1.
Koehler, Derek J., Harvey, Nigel. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Vol Blackwell handbooks of experimental psychology. Wiley InterScience; 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470752937
2.
Hastie, Reid, Dawes, Robyn M. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World: The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. Sage; 2001.
3.
Ray W. Cooksey. Judgment Analysis. Academic Press; 1996.
4.
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Todd, Peter M., ABC Research Group. Simple Heuristics That Make Us Smart. Vol Evolution and cognition. Oxford University Press; 1999.
5.
Klein GA. Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods. Ablex Pub; 1993.
6.
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, Tversky, Amos. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press; 1982. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511809477
7.
Klein, Gary A. Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions. MIT Press; 1999. doi:10.2307/j.ctt1v2xt08
8.
Montgomery H, Lipshitz R, Brehmer B, Naturalistic Decision Making Conference. How Professionals Make Decisions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005.
9.
John W. Payne. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press; 1993. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139173933
10.
Simon, Herbert A. Models of Bounded Rationality. MIT Press; 1982. http://cognet.mit.edu/book/models-of-bounded-rationality
11.
Harvey, Nigel. Thinking & Reasoning: Volume 7, Issue 1: Studying Judgement : Models and Methods. Psychology Press; 2001.
12.
Hammond KR. Computer Graphics as an Aid to Learning. Science. 1971;172(3986):903-908. doi:10.1126/science.172.3986.903
13.
In one word: Not from experience %u2606. Acta Psychologica. doi:0001-6918(80)90034-7
14.
Harries C, Harvey N. Taking advice, using information and knowing what you are doing. Acta Psychologica. 2000;104(3):399-416. doi:10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00038-X
15.
Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin. 1996;119(2):254-284. http://ovidsp.dc1.ovid.com/sp-3.33.0b/ovidweb.cgi?QS2=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
16.
Harvey N, Fischer I. Develoment of experience-based decision making: The role of outcome feedback. In: The Routines of Decision Making. Psychology Press; 2008:119-137.
17.
Camerer CF, Hogarth RM. The effects of financial incentives. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1999;19(1/3):7-42. doi:10.1023/A:1007850605129
18.
Dawes R, Faust D, Meehl P. Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science. 1989;243(4899):1668-1674. doi:10.1126/science.2648573
19.
DECISION TECHNOLOGY - Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1):581. http://www.annualreviews.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.581
20.
Lerner, Jennifer S.1,3. Accounting for the Effects of Accountability. Psychological Bulletin. 125(2):255-275. http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/sp-3.10.0b/ovidweb.cgi?&S=NHDIFPGNLCDDDDJCNCNKDDDCLDCJAA00&Link+Set=S.sh.22.23.27.31%257c6%257csl_10
21.
Larrick, Rick. Debiasing. In: Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Vol Blackwell handbooks of experimental psychology. Wiley InterScience; 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470752937
22.
Soll, Jack B.1. Strategies for Revising Judgment: How (and How Well) People Use Others’ Opinions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 35(3):780-805. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00004786-200905000-00012&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
23.
Bonaccio S, Dalal RS. Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2006;101(2):127-151. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.001
24.
Yaniv I. Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2004;93(1):1-13. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.08.002
25.
Yaniv I, Milyavsky M. Using advice from multiple sources to revise and improve judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2007;103(1):104-120. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.006
26.
Yaniv I, Kleinberger E. Advice Taking in Decision Making: Egocentric Discounting and Reputation Formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2000;83(2):260-281. doi:10.1006/obhd.2000.2909
27.
Ericsson & Lehman (1996). http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.273
28.
Gobet F, Simon HA. Templates in Chess Memory: A Mechanism for Recalling Several Boards. Cognitive Psychology. 1996;31(1):1-40. doi:10.1006/cogp.1996.0011
29.
Schmidt HG, Boshuizen HPA. On the origin of intermediate effects in clinical case recall. Memory & Cognition. 1993;21(3):338-351. doi:10.3758/BF03208266
30.
Schmidt HG, Boshuizen HPA. On acquiring expertise in medicine. Educational Psychology Review. 1993;5(3):205-221. doi:10.1007/BF01323044
31.
Phillips JK. Expertise in judgement and decision making: a case for training intuitive decision skills. In: Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Vol Blackwell handbooks of experimental psychology. Wiley InterScience; 2008:297-315. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470752937.ch15
32.
Chi MTH, Glasner R, Rees E. Expertise in problem solving. In: Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence. L. Erlbaum; 1982:7-75. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c0bccad7-7436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
33.
Ericsson, K Anders, Krampe, Ralf Th. Tesch-Romer, Clemens. The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance. Psychological Review. 100(3):363-406. http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006832-199307000-00001&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
34.
Harvey N. Why Are Judgments Less Consistent in Less Predictable Task Situations? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1995;63(3):247-263. doi:10.1006/obhd.1995.1077
35.
Lawrence M, Goodwin P, O’Connor M, Önkal D. Judgmental forecasting: A review of progress over the last 25years. International Journal of Forecasting. 2006;22(3):493-518. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.007
36.
Reimers S, Harvey N. Sensitivity to autocorrelation in judgmental time series forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting. 2011;27(4):1196-1214. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.08.004
37.
Harvey N. Use of heuristics: Insights from forecasting research. Thinking & Reasoning. 2007;13(1):5-24. doi:10.1080/13546780600872502
38.
Harvey N, Reimers S. Trend damping: Under-adjustment, experimental artifact, or adaptation to features of the natural environment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 2013;39(2):589-607. http://ovidsp.dc1.ovid.com/sp-3.33.0b/ovidweb.cgi?&S=GLOHFPLIOJACFCCLKPDKPGDKPAMIAA00&Link+Set=S.sh.92%7c1%7csl_10&Counter5=SS_view_found_article%7c00004786-201303000-00017%7covft%7covftdb%7covftn&Counter5Data=00004786-201303000-00017%7covft%7covftdb%7covftn
39.
Dijksterhuis A. On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect. Science. 2006;311(5763):1005-1007. doi:10.1126/science.1121629
40.
Johansson P. Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task. Science. 2005;310(5745):116-119. doi:10.1126/science.1111709
41.
Newell BR, Wong KY, Cheung JCH, Rakow T. Think, blink or sleep on it? The impact of modes of thought on complex decision making. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2009;62(4):707-732. doi:10.1080/17470210802215202
42.
Newell BR, Shanks DR. Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2014;38(01):1-19. doi:10.1017/S0140525X12003214
43.
Petitmengin C, Remillieux A, Cahour B, Carter-Thomas S. A gap in Nisbett and Wilson’s findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes. Consciousness and Cognition. 2013;22(2):654-669. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2013.02.004
44.
NieuwensteinEtAl_2015.pdf. http://journal.sjdm.org/14/14321/jdm14321.pdf
45.
Bechara A. Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy. Science. 1997;275(5304):1293-1295. doi:10.1126/science.275.5304.1293
46.
Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR. The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005;9(4):159-162. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.002
47.
Busemeyer JR, Stout JC. A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: Decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task. Psychological Assessment. 2002;14(3):253-262. http://ovidsp.dc1.ovid.com/sp-3.33.0b/ovidweb.cgi?QS2=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
48.
Damasio, Antonio R. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Rev. ed. Vintage; 2006.
49.
Dunn BD, Dalgleish T, Lawrence AD. The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2006;30(2):239-271. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.001
50.
Maia TV. From the Cover: A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: What participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2004;101(45):16075-16080. doi:10.1073/pnas.0406666101
51.
SteingroeverEtAl2013PA.pdf. http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/2013/SteingroeverEtAl2013PA.pdf
52.
Hastie, Reid. Inside the Juror: The Psychology of Juror Decision Making. Vol Cambridge series on judgment and decision making. Cambridge University Press; 1992.
53.
Heller, Kevin Jon. The Cognitive Psychology of CircumstantialI Evidence. Michigan Law Review. 105(2):241-305. http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/201130886/142D3725BB659CAA59D/1?accountid=14511
54.
Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model %u2606 %u2606%u2606. Cognitive Psychology. doi:0010-0285(92)90002-J
55.
Kassin SM, Sommers SR. Inadmissible Testimony, Instructions to Disregard, and the Jury: Substantive Versus Procedural Considerations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1997;23(10):1046-1054. doi:10.1177/01461672972310005
56.
Pennington N, Hastie R. Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992;62(2):189-206. http://ovidsp.dc1.ovid.com/sp-3.33.0b/ovidweb.cgi?QS2=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
57.
Baron, Jonathan1,2. Biases in the Quantitative Measurement of Values for Public Decisions. Psychological Bulletin. 122(1):72-88. http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/sp-3.10.0b/ovidweb.cgi?&S=BEFLFPCMMEDDDDJONCNKMEGCBOCEAA00&Link+Set=S.sh.22.23.27.41%257c7%257csl_10
58.
Jane Beattie, Judith Covey, Paul Dolan, et al. On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1998;17(1):5-26. doi:10.1023/A:1007711416843
59.
Skeem JL, Polaschek DLL, Patrick CJ, Lilienfeld SO. Psychopathic Personality: Bridging the Gap Between Scientific Evidence and Public Policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2011;12(3):95-162. doi:10.1177/1529100611426706
60.
Parsons, D. W. Public Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis. Edward Elgar; 1995.
61.
Mitchell, Robert Cameron, Carson, Richard T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the future; 1989.
62.
Haskell, Robert E. Transfer of Learning: Cognition, Instruction, and Reasoning. Vol Educational psychology series. Academic Press; 2001.
63.
Slovic, Paul. The Perception of Risk. Vol Risk, society, and policy series. Earthscan; 2000. https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.4324/9781315661773
64.
Thaler, Richard H., Sunstein, Cass R. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. Penguin; 2009.
65.
Michie S, West R. Behaviour change theory and evidence: a presentation to Government. Health Psychology Review. 2013;7(1):1-22. doi:10.1080/17437199.2011.649445
66.
Pidgeon, N, Gregory R. Judgment, decision making, and public policy. In: Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Vol Blackwell handbooks of experimental psychology. Wiley InterScience; 2008:547-566. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470752937.ch27
67.
Download the MINDSPACE report | mindspace online. http://www.mindspace-online.org/?p=23
68.
Behavioural Insights Team annual update. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/behavioural-insights-team-annual-update
69.
Ladouceur R, Sévigny S. Structural Characteristics of Video Lotteries: Effects of a Stopping Device on Illusion of Control and Gambling Persistence. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2005;21(2):117-131. doi:10.1007/s10899-005-3028-5
70.
Matute, Vadillo, Blanco, & Musca (2007). http://necplusultra.comze.com/publis/MatuteVadilloBlancoMusca2007.pdf
71.
Ayton P, Fischer I. The hot hand fallacy and the gambler’s fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness? Memory & Cognition. 2004;32(8):1369-1378. doi:10.3758/BF03206327
72.
Clark L, Lawrence AJ, Astley-Jones F, Gray N. Gambling Near-Misses Enhance Motivation to Gamble and Recruit Win-Related Brain Circuitry. Neuron. 2009;61(3):481-490. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.031
73.
Delfabbro P. The Stubborn Logic of Regular Gamblers: Obstacles and Dilemmas in Cognitive Gambling Research. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2004;20(1):1-21. doi:10.1023/B:JOGS.0000016701.17146.d0
74.
The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences %u2606. Cognitive Psychology. doi:0010-0285(85)90010-6
75.
Griffiths M. Fruit machine gambling: The importance of structural characteristics. Journal of Gambling Studies. 1993;9(2):101-120. doi:10.1007/BF01014863
76.
Griffiths MD. The cognitive psychology of gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies. 1990;6(1):31-42. doi:10.1007/BF01015747
77.
Langer EJ. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975;32(2):311-328. http://ovidsp.dc1.ovid.com/sp-3.33.0b/ovidweb.cgi?WebLinkFrameset=1&S=GLOHFPLIOJACFCCLKPDKPGDKPAMIAA00&returnUrl=ovidweb.cgi%3fMain%2bSearch%2bPage%3d1%26S%3dGLOHFPLIOJACFCCLKPDKPGDKPAMIAA00&directlink=http%3a%2f%2fovidsp.dc1.ovid.com%2fovftpdfs%2fFPACKPDKPGCLOJ00%2ffs046%2fovft%2flive%2fgv023%2f00005205%2f00005205-197508000-00015.pdf&filename=The+illusion+of+control.&navigation_links=NavLinks.S.sh.223.1&link_from=S.sh.223%7c1&pdf_key=FPACKPDKPGCLOJ00&pdf_index=/fs046/ovft/live/gv023/00005205/00005205-197508000-00015&D=yrovft&link_set=S.sh.223|1|sl_10|resultSet|S.sh.223.224|0
78.
Garling T, Kirchler E, Lewis A, van Raaij F. Psychology, Financial Decision Making, and Financial Crises. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2009;10(1):1-47. doi:10.1177/1529100610378437
79.
Barberis N, Huang M. Mental Accounting, Loss Aversion, and Individual Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance. 2001;56(4):1247-1292. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00367
80.
Hirshleifer D. Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing. The Journal of Finance. 2001;56(4):1533-1597. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00379
81.
Shleifer A, Vishny RW. The Limits of Arbitrage. The Journal of Finance. 1997;52(1):35-55. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03807.x
82.
Shafir E. Money Illusion. http://qje.oxfordjournals.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/content/112/2/341.full.pdf+html
83.
Muradoglu G. Behavioural finance: the role of psychological factors in financial decisions - ProQuest.
84.
Benartzi S. Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle. http://qje.oxfordjournals.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/content/110/1/73.full.pdf+html
85.
Benartzi, Shlomo, Benartzi s. Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. The American Economic Review. 91(1):79-98. http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/233040685/142D34CE8D716101499/6?accountid=14511
86.
Glaser, M, Noth M, Weber M. Chapter. In: Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Vol Behavioral finance. Wiley InterScience; 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470752937
87.
Shefrin H. Beyond Greed and Fear: Understanding Behavioral Finance and the Psychology of Investing. Vol Financial Management Association survey and synthesis series. Oxford Scholarship Online; 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195161211.001.0001
88.
Konečni, Vladimir J., Ebbesen, Ebbe B. The Criminal Justice System: A Social-Psychological Approach. Vol A series of books in psychology. Freeman; 1982.
89.
DHAMI MK. Lay Magistrates’ Interpretations of ‘Substantial Grounds’ for Denying Bail. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. Published online 7 June 2010:no-no. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2311.2010.00623.x
90.
Hucklesby, Anthea. Bail or Jail - The Practical Operation of the Bail Act 1976. 1996;23. http://www.heinonline.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jlsocty23&id=221&collection=journals&index=journals/jlsocty#221
91.
Brooks-Gordon, Belinda, Freeman, Michael D. A. Law and Psychology. Vol Current legal issues. Oxford University Press; 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199211395.001.0001
92.
Association of American Medical Colleges. Academic medicine.
93.
Coderre S, Mandin H, Harasym PH, Fick GH. Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success. Medical Education. 2003;37(8):695-703. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01577.x
94.
Custers et al. (1996). http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-3.10.0b/ovidweb.cgi?WebLinkFrameset=1&S=DEHPFPMEAADDPNMENCNKEHLBBJLGAA00&returnUrl=ovidweb.cgi%3fMain%2bSearch%2bPage%3d1%26S%3dDEHPFPMEAADDPNMENCNKEHLBBJLGAA00&directlink=http%3a%2f%2fgraphics.tx.ovid.com%2fovftpdfs%2fFPDDNCLBEHMEAA00%2ffs046%2fovft%2flive%2fgv023%2f00001888%2f00001888-199610000-00044.pdf&filename=Mental representations of medical diagnostic knowledge%3a a review.&link_from=jb.search.37%7c1&pdf_key=FPDDNCLBEHMEAA00&pdf_index=/fs046/ovft/live/gv023/00001888/00001888-199610000-00044&D=ovft&link_set=jb.search.37|1|sl_10|search|jb.search.37.38|0
95.
Arthur S. Elstein and Alan Schwarz. Evidence Base Of Clinical Diagnosis: Clinical Problem Solving And Diagnostic Decision Making: Selective Review Of The Cognitive Literature. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2002;324(7339):729-732. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25227815
96.
A Kushniruk, V Patel, A Marley. Small worlds and medical expertise: implications for medical cognition and knowledge engineering. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 1998;49(3):255-271. doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(98)00044-6
97.
Chapman GB. The psychology of medical decision making. In: Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making. Vol Blackwell handbooks of experimental psychology. Wiley InterScience; 2008:585-603. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470752937.ch29
98.
Bettman JR, Luce MF, Payne JW. Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer Research. 1998;25(3):187-217. doi:10.1086/209535
99.
Iyengar SS, Lepper MR. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2000;79(6):995-1006. http://ovidsp.dc1.ovid.com/sp-3.33.0b/ovidweb.cgi?QS2=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
100.
Scheibehenne B, Greifeneder R, Todd PM. Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta‐Analytic Review of Choice Overload. Journal of Consumer Research. 2010;37(3):409-425. doi:10.1086/651235
101.
Reason-based choice %u2606. Cognition. doi:0010-0277(93)90034-S
