1
What makes good research. 23 AD.
2
Maxfield MG, Babbie ER. Basics of research methods for criminal justice and criminology. Fourth edition, Student edition. Australia: Cengage Learning 2016.
3
Haworth B, Bruce E, Iveson K. Spatio-temporal analysis of graffiti occurrence in an inner-city urban environment. Applied Geography. 2013;38:53–63. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.10.002
4
Taylor M, Marais I. Does Urban Art Deter Graffiti Proliferation? http://www.britsoccrim.org/volume9/wholedoc09.pdf#page=61
5
Graffiti- A crime or art? 2012.
6
Braga A. Understanding the Nature of Urban Gun Violence Problems. 28 AD.
7
Ekblom P, Hirschfield A. Developing an alternative formulation of SCP principles – the Ds (11 and counting). Crime Science. 2014;3. doi: 10.1186/s40163-014-0002-5
8
Sokal A. Alan Sokal: Sense About Science annyal lecture.
9
Kelling G, Wilson J. Broken Windows - The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/
10
Maxfield MG, Babbie ER. Basics of research methods for criminal justice and criminology. Fourth edition, Student edition. Australia: Cengage Learning 2016.
11
Tompson L, Belur J. Information retrieval in systematic reviews: a case study of the crime prevention literature. Journal of Experimental Criminology. Published Online First: 5 September 2015. doi: 10.1007/s11292-015-9243-x
12
Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews.
13
K. Balagopal. People’s War and the Government: Did the Police Have the Last Laugh? Economic and Political Weekly. 2003;38:513–9.
14
Gilbert GN. Researching social life. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage 2008.
15
Mason J. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage 2002.
16
British Crime Survey: methodology. 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/british-crime-survey-methodology
17
TURANOVIC JJ, RODRIGUEZ N, PRATT TC. THE COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF INCARCERATION REVISITED: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS ON CAREGIVERS OF CHILDREN OF INCARCERATED PARENTS*. Criminology. 2012;50:913–59. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00283.x
18
Crime Survey for England and Wales 2011-2012. https://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk/catalogue/?sn=7252&type=Data%20catalogue#documentation
19
George R. Tourist’s perceptions of safety and security while visiting Cape Town. Tourism Management. 2003;24:575–85. doi: 10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00003-7
20
Introduction to Cognitive Bias. https://lecturecast.ucl.ac.uk/ess/echo/presentation/c30accef-afbd-4553-ba34-895e99ee06ba
21
Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin Company 1966.
22
Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin 2002.
23
Harré R. Great scientific experiments: twenty experiments that changed our view of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press 1983.
24
Campbell DT, Russo MJ. Social experimentation. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage 1999.
25
Collins HM, Pinch TJ. The Golem: What You Should Know About Science. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2012.
26
Collins HM, Pinch TJ. The Golem at large: what you should know about technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002.
27
Collins HM, Pinch TJ. Dr. Golem: how to think about medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press 2005.
28
Taylor B, Koper C, Woods D. Combating Vehicle Theft in Arizona: A Randomized Experiment With License Plate Recognition Technology. Criminal Justice Review. 2012;37:24–50. doi: 10.1177/0734016811425858
29
RATCLIFFE JH, TANIGUCHI T, GROFF ER, et al. THE PHILADELPHIA FOOT PATROL EXPERIMENT: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF POLICE PATROL EFFECTIVENESS IN VIOLENT CRIME HOTSPOTS*. Criminology. 2011;49:795–831. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00240.x
30
Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment. 2015.
31
The Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment Website. http://www.cla.temple.edu/cj/center-for-security-and-crime-science/the-philadelphia-foot-patrol-experiment/
32
Chainey S. Repeat Victimisation - JDiBrief. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/jdibrief/analysis/repeat_victimisation
33
Johnson S, Davies T. Space-time pattern analysis. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/jdibrief/analysis/space-time-pattern-analysis
34
Johnson SD, Summers L, Pease K. Offender as Forager? A Direct Test of the Boost Account of Victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 2009;25:181–200. doi: 10.1007/s10940-008-9060-8
35
Jupp V, Tilley N. Doing realistic evaluation of criminal justice from: Doing Criminological Research. 2000.
36
Armitage R. An Evaluation of Secured by Design Housing in West Yorkshire.
37
Cartwright N, Hardie J. Evidence-based policy: a practical guide to doing it better. Oxford: Oxford University Press 2012.
38
Pawson R. Realistic evaluation bloodlines. The American Journal of Evaluation. 2001;22:317–24. doi: 10.1016/S1098-2140(01)00141-2
39
Sherman LW, National Institute of Justice (U.S.), University of Maryland at College Park. Dept. of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Preventing crime: what works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. [Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs 1997.
40
Tilley N. Experimentation and Criminal Justice Policies in the United Kingdom. Crime & Delinquency. 2000;46:194–213. doi: 10.1177/0011128700046002004
41
Tilley N. Demonstration, Exemplification, Duplication and Replication in Evaluation Research. Evaluation. 1996;2:35–50. doi: 10.1177/135638909600200104
42
Knutsson J, Tilley N. Evaluating crime reduction initiatives. Monsey, N.Y.: Criminal Justice 2009.
43
Agent-Based Models. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks California 91320 United States of America : SAGE Publications, Inc. 2008.
44
Hill J, Borrion H, Johnson S. Potential uses of computer agent-based simulation modeling in the evaluation of wildlife poaching. Situational prevention of poaching. London: Routledge 2014.
45
BIRKS D, TOWNSLEY M, STEWART A. GENERATIVE EXPLANATIONS OF CRIME: USING SIMULATION TO TEST CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORY*. Criminology. 2012;50:221–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00258.x
46
NetLogo 5.3.1 User Manual. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/docs/
