1
A. Cuthbert. Chapter 6: Urban Design and Spatial Political Economy. Companion to Urban Design. Routledge 2014.
2
Martin D, McCann E, Purcell M. Space, Scale, Governance, and Representation: Contemporary Geographical Perspectives on Urban Politics and Policy. Journal of Urban Affairs. 2003;25:113–21. doi: 10.1111/1467-9906.t01-1-00001
3
Sanoff H. Multiple views of participatory design. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR. 2014;2:57–69.
4
Watson V. Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues. Urban Studies. 2009;46:2259–75. doi: 10.1177/0042098009342598
5
Schindler S. Towards a paradigm of Southern urbanism. City. 2017;21:47–64. doi: 10.1080/13604813.2016.1263494
6
Barry J, Horst M, Inch A, et al. Unsettling planning theory. Planning Theory. 2018;17:418–38. doi: 10.1177/1473095218763842
7
Doreen Massey. Politics and Space/Time. New Left Review. 1992;196.
8
Rios M. Envisioning Citizenship: Toward a Polity Approach in Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design. 2008;13:213–29. doi: 10.1080/13574800801965692
9
Roy A. Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2016;40:200–9. doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12274
10
McFarlane C. Knowledge, learning and development: a post-rationalist approach. Progress in Development Studies. 2006;6:287–305. doi: 10.1191/1464993406ps144oa
11
Cornwall A. Historical perspectives on participation in development. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 2006;44:62–83. doi: 10.1080/14662040600624460
12
A. Escobar. The making and the unmaking of the third world through development. The post-development reader. London: Zed Books 1996.
13
Hickey S, Mohan G. Towards Participation as Transformation: Critical Themes and Challenges. Participation: from tyranny to transformation? : exploring new approaches to participation in development. London: Zed 2004:3–24.
14
Mitlin D. With and beyond the state -- co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization. 2008;20:339–60. doi: 10.1177/0956247808096117
15
Rendell J. Only resist: Five particular qualities might characterise a specifically feminist approach to critical spatial practice, suggests Jane Rendell. Architectural Review. 2018;243:8–18.
16
Miraftab F. Making neo-liberal governance: the disempowering work of empowerment. International Planning Studies. 2004;9:239–59. doi: 10.1080/13563470500050130
17
Derickson KD. On the politics of recognition in critical urban scholarship. Urban Geography. 2016;37:824–9. doi: 10.1080/02723638.2015.1105483
18
Irazábal C. Public, Private, People Partnerships (PPPPs): Reflections from Latin American Cases. In: Lehavi A, ed. Private communities and urban governance: theoretical and comparative perspectives. Switzerland: Springer 2016:191–214.
19
Gaventa J, Barrett G. So What Difference Does it Make? Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement. IDS Working Papers. 2010;2010:01–72. doi: 10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00347_2.x
20
Roy A. Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai. Antipode. 2009;41:159–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00660.x
21
Catalina Ortiz and Camillo Boano. The Medellín’s shifting geopolitics of informality : The Encircled Garden as a dispositive of civil disenfranchisement? 189–207.
22
Marcuse P. From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City. 2009;13:185–97. doi: 10.1080/13604810902982177
23
Sun X, Huang R. Spatial meaning-making and urban activism: Two tales of anti-PX protests in urban China. Journal of Urban Affairs. 2018;1–21. doi: 10.1080/07352166.2018.1443010
24
Rolnik R. Place, inhabitance and citizenship: the right to housing and the right to the city in the contemporary urban world. International Journal of Housing Policy. 2014;14:293–300. doi: 10.1080/14616718.2014.936178
25
Bell B, Wakeford K. Expanding architecture: design as activism. New York: Metropolis Books 2008.
26
Miraftab F. Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship: The Story of Western Cape Anti-eviction Campaign in South Africa. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2005;25:200–17. doi: 10.1177/0739456X05282182
27
Winkler T. Black texts on white paper: Learning to resistant texts as an approach towards decolonising planning. Planning Theory. Published Online First: 4 November 2017. doi: 10.1177/1473095217739335
28
Al-Harithy H. The participative discourse: community activism in post-war reconstruction. In: Saliba R, ed. Urban design in the Arab world: reconceptualizing boundaries. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate 2015:39–50.
29
Carabelli G. Grassroots Movements and the Production of (Other) Space(s) - published in The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan 2018.
30
Erfan A. Confronting collective traumas: an exploration of therapeutic planning. Planning Theory & Practice. 2017;18:34–50. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2016.1249909
31
Fawaz M. Hezbollah as Urban Planner? Questions To and From Planning Theory. Planning Theory. 2009;8:323–34. doi: 10.1177/1473095209341327
32
Lahoud A. Post-Traumatic Urbanism. Architectural Design. 2010;80:14–23. doi: 10.1002/ad.1128
33
Thomas Abbot, Roxana Aslan, Riley O’Brien and Nathan Serafin. Embrace abolitionist planning to fight Trumpism. https://www.progressivecity.net/single-post/2018/04/06/EMBRACE-ABOLITIONIST-PLANNING-TO-FIGHT-TRUMPISM
34
Petrescu D, Petcou C, Baibarac C. Co-producing commons-based resilience: lessons from R-Urban. Building Research & Information. 2016;44:717–36. doi: 10.1080/09613218.2016.1214891
35
Carabelli G. The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan 2018.
36
de Souza ML. Together with the state, despite the state, against the state. Social Movements as ‘Critical Urban Planning’ Agents. City. 2006;10:327–42. doi: 10.1080/13604810600982347
37
Awan N, Schneider T, Till J. Chapter 3: The operations of spatial agency. Spatial agency: other ways of doing architecture. London: Routledge 2011:69–82.
38
Mukhija V. Urban Design for a Planet of Informal Cities. Companion to Urban Design. Routledge 2014.
39
Mattila H. Aesthetic justice and urban planning: Who ought to have the right to design cities? GeoJournal. 2002;58:131–8. doi: 10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010832.88129.cc
40
Frediani AA. Re-imagining Participatory Design: Reflecting on the ASF-UK Change by Design Methodology. Design Issues. 2016;32:98–111. doi: 10.1162/DESI_a_00403
41
Appadurai A. Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization. 2001;13:23–43. doi: 10.1177/095624780101300203
42
Blundell Jones P, Petrescu D, Till J, editors. Architecture and participation. London: Routledge 2012.
43
AbdouMaliq Simone , and Edgar Pieterse. New Urban Worlds : Inhabiting Dissonant Times. Polity Press 2017.
44
Laura Roth, Kate Shea Baird. Municipalism and the Feminization of Politics. https://roarmag.org/magazine/municipalism-feminization-urban-politics/
45
Loo S. Design-Ing Ethics: the Good, the Bad and the Performative. Design and ethics: reflections on practice. London: Routledge 2012.
46
Hou J. Citizen Design: participation and beyond. Companion to Urban Design. Routledge 2014.
47
Luansang C, Boonmahathanakorn S, Domingo-Price ML. The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia. Environment and Urbanization. 2012;24:497–512. doi: 10.1177/0956247812456125
48
Wahby N. Institutions and Populism in the Global South-Lessons for the Brexit-Trump Era. City & Community. 2017;16:139–44. doi: 10.1111/cico.12234
49
Umemoto K. Walking in Another’s Shoes. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2001;21:17–31. doi: 10.1177/0739456X0102100102
50
Lee Y. Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process. CoDesign. 2008;4:31–50. doi: 10.1080/15710880701875613
51
Choguill MBG. A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries. Habitat International. 1996;20:431–44. doi: 10.1016/0197-3975(96)00020-3
52
Frediani A, Boano C. Processes for Just Products: the Capability Space of Participatory Design. The capability approach, technology and design. London: Springer 2012.
53
Boano C, Talocci G. Fences and Profanations: Questioning the Sacredness of Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design. 2014;19:700–21. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2014.943701
54
Hirst PQ. Space and power: politics, war and architecture. Cambridge: Polity 2005.
55
View of Toward an Architecture of Dissensus: Participatory Urbanism in South-East Asia - Boano, C. and Kelling, E. (2013).
56
Doucet I. Understanding social engagement in architecture. In: Karim F, ed. The Routledge companion to architecture and social engagement. New York, NY: Routledge 2018.
57
Luansang C, Boonmahathanakorn S, Domingo-Price ML. The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia. Environment and Urbanization. 2012;24:497–512. doi: 10.1177/0956247812456125
58
Till J. Architecture of the Impure Community. In: Hill J, ed. Occupying architecture: between the architect and the user. London: Routledge 1998:34–42.
59
Cleaver F. Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development. Participation: The New Tyranny?. London: Zed Books 2001:36–55.
60
Forester J. Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from Facilitating Dialogue and Moderating Debate to Mediating Negotiations. Journal of the American Planning Association. 2006;72:447–56. doi: 10.1080/01944360608976765
61
Russell B. Radical municipalism: demanding the future. 2017. https://www.opendemocracy.net/plan-c/radical-municipalism-demanding-future
62
Siemiatycki M. The Role of the Planning Scholar. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2012;32:147–59. doi: 10.1177/0739456X12440729
63
Fraser, Nancy. Rethinking Recognition. New Left Review. ;3:1103–24.
64
Martens K. Participatory Experiments from the Bottom up: The role of environmental NGOs and citizen groups. European Journal of Spatial Development. 2005;18:1–20.
65
Watson V. Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics. Planning Theory. 2006;5:31–50. doi: 10.1177/1473095206061020
66
Yacobi H. The NGOization of Space: Dilemmas of Social Change, Planning Policy, and the Israeli Public Sphere. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 2007;25:745–58. doi: 10.1068/d459t
67
Yacobi H, Ventura J, Danzig S. Walls, enclaves and the (counter) politics of design. Journal of Urban Design. 2016;21:481–94. doi: 10.1080/13574809.2016.1184566
68
John Forester. Listening: the social policy of everyday life in Planning in the Face of Power. University of California Press, Berkeley. Planning in the face of power. Berkeley: University of California Press 1989.
69
Markus TA, Cameron D. Why language matters. The words between the spaces: buildings and language. London: Routledge 2002:1–17.
70
Fenster T. Cognitive Temporal Mapping: The Three Steps Method in Urban Planning. Planning Theory & Practice. 2009;10:479–98. doi: 10.1080/14649350903417266
71
Akhil Gupta and Ferguson, D. Discipline and Practice:"The Field” As Site, Method, and Location In Anthropology. … locations: Boundaries and grounds of a ….
72
McDowell, L (1992a), Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 17 399–416.
73
Read C, Earnest J, Ali M, et al. Applying a Practical, Participatory Action Research Framework for Producing Knowledge, Action and Change in Communities: A Health Case Study from Gujarat, Western India. In: Tiwari R, Lommerse M, Smith D, eds. M2 Models and Methodologies for Community Engagement. Singapore: Springer Singapore 2014:91–105.
74
Leivas M. From the body to the city: participatory action research with social cartography for transformative education and global citizenship. Educational Action Research. 2018;1–16. doi: 10.1080/09650792.2018.1519453
75
Amir S. Rethinking Design Policy in the Third World. Design Issues. 2004;20:68–75. doi: 10.1162/0747936042311995
76
Komarova M, McKnight M. ‘We Are Watching You Too’: Reflections on Doing Visual Research in a Contested City. Sociological Research Online. 2013;18. doi: 10.5153/sro.2877
77
Rose G. Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography. 1997;21:305–20. doi: 10.1191/030913297673302122
78
Flowerdew R, Martin D. Methods in human geography: a guide for students doing a research project. 2nd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall 2005.
79
Hamdi N. Chapter 12. Insiders Out and Outsiders: Practical wisdom and the co-Production of Knowledge. The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. New York, NY: Routledge 2014.
80
Mitlin D, Bartlett S. Editorial: Co-production – key ideas. Environment and Urbanization. 2018;30:355–66. doi: 10.1177/0956247818791931
81
Sarkissian, W. and Bunjamin-Mau, W. et al. Designing and managing a workshop. SpeakOut: the step-by-step guide to SpeakOuts and community workshops. London: Earthscan 2009.
82
Saba Golchehr. Data-driven design for civic participation : Introducing digital methods for on-going civic engagement for design in public space. ;56–70. doi: 10.4324/9781315110332-5
83
Burgess J, Harrison CM, Limb M. People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the City. Urban Studies. 1988;25:455–73. doi: 10.1080/00420988820080631
84
We Drew What We Imagined: Participatory Mapping Performance, and Arts of Landscape Making, • Sletto, B. I., (2009).
85
Freire P, Bergman Ramos M. Pedagogy of the oppressed. New revised edition. London: Penguin Books 1996.
86
Haraway D. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies. 1988;14. doi: 10.2307/3178066
87
SARA KINDON. Participatory Action Research: Origins, approaches and methods. ;35–44. doi: 10.4324/9780203933671-13
88
Jeremy Till. Imperfect ethics. Architecture depends. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 2009:171–87.
89
Miessen M. Collaboration and the conflictual. The nightmare of participation. Berlin: Sternberg Press 2010:91–104.
90
Cooke B, Kothari U. The case for participation as tyranny. Participation: the new tyranny?. London: Zed Books 2001:1–15.
91
Mouffe C. Agonistics: thinking the world politically. London: Verso 2013.
92
Kaminer T. Theories of participation, theories of contestation. The efficacy of architecture: political contestation and agency. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge 2017.
93
Moser CON. Community participation in urban projects in the Third World. Progress in Planning. 1989;32:71–133. doi: 10.1016/0305-9006(89)90010-X
94
Sandercock L. Re/presenting Planning’s Histories. Towards cosmopolis: planning for multicultural cities. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons 1998:33–54.
95
Yacobi H. Social Exclusion, Housing Environment and Tolerant Planning: The Case of the Jahelin Bedouin Tribe. Hagar - International Social Science Review. 69-84. Hagar international social science review = Hājir. 2004;5:69–83.
96
Abu-Orf H. Is planning possible in cities divided by violent conflict? International Development Planning Review. 2011;33:321–42. doi: 10.3828/idpr.2011.16
97
Bower R. Architecture and space re-imagined: learning from the difference, multiplicity, and otherness of development practice. New York: Routledge 2017.
98
Hamdi N, Goethert R. Chapter 2. Action Planning In Theory. Action planning for cities: a guide to community practice. Chichester: John Wiley 1997:23–59.
99
Hamdi N. Chapter 3. Deciding how to decide. The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. New York, NY: Routledge 2014.
100
Hamdi N. Chapter 6. In Search of a Community and Structure of Place. Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. London: Earthscan 2004:58–72.
101
Luck R. Learning to talk to users in participatory design situations. Design Studies. 2007;28:217–42. doi: 10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.002
102
Environment and Urbanization.
103
Camillo Boano and William Hunter. Collaboration and the conflictual. The nightmare of participation: [crossbench praxis as a mode of criticality]. Berlin: Sternberg Press 2010:91–104.
104
Hamdi N. Chapter 7. Participation in practice. The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. New York, NY: Routledge 2014.
105
Petrescu D, Chiles P. Agency: alternative practices and alternative worlds. Architectural Research Quarterly. 2009;13. doi: 10.1017/S1359135509990194
106
Hamdi N. Chapter 8. PEAS and the Sociable Side of Practice. The placemaker’s guide to building community. London: Earthscan 2010:141–52.
107
Sandercock L, Attili G. Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue. Planning Theory & Practice. 2010;11:23–45. doi: 10.1080/14649350903538012
108
Hamdi N. Chapter 9. Reasoning to Scale. The placemaker’s guide to building community. London: Earthscan 2010:160–153.
109
Hamdi N. Chapter 11. Governance and networks: organizing from inside out. Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. London: Earthscan 2004:107–15.
110
Environment and Urbanization.
111
Mitlin D, Thompson J. Participatory approaches in urban areas: strengthening civil society or reinforcing the status quo? Environment and Urbanization. 1995;7:231–50. doi: 10.1177/095624789500700113
112
Petrescu D, Petcou C. Tactics for a Transgressive Practice. Architectural Design. 2013;83:58–65. doi: 10.1002/ad.1675
113
Mitlin D, Satterthwaite D. Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction. London: Earthscan 2004.
114
Cowan R. Placecheck: a user’s guide. . 2001.
115
Robinson J. White women researching/representing ‘others’: from antiapartheid to postcolonialism? Writing women and space: colonial and postcolonial geographies. New York: Guilford Press 1994:197–228.
116
Foucault M. The eye of power. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Harlow: Longman 1980:146–65.
117
Burgess R, Carmona M, Kolstee T. Contemporary policies for enablement and participation : a critical review. The challenge of sustainable cities: neoliberalism and urban strategies in developing countries. London: Zed 1997:138–62.
118
D. M. Petrescu, K. Trogal. The social (re)production of Architecture in ‘crisis-riddled’ times. In: Petrescu D, Trogal K, eds. The social (re)production of architecture: politics, values and actions in contemporary practice. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2017.
119
Jenkins P, Smith H, Wang YP. Post-1990 issues in planning and housing. Planning and housing in the rapidly urbanising world. London: Routledge 2007:178–203.
120
Cooke B, Kothari U. The case for participation as tyranny. Participation: the new tyranny?. London: Zed Books 2001:1–15.
121
Blunt A, Dowling RM. Setting up home: an introduction. Home. London: Routledge 2006:1–31.
122
Lane BM. What is home? Housing and dwelling: perspectives on modern domestic architecture. Abingdon: Routledge 2007:50–73.
123
Coole D. Experiencing Discourse: Corporeal Communicators and the Embodiment of Power. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 2007;9:413–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-856X.2006.00258.x
124
Kumar S. Conceptual specifications. Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing 2002:23–52.
125
Hamdi N. Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. London: Earthscan 2004.
126
Sundberg J. Looking for the critical geographer, or why bodies and geographies matter to the emergence of critical geographies of Latin America. Geoforum. 2005;36:17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.03.006
127
Swyngedouw E, Wilson J. Insurgent architects and the spectral return of the urban political. In: Metzger J, Allmendinger P, Oosterlynck S, eds. Planning against the political: democratic deficits in European territorial governance. New York: Routledge 2015:215–25.
128
Kindon SL, Pain R, Kesby M. Participatory action research: origins, approaches and methods. Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place. Abingdon: Routledge 2007:9–18.
129
Patel S, Mitlin D. Grassroots-driven development: The alliance of SPARC, the National Slum Dwellers Federation and Mahila Milan. Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction. London: Earthscan 2004:216–41.
130
Wates N. General principles A-Z. Community planning handbook : how people can shape their cities, towns and villages in any part of the world. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd 2000:11–21.
131
Frediani AA, Boano C. Processes for just products: the capability space of participatory design. The capability approach, technology and design. Dordrecht: Springer 2012:203–22.
132
Zetter R. Market enablement or sustainable development : the conflicting paradigms of urbanization. Planning in cities: sustainability and growth in the developing world. London: ITDG 2002:31–42.
133
Cornwall A, Coelho VSP. Spaces for change?: The politics of participation in new democratic arenas. Spaces for change?: the politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas. London: Zed 2007:1–29.
134
Glass J. Facing the Future by Designing in Resilience: An Architectural Perspective. Hazards and the built environment: attaining built-in resilience. Abingdon: Routledge 2008:172–88.
135
Seymour W. Exhuming the Body: Revisiting the Role of the Visible Body in Ethnographic Research. Qualitative Health Research. 2007;17:1188–97. doi: 10.1177/1049732307308517
136
Ramirez R. Integrated Informality in the Barrios of Havana. Rethinking the informal city: critical perspectives from Latin America. New York: Berghahn Books 2010:137–62.
137
Turner JFC. Issues in Self-Help and Self-Managed Housing. Self-help housing: a critique. London: Mansell 1982:99–113.
138
Madanipour A. Introduction. Whose public space?: international case studies in urban design and development. London: Routledge 2010:1–15.
139
Dovey K. Home and homelessness. Home environments. New York: Plenum Press 1985:33–64.
140
Eyben R, Harris C, Pettit J. Introduction: Exploring Power for Change. IDS Bulletin. 2006;37:1–10. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00318.x
141
Till J. Imperfect ethics. Architecture depends. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press 2009:171–87.
142
Schuermans N, Newton C. Being a young and foreign researcher in South Africa: Towards a postcolonial dialogue. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. 2012;33:295–300. doi: 10.1111/sjtg.12005_4
143
Progress in Human Geography.
