A. Cuthbert, ‘Chapter  6:  Urban Design and Spatial Political Economy’, in Companion to Urban Design (Routledge, 2014) <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844434>
A. Escobar, ‘The Making and the Unmaking of the Third World through Development’, in The Post-Development Reader (London: Zed Books, 1996) <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=92a6b119-10d2-e811-80cd-005056af4099>
AbdouMaliq Simone , and  Edgar Pieterse, New Urban Worlds : Inhabiting Dissonant Times (Polity Press, 2017) <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/UCL/reader.action?docID=4983712&amp;ppg=173>
Abu-Orf, Hazem, ‘Is Planning Possible in Cities Divided by Violent Conflict?’, International Development Planning Review, 33.3 (2011), 321–42 <https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2011.16>
Akhil  Gupta and Ferguson, D., ‘Discipline and Practice:"The Field” As Site, Method, and Location In Anthropology’, …  Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a  … <http://www.academia.edu/252003/Discipline_and_Practice_The_Field_As_Site_Method_and_Location_In_Anthropology>
Al-Harithy, Howayda, ‘The Participative Discourse: Community Activism in Post-War Reconstruction.’, in Urban Design in the Arab World: Reconceptualizing Boundaries, ed. by Robert Saliba (Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate, 2015), Design and the built environment series, 39–50 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3d19f9c2-7c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Amir, Sulfikar, ‘Rethinking Design Policy in the Third World’, Design Issues, 20.4 (2004), 68–75 <https://doi.org/10.1162/0747936042311995>
Appadurai, A., ‘Deep Democracy: Urban Governmentality and the Horizon of Politics’, Environment and Urbanization, 13.2 (2001), 23–43 <https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780101300203>
Awan, Nishat, Tatjana Schneider, and Jeremy Till, ‘Chapter 3: The Operations of Spatial Agency’, in Spatial Agency: Other Ways of Doing Architecture (London: Routledge, 2011), pp. 69–82 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=491ebea7-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Barry, Janice, Megan Horst, Andy Inch, Crystal Legacy, Susmita Rishi, Juan J Rivero, and others, ‘Unsettling Planning Theory’, Planning Theory, 17.3 (2018), 418–38 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095218763842>
Bell, Bryan, and Katie Wakeford, Expanding Architecture: Design as Activism (New York: Metropolis Books, 2008)
Blundell Jones, Peter, Doina Petrescu, and Jeremy Till, eds., Architecture and Participation (London: Routledge, 2012) <http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203022863>
Blunt, Alison, and Robyn M Dowling, ‘Setting up Home: An Introduction’, in Home (London: Routledge, 2006), Key ideas in geography, 1–31 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=2394bfc2-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Boano, Camillo, and Giorgio Talocci, ‘Fences and Profanations: Questioning the Sacredness of Urban Design’, Journal of Urban Design, 19.5 (2014), 700–721 <https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.943701>
Bower, Richard, Architecture and Space Re-Imagined: Learning from the Difference, Multiplicity, and Otherness of Development Practice (New York: Routledge, 2017), Routledge Research in Place, Space and Politics <http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315678146>
Burgess, Jacquelin, Carolyn M. Harrison, and Melanie Limb, ‘People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the City’, Urban Studies, 25.6 (1988), 455–73 <https://doi.org/10.1080/00420988820080631>
Burgess, Rod, Marisa Carmona, and Theo Kolstee, ‘Contemporary Policies for Enablement and Participation : A Critical Review’, in The Challenge of Sustainable Cities: Neoliberalism and Urban Strategies in Developing Countries (London: Zed, 1997), pp. 138–62 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9c4bae9a-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Camillo Boano and William Hunter, ‘Collaboration and the Conflictual’, in The Nightmare of Participation: [Crossbench Praxis as a Mode of Criticality] (Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2010), pp. 91–104
Carabelli, Giulia, ‘Grassroots Movements and the Production of (Other) Space(s) - Published in The Divided City and the Grassroots: The (Un)Making of Ethnic Divisions in Mostar’ (Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018) <http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&amp;package_service_id=3192314340004761&amp;institutionId=4761&amp;customerId=4760>
———, The Divided City and the Grassroots: The (Un)Making of Ethnic Divisions in Mostar (Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018) <http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3192314340004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760>
Catalina Ortiz and Camillo Boano, ‘The Medellín’s Shifting Geopolitics of Informality : The Encircled Garden as a Dispositive of Civil Disenfranchisement?’, pp. 189–207 <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315659275-16>
Choguill, Marisa B.Guaraldo, ‘A Ladder of Community Participation for Underdeveloped Countries’, Habitat International, 20.3 (1996), 431–44 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-3975(96)00020-3>
Cleaver, F., ‘Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development’, in Participation: The New Tyranny? (London: Zed Books, 2001), pp. 36–55
Cooke, Bill, and Uma Kothari, ‘The Case for Participation as Tyranny’, in Participation: The New Tyranny? (London: Zed Books, 2001), pp. 1–15 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c4bd2ae2-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
———, ‘The Case for Participation as Tyranny’, in Participation: The New Tyranny? (London: Zed Books, 2001), pp. 1–15 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c4bd2ae2-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Coole, Diana, ‘Experiencing Discourse: Corporeal Communicators and the Embodiment of Power’, The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9.3 (2007), 413–33 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2006.00258.x>
Cornwall, A, and V S P Coelho, ‘Spaces for Change?: The Politics of Participation in New Democratic Arenas’, in Spaces for Change?: The Politics of Citizen Participation in New Democratic Arenas (London: Zed, 2007), Claiming citizenship, 1–29 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=722bea86-8336-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Cornwall, Andrea, ‘Historical Perspectives on Participation in Development’, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 44.1 (2006), 62–83 <https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040600624460>
Cowan, Rob, ‘Placecheck: A User’s Guide. ’ (Urban Design Alliance , 2001)
D. M. Petrescu and K. Trogal, ‘The Social (Re)Production of Architecture in “Crisis-Riddled” Times’, in The Social (Re)Production of Architecture: Politics, Values and Actions in Contemporary Practice, ed. by Doina Petrescu and Kim Trogal (London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2017) <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717180>
Derickson, Kate Driscoll, ‘On the Politics of Recognition in Critical Urban Scholarship’, Urban Geography, 37.6 (2016), 824–29 <https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1105483>
Doreen Massey, ‘Politics and Space/Time’, New Left Review, 196 (1992) <https://newleftreview.org/I/196/doreen-massey-politics-and-space-time>
Doucet, Isabelle, ‘Understanding Social Engagement in Architecture’, in The Routledge Companion to Architecture and Social Engagement, ed. by Farhan Karim (New York, NY: Routledge, 2018) <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3a3e354f-f5fd-e811-80cd-005056af4099>
Dovey, K, ‘Home and Homelessness’, in Home Environments (New York: Plenum Press, 1985), Human behavior and environment, 33–64 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8e4fc2f6-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
‘Environment and Urbanization’ <http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/eau>
‘———’ <http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/eau>
Erfan, Aftab, ‘Confronting Collective Traumas: An Exploration of Therapeutic Planning’, Planning Theory & Practice, 18.1 (2017), 34–50 <https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1249909>
Eyben, Rosalind, Colette Harris, and Jethro Pettit, ‘Introduction: Exploring Power for Change’, IDS Bulletin, 37.6 (2006), 1–10 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00318.x>
Fawaz, Mona, ‘Hezbollah as Urban Planner? Questions To and From Planning Theory’, Planning Theory, 8.4 (2009), 323–34 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209341327>
Fenster, Tovi, ‘Cognitive Temporal Mapping: The Three Steps Method in Urban Planning’, Planning Theory & Practice, 10.4 (2009), 479–98 <https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903417266>
Flowerdew, Robin, and David Martin, Methods in Human Geography: A Guide for Students Doing a Research Project, 2nd ed (Harlow: Prentice Hall, 2005) <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&amp;isbn=9781405898416>
Forester, John, ‘Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from Facilitating Dialogue and Moderating Debate to Mediating Negotiations’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 72.4 (2006), 447–56 <https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976765>
Foucault, Michel, ‘The Eye of Power’, in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977 (Harlow: Longman, 1980), pp. 146–65
Fraser, Nancy, ‘Rethinking Recognition’, New Left Review, 3, 1103–24 <https://newleftreview.org/II/3/nancy-fraser-rethinking-recognition>
Frediani, Alex, and Camillo Boano, ‘Processes for Just Products: The Capability Space of Participatory Design’, in The Capability Approach, Technology and Design (London: Springer, 2012) <https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-94-007-3879-9>
Frediani, Alexandre Apsan, ‘Re-Imagining Participatory Design: Reflecting on the ASF-UK Change by Design Methodology’, Design Issues, 32.3 (2016), 98–111 <https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00403>
Frediani, Apsan A, and Camillo Boano, ‘Processes for Just Products: The Capability Space of Participatory Design’, in The Capability Approach, Technology and Design (Dordrecht: Springer, 2012), Philosophy of engineering and technology, 203–22 <https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-94-007-3879-9>
Freire, Paulo, and Myra Bergman Ramos, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, New revised edition (London: Penguin Books, 1996)
Gaventa, John, and Gregory Barrett, ‘So What Difference Does It Make? Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement’, IDS Working Papers, 2010.347 (2010), 01–72 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00347_2.x>
Glass, J., ‘Facing the Future by Designing in Resilience: An Architectural Perspective’, in Hazards and the Built Environment: Attaining Built-in Resilience (Abingdon: Routledge, 2008), pp. 172–88 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ad954536-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Hamdi, N., ‘Chapter 9. Reasoning to Scale’, in The Placemaker’s Guide to Building Community (London: Earthscan, 2010), Tools for community planning, 160–153
Hamdi, Nabeel, ‘Chapter 3. Deciding How to Decide’, in The Spacemaker’s Guide to Big Change: Design and Improvisation in Development Practice (New York, NY: Routledge, 2014), Earthscan tools for community planning <http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315>
———, ‘Chapter 6. In Search of a Community and Structure of Place’, in Small Change: The Art of Practice and the Limits of Planning in Cities (London: Earthscan, 2004), pp. 58–72
———, ‘Chapter 7. Participation in Practice’, in The Spacemaker’s Guide to Big Change: Design and Improvisation in Development Practice (New York, NY: Routledge, 2014), Earthscan tools for community planning <http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315>
———, ‘Chapter 8. PEAS and the Sociable Side of Practice’, in The Placemaker’s Guide to Building Community (London: Earthscan, 2010), Tools for community planning, 141–52
———, ‘Chapter 11. Governance and Networks: Organizing from inside Out’, in Small Change: The Art of Practice and the Limits of Planning in Cities (London: Earthscan, 2004), pp. 107–15
———, ‘Chapter 12. Insiders Out and Outsiders: Practical Wisdom and the Co-Production of Knowledge’, in The Spacemaker’s Guide to Big Change: Design and Improvisation in Development Practice (New York, NY: Routledge, 2014), Earthscan tools for community planning <http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315>
———, Small Change: The Art of Practice and the Limits of Planning in Cities (London: Earthscan, 2004)
Hamdi, Nabeel, and Reinhard Goethert, ‘Chapter 2. Action Planning In Theory’, in Action Planning for Cities: A Guide to Community Practice (Chichester: John Wiley, 1997), pp. 23–59
Haraway, Donna, ‘Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective’, Feminist Studies, 14.3 (1988) <https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066>
Hickey, Samuel, and Giles Mohan, ‘Towards Participation as Transformation: Critical Themes and Challenges’, in Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? : Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development (London: Zed, 2004), pp. 3–24 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=1893885c-8336-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Hirst, Paul Q., Space and Power: Politics, War and Architecture (Cambridge: Polity, 2005)
Hou, Jeffrey, ‘Citizen Design: Participation and Beyond.’, in Companion to Urban Design (Routledge, 2014) <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844434.ch25>
Irazábal, C., ‘Public, Private, People Partnerships (PPPPs): Reflections from Latin American Cases’, in Private Communities and Urban Governance: Theoretical and Comparative Perspectives, ed. by Amnon Lehavi (Switzerland: Springer, 2016), pp. 191–214 <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;AuthType=ip,shib&amp;db=nlebk&amp;AN=1224661&amp;site=ehost-live&amp;scope=site>
Jenkins, Paul, Harry Smith, and Ya Ping Wang, ‘Post-1990 Issues in Planning and Housing’, in Planning and Housing in the Rapidly Urbanising World (London: Routledge, 2007), Housing, planning, and design series, 178–203 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ee5bfbd5-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Jeremy Till, ‘Imperfect Ethics’, in Architecture Depends (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2009), pp. 171–87 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=730082ec-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
John Forester, ‘Listening: The Social Policy of Everyday Life in Planning in the Face of Power. University of California Press, Berkeley’, in Planning in the Face of Power (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1989) <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a080e248-73f4-e711-80cd-005056af4099>
Kaminer, T., ‘Theories of Participation, Theories of Contestation’, in The Efficacy of Architecture: Political Contestation and Agency (Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2017)
Kindon, Sara Louise, Rachel Pain, and Mike Kesby, ‘Participatory Action Research: Origins, Approaches and Methods’, in Participatory Action Research Approaches and Methods: Connecting People, Participation and Place (Abingdon: Routledge, 2007), Routledge studies in human geography, 9–18 <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781134135561>
Komarova, Milena, and Martina McKnight, ‘“We Are Watching You Too”: Reflections on Doing Visual Research in a Contested City’, Sociological Research Online, 18.1 (2013) <https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2877>
Kumar, Somesh, ‘Conceptual Specifications’, in Methods for Community Participation: A Complete Guide for Practitioners (Rugby: Practical Action Publishing, 2002), pp. 23–52 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ca0786a4-8836-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Lahoud, Adrian, ‘Post-Traumatic Urbanism’, Architectural Design, 80.5 (2010), 14–23 <https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1128>
Lane, Barbara Miller, ‘What Is Home?’, in Housing and Dwelling: Perspectives on Modern Domestic Architecture (Abingdon: Routledge, 2007), pp. 50–73 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f87a55cc-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Laura Roth, and Kate Shea Baird, ‘Municipalism and the Feminization of Politics’ (ROAR Magazine) <https://roarmag.org/magazine/municipalism-feminization-urban-politics/>
Lee, Yanki, ‘Design Participation Tactics: The Challenges and New Roles for Designers in the Co-Design Process’, CoDesign, 4.1 (2008), 31–50 <https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875613>
Leivas, Monique, ‘From the Body to the City: Participatory Action Research with Social Cartography for Transformative Education and Global Citizenship’, Educational Action Research, 2018, 1–16 <https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1519453>
Loo, S., ‘Design-Ing Ethics: The Good, the Bad and the Performative’, in Design and Ethics: Reflections on Practice (London: Routledge, 2012) <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f6e15cf3-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Luansang, C., S. Boonmahathanakorn, and M. L. Domingo-Price, ‘The Role of Community Architects in Upgrading; Reflecting on the Experience in Asia’, Environment and Urbanization, 24.2 (2012), 497–512 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247812456125>
Luansang, Chawanad, Supawut Boonmahathanakorn, and Maria Lourdes Domingo-Price, ‘The Role of Community Architects in Upgrading; Reflecting on the Experience in Asia’, Environment and Urbanization, 24.2 (2012), 497–512 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247812456125>
Luck, Rachael, ‘Learning to Talk to Users in Participatory Design Situations’, Design Studies, 28.3 (2007), 217–42 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.002>
Madanipour, Ali, ‘Introduction’, in Whose Public Space?: International Case Studies in Urban Design and Development (London: Routledge, 2010), pp. 1–15 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=e4a879a0-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Marcuse, Peter, ‘From Critical Urban Theory to the Right to the City’, City, 13.2–3 (2009), 185–97 <https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982177>
Markus, Thomas A., and Deborah Cameron, ‘Why Language Matters’, in The Words between the Spaces: Buildings and Language (London: Routledge, 2002), The architext series, 1–17 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9f5a20ed-8b33-e911-80cd-005056af4099>
Martens, Karel, ‘Participatory Experiments from the Bottom up: The Role of Environmental NGOs and Citizen Groups’, European Journal of Spatial Development, 18 (2005), 1–20 <https://archive.nordregio.se/European-Journal-of-Spatial-Development/Archive/2005/index.html>
Martin, Deborah, Eugene McCann, and Mark Purcell, ‘Space, Scale, Governance, and Representation: Contemporary Geographical Perspectives on Urban Politics and Policy’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 25.2 (2003), 113–21 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9906.t01-1-00001>
Mattila, Hanna, ‘Aesthetic Justice and Urban Planning: Who Ought to Have the Right to Design Cities?’, GeoJournal, 58.2/3 (2002), 131–38 <https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010832.88129.cc>
‘McDowell, L (1992a), Doing Gender: Feminism, Feminists and Research Methods in Human Geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 17 399–416’ <http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/pdf/Doing_Gender.pdf>
McFarlane, Colin, ‘Knowledge, Learning and Development: A Post-Rationalist Approach’, Progress in Development Studies, 6.4 (2006), 287–305 <https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993406ps144oa>
Miessen, Markus, ‘Collaboration and the Conflictual, Published in The Nightmare of Participation - p. 91-104’ (Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2010)
Miraftab, F., ‘Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship: The Story of Western Cape Anti-Eviction Campaign in South Africa’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25.2 (2005), 200–217 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05282182>
Miraftab, Faranak, ‘Making Neo-Liberal Governance: The Disempowering Work of Empowerment’, International Planning Studies, 9.4 (2004), 239–59 <https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470500050130>
Mitlin, D., ‘With and beyond the State -- Co-Production as a Route to Political Influence, Power and Transformation for Grassroots Organizations’, Environment and Urbanization, 20.2 (2008), 339–60 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247808096117>
Mitlin, D., and J. Thompson, ‘Participatory Approaches in Urban Areas: Strengthening Civil Society or        Reinforcing the Status Quo?’, Environment and Urbanization, 7.1 (1995), 231–50 <https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789500700113>
Mitlin, Diana, and Sheridan Bartlett, ‘Editorial: Co-Production – Key Ideas’, Environment and Urbanization, 30.2 (2018), 355–66 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818791931>
Mitlin, Diana, and David Satterthwaite, Empowering Squatter Citizen: Local Government, Civil Society and Urban Poverty Reduction (London: Earthscan, 2004)
Moser, Caroline O.N., ‘Community Participation in Urban Projects in the Third World’, Progress in Planning, 32 (1989), 71–133 <https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-9006(89)90010-X>
Mouffe, Chantal, Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically (London: Verso, 2013)
Mukhija, Vinit, ‘Urban Design for a Planet of Informal Cities’, in Companion to Urban Design (Routledge, 2014) <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844434.ch43>
Patel, Sheela, and Diana Mitlin, ‘Grassroots-Driven Development: The Alliance of SPARC, the National Slum Dwellers Federation and Mahila Milan’, in Empowering Squatter Citizen: Local Government, Civil Society and Urban Poverty Reduction (London: Earthscan, 2004), pp. 216–41 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=5b1d1c38-8436-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Petrescu, Doina, and Prue Chiles, ‘Agency: Alternative Practices and Alternative Worlds’, Architectural Research Quarterly, 13.02 (2009) <https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135509990194>
Petrescu, Doina, and Constantin Petcou, ‘Tactics for a Transgressive Practice’, Architectural Design, 83.6 (2013), 58–65 <https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1675>
Petrescu, Doina, Constantin Petcou, and Corelia Baibarac, ‘Co-Producing Commons-Based Resilience: Lessons from R-Urban’, Building Research & Information, 44.7 (2016), 717–36 <https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1214891>
‘Progress in Human Geography’ <https://search.proquest.com/publication/37137>
Ramirez, R., ‘Integrated Informality in the Barrios of Havana’, in Rethinking the Informal City: Critical Perspectives from Latin America (New York: Berghahn Books, 2010), Remapping cultural history, 137–62 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=222f22f0-8536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Read, Clancy, Jaya Earnest, Mohammed Ali, and Veena Poonacha, ‘Applying a Practical, Participatory Action Research Framework for Producing Knowledge, Action and Change in Communities: A Health Case Study from Gujarat, Western India’, in M2 Models and Methodologies for Community Engagement, ed. by Reena Tiwari, Marina Lommerse, and Dianne Smith (Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2014), pp. 91–105 <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-11-8_6>
Rendell, Jane, ‘Only Resist: Five Particular Qualities Might Characterise a Specifically Feminist Approach to Critical Spatial Practice, Suggests Jane Rendell.’, Architectural Review, 243.1449 (2018), 8–18 <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;AuthType=ip,shib&amp;db=asu&amp;AN=128870014&amp;site=ehost-live&amp;scope=site>
Rios, Michael, ‘Envisioning Citizenship: Toward a Polity Approach in Urban Design’, Journal of Urban Design, 13.2 (2008), 213–29 <https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800801965692>
Robinson, J., ‘White Women Researching/Representing “Others”: From Antiapartheid to Postcolonialism?’, in Writing Women and Space: Colonial and Postcolonial Geographies (New York: Guilford Press, 1994), Mappings, 197–228
Rolnik, Raquel, ‘Place, Inhabitance and Citizenship: The Right to Housing and the Right to the City in the Contemporary Urban World’, International Journal of Housing Policy, 14.3 (2014), 293–300 <https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2014.936178>
Rose, G., ‘Situating Knowledges: Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics’, Progress in Human Geography, 21.3 (1997), 305–20 <https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122>
Roy, Ananya, ‘Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai’, Antipode, 41.1 (2009), 159–79 <https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00660.x>
———, ‘Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory?’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40.1 (2016), 200–209 <https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12274>
Russell, Bertie, ‘Radical Municipalism: Demanding the Future’ (openDemocracy, 2017) <https://www.opendemocracy.net/plan-c/radical-municipalism-demanding-future>
Saba Golchehr, ‘Data-Driven Design for Civic Participation : Introducing Digital Methods for on-Going Civic Engagement for Design in Public Space’, 56–70 <https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110332-5>
Sandercock, Leonie, ‘Re/Presenting Planning’s Histories’, in Towards Cosmopolis: Planning for Multicultural Cities (Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1998), pp. 33–54 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a57f9aa3-151e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d>
Sandercock, Leonie, and Giovanni Attili, ‘Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue’, Planning Theory & Practice, 11.1 (2010), 23–45 <https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903538012>
Sanoff, Henry, ‘Multiple Views of Participatory Design’, International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 2.1 (2014), 57–69 <http://www.archnet-ijar.net/index.php/IJAR/article/view/177>
SARA KINDON, ‘Participatory Action Research: Origins, Approaches and Methods’, 35–44 <https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203933671-13>
Sarkissian, W. and Bunjamin-Mau, W. et al., ‘Designing and Managing a Workshop’, in SpeakOut: The Step-by-Step Guide to SpeakOuts and Community Workshops (London: Earthscan, 2009), Tools for community planning <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=55416db3-8436-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Schindler, Seth, ‘Towards a Paradigm of Southern Urbanism’, City, 21.1 (2017), 47–64 <https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2016.1263494>
Schuermans, Nick, and Caroline Newton, ‘Being a Young and Foreign Researcher in South Africa: Towards a Postcolonial Dialogue’, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 33.3 (2012), 295–300 <https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12005_4>
Seymour, W., ‘Exhuming the Body: Revisiting the Role of the Visible Body in Ethnographic Research’, Qualitative Health Research, 17.9 (2007), 1188–97 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307308517>
Siemiatycki, Matti, ‘The Role of the Planning Scholar’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32.2 (2012), 147–59 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X12440729>
de Souza, Marcelo Lopes, ‘Together with the State, despite the State, against the State. Social Movements as “Critical Urban Planning” Agents’, City, 10.3 (2006), 327–42 <https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810600982347>
Sun, Xiaoyi, and Ronggui Huang, ‘Spatial Meaning-Making and Urban Activism: Two Tales of Anti-PX Protests in Urban China’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 2018, 1–21 <https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1443010>
Sundberg, Juanita, ‘Looking for the Critical Geographer, or Why Bodies and Geographies Matter to the Emergence of Critical Geographies of Latin America’, Geoforum, 36.1 (2005), 17–28 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.03.006>
Swyngedouw, Erik, and Japhy Wilson, ‘Insurgent Architects and the Spectral Return of the Urban Political’, in Planning against the Political: Democratic Deficits in European Territorial Governance, ed. by Jonathan Metzger, Philip Allmendinger, and Stijn Oosterlynck (New York: Routledge, 2015), pp. 215–25 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=20930d20-33c9-e711-80cd-005056af4099>
Thomas Abbot, Roxana Aslan, Riley O’Brien and Nathan Serafin, ‘Embrace Abolitionist Planning to Fight Trumpism’ (Progressive City) <https://www.progressivecity.net/single-post/2018/04/06/EMBRACE-ABOLITIONIST-PLANNING-TO-FIGHT-TRUMPISM>
Till, Jeremy, ‘Architecture of the Impure Community’, in Occupying Architecture: Between the Architect and the User, ed. by Jonathan Hill (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 34–42 <http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203983829>
———, ‘Imperfect Ethics’, in Architecture Depends (Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2009), pp. 171–87 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=730082ec-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Turner, J. F. C., ‘Issues in Self-Help and Self-Managed Housing’, in Self-Help Housing: A Critique (London: Mansell, 1982), pp. 99–113 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c2ed8bb4-6536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>
Umemoto, Kare, ‘Walking in Another’s Shoes’, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21.1 (2001), 17–31 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0102100102>
‘View of Toward an Architecture of Dissensus: Participatory Urbanism in South-East Asia - Boano, C. and Kelling, E. (2013)’ <https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/Boano/945>
Wahby, Noura, ‘Institutions and Populism in the Global South-Lessons for the Brexit-Trump Era’, City & Community, 16.2 (2017), 139–44 <https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12234>
Wates, Nick, ‘General Principles A-Z’, in Community Planning Handbook : How People Can Shape Their Cities, Towns and Villages in Any Part of the World (London: Earthscan Publications Ltd, 2000), pp. 11–21
Watson, V., ‘Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues’, Urban Studies, 46.11 (2009), 2259–75 <https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342598>
Watson, Vanessa, ‘Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics’, Planning Theory, 5.1 (2006), 31–50 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095206061020>
‘We Drew What We Imagined: Participatory Mapping Performance, and Arts of Landscape Making, • Sletto, B. I., (2009)’ <http://www.iapad.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Sletto_CA_August_20091.pdf>
Winkler, Tanja, ‘Black Texts on White Paper: Learning to                              Resistant Texts as an Approach towards Decolonising Planning’, Planning Theory, 2017 <https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095217739335>
Yacobi, Haim, ‘Social Exclusion, Housing Environment and Tolerant Planning: The Case of the Jahelin Bedouin Tribe. Hagar - International Social Science Review. 69-84’, Hagar International Social Science Review = Hājir, 5.1 (2004), 69–83
———, ‘The NGOization of Space: Dilemmas of Social Change, Planning Policy, and the Israeli Public Sphere’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25.4 (2007), 745–58 <https://doi.org/10.1068/d459t>
Yacobi, Haim, Jonathan Ventura, and Sharon Danzig, ‘Walls, Enclaves and the (Counter) Politics of Design’, Journal of Urban Design, 21.4 (2016), 481–94 <https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1184566>
Zetter, Roger, ‘Market Enablement or Sustainable Development : The Conflicting Paradigms of Urbanization’, in Planning in Cities: Sustainability and Growth in the Developing World (London: ITDG, 2002), Urban management series, 31–42 <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=bea9ee93-8836-e711-80c9-005056af4099>