1.
What makes good research. (23 AD).
2.
Maxfield, M. G. & Babbie, E. R. Basics of Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology. (Cengage Learning, Australia, 2016).
3.
Haworth, B., Bruce, E. & Iveson, K. Spatio-temporal analysis of graffiti occurrence in an inner-city urban environment. Applied Geography 38, 53–63 (2013).
4.
Taylor, M. & Marais, I. Does Urban Art Deter Graffiti Proliferation? http://www.britsoccrim.org/volume9/wholedoc09.pdf#page=61.
5.
Graffiti- A crime or art? (2012).
6.
Braga, A. Understanding the Nature of Urban Gun Violence Problems. (28 AD).
7.
Ekblom, P. & Hirschfield, A. Developing an alternative formulation of SCP principles – the Ds (11 and counting). Crime Science 3, (2014).
8.
Sokal, A. Alan Sokal: Sense About Science annyal lecture.
9.
Kelling, G. & Wilson, J. Broken Windows - The Atlantic. http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/.
10.
Maxfield, M. G. & Babbie, E. R. Basics of Research Methods for Criminal Justice and Criminology. (Cengage Learning, Australia, 2016).
11.
Tompson, L. & Belur, J. Information retrieval in systematic reviews: a case study of the crime prevention literature. Journal of Experimental Criminology (2015) doi:10.1007/s11292-015-9243-x.
12.
Gough, D., Oliver, S. & Thomas, J. An Introduction to Systematic Reviews.
13.
K. Balagopal. People’s War and the Government: Did the Police Have the Last Laugh? Economic and Political Weekly 38, 513–519 (2003).
14.
Gilbert, G. N. Researching Social Life. (Sage, Los Angeles, 2008).
15.
Mason, J. Qualitative Researching. (Sage, London, 2002).
16.
British Crime Survey: methodology. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/british-crime-survey-methodology (2012).
17.
TURANOVIC, J. J., RODRIGUEZ, N. & PRATT, T. C. THE COLLATERAL CONSEQUENCES OF INCARCERATION REVISITED: A QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECTS ON CAREGIVERS OF CHILDREN OF INCARCERATED PARENTS*. Criminology 50, 913–959 (2012).
18.
Crime Survey for England and Wales 2011-2012. https://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk/catalogue/?sn=7252&type=Data%20catalogue#documentation.
19.
George, R. Tourist’s perceptions of safety and security while visiting Cape Town. Tourism Management 24, 575–585 (2003).
20.
Introduction to Cognitive Bias. https://lecturecast.ucl.ac.uk/ess/echo/presentation/c30accef-afbd-4553-ba34-895e99ee06ba.
21.
Campbell, D. T. & Stanley, J. C. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. (Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, Mass, 1966).
22.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D. & Campbell, D. T. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. (Houghton Mifflin, Boston, 2002).
23.
Harré, R. Great Scientific Experiments: Twenty Experiments That Changed Our View of the World. vol. Oxford paperbacks (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983).
24.
Campbell, D. T. & Russo, M. J. Social Experimentation. vol. Sage classics series (Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif, 1999).
25.
Collins, H. M. & Pinch, T. J. The Golem: What You Should Know About Science. vol. Canto Classics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012).
26.
Collins, H. M. & Pinch, T. J. The Golem at Large: What You Should Know about Technology. vol. Canto (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002).
27.
Collins, H. M. & Pinch, T. J. Dr. Golem: How to Think about Medicine. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2005).
28.
Taylor, B., Koper, C. & Woods, D. Combating Vehicle Theft in Arizona: A Randomized Experiment With License Plate Recognition Technology. Criminal Justice Review 37, 24–50 (2012).
29.
RATCLIFFE, J. H., TANIGUCHI, T., GROFF, E. R. & WOOD, J. D. THE PHILADELPHIA FOOT PATROL EXPERIMENT: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF POLICE PATROL EFFECTIVENESS IN VIOLENT CRIME HOTSPOTS*. Criminology 49, 795–831 (2011).
30.
Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment. (2015).
31.
The Philadelphia Foot Patrol Experiment Website. http://www.cla.temple.edu/cj/center-for-security-and-crime-science/the-philadelphia-foot-patrol-experiment/.
32.
Chainey, S. Repeat Victimisation - JDiBrief. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/jdibrief/analysis/repeat_victimisation.
33.
Johnson, S. & Davies, T. Space-time pattern analysis. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/jdibrief/analysis/space-time-pattern-analysis.
34.
Johnson, S. D., Summers, L. & Pease, K. Offender as Forager? A Direct Test of the Boost Account of Victimization. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 25, 181–200 (2009).
35.
Jupp, V. & Tilley, N. Doing realistic evaluation of criminal justice from: Doing Criminological Research. in (2000).
36.
Armitage, R. An Evaluation of Secured by Design Housing in West Yorkshire.
37.
Cartwright, N. & Hardie, J. Evidence-Based Policy: A Practical Guide to Doing It Better. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012).
38.
Pawson, R. Realistic evaluation bloodlines. The American Journal of Evaluation 22, 317–324 (2001).
39.
Sherman, L. W., National Institute of Justice (U.S.), & University of Maryland at College Park. Dept. of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Preventing Crime: What Works, What Doesn’t, What’s Promising. (U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, [Washington, DC, 1997).
40.
Tilley, N. Experimentation and Criminal Justice Policies in the United Kingdom. Crime & Delinquency 46, 194–213 (2000).
41.
Tilley, N. Demonstration, Exemplification, Duplication and Replication in Evaluation Research. Evaluation 2, 35–50 (1996).
42.
Knutsson, J. & Tilley, N. Evaluating Crime Reduction Initiatives. vol. Crime prevention studies (Criminal Justice, Monsey, N.Y., 2009).
43.
Agent-Based Models. (SAGE Publications, Inc., 2455 Teller Road,  Thousand Oaks  California  91320  United States of America , 2008). doi:10.4135/9781412983259.
44.
Hill, J., Borrion, H. & Johnson, S. Potential uses of computer agent-based simulation modeling in the evaluation of wildlife poaching. in Situational prevention of poaching vol. Crime science series (Routledge, London, 2014).
45.
BIRKS, D., TOWNSLEY, M. & STEWART, A. GENERATIVE EXPLANATIONS OF CRIME: USING SIMULATION TO TEST CRIMINOLOGICAL THEORY*. Criminology 50, 221–254 (2012).
46.
NetLogo 5.3.1 User Manual. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/docs/.