1.
A. Cuthbert: Chapter 6: Urban Design and Spatial Political Economy. In: Companion to Urban Design. Routledge (2014). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844434.
2.
Martin, D., McCann, E., Purcell, M.: Space, Scale, Governance, and Representation: Contemporary Geographical Perspectives on Urban Politics and Policy. Journal of Urban Affairs. 25, 113–121 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9906.t01-1-00001.
3.
Sanoff, H.: Multiple views of participatory design. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR. 2, 57–69 (2014).
4.
Watson, V.: Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues. Urban Studies. 46, 2259–2275 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342598.
5.
Schindler, S.: Towards a paradigm of Southern urbanism. City. 21, 47–64 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2016.1263494.
6.
Barry, J., Horst, M., Inch, A., Legacy, C., Rishi, S., Rivero, J.J., Taufen, A., Zanotto, J.M., Zitcer, A.: Unsettling planning theory. Planning Theory. 17, 418–438 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095218763842.
7.
Doreen Massey: Politics and Space/Time. New Left Review. 196, (1992).
8.
Rios, M.: Envisioning Citizenship: Toward a Polity Approach in Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design. 13, 213–229 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800801965692.
9.
Roy, A.: Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 40, 200–209 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12274.
10.
McFarlane, C.: Knowledge, learning and development: a post-rationalist approach. Progress in Development Studies. 6, 287–305 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993406ps144oa.
11.
Cornwall, A.: Historical perspectives on participation in development. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics. 44, 62–83 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040600624460.
12.
A. Escobar: The making and the unmaking of the third world through development. In: The post-development reader. Zed Books, London (1996).
13.
Hickey, S., Mohan, G.: Towards Participation as Transformation: Critical Themes and Challenges. In: Participation: from tyranny to transformation? : exploring new approaches to participation in development. pp. 3–24. Zed, London (2004).
14.
Mitlin, D.: With and beyond the state -- co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization. 20, 339–360 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247808096117.
15.
Rendell, J.: Only resist: Five particular qualities might characterise a specifically feminist approach to critical spatial practice, suggests Jane Rendell. Architectural Review. 243, 8–18 (2018).
16.
Miraftab, F.: Making neo-liberal governance: the disempowering work of empowerment. International Planning Studies. 9, 239–259 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470500050130.
17.
Derickson, K.D.: On the politics of recognition in critical urban scholarship. Urban Geography. 37, 824–829 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1105483.
18.
Irazábal, C.: Public, Private, People Partnerships (PPPPs): Reflections from Latin American Cases. In: Lehavi, A. (ed.) Private communities and urban governance: theoretical and comparative perspectives. pp. 191–214. Springer, Switzerland (2016).
19.
Gaventa, J., Barrett, G.: So What Difference Does it Make? Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement. IDS Working Papers. 2010, 01–72 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00347_2.x.
20.
Roy, A.: Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai. Antipode. 41, 159–179 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00660.x.
21.
Catalina Ortiz and Camillo Boano: The Medellín’s shifting geopolitics of informality : The Encircled Garden as a dispositive of civil disenfranchisement? Presented at the . https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315659275-16.
22.
Marcuse, P.: From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City. 13, 185–197 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982177.
23.
Sun, X., Huang, R.: Spatial meaning-making and urban activism: Two tales of anti-PX protests in urban China. Journal of Urban Affairs. 1–21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1443010.
24.
Rolnik, R.: Place, inhabitance and citizenship: the right to housing and the right to the city in the contemporary urban world. International Journal of Housing Policy. 14, 293–300 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2014.936178.
25.
Bell, B., Wakeford, K.: Expanding architecture: design as activism. Metropolis Books, New York (2008).
26.
Miraftab, F.: Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship: The Story of Western Cape Anti-eviction Campaign in South Africa. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 25, 200–217 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05282182.
27.
Winkler, T.: Black texts on white paper: Learning to resistant texts as an approach towards decolonising planning. Planning Theory. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095217739335.
28.
Al-Harithy, H.: The participative discourse: community activism in post-war reconstruction. In: Saliba, R. (ed.) Urban design in the Arab world: reconceptualizing boundaries. pp. 39–50. Ashgate, Farnham, Surrey, England (2015).
29.
Carabelli, G.: Grassroots Movements and the Production of (Other) Space(s) - published in The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. Presented at the (2018).
30.
Erfan, A.: Confronting collective traumas: an exploration of therapeutic planning. Planning Theory & Practice. 18, 34–50 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1249909.
31.
Fawaz, M.: Hezbollah as Urban Planner? Questions To and From Planning Theory. Planning Theory. 8, 323–334 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209341327.
32.
Lahoud, A.: Post-Traumatic Urbanism. Architectural Design. 80, 14–23 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1128.
33.
Thomas Abbot, Roxana Aslan, Riley O’Brien and Nathan Serafin: Embrace abolitionist planning to fight Trumpism, https://www.progressivecity.net/single-post/2018/04/06/EMBRACE-ABOLITIONIST-PLANNING-TO-FIGHT-TRUMPISM.
34.
Petrescu, D., Petcou, C., Baibarac, C.: Co-producing commons-based resilience: lessons from R-Urban. Building Research & Information. 44, 717–736 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1214891.
35.
Carabelli, G.: The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Hampshire (2018).
36.
de Souza, M.L.: Together with the state, despite the state, against the state. Social Movements as ‘Critical Urban Planning’ Agents. City. 10, 327–342 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810600982347.
37.
Awan, N., Schneider, T., Till, J.: Chapter 3: The operations of spatial agency. In: Spatial agency: other ways of doing architecture. pp. 69–82. Routledge, London (2011).
38.
Mukhija, V.: Urban Design for a Planet of Informal Cities. In: Companion to Urban Design. Routledge (2014). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844434.ch43.
39.
Mattila, H.: Aesthetic justice and urban planning: Who ought to have the right to design cities? GeoJournal. 58, 131–138 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010832.88129.cc.
40.
Frediani, A.A.: Re-imagining Participatory Design: Reflecting on the ASF-UK Change by Design Methodology. Design Issues. 32, 98–111 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00403.
41.
Appadurai, A.: Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization. 13, 23–43 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780101300203.
42.
Blundell Jones, P., Petrescu, D., Till, J. eds: Architecture and participation. Routledge, London (2012).
43.
AbdouMaliq Simone , and Edgar Pieterse: New Urban Worlds : Inhabiting Dissonant Times. Polity Press (2017).
44.
Laura Roth, Kate Shea Baird: Municipalism and the Feminization of Politics, https://roarmag.org/magazine/municipalism-feminization-urban-politics/.
45.
Loo, S.: Design-Ing Ethics: the Good, the Bad and the Performative. In: Design and ethics: reflections on practice. Routledge, London (2012).
46.
Hou, J.: Citizen Design: participation and beyond. In: Companion to Urban Design. Routledge (2014). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844434.ch25.
47.
Luansang, C., Boonmahathanakorn, S., Domingo-Price, M.L.: The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia. Environment and Urbanization. 24, 497–512 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247812456125.
48.
Wahby, N.: Institutions and Populism in the Global South-Lessons for the Brexit-Trump Era. City & Community. 16, 139–144 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12234.
49.
Umemoto, K.: Walking in Another’s Shoes. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 21, 17–31 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0102100102.
50.
Lee, Y.: Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process. CoDesign. 4, 31–50 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875613.
51.
Choguill, M.B.G.: A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries. Habitat International. 20, 431–444 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-3975(96)00020-3.
52.
Frediani, A., Boano, C.: Processes for Just Products: the Capability Space of Participatory Design. In: The capability approach, technology and design. Springer, London (2012).
53.
Boano, C., Talocci, G.: Fences and Profanations: Questioning the Sacredness of Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design. 19, 700–721 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.943701.
54.
Hirst, P.Q.: Space and power: politics, war and architecture. Polity, Cambridge (2005).
55.
View of Toward an Architecture of Dissensus: Participatory Urbanism in South-East Asia - Boano, C. and Kelling, E. (2013).
56.
Doucet, I.: Understanding social engagement in architecture. In: Karim, F. (ed.) The Routledge companion to architecture and social engagement. Routledge, New York, NY (2018).
57.
Luansang, C., Boonmahathanakorn, S., Domingo-Price, M.L.: The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia. Environment and Urbanization. 24, 497–512 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247812456125.
58.
Till, J.: Architecture of the Impure Community. In: Hill, J. (ed.) Occupying architecture: between the architect and the user. pp. 34–42. Routledge, London (1998).
59.
Cleaver, F.: Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development. In: Participation: The New Tyranny? pp. 36–55. Zed Books, London (2001).
60.
Forester, J.: Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from Facilitating Dialogue and Moderating Debate to Mediating Negotiations. Journal of the American Planning Association. 72, 447–456 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976765.
61.
Russell, B.: Radical municipalism: demanding the future, https://www.opendemocracy.net/plan-c/radical-municipalism-demanding-future.
62.
Siemiatycki, M.: The Role of the Planning Scholar. Journal of Planning Education and Research. 32, 147–159 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X12440729.
63.
Fraser, Nancy: Rethinking Recognition. New Left Review. 3, 1103–1124.
64.
Martens, K.: Participatory Experiments from the Bottom up: The role of environmental NGOs and citizen groups. European Journal of Spatial Development. 18, 1–20 (2005).
65.
Watson, V.: Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics. Planning Theory. 5, 31–50 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095206061020.
66.
Yacobi, H.: The NGOization of Space: Dilemmas of Social Change, Planning Policy, and the Israeli Public Sphere. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 25, 745–758 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1068/d459t.
67.
Yacobi, H., Ventura, J., Danzig, S.: Walls, enclaves and the (counter) politics of design. Journal of Urban Design. 21, 481–494 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1184566.
68.
John Forester: Listening: the social policy of everyday life in Planning in the Face of Power. University of California Press, Berkeley. In: Planning in the face of power. University of California Press, Berkeley (1989).
69.
Markus, T.A., Cameron, D.: Why language matters. In: The words between the spaces: buildings and language. pp. 1–17. Routledge, London (2002).
70.
Fenster, T.: Cognitive Temporal Mapping: The Three Steps Method in Urban Planning. Planning Theory & Practice. 10, 479–498 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903417266.
71.
Akhil Gupta and Ferguson, D.: Discipline and Practice:"The Field” As Site, Method, and Location In Anthropology. … locations: Boundaries and grounds of a ….
72.
McDowell, L (1992a), Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 17 399–416.
73.
Read, C., Earnest, J., Ali, M., Poonacha, V.: Applying a Practical, Participatory Action Research Framework for Producing Knowledge, Action and Change in Communities: A Health Case Study from Gujarat, Western India. In: Tiwari, R., Lommerse, M., and Smith, D. (eds.) M2 Models and Methodologies for Community Engagement. pp. 91–105. Springer Singapore, Singapore (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-11-8_6.
74.
Leivas, M.: From the body to the city: participatory action research with social cartography for transformative education and global citizenship. Educational Action Research. 1–16 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1519453.
75.
Amir, S.: Rethinking Design Policy in the Third World. Design Issues. 20, 68–75 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1162/0747936042311995.
76.
Komarova, M., McKnight, M.: ‘We Are Watching You Too’: Reflections on Doing Visual Research in a Contested City. Sociological Research Online. 18, (2013). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2877.
77.
Rose, G.: Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography. 21, 305–320 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122.
78.
Flowerdew, R., Martin, D.: Methods in human geography: a guide for students doing a research project. Prentice Hall, Harlow (2005).
79.
Hamdi, N.: Chapter 12. Insiders Out and Outsiders: Practical wisdom and the co-Production of Knowledge. In: The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. Routledge, New York, NY (2014).
80.
Mitlin, D., Bartlett, S.: Editorial: Co-production – key ideas. Environment and Urbanization. 30, 355–366 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818791931.
81.
Sarkissian, W. and Bunjamin-Mau, W. et al.: Designing and managing a workshop. In: SpeakOut: the step-by-step guide to SpeakOuts and community workshops. Earthscan, London (2009).
82.
Saba Golchehr: Data-driven design for civic participation : Introducing digital methods for on-going civic engagement for design in public space. 56–70. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110332-5.
83.
Burgess, J., Harrison, C.M., Limb, M.: People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the City. Urban Studies. 25, 455–473 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1080/00420988820080631.
84.
We Drew What We Imagined: Participatory Mapping Performance, and Arts of Landscape Making, • Sletto, B. I., (2009).
85.
Freire, P., Bergman Ramos, M.: Pedagogy of the oppressed. Penguin Books, London (1996).
86.
Haraway, D.: Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies. 14, (1988). https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
87.
SARA KINDON: Participatory Action Research: Origins, approaches and methods. 35–44. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203933671-13.
88.
Jeremy Till: Imperfect ethics. In: Architecture depends. pp. 171–187. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2009).
89.
Miessen, M.: Collaboration and the conflictual, Published in The nightmare of participation - p. 91-104. Presented at the (2010).
90.
Cooke, B., Kothari, U.: The case for participation as tyranny. In: Participation: the new tyranny? pp. 1–15. Zed Books, London (2001).
91.
Mouffe, C.: Agonistics: thinking the world politically. Verso, London (2013).
92.
Kaminer, T.: Theories of participation, theories of contestation. In: The efficacy of architecture: political contestation and agency. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2017).
93.
Moser, C.O.N.: Community participation in urban projects in the Third World. Progress in Planning. 32, 71–133 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-9006(89)90010-X.
94.
Sandercock, L.: Re/presenting Planning’s Histories. In: Towards cosmopolis: planning for multicultural cities. pp. 33–54. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1998).
95.
Yacobi, H.: Social Exclusion, Housing Environment and Tolerant Planning: The Case of the Jahelin Bedouin Tribe. Hagar - International Social Science Review. 69-84. Hagar international social science review = Hājir. 5, 69–83 (2004).
96.
Abu-Orf, H.: Is planning possible in cities divided by violent conflict? International Development Planning Review. 33, 321–342 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2011.16.
97.
Bower, R.: Architecture and space re-imagined: learning from the difference, multiplicity, and otherness of development practice. Routledge, New York (2017).
98.
Hamdi, N., Goethert, R.: Chapter 2. Action Planning In Theory. In: Action planning for cities: a guide to community practice. pp. 23–59. John Wiley, Chichester (1997).
99.
Hamdi, N.: Chapter 3. Deciding how to decide. In: The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. Routledge, New York, NY (2014).
100.
Hamdi, N.: Chapter 6. In Search of a Community and Structure of Place. In: Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. pp. 58–72. Earthscan, London (2004).
101.
Luck, R.: Learning to talk to users in participatory design situations. Design Studies. 28, 217–242 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.002.
102.
Environment and Urbanization.
103.
Camillo Boano and William Hunter: Collaboration and the conflictual. In: The nightmare of participation: [crossbench praxis as a mode of criticality]. pp. 91–104. Sternberg Press, Berlin (2010).
104.
Hamdi, N.: Chapter 7. Participation in practice. In: The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice. Routledge, New York, NY (2014).
105.
Petrescu, D., Chiles, P.: Agency: alternative practices and alternative worlds. Architectural Research Quarterly. 13, (2009). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135509990194.
106.
Hamdi, N.: Chapter 8. PEAS and the Sociable Side of Practice. In: The placemaker’s guide to building community. pp. 141–152. Earthscan, London (2010).
107.
Sandercock, L., Attili, G.: Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue. Planning Theory & Practice. 11, 23–45 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903538012.
108.
Hamdi, N.: Chapter 9. Reasoning to Scale. In: The placemaker’s guide to building community. pp. 160–153. Earthscan, London (2010).
109.
Hamdi, N.: Chapter 11. Governance and networks: organizing from inside out. In: Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. pp. 107–115. Earthscan, London (2004).
110.
Environment and Urbanization.
111.
Mitlin, D., Thompson, J.: Participatory approaches in urban areas: strengthening civil society or reinforcing the status quo? Environment and Urbanization. 7, 231–250 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789500700113.
112.
Petrescu, D., Petcou, C.: Tactics for a Transgressive Practice. Architectural Design. 83, 58–65 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1675.
113.
Mitlin, D., Satterthwaite, D.: Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction. Earthscan, London (2004).
114.
Cowan, R.: Placecheck: a user’s guide. , (2001).
115.
Robinson, J.: White women researching/representing ‘others’: from antiapartheid to postcolonialism? In: Writing women and space: colonial and postcolonial geographies. pp. 197–228. Guilford Press, New York (1994).
116.
Foucault, M.: The eye of power. In: Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. pp. 146–165. Longman, Harlow (1980).
117.
Burgess, R., Carmona, M., Kolstee, T.: Contemporary policies for enablement and participation : a critical review. In: The challenge of sustainable cities: neoliberalism and urban strategies in developing countries. pp. 138–162. Zed, London (1997).
118.
D. M. Petrescu, K. Trogal: The social (re)production of Architecture in ‘crisis-riddled’ times. In: Petrescu, D. and Trogal, K. (eds.) The social (re)production of architecture: politics, values and actions in contemporary practice. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London (2017). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717180.
119.
Jenkins, P., Smith, H., Wang, Y.P.: Post-1990 issues in planning and housing. In: Planning and housing in the rapidly urbanising world. pp. 178–203. Routledge, London (2007).
120.
Cooke, B., Kothari, U.: The case for participation as tyranny. In: Participation: the new tyranny? pp. 1–15. Zed Books, London (2001).
121.
Blunt, A., Dowling, R.M.: Setting up home: an introduction. In: Home. pp. 1–31. Routledge, London (2006).
122.
Lane, B.M.: What is home? In: Housing and dwelling: perspectives on modern domestic architecture. pp. 50–73. Routledge, Abingdon (2007).
123.
Coole, D.: Experiencing Discourse: Corporeal Communicators and the Embodiment of Power. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. 9, 413–433 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2006.00258.x.
124.
Kumar, S.: Conceptual specifications. In: Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners. pp. 23–52. Practical Action Publishing, Rugby (2002).
125.
Hamdi, N.: Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. Earthscan, London (2004).
126.
Sundberg, J.: Looking for the critical geographer, or why bodies and geographies matter to the emergence of critical geographies of Latin America. Geoforum. 36, 17–28 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.03.006.
127.
Swyngedouw, E., Wilson, J.: Insurgent architects and the spectral return of the urban political. In: Metzger, J., Allmendinger, P., and Oosterlynck, S. (eds.) Planning against the political: democratic deficits in European territorial governance. pp. 215–225. Routledge, New York (2015).
128.
Kindon, S.L., Pain, R., Kesby, M.: Participatory action research: origins, approaches and methods. In: Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place. pp. 9–18. Routledge, Abingdon (2007).
129.
Patel, S., Mitlin, D.: Grassroots-driven development: The alliance of SPARC, the National Slum Dwellers Federation and Mahila Milan. In: Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction. pp. 216–241. Earthscan, London (2004).
130.
Wates, N.: General principles A-Z. In: Community planning handbook : how people can shape their cities, towns and villages in any part of the world. pp. 11–21. Earthscan Publications Ltd, London (2000).
131.
Frediani, A.A., Boano, C.: Processes for just products: the capability space of participatory design. In: The capability approach, technology and design. pp. 203–222. Springer, Dordrecht (2012).
132.
Zetter, R.: Market enablement or sustainable development : the conflicting paradigms of urbanization. In: Planning in cities: sustainability and growth in the developing world. pp. 31–42. ITDG, London (2002).
133.
Cornwall, A., Coelho, V.S.P.: Spaces for change?: The politics of participation in new democratic arenas. In: Spaces for change?: the politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas. pp. 1–29. Zed, London (2007).
134.
Glass, J.: Facing the Future by Designing in Resilience: An Architectural Perspective. In: Hazards and the built environment: attaining built-in resilience. pp. 172–188. Routledge, Abingdon (2008).
135.
Seymour, W.: Exhuming the Body: Revisiting the Role of the Visible Body in Ethnographic Research. Qualitative Health Research. 17, 1188–1197 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307308517.
136.
Ramirez, R.: Integrated Informality in the Barrios of Havana. In: Rethinking the informal city: critical perspectives from Latin America. pp. 137–162. Berghahn Books, New York (2010).
137.
Turner, J.F.C.: Issues in Self-Help and Self-Managed Housing. In: Self-help housing: a critique. pp. 99–113. Mansell, London (1982).
138.
Madanipour, A.: Introduction. In: Whose public space?: international case studies in urban design and development. pp. 1–15. Routledge, London (2010).
139.
Dovey, K.: Home and homelessness. In: Home environments. pp. 33–64. Plenum Press, New York (1985).
140.
Eyben, R., Harris, C., Pettit, J.: Introduction: Exploring Power for Change. IDS Bulletin. 37, 1–10 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00318.x.
141.
Till, J.: Imperfect ethics. In: Architecture depends. pp. 171–187. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (2009).
142.
Schuermans, N., Newton, C.: Being a young and foreign researcher in South Africa: Towards a postcolonial dialogue. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography. 33, 295–300 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12005_4.
143.
Progress in Human Geography.
