1.
What makes good research [Internet]. 23 AD. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLMNL08WOoo
2.
Maxfield MG, Babbie ER. Basics of research methods for criminal justice and criminology [Internet]. Fourth edition, Student edition. Australia: Cengage Learning; 2016. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781473737617
3.
Haworth B, Bruce E, Iveson K. Spatio-temporal analysis of graffiti occurrence in an inner-city urban environment. Applied Geography. 2013 Mar;38:53–63.
4.
Taylor M, Marais I. Does Urban Art Deter Graffiti Proliferation? [Internet]. Available from: http://www.britsoccrim.org/volume9/wholedoc09.pdf#page=61
5.
Graffiti- A crime or art? [Internet]. 2012. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvNkuCZuYdA
6.
Braga A. Understanding the Nature of Urban Gun Violence Problems [Internet]. 28 AD. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2FDd_5uro8&feature=youtu.be
7.
Ekblom P, Hirschfield A. Developing an alternative formulation of SCP principles – the Ds (11 and counting). Crime Science. 2014 Dec;3(1).
8.
Sokal A. Alan Sokal: Sense About Science annyal lecture [Internet]. Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/science/audio/2008/mar/03/alan.sokal.podcast
9.
Kelling G, Wilson J. Broken Windows - The Atlantic [Internet]. Available from: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/
10.
Maxfield MG, Babbie ER. Basics of research methods for criminal justice and criminology [Internet]. Fourth edition, Student edition. Australia: Cengage Learning; 2016. Available from: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781473737617
11.
Tompson L, Belur J. Information retrieval in systematic reviews: a case study of the crime prevention literature. Journal of Experimental Criminology. 2015 Sept 5;
12.
Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews [Internet]. Available from: https://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=y1sCcjIZnA0C&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=+Introducing+systematic+reviews.+In+D.+Gough,+S.+Oliver,+%26+J.+Thomas&ots=wP88Vl-MFJ&sig=cdDgWrWG2PkGwD3v4MVRQEgicIg#v=onepage&q=Introducing%20systematic%20reviews.%20In%20D.%20Gough%2C%20S.%20Oliver%2C%20%26%20J.%20Thomas&f=false
13.
K. Balagopal. People’s War and the Government: Did the Police Have the Last Laugh? Economic and Political Weekly [Internet]. 2003;38(6):513–519. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4413183?origin=JSTOR-pdf&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
14.
Gilbert GN. Researching social life. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage; 2008.
15.
Mason J. Qualitative researching. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2002.
16.
British Crime Survey: methodology [Internet]. Home Office; 2012. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/british-crime-survey-methodology
17.
TURANOVIC JJ, RODRIGUEZ N, PRATT TC. THE COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF INCARCERATION REVISITED: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS ON CAREGIVERS OF CHILDREN OF INCARCERATED PARENTS*. Criminology. 2012 Nov;50(4):913–959.
18.
Crime Survey for England and Wales 2011-2012 [Internet]. Available from: https://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk/catalogue/?sn=7252&type=Data%20catalogue#documentation
19.
George R. Tourist’s perceptions of safety and security while visiting Cape Town. Tourism Management. 2003 Oct;24(5):575–585.
20.
Introduction to Cognitive Bias [Internet]. Available from: https://lecturecast.ucl.ac.uk/ess/echo/presentation/c30accef-afbd-4553-ba34-895e99ee06ba
21.
Campbell DT, Stanley JC. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1966.
22.
Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 2002.
23.
Harré R. Great scientific experiments: twenty experiments that changed our view of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1983.
24.
Campbell DT, Russo MJ. Social experimentation. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1999.
25.
Collins HM, Pinch TJ. The Golem: What You Should Know About Science [Internet]. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295612
26.
Collins HM, Pinch TJ. The Golem at large: what you should know about technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
27.
Collins HM, Pinch TJ. Dr. Golem: how to think about medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2005.
28.
Taylor B, Koper C, Woods D. Combating Vehicle Theft in Arizona: A Randomized Experiment With License Plate Recognition Technology. Criminal Justice Review. 2012 Mar 1;37(1):24–50.
29.
RATCLIFFE JH, TANIGUCHI T, GROFF ER, WOOD JD. THE PHILADELPHIA FOOT PATROL EXPERIMENT: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF POLICE PATROL EFFECTIVENESS IN VIOLENT CRIME HOTSPOTS*. Criminology. 2011 Aug;49(3):795–831.
30.
Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment [Internet]. 2015. Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NUQsK0vnnM
31.
The Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment Website [Internet]. Available from: http://www.cla.temple.edu/cj/center-for-security-and-crime-science/the-philadelphia-foot-patrol-experiment/
32.
Chainey S. Repeat Victimisation - JDiBrief [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/jdibrief/analysis/repeat_victimisation
33.
Johnson S, Davies T. Space-time pattern analysis [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/jdibrief/analysis/space-time-pattern-analysis
34.
Johnson SD, Summers L, Pease K. Offender as Forager? A Direct Test of the Boost Account of Victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 2009 June;25(2):181–200.
35.
Jupp V, Tilley N. Doing realistic evaluation of criminal justice from: Doing Criminological Research. 2000. Available from: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/doing-criminological-research/d72.xml
36.
Armitage R. An Evaluation of Secured by Design Housing in West Yorkshire. Available from: http://www.popcenter.org/library/scp/pdf/04-Armitage.pdf
37.
Cartwright N, Hardie J. Evidence-based policy: a practical guide to doing it better. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012.
38.
Pawson R. Realistic evaluation bloodlines. The American Journal of Evaluation. 2001;22(3):317–324.
39.
Sherman LW, National Institute of Justice (U.S.), University of Maryland at College Park. Dept. of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Preventing crime: what works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. [Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs; 1997.
40.
Tilley N. Experimentation and Criminal Justice Policies in the United Kingdom. Crime & Delinquency. 2000 Apr 1;46(2):194–213.
41.
Tilley N. Demonstration, Exemplification, Duplication and Replication in Evaluation Research. Evaluation. 1996 Jan 1;2(1):35–50.
42.
Knutsson J, Tilley N. Evaluating crime reduction initiatives. Monsey, N.Y.: Criminal Justice; 2009.
43.
Agent-Based Models [Internet]. 2455 Teller Road,  Thousand Oaks  California  91320  United States of America : SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2008. Available from: http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/agent-based-models/SAGE.xml
44.
Hill J, Borrion H, Johnson S. Potential uses of computer agent-based simulation modeling in the evaluation of wildlife poaching. Situational prevention of poaching. London: Routledge; 2014.
45.
BIRKS D, TOWNSLEY M, STEWART A. GENERATIVE EXPLANATIONS OF CRIME: USING SIMULATION TO TEST CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORY*. Criminology. 2012 Feb;50(1):221–254.
46.
NetLogo 5.3.1 User Manual [Internet]. Available from: http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/docs/