1.
Koehler, Derek J., Harvey, Nigel. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making [Internet]. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley InterScience; 2008. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470752937
2.
Hastie, Reid, Dawes, Robyn M. Rational choice in an uncertain world: the psychology of judgment and decision making. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2001.
3.
Ray W. Cooksey. Judgment analysis. San Diego: Academic Press; 1996.
4.
Gigerenzer, Gerd, Todd, Peter M., ABC Research Group. Simple heuristics that make us smart. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.
5.
Klein GA. Decision making in action: models and methods. Norwood, N.J: Ablex Pub; 1993.
6.
Kahneman, Daniel, Slovic, Paul, Tversky, Amos. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1982.
7.
Klein, Gary A. Sources of power: how people make decisions. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1999.
8.
Montgomery H, Lipshitz R, Brehmer B, Naturalistic Decision Making Conference. How professionals make decisions. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2005.
9.
John W. Payne. The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1993.
10.
Simon, Herbert A. Models of bounded rationality [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1982. Available from: http://cognet.mit.edu/book/models-of-bounded-rationality
11.
Harvey, Nigel. Thinking & reasoning: Volume 7, issue 1: Studying judgement : models and methods. Basingstoke: Psychology Press; 2001.
12.
Hammond KR. Computer Graphics as an Aid to Learning. Science. 1971 May 28;172(3986):903–908.
13.
In one word: Not from experience %u2606. Acta Psychologica [Internet]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/science/article/pii/0001691880900347
14.
Harries C, Harvey N. Taking advice, using information and knowing what you are doing. Acta Psychologica. 2000;104(3):399–416.
15.
Kluger AN, DeNisi A. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin [Internet]. 1996;119(2):254–284. Available from: http://ovidsp.dc1.ovid.com/sp-3.33.0b/ovidweb.cgi?QS2=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
16.
Harvey N, Fischer I. Develoment of experience-based decision making: The role of outcome feedback. The routines of decision making. New York: Psychology Press; 2008. p. 119–137.
17.
Camerer CF, Hogarth RM. The effects of financial incentives. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1999;19(1/3):7–42.
18.
Dawes R, Faust D, Meehl P. Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science. 1989 Mar 31;243(4899):1668–1674.
19.
DECISION TECHNOLOGY - Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1):581 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.annualreviews.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.581
20.
Lerner, Jennifer S.1,3. Accounting for the Effects of Accountability. Psychological Bulletin [Internet]. 125(2):255–275. Available from: http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/sp-3.10.0b/ovidweb.cgi?&S=NHDIFPGNLCDDDDJCNCNKDDDCLDCJAA00&Link+Set=S.sh.22.23.27.31%257c6%257csl_10
21.
Larrick, Rick. Debiasing. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making [Internet]. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley InterScience; 2008. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470752937
22.
Soll, Jack B.1. Strategies for Revising Judgment: How (and How Well) People Use Others’ Opinions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition [Internet]. 35(3):780–805. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00004786-200905000-00012&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
23.
Bonaccio S, Dalal RS. Advice taking and decision-making: An integrative literature review, and implications for the organizational sciences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2006 Nov;101(2):127–151.
24.
Yaniv I. Receiving other people’s advice: Influence and benefit. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2004 Jan;93(1):1–13.
25.
Yaniv I, Milyavsky M. Using advice from multiple sources to revise and improve judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2007 May;103(1):104–120.
26.
Yaniv I, Kleinberger E. Advice Taking in Decision Making: Egocentric Discounting and Reputation Formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 2000 Nov;83(2):260–281.
27.
Ericsson & Lehman (1996) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.273
28.
Gobet F, Simon HA. Templates in Chess Memory: A Mechanism for Recalling Several Boards. Cognitive Psychology. 1996 Aug;31(1):1–40.
29.
Schmidt HG, Boshuizen HPA. On the origin of intermediate effects in clinical case recall. Memory & Cognition. 1993 May;21(3):338–351.
30.
Schmidt HG, Boshuizen HPA. On acquiring expertise in medicine. Educational Psychology Review. 1993 Sept;5(3):205–221.
31.
Phillips JK. Expertise in judgement and decision making: a case for training intuitive decision skills. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making [Internet]. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley InterScience; 2008. p. 297–315. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470752937.ch15
32.
Chi MTH, Glasner R, Rees E. Expertise in problem solving. Advances in the psychology of human intelligence [Internet]. Hillsdale, N.J.: L. Erlbaum; 1982. p. 7–75. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c0bccad7-7436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
33.
Ericsson, K Anders, Krampe, Ralf Th. Tesch-Romer, Clemens. The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance. Psychological Review [Internet]. 100(3):363–406. Available from: http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00006832-199307000-00001&LSLINK=80&D=ovft
34.
Harvey N. Why Are Judgments Less Consistent in Less Predictable Task Situations? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1995;63(3):247–263.
35.
Lawrence M, Goodwin P, O’Connor M, Önkal D. Judgmental forecasting: A review of progress over the last 25years. International Journal of Forecasting. 2006;22(3):493–518.
36.
Reimers S, Harvey N. Sensitivity to autocorrelation in judgmental time series forecasting. International Journal of Forecasting. 2011 Oct;27(4):1196–1214.
37.
Harvey N. Use of heuristics: Insights from forecasting research. Thinking & Reasoning. 2007 Feb;13(1):5–24.
38.
Harvey N, Reimers S. Trend damping: Under-adjustment, experimental artifact, or adaptation to features of the natural environment? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition [Internet]. 2013;39(2):589–607. Available from: http://ovidsp.dc1.ovid.com/sp-3.33.0b/ovidweb.cgi?&S=GLOHFPLIOJACFCCLKPDKPGDKPAMIAA00&Link+Set=S.sh.92%7c1%7csl_10&Counter5=SS_view_found_article%7c00004786-201303000-00017%7covft%7covftdb%7covftn&Counter5Data=00004786-201303000-00017%7covft%7covftdb%7covftn
39.
Dijksterhuis A. On Making the Right Choice: The Deliberation-Without-Attention Effect. Science. 2006 Feb 17;311(5763):1005–1007.
40.
Johansson P. Failure to Detect Mismatches Between Intention and Outcome in a Simple Decision Task. Science. 2005 Oct 7;310(5745):116–119.
41.
Newell BR, Wong KY, Cheung JCH, Rakow T. Think, blink or sleep on it? The impact of modes of thought on complex decision making. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 2009 Apr;62(4):707–732.
42.
Newell BR, Shanks DR. Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2014 Dec;38(01):1–19.
43.
Petitmengin C, Remillieux A, Cahour B, Carter-Thomas S. A gap in Nisbett and Wilson’s findings? A first-person access to our cognitive processes. Consciousness and Cognition. 2013 June;22(2):654–669.
44.
NieuwensteinEtAl_2015.pdf. Available from: http://journal.sjdm.org/14/14321/jdm14321.pdf
45.
Bechara A. Deciding Advantageously Before Knowing the Advantageous Strategy. Science. 1997 Feb 28;275(5304):1293–1295.
46.
Bechara A, Damasio H, Tranel D, Damasio AR. The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2005;9(4):159–162.
47.
Busemeyer JR, Stout JC. A contribution of cognitive decision models to clinical assessment: Decomposing performance on the Bechara gambling task. Psychological Assessment [Internet]. 2002;14(3):253–262. Available from: http://ovidsp.dc1.ovid.com/sp-3.33.0b/ovidweb.cgi?QS2=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
48.
Damasio, Antonio R. Descartes’ error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. Rev. ed. London: Vintage; 2006.
49.
Dunn BD, Dalgleish T, Lawrence AD. The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2006 Jan;30(2):239–271.
50.
Maia TV. From the Cover: A reexamination of the evidence for the somatic marker hypothesis: What participants really know in the Iowa gambling task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2004 Nov 2;101(45):16075–16080.
51.
SteingroeverEtAl2013PA.pdf. Available from: http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/2013/SteingroeverEtAl2013PA.pdf
52.
Hastie, Reid. Inside the juror: the psychology of juror decision making. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
53.
Heller, Kevin Jon. The Cognitive Psychology of CircumstantialI Evidence. Michigan Law Review [Internet]. Michigan Law Review Association; 105(2):241–305. Available from: http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/201130886/142D3725BB659CAA59D/1?accountid=14511
54.
Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model %u2606 %u2606%u2606. Cognitive Psychology [Internet]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/science/article/pii/001002859290002J
55.
Kassin SM, Sommers SR. Inadmissible Testimony, Instructions to Disregard, and the Jury: Substantive Versus Procedural Considerations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1997 Oct 1;23(10):1046–1054.
56.
Pennington N, Hastie R. Explaining the evidence: Tests of the Story Model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology [Internet]. 1992;62(2):189–206. Available from: http://ovidsp.dc1.ovid.com/sp-3.33.0b/ovidweb.cgi?QS2=434f4e1a73d37e8c106b2a94fb1982bbaf1de4e64ca0a4e2ff9abff99b72f65480f726041007b8d43bc49d27cc1e54223fa4057d26248da2bc48c4ef0072b311b7470c5012a1640792e09ffb574b6d69535a78b5d88d9bde009eda67d941b96b11380bb13cce2afda17e3153c23680118e51523d725f2385fd333800c8c3db635f67ce6262b964cc1b2e190f5bfb7cd4ba212e29a3960378c9bb3570f2cba1b7b6f6e06de6103bcee676133f3a530e75b743bc18f01f7eb36475f18b1135bca44b86618ccdaef1bcb6684b822dba18fcde5db6c55daac4b794bfa176ae7180ef490ff435da7578bfe547dba2374be980bb00e2971a34c7d646d104f10ea9a5f5c0f6faf2184ec3d5d60c995384865e20
57.
Baron, Jonathan1,2. Biases in the Quantitative Measurement of Values for Public Decisions. Psychological Bulletin [Internet]. 122(1):72–88. Available from: http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/sp-3.10.0b/ovidweb.cgi?&S=BEFLFPCMMEDDDDJONCNKMEGCBOCEAA00&Link+Set=S.sh.22.23.27.41%257c7%257csl_10
58.
Jane Beattie, Judith Covey, Paul Dolan, Lorraine Hopkins, MichaelI Jones-Lee, Graham Loomes, Nick Pidgeon, Angela Robinson, Anne Spencer. On the contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 1998;17(1):5–26.
59.
Skeem JL, Polaschek DLL, Patrick CJ, Lilienfeld SO. Psychopathic Personality: Bridging the Gap Between Scientific Evidence and Public Policy. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2011 Dec 1;12(3):95–162.
60.
Parsons, D. W. Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 1995.
61.
Mitchell, Robert Cameron, Carson, Richard T. Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington, D.C.: Resources for the future; 1989.
62.
Haskell, Robert E. Transfer of learning: cognition, instruction, and reasoning. San Diego, Calif: Academic Press; 2001.
63.
Slovic, Paul. The perception of risk [Internet]. London: Earthscan; 2000. Available from: https://doi-org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/10.4324/9781315661773
64.
Thaler, Richard H., Sunstein, Cass R. Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. London: Penguin; 2009.
65.
Michie S, West R. Behaviour change theory and evidence: a presentation to Government. Health Psychology Review. 2013 Mar;7(1):1–22.
66.
Pidgeon, N, Gregory R. Judgment, decision making, and public policy. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making [Internet]. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley InterScience; 2008. p. 547–566. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470752937.ch27
67.
Download the MINDSPACE report | mindspace online [Internet]. Available from: http://www.mindspace-online.org/?p=23
68.
Behavioural Insights Team annual update [Internet]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/behavioural-insights-team-annual-update
69.
Ladouceur R, Sévigny S. Structural Characteristics of Video Lotteries: Effects of a Stopping Device on Illusion of Control and Gambling Persistence. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2005 June;21(2):117–131.
70.
Matute, Vadillo, Blanco, & Musca (2007). [Internet]. Available from: http://necplusultra.comze.com/publis/MatuteVadilloBlancoMusca2007.pdf
71.
Ayton P, Fischer I. The hot hand fallacy and the gambler’s fallacy: Two faces of subjective randomness? Memory & Cognition. 2004 Dec;32(8):1369–1378.
72.
Clark L, Lawrence AJ, Astley-Jones F, Gray N. Gambling Near-Misses Enhance Motivation to Gamble and Recruit Win-Related Brain Circuitry. Neuron. 2009 Feb;61(3):481–490.
73.
Delfabbro P. The Stubborn Logic of Regular Gamblers: Obstacles and Dilemmas in Cognitive Gambling Research. Journal of Gambling Studies. 2004 Spring;20(1):1–21.
74.
The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences %u2606. Cognitive Psychology [Internet]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0010028585900106
75.
Griffiths M. Fruit machine gambling: The importance of structural characteristics. Journal of Gambling Studies. 1993;9(2):101–120.
76.
Griffiths MD. The cognitive psychology of gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies. 1990;6(1):31–42.
77.
Langer EJ. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology [Internet]. 1975;32(2):311–328. Available from: http://ovidsp.dc1.ovid.com/sp-3.33.0b/ovidweb.cgi?WebLinkFrameset=1&S=GLOHFPLIOJACFCCLKPDKPGDKPAMIAA00&returnUrl=ovidweb.cgi%3fMain%2bSearch%2bPage%3d1%26S%3dGLOHFPLIOJACFCCLKPDKPGDKPAMIAA00&directlink=http%3a%2f%2fovidsp.dc1.ovid.com%2fovftpdfs%2fFPACKPDKPGCLOJ00%2ffs046%2fovft%2flive%2fgv023%2f00005205%2f00005205-197508000-00015.pdf&filename=The+illusion+of+control.&navigation_links=NavLinks.S.sh.223.1&link_from=S.sh.223%7c1&pdf_key=FPACKPDKPGCLOJ00&pdf_index=/fs046/ovft/live/gv023/00005205/00005205-197508000-00015&D=yrovft&link_set=S.sh.223|1|sl_10|resultSet|S.sh.223.224|0
78.
Garling T, Kirchler E, Lewis A, van Raaij F. Psychology, Financial Decision Making, and Financial Crises. Psychological Science in the Public Interest. 2009 Jan 1;10(1):1–47.
79.
Barberis N, Huang M. Mental Accounting, Loss Aversion, and Individual Stock Returns. The Journal of Finance. 2001 Aug;56(4):1247–1292.
80.
Hirshleifer D. Investor Psychology and Asset Pricing. The Journal of Finance. 2001 Aug;56(4):1533–1597.
81.
Shleifer A, Vishny RW. The Limits of Arbitrage. The Journal of Finance. 1997 Mar;52(1):35–55.
82.
Shafir E. Money Illusion. Available from: http://qje.oxfordjournals.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/content/112/2/341.full.pdf+html
83.
Muradoglu G. Behavioural finance: the role of psychological factors in financial decisions - ProQuest.
84.
Benartzi S. Myopic Loss Aversion and the Equity Premium Puzzle. Available from: http://qje.oxfordjournals.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/content/110/1/73.full.pdf+html
85.
Benartzi, Shlomo, Benartzi s. Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. The American Economic Review [Internet]. American Economic Association; 91(1):79–98. Available from: http://search.proquest.com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/docview/233040685/142D34CE8D716101499/6?accountid=14511
86.
Glaser, M, Noth M, Weber M. Chapter. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making [Internet]. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley InterScience; 2008. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470752937
87.
Shefrin H. Beyond greed and fear: understanding behavioral finance and the psychology of investing [Internet]. [Oxford]: Oxford Scholarship Online; 2003. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195161211.001.0001
88.
Konečni, Vladimir J., Ebbesen, Ebbe B. The Criminal justice system: a social-psychological approach. San Francisco: Freeman; 1982.
89.
DHAMI MK. Lay Magistrates’ Interpretations of ‘Substantial Grounds’ for Denying Bail. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. 2010 June 7;no-no.
90.
Hucklesby, Anthea. Bail or Jail - The Practical Operation of the Bail Act 1976. 1996;23. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jlsocty23&id=221&collection=journals&index=journals/jlsocty#221
91.
Brooks-Gordon, Belinda, Freeman, Michael D. A. Law and psychology [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199211395.001.0001
92.
Association of American Medical Colleges. Academic medicine. [Philadelphia, Pa.]: Hanley & Belfus;
93.
Coderre S, Mandin H, Harasym PH, Fick GH. Diagnostic reasoning strategies and diagnostic success. Medical Education. 2003 Aug;37(8):695–703.
94.
Custers et al. (1996). Available from: http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-3.10.0b/ovidweb.cgi?WebLinkFrameset=1&S=DEHPFPMEAADDPNMENCNKEHLBBJLGAA00&returnUrl=ovidweb.cgi%3fMain%2bSearch%2bPage%3d1%26S%3dDEHPFPMEAADDPNMENCNKEHLBBJLGAA00&directlink=http%3a%2f%2fgraphics.tx.ovid.com%2fovftpdfs%2fFPDDNCLBEHMEAA00%2ffs046%2fovft%2flive%2fgv023%2f00001888%2f00001888-199610000-00044.pdf&filename=Mental representations of medical diagnostic knowledge%3a a review.&link_from=jb.search.37%7c1&pdf_key=FPDDNCLBEHMEAA00&pdf_index=/fs046/ovft/live/gv023/00001888/00001888-199610000-00044&D=ovft&link_set=jb.search.37|1|sl_10|search|jb.search.37.38|0
95.
Arthur S. Elstein and Alan Schwarz. Evidence Base Of Clinical Diagnosis: Clinical Problem Solving And Diagnostic Decision Making: Selective Review Of The Cognitive Literature. BMJ: British Medical Journal [Internet]. BMJ Publishing Group; 2002;324(7339):729–732. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25227815
96.
A Kushniruk, V Patel, A Marley. Small worlds and medical expertise: implications for medical cognition and knowledge engineering. International Journal of Medical Informatics. 1998 May;49(3):255–271.
97.
Chapman GB. The psychology of medical decision making. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making [Internet]. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley InterScience; 2008. p. 585–603. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470752937.ch29
98.
Bettman JR, Luce MF, Payne JW. Constructive Consumer Choice Processes. Journal of Consumer Research. 1998 Dec;25(3):187–217.
99.
Iyengar SS, Lepper MR. When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology [Internet]. 2000;79(6):995–1006. Available from: http://ovidsp.dc1.ovid.com/sp-3.33.0b/ovidweb.cgi?QS2=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
100.
Scheibehenne B, Greifeneder R, Todd PM. Can There Ever Be Too Many Options? A Meta‐Analytic Review of Choice Overload. Journal of Consumer Research. 2010 Oct;37(3):409–425.
101.
Reason-based choice %u2606. Cognition [Internet]. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001002779390034S
