A. Cuthbert. (2014). Chapter 6: Urban Design and Spatial Political Economy. In Companion to Urban Design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844434
A. Escobar. (1996). The making and the unmaking of the third world through development. In The post-development reader. Zed Books. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=92a6b119-10d2-e811-80cd-005056af4099
AbdouMaliq Simone , and Edgar Pieterse. (2017). New Urban Worlds : Inhabiting Dissonant Times. Polity Press. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/UCL/reader.action?docID=4983712&ppg=173
Abu-Orf, H. (2011). Is planning possible in cities divided by violent conflict? International Development Planning Review, 33(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.3828/idpr.2011.16
Akhil Gupta and Ferguson, D. (n.d.). Discipline and Practice:"The Field” As Site, Method, and Location In Anthropology. … Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a …. http://www.academia.edu/252003/Discipline_and_Practice_The_Field_As_Site_Method_and_Location_In_Anthropology
Al-Harithy, H. (2015). The participative discourse: community activism in post-war reconstruction. In R. Saliba (Ed.), Urban design in the Arab world: reconceptualizing boundaries: Vol. Design and the built environment series (pp. 39–50). Ashgate. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=3d19f9c2-7c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Amir, S. (2004). Rethinking Design Policy in the Third World. Design Issues, 20(4), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.1162/0747936042311995
Appadurai, A. (2001). Deep democracy: urban governmentality and the horizon of politics. Environment and Urbanization, 13(2), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780101300203
Awan, N., Schneider, T., & Till, J. (2011). Chapter 3: The operations of spatial agency. In Spatial agency: other ways of doing architecture (pp. 69–82). Routledge. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=491ebea7-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Barry, J., Horst, M., Inch, A., Legacy, C., Rishi, S., Rivero, J. J., Taufen, A., Zanotto, J. M., & Zitcer, A. (2018). Unsettling planning theory. Planning Theory, 17(3), 418–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095218763842
Bell, B., & Wakeford, K. (2008). Expanding architecture: design as activism. Metropolis Books.
Blundell Jones, P., Petrescu, D., & Till, J. (Eds.). (2012). Architecture and participation. Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203022863
Blunt, A., & Dowling, R. M. (2006). Setting up home: an introduction. In Home: Vol. Key ideas in geography (pp. 1–31). Routledge. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=2394bfc2-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Boano, C., & Talocci, G. (2014). Fences and Profanations: Questioning the Sacredness of Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design, 19(5), 700–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.943701
Bower, R. (2017). Architecture and space re-imagined: learning from the difference, multiplicity, and otherness of development practice: Vol. Routledge Research in Place, Space and Politics. Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315678146
Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M., & Limb, M. (1988). People, Parks and the Urban Green: A Study of Popular Meanings and Values for Open Spaces in the City. Urban Studies, 25(6), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420988820080631
Burgess, R., Carmona, M., & Kolstee, T. (1997). Contemporary policies for enablement and participation : a critical review. In The challenge of sustainable cities: neoliberalism and urban strategies in developing countries (pp. 138–162). Zed. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=9c4bae9a-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Camillo Boano and William Hunter. (2010). Collaboration and the conflictual. In The nightmare of participation: [crossbench praxis as a mode of criticality] (pp. 91–104). Sternberg Press.
Carabelli, G. (2018a). Grassroots Movements and the Production of (Other) Space(s) - published in The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. Palgrave Macmillan. http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3192314340004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
Carabelli, G. (2018b). The divided city and the grassroots: the (un)making of ethnic divisions in Mostar. Palgrave Macmillan. http://ucl.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=3192314340004761&institutionId=4761&customerId=4760
Catalina Ortiz and Camillo Boano. (n.d.). The Medellín’s shifting geopolitics of informality : The Encircled Garden as a dispositive of civil disenfranchisement? (pp. 189–207). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315659275-16
Choguill, M. B. G. (1996). A ladder of community participation for underdeveloped countries. Habitat International, 20(3), 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-3975(96)00020-3
Cleaver, F. (2001). Institutions, Agency and the Limitations of Participatory Approaches to Development. In Participation: The New Tyranny? (pp. 36–55). Zed Books.
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001a). The case for participation as tyranny. In Participation: the new tyranny? (pp. 1–15). Zed Books. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c4bd2ae2-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001b). The case for participation as tyranny. In Participation: the new tyranny? (pp. 1–15). Zed Books. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c4bd2ae2-8a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Coole, D. (2007). Experiencing Discourse: Corporeal Communicators and the Embodiment of Power. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(3), 413–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-856X.2006.00258.x
Cornwall, A. (2006). Historical perspectives on participation in development. Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, 44(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14662040600624460
Cornwall, A., & Coelho, V. S. P. (2007). Spaces for change?: The politics of participation in new democratic arenas. In Spaces for change?: the politics of citizen participation in new democratic arenas: Vol. Claiming citizenship (pp. 1–29). Zed. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=722bea86-8336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Cowan, R. (2001). Placecheck: a user’s guide. . Urban Design Alliance .
D. M. Petrescu & K. Trogal. (2017). The social (re)production of Architecture in ‘crisis-riddled’ times. In D. Petrescu & K. Trogal (Eds.), The social (re)production of architecture: politics, values and actions in contemporary practice. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315717180
de Souza, M. L. (2006). Together with the state, despite the state, against the state. Social Movements as ‘Critical Urban Planning’ Agents. City, 10(3), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810600982347
Derickson, K. D. (2016). On the politics of recognition in critical urban scholarship. Urban Geography, 37(6), 824–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/02723638.2015.1105483
Doreen Massey. (1992). Politics and Space/Time. New Left Review, 196. https://newleftreview.org/I/196/doreen-massey-politics-and-space-time
Doucet, I. (2018). Understanding social engagement in architecture. In F. Karim (Ed.), The Routledge companion to architecture and social engagement. Routledge. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=3a3e354f-f5fd-e811-80cd-005056af4099
Dovey, K. (1985). Home and homelessness. In Home environments: Vol. Human behavior and environment (pp. 33–64). Plenum Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8e4fc2f6-4f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Environment and Urbanization. (n.d.-a). http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/eau
Environment and Urbanization. (n.d.-b). http://journals.sagepub.com/loi/eau
Erfan, A. (2017). Confronting collective traumas: an exploration of therapeutic planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 18(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1249909
Eyben, R., Harris, C., & Pettit, J. (2006). Introduction: Exploring Power for Change. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00318.x
Fawaz, M. (2009). Hezbollah as Urban Planner? Questions To and From Planning Theory. Planning Theory, 8(4), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095209341327
Fenster, T. (2009). Cognitive Temporal Mapping: The Three Steps Method in Urban Planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 10(4), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903417266
Flowerdew, R., & Martin, D. (2005). Methods in human geography: a guide for students doing a research project (2nd ed). Prentice Hall. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9781405898416
Forester, J. (2006). Making Participation Work When Interests Conflict: Moving from Facilitating Dialogue and Moderating Debate to Mediating Negotiations. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72(4), 447–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360608976765
Foucault, M. (1980). The eye of power. In Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977 (pp. 146–165). Longman.
Fraser, Nancy. (n.d.). Rethinking Recognition. New Left Review, 3, 1103–1124. https://newleftreview.org/II/3/nancy-fraser-rethinking-recognition
Frediani, A. A. (2016). Re-imagining Participatory Design: Reflecting on the ASF-UK Change by Design Methodology. Design Issues, 32(3), 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1162/DESI_a_00403
Frediani, A. A., & Boano, C. (2012). Processes for just products: the capability space of participatory design. In The capability approach, technology and design: Vol. Philosophy of engineering and technology (pp. 203–222). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-94-007-3879-9
Frediani, A., & Boano, C. (2012). Processes for Just Products: the Capability Space of Participatory Design. In The capability approach, technology and design. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-94-007-3879-9
Freire, P., & Bergman Ramos, M. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed (New revised edition). Penguin Books.
Gaventa, J., & Barrett, G. (2010). So What Difference Does it Make? Mapping the Outcomes of Citizen Engagement. IDS Working Papers, 2010(347), 01–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2040-0209.2010.00347_2.x
Glass, J. (2008). Facing the Future by Designing in Resilience: An Architectural Perspective. In Hazards and the built environment: attaining built-in resilience (pp. 172–188). Routledge. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ad954536-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Hamdi, N. (2004a). Chapter 6. In Search of a Community and Structure of Place. In Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities (pp. 58–72). Earthscan.
Hamdi, N. (2004b). Chapter 11. Governance and networks: organizing from inside out. In Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities (pp. 107–115). Earthscan.
Hamdi, N. (2004c). Small change: the art of practice and the limits of planning in cities. Earthscan.
Hamdi, N. (2010a). Chapter 8. PEAS and the Sociable Side of Practice. In The placemaker’s guide to building community: Vol. Tools for community planning (pp. 141–152). Earthscan.
Hamdi, N. (2010b). Chapter 9. Reasoning to Scale. In The placemaker’s guide to building community: Vol. Tools for community planning (pp. 160–153). Earthscan.
Hamdi, N. (2014a). Chapter 3. Deciding how to decide. In The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice: Vol. Earthscan tools for community planning. Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315
Hamdi, N. (2014b). Chapter 7. Participation in practice. In The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice: Vol. Earthscan tools for community planning. Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315
Hamdi, N. (2014c). Chapter 12. Insiders Out and Outsiders: Practical wisdom and the co-Production of Knowledge. In The spacemaker’s guide to big change: design and improvisation in development practice: Vol. Earthscan tools for community planning. Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315773315
Hamdi, N., & Goethert, R. (1997). Chapter 2. Action Planning In Theory. In Action planning for cities: a guide to community practice (pp. 23–59). John Wiley.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066
Hickey, S., & Mohan, G. (2004). Towards Participation as Transformation: Critical Themes and Challenges. In Participation: from tyranny to transformation? : exploring new approaches to participation in development (pp. 3–24). Zed. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=1893885c-8336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Hirst, P. Q. (2005). Space and power: politics, war and architecture. Polity.
Hou, J. (2014). Citizen Design: participation and beyond. In Companion to Urban Design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844434.ch25
Irazábal, C. (2016). Public, Private, People Partnerships (PPPPs): Reflections from Latin American Cases. In A. Lehavi (Ed.), Private communities and urban governance: theoretical and comparative perspectives (pp. 191–214). Springer. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1224661&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Jenkins, P., Smith, H., & Wang, Y. P. (2007). Post-1990 issues in planning and housing. In Planning and housing in the rapidly urbanising world: Vol. Housing, planning, and design series (pp. 178–203). Routledge. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ee5bfbd5-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Jeremy Till. (2009). Imperfect ethics. In Architecture depends (pp. 171–187). MIT Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=730082ec-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
John Forester. (1989). Listening: the social policy of everyday life in Planning in the Face of Power. University of California Press, Berkeley. In Planning in the face of power. University of California Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a080e248-73f4-e711-80cd-005056af4099
Kaminer, T. (2017). Theories of participation, theories of contestation. In The efficacy of architecture: political contestation and agency. Routledge.
Kindon, S. L., Pain, R., & Kesby, M. (2007). Participatory action research: origins, approaches and methods. In Participatory action research approaches and methods: connecting people, participation and place: Vol. Routledge studies in human geography (pp. 9–18). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781134135561
Komarova, M., & McKnight, M. (2013). ‘We Are Watching You Too’: Reflections on Doing Visual Research in a Contested City. Sociological Research Online, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2877
Kumar, S. (2002). Conceptual specifications. In Methods for community participation: a complete guide for practitioners (pp. 23–52). Practical Action Publishing. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ca0786a4-8836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Lahoud, A. (2010). Post-Traumatic Urbanism. Architectural Design, 80(5), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1128
Lane, B. M. (2007). What is home? In Housing and dwelling: perspectives on modern domestic architecture (pp. 50–73). Routledge. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f87a55cc-9536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Laura Roth, & Kate Shea Baird. (n.d.-a). Municipalism and the Feminization of Politics. ROAR Magazine. https://roarmag.org/magazine/municipalism-feminization-urban-politics/
Lee, Y. (2008). Design participation tactics: the challenges and new roles for designers in the co-design process. CoDesign, 4(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710880701875613
Leivas, M. (2018). From the body to the city: participatory action research with social cartography for transformative education and global citizenship. Educational Action Research, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2018.1519453
Loo, S. (2012). Design-Ing Ethics: the Good, the Bad and the Performative. In Design and ethics: reflections on practice. Routledge. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f6e15cf3-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Luansang, C., Boonmahathanakorn, S., & Domingo-Price, M. L. (2012a). The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia. Environment and Urbanization, 24(2), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247812456125
Luansang, C., Boonmahathanakorn, S., & Domingo-Price, M. L. (2012b). The role of community architects in upgrading; reflecting on the experience in Asia. Environment and Urbanization, 24(2), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247812456125
Luck, R. (2007). Learning to talk to users in participatory design situations. Design Studies, 28(3), 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.02.002
Madanipour, A. (2010). Introduction. In Whose public space?: international case studies in urban design and development (pp. 1–15). Routledge. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=e4a879a0-5536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Marcuse, P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2–3), 185–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604810902982177
Markus, T. A., & Cameron, D. (2002). Why language matters. In The words between the spaces: buildings and language: Vol. The architext series (pp. 1–17). Routledge. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9f5a20ed-8b33-e911-80cd-005056af4099
Martens, K. (2005). Participatory Experiments from the Bottom up: The role of environmental NGOs and citizen groups. European Journal of Spatial Development, 18, 1–20. https://archive.nordregio.se/European-Journal-of-Spatial-Development/Archive/2005/index.html
Martin, D., McCann, E., & Purcell, M. (2003). Space, Scale, Governance, and Representation: Contemporary Geographical Perspectives on Urban Politics and Policy. Journal of Urban Affairs, 25(2), 113–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9906.t01-1-00001
Mattila, H. (2002). Aesthetic justice and urban planning: Who ought to have the right to design cities? GeoJournal, 58(2/3), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GEJO.0000010832.88129.cc
McDowell, L (1992a), Doing gender: Feminism, feminists and research methods in human geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 17 399–416. (n.d.). http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/pdf/Doing_Gender.pdf
McFarlane, C. (2006). Knowledge, learning and development: a post-rationalist approach. Progress in Development Studies, 6(4), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1191/1464993406ps144oa
Miessen, M. (2010). Collaboration and the conflictual, Published in The nightmare of participation - p. 91-104. Sternberg Press.
Miraftab, F. (2004). Making neo-liberal governance: the disempowering work of empowerment. International Planning Studies, 9(4), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470500050130
Miraftab, F. (2005). Insurgency and Spaces of Active Citizenship: The Story of Western Cape Anti-eviction Campaign in South Africa. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 25(2), 200–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X05282182
Mitlin, D. (2008). With and beyond the state -- co-production as a route to political influence, power and transformation for grassroots organizations. Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247808096117
Mitlin, D., & Bartlett, S. (2018). Editorial: Co-production – key ideas. Environment and Urbanization, 30(2), 355–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818791931
Mitlin, D., & Satterthwaite, D. (2004). Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction. Earthscan.
Mitlin, D., & Thompson, J. (1995). Participatory approaches in urban areas: strengthening civil society or reinforcing the status quo? Environment and Urbanization, 7(1), 231–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789500700113
Moser, C. O. N. (1989). Community participation in urban projects in the Third World. Progress in Planning, 32, 71–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-9006(89)90010-X
Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: thinking the world politically. Verso.
Mukhija, V. (2014). Urban Design for a Planet of Informal Cities. In Companion to Urban Design. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203844434.ch43
Patel, S., & Mitlin, D. (2004). Grassroots-driven development: The alliance of SPARC, the National Slum Dwellers Federation and Mahila Milan. In Empowering squatter citizen: local government, civil society and urban poverty reduction (pp. 216–241). Earthscan. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=5b1d1c38-8436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Petrescu, D., & Chiles, P. (2009). Agency: alternative practices and alternative worlds. Architectural Research Quarterly, 13(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1359135509990194
Petrescu, D., & Petcou, C. (2013). Tactics for a Transgressive Practice. Architectural Design, 83(6), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.1675
Petrescu, D., Petcou, C., & Baibarac, C. (2016). Co-producing commons-based resilience: lessons from R-Urban. Building Research & Information, 44(7), 717–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1214891
Progress in Human Geography. (n.d.). https://search.proquest.com/publication/37137
Ramirez, R. (2010). Integrated Informality in the Barrios of Havana. In Rethinking the informal city: critical perspectives from Latin America: Vol. Remapping cultural history (pp. 137–162). Berghahn Books. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=222f22f0-8536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Read, C., Earnest, J., Ali, M., & Poonacha, V. (2014). Applying a Practical, Participatory Action Research Framework for Producing Knowledge, Action and Change in Communities: A Health Case Study from Gujarat, Western India. In R. Tiwari, M. Lommerse, & D. Smith (Eds.), M2 Models and Methodologies for Community Engagement (pp. 91–105). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4585-11-8_6
Rendell, J. (2018). Only resist: Five particular qualities might characterise a specifically feminist approach to critical spatial practice, suggests Jane Rendell. Architectural Review, 243(1449), 8–18. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=asu&AN=128870014&site=ehost-live&scope=site
Rios, M. (2008). Envisioning Citizenship: Toward a Polity Approach in Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design, 13(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574800801965692
Robinson, J. (1994). White women researching/representing ‘others’: from antiapartheid to postcolonialism? In Writing women and space: colonial and postcolonial geographies: Vol. Mappings (pp. 197–228). Guilford Press.
Rolnik, R. (2014). Place, inhabitance and citizenship: the right to housing and the right to the city in the contemporary urban world. International Journal of Housing Policy, 14(3), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616718.2014.936178
Rose, G. (1997). Situating knowledges: positionality, reflexivities and other tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21(3), 305–320. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913297673302122
Roy, A. (2009). Civic Governmentality: The Politics of Inclusion in Beirut and Mumbai. Antipode, 41(1), 159–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00660.x
Roy, A. (2016). Who’s Afraid of Postcolonial Theory? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(1), 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12274
Russell, B. (2017, July 26). Radical municipalism: demanding the future. openDemocracy. https://www.opendemocracy.net/plan-c/radical-municipalism-demanding-future
Saba Golchehr. (n.d.). Data-driven design for civic participation : Introducing digital methods for on-going civic engagement for design in public space. 56–70. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315110332-5
Sandercock, L. (1998). Re/presenting Planning’s Histories. In Towards cosmopolis: planning for multicultural cities (pp. 33–54). John Wiley & Sons. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a57f9aa3-151e-ed11-bd6e-a04a5e5d2f8d
Sandercock, L., & Attili, G. (2010). Digital Ethnography as Planning Praxis: An Experiment with Film as Social Research, Community Engagement and Policy Dialogue. Planning Theory & Practice, 11(1), 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903538012
Sanoff, H. (2014). Multiple views of participatory design. International Journal of Architectural Research: ArchNet-IJAR, 2(1), 57–69. http://www.archnet-ijar.net/index.php/IJAR/article/view/177
SARA KINDON. (n.d.). Participatory Action Research: Origins, approaches and methods. 35–44. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203933671-13
Sarkissian, W. and Bunjamin-Mau, W. et al. (2009). Designing and managing a workshop. In SpeakOut: the step-by-step guide to SpeakOuts and community workshops: Vol. Tools for community planning. Earthscan. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=55416db3-8436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Schindler, S. (2017). Towards a paradigm of Southern urbanism. City, 21(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2016.1263494
Schuermans, N., & Newton, C. (2012). Being a young and foreign researcher in South Africa: Towards a postcolonial dialogue. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 33(3), 295–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12005_4
Seymour, W. (2007). Exhuming the Body: Revisiting the Role of the Visible Body in Ethnographic Research. Qualitative Health Research, 17(9), 1188–1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307308517
Siemiatycki, M. (2012). The Role of the Planning Scholar. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(2), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X12440729
Sun, X., & Huang, R. (2018). Spatial meaning-making and urban activism: Two tales of anti-PX protests in urban China. Journal of Urban Affairs, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2018.1443010
Sundberg, J. (2005). Looking for the critical geographer, or why bodies and geographies matter to the emergence of critical geographies of Latin America. Geoforum, 36(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.03.006
Swyngedouw, E., & Wilson, J. (2015). Insurgent architects and the spectral return of the urban political. In J. Metzger, P. Allmendinger, & S. Oosterlynck (Eds.), Planning against the political: democratic deficits in European territorial governance (pp. 215–225). Routledge. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=20930d20-33c9-e711-80cd-005056af4099
Thomas Abbot, Roxana Aslan, Riley O’Brien and Nathan Serafin. (n.d.-b). Embrace abolitionist planning to fight Trumpism. Progressive City. https://www.progressivecity.net/single-post/2018/04/06/EMBRACE-ABOLITIONIST-PLANNING-TO-FIGHT-TRUMPISM
Till, J. (1998). Architecture of the Impure Community. In J. Hill (Ed.), Occupying architecture: between the architect and the user (pp. 34–42). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203983829
Till, J. (2009). Imperfect ethics. In Architecture depends (pp. 171–187). MIT Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=730082ec-4e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Turner, J. F. C. (1982). Issues in Self-Help and Self-Managed Housing. In Self-help housing: a critique (pp. 99–113). Mansell. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c2ed8bb4-6536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
Umemoto, K. (2001). Walking in Another’s Shoes. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0102100102
View of Toward an Architecture of Dissensus: Participatory Urbanism in South-East Asia - Boano, C. and Kelling, E. (2013). (n.d.). https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/Boano/945
Wahby, N. (2017). Institutions and Populism in the Global South-Lessons for the Brexit-Trump Era. City & Community, 16(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/cico.12234
Wates, N. (2000). General principles A-Z. In Community planning handbook : how people can shape their cities, towns and villages in any part of the world (pp. 11–21). Earthscan Publications Ltd.
Watson, V. (2006). Deep Difference: Diversity, Planning and Ethics. Planning Theory, 5(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095206061020
Watson, V. (2009). Seeing from the South: Refocusing Urban Planning on the Globe’s Central Urban Issues. Urban Studies, 46(11), 2259–2275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342598
We Drew What We Imagined: Participatory Mapping Performance, and Arts of Landscape Making, • Sletto, B. I., (2009). (n.d.). http://www.iapad.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Sletto_CA_August_20091.pdf
Winkler, T. (2017). Black texts on white paper: Learning to resistant texts as an approach towards decolonising planning. Planning Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095217739335
Yacobi, H. (2004). Social Exclusion, Housing Environment and Tolerant Planning: The Case of the Jahelin Bedouin Tribe. Hagar - International Social Science Review. 69-84. Hagar International Social Science Review = Hājir, 5(1), 69–83.
Yacobi, H. (2007). The NGOization of Space: Dilemmas of Social Change, Planning Policy, and the Israeli Public Sphere. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 25(4), 745–758. https://doi.org/10.1068/d459t
Yacobi, H., Ventura, J., & Danzig, S. (2016). Walls, enclaves and the (counter) politics of design. Journal of Urban Design, 21(4), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2016.1184566
Zetter, R. (2002). Market enablement or sustainable development : the conflicting paradigms of urbanization. In Planning in cities: sustainability and growth in the developing world: Vol. Urban management series (pp. 31–42). ITDG. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=bea9ee93-8836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
