[1]
A. Cuthbert, ‘Chapter  6:  Urban Design and Spatial Political Economy’, in Companion to Urban Design, Routledge, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203844434
[2]
D. Martin, E. McCann, and M. Purcell, ‘Space, Scale, Governance, and Representation: Contemporary Geographical Perspectives on Urban Politics and Policy’, Journal of Urban Affairs, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 113–121, 2003, doi: 10.1111/1467-9906.t01-1-00001.
[3]
H. Sanoff, ‘Multiple views of participatory design’, International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.archnet-ijar.net/index.php/IJAR/article/view/177
[4]
V. Watson, ‘Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues’, Urban Studies, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 2259–2275, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1177/0042098009342598.
[5]
S. Schindler, ‘Towards a paradigm of Southern urbanism’, City, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 47–64, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/13604813.2016.1263494.
[6]
J. Barry et al., ‘Unsettling planning theory’, Planning Theory, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 418–438, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1177/1473095218763842.
[7]
Doreen Massey, ‘Politics and Space/Time’, New Left Review, vol. 196, 1992 [Online]. Available: https://newleftreview.org/I/196/doreen-massey-politics-and-space-time
[8]
M. Rios, ‘Envisioning Citizenship: Toward a Polity Approach in Urban Design’, Journal of Urban Design, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 213–229, 2008, doi: 10.1080/13574800801965692.
[9]
A. Roy, ‘Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory?’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 200–209, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12274.
[10]
C. McFarlane, ‘Knowledge, learning and development: a post-rationalist approach’, Progress in Development Studies, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 287–305, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1464993406ps144oa.
[11]
A. Cornwall, ‘Historical perspectives on participation in development’, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 62–83, 2006, doi: 10.1080/14662040600624460.
[12]
A. Escobar, ‘The making and the unmaking of the third world through development’, in The post-development reader, London: Zed Books, 1996 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=92a6b119-10d2-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[13]
S. Hickey and G. Mohan, ‘Towards Participation as Transformation: Critical Themes and Challenges’, in Participation: from tyranny to transformation? : exploring new approaches to participation in development, London: Zed, 2004, pp. 3–24 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=1893885c-8336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[14]
D. Mitlin, ‘With and beyond the state -- co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations’, Environment and Urbanization, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 339–360, Oct. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0956247808096117.
[15]
J. Rendell, ‘Only resist: Five particular qualities might characterise a specifically feminist approach to critical spatial practice, suggests Jane Rendell.’, Architectural Review, vol. 243, no. 1449, pp. 8–18, 2018 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=asu&AN=128870014&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[16]
F. Miraftab, ‘Making neo-liberal governance: the disempowering work of empowerment’, International Planning Studies, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 239–259, 2004, doi: 10.1080/13563470500050130.
[17]
K. D. Derickson, ‘On the politics of recognition in critical urban scholarship’, Urban Geography, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 824–829, Aug. 2016, doi: 10.1080/02723638.2015.1105483.
[18]
C. Irazábal, ‘Public, Private, People Partnerships (PPPPs): Reflections from Latin American Cases’, in Private communities and urban governance: theoretical and comparative perspectives, A. Lehavi, Ed. Switzerland: Springer, 2016, pp. 191–214 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1224661&site=ehost-live&scope=site
[19]
J. Gaventa and G. Barrett, ‘So What Difference Does it Make? Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement’, IDS Working Papers, vol. 2010, no. 347, pp. 01–72, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00347_2.x.
[20]
A. Roy, ‘Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai’, Antipode, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 159–179, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00660.x.
[21]
Catalina Ortiz and Camillo Boano, ‘The Medellín’s shifting geopolitics of informality : The Encircled Garden as a dispositive of civil disenfranchisement?’, pp. 189–207 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781317333562/chapters/10.4324%2F9781315659275-16
[22]
P. Marcuse, ‘From critical urban theory to the right to the city’, City, vol. 13, no. 2–3, pp. 185–197, 2009, doi: 10.1080/13604810902982177.
[23]
X. Sun and R. Huang, ‘Spatial meaning-making and urban activism: Two tales of anti-PX protests in urban China’, Journal of Urban Affairs, pp. 1–21, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1080/07352166.2018.1443010.
[24]
R. Rolnik, ‘Place, inhabitance and citizenship: the right to housing and the right to the city in the contemporary urban world’, International Journal of Housing Policy, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 293–300, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1080/14616718.2014.936178.
[25]
B. Bell and K. Wakeford, Expanding architecture: design as activism. New York: Metropolis Books, 2008.
[26]
F. Miraftab, ‘Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship: The Story of Western Cape Anti-eviction Campaign in South Africa’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 200–217, 2005, doi: 10.1177/0739456X05282182.
[27]
T. Winkler, ‘Black texts on white paper: Learning to                              resistant texts as an approach towards decolonising planning’, Planning Theory, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1177/1473095217739335.
[28]
H. Al-Harithy, ‘The participative discourse: community activism in post-war reconstruction.’, in Urban design in the Arab world: reconceptualizing boundaries, vol. Design and the built environment series, R. Saliba, Ed. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate, 2015, pp. 39–50 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3d19f9c2-7c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[29]
G. Carabelli, ‘Grassroots Movements and the Production of (Other) Space(s) - published in The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar’, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018 [Online]. Available: http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3192314340004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
[30]
A. Erfan, ‘Confronting collective traumas: an exploration of therapeutic planning’, Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 34–50, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1080/14649357.2016.1249909.
[31]
M. Fawaz, ‘Hezbollah as Urban Planner? Questions To and From Planning Theory’, Planning Theory, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 323–334, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1177/1473095209341327.
[32]
A. Lahoud, ‘Post-Traumatic Urbanism’, Architectural Design, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 14–23, Sep. 2010, doi: 10.1002/ad.1128.
[33]
Thomas Abbot, Roxana Aslan, Riley O’Brien and Nathan Serafin, ‘Embrace abolitionist planning to fight Trumpism’. [Online]. Available: https://www.progressivecity.net/single-post/2018/04/06/EMBRACE-ABOLITIONIST-PLANNING-TO-FIGHT-TRUMPISM
[34]
D. Petrescu, C. Petcou, and C. Baibarac, ‘Co-producing commons-based resilience: lessons from R-Urban’, Building Research & Information, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 717–736, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1214891.
[35]
G. Carabelli, The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018 [Online]. Available: http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3192314340004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
[36]
M. L. de Souza, ‘Together with the state, despite the state, against the state. Social Movements as “Critical Urban Planning” Agents’, City, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 327–342, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1080/13604810600982347.
[37]
N. Awan, T. Schneider, and J. Till, ‘Chapter 3: The operations of spatial agency’, in Spatial agency: other ways of doing architecture, London: Routledge, 2011, pp. 69–82 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=491ebea7-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[38]
V. Mukhija, ‘Urban Design for a Planet of Informal Cities’, in Companion to Urban Design, Routledge, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203844434.ch43
[39]
H. Mattila, ‘Aesthetic justice and urban planning: Who ought to have the right to design cities?’, GeoJournal, vol. 58, no. 2/3, pp. 131–138, 2002, doi: 10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010832.88129.cc.
[40]
A. A. Frediani, ‘Re-imagining Participatory Design: Reflecting on the ASF-UK Change by Design Methodology’, Design Issues, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 98–111, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1162/DESI_a_00403.
[41]
A. Appadurai, ‘Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics’, Environment and Urbanization, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 23–43, 2001, doi: 10.1177/095624780101300203.
[42]
P. Blundell Jones, D. Petrescu, and J. Till, Eds., Architecture and participation. London: Routledge, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203022863
[43]
AbdouMaliq Simone , and  Edgar Pieterse, New Urban Worlds : Inhabiting Dissonant Times. Polity Press, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/UCL/reader.action?docID=4983712&ppg=173
[44]
Laura Roth and Kate Shea Baird, ‘Municipalism and the Feminization of Politics’. [Online]. Available: https://roarmag.org/magazine/municipalism-feminization-urban-politics/
[45]
S. Loo, ‘Design-Ing Ethics: the Good, the Bad and the Performative’, in Design and ethics: reflections on practice, London: Routledge, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f6e15cf3-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[46]
J. Hou, ‘Citizen Design: participation and beyond.’, in Companion to Urban Design, Routledge, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203844434.ch25
[47]
C. Luansang, S. Boonmahathanakorn, and M. L. Domingo-Price, ‘The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia’, Environment and Urbanization, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 497–512, 2012, doi: 10.1177/0956247812456125.
[48]
N. Wahby, ‘Institutions and Populism in the Global South-Lessons for the Brexit-Trump Era’, City & Community, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 139–144, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1111/cico.12234.
[49]
K. Umemoto, ‘Walking in Another’s Shoes’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 17–31, Sep. 2001, doi: 10.1177/0739456X0102100102.
[50]
Y. Lee, ‘Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process’, CoDesign, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 31–50, 2008, doi: 10.1080/15710880701875613.
[51]
M. B. G. Choguill, ‘A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries’, Habitat International, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 431–444, 1996, doi: 10.1016/0197-3975(96)00020-3.
[52]
A. Frediani and C. Boano, ‘Processes for Just Products: the Capability Space of Participatory Design’, in The capability approach, technology and design, London: Springer, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-94-007-3879-9
[53]
C. Boano and G. Talocci, ‘Fences and Profanations: Questioning the Sacredness of Urban Design’, Journal of Urban Design, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 700–721, 2014, doi: 10.1080/13574809.2014.943701.
[54]
P. Q. Hirst, Space and power: politics, war and architecture. Cambridge: Polity, 2005.
[55]
‘View of Toward an Architecture of Dissensus: Participatory Urbanism in South-East Asia - Boano, C. and Kelling, E. (2013)’ [Online]. Available: https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/Boano/945
[56]
I. Doucet, ‘Understanding social engagement in architecture’, in The Routledge companion to architecture and social engagement, F. Karim, Ed. New York, NY: Routledge, 2018 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3a3e354f-f5fd-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[57]
C. Luansang, S. Boonmahathanakorn, and M. L. Domingo-Price, ‘The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia’, Environment and Urbanization, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 497–512, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0956247812456125.
[58]
J. Till, ‘Architecture of the Impure Community’, in Occupying architecture: between the architect and the user, J. Hill, Ed. London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 34–42 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203983829
[59]
F. Cleaver, ‘Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development’, in Participation: The New Tyranny?, London: Zed Books, 2001, pp. 36–55.
[60]
J. Forester, ‘Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from Facilitating Dialogue and Moderating Debate to Mediating Negotiations’, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 447–456, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1080/01944360608976765.
[61]
B. Russell, ‘Radical municipalism: demanding the future’, Jul. 26, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.opendemocracy.net/plan-c/radical-municipalism-demanding-future
[62]
M. Siemiatycki, ‘The Role of the Planning Scholar’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 147–159, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1177/0739456X12440729.
[63]
Fraser, Nancy, ‘Rethinking Recognition’, New Left Review, vol. 3, pp. 1103–1124 [Online]. Available: https://newleftreview.org/II/3/nancy-fraser-rethinking-recognition
[64]
K. Martens, ‘Participatory Experiments from the Bottom up: The role of environmental NGOs and citizen groups’, European Journal of Spatial Development, vol. 18, pp. 1–20, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://archive.nordregio.se/European-Journal-of-Spatial-Development/Archive/2005/index.html
[65]
V. Watson, ‘Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics’, Planning Theory, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 31–50, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1473095206061020.
[66]
H. Yacobi, ‘The NGOization of Space: Dilemmas of Social Change, Planning Policy, and the Israeli Public Sphere’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 745–758, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1068/d459t.
[67]
H. Yacobi, J. Ventura, and S. Danzig, ‘Walls, enclaves and the (counter) politics of design’, Journal of Urban Design, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 481–494, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.1080/13574809.2016.1184566.
[68]
John Forester, ‘Listening: the social policy of everyday life in Planning in the Face of Power. University of California Press, Berkeley’, in Planning in the face of power, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a080e248-73f4-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[69]
T. A. Markus and D. Cameron, ‘Why language matters’, in The words between the spaces: buildings and language, vol. The architext series, London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 1–17 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9f5a20ed-8b33-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[70]
T. Fenster, ‘Cognitive Temporal Mapping: The Three Steps Method in Urban Planning’, Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 479–498, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1080/14649350903417266.
[71]
Akhil  Gupta and Ferguson, D., ‘Discipline and Practice:"The Field” As Site, Method, and Location In Anthropology’, …  locations: Boundaries and grounds of a  … [Online]. Available: http://www.academia.edu/252003/Discipline_and_Practice_The_Field_As_Site_Method_and_Location_In_Anthropology
[72]
‘McDowell, L (1992a), Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 17 399–416’ [Online]. Available: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/pdf/Doing_Gender.pdf
[73]
C. Read, J. Earnest, M. Ali, and V. Poonacha, ‘Applying a Practical, Participatory Action Research Framework for Producing Knowledge, Action and Change in Communities: A Health Case Study from Gujarat, Western India’, in M2 Models and Methodologies for Community Engagement, R. Tiwari, M. Lommerse, and D. Smith, Eds. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2014, pp. 91–105 [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-981-4585-11-8_6
[74]
M. Leivas, ‘From the body to the city: participatory action research with social cartography for transformative education and global citizenship’, Educational Action Research, pp. 1–16, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1080/09650792.2018.1519453.
[75]
S. Amir, ‘Rethinking Design Policy in the Third World’, Design Issues, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 68–75, 2004, doi: 10.1162/0747936042311995.
[76]
M. Komarova and M. McKnight, ‘“We Are Watching You Too”: Reflections on Doing Visual Research in a Contested City’, Sociological Research Online, vol. 18, no. 1, 2013, doi: 10.5153/sro.2877.
[77]
G. Rose, ‘Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 305–320, 1997, doi: 10.1191/030913297673302122.
[78]
R. Flowerdew and D. Martin, Methods in human geography: a guide for students doing a research project, 2nd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781405898416
[79]
N. Hamdi, ‘Chapter 12. Insiders Out and Outsiders: Practical wisdom and the co-Production of Knowledge’, in The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice, vol. Earthscan tools for community planning, New York, NY: Routledge, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315
[80]
D. Mitlin and S. Bartlett, ‘Editorial: Co-production – key ideas’, Environment and Urbanization, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 355–366, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1177/0956247818791931.
[81]
Sarkissian, W. and Bunjamin-Mau, W. et al., ‘Designing and managing a workshop’, in SpeakOut: the step-by-step guide to SpeakOuts and community workshops, vol. Tools for community planning, London: Earthscan, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=55416db3-8436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[82]
Saba Golchehr, ‘Data-driven design for civic participation : Introducing digital methods for on-going civic engagement for design in public space’, pp. 56–70, doi: 10.4324/9781315110332-5. [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315110332/chapters/10.4324/9781315110332-5
[83]
J. Burgess, C. M. Harrison, and M. Limb, ‘People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the City’, Urban Studies, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 455–473, Dec. 1988, doi: 10.1080/00420988820080631.
[84]
‘We Drew What We Imagined: Participatory Mapping Performance, and Arts of Landscape Making, • Sletto, B. I., (2009)’ [Online]. Available: http://www.iapad.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Sletto_CA_August_20091.pdf
[85]
P. Freire and M. Bergman Ramos, Pedagogy of the oppressed, New revised edition. London: Penguin Books, 1996.
[86]
D. Haraway, ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, Feminist Studies, vol. 14, no. 3, Autumn 1988, doi: 10.2307/3178066.
[87]
SARA KINDON, ‘Participatory Action Research: Origins, approaches and methods’, pp. 35–44, doi: 10.4324/9780203933671-13. [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781134135561/chapters/10.4324/9780203933671-13
[88]
Jeremy Till, ‘Imperfect ethics’, in Architecture depends, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2009, pp. 171–187 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=730082ec-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[89]
M. Miessen, ‘Collaboration and the conflictual, Published in The nightmare of participation - p. 91-104’, Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2010.
[90]
B. Cooke and U. Kothari, ‘The case for participation as tyranny’, in Participation: the new tyranny?, London: Zed Books, 2001, pp. 1–15 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c4bd2ae2-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[91]
C. Mouffe, Agonistics: thinking the world politically. London: Verso, 2013.
[92]
T. Kaminer, ‘Theories of participation, theories of contestation’, in The efficacy of architecture: political contestation and agency, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2017.
[93]
C. O. N. Moser, ‘Community participation in urban projects in the Third World’, Progress in Planning, vol. 32, pp. 71–133, Jan. 1989, doi: 10.1016/0305-9006(89)90010-X.
[94]
L. Sandercock, ‘Re/presenting Planning’s Histories’, in Towards cosmopolis: planning for multicultural cities, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1998, pp. 33–54 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a57f9aa3-151e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
[95]
H. Yacobi, ‘Social Exclusion, Housing Environment and Tolerant Planning: The Case of the Jahelin Bedouin Tribe. Hagar - International Social Science Review. 69-84’, Hagar international social science review = Hājir, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 69–83, 2004.
[96]
H. Abu-Orf, ‘Is planning possible in cities divided by violent conflict?’, International Development Planning Review, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 321–342, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.3828/idpr.2011.16.
[97]
R. Bower, Architecture and space re-imagined: learning from the difference, multiplicity, and otherness of development practice, vol. Routledge Research in Place, Space and Politics. New York: Routledge, 2017 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315678146
[98]
N. Hamdi and R. Goethert, ‘Chapter 2. Action Planning In Theory’, in Action planning for cities: a guide to community practice, Chichester: John Wiley, 1997, pp. 23–59.
[99]
N. Hamdi, ‘Chapter 3. Deciding how to decide’, in The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice, vol. Earthscan tools for community planning, New York, NY: Routledge, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315
[100]
N. Hamdi, ‘Chapter 6. In Search of a Community and Structure of Place’, in Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities, London: Earthscan, 2004, pp. 58–72.
[101]
R. Luck, ‘Learning to talk to users in participatory design situations’, Design Studies, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 217–242, 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.002.
[102]
‘Environment and Urbanization’ [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/eau
[103]
Camillo Boano and William Hunter, ‘Collaboration and the conflictual’, in The nightmare of participation: [crossbench praxis as a mode of criticality], Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2010, pp. 91–104.
[104]
N. Hamdi, ‘Chapter 7. Participation in practice’, in The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice, vol. Earthscan tools for community planning, New York, NY: Routledge, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315
[105]
D. Petrescu and P. Chiles, ‘Agency: alternative practices and alternative worlds’, Architectural Research Quarterly, vol. 13, no. 02, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1017/S1359135509990194.
[106]
N. Hamdi, ‘Chapter 8. PEAS and the Sociable Side of Practice’, in The placemaker’s guide to building community, vol. Tools for community planning, London: Earthscan, 2010, pp. 141–152.
[107]
L. Sandercock and G. Attili, ‘Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue’, Planning Theory & Practice, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 23–45, Mar. 2010, doi: 10.1080/14649350903538012.
[108]
N. Hamdi, ‘Chapter 9. Reasoning to Scale’, in The placemaker’s guide to building community, vol. Tools for community planning, London: Earthscan, 2010, pp. 160–153.
[109]
N. Hamdi, ‘Chapter 11. Governance and networks: organizing from inside out’, in Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities, London: Earthscan, 2004, pp. 107–115.
[110]
‘Environment and Urbanization’ [Online]. Available: http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/eau
[111]
D. Mitlin and J. Thompson, ‘Participatory approaches in urban areas: strengthening civil society or        reinforcing the status quo?’, Environment and Urbanization, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 231–250, 1995, doi: 10.1177/095624789500700113.
[112]
D. Petrescu and C. Petcou, ‘Tactics for a Transgressive Practice’, Architectural Design, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 58–65, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1002/ad.1675.
[113]
D. Mitlin and D. Satterthwaite, Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction. London: Earthscan, 2004.
[114]
R. Cowan, ‘Placecheck: a user’s guide. ’. Urban Design Alliance , 2001.
[115]
J. Robinson, ‘White women researching/representing “others”: from antiapartheid to postcolonialism?’, in Writing women and space: colonial and postcolonial geographies, vol. Mappings, New York: Guilford Press, 1994, pp. 197–228.
[116]
M. Foucault, ‘The eye of power’, in Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977, Harlow: Longman, 1980, pp. 146–165.
[117]
R. Burgess, M. Carmona, and T. Kolstee, ‘Contemporary policies for enablement and participation : a critical review’, in The challenge of sustainable cities: neoliberalism and urban strategies in developing countries, London: Zed, 1997, pp. 138–162 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9c4bae9a-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[118]
D. M. Petrescu and K. Trogal, ‘The social (re)production of Architecture in “crisis-riddled” times’, in The social (re)production of architecture: politics, values and actions in contemporary practice, D. Petrescu and K. Trogal, Eds. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017 [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717180
[119]
P. Jenkins, H. Smith, and Y. P. Wang, ‘Post-1990 issues in planning and housing’, in Planning and housing in the rapidly urbanising world, vol. Housing, planning, and design series, London: Routledge, 2007, pp. 178–203 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ee5bfbd5-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[120]
B. Cooke and U. Kothari, ‘The case for participation as tyranny’, in Participation: the new tyranny?, London: Zed Books, 2001, pp. 1–15 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c4bd2ae2-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[121]
A. Blunt and R. M. Dowling, ‘Setting up home: an introduction’, in Home, vol. Key ideas in geography, London: Routledge, 2006, pp. 1–31 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=2394bfc2-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[122]
B. M. Lane, ‘What is home?’, in Housing and dwelling: perspectives on modern domestic architecture, Abingdon: Routledge, 2007, pp. 50–73 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f87a55cc-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[123]
D. Coole, ‘Experiencing Discourse: Corporeal Communicators and the Embodiment of Power’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 413–433, 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2006.00258.x.
[124]
S. Kumar, ‘Conceptual specifications’, in Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners, Rugby: Practical Action Publishing, 2002, pp. 23–52 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ca0786a4-8836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[125]
N. Hamdi, Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. London: Earthscan, 2004.
[126]
J. Sundberg, ‘Looking for the critical geographer, or why bodies and geographies matter to the emergence of critical geographies of Latin America’, Geoforum, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.03.006.
[127]
E. Swyngedouw and J. Wilson, ‘Insurgent architects and the spectral return of the urban political’, in Planning against the political: democratic deficits in European territorial governance, J. Metzger, P. Allmendinger, and S. Oosterlynck, Eds. New York: Routledge, 2015, pp. 215–225 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=20930d20-33c9-e711-80cd-005056af4099
[128]
S. L. Kindon, R. Pain, and M. Kesby, ‘Participatory action research: origins, approaches and methods’, in Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place, vol. Routledge studies in human geography, Abingdon: Routledge, 2007, pp. 9–18 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781134135561
[129]
S. Patel and D. Mitlin, ‘Grassroots-driven development: The alliance of SPARC, the National Slum Dwellers Federation and Mahila Milan’, in Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction, London: Earthscan, 2004, pp. 216–241 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=5b1d1c38-8436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[130]
N. Wates, ‘General principles A-Z’, in Community planning handbook : how people can shape their cities, towns and villages in any part of the world, London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, 2000, pp. 11–21.
[131]
A. A. Frediani and C. Boano, ‘Processes for just products: the capability space of participatory design’, in The capability approach, technology and design, vol. Philosophy of engineering and technology, Dordrecht: Springer, 2012, pp. 203–222 [Online]. Available: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-94-007-3879-9
[132]
R. Zetter, ‘Market enablement or sustainable development : the conflicting paradigms of urbanization’, in Planning in cities: sustainability and growth in the developing world, vol. Urban management series, London: ITDG, 2002, pp. 31–42 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=bea9ee93-8836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[133]
A. Cornwall and V. S. P. Coelho, ‘Spaces for change?: The politics of participation in new democratic arenas’, in Spaces for change?: the politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas, vol. Claiming citizenship, London: Zed, 2007, pp. 1–29 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=722bea86-8336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[134]
J. Glass, ‘Facing the Future by Designing in Resilience: An Architectural Perspective’, in Hazards and the built environment: attaining built-in resilience, Abingdon: Routledge, 2008, pp. 172–188 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ad954536-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[135]
W. Seymour, ‘Exhuming the Body: Revisiting the Role of the Visible Body in Ethnographic Research’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1188–1197, 2007, doi: 10.1177/1049732307308517.
[136]
R. Ramirez, ‘Integrated Informality in the Barrios of Havana’, in Rethinking the informal city: critical perspectives from Latin America, vol. Remapping cultural history, New York: Berghahn Books, 2010, pp. 137–162 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=222f22f0-8536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[137]
J. F. C. Turner, ‘Issues in Self-Help and Self-Managed Housing’, in Self-help housing: a critique, London: Mansell, 1982, pp. 99–113 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c2ed8bb4-6536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[138]
A. Madanipour, ‘Introduction’, in Whose public space?: international case studies in urban design and development, London: Routledge, 2010, pp. 1–15 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=e4a879a0-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[139]
K. Dovey, ‘Home and homelessness’, in Home environments, vol. Human behavior and environment, New York: Plenum Press, 1985, pp. 33–64 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8e4fc2f6-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[140]
R. Eyben, C. Harris, and J. Pettit, ‘Introduction: Exploring Power for Change’, IDS Bulletin, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1–10, 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00318.x.
[141]
J. Till, ‘Imperfect ethics’, in Architecture depends, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2009, pp. 171–187 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=730082ec-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[142]
N. Schuermans and C. Newton, ‘Being a young and foreign researcher in South Africa: Towards a postcolonial dialogue’, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 295–300, 2012, doi: 10.1111/sjtg.12005_4.
[143]
‘Progress in Human Geography’ [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/publication/37137