[1]
d’Agostino, B. 1991. Military Organisation and social structure in Archaic Etruria. The Greek city: from Homer to Alexander. Clarendon Press. 59–82.
[2]
d’Agostino, B. 1991. The Italian perspective on theoretical archaeology. Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades. Routledge. 52–64.
[3]
Alan P. Sullivan, III 1989. The Technology of Ceramic Reuse: Formation Processes and Archaeological Evidence. World Archaeology. 21, 1 (1989), 101–114.
[4]
Alcock, S.E. et al. 1994. Intensive survey, agricultural practices and the classical landscape of Greece. Classical Greece: ancient histories and modern archaeologies. Cambridge University Press. 137–170.
[5]
Alcock, Susan E. and Cherry, John F. 2004. Side-by-side survey: comparative regional studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxbow.
[6]
Allison, P.M. 1991. Artefact Assemblages: Not the Pompeii Premise. Papers of the fourth Conference of Italian archaeology. Accordia Research Centre. 49–56.
[7]
Allison, P.M. 1997. Artefact distribution and spatial function in Pompeian houses. The Roman family in Italy: status, sentiment, space. Humanities Research Centre. 321–354.
[8]
Allison, P.M. Introduction. The archaeology of household activities / edited by Penelope M. Allison. 1–18.
[9]
Allison, P.M. Labels for Ladles: Interpreting the material culture of Roman Householdsby Penelope M. Allison. The archaeology of household activities / edited by Penelope M. Allison. 57–77.
[10]
Andrews, G. and English Heritage 1991. Management of archaeological projects. English Heritage.
[11]
Antonaccio, C. 2001. Ethnicity and Colonization. Ancient perceptions of Greek ethnicity. Center for Hellenic Studies, Trustees for Harvard University. 113–157.
[12]
Banning, E. 2000. Research design and sampling. The archaeologist’s laboratory: the analysis of archaeological data. London. 73–92.
[13]
Barker, Graeme et al. 1995. A Mediterranean valley: landscape archaeology and Annales History in the Biferno Valley. Leicester University Press.
[14]
Barker, Graeme et al. 1996. Farming the desert: the UNESCO Libyan Valleys Archaeological Survey. UNESCO.
[15]
Barker, Graeme et al. 1991. Roman landscapes: archaeological survey in the Mediterranean region. British School at Rome.
[16]
Barrett, J. 2001. Agency, the duality of structure and the problem of the archaeological record. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 141–164.
[17]
Belcher, M. et al. 1999. Analyzing Rome’s hinterland. Geographical information systems and landscape archaeology. Oxbow. 95–101.
[18]
Bérard, Claude 1989. A city of images: iconography and society in ancient Greece. Princeton University Press.
[19]
Biers, W.R. 1992. Art, artefacts, and chronology in classical archaeology. Routledge.
[20]
Bietti Sestieri, Anna Maria 1992. The iron age community of Osteria dell’Osa: a study of socio-political development in central Tyrrhenian Italy. Cambridge University Press.
[21]
Binford, L. 1968. Archaeological perspectives. New perspectives in archaeology. Aldine. 78–104.
[22]
Binford, L.R. 1964. A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design. American Antiquity. 29, 4 (1964), 425–441.
[23]
Bintliff, J. L. 1991. The Annales school and archaeology. Leicester University Press.
[24]
Bintliff, J.L. 1999. Settlement and territory. Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. Routledge. 505–545.
[25]
Blinkhorn, P.W. and Cumberpatch, C.G. The Interpretation of Artefacts and the Tyranny of the Field Archaeologist. Assemblage: the Sheffield graduate journal of archaeology. 4.
[26]
Bon, S.E. 1997. A city frozen in time or a site in perpetual motion? Formation processes at Pompeii. Sequence and space in Pompeii. Oxbow Books. 7–12.
[27]
Bourdieu, P. 1973. The Berber house or the world reversed. Rules and meanings: the anthropology of everyday knowledge : selected readings. Penguin Education. 98–110.
[28]
Bourdieu, Pierre and Nice, Richard 1977. Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.
[29]
Bowkett, L. et al. 2001. Introduction. Classical archaeology in the field: approaches. Bristol Classical Press. 1–10.
[30]
Bowkett, L. et al. 2001. The development of Classical Archaeology. Classical archaeology in the field: approaches. Bristol Classical Press. 11–25.
[31]
Bradley, R. and Fulford, M. 1980. Sherd size in the analysis of occupation debris. Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology. 17, (1980), 85–94.
[32]
Ceserani, G. 2008. Wilamowitz and stratigraphy in 1873. A case study in the history of archaeology’s ‘Great Divide’. Archives, ancestors, practices: archaeology in the light of its history. Berghahn Books. 75–87.
[33]
Cherry, J. 1987. Power in space: archaeological and geographical studies of the state. Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. Basil Blackwell. 146–172.
[34]
Childe, V.G. 1960. What happened in history. M. Parrish.
[35]
Clarke, D. 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity. 47, 185 (Mar. 1973), 6–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X0003461X.
[36]
Clarke, D. 1973. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity. 47, 185 (Mar. 1973), 6–18. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X0003461X.
[37]
Cleuziou, S. et al. 1991. The use of Theory in French Archaeology. Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades. Routledge. 91–128.
[38]
Conkey, M.W. and Gero, J.M. 1997. Programme to practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 26, 1 (1997), 411–437. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411.
[39]
Cool, H.E.M. 2002. An overview of the small finds from Catterick. Cataractonium: Roman Catterick and its hinterland : excavations and research, 1958-1997. Council for British Archaeology. 24–43.
[40]
Cool, H.E.M. and Baxter, M.J. 2002. Exploring Romano-British finds assemblages. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 21, 4 (2002), 365–380. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00168.
[41]
Crummy, N. 2007. Six honest serving men: a basic methodology for the study of small finds conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. Roman finds: context and theory : proceedings of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. Oxbow Books. 59–66.
[42]
Cunliffe, B. 1976. Hill-Forts and oppida in Britain. Problems in economic and social archaeology. Duckworth. 343–358.
[43]
Cuozzo, M. 1994. Patterns of Organisation and Funerary Customs in the Cemetery of Pontecagnano (Salerno) During the Orientalising Period. Journal of European Archaeology. 2, 2 (Sep. 1994), 263–298. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1179/096576694800719157.
[44]
Cuozzo, M.A. 2007. Ancient Campania. Cultural interaction, political borders and geographical boundaries. Ancient Italy: regions without boundaries. University of Exeter Press. 224–267.
[45]
Díaz-Andreu, M. 2014. Nationalism and Archaeology in Europe. Routledge.
[46]
Diaz-Andreu, M. and Lucy, S. 2005. Introduction. The archaeology of identity: approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion. Routledge. 1–13.
[47]
Dietler, M. and Herbich, I. 1998. Habitus, techniques, style: an integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture and boundaries. The archaeology of social boundaries. Smithsonian Institution Press. 232–263.
[48]
Dobres, M.-A. and Robb, J.E. 2000. Agency in archaeology: paradigm or platitude? Agency in archaeology. Routledge. 3–17.
[49]
van Dommelen, P. 2001. Cultural imaginings. Punic tradition and local identity in Roman Republican Sardinia. Italy and the west: comparative issues in Romanization. Oxbow. 68–84.
[50]
van Dommelen, P. 1998. Punic persistence: colonialism and cultural identity in Roman Sardinia. Cultural identity in the Roman Empire. Routledge. 25–48.
[51]
Dyson, S.L. 1981. A Classical Archaeologist’s Response to the ‘New Archaeology’. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. 242, 242 (1981), 7–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1356543.
[52]
Dyson, S.L. 1993. From New to New Age Archaeology: Archaeological Theory and Classical Archaeology-A 1990s Perspective. American Journal of Archaeology. 97, 2 (1993), 195–206. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/505656.
[53]
Dyson, S.L. 2006. In pursuit of ancient pasts: a history of classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Yale University Press.
[54]
Dyson, S.L. 1989. The role of ideology and institutions in shaping classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Tracing archaeology’s past: the historiography of archaeology. Southern Illinois University Press. 127–135.
[55]
Fitzjohn, M. 2007. A cognitive approach to an upland landscape. Uplands of ancient Sicily and Calabria: the archaeology of landscape revisited. Accordia Research Institute. 143–155.
[56]
Flannery, Kent V. 1976. The early Mesoamerican village. Academic Press.
[57]
Flannery, Kent V. 1976. The early Mesoamerican village. Academic Press.
[58]
Flannery, K.V. 1976. Analysis on the household level/The Early Mesoamerican House. The early Mesoamerican village. Academic Press. 13–24.
[59]
Flannery, K.V. 1976. Sampling on the Regional Level. The early Mesoamerican village. Academic Press. 131–160.
[60]
Fotiadis, M. 1997. Cultural identity and regional archaeological projects. Archaeological Dialogues. 4, 01 (May 1997), 102–113. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203800000933.
[61]
Gardner, A. 2008. Agency. Handbook of archaeological theories. 95–108.
[62]
Gardner, A. 2007. Artefacts, contexts, and the archaeology of social practicess of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. Roman finds: context and theory : proceedings of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. Oxbow Books. 128–139.
[63]
Gardner, Andrew 2007. An archaeology of identity: soldiers and society in late Roman Britain. Left Coast Press.
[64]
Gell, A. 1998. The problem defined. Art and agency: an anthropological theory. Clarendon Press. 1–11.
[65]
Giddens, Anthony 1986. The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press.
[66]
Given, M. 1998. Inventing the Eteocypriots: Imperialist Archaeology and the Manipulation of Ethnic Identity. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology. 11, 1 (Aug. 1998), 3–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1558/jmea.v11i1.3.
[67]
Grahame, M. 2007. Public and private in the Roman house: the spatial order of the Casa del Fauno. Roman finds: context and theory : proceedings of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. Oxbow Books. 137–164.
[68]
Grahame, Mark 2000. Reading space: social interaction and identity in the houses of Roman Pompeii : a syntactical approach to the analysis and interpretation of built space. Archaeopress.
[69]
Green, F.J. and Lockyear, K. 1994. Seeds, sherds and samples: site formation processes at the Waitrose site, Romsey. Whither environmental archaeology?. Oxbow. 91–104.
[70]
Hall, J.M. 1998. Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 8, 02 (1998), 265–283. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001864.
[71]
Hall, Jonathan M. 2002. Hellenicity: between ethnicity and culture. University of Chicago Press.
[72]
Halstead, P. et al. 1978. Behavioural archaeology and refuse patterns: A case study. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 11, 2 (1978), 118–131. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.1978.9965308.
[73]
Hamilakis, Y. 2012. Are We Postcolonial Yet? Tales from the Battlefield. Archaeologies. 8, 1 (2012), 67–76. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-012-9200-5.
[74]
Hamilakis, Y. 2008. Decolonizing Greek archaeology: indigenous archaeologies, modernist archaeology and the post-colonial critique. A singular antiquity: archaeology and Hellenic identity in twentieth-century Greece. Benaki Museum. 273–284.
[75]
Hamilakis, Y. 2011. Museums of oblivion. Antiquity. 85, 328 (Jun. 2011), 625–629. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00068010.
[76]
Hamilakis, Y. and Yalouri, E. 1996. Antiquities as symbolic capital in modern Greek society. Antiquity. 70, 267 (Mar. 1996), 117–129. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00082934.
[77]
Hamilakis, Yannis 2007. The nation and its ruins: antiquity, archaeology, and national imagination in Greece. Oxford University Press.
[78]
Hassan, F.A. 1997. Beyond the surface: comments on Hodder’s ‘reflexive excavation methodology’. Antiquity. 71, 274 (Dec. 1997), 1020–1025. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00085938.
[79]
Hawkes, C. 1954. Archaeological theory and method: some suggestions from the Old World. American Anthropologist. 56, 2 (1954), 155–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1954.56.2.02a00660.
[80]
Hayden, B. and Cannon, A. 1983. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2, 2 (1983), 117–163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7.
[81]
Hayes, J.W. 2000. The current state of Roman ceramic studies in Mediterranean survey, or handling pottery from surveys. Extracting meaning from ploughsoil assemblages. Oxbow. 105–109.
[82]
Higgs, E.S. and Vita-Finzi, C. 1972. Prehistoric Economies: a territorial approach. Papers in economic prehistory: studies by members and associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. Cambridge University Press. 27–36.
[83]
Hingley, R. 2010. Cultural Diversity and Unity: empire and Rome. Material culture and social identities in the ancient world. Cambridge University Press. 54–75.
[84]
Hobsbawm, E. and Ranger, T. eds. 2012. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge University Press.
[85]
Hodder, I. 1997. ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible’: towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity. 71, 273 (Sep. 1997), 691–700. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00085410.
[86]
Hodder, I. 2003. Contextual archaeology. Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. 156–205.
[87]
Hodder, I. 1999. Crises in Global Archaeology. The archaeological process: an introduction. Blackwell. 1–19.
[88]
Hodder, I. 2012. Introduction: Contemporary Theoretical Debate in Archaeology. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 1–14.
[89]
Hodder, I. 1998. Whose rationality? A response to Fekri Hassan. Antiquity. 72, 275 (Mar. 1998), 213–217. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00086439.
[90]
Hodder, I. and Hudson, S. The problem. Reading the past : current approaches to interpretation in archaeology / Ian Hodder and Scott Hutson. 1–19.
[91]
Horden, Peregrine and Purcell, Nicholas 2000. The corrupting sea: a study of Mediterranean history. Blackwell.
[92]
Ian Hodder 1982. Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. I. Hodder, ed. Cambridge University Press. 1–16.
[93]
Izzet, V. 2007. Etruria and the Etruscans. Recent approaches. Ancient Italy: regions without boundaries. University of Exeter Press. 114–130.
[94]
Izzet, V. 1998. Holding a mirror to Etruscan gender. Gender and Italian archaeology: challenging the stereotypes. Accordia Research Institute. 209–227.
[95]
James Whitley 1991. Social Diversity in Dark Age Greece. The Annual of the British School at Athens. 86, (1991), 341–365.
[96]
Jansen, G.C.M. 2000. Systems for the disposal of waste and excreta in Roman cities. The situation in Pompeii, Herculaneum and Ostia. Sordes urbis: la eliminación de residuos en la ciudad romana : actas de la Reunión de Roma (15-16 de noviembre de 1996). L’Erma di Bretschneider. 37–50.
[97]
Johnson, M. 2010. Common sense is not enough. Archaeological theory: an introduction. Wiley-Blackwell. 1–12.
[98]
Johnson, M. 1999. Culture as system. Archaeological theory: an introduction. Blackwell. 64–84.
[99]
Johnson, M. 2010. The ‘New Archaeology’. Archaeological theory: an introduction. Wiley-Blackwell. 12–34.
[100]
Johnson, Matthew 2010. Archaeological theory: an introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
[101]
Johnson, Matthew 1999. Archaeological theory: an introduction. Blackwell.
[102]
Jonathan Friedman The Past in the Future: History and the Politics of Identity. American Anthropologist. 94, 4, 837–859.
[103]
Jones, S. 1996. Discourses of identity in the interpretation of the past. Cultural identity and archaeology: the construction of European communities. Routledge. 62–80.
[104]
Knapp, A.B. and Ashmore, W. 1999. Archaeological Landscapes: Constructed, Conceptualized, Ideational. Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. Blackwell Publishers. 1–30.
[105]
Knapp, A.B. and Meskell, L. 1997. Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 7, 02 (1997), 183–204. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001931.
[106]
Kotsakis, K. 1991. The powerful past: theoretical trends in Greek archaeology. Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades. Routledge. 65–90.
[107]
Kurtz, D.C. 1985. Beazley and the connoisseurship of Greek vases. Greek vases in the J. Paul Getty Museum: Vol.2. J. Paul Getty Museum. 237–250.
[108]
LaMotta, V.M. and Schiffer, M.B. The formation processes of house floor assemblages. The archaeology of household activities / edited by Penelope M. Allison. 19–29.
[109]
Laurence, Ray 1994. Roman Pompeii: space and society. Routledge.
[110]
Lewis R. Binford 1981. Behavioral Archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise’. Journal of Anthropological Research. 37, 3 (1981), 195–208.
[111]
Liebschuetz, W. 2000. Rubbish disposal in Greek and Roman Cities. Sordes urbis: la eliminación de residuos en la ciudad romana : actas de la Reunión de Roma (15-16 de noviembre de 1996). L’Erma di Bretschneider. 51–62.
[112]
Lissarrague, F. 1994. Epiktetos egraphsen: the Writing on the Cup. Art and text in ancient Greek culture. Cambridge University Press. 12–27.
[113]
Lock, G. et al. 1999. Towards a methodology for modeling surface survey data: the Sangro Valley Project. Geographical information systems and landscape archaeology. Oxbow. 55–63.
[114]
Lockyear, K. 2000. Site Finds in Roman Britain: A Comparison of Techniques. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 19, 4 (2000), 397–423. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00118.
[115]
Lockyear, Kris 2007. Patterns and process in late Roman Republican coin hoards, 157-2 BC. Archaeopress.
[116]
Lowenthal, D. 1998. The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. Cambridge University Press.
[117]
Lucas, G. Splitting objects. Critical approaches to fieldwork : contemporary and historical archaeological practice / Gavin Lucas. 64–106.
[118]
Lynn Meskell 2002. The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 31, (2002), 279–301.
[119]
M. Shanks, C. Tilley 1982. Ideology, Symbolic Power and Ritual Communication: A Reinterpretation of Neolithic Mortuary Practices. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. I. Hodder, ed. Cambridge University Press. 129–161.
[120]
Malkin, I. 2004. Postcolonial Concepts and Ancient Greek Colonization. MLQ: Modern Language Quarterly. 65, 3 (2004), 341–364.
[121]
Marchand, Suzanne L. 1996. Down from Olympus: archaeology and philhellenism in Germany, 1750-1970. Princeton University Press.
[122]
Mattingly, D. 2000. Methods of collection, recording and quantification. Extracting meaning from ploughsoil assemblages. Oxbow. 5–15.
[123]
Mattingly, D. and Witcher, R. 2004. Mapping the Roman world: the contribution of field survey data. Side-by-side survey: comparative regional studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxbow. 173–188.
[124]
Mauss, M. 1979. Body Techniques. Sociology and psychology: essays. Routledge and Kegan Paul. 95–123.
[125]
Meskell (ed.), L. 2002. Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Routledge.
[126]
Meskell, L. 2001. Archaeologies of identity. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 187–213.
[127]
Meskell, L. 2001. Archaeologies of identity. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 187–213.
[128]
Meskell, L. 1996. The somatization of archaeology: Institutions, discourses, corporeality. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 29, 1 (1996), 1–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.1996.9965595.
[129]
Meskell, Lynn 1999. Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Blackwell.
[130]
Michael Dietler ‘Our Ancestors the Gauls’: Archaeology, Ethnic Nationalism, and the Manipulation of Celtic Identity in Modern Europe. American Anthropologist. 96, 3, 584–605.
[131]
Michael Fotiadis Modernity and the Past-Still-Present: Politics of Time in the Birth of Regional Archaeological Projects in Greece. American Journal of Archaeology. 99, 1, 59–78.
[132]
Michael Vickers Value and Simplicity: Eighteenth-Century Taste and the Study of Greek Vases. Past & Present. 116, 98–137.
[133]
Millett, M. 2000. Dating, quantifying and utilizing pottery assemblages from surface survey. Extracting meaning from ploughsoil assemblages. Oxbow. 53–59.
[134]
Millett, M. 2007. Experiments in the analysis of finds deposition at Shiptonthorpe: a retrospect. Roman finds: context and theory : proceedings of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. Oxbow Books. 100–105.
[135]
Milne, G. 1992. The archaeologist as alchemist. From Roman basilica to medieval market: archaeology in action in the city of London. HMSO. 51–59.
[136]
Momigliano, A. 1950. Ancient History and the Antiquarian. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. 13, 3/4 (1950), 285–315. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/750215.
[137]
Moore, H. 1994. Bodies on the move: gender, power and material culture. A passion for difference: essays in anthropology and gender. Polity. 71–85.
[138]
Morgan, C. 1992. Ethnicity and early Greek states: historical and material perspectives. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society. 37, (Jan. 1992), 131–163. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500001565.
[139]
Morgan, C. and Whitelaw, T. 1991. Pots and Politics: Ceramic Evidence for the Rise of the Argive State. American Journal of Archaeology. 95, 1 (1991), 79–108. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/505158.
[140]
Morris, I. 2000. Archaeologies of Greece. Archaeology as cultural history: words and things in Iron Age Greece. Blackwell. 37–76.
[141]
Morris, I. 2003. Archaeology and gender ideologies in early Archaic Greece. Sex and difference in ancient Greece and Rome. Edinburgh University Press. 264–275.
[142]
Morris, I. 2000. Archaeology as cultural history. Archaeology as cultural history: words and things in Iron Age Greece. Blackwell. 3–36.
[143]
Morris, I. 1987. Burial and ancient society: the rise of the Greek city-state. Cambridge University Press.
[144]
Morris, I. 1997. Periodization and the heroes: Inventing a dark age. Inventing ancient culture: historicism, periodization and the ancient world. Routledge. 96–131.
[145]
Morris, I. 1992. The anthropology of a dead world. Death-ritual and social structure in classical antiquity. Cambridge University Press. 1–30.
[146]
Morris, I. 2000. The past, the east and the hero of Lefkandi. Archaeology as cultural history: words and things in Iron Age Greece. Blackwell. 195–256.
[147]
Nevett, Lisa C. 1999. House and society in the ancient Greek world. Cambridge University Press.
[148]
Odermatt, P. 1996. Built heritage and the politics of (re) presentation. Archaeological Dialogues. 3, 02 (1996), 95–119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203800000660.
[149]
Orton, C. and Hughes, M. 2013. Pottery in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press.
[150]
Orton, C.R. 2000. Covering the ground. Sampling in archaeology. Cambridge University Press. 67–111.
[151]
Orton, C.R. 1986. Two useful parameters for pottery research. Computer applications in archaeology 1985: proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Methods, Institute of Archaeology, London, March 29-30, 1985. University of London, Institute of Archaeology. 114–120.
[152]
Osborne, R. 1994. Looking on Greek style: does the sculpted girl speak to women too. Classical Greece: ancient histories and modern archaeologies. Cambridge University Press. 81–96.
[153]
Osborne, R. 2006. W(h)ither Orientalization? Debating orientalization: multidisciplinary approaches to processes of change in the ancient Mediterranean. Equinox. 153–158.
[154]
Osborne, R. and Alcock, S. 2007. Introduction. Classical archaeology. Blackwell. 1–8.
[155]
Patty Jo Watson and Michael Fotiadis The Razor’s Edge: Symbolic-Structuralist Archeology and the Expansion of Archeological Inference. American Anthropologist. 92, 3, 613–629.
[156]
Paul Sant Cassia Tradition, Tourism and Memory in Malta. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 5, 2, 247–263.
[157]
Payne, S. 1972. Partial recovery and sample bias: The results of some sieving experiments. Papers in economic prehistory: studies by members and associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. Cambridge University Press. 49–64.
[158]
Peña, J.T. 2007. Roman Pottery in the Archaeological Record. Cambridge University Press.
[159]
Peter E. Siegel and Peter G. Roe 1986. Shipibo Archaeo-Ethnography: Site Formation Processes and Archaeological Interpretation. World Archaeology. 18, 1 (1986), 96–115.
[160]
Peter van Dommelen Colonial Constructs: Colonialism and Archaeology in the Mediterranean. World Archaeology. 28, 3, 305–323.
[161]
Pierre Nora Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations. 26, 7–24.
[162]
Rackham, O. 1991. Ancient landscapes. The Greek city: from Homer to Alexander. Clarendon Press. 85–111.
[163]
Rautman, Alison E. and Gender and Archaeology Conference 2000. Reading the body: representations and remains in the archaeological record. University of Pennsylvania Press.
[164]
Redman, C.L. Multistage Fieldwork and Analytical Techniques. American Antiquity. 38, 1, 61–79.
[165]
Redman, C.L. Surface Collection, Sampling, and Research Design: A Retrospective. American Antiquity. 52, 2, 249–265.
[166]
Reece, R. 1996. The interpretation of site finds — a review. Coin finds and coin use in the Roman world: the thirteenth Oxford Symposium on Coinage and Monetary History, 25.-27.3.1993 : a NATO advanced research workshop. Gebr. Mann Verlag. 341–355.
[167]
Renfrew, A.C. 1977. Space, time and polity. The evolution of social systems: proceedings of a meeting of the Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects held at the Institute of Archaeology, London University. Duckworth. 89–112.
[168]
Renfrew, C. 1984. The multiplier effect in action. Approaches to social archaeology. Harvard University Press. 283–308.
[169]
Rowlands, M. 1994. The politics of identity in archaeology. Social construction of the past: representation as power. Routledge. 129–143.
[170]
Schiffer, M.B. 1972. Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity. 37, 2 (1972), 156–165. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/278203.
[171]
Schiffer, M.B. 1972. Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity. 37, 2 (1972), 156–165.
[172]
Schiffer, Michael B. 1987. Formation processes of the archaeological record. University of New Mexico Press.
[173]
Schnapp, A. 1989. Eros the Hunter. A city of images: iconography and society in ancient Greece. Princeton University Press. 71–87.
[174]
Schnapp, A. 1996. The discovery of the past: the origins of archaeology. British Museum Press.
[175]
Sewell, W.H. 2005. The Concept(s) of Culture. Logics of history: social theory and social transformation. University of Chicago Press. 152–174.
[176]
Shanks, M. 1995. Cities and sanctuaries, art and archaeology: roots in the past. Classical archaeology of Greece: experiences of the discipline. Routledge. 21–51.
[177]
Shanks, M. 1995. Rudiments of a social archaeology (Chapter 5). Classical archaeology of Greece: experiences of the discipline. Routledge. 118–153.
[178]
Shanks, M. 1996. Style and the design of a perfume jar from an Archaic Greek city state. Contemporary archaeology in theory: [a reader]. Blackwell. 364–393.
[179]
Shanks, M. and Hodder, I. 1994. Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies. Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. Routledge. 3–28.
[180]
Shanks, M. and Tilley, C. 1987. The individual and the social. Social theory and archaeology. Polity in association with Blackwell. 61–78.
[181]
Shanks, Michael and Tilley, Christopher Y. 1987. Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
[182]
Snodgrass, A. 1987. The first figure scenes in Greek art. An archaeology of Greece: the present state and future scope of a discipline. University of California Press. 132–169.
[183]
Snodgrass, A. 1987. The health of a discipline. An archaeology of Greece: the present state and future scope of a discipline. University of California Press. 1–36.
[184]
Snodgrass, A.M. 1985. The New Archaeology and the Classical Archaeologist. American Journal of Archaeology. 89, 1 (1985), 31–37. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/504768.
[185]
Snodgrass, Anthony M. 1980. Archaic Greece: the age of experiment. University of California Press.
[186]
Sofaer, J.R. 2006. The Body as Material Culture: a Theoretical Osteoarchaeology. Cambridge University Press.
[187]
Sparkes, B.A. 1996. The red and the black: studies in Greek pottery. Routledge.
[188]
Stewart, A. 1996. Reflections. Sexuality in ancient art: Near East, Egypt, Greece and Italy. Cambridge University Press. 136–154.
[189]
Tanner, J. 2006. Culture, social structure and artistic agency in Classical Greece. The invention of art history in Ancient Greece: religion, society and artistic rationalisation. Cambridge University Press. 141–204.
[190]
Tarlow, Sarah et al. 2002. Thinking through the body: archaeologies of corporeality. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
[191]
Terrenato, N. 2004. "Sample size matters! The paradox of global trends and local surveys. Side-by-side survey: comparative regional studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxbow. 36–48.
[192]
Terrenato, N. 2005. ‘Start the revolution without me’: recent debates in Italian Classical Archaeology. Papers in Italian archaeology VI: communities and settlements from the Neolithic to the early Medieval period : proceedings of the 6th Conference of Italian Archaeology held at the Univrsity of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, the Netherlands, April 15-17, 2003. Archaeopress. 39–43.
[193]
Terrenato, N. 2002. The innocents and the sceptics: ANTIQUITY and classical archaeology. Antiquity. 76, 294 (2002), 1104–1111.
[194]
Terrenato, N. 2000. The visibility of sites and the interpretation of field survey results: towards an analysis of incomplete distributions. Extracting meaning from ploughsoil assemblages. Oxbow. 60–71.
[195]
Thomas, J. 2001. Archaeologies of place and landscape. Archaeological theory today. Polity. 165–186.
[196]
Thomas, J. 1994. Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s. Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. Routledge. 343–362.
[197]
Tilley, C. 1994. Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives. A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. Berg. 7–34.
[198]
Trigger, B.G. 1978. Current trends in American archaeology. Time and traditions: essays in archaeological interpretation. Edinburgh University Press. 2–18.
[199]
Tyers, P. 1996. Sources for the study of Roman pottery. Roman pottery in Britain. Batsford. 24–35.
[200]
Vives-Ferrándiz Sánchez, J. 2007. Colonial encounters and the negotiation of identities in south-east Iberia. Mediterranean crossroads. Pierides Foundation. 537–562.
[201]
W. Raymond Wood and Donald Lee Johnson 1978. A Survey of Disturbance Processes in Archaeological Site Formation. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1, (1978), 315–381.
[202]
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew 1994. Houses and society in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Princeton University Press.
[203]
Whitley, J. 1997. Beazley as theorist. Antiquity. 71, 271 (Mar. 1997), 40–47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00084520.
[204]
Whitley, J. 2001. Introduction: Classical Archaeology and its objects. The archaeology of ancient Greece. Cambridge University Press. 3–16.
[205]
Whitley, James 1991. Style and society in dark age Greece: the changing face of a pre-literate society, 1100-700 B.C. Cambridge University Press.
[206]
Woolf, G. 1998. Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul. Cambridge University Press.
[207]
Woolf, Greg and Gosden, C. 1997. Beyond Romans and natives. World Archaeology. 28, 3 (1997), 339–350.
[208]
Yalouri, Eleana 2001. The Acropolis: global fame, local claim. Berg.
[209]
Yates, T. 1992. Frameworks for an archaeology of the body. Interpretative archaeology. Berg. 31–72.
[210]
Yiannis Papadakis Greek Cypriot Narratives of History and Collective Identity: Nationalism as a Contested Process. American Ethnologist. 25, 2, 149–165.
[211]
1993. Interpretative Archaeology. Bloomsbury Academic.
