. Amartya Sen, the World Bank, and the Redress of Urban Poverty: A Brazilian Case Study. Journal of Human Development. 2007 Mar;8(1):133–152.
112.
Moretto A. Brazil’s strategy against poverty: The Bolsa Familia and Brasil Sem Miséria. In: Fakier K, Ehmke E, editors. Socio-economic insecurity in emerging economies: building new spaces. London: Routledge; 2014.
113.
Paes-Sousa R, Vaitsman J. The Zero Hunger and Brazil without Extreme Poverty programs: a step forward in Brazilian social protection policy. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2014 Nov;19(11):4351–4360.
114.
Pero V, Szerman D. The New Generation of Social Programs in Brazil. In: Adato M, Hoddinott J, editors. Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.ifpri.org/publication/conditional-cash-transfers-latin-america
115.
UN Habitat. Scaling-Up Affordable Housing Supply in Brazil: The ‘My House My Life’ Programme [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://unhabitat.org/scaling-up-affordable-housing-supply-in-brazil/
116.
Baiocchi G. Radicals in power: the Workers’ Party (PT) and experiments in urban democracy. London: Zed Books; 2003.
117.
Belda-Miquel S, Peris Blanes J, Frediani A. Institutionalization and Depoliticization of the Right to the City: Changing Scenarios for Radical Social Movements. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2016 Mar;40(2):321–339.
118.
De Carli B, Apsan A, Barbosa B, Comarú F, de Sousa R. Regeneration through the ‘Pedagogy of Confrontation’: Exploring the Critical Spatial Practices of Social Movements in Inner City São Paulo as Avenues for Urban Renewal. Dearq Revista de Arquitectura / Journal of Architecture. 2015 Jul 1;(16):146–161.
119.
De Carli B, Frediani AA. Insurgent Regeneration: Spatial Practices of Citizenship in the Rehabilitation of Inner-City São Paulo. GeoHumanities. 2016 Jul 2;2(2):331–353.
120.
Earle L. From Insurgent to Transgressive Citizenship: Housing, Social Movements and the Politics of Rights in São Paulo [Internet]. Journal of Latin American Studies; 2012. p. 97–126. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9A1135F4DE695BDFF042EEC797C9DB7F/S0022216X11001118a.pdf/div-class-title-from-insurgent-to-transgressive-citizenship-housing-social-movements-and-the-politics-of-rights-in-sao-paulo-div.pdf
121.
Jovchelovitch S, Priego-Hernández J. Underground sociabilities: identity, culture and resistance in Rio de Janeiro’s favelas [Internet]. [Brasilia]: UNESCO; 2013. Available from: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/53678/1/Priego-Hernandez_2013_Underground_sociabilities.pdf
122.
Keisha‐Khan YP. The roots of black resistance: race, gender and the struggle for urban land rights in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Social Identities. 2004 Nov;10(6):811–831.
123.
KEISHA-KHAN Y. PERRY. Black Women against the Land Grab [Internet]. University of Minnesota Press; 5749. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctt5hjjrr
124.
King-Calnek JE. Education for Citizenship: Interethnic Pedagogy and Formal Education at Escola Criativa Olodum. The Urban Review. 2006 Jun;38(2):145–164.
125.
Della Porta D. Bridging research on democracy, social movements and communication. In: Cammaerts B, Mattoni A, McCurdy P, editors. Mediation and protest movements [Internet]. Bristol, UK: Intellect; 2013. Available from: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1160345
126.
Allen A, Lambert R, Apsan Frediani A, Ome T. Can participatory mapping activate spatial and political practices? Mapping popular resistance and dwelling practices in Bogotá eastern hills. Area. 2015 Sep;47(3):261–271.
127.
Campkin B, Duijzings G, editors. Engaged urbanism: cities & methodologies. London: I.B. Tauris; 2016.
128.
Hodgson DL, Schroeder RA. Dilemmas of Counter-Mapping Community Resources in Tanzania. Development and Change. 2002 Jan;33(1):79–100.
129.
McFarlane C. Learning the City [Internet]. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2011. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/9781444343434
130.
Milan S, editor. Social movements and their technologies: wiring social change. Basingstoke, Hampshire [etc.]: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.
131.
Gumucio Dagron A, Tufte T, Communication for Social Change Consortium. Communication for social change anthology: historical and contemporary readings. South Orange, N.J.: Communication for Social Change Consortium; 2006.
132.
Rodgers S, Barnett C, Cochrane A. Media practices and urban politics: Conceptualizing the powers of the media-urban nexus. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2014;32(6):1054–1070.
133.
Fernandes E. Constructing the `Right To the City’ in Brazil. Social & Legal Studies. 2007 Jun 1;16(2):201–219.
134.
David Harvey. The Right to the City. New Left Review [Internet]. London: New Left Review; 53:21–40. Available from: https://newleftreview.org/II/53/david-harvey-the-right-to-the-city
135.
Lefebvre H. Writings on cities. Kofman E, Lebas E, editors. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell Publishing; 1996.
136.
Mathivet C, editor. Unveiling the Right to the City: Representations, Uses and Instrumentalization of the Right to the City. 2016; Available from: http://www.uclg-cisdp.org/en/news/latest-news/unveiling-right-city
137.
Mayer M. The ‘right to the city’ in urban social movements. In: Brenner N, Marcuse P, Mayer M, editors. Cities for people not for profit: critical urban theory & the right to the city [Internet]. 2012. p. 63–85. Available from: http://www.tandfebooks.com/doi/view/10.4324/9780203802182
138.
Smith MP, McQuarrie M. Remaking urban citizenship: organizations, institutions, and the right to the city. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction; 2012.
139.
Purcell M. Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal. 2002;58(2/3):99–108.
