1.
Frediani, A.A., Monson, T., Ossul Vermehren, I.: Campaigning through Images: Exploring Housing Rights in North London, https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/programmes/postgraduate/msc-social-development-practice/in-practice/london-based-fieldwork/SDP_London_Report_2016, (2016).
2.
Bradbury, H.: Introduction: how to Situate and Define Action Research. In: The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. pp. 1–9. SAGE Publications (2015).
3.
Belda, S., Boni, A., Peris, J., Terol, L.: Rethinking capacity development for critical development practice. Inquiry into a postgraduate programme. Journal of International Development. 24, 571–584 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.2850.
4.
Chambers, R.: Chapter 3: Professional Realities. In: Whose reality counts?: putting the first last. pp. 34–55. Intermediate Technology, London (1997).
5.
Clarke, P., Oswald, K.: Introduction: Why Reflect Collectively on Capacities for Change? IDS Bulletin. 41, 1–12 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2010.00132.x.
6.
Frediani, A.A., Monson, T., Butcher, S. eds: Reclaiming Regeneration: Negotiating a Citizens Charter for Euston Area, https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/programmes/postgraduate/msc-social-development-practice/London-based-fieldwork/index/edit/2015_report_reclaiming_regeneration_Euston, (2015).
7.
Frediani, A.A., Butcher, S., Hirst, L. eds: Regeneration Aspirations for Euston: Local Perspectives on High Speed Two Rail Link, https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/programmes/postgraduate/msc-social-development-practice/in-practice/collaborations/regeneratoinaspirations.
8.
Frediani, A.A., De Carli, B., Nunez Ferrera, I., N. Shinkins: Change by Design: New Spatial Imaginations for Los Pinos, https://issuu.com/beatricedecarli/docs/cbd2013_lp_report_en-download, (2013).
9.
Kumar, S.: Conceptual specifications. In: Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. pp. 23–52. Practical Action Publishing, Rugby (2002).
10.
Frediani, A.A.: Sen’s Capability Approach as a framework to the practice of development. Development in Practice. 20, 173–187 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520903564181.
11.
Frediani, A.A.: Amartya Sen, the World Bank, and the Redress of Urban Poverty: A Brazilian Case Study. Journal of Human Development. 8, 133–152 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880601101473.
12.
Ibrahim, S.: Introduction: The Capability Approach: From Theory to Practice — Rationale, Review and Reflections. In: Ibrahim, S. and Tiwari, M. (eds.) The Capability Approach. pp. 1–28. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137001436_1.
13.
Frediani, A.A., Hansen, J.: The Capability Approach in Development Planning and Urban Design, http://www.wholesem.ac.uk/bartlett/dpu/latest/publications/dpu-working-papers/WP_173-178_SPECIAL_ISSUE_ON_CAPABILITY_APPROACH_FINAL.pdf, (2015).
14.
Frediani, A.A.: ‘Participatory Capabilities’ in Development Practice, https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/latest/publications/dpu-working-papers/WP178.pdf, (2015).
15.
Frediani, A.A.: An Agency-Oriented Exploration of Capabilities: Reflections from the UNDP 2010 Brasil Ponto a Ponto Campaign. In: Ibrahim, S. and Tiwari, M. (eds.) The Capability Approach. Palgrave Macmillan UK, London (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137001436.
16.
Frediani, A.A.: Space and capabilities: approaching informal settlement upgrading through a capability perspective. In: Lemanski, C. and Marx, C. (eds.) The city in urban poverty. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2015).
17.
Bengtsson, B.: Housing as a Social Right: Implications for Welfare State Theory. Scandinavian Political Studies. 24, 255–275 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9477.00056.
18.
Fitzpatrick, S., Bengtsson, B., Watts, B.: Rights to Housing: Reviewing the Terrain and Exploring a Way Forward. Housing, Theory and Society. 31, 447–463 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2014.923506.
19.
KING, P.: Housing as a Freedom Right. Housing Studies. 18, 661–672 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/02673030304259.
20.
Rolnik, R.: (A/HRC/25/54/Add.2): Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing as a component of the right to an adequate standard of living, and on the right to non-discrimination in this context, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Housing/Pages/CountryVisits.aspx, (2014).
21.
Kothari, M., Karmali, S., Chaudhry, S.: The Human Right to Adequate Housing and Land, http://www.rwi.lu.se/NHRIDB/Asia/India/Housing.pdf, (2006).
22.
Rolnik, R.: Report of the Special Rapporteur on adequate housing: Women and the right to housing, http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Housing/A-HRC-19-53_en.pdf, (2011).
23.
OHCHR: Fact Sheet No. 21, The Human Right to Adequate Housing, http://www.refworld.org/docid/479477400.html, (2009).
24.
Luttrell, W., Chalfen, R.: Lifting up voices of participatory visual research. Visual Studies. 25, 197–200 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2010.523270.
25.
Purcell, R.: Images for change: community development, community arts and photography. Community Development Journal. 44, 111–122 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsm031.
26.
Carlson, E.D., Engebretson, J., Chamberlain, R.M.: Photovoice as a Social Process of Critical Consciousness. Qualitative Health Research. 16, 836–852 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732306287525.
27.
Dodman, D.R.: Shooting in the city: an autophotographic exploration of the urban environment in Kingston, Jamaica. Area. 35, 293–304 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4762.00178.
28.
Holgate, J., Keles, J., Kumarappan, L.: Visualizing ‘community’: an experiment in participatory photography among Kurdish diasporic workers in London. The Sociological Review. 60, 312–332 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02075.x.
29.
Nykiforuk, C.I.J., Vallianatos, H., Nieuwendyk, L.M.: Photovoice as a Method for Revealing Community Perceptions of the Built and Social Environment. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 10, 103–124 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691101000201.
30.
PhotoVoice - Statement of Ethical Practice, http://www.photovoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/pvethicalpractice.pdf, (2009).
31.
Packard, J.: ‘I’m gonna show you what it’s really like out here’: the power and limitation of participatory visual methods. Visual Studies. 23, 63–77 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860801908544.
32.
Prins, E.: Participatory photography: A tool for empowerment or surveillance? Action Research. 8, 426–443 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750310374502.
33.
Jennifer  Thompson: Picturing gendered water spaces: A textual approach to water in rural Sierra Leone. Agenda.
34.
Wang, C., Burris, M.A.: Empowerment through Photo Novella: Portraits of Participation. Health Education & Behavior. 21, 171–186 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819402100204.
35.
Wang, C.C.: Youth Participation in Photovoice as a Strategy for Community Change. Journal of Community Practice. 14, 147–161 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n01_09.
36.
Life Through The Lens (Basti Ram, India), http://www.bastiram.org/.
37.
PhotoVoice (NGO facilitating projects in the UK and internationally), https://photovoice.org/projects/.
38.
PhotoVoice practitioner resources:, https://photovoice.org/resources/.
39.
Participate Initiative, https://participationpower.wordpress.com/2013/11/28/work-with-us-community-driven-research-inspiring-change/.
40.
ODI Digital Stories & other examples, https://www.odi.org/projects/2622-transforming-cash-transfers-beneficiary-and-community-perspectives-social-protection-programming.
41.
Mayoux, L.: Quantitative, Qualitative or Participatory? Which Method, for What and When? In: Doing Development Research. pp. 115–129. SAGE Publications, Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom  (2006). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208925.n13.
42.
Beazley, H.: Participatory Methods and Approaches: Tackling the Two Tyrannies. In: Doing Development Research. pp. 189–199. SAGE Publications, Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom  (2006). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208925.n20.
43.
Desai, V., Potter, R.: Doing Development Research. SAGE Publications, Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom  (2006). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208925.
44.
Kumar, S.: Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. Practical Action Publishing, Rugby (2002).
45.
Theis, J., Grady, H.M., International Institute for Environment and Development, Save the Children: Participatory rapid appraisal for community development: a training manual based on experiences in the Middle East and North Africa. International Institute for Environment and Development, London (1991).
46.
Creswell, J.W.: Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2014).
47.
Fisher, S.: Working with conflict: skills and strategies for action. Zed Books, London (2000).
48.
Laws, S., Harper, C., Marcus, R.: Research for Development. SAGE Publications, Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom  (2003). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209786.
49.
Thomas, A., Chataway, J., Wuyts, M.: Finding out fast: investigative skills for policy and development. Sage Publications in association with the Open University, London (1998).
50.
Methods for Development Work and Research: A New Guide for Practitioners. SAGE Publications India Pvt Ltd, B-42, Panchsheel Enclave,  New Delhi    110 017  India  (2005). https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132108566.
51.
Willis, K.: Interviewing. In: Doing Development Research. pp. 144–152. SAGE Publications, Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom  (2006). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208925.n15.
52.
Lloyd-Evans, S.: Focus Groups. In: Doing Development Research. pp. 153–162. SAGE Publications, Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom  (2006). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208925.n16.
53.
Simon, D.: Your Questions Answered? Conducting Questionnaire Surveys. In: Doing Development Research. pp. 163–171. SAGE Publications, Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom  (2006). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208925.n17.
54.
Mikkelsen, B.: Data Construction and Analysis of Qualitative Data. In: Methods for development work and research: a new guide for practitioners. SAGE, New Delhi (2005). https://doi.org/10.4135/9788132108566.n5.
55.
Ian, C., Barry, G.: Social Mix and the ‘Balanced Community’ in British housing policy - a tale of two epochs. GeoJournal. 51, 351–360 (2000).
56.
Hodgkinson, S., Watt, P., Mooney, G. eds: Critical Social Policy - Themed Section: Social Housing, Privatisation and Neoliberalism. 33,.
57.
Ratcliffe, P.: Housing inequality and ‘race’: some critical reflections on the concept of ‘social exclusion’. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 22, 1–22 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/014198799329576.
58.
Anderson, I., Christian, J.: Causes of homelessness in the UK: a dynamic analysis. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology. 13, 105–118 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.714.
59.
Imrie, R.: Disability, embodiment and the meaning of the home. Housing Studies. 19, 745–763 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/0267303042000249189.
60.
Malos, E., Hague, G.: Women, housing, homelessness and domestic violence. Women’s Studies International Forum. 20, 397–409 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(97)00023-X.
61.
Means, R.: Safe as Houses? Ageing in Place and Vulnerable Older People in the UK. Social Policy & Administration. 41, 65–85 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00539.x.
62.
Tomas, A., Dittmar, H.: The experience of homeless women: An exploration of housing histories and the meaning of home. Housing Studies. 10, 493–515 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039508720834.
63.
Robinson, D.: New immigrants and migrants in social housing in Britain: discursive themes and lived realities. Policy & Politics. 38, 57–77 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1332/030557309X458407.
64.
EARLE, L.: From Insurgent to Transgressive Citizenship: Housing, Social Movements and the Politics of Rights in São Paulo. Journal of Latin American Studies. 44, 97–126 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X11001118.
65.
Teppo, A., Millstein, M.: The place of gentrification in Cape Town. In: Lees, L., Shin, H.B., and López Morales, E. (eds.) Global gentrifications: uneven development and displacement. pp. 419–440. The Policy Press, Bristol, England (2015).
66.
Butcher, S., Apsan Frediani, A.: Insurgent citizenship practices: The case of Muungano wa Wanavijiji in Nairobi, Kenya. City. 18, 119–133 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2014.896637.
67.
Cabannes, Y., Guimarães Yafai, S., Johnson, C.: How people face evictions, https://www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/publications/dpu-book-15/edit/dpu/latest/publications/dpu-books/How_people_face_evictions.pdf.
68.
G., C.: A New Alliance for the City? Opportunities and Challenges of a (Globalizing) Right to the City Movement. In: Cities for all: Proposals and experiences towards the Right to the City (2010).
69.
Chatterjee, P.: Chapter 3: The politics of the governed. In: The politics of the governed: reflections on popular politics in most of the world. Columbia University Press, New York (2004).
70.
Kothari, M.: The global struggle for the right to a place to live. Development in Practice. 7, 5–16 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/09614529754710.
71.
Mathivet, C.: Take Back the Land! The Social Function of Land and Housing, Resistances and Alternatives, http://aitec.reseau-ipam.org/IMG/pdf/Pass10_Pages-EN-OKweb.pdf, (2014).
72.
N., S.J., L., Z., M.S., E., M.S.: Moving toward the Implementation of the Right to the City in Latin America and Internationally, http://www.righttothecityplatform.org.br/download/publicacoes/00%20Reseach_moving%20toward%20the%20implementatio%20of%20the%20Right%20to%20the%20City%282%29.pdf, (2015).
73.
Habitat III Issue Papers 20 Housing, http://unhabitat.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Habitat-III-Issue-Paper-20_Housing-2.0.pdf, (2015).
74.
L., Z.: The Right to the City: Struggles and proposals for the urban reform. In: Moksnes, H. and Melin, M. (eds.) Claiming the City: Civil Society Mobilisation by the Urban Poor (2014).
75.
Gaventa, J., Cornwall, A.: Power and Knowledge. In: The SAGE Handbook of Action Research. pp. 172–189. SAGE Publications Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom  (2008). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607934.n17.
76.
Schon, D.: The structure of reflection in action. In: Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. pp. 128–167. Basic Books (2008).
77.
Brun, C., Lund, R.: Real-time research: decolonising research practices – or just another spectacle of researcher–practitioner collaboration? Development in Practice. 20, 812–826 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/09614524.2010.508107.
78.
Jupp, E.: Participation, local knowledge and empowerment: researching public space with young people. Environment and Planning A. 39, 2832–2844 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1068/a38204.
79.
Marshall, J.: Self-reflective Inquiry Practices. In: The handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. pp. 433–439. SAGE, London (2001).
80.
Mauthner, N.S., Doucet, A.: Reflexive Accounts and Accounts of Reflexivity in Qualitative Data Analysis. Sociology. 37, 413–431 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/00380385030373002.
81.
Sarkissian, W., Hurford, D.: Chapter 8 – ‘Learning at the margins: Margo Fryer and Pamela Ponic on Deconstructing Power and Privilege’. In: Creative community planning: transformative engagement methods for working at the edge. Earthscan, London (2010).
82.
Strauss, A.L.: Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511557842.
83.
Theis, J., Grady, H.: Participatory Rapid Appraisal for Community Development, http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/8282IIED.pdf?, (1991).
84.
Turner, J.F.C.: Learning in time of paradigm change: The role of the professional. In: The challenge of sustainable cities: neoliberalism and urban strategies in developing countries. Zed, London (1997).
85.
Wills, J.: Making Class Politics Possible: Organizing Contract Cleaners in London. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 32, 305–323 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00783.x.
86.
Wills, J.: The geography of community and political organisation in London today. Political Geography. 31, 114–126 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2011.11.003.
87.
McNiff, J.: Writing and presenting action research reports (pp144-158 in Part III: How do we share our knowledge?). In: Action Research: Principles and practice. Taylor and Francis, Hoboken (2013).
88.
Desai, V., Potter, R.: ‘Writing an Effective Research Report or Dissertation’ and ‘How is Research Communicated Professionally?’ In: Doing Development Research. SAGE Publications, Ltd, 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road, London England EC1Y 1SP United Kingdom  (2006). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849208925.
89.
Clackman, A.: The PhotoVoice Manual, https://photovoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/PV_Manual.pdf, (2007).
90.
Clark-Ibáñez, Marisol: Framing the Social World With Photo-Elicitation Interviews. The American Behavioral Scientist. 47, 1507–1527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764204266236.
91.
Holgate, J., Keles, J., Kumarappan, L.: Visualizing ‘community’: an experiment in participatory photography among Kurdish diasporic workers in London. The Sociological Review. 60, 312–332 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02075.x.
92.
Orellana, M.F.: Space and place in an Urban Landscape: Learning from children’s views of their social worlds. Visual Sociology. 14, 73–89 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1080/14725869908583803.
93.
Fraley, J.M.: Images of force: the power of maps in community development. Community Development Journal. 46, 421–435 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsq011.
94.
Luttrell, W., Chalfen, R.: Lifting up voices of participatory visual research. Visual Studies. 25, 197–200 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2010.523270.
95.
Kaplan, I., Miles, S., Howes, A.: Images and the ethics of inclusion and exclusion: learning through participatory photography in education. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs. 11, 195–202 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01192.x.
96.
Tinkler, P.: A fragmented picture: reflections on the photographic practices of young people. Visual Studies. 23, 255–266 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860802489916.
97.
Meo, A.: Picturing Students’ Habitus: The Advantages and Limitations of Photo-Elicitation Interviewing in a Qualitative Study in the City of Buenos Aires. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 9, 149–171 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691000900203.
98.
Joanou, J.P.: The bad and the ugly: ethical concerns in participatory photographic methods with children living and working on the streets of Lima, Peru. Visual Studies. 24, 214–223 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860903309120.
99.
Piper, H., Frankham, J.: Seeing Voices and Hearing Pictures: Image as discourse and the framing of image-based research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 28, 373–387 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300701458954.
100.
Purcell, R.: Images for change: community development, community arts and photography. Community Development Journal. 44, 111–122 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsm031.
101.
Woodley-Baker, R.: Private and public experience captured: young women capture their everyday lives and dreams through photo-narratives. Visual Studies. 24, 19–35 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860902732694.
102.
Avritzer, L.: Democratizing urban policy in Brazil: participation and the right to the city. In: Citizen action and national policy reform: making change happen. Zed Books, London (2010).
103.
Dunn, C.: A fresh breeze blows in Bahia. Americas. 46, 28–37 (1994).
104.
Maricato, E.: Fighting for Just Cities in capitalism’s periphery. In: Searching for the just city: debates in urban theory and practice. Routledge, London (2009).
105.
Reiter, B.: The Limits of Popular Participation in Salvador, Brazil. Journal of Developing Societies. 24, 337–354 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796X0802400302.
106.
Rolnik, R.: Ten years of the City Statute in Brazil: from the struggle for urban reform to the World Cup cities. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development. 5, 54–64 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/19463138.2013.782706.
107.
Elena Tarsi: Citizens’ participation in the urban regeneration of informal settlements: policy innovations and their limits in the Nova Constituinte neighborhood in the city of Salvador, Brazil.
108.
Tarsi, E.: Chapter 17: Heritage tourism and displacement in Salvador da Bahia. In: Porter, L. and Shaw, K. (eds.) Whose urban Renaissance? An international comparison of urban regeneration strategies. pp. 164–179. , London ; New York (2009). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203884539.
109.
Arnold, JensJalles, João: Dividing the Pie in Brazil: Income Distribution, Social Policies and the New Middle Class. OECD Economic Department Working Papers.
110.
Burton, G.: An End to Poverty in Brazil? An Assessment of the Lula and Rousseff Governments’ Poverty Reduction and Elimination Strategies. Journal of Policy Practice. 12, 194–215 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/15588742.2013.796203.
111.
Frediani, A.A.: Amartya Sen, the World Bank, and the Redress of Urban Poverty: A Brazilian Case Study. Journal of Human Development. 8, 133–152 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880601101473.
112.
Moretto, A.: Brazil’s strategy against poverty: The Bolsa Familia and Brasil Sem Miséria. In: Fakier, K. and Ehmke, E. (eds.) Socio-economic insecurity in emerging economies: building new spaces. Routledge, London (2014).
113.
Paes-Sousa, R., Vaitsman, J.: The Zero Hunger and Brazil without Extreme Poverty programs: a step forward in Brazilian social protection policy. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 19, 4351–4360 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-812320141911.08812014.
114.
Pero, V., Szerman, D.: The New Generation of Social Programs in Brazil. In: Adato, M. and Hoddinott, J. (eds.) Conditional Cash Transfers in Latin America (2010).
115.
UN Habitat: Scaling-Up Affordable Housing Supply in Brazil: The ‘My House My Life’ Programme, http://unhabitat.org/scaling-up-affordable-housing-supply-in-brazil/.
116.
Baiocchi, G.: Radicals in power: the Workers’ Party (PT) and experiments in urban democracy. Zed Books, London (2003).
117.
Belda-Miquel, S., Peris Blanes, J., Frediani, A.: Institutionalization and Depoliticization of the Right to the City: Changing Scenarios for Radical Social Movements. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 40, 321–339 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12382.
118.
De Carli, B., Apsan, A., Barbosa, B., Comarú, F., de Sousa, R.: Regeneration through the ‘Pedagogy of Confrontation’: Exploring the Critical Spatial Practices of Social Movements in Inner City São Paulo as Avenues for Urban Renewal. Dearq Revista de Arquitectura / Journal of Architecture. 146–161 (2015). https://doi.org/10.18389/dearq16.2015.10.
119.
De Carli, B., Frediani, A.A.: Insurgent Regeneration: Spatial Practices of Citizenship in the Rehabilitation of Inner-City São Paulo. GeoHumanities. 2, 331–353 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2016.1235984.
120.
Earle, L.: From Insurgent to Transgressive Citizenship: Housing, Social Movements and the Politics of Rights in São Paulo, https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/9A1135F4DE695BDFF042EEC797C9DB7F/S0022216X11001118a.pdf/div-class-title-from-insurgent-to-transgressive-citizenship-housing-social-movements-and-the-politics-of-rights-in-sao-paulo-div.pdf, (2012).
121.
Jovchelovitch, S., Priego-Hernández, J.: Underground sociabilities: identity, culture and resistance in Rio de Janeiro’s favelas. UNESCO, [Brasilia] (2013).
122.
Keisha‐Khan, Y.P.: The roots of black resistance: race, gender and the struggle for urban land rights in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Social Identities. 10, 811–831 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/1350463042000324283.
123.
KEISHA-KHAN Y. PERRY: Black Women against the Land Grab. University of Minnesota Press (5749).
124.
King-Calnek, J.E.: Education for Citizenship: Interethnic Pedagogy and Formal Education at Escola Criativa Olodum. The Urban Review. 38, 145–164 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11256-006-0028-4.
125.
Della Porta, D.: Bridging research on democracy, social movements and communication. In: Cammaerts, B., Mattoni, A., and McCurdy, P. (eds.) Mediation and protest movements. Intellect, Bristol, UK (2013).
126.
Allen, A., Lambert, R., Apsan Frediani, A., Ome, T.: Can participatory mapping activate spatial and political practices? Mapping popular resistance and dwelling practices in Bogotá eastern hills. Area. 47, 261–271 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12187.
127.
Campkin, B., Duijzings, G. eds: Engaged urbanism: cities & methodologies. I.B. Tauris, London (2016).
128.
Hodgson, D.L., Schroeder, R.A.: Dilemmas of Counter-Mapping Community Resources in Tanzania. Development and Change. 33, 79–100 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00241.
129.
McFarlane, C.: Learning the City. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444343434.
130.
Milan, S. ed: Social movements and their technologies: wiring social change. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire [etc.] (2013).
131.
Gumucio Dagron, A., Tufte, T., Communication for Social Change Consortium: Communication for social change anthology: historical and contemporary readings. Communication for Social Change Consortium, South Orange, N.J. (2006).
132.
Rodgers, S., Barnett, C., Cochrane, A.: Media practices and urban politics: Conceptualizing the powers of the media-urban nexus. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 32, 1054–1070 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1068/d13157p.
133.
Fernandes, E.: Constructing the `Right To the City’ in Brazil. Social & Legal Studies. 16, 201–219 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663907076529.
134.
David Harvey: The Right to the City. New Left Review. 53, 21–40.
135.
Lefebvre, H.: Writings on cities. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, USA (1996).
136.
Mathivet, C. ed: Unveiling the Right to the City: Representations, Uses and Instrumentalization of the Right to the City. (2016).
137.
Mayer, M.: The ‘right to the city’ in urban social movements. In: Brenner, N., Marcuse, P., and Mayer, M. (eds.) Cities for people not for profit: critical urban theory & the right to the city. pp. 63–85 (2012).
138.
Smith, M.P., McQuarrie, M.: Remaking urban citizenship: organizations, institutions, and the right to the city. Transaction, New Brunswick, N.J. (2012).
139.
Purcell, M.: Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal. 58, 99–108 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010829.62237.8f.