1.
Johnson M. Common sense is not enough. In: Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2010:1-12. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=017e9e8d-0208-e811-80cd-005056af4099
2.
Morris I. Archaeologies of Greece. In: Archaeology as Cultural History: Words and Things in Iron Age Greece. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 2000:37-76.
3.
Whitley J. Introduction: Classical Archaeology and its objects. In: The Archaeology of Ancient Greece. Vol Cambridge world archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2001:3-16. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=1bc8b1eb-5b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
4.
Snodgrass A. The health of a discipline. In: An Archaeology of Greece: The Present State and Future Scope of a Discipline. Vol Sather classical lectures. University of California Press; 1987:1-36.
5.
Biers WR. Art, Artefacts, and Chronology in Classical Archaeology. Vol Approaching the ancient world. Routledge; 1992.
6.
Hodder I. Introduction: Contemporary Theoretical Debate in Archaeology. In: Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Polity; 2012:1-14. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EK&ppid=Page-__-1
7.
Hodder I, Hudson S. The problem. In: Reading the Past : Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology / Ian Hodder and Scott Hutson. ; :1-19. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780511562136
8.
Hodder I. Crises in Global Archaeology. In: The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Blackwell; 1999:1-19. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=aa824ea4-5e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
9.
Morris I. Periodization and the heroes: Inventing a dark age. In: Inventing Ancient Culture: Historicism, Periodization and the Ancient World. Routledge; 1997:96-131. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0e127228-5236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
10.
Hawkes C. Archaeological theory and method: some suggestions from the Old World. American Anthropologist. 1954;56(2):155-168. doi:10.1525/aa.1954.56.2.02a00660
11.
Osborne R, Alcock S. Introduction. In: Classical Archaeology. Vol Blackwell studies in global archaeology. Blackwell; 2007:1-8. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a34f9f92-5f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
12.
Terrenato N. The innocents and the sceptics: ANTIQUITY and classical archaeology. Antiquity. 2002;76(294):1104-1111. https://search.proquest.com/docview/217558742?accountid=14511
13.
Shanks M. Cities and sanctuaries, art and archaeology: roots in the past. In: Classical Archaeology of Greece: Experiences of the Discipline. Vol The experience of archaeology. Routledge; 1995:21-51.
14.
Dyson SL. The role of ideology and institutions in shaping classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. In: Tracing Archaeology’s Past: The Historiography of Archaeology. Vol Publications in archaeology. Southern Illinois University Press; 1989:127-135. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=bfc0d84c-6e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
15.
Kurtz DC. Beazley and the connoisseurship of Greek vases. In: Greek Vases in the J. Paul Getty Museum: Vol.2. Vol Occasional papers on antiquities. J. Paul Getty Museum; 1985:237-250.
16.
Whitley J. Beazley as theorist. Antiquity. 1997;71(271):40-47. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00084520
17.
Ceserani G. Wilamowitz and stratigraphy in 1873. A case study in the history of archaeology’s ‘Great Divide’. In: Archives, Ancestors, Practices: Archaeology in the Light of Its History. Berghahn Books; 2008:75-87. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d3623eb4-8536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
18.
Childe VG. What Happened in History. M. Parrish; 1960.
19.
Clarke D. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity. 1973;47(185):6-18. doi:10.1017/S0003598X0003461X
20.
Dyson SL. In Pursuit of Ancient Pasts: A History of Classical Archaeology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Yale University Press; 2006. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npzcm
21.
Momigliano A. Ancient History and the Antiquarian. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. 1950;13(3/4):285-315. doi:10.2307/750215
22.
Sparkes BA. The Red and the Black: Studies in Greek Pottery. Routledge; 1996.
23.
Schnapp A. The Discovery of the Past: The Origins of Archaeology. British Museum Press; 1996.
24.
Michael Vickers. Value and Simplicity: Eighteenth-Century Taste and the Study of Greek Vases. Past & Present. (116):98-137. http://www.jstor.org/stable/650882
25.
Dyson SL. A Classical Archaeologist’s Response to the ‘New Archaeology’. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research. 1981;242(242):7-13. doi:10.2307/1356543
26.
Johnson M. The ‘New Archaeology’. In: Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2010:12-34. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c030bb34-7a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
27.
Clarke D. Archaeology: the loss of innocence. Antiquity. 1973;47(185):6-18. doi:10.1017/S0003598X0003461X
28.
Shanks M. Rudiments of a social archaeology (Chapter 5). In: Classical Archaeology of Greece: Experiences of the Discipline. Vol The experience of archaeology. Routledge; 1995:118-153.
29.
Snodgrass AM. The New Archaeology and the Classical Archaeologist. American Journal of Archaeology. 1985;89(1):31-37. doi:10.2307/504768
30.
Binford L. Archaeological perspectives. In: New Perspectives in Archaeology. Aldine; 1968:78-104. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6c608edf-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
31.
Ian Hodder. Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view. In: Hodder I, ed. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1982:1-16. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511558252
32.
Johnson M. Culture as system. In: Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. Blackwell; 1999:64-84.
33.
Morgan C, Whitelaw T. Pots and Politics: Ceramic Evidence for the Rise of the Argive State. American Journal of Archaeology. 1991;95(1):79-108. doi:10.2307/505158
34.
Morris I. Burial and Ancient Society: The Rise of the Greek City-State. Vol New studies in archaelogy. Cambridge University Press; 1987. http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01457
35.
Renfrew C. The multiplier effect in action. In: Approaches to Social Archaeology. Harvard University Press; 1984:283-308. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=fd5ffdf7-5f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
36.
Snodgrass, Anthony M. Archaic Greece: The Age of Experiment. University of California Press; 1980.
37.
Schiffer MB. Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity. 1972;37(2):156-165. doi:10.2307/278203
38.
Trigger BG. Current trends in American archaeology. In: Time and Traditions: Essays in Archaeological Interpretation. Edinburgh University Press; 1978:2-18. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=17761142-7136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
39.
Whitley, James. Style and Society in Dark Age Greece: The Changing Face of a Pre-Literate Society, 1100-700 B.C. Vol New studies in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1991.
40.
James Whitley. Social Diversity in Dark Age Greece. The Annual of the British School at Athens. 1991;86:341-365. http://www.jstor.org/stable/30102882
41.
Cherry J. Power in space: archaeological and geographical studies of the state. In: Landscape and Culture: Geographical and Archaeological Perspectives. Basil Blackwell; 1987:146-172. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=90501fdd-5d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
42.
Thomas J. Archaeologies of place and landscape. In: Archaeological Theory Today. Polity; 2001:165-186. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EK&ppid=Page-__-85
43.
Horden, Peregrine, Purcell, Nicholas. The Corrupting Sea: A Study of Mediterranean History. Blackwell; 2000.
44.
Alcock SE, Cherry JF, Davies JL. Intensive survey, agricultural practices and the classical landscape of Greece. In: Classical Greece: Ancient Histories and Modern Archaeologies. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1994:137-170.
45.
Alcock, Susan E., Cherry, John F. Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxbow; 2004.
46.
Bintliff JL. Settlement and territory. In: Companion Encyclopedia of Archaeology. Vol 1. Routledge; 1999:505-545. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=2585e681-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
47.
Cunliffe B. Hill-Forts and oppida in Britain. In: Problems in Economic and Social Archaeology. Duckworth; 1976:343-358. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=33962b5c-6436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
48.
Fitzjohn M. A cognitive approach to an upland landscape. In: Uplands of Ancient Sicily and Calabria: The Archaeology of Landscape Revisited. Vol Accordia specialist studies on Italy. Accordia Research Institute; 2007:143-155. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=572135d9-8e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
49.
Higgs ES, Vita-Finzi C. Prehistoric Economies: a territorial approach. In: Papers in Economic Prehistory: Studies by Members and Associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. Cambridge University Press; 1972:27-36. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ce479ae8-0608-e811-80cd-005056af4099
50.
Knapp AB, Ashmore W. Archaeological Landscapes: Constructed, Conceptualized, Ideational. In: Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell Publishers; 1999:1-30. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ad4ce8e9-5e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
51.
Rackham O. Ancient landscapes. In: The Greek City: From Homer to Alexander. Clarendon Press; 1991:85-111. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ef0e44c9-4c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
52.
Renfrew AC. Space, time and polity. In: The Evolution of Social Systems: Proceedings of a Meeting of the Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects Held at the Institute of Archaeology, London University. Duckworth; 1977:89-112. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ab131751-6436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
53.
Tilley C. Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives. In: A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths, and Monuments. Vol Explorations in anthropology. Berg; 1994:7-34. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c375a3b7-8b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
54.
Dyson SL. From New to New Age Archaeology: Archaeological Theory and Classical Archaeology-A 1990s Perspective. American Journal of Archaeology. 1993;97(2):195-206. doi:10.2307/505656
55.
Johnson, Matthew. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Wiley-Blackwell; 2010.
56.
Morris I. Archaeology as cultural history. In: Archaeology as Cultural History: Words and Things in Iron Age Greece. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 2000:3-36.
57.
Morris I. The past, the east and the hero of Lefkandi. In: Archaeology as Cultural History: Words and Things in Iron Age Greece. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 2000:195-256.
58.
Shanks M, Hodder I. Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies. In: Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past. Routledge; 1994:3-28. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317799467
59.
Hodder I. Contextual archaeology. In: Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. ; 2003:156-205. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780511562136
60.
Shanks M. Style and the design of a perfume jar from an Archaic Greek city state. In: Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: [A Reader]. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 1996:364-393. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=32a31a7d-5e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
61.
M. Shanks, C. Tilley. Ideology, Symbolic Power and Ritual Communication: A Reinterpretation of Neolithic Mortuary Practices. In: Hodder I, ed. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1982:129-161. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511558252
62.
Shanks, Michael, Tilley, Christopher Y. Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. Vol New studies in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1987.
63.
Snodgrass A. The first figure scenes in Greek art. In: An Archaeology of Greece: The Present State and Future Scope of a Discipline. Vol Sather classical lectures. University of California Press; 1987:132-169.
64.
Interpretative Archaeology. Bloomsbury Academic; 1993. doi:10.5040/9781474214995
65.
Thomas J. Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s. In: Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. Routledge; 1994:343-362. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=db055f42-5236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
66.
Patty Jo Watson and Michael Fotiadis. The Razor’s Edge: Symbolic-Structuralist Archeology and the Expansion of Archeological Inference. American Anthropologist. 92(3):613-629. http://www.jstor.org/stable/680338
67.
d’Agostino B. The Italian perspective on theoretical archaeology. In: Archaeological Theory in Europe: The Last Three Decades. Vol Material cultures. Routledge; 1991:52-64.
68.
Kotsakis K. The powerful past: theoretical trends in Greek archaeology. In: Archaeological Theory in Europe: The Last Three Decades. Vol Material cultures. Routledge; 1991:65-90. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a58826a0-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
69.
Bérard, Claude. A City of Images: Iconography and Society in Ancient Greece. Princeton University Press; 1989.
70.
Schnapp A. Eros the Hunter. In: A City of Images: Iconography and Society in Ancient Greece. Princeton University Press; 1989:71-87. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=b038aa25-6136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
71.
Bintliff, J. L. The Annales School and Archaeology. Leicester University Press; 1991. https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/7980
72.
Bietti Sestieri, Anna Maria. The Iron Age Community of Osteria Dell’Osa: A Study of Socio-Political Development in Central Tyrrhenian Italy. Vol New studies in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1992.
73.
Cleuziou S, Coudart A, Demoule JP, Schnapp A. The use of Theory in French Archaeology. In: Archaeological Theory in Europe: The Last Three Decades. Vol Material cultures. Routledge; 1991:91-128.
74.
Cuozzo M. Patterns of Organisation and Funerary Customs in the Cemetery of Pontecagnano (Salerno) During the Orientalising Period. Journal of European Archaeology. 1994;2(2):263-298. doi:10.1179/096576694800719157
75.
Cuozzo MA. Ancient Campania. Cultural interaction, political borders and geographical boundaries. In: Ancient Italy: Regions without Boundaries. University of Exeter Press; 2007:224-267. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=575d8078-0b08-e811-80cd-005056af4099
76.
d’Agostino B. Military Organisation and social structure in Archaic Etruria. In: The Greek City: From Homer to Alexander. Clarendon Press; 1991:59-82.
77.
Izzet V. Etruria and the Etruscans. Recent approaches. In: Ancient Italy: Regions without Boundaries. University of Exeter Press; 2007:114-130.
78.
Lissarrague F. Epiktetos egraphsen: the Writing on the Cup. In: Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture. Vol Cambridge studies in new art history and criticism. Cambridge University Press; 1994:12-27. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=01b654c8-5a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
79.
Marchand, Suzanne L. Down from Olympus: Archaeology and Philhellenism in Germany, 1750-1970. Princeton University Press; 1996.
80.
Terrenato N. ‘Start the revolution without me’: recent debates in Italian Classical Archaeology. In: Papers in Italian Archaeology VI: Communities and Settlements from the Neolithic to the Early Medieval Period : Proceedings of the 6th Conference of Italian Archaeology Held at the Univrsity of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, the Netherlands, April 15-17, 2003. Vol BAR international series. Archaeopress; 2005:39-43.
81.
Dobres MA, Robb JE. Agency in archaeology: paradigm or platitude? In: Agency in Archaeology. Routledge; 2000:3-17. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=37d0cb62-5336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
82.
Gardner A. Agency. In: Handbook of Archaeological Theories. ; 2008:95-108. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780759113602
83.
Morris I. The anthropology of a dead world. In: Death-Ritual and Social Structure in Classical Antiquity. Vol Key themes in ancient history. Cambridge University Press; 1992:1-30. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c4ad4e7d-5a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
84.
Osborne R. W(h)ither Orientalization? In: Debating Orientalization: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Processes of Change in the Ancient Mediterranean. Vol Monographs in Mediterranean archaeology. Equinox; 2006:153-158. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ff782124-8636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
85.
Sewell WH. The Concept(s) of Culture. In: Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Vol Chicago studies in practices of meaning. University of Chicago Press; 2005:152-174.
86.
Shanks M, Tilley C. The individual and the social. In: Social Theory and Archaeology. Polity in association with Blackwell; 1987:61-78. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=07ba3ee9-6636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
87.
Gardner, Andrew. An Archaeology of Identity: Soldiers and Society in Late Roman Britain. Vol Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Left Coast Press; 2007.
88.
Gell A. The problem defined. In: Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Clarendon Press; 1998:1-11. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f6621786-4e67-e911-80cd-005056af4099
89.
Tanner J. Culture, social structure and artistic agency in Classical Greece. In: The Invention of Art History in Ancient Greece: Religion, Society and Artistic Rationalisation. Vol Cambridge classical studies. Cambridge University Press; 2006:141-204. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f7d2a9ba-5c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
90.
Barrett J. Agency, the duality of structure and the problem of the archaeological record. In: Archaeological Theory Today. Polity; 2001:141-164. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EK&ppid=Page-__-76
91.
Bourdieu P. The Berber house or the world reversed. In: Rules and Meanings: The Anthropology of Everyday Knowledge : Selected Readings. Vol Penguin modern sociology readings. Penguin Education; 1973:98-110. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f96314a8-155a-e911-80cd-005056af4099
92.
Bourdieu, Pierre, Nice, Richard. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Vol Cambridge studies in social anthropology. Cambridge University Press; 1977.
93.
Dietler M, Herbich I. Habitus, techniques, style: an integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture and boundaries. In: The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. Vol Smithsonian series in archaeological inquiry. Smithsonian Institution Press; 1998:232-263. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=01d474eb-7d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
94.
Giddens, Anthony. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Polity Press; 1986. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1221197
95.
van Dommelen P. Punic persistence: colonialism and cultural identity in Roman Sardinia. In: Cultural Identity in the Roman Empire. Routledge; 1998:25-48. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=407c43b5-5236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
96.
Meskell L. Archaeologies of identity. In: Archaeological Theory Today. Polity; 2001:187-213. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a382cfcd-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
97.
Hall JM. Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 1998;8(02):265-283. doi:10.1017/S0959774300001864
98.
Vives-Ferrándiz Sánchez J. Colonial encounters and the negotiation of identities in south-east Iberia. In: Mediterranean Crossroads. Pierides Foundation; 2007:537-562.
99.
Peter van Dommelen. Colonial Constructs: Colonialism and Archaeology in the Mediterranean. World Archaeology. 28(3):305-323. http://www.jstor.org/stable/125021
100.
Antonaccio C. Ethnicity and Colonization. In: Ancient Perceptions of Greek Ethnicity. Vol Center for Hellenic Studies colloquia. Center for Hellenic Studies, Trustees for Harvard University; 2001:113-157.
101.
Diaz-Andreu M, Lucy S. Introduction. In: The Archaeology of Identity: Approaches to Gender, Age, Status, Ethnicity and Religion. Routledge; 2005:1-13. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=b25f4f45-5336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
102.
Morgan C. Ethnicity and early Greek states: historical and material perspectives. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society. 1992;37:131-163. doi:10.1017/S0068673500001565
103.
Given M. Inventing the Eteocypriots: Imperialist Archaeology and the Manipulation of Ethnic Identity. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology. 1998;11(1):3-29. doi:10.1558/jmea.v11i1.3
104.
Fotiadis M. Cultural identity and regional archaeological projects. Archaeological Dialogues. 1997;4(01):102-113. doi:10.1017/S1380203800000933
105.
Hingley R. Cultural Diversity and Unity: empire and Rome. In: Material Culture and Social Identities in the Ancient World. Cambridge University Press; 2010:54-75. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4073012d-5c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
106.
Jones S. Discourses of identity in the interpretation of the past. In: Cultural Identity and Archaeology: The Construction of European Communities. Vol Theoretical Archaeology Group (TAG). Routledge; 1996:62-80. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8c7bba35-5236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
107.
Malkin I. Postcolonial Concepts and Ancient Greek Colonization. MLQ: Modern Language Quarterly. 2004;65(3):341-364. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/modern_language_quarterly/v065/65.3malkin.html
108.
Hall, Jonathan M. Hellenicity: Between Ethnicity and Culture. University of Chicago Press; 2002.
109.
van Dommelen P. Cultural imaginings. Punic tradition and local identity in Roman Republican Sardinia. In: Italy and the West: Comparative Issues in Romanization. Oxbow; 2001:68-84. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=cdd86dae-8136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
110.
Woolf, Greg, Gosden C. Beyond Romans and natives. World Archaeology. 1997;28(3):339-350. https://www.jstor.org/stable/125023
111.
Woolf G. Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul. Cambridge University Press; 1998. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511518614
112.
Yates T. Frameworks for an archaeology of the body. In: Interpretative Archaeology. Vol Explorations in anthropology. Berg; 1992:31-72. https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/interpretative-archaeology/
113.
Izzet V. Holding a mirror to Etruscan gender. In: Gender and Italian Archaeology: Challenging the Stereotypes. Vol Accordia specialist studies on Italy. Accordia Research Institute; 1998:209-227. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ec69728f-8e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
114.
Meskell L. Archaeologies of identity. In: Archaeological Theory Today. Polity; 2001:187-213. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e0a1019e-0a08-e811-80cd-005056af4099
115.
Johnson, Matthew. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. Blackwell; 1999.
116.
Conkey MW, Gero JM. Programme to practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 1997;26(1):411-437. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411
117.
Tarlow, Sarah, Hamilakis, Yannis, Pluciennik, Mark. Thinking through the Body: Archaeologies of Corporeality. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 2002.
118.
Knapp AB, Meskell L. Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus. Cambridge Archaeological Journal. 1997;7(02):183-204. doi:10.1017/S0959774300001931
119.
Meskell L. The somatization of archaeology: Institutions, discourses, corporeality. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 1996;29(1):1-16. doi:10.1080/00293652.1996.9965595
120.
Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et Cetera in Ancient Egypt. Vol Social archaeology. Blackwell; 1999.
121.
Morris I. Archaeology and gender ideologies in early Archaic Greece. In: Sex and Difference in Ancient Greece and Rome. Vol Edinburgh readings on the ancient world. Edinburgh University Press; 2003:264-275. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=67759abe-6836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
122.
Nevett, Lisa C. House and Society in the Ancient Greek World. Vol New studies in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1999.
123.
Osborne R. Looking on Greek style: does the sculpted girl speak to women too. In: Classical Greece: Ancient Histories and Modern Archaeologies. Vol New directions in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 1994:81-96.
124.
Rautman, Alison E., Gender and Archaeology Conference. Reading the Body: Representations and Remains in the Archaeological Record. Vol Regendering the past. University of Pennsylvania Press; 2000.
125.
Sofaer JR. The Body as Material Culture: A Theoretical Osteoarchaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2006. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511816666
126.
Stewart A. Reflections. In: Sexuality in Ancient Art: Near East, Egypt, Greece and Italy. Vol Cambridge studies in new art history and criticsm. Cambridge University Press; 1996:136-154. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d0bd0a7c-5b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
127.
Moore H. Bodies on the move: gender, power and material culture. In: A Passion for Difference: Essays in Anthropology and Gender. Polity; 1994:71-85. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ed370090-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
128.
Mauss M. Body Techniques. In: Sociology and Psychology: Essays. Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1979:95-123. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=7d8e026e-6236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
129.
Jonathan Friedman. The Past in the Future: History and the Politics of Identity. American Anthropologist. 94(4):837-859. http://www.jstor.org/stable/680224
130.
Rowlands M. The politics of identity in archaeology. In: Social Construction of the Past: Representation as Power. Vol One world archaeology. Routledge; 1994:129-143. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=5aacb0fb-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
131.
Hamilakis Y, Yalouri E. Antiquities as symbolic capital in modern Greek society. Antiquity. 1996;70(267):117-129. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00082934
132.
Meskell (ed.) L. Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Routledge; 2002. doi:10.4324/9780203029817
133.
Díaz-Andreu M. Nationalism and Archaeology in Europe. Routledge; 2014. doi:10.4324/9781315748221
134.
Michael Dietler. ‘Our Ancestors the Gauls’: Archaeology, Ethnic Nationalism, and the Manipulation of Celtic Identity in Modern Europe. American Anthropologist. 96(3):584-605. http://www.jstor.org/stable/682302
135.
Michael Fotiadis. Modernity and the Past-Still-Present: Politics of Time in the Birth of Regional Archaeological Projects in Greece. American Journal of Archaeology. 99(1):59-78. http://www.jstor.org/stable/506879
136.
Hamilakis Y. Decolonizing Greek archaeology: indigenous archaeologies, modernist archaeology and the post-colonial critique. In: A Singular Antiquity: Archaeology and Hellenic Identity in Twentieth-Century Greece. Vol Mouseio Benaki. Benaki Museum; 2008:273-284. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e15c9e59-4d67-e911-80cd-005056af4099
137.
Hamilakis, Yannis. The Nation and Its Ruins: Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece. Vol Classical presences. Oxford University Press; 2007.
138.
Hamilakis Y. Museums of oblivion. Antiquity. 2011;85(328):625-629. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00068010
139.
Hamilakis Y. Are We Postcolonial Yet? Tales from the Battlefield. Archaeologies. 2012;8(1):67-76. doi:10.1007/s11759-012-9200-5
140.
Hobsbawm E, Ranger T, eds. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge University Press; 2012. doi:10.1017/CBO9781107295636
141.
Lowenthal D. The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. Cambridge University Press; 1998. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511523809
142.
Lynn Meskell. The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology. 2002;31:279-301. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132881
143.
Odermatt P. Built heritage and the politics of (re) presentation. Archaeological Dialogues. 1996;3(02):95-119. doi:10.1017/S1380203800000660
144.
Pierre Nora. Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Representations. (26):7-24. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2928520
145.
Yiannis Papadakis. Greek Cypriot Narratives of History and Collective Identity: Nationalism as a Contested Process. American Ethnologist. 25(2):149-165. http://www.jstor.org/stable/646690
146.
Paul Sant Cassia. Tradition, Tourism and Memory in Malta. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. 5(2):247-263. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2660696
147.
Yalouri, Eleana. The Acropolis: Global Fame, Local Claim. Vol Materializing culture. Berg; 2001.
148.
Banning E. Research design and sampling. In: The Archaeologist’s Laboratory: The Analysis of Archaeological Data. Vol Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology. London; 2000:73-92. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=cfa3440e-4e67-e911-80cd-005056af4099
149.
Binford LR. A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design. American Antiquity. 1964;29(4):425-441. http://www.jstor.org/stable/277978
150.
Blinkhorn PW, Cumberpatch CG. The Interpretation of Artefacts and the Tyranny of the Field Archaeologist. Assemblage: the Sheffield graduate journal of archaeology. 4. https://assemblagejournal.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/blinkhorn-and-cumberpatch-1998-the-interpretation-of-artefacts-and-the-tyranny-of-the-field-archaeologist.pdf
151.
Bowkett L, Hill S, Wardle D, Wardle KA. Introduction. In: Classical Archaeology in the Field: Approaches. Vol Classical world series. Bristol Classical Press; 2001:1-10.
152.
Bowkett L, Hill S, Wardle D, Wardle KA. The development of Classical Archaeology. In: Classical Archaeology in the Field: Approaches. Vol Classical world series. Bristol Classical Press; 2001:11-25. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=87753895-8936-e711-80c9-005056af4099
153.
Andrews G, English Heritage. Management of Archaeological Projects. English Heritage; 1991. http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue5/westhes/map2index.htm
154.
Flannery, Kent V. The Early Mesoamerican Village. Vol Studies in archeology. Academic Press; 1976.
155.
Hassan FA. Beyond the surface: comments on Hodder’s ‘reflexive excavation methodology’. Antiquity. 1997;71(274):1020-1025. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00085938
156.
Hodder I. ‘Always momentary, fluid and flexible’: towards a reflexive excavation methodology. Antiquity. 1997;71(273):691-700. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00085410
157.
Hodder I. Whose rationality? A response to Fekri Hassan. Antiquity. 1998;72(275):213-217. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00086439
158.
Milne G. The archaeologist as alchemist. In: From Roman Basilica to Medieval Market: Archaeology in Action in the City of London. HMSO; 1992:51-59. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c3113bbe-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
159.
Payne S. Partial recovery and sample bias: The results of some sieving experiments. In: Papers in Economic Prehistory: Studies by Members and Associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. Cambridge University Press; 1972:49-64. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=41494f18-5936-e711-80c9-005056af4099
160.
Redman CL. Multistage Fieldwork and Analytical Techniques. American Antiquity. 38(1):61-79. http://www.jstor.org/stable/279311
161.
Redman CL. Surface Collection, Sampling, and Research Design: A Retrospective. American Antiquity. 52(2):249-265. http://www.jstor.org/stable/281779
162.
W. Raymond Wood and Donald Lee Johnson. A Survey of Disturbance Processes in Archaeological Site Formation. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory. 1978;1:315-381. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170136
163.
Lewis R. Binford. Behavioral Archaeology and the ‘Pompeii Premise’. Journal of Anthropological Research. 1981;37(3):195-208. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629723
164.
Bon SE. A city frozen in time or a site in perpetual motion? Formation processes at Pompeii. In: Sequence and Space in Pompeii. Vol Oxbow monograph. Oxbow Books; 1997:7-12. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=123f78cd-8f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
165.
Bradley R, Fulford M. Sherd size in the analysis of occupation debris. Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology. 1980;17:85-94. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=de9090bc-4a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
166.
Green FJ, Lockyear K. Seeds, sherds and samples: site formation processes at the Waitrose site, Romsey. In: Whither Environmental Archaeology?. Vol Oxbow monograph. Oxbow; 1994:91-104. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=1f953589-7736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
167.
Halstead P, Hodder I, Jones G. Behavioural archaeology and refuse patterns: A case study. Norwegian Archaeological Review. 1978;11(2):118-131. doi:10.1080/00293652.1978.9965308
168.
Jansen GCM. Systems for the disposal of waste and excreta in Roman cities. The situation in Pompeii, Herculaneum and Ostia. In: Sordes Urbis: La Eliminación de Residuos En La Ciudad Romana : Actas de La Reunión de Roma (15-16 de Noviembre de 1996). Vol Bibliotheca Italica : monografías de la Escuela Española de Historia y Arqueología en Roma. L’Erma di Bretschneider; 2000:37-50.
169.
Liebschuetz W. Rubbish disposal in Greek and Roman Cities. In: Sordes Urbis: La Eliminación de Residuos En La Ciudad Romana : Actas de La Reunión de Roma (15-16 de Noviembre de 1996). Vol Bibliotheca Italica : monografías de la Escuela Española de Historia y Arqueología en Roma. L’Erma di Bretschneider; 2000:51-62.
170.
Orton CR. Two useful parameters for pottery research. In: Computer Applications in Archaeology 1985: Proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Methods, Institute of Archaeology, London, March 29-30, 1985. University of London, Institute of Archaeology; 1986:114-120. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2f76d612-1c46-e711-80cb-005056af4099
171.
Peña JT. Roman Pottery in the Archaeological Record. Cambridge University Press; 2007. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511499685
172.
Schiffer MB. Archaeological Context and Systemic Context. American Antiquity. 1972;37(2):156-165. http://www.jstor.org/stable/278203
173.
Schiffer, Michael B. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. University of New Mexico Press; 1987. http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=10467&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_COVER
174.
Peter E. Siegel and Peter G. Roe. Shipibo Archaeo-Ethnography: Site Formation Processes and Archaeological Interpretation. World Archaeology. 1986;18(1):96-115. http://www.jstor.org/stable/124664
175.
Alan P. Sullivan, III. The Technology of Ceramic Reuse: Formation Processes and Archaeological Evidence. World Archaeology. 1989;21(1):101-114. http://www.jstor.org/stable/124487
176.
Allison PM. Artefact Assemblages: Not the Pompeii Premise. In: Papers of the Fourth Conference of Italian Archaeology. Accordia Research Centre; 1991:49-56. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0b7c6260-8e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
177.
Cool HEM. An overview of the small finds from Catterick. In: Cataractonium: Roman Catterick and Its Hinterland : Excavations and Research, 1958-1997. Vol Research report / Council for British Archaeology. Council for British Archaeology; 2002:24-43. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a3e10cef-9036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
178.
Cool HEM, Baxter MJ. Exploring Romano-British finds assemblages. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 2002;21(4):365-380. doi:10.1111/1468-0092.00168
179.
Crummy N. Six honest serving men: a basic methodology for the study of small finds conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. In: Roman Finds: Context and Theory : Proceedings of a Conference Held at the Univeristy of Durham. Oxbow Books; 2007:59-66. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kw29ff
180.
Hayden B, Cannon A. Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. 1983;2(2):117-163. doi:10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7
181.
Lockyear K. Site Finds in Roman Britain: A Comparison of Techniques. Oxford Journal of Archaeology. 2000;19(4):397-423. doi:10.1111/1468-0092.00118
182.
Lockyear, Kris. Patterns and Process in Late Roman Republican Coin Hoards, 157-2 BC. Vol BAR international series. Archaeopress; 2007.
183.
Lucas G. Splitting objects. In: Critical Approaches to Fieldwork : Contemporary and Historical Archaeological Practice / Gavin Lucas. ; :64-106. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203132258
184.
Millett M. Experiments in the analysis of finds deposition at Shiptonthorpe: a retrospect. In: Roman Finds: Context and Theory : Proceedings of a Conference Held at the Univeristy of Durham. Oxbow Books; 2007:100-105. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kw29ff
185.
Orton C, Hughes M. Pottery in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2013. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511920066
186.
Reece R. The interpretation of site finds — a review. In: Coin Finds and Coin Use in the Roman World: The Thirteenth Oxford Symposium on Coinage and Monetary History, 25.-27.3.1993 : A NATO Advanced Research Workshop. Vol Studien zu Fundmünzen der Antike. Gebr. Mann Verlag; 1996:341-355.
187.
Tyers P. Sources for the study of Roman pottery. In: Roman Pottery in Britain. Batsford; 1996:24-35. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f9cfe4ff-6236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
188.
Allison PM. Artefact distribution and spatial function in Pompeian houses. In: The Roman Family in Italy: Status, Sentiment, Space. Vol OUP/HRC. Humanities Research Centre; 1997:321-354. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=79e1dcd6-4c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
189.
Allison PM. Introduction. In: The Archaeology of Household Activities / Edited by Penelope M. Allison. ; :1-18. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203014929
190.
Allison PM. Labels for Ladles: Interpreting the material culture of Roman Householdsby Penelope M. Allison. In: The Archaeology of Household Activities / Edited by Penelope M. Allison. ; :57-77. http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203014929
191.
Flannery KV. Analysis on the household level/The Early Mesoamerican House. In: The Early Mesoamerican Village. Vol Studies in archeology. Academic Press; 1976:13-24.
192.
Gardner A. Artefacts, contexts, and the archaeology of social practicess of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham. In: Roman Finds: Context and Theory : Proceedings of a Conference Held at the Univeristy of Durham. Oxbow Books; 2007:128-139. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kw29ff
193.
Grahame M. Public and private in the Roman house: the spatial order of the Casa del Fauno. In: Roman Finds: Context and Theory : Proceedings of a Conference Held at the Univeristy of Durham. Oxbow Books; 2007:137-164. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kw29ff
194.
Grahame, Mark. Reading Space: Social Interaction and Identity in the Houses of Roman Pompeii : A Syntactical Approach to the Analysis and Interpretation of Built Space. Vol BAR international series. Archaeopress; 2000.
195.
LaMotta VM, Schiffer MB. The formation processes of house floor assemblages. In: The Archaeology of Household Activities / Edited by Penelope M. Allison. ; :19-29. https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780203014929/startPage/16/1
196.
Laurence, Ray. Roman Pompeii: Space and Society. Routledge; 1994.
197.
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. Houses and Society in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Princeton University Press; 1994.
198.
Barker, Graeme, Hodges, Richard, Clark, Gillian. A Mediterranean Valley: Landscape Archaeology and Annales History in the Biferno Valley. Leicester University Press; 1995.
199.
Barker, Graeme, Mattingly, D. J., Unesco Libyan Valleys Archaeological Survey. Farming the Desert: The UNESCO Libyan Valleys Archaeological Survey. UNESCO; 1996.
200.
Barker, Graeme, Lloyd, John, British School at Rome, Ecole française de Rome, Instituto Español de Historia y Arqueología, Struttura agricola romana: il contributo della ricognizione archeologica: Conference. Roman Landscapes: Archaeological Survey in the Mediterranean Region. Vol Archaeological monographs of the British School at Rome. British School at Rome; 1991.
201.
Belcher M, Harrison A, Stoddart S. Analyzing Rome’s hinterland. In: Geographical Information Systems and Landscape Archaeology. Vol The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes. Oxbow; 1999:95-101.
202.
Flannery, Kent V. The Early Mesoamerican Village. Vol Studies in archeology. Academic Press; 1976.
203.
Flannery KV. Sampling on the Regional Level. In: The Early Mesoamerican Village. Vol Studies in archeology. Academic Press; 1976:131-160. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=76158fd1-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
204.
Hayes JW. The current state of Roman ceramic studies in Mediterranean survey, or handling pottery from surveys. In: Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages. Vol The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes. Oxbow; 2000:105-109.
205.
Lock G, Bell T, Lloyd J. Towards a methodology for modeling surface survey data: the Sangro Valley Project. In: Geographical Information Systems and Landscape Archaeology. Vol The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes. Oxbow; 1999:55-63. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=59347803-9036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
206.
Mattingly D. Methods of collection, recording and quantification. In: Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages. Vol The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes. Oxbow; 2000:5-15. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d1f3d1f6-075a-e911-80cd-005056af4099
207.
Mattingly D, Witcher R. Mapping the Roman world: the contribution of field survey data. In: Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxbow; 2004:173-188. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f3d0a902-8236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
208.
Millett M. Dating, quantifying and utilizing pottery assemblages from surface survey. In: Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages. Vol The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes. Oxbow; 2000:53-59.
209.
Orton CR. Covering the ground. In: Sampling in Archaeology. Vol Cambridge manuals in archaeology. Cambridge University Press; 2000:67-111. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=455f02ab-5b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
210.
Terrenato N. The visibility of sites and the interpretation of field survey results: towards an analysis of incomplete distributions. In: Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages. Vol The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes. Oxbow; 2000:60-71. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=cb022a17-9036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
211.
Terrenato N. "Sample size matters! The paradox of global trends and local surveys. In: Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxbow; 2004:36-48.
