1.
Johnson, M.: Common sense is not enough. In: Archaeological theory: an introduction. pp. 1–12. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester (2010).
2.
Morris, I.: Archaeologies of Greece. In: Archaeology as cultural history: words and things in Iron Age Greece. pp. 37–76. Blackwell, Malden, Mass (2000).
3.
Whitley, J.: Introduction: Classical Archaeology and its objects. In: The archaeology of ancient Greece. pp. 3–16. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001).
4.
Snodgrass, A.: The health of a discipline. In: An archaeology of Greece: the present state and future scope of a discipline. pp. 1–36. University of California Press, Berkeley (1987).
5.
Biers, W.R.: Art, artefacts, and chronology in classical archaeology. Routledge, London (1992).
6.
Hodder, I.: Introduction: Contemporary Theoretical Debate in Archaeology. In: Archaeological theory today. pp. 1–14. Polity, Cambridge (2012).
7.
Hodder, I., Hudson, S.: The problem. In: Reading the past : current approaches to interpretation in archaeology / Ian Hodder and Scott Hutson. pp. 1–19.
8.
Hodder, I.: Crises in Global Archaeology. In: The archaeological process: an introduction. pp. 1–19. Blackwell, Oxford (1999).
9.
Morris, I.: Periodization and the heroes: Inventing a dark age. In: Inventing ancient culture: historicism, periodization and the ancient world. pp. 96–131. Routledge, London (1997).
10.
Hawkes, C.: Archaeological theory and method: some suggestions from the Old World. American Anthropologist. 56, 155–168 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1954.56.2.02a00660.
11.
Osborne, R., Alcock, S.: Introduction. In: Classical archaeology. pp. 1–8. Blackwell, Malden, MA (2007).
12.
Terrenato, N.: The innocents and the sceptics: ANTIQUITY and classical archaeology. Antiquity. 76, 1104–1111 (2002).
13.
Shanks, M.: Cities and sanctuaries, art and archaeology: roots in the past. In: Classical archaeology of Greece: experiences of the discipline. pp. 21–51. Routledge, London (1995).
14.
Dyson, S.L.: The role of ideology and institutions in shaping classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In: Tracing archaeology’s past: the historiography of archaeology. pp. 127–135. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Ill (1989).
15.
Kurtz, D.C.: Beazley and the connoisseurship of Greek vases. In: Greek vases in the J. Paul Getty Museum: Vol.2. pp. 237–250. J. Paul Getty Museum, Malibu, Calif (1985).
16.
Whitley, J.: Beazley as theorist. Antiquity. 71, 40–47 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00084520.
17.
Ceserani, G.: Wilamowitz and stratigraphy in 1873. A case study in the history of archaeology’s ‘Great Divide’. In: Archives, ancestors, practices: archaeology in the light of its history. pp. 75–87. Berghahn Books, New York (2008).
18.
Childe, V.G.: What happened in history. M. Parrish, London (1960).
19.
Clarke, D.: Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity. 47, 6–18 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X0003461X.
20.
Dyson, S.L.: In pursuit of ancient pasts: a history of classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Yale University Press, New Haven (2006).
21.
Momigliano, A.: Ancient History and the Antiquarian. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. 13, 285–315 (1950). https://doi.org/10.2307/750215.
22.
Sparkes, B.A.: The red and the black: studies in Greek pottery. Routledge, London (1996).
23.
Schnapp, A.: The discovery of the past: the origins of archaeology. British Museum Press, London (1996).
24.
Michael Vickers: Value and Simplicity: Eighteenth-Century Taste and the Study of Greek Vases. Past & Present. 98–137.
25.
Dyson, S.L.: A Classical Archaeologist’s Response to the ‘New Archaeology’. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. 242, 7–13 (1981). https://doi.org/10.2307/1356543.
26.
Johnson, M.: The ‘New Archaeology’. In: Archaeological theory: an introduction. pp. 12–34. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester (2010).
27.
Clarke, D.: Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity. 47, 6–18 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X0003461X.
28.
Shanks, M.: Rudiments of a social archaeology (Chapter 5). In: Classical archaeology of Greece: experiences of the discipline. pp. 118–153. Routledge, London (1995).
29.
Snodgrass, A.M.: The New Archaeology and the Classical Archaeologist. American Journal of Archaeology. 89, 31–37 (1985). https://doi.org/10.2307/504768.
30.
Binford, L.: Archaeological perspectives. In: New perspectives in archaeology. pp. 78–104. Aldine, Chicago (1968).
31.
Ian Hodder: Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view. In: Hodder, I. (ed.) Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. pp. 1–16. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558252.
32.
Johnson, M.: Culture as system. In: Archaeological theory: an introduction. pp. 64–84. Blackwell, Oxford (1999).
33.
Morgan, C., Whitelaw, T.: Pots and Politics: Ceramic Evidence for the Rise of the Argive State. American Journal of Archaeology. 95, 79–108 (1991). https://doi.org/10.2307/505158.
34.
Morris, I.: Burial and ancient society: the rise of the Greek city-state. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987).
35.
Renfrew, C.: The multiplier effect in action. In: Approaches to social archaeology. pp. 283–308. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (1984).
36.
Snodgrass, Anthony M.: Archaic Greece: the age of experiment. University of California Press, Berkeley, Calif (1980).
37.
Schiffer, M.B.: Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity. 37, 156–165 (1972). https://doi.org/10.2307/278203.
38.
Trigger, B.G.: Current trends in American archaeology. In: Time and traditions: essays in archaeological interpretation. pp. 2–18. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1978).
39.
Whitley, James: Style and society in dark age Greece: the changing face of a pre-literate society, 1100-700 B.C. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1991).
40.
James Whitley: Social Diversity in Dark Age Greece. The Annual of the British School at Athens. 86, 341–365 (1991).
41.
Cherry, J.: Power in space: archaeological and geographical studies of the state. In: Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives. pp. 146–172. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1987).
42.
Thomas, J.: Archaeologies of place and landscape. In: Archaeological theory today. pp. 165–186. Polity, Cambridge (2001).
43.
Horden, Peregrine, Purcell, Nicholas: The corrupting sea: a study of Mediterranean history. Blackwell, Malden, Mass (2000).
44.
Alcock, S.E., Cherry, J.F., Davies, J.L.: Intensive survey, agricultural practices and the classical landscape of Greece. In: Classical Greece: ancient histories and modern archaeologies. pp. 137–170. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994).
45.
Alcock, Susan E., Cherry, John F.: Side-by-side survey: comparative regional studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxbow, Oxford (2004).
46.
Bintliff, J.L.: Settlement and territory. In: Companion encyclopedia of archaeology. pp. 505–545. Routledge, London (1999).
47.
Cunliffe, B.: Hill-Forts and oppida in Britain. In: Problems in economic and social archaeology. pp. 343–358. Duckworth, London (1976).
48.
Fitzjohn, M.: A cognitive approach to an upland landscape. In: Uplands of ancient Sicily and Calabria: the archaeology of landscape revisited. pp. 143–155. Accordia Research Institute, London (2007).
49.
Higgs, E.S., Vita-Finzi, C.: Prehistoric Economies: a territorial approach. In: Papers in economic prehistory: studies by members and associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. pp. 27–36. Cambridge University Press, London (1972).
50.
Knapp, A.B., Ashmore, W.: Archaeological Landscapes: Constructed, Conceptualized, Ideational. In: Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives. pp. 1–30. Blackwell Publishers, Malden, Mass (1999).
51.
Rackham, O.: Ancient landscapes. In: The Greek city: from Homer to Alexander. pp. 85–111. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1991).
52.
Renfrew, A.C.: Space, time and polity. In: The evolution of social systems: proceedings of a meeting of the Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects held at the Institute of Archaeology, London University. pp. 89–112. Duckworth, NW1 [i.e. London] (1977).
53.
Tilley, C.: Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives. In: A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments. pp. 7–34. Berg, Oxford (1994).
54.
Dyson, S.L.: From New to New Age Archaeology: Archaeological Theory and Classical Archaeology-A 1990s Perspective. American Journal of Archaeology. 97, 195–206 (1993). https://doi.org/10.2307/505656.
55.
Johnson, Matthew: Archaeological theory: an introduction. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester (2010).
56.
Morris, I.: Archaeology as cultural history. In: Archaeology as cultural history: words and things in Iron Age Greece. pp. 3–36. Blackwell, Malden, Mass (2000).
57.
Morris, I.: The past, the east and the hero of Lefkandi. In: Archaeology as cultural history: words and things in Iron Age Greece. pp. 195–256. Blackwell, Malden, Mass (2000).
58.
Shanks, M., Hodder, I.: Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies. In: Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past. pp. 3–28. Routledge, London (1994).
59.
Hodder, I.: Contextual archaeology. In: Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology. pp. 156–205 (2003).
60.
Shanks, M.: Style and the design of a perfume jar from an Archaic Greek city state. In: Contemporary archaeology in theory: [a reader]. pp. 364–393. Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass (1996).
61.
M. Shanks, C. Tilley: Ideology, Symbolic Power and Ritual Communication: A Reinterpretation of Neolithic Mortuary Practices. In: Hodder, I. (ed.) Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. pp. 129–161. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1982). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558252.
62.
Shanks, Michael, Tilley, Christopher Y.: Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987).
63.
Snodgrass, A.: The first figure scenes in Greek art. In: An archaeology of Greece: the present state and future scope of a discipline. pp. 132–169. University of California Press, Berkeley (1987).
64.
Interpretative Archaeology. Bloomsbury Academic (1993). https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474214995.
65.
Thomas, J.: Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s. In: Theory in archaeology: a world perspective. pp. 343–362. Routledge, London (1994).
66.
Patty Jo Watson and Michael Fotiadis: The Razor’s Edge: Symbolic-Structuralist Archeology and the Expansion of Archeological Inference. American Anthropologist. 92, 613–629.
67.
d’Agostino, B.: The Italian perspective on theoretical archaeology. In: Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades. pp. 52–64. Routledge, London (1991).
68.
Kotsakis, K.: The powerful past: theoretical trends in Greek archaeology. In: Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades. pp. 65–90. Routledge, London (1991).
69.
Bérard, Claude: A city of images: iconography and society in ancient Greece. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1989).
70.
Schnapp, A.: Eros the Hunter. In: A city of images: iconography and society in ancient Greece. pp. 71–87. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. (1989).
71.
Bintliff, J. L.: The Annales school and archaeology. Leicester University Press, London (1991).
72.
Bietti Sestieri, Anna Maria: The iron age community of Osteria dell’Osa: a study of socio-political development in central Tyrrhenian Italy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992).
73.
Cleuziou, S., Coudart, A., Demoule, J.-P., Schnapp, A.: The use of Theory in French Archaeology. In: Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades. pp. 91–128. Routledge, London (1991).
74.
Cuozzo, M.: Patterns of Organisation and Funerary Customs in the Cemetery of Pontecagnano (Salerno) During the Orientalising Period. Journal of European Archaeology. 2, 263–298 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1179/096576694800719157.
75.
Cuozzo, M.A.: Ancient Campania. Cultural interaction, political borders and geographical boundaries. In: Ancient Italy: regions without boundaries. pp. 224–267. University of Exeter Press, Exeter (2007).
76.
d’Agostino, B.: Military Organisation and social structure in Archaic Etruria. In: The Greek city: from Homer to Alexander. pp. 59–82. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1991).
77.
Izzet, V.: Etruria and the Etruscans. Recent approaches. In: Ancient Italy: regions without boundaries. pp. 114–130. University of Exeter Press, Exeter (2007).
78.
Lissarrague, F.: Epiktetos egraphsen: the Writing on the Cup. In: Art and text in ancient Greek culture. pp. 12–27. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994).
79.
Marchand, Suzanne L.: Down from Olympus: archaeology and philhellenism in Germany, 1750-1970. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J (1996).
80.
Terrenato, N.: ‘Start the revolution without me’: recent debates in Italian Classical Archaeology. In: Papers in Italian archaeology VI: communities and settlements from the Neolithic to the early Medieval period : proceedings of the 6th Conference of Italian Archaeology held at the Univrsity of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, the Netherlands, April 15-17, 2003. pp. 39–43. Archaeopress, Oxford (2005).
81.
Dobres, M.-A., Robb, J.E.: Agency in archaeology: paradigm or platitude? In: Agency in archaeology. pp. 3–17. Routledge, London (2000).
82.
Gardner, A.: Agency. In: Handbook of archaeological theories. pp. 95–108 (2008).
83.
Morris, I.: The anthropology of a dead world. In: Death-ritual and social structure in classical antiquity. pp. 1–30. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992).
84.
Osborne, R.: W(h)ither Orientalization? In: Debating orientalization: multidisciplinary approaches to processes of change in the ancient Mediterranean. pp. 153–158. Equinox, London (2006).
85.
Sewell, W.H.: The Concept(s) of Culture. In: Logics of history: social theory and social transformation. pp. 152–174. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2005).
86.
Shanks, M., Tilley, C.: The individual and the social. In: Social theory and archaeology. pp. 61–78. Polity in association with Blackwell, Cambridge (1987).
87.
Gardner, Andrew: An archaeology of identity: soldiers and society in late Roman Britain. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, Calif (2007).
88.
Gell, A.: The problem defined. In: Art and agency: an anthropological theory. pp. 1–11. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1998).
89.
Tanner, J.: Culture, social structure and artistic agency in Classical Greece. In: The invention of art history in Ancient Greece: religion, society and artistic rationalisation. pp. 141–204. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006).
90.
Barrett, J.: Agency, the duality of structure and the problem of the archaeological record. In: Archaeological theory today. pp. 141–164. Polity, Cambridge (2001).
91.
Bourdieu, P.: The Berber house or the world reversed. In: Rules and meanings: the anthropology of everyday knowledge : selected readings. pp. 98–110. Penguin Education, Harmondsworth (1973).
92.
Bourdieu, Pierre, Nice, Richard: Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1977).
93.
Dietler, M., Herbich, I.: Habitus, techniques, style: an integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture and boundaries. In: The archaeology of social boundaries. pp. 232–263. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington [D.C.] (1998).
94.
Giddens, Anthony: The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Polity Press, Cambridge (1986).
95.
van Dommelen, P.: Punic persistence: colonialism and cultural identity in Roman Sardinia. In: Cultural identity in the Roman Empire. pp. 25–48. Routledge, London (1998).
96.
Meskell, L.: Archaeologies of identity. In: Archaeological theory today. pp. 187–213. Polity, Cambridge (2001).
97.
Hall, J.M.: Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 8, 265–283 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001864.
98.
Vives-Ferrándiz Sánchez, J.: Colonial encounters and the negotiation of identities in south-east Iberia. In: Mediterranean crossroads. pp. 537–562. Pierides Foundation, Athens (2007).
99.
Peter van Dommelen: Colonial Constructs: Colonialism and Archaeology in the Mediterranean. World Archaeology. 28, 305–323.
100.
Antonaccio, C.: Ethnicity and Colonization. In: Ancient perceptions of Greek ethnicity. pp. 113–157. Center for Hellenic Studies, Trustees for Harvard University, Washington, D.C. (2001).
101.
Diaz-Andreu, M., Lucy, S.: Introduction. In: The archaeology of identity: approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion. pp. 1–13. Routledge, London (2005).
102.
Morgan, C.: Ethnicity and early Greek states: historical and material perspectives. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society. 37, 131–163 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0068673500001565.
103.
Given, M.: Inventing the Eteocypriots: Imperialist Archaeology and the Manipulation of Ethnic Identity. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology. 11, 3–29 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1558/jmea.v11i1.3.
104.
Fotiadis, M.: Cultural identity and regional archaeological projects. Archaeological Dialogues. 4, 102–113 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203800000933.
105.
Hingley, R.: Cultural Diversity and Unity: empire and Rome. In: Material culture and social identities in the ancient world. pp. 54–75. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2010).
106.
Jones, S.: Discourses of identity in the interpretation of the past. In: Cultural identity and archaeology: the construction of European communities. pp. 62–80. Routledge, London (1996).
107.
Malkin, I.: Postcolonial Concepts and Ancient Greek Colonization. MLQ: Modern Language Quarterly. 65, 341–364 (2004).
108.
Hall, Jonathan M.: Hellenicity: between ethnicity and culture. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2002).
109.
van Dommelen, P.: Cultural imaginings. Punic tradition and local identity in Roman Republican Sardinia. In: Italy and the west: comparative issues in Romanization. pp. 68–84. Oxbow, Oxford (2001).
110.
Woolf, Greg, Gosden, C.: Beyond Romans and natives. World Archaeology. 28, 339–350 (1997).
111.
Woolf, G.: Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511518614.
112.
Yates, T.: Frameworks for an archaeology of the body. In: Interpretative archaeology. pp. 31–72. Berg, Oxford, UK (1992).
113.
Izzet, V.: Holding a mirror to Etruscan gender. In: Gender and Italian archaeology: challenging the stereotypes. pp. 209–227. Accordia Research Institute, London (1998).
114.
Meskell, L.: Archaeologies of identity. In: Archaeological theory today. pp. 187–213. Polity, Cambridge (2001).
115.
Johnson, Matthew: Archaeological theory: an introduction. Blackwell, Oxford (1999).
116.
Conkey, M.W., Gero, J.M.: Programme to practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 26, 411–437 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411.
117.
Tarlow, Sarah, Hamilakis, Yannis, Pluciennik, Mark: Thinking through the body: archaeologies of corporeality. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York (2002).
118.
Knapp, A.B., Meskell, L.: Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 7, 183–204 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959774300001931.
119.
Meskell, L.: The somatization of archaeology: Institutions, discourses, corporeality. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 29, 1–16 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.1996.9965595.
120.
Meskell, Lynn: Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt. Blackwell, Oxford (1999).
121.
Morris, I.: Archaeology and gender ideologies in early Archaic Greece. In: Sex and difference in ancient Greece and Rome. pp. 264–275. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (2003).
122.
Nevett, Lisa C.: House and society in the ancient Greek world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999).
123.
Osborne, R.: Looking on Greek style: does the sculpted girl speak to women too. In: Classical Greece: ancient histories and modern archaeologies. pp. 81–96. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994).
124.
Rautman, Alison E., Gender and Archaeology Conference: Reading the body: representations and remains in the archaeological record. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia (2000).
125.
Sofaer, J.R.: The Body as Material Culture: a Theoretical Osteoarchaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511816666.
126.
Stewart, A.: Reflections. In: Sexuality in ancient art: Near East, Egypt, Greece and Italy. pp. 136–154. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996).
127.
Moore, H.: Bodies on the move: gender, power and material culture. In: A passion for difference: essays in anthropology and gender. pp. 71–85. Polity, Cambridge (1994).
128.
Mauss, M.: Body Techniques. In: Sociology and psychology: essays. pp. 95–123. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London [etc.] (1979).
129.
Jonathan Friedman: The Past in the Future: History and the Politics of Identity. American Anthropologist. 94, 837–859.
130.
Rowlands, M.: The politics of identity in archaeology. In: Social construction of the past: representation as power. pp. 129–143. Routledge, London (1994).
131.
Hamilakis, Y., Yalouri, E.: Antiquities as symbolic capital in modern Greek society. Antiquity. 70, 117–129 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00082934.
132.
Meskell (ed.), L.: Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Routledge (2002). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203029817.
133.
Díaz-Andreu, M.: Nationalism and Archaeology in Europe. Routledge (2014). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315748221.
134.
Michael Dietler: ‘Our Ancestors the Gauls’: Archaeology, Ethnic Nationalism, and the Manipulation of Celtic Identity in Modern Europe. American Anthropologist. 96, 584–605.
135.
Michael Fotiadis: Modernity and the Past-Still-Present: Politics of Time in the Birth of Regional Archaeological Projects in Greece. American Journal of Archaeology. 99, 59–78.
136.
Hamilakis, Y.: Decolonizing Greek archaeology: indigenous archaeologies, modernist archaeology and the post-colonial critique. In: A singular antiquity: archaeology and Hellenic identity in twentieth-century Greece. pp. 273–284. Benaki Museum, Athens (2008).
137.
Hamilakis, Yannis: The nation and its ruins: antiquity, archaeology, and national imagination in Greece. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
138.
Hamilakis, Y.: Museums of oblivion. Antiquity. 85, 625–629 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00068010.
139.
Hamilakis, Y.: Are We Postcolonial Yet? Tales from the Battlefield. Archaeologies. 8, 67–76 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11759-012-9200-5.
140.
Hobsbawm, E., Ranger, T. eds: The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107295636.
141.
Lowenthal, D.: The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511523809.
142.
Lynn Meskell: The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 31, 279–301 (2002).
143.
Odermatt, P.: Built heritage and the politics of (re) presentation. Archaeological Dialogues. 3, 95–119 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1380203800000660.
144.
Pierre Nora: Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations. 7–24.
145.
Yiannis Papadakis: Greek Cypriot Narratives of History and Collective Identity: Nationalism as a Contested Process. American Ethnologist. 25, 149–165.
146.
Paul Sant Cassia: Tradition, Tourism and Memory in Malta. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 5, 247–263.
147.
Yalouri, Eleana: The Acropolis: global fame, local claim. Berg, Oxford (2001).
148.
Banning, E.: Research design and sampling. In: The archaeologist’s laboratory: the analysis of archaeological data. pp. 73–92. London, New York (2000).
149.
Binford, L.R.: A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design. American Antiquity. 29, 425–441 (1964).
150.
Blinkhorn, P.W., Cumberpatch, C.G.: The Interpretation of Artefacts and the Tyranny of the Field Archaeologist. Assemblage: the Sheffield graduate journal of archaeology. 4,.
151.
Bowkett, L., Hill, S., Wardle, D., Wardle, K.A.: Introduction. In: Classical archaeology in the field: approaches. pp. 1–10. Bristol Classical Press, London (2001).
152.
Bowkett, L., Hill, S., Wardle, D., Wardle, K.A.: The development of Classical Archaeology. In: Classical archaeology in the field: approaches. pp. 11–25. Bristol Classical Press, London (2001).
153.
Andrews, G., English Heritage: Management of archaeological projects. English Heritage, London (1991).
154.
Flannery, Kent V.: The early Mesoamerican village. Academic Press, New York (1976).
155.
Hassan, F.A.: Beyond the surface: comments on Hodder’s ‘reflexive excavation methodology’. Antiquity. 71, 1020–1025 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00085938.
156.
Hodder, I.: ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible’: towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity. 71, 691–700 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00085410.
157.
Hodder, I.: Whose rationality? A response to Fekri Hassan. Antiquity. 72, 213–217 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00086439.
158.
Milne, G.: The archaeologist as alchemist. In: From Roman basilica to medieval market: archaeology in action in the city of London. pp. 51–59. HMSO, London (1992).
159.
Payne, S.: Partial recovery and sample bias: The results of some sieving experiments. In: Papers in economic prehistory: studies by members and associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. pp. 49–64. Cambridge University Press, London (1972).
160.
Redman, C.L.: Multistage Fieldwork and Analytical Techniques. American Antiquity. 38, 61–79.
161.
Redman, C.L.: Surface Collection, Sampling, and Research Design: A Retrospective. American Antiquity. 52, 249–265.
162.
W. Raymond Wood and Donald Lee Johnson: A Survey of Disturbance Processes in Archaeological Site Formation. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1, 315–381 (1978).
163.
Lewis R. Binford: Behavioral Archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise’. Journal of Anthropological Research. 37, 195–208 (1981).
164.
Bon, S.E.: A city frozen in time or a site in perpetual motion? Formation processes at Pompeii. In: Sequence and space in Pompeii. pp. 7–12. Oxbow Books, Oxford (1997).
165.
Bradley, R., Fulford, M.: Sherd size in the analysis of occupation debris. Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology. 17, 85–94 (1980).
166.
Green, F.J., Lockyear, K.: Seeds, sherds and samples: site formation processes at the Waitrose site, Romsey. In: Whither environmental archaeology? pp. 91–104. Oxbow (1994).
167.
Halstead, P., Hodder, I., Jones, G.: Behavioural archaeology and refuse patterns: A case study. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 11, 118–131 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1080/00293652.1978.9965308.
168.
Jansen, G.C.M.: Systems for the disposal of waste and excreta in Roman cities. The situation in Pompeii, Herculaneum and Ostia. In: Sordes urbis: la eliminación de residuos en la ciudad romana : actas de la Reunión de Roma (15-16 de noviembre de 1996). pp. 37–50. L’Erma di Bretschneider, Roma (2000).
169.
Liebschuetz, W.: Rubbish disposal in Greek and Roman Cities. In: Sordes urbis: la eliminación de residuos en la ciudad romana : actas de la Reunión de Roma (15-16 de noviembre de 1996). pp. 51–62. L’Erma di Bretschneider, Roma (2000).
170.
Orton, C.R.: Two useful parameters for pottery research. In: Computer applications in archaeology 1985: proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Methods, Institute of Archaeology, London, March 29-30, 1985. pp. 114–120. University of London, Institute of Archaeology, London (1986).
171.
Peña, J.T.: Roman Pottery in the Archaeological Record. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499685.
172.
Schiffer, M.B.: Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity. 37, 156–165 (1972).
173.
Schiffer, Michael B.: Formation processes of the archaeological record. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque, N.M. (1987).
174.
Peter E. Siegel and Peter G. Roe: Shipibo Archaeo-Ethnography: Site Formation Processes and Archaeological Interpretation. World Archaeology. 18, 96–115 (1986).
175.
Alan P. Sullivan, III: The Technology of Ceramic Reuse: Formation Processes and Archaeological Evidence. World Archaeology. 21, 101–114 (1989).
176.
Allison, P.M.: Artefact Assemblages: Not the Pompeii Premise. In: Papers of the fourth Conference of Italian archaeology. pp. 49–56. Accordia Research Centre, London (1991).
177.
Cool, H.E.M.: An overview of the small finds from Catterick. In: Cataractonium: Roman Catterick and its hinterland : excavations and research, 1958-1997. pp. 24–43. Council for British Archaeology, York (2002).
178.
Cool, H.E.M., Baxter, M.J.: Exploring Romano-British finds assemblages. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 21, 365–380 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00168.
179.
Crummy, N.: Six honest serving men: a basic methodology for the study of small finds conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. In: Roman finds: context and theory : proceedings of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. pp. 59–66. Oxbow Books, Oxford (2007).
180.
Hayden, B., Cannon, A.: Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 2, 117–163 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7.
181.
Lockyear, K.: Site Finds in Roman Britain: A Comparison of Techniques. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 19, 397–423 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00118.
182.
Lockyear, Kris: Patterns and process in late Roman Republican coin hoards, 157-2 BC. Archaeopress, Oxford (2007).
183.
Lucas, G.: Splitting objects. In: Critical approaches to fieldwork : contemporary and historical archaeological practice / Gavin Lucas. pp. 64–106.
184.
Millett, M.: Experiments in the analysis of finds deposition at Shiptonthorpe: a retrospect. In: Roman finds: context and theory : proceedings of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. pp. 100–105. Oxbow Books, Oxford (2007).
185.
Orton, C., Hughes, M.: Pottery in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511920066.
186.
Reece, R.: The interpretation of site finds — a review. In: Coin finds and coin use in the Roman world: the thirteenth Oxford Symposium on Coinage and Monetary History, 25.-27.3.1993 : a NATO advanced research workshop. pp. 341–355. Gebr. Mann Verlag, Berlin (1996).
187.
Tyers, P.: Sources for the study of Roman pottery. In: Roman pottery in Britain. pp. 24–35. Batsford, London (1996).
188.
Allison, P.M.: Artefact distribution and spatial function in Pompeian houses. In: The Roman family in Italy: status, sentiment, space. pp. 321–354. Humanities Research Centre, Canberra (1997).
189.
Allison, P.M.: Introduction. In: The archaeology of household activities / edited by Penelope M. Allison. pp. 1–18.
190.
Allison, P.M.: Labels for Ladles: Interpreting the material culture of Roman Householdsby Penelope M. Allison. In: The archaeology of household activities / edited by Penelope M. Allison. pp. 57–77.
191.
Flannery, K.V.: Analysis on the household level/The Early Mesoamerican House. In: The early Mesoamerican village. pp. 13–24. Academic Press, New York (1976).
192.
Gardner, A.: Artefacts, contexts, and the archaeology of social practicess of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. In: Roman finds: context and theory : proceedings of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. pp. 128–139. Oxbow Books, Oxford (2007).
193.
Grahame, M.: Public and private in the Roman house: the spatial order of the Casa del Fauno. In: Roman finds: context and theory : proceedings of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. pp. 137–164. Oxbow Books, Oxford (2007).
194.
Grahame, Mark: Reading space: social interaction and identity in the houses of Roman Pompeii : a syntactical approach to the analysis and interpretation of built space. Archaeopress, Oxford (2000).
195.
LaMotta, V.M., Schiffer, M.B.: The formation processes of house floor assemblages. In: The archaeology of household activities / edited by Penelope M. Allison. pp. 19–29.
196.
Laurence, Ray: Roman Pompeii: space and society. Routledge, London (1994).
197.
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew: Houses and society in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994).
198.
Barker, Graeme, Hodges, Richard, Clark, Gillian: A Mediterranean valley: landscape archaeology and Annales History in the Biferno Valley. Leicester University Press, London (1995).
199.
Barker, Graeme, Mattingly, D. J., Unesco Libyan Valleys Archaeological Survey: Farming the desert: the UNESCO Libyan Valleys Archaeological Survey. UNESCO, Paris (1996).
200.
Barker, Graeme, Lloyd, John, British School at Rome, Ecole française de Rome, Instituto Español de Historia y Arqueología, Struttura agricola romana: il contributo della ricognizione archeologica: Conference: Roman landscapes: archaeological survey in the Mediterranean region. British School at Rome, London (1991).
201.
Belcher, M., Harrison, A., Stoddart, S.: Analyzing Rome’s hinterland. In: Geographical information systems and landscape archaeology. pp. 95–101. Oxbow, Oxford (1999).
202.
Flannery, Kent V.: The early Mesoamerican village. Academic Press, New York (1976).
203.
Flannery, K.V.: Sampling on the Regional Level. In: The early Mesoamerican village. pp. 131–160. Academic Press, New York (1976).
204.
Hayes, J.W.: The current state of Roman ceramic studies in Mediterranean survey, or handling pottery from surveys. In: Extracting meaning from ploughsoil assemblages. pp. 105–109. Oxbow, Oxford (2000).
205.
Lock, G., Bell, T., Lloyd, J.: Towards a methodology for modeling surface survey data: the Sangro Valley Project. In: Geographical information systems and landscape archaeology. pp. 55–63. Oxbow, Oxford (1999).
206.
Mattingly, D.: Methods of collection, recording and quantification. In: Extracting meaning from ploughsoil assemblages. pp. 5–15. Oxbow, Oxford (2000).
207.
Mattingly, D., Witcher, R.: Mapping the Roman world: the contribution of field survey data. In: Side-by-side survey: comparative regional studies in the Mediterranean World. pp. 173–188. Oxbow, Oxford (2004).
208.
Millett, M.: Dating, quantifying and utilizing pottery assemblages from surface survey. In: Extracting meaning from ploughsoil assemblages. pp. 53–59. Oxbow, Oxford (2000).
209.
Orton, C.R.: Covering the ground. In: Sampling in archaeology. pp. 67–111. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).
210.
Terrenato, N.: The visibility of sites and the interpretation of field survey results: towards an analysis of incomplete distributions. In: Extracting meaning from ploughsoil assemblages. pp. 60–71. Oxbow, Oxford (2000).
211.
Terrenato, N.: "Sample size matters! The paradox of global trends and local surveys. In: Side-by-side survey: comparative regional studies in the Mediterranean World. pp. 36–48. Oxbow, Oxford (2004).
