1.
Koehler, Derek J., Harvey, Nigel: Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Wiley InterScience, Hoboken, NJ (2008).
2.
Hastie, Reid, Dawes, Robyn M.: Rational choice in an uncertain world: the psychology of judgment and decision making. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif (2001).
3.
Ray W. Cooksey: Judgment analysis. Academic Press, San Diego (1996).
4.
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Todd, Peter M., ABC Research Group: Simple heuristics that make us smart. Oxford University Press, New York (1999).
5.
Klein, G.A.: Decision making in action: models and methods. Ablex Pub, Norwood, N.J (1993).
6.
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, Tversky, Amos: Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477.
7.
Klein, Gary A.: Sources of power: how people make decisions. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1v2xt08.
8.
Montgomery, H., Lipshitz, R., Brehmer, B., Naturalistic Decision Making Conference: How professionals make decisions. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J. (2005).
9.
John W. Payne: The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173933.
10.
Simon, Herbert A.: Models of bounded rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass (1982).
11.
Harvey, Nigel: Thinking & reasoning: Volume 7, issue 1: Studying judgement : models and methods. Psychology Press, Basingstoke (2001).
12.
Hammond, K.R.: Computer Graphics as an Aid to Learning. Science. 172, 903–908 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.172.3986.903.
13.
In one word: Not from experience %u2606. Acta Psychologica. https://doi.org/0001-6918(80)90034-7.
14.
Harries, C., Harvey, N.: Taking advice, using information and knowing what you are doing. Acta Psychologica. 104, 399–416 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00038-X.
15.
Kluger, A.N., DeNisi, A.: The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin. 119, 254–284 (1996).
16.
Harvey, N., Fischer, I.: Develoment of experience-based decision making: The role of outcome feedback. In: The routines of decision making. pp. 119–137. Psychology Press, New York (2008).
17.
Camerer, C.F., Hogarth, R.M.: The effects of financial incentives. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 19, 7–42 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007850605129.
18.
Dawes, R., Faust, D., Meehl, P.: Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science. 243, 1668–1674 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2648573.
19.
DECISION TECHNOLOGY - Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1):581, http://www.annualreviews.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.581.
20.
Lerner, Jennifer S.1,3: Accounting for the Effects of Accountability. Psychological Bulletin. 125, 255–275.
21.
Larrick, Rick: Debiasing. In: Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Wiley InterScience, Hoboken, NJ (2008).
22.
Soll, Jack B.1: Strategies for Revising Judgment: How (and How Well) People Use Others’ Opinions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 35, 780–805.
23.
Bonaccio, S., Dalal, R.S.: Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 101, 127–151 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.07.001.
24.
Yaniv, I.: Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 93, 1–13 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.08.002.
25.
Yaniv, I., Milyavsky, M.: Using advice from multiple sources to revise and improve judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 103, 104–120 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.05.006.
26.
Yaniv, I., Kleinberger, E.: Advice Taking in Decision Making: Egocentric Discounting and Reputation Formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 83, 260–281 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2909.
27.
Ericsson & Lehman (1996), http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.273.
28.
Gobet, F., Simon, H.A.: Templates in Chess Memory: A Mechanism for Recalling Several Boards. Cognitive Psychology. 31, 1–40 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1996.0011.
29.
Schmidt, H.G., Boshuizen, H.P.A.: On the origin of intermediate effects in clinical case recall. Memory & Cognition. 21, 338–351 (1993). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03208266.
30.
Schmidt, H.G., Boshuizen, H.P.A.: On acquiring expertise in medicine. Educational Psychology Review. 5, 205–221 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01323044.
31.
Phillips, J.K.: Expertise in judgement and decision making: a case for training intuitive decision skills. In: Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. pp. 297–315. Wiley InterScience, Hoboken, NJ (2008).
32.
Chi, M.T.H., Glasner, R., Rees, E.: Expertise in problem solving. In: Advances in the psychology of human intelligence. pp. 7–75. L. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J. (1982).
33.
Ericsson, K Anders, Krampe, Ralf Th. Tesch-Romer, Clemens: The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance. Psychological Review. 100, 363–406.
34.
Harvey, N.: Why Are Judgments Less Consistent in Less Predictable Task Situations? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 63, 247–263 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1077.
35.
Lawrence, M., Goodwin, P., O’Connor, M., Önkal, D.: Judgmental forecasting: A review of progress over the last 25years. International Journal of Forecasting. 22, 493–518 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.007.
36.
Reimers, S., Harvey, N.: Sensitivity to autocorrelation in judgmental time series forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting. 27, 1196–1214 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2010.08.004.
37.
Harvey, N.: Use of heuristics: Insights from forecasting research. Thinking & Reasoning. 13, 5–24 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780600872502.
38.
Harvey, N., Reimers, S.: Trend damping: Under-adjustment, experimental artifact, or adaptation to features of the natural environment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 39, 589–607 (2013).
39.
Dijksterhuis, A.: On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect. Science. 311, 1005–1007 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1121629.
40.
Johansson, P.: Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task. Science. 310, 116–119 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111709.
41.
Newell, B.R., Wong, K.Y., Cheung, J.C.H., Rakow, T.: Think, blink or sleep on it? The impact of modes of thought on complex decision making. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 62, 707–732 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802215202.
42.
Newell, B.R., Shanks, D.R.: Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 38, 1–19 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003214.
43.
Petitmengin, C., Remillieux, A., Cahour, B., Carter-Thomas, S.: A gap in Nisbett and Wilson’s findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes. Consciousness and Cognition. 22, 654–669 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2013.02.004.
44.
NieuwensteinEtAl_2015.pdf.
45.
Bechara, A.: Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy. Science. 275, 1293–1295 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.275.5304.1293.
46.
Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., Damasio, A.R.: The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 9, 159–162 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.002.
47.
Busemeyer, J.R., Stout, J.C.: A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: Decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task. Psychological Assessment. 14, 253–262 (2002).
48.
Damasio, Antonio R.: Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Vintage, London (2006).
49.
Dunn, B.D., Dalgleish, T., Lawrence, A.D.: The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 30, 239–271 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.001.
50.
Maia, T.V.: From the Cover: A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: What participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101, 16075–16080 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406666101.
51.
SteingroeverEtAl2013PA.pdf.
52.
Hastie, Reid: Inside the juror: the psychology of juror decision making. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [England] (1992).
53.
Heller, Kevin Jon: The Cognitive Psychology of CircumstantialI Evidence. Michigan Law Review. 105, 241–305.
54.
Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model %u2606 %u2606%u2606. Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/0010-0285(92)90002-J.
55.
Kassin, S.M., Sommers, S.R.: Inadmissible Testimony, Instructions to Disregard, and the Jury: Substantive Versus Procedural Considerations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 23, 1046–1054 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672972310005.
56.
Pennington, N., Hastie, R.: Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 62, 189–206 (1992).
57.
Baron, Jonathan1,2: Biases in the Quantitative Measurement of Values for Public Decisions. Psychological Bulletin. 122, 72–88.
58.
Jane Beattie, Judith Covey, Paul Dolan, Lorraine Hopkins, MichaelI Jones-Lee, Graham Loomes, Nick Pidgeon, Angela Robinson, Anne Spencer: On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 17, 5–26 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007711416843.
59.
Skeem, J.L., Polaschek, D.L.L., Patrick, C.J., Lilienfeld, S.O.: Psychopathic Personality: Bridging the Gap Between Scientific Evidence and Public Policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 12, 95–162 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100611426706.
60.
Parsons, D. W.: Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (1995).
61.
Mitchell, Robert Cameron, Carson, Richard T.: Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resources for the future, Washington, D.C. (1989).
62.
Haskell, Robert E.: Transfer of learning: cognition, instruction, and reasoning. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif (2001).
63.
Slovic, Paul: The perception of risk. Earthscan, London (2000).
64.
Thaler, Richard H., Sunstein, Cass R.: Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Penguin, London (2009).
65.
Michie, S., West, R.: Behaviour change theory and evidence: a presentation to Government. Health Psychology Review. 7, 1–22 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2011.649445.
66.
Pidgeon, N, Gregory, R.: Judgment, decision making, and public policy. In: Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. pp. 547–566. Wiley InterScience, Hoboken, NJ (2008).
67.
Download the MINDSPACE report | mindspace online, http://www.mindspace-online.org/?p=23.
68.
Behavioural Insights Team annual update, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/behavioural-insights-team-annual-update.
69.
Ladouceur, R., Sévigny, S.: Structural Characteristics of Video Lotteries: Effects of a Stopping Device on Illusion of Control and Gambling Persistence. Journal of Gambling Studies. 21, 117–131 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-005-3028-5.
70.
Matute, Vadillo, Blanco, & Musca (2007)., http://necplusultra.comze.com/publis/MatuteVadilloBlancoMusca2007.pdf.
71.
Ayton, P., Fischer, I.: The hot hand fallacy and the gambler’s fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness? Memory & Cognition. 32, 1369–1378 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206327.
72.
Clark, L., Lawrence, A.J., Astley-Jones, F., Gray, N.: Gambling Near-Misses Enhance Motivation to Gamble and Recruit Win-Related Brain Circuitry. Neuron. 61, 481–490 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.031.
73.
Delfabbro, P.: The Stubborn Logic of Regular Gamblers: Obstacles and Dilemmas in Cognitive Gambling Research. Journal of Gambling Studies. 20, 1–21 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOGS.0000016701.17146.d0.
74.
The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences %u2606. Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/0010-0285(85)90010-6.
75.
Griffiths, M.: Fruit machine gambling: The importance of structural characteristics. Journal of Gambling Studies. 9, 101–120 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01014863.
76.
Griffiths, M.D.: The cognitive psychology of gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies. 6, 31–42 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01015747.
77.
Langer, E.J.: The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 32, 311–328 (1975).
78.
Garling, T., Kirchler, E., Lewis, A., van Raaij, F.: Psychology, Financial Decision Making, and Financial Crises. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 10, 1–47 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100610378437.
79.
Barberis, N., Huang, M.: Mental Accounting, Loss Aversion, and Individual Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance. 56, 1247–1292 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00367.
80.
Hirshleifer, D.: Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing. The Journal of Finance. 56, 1533–1597 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00379.
81.
Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W.: The Limits of Arbitrage. The Journal of Finance. 52, 35–55 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03807.x.
82.
Shafir, E.: Money Illusion.
83.
Muradoglu, G.: Behavioural finance: the role of psychological factors in financial decisions - ProQuest.
84.
Benartzi, S.: Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle.
85.
Benartzi, Shlomo, Benartzi, s: Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. The American Economic Review. 91, 79–98.
86.
Glaser, M, Noth, M., Weber, M.: Chapter. In: Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Wiley InterScience, Hoboken, NJ (2008).
87.
Shefrin, H.: Beyond greed and fear: understanding behavioral finance and the psychology of investing. Oxford Scholarship Online, [Oxford] (2003).
88.
Konečni, Vladimir J., Ebbesen, Ebbe B.: The Criminal justice system: a social-psychological approach. Freeman, San Francisco (1982).
89.
DHAMI, M.K.: Lay Magistrates’ Interpretations of ‘Substantial Grounds’ for Denying Bail. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. no-no (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.2010.00623.x.
90.
Hucklesby, Anthea: Bail or Jail - The Practical Operation of the Bail Act 1976. 23, (1996).
91.
Brooks-Gordon, Belinda, Freeman, Michael D. A.: Law and psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2006).
92.
Association of American Medical Colleges: Academic medicine.
93.
Coderre, S., Mandin, H., Harasym, P.H., Fick, G.H.: Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success. Medical Education. 37, 695–703 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01577.x.
94.
Custers et al. (1996).
95.
Arthur S. Elstein and Alan Schwarz: Evidence Base Of Clinical Diagnosis: Clinical Problem Solving And Diagnostic Decision Making: Selective Review Of The Cognitive Literature. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 324, 729–732 (2002).
96.
A Kushniruk, V Patel, A Marley: Small worlds and medical expertise: implications for medical cognition and knowledge engineering. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 49, 255–271 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-5056(98)00044-6.
97.
Chapman, G.B.: The psychology of medical decision making. In: Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. pp. 585–603. Wiley InterScience, Hoboken, NJ (2008).
98.
Bettman, J.R., Luce, M.F., Payne, J.W.: Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer Research. 25, 187–217 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1086/209535.
99.
Iyengar, S.S., Lepper, M.R.: When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 79, 995–1006 (2000).
100.
Scheibehenne, B., Greifeneder, R., Todd, P.M.: Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta‐Analytic Review of Choice Overload. Journal of Consumer Research. 37, 409–425 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1086/651235.
101.
Reason-based choice %u2606. Cognition. https://doi.org/0010-0277(93)90034-S.
