1.
What makes good research, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NLMNL08WOoo, (23) AD.
2.
Maxfield, M.G., Babbie, E.R.: Basics of research methods for criminal justice and criminology. Cengage Learning, Australia (2016).
3.
Haworth, B., Bruce, E., Iveson, K.: Spatio-temporal analysis of graffiti occurrence in an inner-city urban environment. Applied Geography. 38, 53–63 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2012.10.002.
4.
Taylor, M., Marais, I.: Does Urban Art Deter Graffiti Proliferation?, http://www.britsoccrim.org/volume9/wholedoc09.pdf#page=61.
5.
Graffiti- A crime or art?, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JvNkuCZuYdA, (2012).
6.
Braga, A.: Understanding the Nature of Urban Gun Violence Problems, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2FDd_5uro8&feature=youtu.be, (28) AD.
7.
Ekblom, P., Hirschfield, A.: Developing an alternative formulation of SCP principles – the Ds (11 and counting). Crime Science. 3, (2014). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-014-0002-5.
8.
Sokal, A.: Alan Sokal: Sense About Science annyal lecture, http://www.theguardian.com/science/audio/2008/mar/03/alan.sokal.podcast.
9.
Kelling, G., Wilson, J.: Broken Windows - The Atlantic, http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/.
10.
Maxfield, M.G., Babbie, E.R.: Basics of research methods for criminal justice and criminology. Cengage Learning, Australia (2016).
11.
Tompson, L., Belur, J.: Information retrieval in systematic reviews: a case study of the crime prevention literature. Journal of Experimental Criminology. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9243-x.
12.
Gough, D., Oliver, S., Thomas, J.: An Introduction to Systematic Reviews.
13.
K. Balagopal: People’s War and the Government: Did the Police Have the Last Laugh? Economic and Political Weekly. 38, 513–519 (2003).
14.
Gilbert, G.N.: Researching social life. Sage, Los Angeles (2008).
15.
Mason, J.: Qualitative researching. Sage, London (2002).
16.
British Crime Survey: methodology, https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/british-crime-survey-methodology.
17.
TURANOVIC, J.J., RODRIGUEZ, N., PRATT, T.C.: THE COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF INCARCERATION REVISITED: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS ON CAREGIVERS OF CHILDREN OF INCARCERATED PARENTS*. Criminology. 50, 913–959 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00283.x.
18.
Crime Survey for England and Wales 2011-2012, https://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk/catalogue/?sn=7252&type=Data%20catalogue#documentation.
19.
George, R.: Tourist’s perceptions of safety and security while visiting Cape Town. Tourism Management. 24, 575–585 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00003-7.
20.
Introduction to Cognitive Bias, https://lecturecast.ucl.ac.uk/ess/echo/presentation/c30accef-afbd-4553-ba34-895e99ee06ba.
21.
Campbell, D.T., Stanley, J.C.: Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Mass (1966).
22.
Shadish, W.R., Cook, T.D., Campbell, D.T.: Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (2002).
23.
Harré, R.: Great scientific experiments: twenty experiments that changed our view of the world. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1983).
24.
Campbell, D.T., Russo, M.J.: Social experimentation. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif (1999).
25.
Collins, H.M., Pinch, T.J.: The Golem: What You Should Know About Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
26.
Collins, H.M., Pinch, T.J.: The Golem at large: what you should know about technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002).
27.
Collins, H.M., Pinch, T.J.: Dr. Golem: how to think about medicine. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2005).
28.
Taylor, B., Koper, C., Woods, D.: Combating Vehicle Theft in Arizona: A Randomized Experiment With License Plate Recognition Technology. Criminal Justice Review. 37, 24–50 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016811425858.
29.
RATCLIFFE, J.H., TANIGUCHI, T., GROFF, E.R., WOOD, J.D.: THE PHILADELPHIA FOOT PATROL EXPERIMENT: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF POLICE PATROL EFFECTIVENESS IN VIOLENT CRIME HOTSPOTS*. Criminology. 49, 795–831 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00240.x.
30.
Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0NUQsK0vnnM, (2015).
31.
The Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment Website, http://www.cla.temple.edu/cj/center-for-security-and-crime-science/the-philadelphia-foot-patrol-experiment/.
32.
Chainey, S.: Repeat Victimisation - JDiBrief, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/jdibrief/analysis/repeat_victimisation.
33.
Johnson, S., Davies, T.: Space-time pattern analysis, http://www.ucl.ac.uk/jdibrief/analysis/space-time-pattern-analysis.
34.
Johnson, S.D., Summers, L., Pease, K.: Offender as Forager? A Direct Test of the Boost Account of Victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology. 25, 181–200 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-008-9060-8.
35.
Jupp, V., Tilley, N.: Doing realistic evaluation of criminal justice from: Doing Criminological Research. Presented at the (2000).
36.
Armitage, R.: An Evaluation of Secured by Design Housing in West Yorkshire.
37.
Cartwright, N., Hardie, J.: Evidence-based policy: a practical guide to doing it better. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
38.
Pawson, R.: Realistic evaluation bloodlines. The American Journal of Evaluation. 22, 317–324 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(01)00141-2.
39.
Sherman, L.W., National Institute of Justice (U.S.), University of Maryland at College Park. Dept. of Criminology and Criminal Justice: Preventing crime: what works, what doesn’t, what’s promising. U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, [Washington, DC (1997).
40.
Tilley, N.: Experimentation and Criminal Justice Policies in the United Kingdom. Crime & Delinquency. 46, 194–213 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128700046002004.
41.
Tilley, N.: Demonstration, Exemplification, Duplication and Replication in Evaluation Research. Evaluation. 2, 35–50 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1177/135638909600200104.
42.
Knutsson, J., Tilley, N.: Evaluating crime reduction initiatives. Criminal Justice, Monsey, N.Y. (2009).
43.
Agent-Based Models. SAGE Publications, Inc., 2455 Teller Road,  Thousand Oaks  California  91320  United States of America  (2008). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412983259.
44.
Hill, J., Borrion, H., Johnson, S.: Potential uses of computer agent-based simulation modeling in the evaluation of wildlife poaching. In: Situational prevention of poaching. Routledge, London (2014).
45.
BIRKS, D., TOWNSLEY, M., STEWART, A.: GENERATIVE EXPLANATIONS OF CRIME: USING SIMULATION TO TEST CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORY*. Criminology. 50, 221–254 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00258.x.
46.
NetLogo 5.3.1 User Manual, http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/docs/.