Bibliography for ARCL2044: Theory and Methods for the Archaeology of the Ancient World: Kris Lockyear BETA

Alan P. Sullivan, III. ‘The Technology of Ceramic Reuse: Formation Processes and Archaeological Evidence’. World Archaeology 21.1 (1989): 101–114. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/124487>.

Alcock, S. E., J. F. Cherry, and J. L. Davies. ‘Intensive Survey, Agricultural Practices and the Classical Landscape of Greece’. Classical Greece: Ancient Histories and Modern Archaeologies. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 137–170. Print.

Alcock, Susan E. and Cherry, John F. Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxford: Oxbow, 2004. Print.

Allison, P. M. ‘Artefact Assemblages: Not the Pompeii Premise’. Papers of the Fourth Conference of Italian Archaeology. London: Accordia Research Centre, 1991. 49–56. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0b7c6260-8e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

---. ‘Artefact Distribution and Spatial Function in Pompeian Houses’. The Roman Family in Italy: Status, Sentiment, Space. OUP/HRC. Canberra: Humanities Research Centre, 1997. 321–354. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=79e1dcd6-4c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

---. ‘Introduction’. The Archaeology of Household Activities / Edited by Penelope M. Allison. N.p. 1–18. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&amp;isbn=9780203014929>.

---. ‘Labels for Ladles: Interpreting the Material Culture of Roman Householdsby Penelope M. Allison.’ The Archaeology of Household Activities / Edited by Penelope M. Allison. N.p. 57–77. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&amp;isbn=9780203014929>.

Andrews, Gill and English Heritage. Management of Archaeological Projects. London: English Heritage, 1991. Web. <http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue5/westhes/map2index.htm>.

Antonaccio, C. ‘Ethnicity and Colonization’. Ancient Perceptions of Greek Ethnicity. Center for Hellenic Studies colloquia. Washington, D.C.: Center for Hellenic Studies, Trustees for Harvard University, 2001. 113–157. Print.

Banning, E. ‘Research Design and Sampling’. The Archaeologist’s Laboratory: The Analysis of Archaeological Data. Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology. New York: London, 2000. 73–92. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=cfa3440e-4e67-e911-80cd-005056af4099>.

Barker, Graeme et al. Roman Landscapes: Archaeological Survey in the Mediterranean Region. Archaeological monographs of the British School at Rome. London: British School at Rome, 1991. Print.

Barker, Graeme, Hodges, Richard, and Clark, Gillian. A Mediterranean Valley: Landscape Archaeology and Annales History in the Biferno Valley. London: Leicester University Press, 1995. Print.

Barker, Graeme, Mattingly, D. J., and Unesco Libyan Valleys Archaeological Survey. Farming the Desert: The UNESCO Libyan Valleys Archaeological Survey. Paris: UNESCO, 1996. Print.

Barrett, J. ‘Agency, the Duality of Structure and the Problem of the Archaeological Record’. Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, 2001. 141–164. Web. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;AuthType=ip,shib&amp;db=nlebk&amp;AN=1101335&amp;site=ehost-live&amp;scope=site&amp;ebv=EK&amp;ppid=Page-__-76>.

Belcher, M., A. Harrison, and S. Stoddart. ‘Analyzing Rome’s Hinterland’. Geographical Information Systems and Landscape Archaeology. The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes. Oxford: Oxbow, 1999. 95–101. Print.

Bérard, Claude. A City of Images: Iconography and Society in Ancient Greece. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989. Print.

Biers, William R. Art, Artefacts, and Chronology in Classical Archaeology. Approaching the ancient world. London: Routledge, 1992. Print.

Bietti Sestieri, Anna Maria. The Iron Age Community of Osteria Dell’Osa: A Study of Socio-Political Development in Central Tyrrhenian Italy. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. Print.

Binford, L. ‘Archaeological Perspectives’. New Perspectives in Archaeology. Chicago: Aldine, 1968. 78–104. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6c608edf-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Binford, Lewis R. ‘A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design’. American Antiquity 29.4 (1964): 425–441. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/277978>.

Bintliff, J. L. ‘Settlement and Territory’. Companion Encyclopedia of Archaeology. Vol. 1. London: Routledge, 1999. 505–545. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=2585e681-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Bintliff, J. L. The Annales School and Archaeology. London: Leicester University Press, 1991. Web. <https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/7980>.

Blinkhorn, P.W., and C.G. Cumberpatch. ‘The Interpretation of Artefacts and the Tyranny of the Field Archaeologist’. Assemblage: the Sheffield graduate journal of archaeology 4 n. pag. Web. <https://assemblagejournal.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/blinkhorn-and-cumberpatch-1998-the-interpretation-of-artefacts-and-the-tyranny-of-the-field-archaeologist.pdf>.

Bon, S. E. ‘A City Frozen in Time or a Site in Perpetual Motion? Formation Processes at Pompeii’. Sequence and Space in Pompeii. Oxbow monograph. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1997. 7–12. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=123f78cd-8f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Bourdieu, P. ‘The Berber House or the World Reversed’. Rules and Meanings: The Anthropology of Everyday Knowledge : Selected Readings. Penguin modern sociology readings. Harmondsworth: Penguin Education, 1973. 98–110. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f96314a8-155a-e911-80cd-005056af4099>.

Bourdieu, Pierre and Nice, Richard. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge studies in social anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. Print.

Bowkett, L. et al. ‘Introduction’. Classical Archaeology in the Field: Approaches. Classical world series. London: Bristol Classical Press, 2001. 1–10. Print.

---. ‘The Development of Classical Archaeology’. Classical Archaeology in the Field: Approaches. Classical world series. London: Bristol Classical Press, 2001. 11–25. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=87753895-8936-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Bradley, R., and M. Fulford. ‘Sherd Size in the Analysis of Occupation Debris’. Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology 17 (1980): 85–94. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=de9090bc-4a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Ceserani, G. ‘Wilamowitz and Stratigraphy in 1873. A Case Study in the History of Archaeology’s “Great Divide”’. Archives, Ancestors, Practices: Archaeology in the Light of Its History. New York: Berghahn Books, 2008. 75–87. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d3623eb4-8536-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Cherry, J. ‘Power in Space: Archaeological and Geographical Studies of the State’. Landscape and Culture: Geographical and Archaeological Perspectives. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987. 146–172. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=90501fdd-5d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Childe, V. Gordon. What Happened in History. London: M. Parrish, 1960. Print.

Clarke, David. ‘Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence’. Antiquity 47.185 (1973): 6–18. Web.

---. ‘Archaeology: The Loss of Innocence’. Antiquity 47.185 (1973): 6–18. Web.

Cleuziou, S. et al. ‘The Use of Theory in French Archaeology’. Archaeological Theory in Europe: The Last Three Decades. Material cultures. London: Routledge, 1991. 91–128. Print.

Conkey, Margaret W., and Joan M. Gero. ‘Programme to Practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology’. Annual Review of Anthropology 26.1 (1997): 411–437. Web.

Cool, H. E. M. ‘An Overview of the Small Finds from Catterick’. Cataractonium: Roman Catterick and Its Hinterland : Excavations and Research, 1958-1997. Research report / Council for British Archaeology. York: Council for British Archaeology, 2002. 24–43. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a3e10cef-9036-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Cool, H. E. M., and M. J. Baxter. ‘Exploring Romano-British Finds Assemblages’. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 21.4 (2002): 365–380. Web.

Crummy, N. ‘Six Honest Serving Men: A Basic Methodology for the Study of Small Finds Conference Held at the Univeristy of Durham’. Roman Finds: Context and Theory : Proceedings of a Conference Held at the Univeristy of Durham. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2007. 59–66. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kw29ff>.

Cunliffe, B. ‘Hill-Forts and Oppida in Britain’. Problems in Economic and Social Archaeology. London: Duckworth, 1976. 343–358. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=33962b5c-6436-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Cuozzo, M.A. ‘Ancient Campania. Cultural Interaction, Political Borders and Geographical Boundaries’. Ancient Italy: Regions without Boundaries. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2007. 224–267. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=575d8078-0b08-e811-80cd-005056af4099>.

Cuozzo, Mariassunta. ‘Patterns of Organisation and Funerary Customs in the Cemetery of Pontecagnano (Salerno) During the Orientalising Period’. Journal of European Archaeology 2.2 (1994): 263–298. Web.

d’Agostino, B. ‘Military Organisation and Social Structure in Archaic Etruria’. The Greek City: From Homer to Alexander. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991. 59–82. Print.

---. ‘The Italian Perspective on Theoretical Archaeology’. Archaeological Theory in Europe: The Last Three Decades. Material cultures. London: Routledge, 1991. 52–64. Print.

Diaz-Andreu, M., and S. Lucy. ‘Introduction’. The Archaeology of Identity: Approaches to Gender, Age, Status, Ethnicity and Religion. London: Routledge, 2005. 1–13. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=b25f4f45-5336-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Díaz-Andreu, Margarita. Nationalism and Archaeology in Europe. Routledge, 2014. Web. <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315748221>.

Dietler, M., and I. Herbich. ‘Habitus, Techniques, Style: An Integrated Approach to the Social Understanding of Material Culture and Boundaries’. The Archaeology of Social Boundaries. Smithsonian series in archaeological inquiry. Washington [D.C.]: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1998. 232–263. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=01d474eb-7d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Dobres, M.-A., and J. E. Robb. ‘Agency in Archaeology: Paradigm or Platitude?’ Agency in Archaeology. London: Routledge, 2000. 3–17. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=37d0cb62-5336-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Dyson, Stephen L. ‘A Classical Archaeologist’s Response to the “New Archaeology”’. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 242.242 (1981): 7–13. Web.

---. ‘From New to New Age Archaeology: Archaeological Theory and Classical Archaeology-A 1990s Perspective’. American Journal of Archaeology 97.2 (1993): 195–206. Web.

---. In Pursuit of Ancient Pasts: A History of Classical Archaeology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npzcm>.

---. ‘The Role of Ideology and Institutions in Shaping Classical Archaeology in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries’. Tracing Archaeology’s Past: The Historiography of Archaeology. Publications in archaeology. Carbondale, Ill: Southern Illinois University Press, 1989. 127–135. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=bfc0d84c-6e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Fitzjohn, M. ‘A Cognitive Approach to an Upland Landscape’. Uplands of Ancient Sicily and Calabria: The Archaeology of Landscape Revisited. Accordia specialist studies on Italy. London: Accordia Research Institute, 2007. 143–155. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=572135d9-8e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Flannery, K. V. ‘Analysis on the Household Level/The Early Mesoamerican House’. The Early Mesoamerican Village. Studies in archeology. New York: Academic Press, 1976. 13–24. Print.

---. ‘Sampling on the Regional Level’. The Early Mesoamerican Village. Studies in archeology. New York: Academic Press, 1976. 131–160. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=76158fd1-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Flannery, Kent V. The Early Mesoamerican Village. Studies in archeology. New York: Academic Press, 1976. Print.

---. The Early Mesoamerican Village. Studies in archeology. New York: Academic Press, 1976. Print.

Fotiadis, Michael. ‘Cultural Identity and Regional Archaeological Projects’. Archaeological Dialogues 4.01 (1997): 102–113. Web.

Gardner, A. ‘Artefacts, Contexts, and the Archaeology of Social Practicess of a Conference Held at the Univeristy of Durham’. Roman Finds: Context and Theory : Proceedings of a Conference Held at the Univeristy of Durham. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2007. 128–139. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kw29ff>.

Gardner, Andrew. ‘Agency’. Handbook of Archaeological Theories. N.p., 2008. 95–108. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&amp;isbn=9780759113602>.

Gardner, Andrew. An Archaeology of Identity: Soldiers and Society in Late Roman Britain. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2007. Print.

Gell, A. ‘The Problem Defined’. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998. 1–11. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f6621786-4e67-e911-80cd-005056af4099>.

Giddens, Anthony. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1986. Web. <https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1221197>.

Given, Micheal. ‘Inventing the Eteocypriots: Imperialist Archaeology and the Manipulation of Ethnic Identity’. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 11.1 (1998): 3–29. Web.

Grahame, M. ‘Public and Private in the Roman House: The Spatial Order of the Casa Del Fauno’. Roman Finds: Context and Theory : Proceedings of a Conference Held at the Univeristy of Durham. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2007. 137–164. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kw29ff>.

Grahame, Mark. Reading Space: Social Interaction and Identity in the Houses of Roman Pompeii : A Syntactical Approach to the Analysis and Interpretation of Built Space. BAR international series. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2000. Print.

Green, Francis J., and Kris Lockyear. ‘Seeds, Sherds and Samples: Site Formation Processes at the Waitrose Site, Romsey’. Whither Environmental Archaeology?. Oxbow monograph. Oxbow, 1994. 91–104. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=1f953589-7736-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Hall, Jonathan M. ‘Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 8.02 (1998): 265–283. Web.

Hall, Jonathan M. Hellenicity: Between Ethnicity and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002. Print.

Halstead, Paul, Ian Hodder, and Glynis Jones. ‘Behavioural Archaeology and Refuse Patterns: A Case Study’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 11.2 (1978): 118–131. Web.

Hamilakis, Y. ‘Decolonizing Greek Archaeology: Indigenous Archaeologies, Modernist Archaeology and the Post-Colonial Critique’. A Singular Antiquity: Archaeology and Hellenic Identity in Twentieth-Century Greece. Mouseio Benaki. Athens: Benaki Museum, 2008. 273–284. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e15c9e59-4d67-e911-80cd-005056af4099>.

Hamilakis, Yannis. ‘Are We Postcolonial Yet? Tales from the Battlefield’. Archaeologies 8.1 (2012): 67–76. Web.

---. ‘Museums of Oblivion’. Antiquity 85.328 (2011): 625–629. Web.

Hamilakis, Yannis. The Nation and Its Ruins: Antiquity, Archaeology, and National Imagination in Greece. Classical presences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Print.

Hamilakis, Yannis, and Eleana Yalouri. ‘Antiquities as Symbolic Capital in Modern Greek Society’. Antiquity 70.267 (1996): 117–129. Web.

Hassan, Fekri A. ‘Beyond the Surface: Comments on Hodder’s “Reflexive Excavation Methodology”’. Antiquity 71.274 (1997): 1020–1025. Web.

Hawkes, Christopher. ‘Archaeological Theory and Method: Some Suggestions from the Old World’. American Anthropologist 56.2 (1954): 155–168. Web.

Hayden, Brian, and Aubrey Cannon. ‘Where the Garbage Goes: Refuse Disposal in the Maya Highlands’. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2.2 (1983): 117–163. Web.

Hayes, J. W. ‘The Current State of Roman Ceramic Studies in Mediterranean Survey, or Handling Pottery from Surveys’. Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages. The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes. Oxford: Oxbow, 2000. 105–109. Print.

Higgs, E. S., and C. Vita-Finzi. ‘Prehistoric Economies: A Territorial Approach’. Papers in Economic Prehistory: Studies by Members and Associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. London: Cambridge University Press, 1972. 27–36. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ce479ae8-0608-e811-80cd-005056af4099>.

Hingley, R. ‘Cultural Diversity and Unity: Empire and Rome’. Material Culture and Social Identities in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 54–75. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4073012d-5c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Hobsbawm, Eric, and Terence Ranger, eds. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Web. <http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781107295636>.

Hodder, Ian. ‘“Always Momentary, Fluid and Flexible”: Towards a Reflexive Excavation Methodology’. Antiquity 71.273 (1997): 691–700. Web.

---. ‘Contextual Archaeology’. Reading the Past: Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology. N.p., 2003. 156–205. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&amp;isbn=9780511562136>.

---. ‘Crises in Global Archaeology’. The Archaeological Process: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. 1–19. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=aa824ea4-5e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

---. ‘Introduction: Contemporary Theoretical Debate in Archaeology’. Archaeological Theory Today. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2012. 1–14. Web. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;AuthType=ip,shib&amp;db=nlebk&amp;AN=1101335&amp;site=ehost-live&amp;scope=site&amp;ebv=EK&amp;ppid=Page-__-1>.

---. ‘Whose Rationality? A Response to Fekri Hassan’. Antiquity 72.275 (1998): 213–217. Web.

Hodder, Ian, and Scott Hudson. ‘The Problem’. Reading the Past : Current Approaches to Interpretation in Archaeology / Ian Hodder and Scott Hutson. N.p. 1–19. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&amp;isbn=9780511562136>.

Horden, Peregrine and Purcell, Nicholas. The Corrupting Sea: A Study of Mediterranean History. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2000. Print.

Ian Hodder. ‘Theoretical Archaeology: A Reactionary View’. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Ed. Ian Hodder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. 1–16. Web. <http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511558252>.

Interpretative Archaeology. Bloomsbury Academic, 1993. Web. <http://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/interpretative-archaeology>.

Izzet, V. ‘Etruria and the Etruscans. Recent Approaches’. Ancient Italy: Regions without Boundaries. Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2007. 114–130. Print.

---. ‘Holding a Mirror to Etruscan Gender’. Gender and Italian Archaeology: Challenging the Stereotypes. Accordia specialist studies on Italy. London: Accordia Research Institute, 1998. 209–227. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ec69728f-8e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

James Whitley. ‘Social Diversity in Dark Age Greece’. The Annual of the British School at Athens 86 (1991): 341–365. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/30102882>.

Jansen, Gemma C. M. ‘Systems for the Disposal of Waste and Excreta in Roman Cities. The Situation in Pompeii, Herculaneum and Ostia’. Sordes Urbis: La Eliminación de Residuos En La Ciudad Romana : Actas de La Reunión de Roma (15-16 de Noviembre de 1996). Bibliotheca Italica : monografías de la Escuela Española de Historia y Arqueología en Roma. Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2000. 37–50. Print.

Johnson, M. ‘Culture as System’. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. 64–84. Print.

Johnson, Matthew. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. Print.

---. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. Print.

Johnson, Matthew. ‘Common Sense Is Not Enough’. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 1–12. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=017e9e8d-0208-e811-80cd-005056af4099>.

---. ‘The “New Archaeology”’. Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010. 12–34. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c030bb34-7a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Jonathan Friedman. ‘The Past in the Future: History and the Politics of Identity’. American Anthropologist 94.4 837–859. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/680224>.

Jones, S. ‘Discourses of Identity in the Interpretation of the Past’. Cultural Identity and Archaeology: The Construction of European Communities. Theoretical Archaeology Group (TAG). London: Routledge, 1996. 62–80. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8c7bba35-5236-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Knapp, A. B., and W. Ashmore. ‘Archaeological Landscapes: Constructed, Conceptualized, Ideational’. Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives. Social archaeology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers, 1999. 1–30. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ad4ce8e9-5e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Knapp, A. Bernard, and Lynn Meskell. ‘Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus’. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 7.02 (1997): 183–204. Web.

Kotsakis, K. ‘The Powerful Past: Theoretical Trends in Greek Archaeology’. Archaeological Theory in Europe: The Last Three Decades. Material cultures. London: Routledge, 1991. 65–90. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a58826a0-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Kurtz, D. C. ‘Beazley and the Connoisseurship of Greek Vases’. Greek Vases in the J. Paul Getty Museum: Vol.2. Occasional papers on antiquities. Malibu, Calif: J. Paul Getty Museum, 1985. 237–250. Print.

LaMotta, V. M., and M. B. Schiffer. ‘The Formation Processes of House Floor Assemblages’. The Archaeology of Household Activities / Edited by Penelope M. Allison. N.p. 19–29. Web. <https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780203014929/startPage/16/1>.

Laurence, Ray. Roman Pompeii: Space and Society. London: Routledge, 1994. Print.

Lewis R. Binford. ‘Behavioral Archaeology and the “Pompeii Premise”’. Journal of Anthropological Research 37.3 (1981): 195–208. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629723>.

Liebschuetz, W. ‘Rubbish Disposal in Greek and Roman Cities’. Sordes Urbis: La Eliminación de Residuos En La Ciudad Romana : Actas de La Reunión de Roma (15-16 de Noviembre de 1996). Bibliotheca Italica : monografías de la Escuela Española de Historia y Arqueología en Roma. Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2000. 51–62. Print.

Lissarrague, F. ‘Epiktetos Egraphsen: The Writing on the Cup’. Art and Text in Ancient Greek Culture. Cambridge studies in new art history and criticism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 12–27. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=01b654c8-5a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Lock, G., T. Bell, and J. Lloyd. ‘Towards a Methodology for Modeling Surface Survey Data: The Sangro Valley Project’. Geographical Information Systems and Landscape Archaeology. The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes. Oxford: Oxbow, 1999. 55–63. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=59347803-9036-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Lockyear, Kris. Patterns and Process in Late Roman Republican Coin Hoards, 157-2 BC. BAR international series. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2007. Print.

Lockyear, Kris. ‘Site Finds in Roman Britain: A Comparison of Techniques’. Oxford Journal of Archaeology 19.4 (2000): 397–423. Web.

Lowenthal, David. The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Web. <http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511523809>.

Lucas, Gavin. ‘Splitting Objects’. Critical Approaches to Fieldwork : Contemporary and Historical Archaeological Practice / Gavin Lucas. N.p. 64–106. Web. <http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&amp;isbn=9780203132258>.

Lynn Meskell. ‘The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology’. Annual Review of Anthropology 31 (2002): 279–301. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132881>.

M. Shanks, C. Tilley. ‘Ideology, Symbolic Power and Ritual Communication: A Reinterpretation of Neolithic Mortuary Practices’. Symbolic and Structural Archaeology. Ed. Ian Hodder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982. 129–161. Web. <http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511558252>.

Malkin, Irad. ‘Postcolonial Concepts and Ancient Greek Colonization’. MLQ: Modern Language Quarterly 65.3 (2004): 341–364. Web. <http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/modern_language_quarterly/v065/65.3malkin.html>.

Marchand, Suzanne L. Down from Olympus: Archaeology and Philhellenism in Germany, 1750-1970. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1996. Print.

Mattingly, D. ‘Methods of Collection, Recording and Quantification’. Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages. The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes. Oxford: Oxbow, 2000. 5–15. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d1f3d1f6-075a-e911-80cd-005056af4099>.

Mattingly, D., and R. Witcher. ‘Mapping the Roman World: The Contribution of Field Survey Data’. Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxford: Oxbow, 2004. 173–188. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f3d0a902-8236-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Mauss, M. ‘Body Techniques’. Sociology and Psychology: Essays. London [etc.]: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979. 95–123. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=7d8e026e-6236-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Meskell (ed.), Lynn. Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Routledge, 2002. Web. <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203029817>.

Meskell, L. ‘Archaeologies of Identity’. Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, 2001. 187–213. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a382cfcd-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

---. ‘Archaeologies of Identity’. Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, 2001. 187–213. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e0a1019e-0a08-e811-80cd-005056af4099>.

Meskell, Lynn. Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et Cetera in Ancient Egypt. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. Print.

Meskell, Lynn. ‘The Somatization of Archaeology: Institutions, Discourses, Corporeality’. Norwegian Archaeological Review 29.1 (1996): 1–16. Web.

Michael Dietler. ‘“Our Ancestors the Gauls”: Archaeology, Ethnic Nationalism, and the Manipulation of Celtic Identity in Modern Europe’. American Anthropologist 96.3 584–605. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/682302>.

Michael Fotiadis. ‘Modernity and the Past-Still-Present: Politics of Time in the Birth of Regional Archaeological Projects in Greece’. American Journal of Archaeology 99.1 59–78. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/506879>.

Michael Vickers. ‘Value and Simplicity: Eighteenth-Century Taste and the Study of Greek Vases’. Past & Present 116 98–137. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/650882>.

Millett, M. ‘Dating, Quantifying and Utilizing Pottery Assemblages from Surface Survey’. Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages. The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes. Oxford: Oxbow, 2000. 53–59. Print.

---. ‘Experiments in the Analysis of Finds Deposition at Shiptonthorpe: A Retrospect’. Roman Finds: Context and Theory : Proceedings of a Conference Held at the Univeristy of Durham. Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2007. 100–105. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kw29ff>.

Milne, G. ‘The Archaeologist as Alchemist’. From Roman Basilica to Medieval Market: Archaeology in Action in the City of London. London: HMSO, 1992. 51–59. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c3113bbe-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Momigliano, Arnaldo. ‘Ancient History and the Antiquarian’. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 13.3/4 (1950): 285–315. Web.

Moore, H. ‘Bodies on the Move: Gender, Power and Material Culture’. A Passion for Difference: Essays in Anthropology and Gender. Cambridge: Polity, 1994. 71–85. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ed370090-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Morgan, Catherine. ‘Ethnicity and Early Greek States: Historical and Material Perspectives’. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 37 (1992): 131–163. Web.

Morgan, Catherine, and Todd Whitelaw. ‘Pots and Politics: Ceramic Evidence for the Rise of the Argive State’. American Journal of Archaeology 95.1 (1991): 79–108. Web.

Morris, I. ‘Archaeology and Gender Ideologies in Early Archaic Greece’. Sex and Difference in Ancient Greece and Rome. Edinburgh readings on the ancient world. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2003. 264–275. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=67759abe-6836-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

---. ‘Archaeology as Cultural History’. Archaeology as Cultural History: Words and Things in Iron Age Greece. Social archaeology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2000. 3–36. Print.

---. ‘Periodization and the Heroes: Inventing a Dark Age’. Inventing Ancient Culture: Historicism, Periodization and the Ancient World. London: Routledge, 1997. 96–131. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0e127228-5236-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

---. ‘The Past, the East and the Hero of Lefkandi’. Archaeology as Cultural History: Words and Things in Iron Age Greece. Social archaeology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2000. 195–256. Print.

Morris, Ian. ‘Archaeologies of Greece’. Archaeology as Cultural History: Words and Things in Iron Age Greece. Social archaeology. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2000. 37–76. Print.

---. Burial and Ancient Society: The Rise of the Greek City-State. New studies in archaelogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. Web. <http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01457>.

---. ‘The Anthropology of a Dead World’. Death-Ritual and Social Structure in Classical Antiquity. Key themes in ancient history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. 1–30. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c4ad4e7d-5a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Nevett, Lisa C. House and Society in the Ancient Greek World. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. Print.

Odermatt, Peter. ‘Built Heritage and the Politics of (Re) Presentation’. Archaeological Dialogues 3.02 (1996): 95–119. Web.

Orton, C. R. ‘Covering the Ground’. Sampling in Archaeology. Cambridge manuals in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 67–111. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=455f02ab-5b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

---. ‘Two Useful Parameters for Pottery Research’. Computer Applications in Archaeology 1985: Proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Methods, Institute of Archaeology, London, March 29-30, 1985. London: University of London, Institute of Archaeology, 1986. 114–120. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2f76d612-1c46-e711-80cb-005056af4099>.

Orton, Clive, and Michael Hughes. Pottery in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Web. <http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511920066>.

Osborne, R. ‘Looking on Greek Style: Does the Sculpted Girl Speak to Women Too’. Classical Greece: Ancient Histories and Modern Archaeologies. New directions in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. 81–96. Print.

---. ‘W(h)Ither Orientalization?’ Debating Orientalization: Multidisciplinary Approaches to Processes of Change in the Ancient Mediterranean. Monographs in Mediterranean archaeology. London: Equinox, 2006. 153–158. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ff782124-8636-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Osborne, R., and S. Alcock. ‘Introduction’. Classical Archaeology. Blackwell studies in global archaeology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2007. 1–8. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a34f9f92-5f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Patty Jo Watson and Michael Fotiadis. ‘The Razor’s Edge: Symbolic-Structuralist Archeology and the Expansion of Archeological Inference’. American Anthropologist 92.3 613–629. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/680338>.

Paul Sant Cassia. ‘Tradition, Tourism and Memory in Malta’. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 5.2 247–263. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2660696>.

Payne, S. ‘Partial Recovery and Sample Bias: The Results of Some Sieving Experiments’. Papers in Economic Prehistory: Studies by Members and Associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture. London: Cambridge University Press, 1972. 49–64. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=41494f18-5936-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Peña, J. Theodore. Roman Pottery in the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Web. <https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9780511499685/type/book>.

Peter E. Siegel and Peter G. Roe. ‘Shipibo Archaeo-Ethnography: Site Formation Processes and Archaeological Interpretation’. World Archaeology 18.1 (1986): 96–115. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/124664>.

Peter van Dommelen. ‘Colonial Constructs: Colonialism and Archaeology in the Mediterranean’. World Archaeology 28.3 305–323. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/125021>.

Pierre Nora. ‘Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire’. Representations 26 7–24. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/2928520>.

Rackham, O. ‘Ancient Landscapes’. The Greek City: From Homer to Alexander. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991. 85–111. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ef0e44c9-4c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Rautman, Alison E. and Gender and Archaeology Conference. Reading the Body: Representations and Remains in the Archaeological Record. Regendering the past. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000. Print.

Redman, Charles L. ‘Multistage Fieldwork and Analytical Techniques’. American Antiquity 38.1 61–79. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/279311>.

---. ‘Surface Collection, Sampling, and Research Design: A Retrospective’. American Antiquity 52.2 249–265. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/281779>.

Reece, R. ‘The Interpretation of Site Finds — a Review’. Coin Finds and Coin Use in the Roman World: The Thirteenth Oxford Symposium on Coinage and Monetary History, 25.-27.3.1993 : A NATO Advanced Research Workshop. Studien zu Fundmünzen der Antike. Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag, 1996. 341–355. Print.

Renfrew, A. C. ‘Space, Time and Polity’. The Evolution of Social Systems: Proceedings of a Meeting of the Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects Held at the Institute of Archaeology, London University. NW1 [i.e. London]: Duckworth, 1977. 89–112. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ab131751-6436-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Renfrew, C. ‘The Multiplier Effect in Action’. Approaches to Social Archaeology. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1984. 283–308. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=fd5ffdf7-5f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Rowlands, M. ‘The Politics of Identity in Archaeology’. Social Construction of the Past: Representation as Power. One world archaeology. London: Routledge, 1994. 129–143. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=5aacb0fb-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Schiffer, Michael B. ‘Archaeological Context and Systemic Context’. American Antiquity 37.2 (1972): 156–165. Web.

---. ‘Archaeological Context and Systemic Context’. American Antiquity 37.2 (1972): 156–165. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/278203>.

Schiffer, Michael B. Formation Processes of the Archaeological Record. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press, 1987. Web. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;AuthType=ip,shib&amp;db=nlebk&amp;AN=10467&amp;site=ehost-live&amp;scope=site&amp;ebv=EB&amp;ppid=pp_COVER>.

Schnapp, A. ‘Eros the Hunter’. A City of Images: Iconography and Society in Ancient Greece. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989. 71–87. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=b038aa25-6136-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Schnapp, Alain. The Discovery of the Past: The Origins of Archaeology. London: British Museum Press, 1996. Print.

Sewell, W. H. ‘The Concept(s) of Culture’. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago studies in practices of meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. 152–174. Print.

Shanks, M. ‘Cities and Sanctuaries, Art and Archaeology: Roots in the Past’. Classical Archaeology of Greece: Experiences of the Discipline. The experience of archaeology. London: Routledge, 1995. 21–51. Print.

---. ‘Style and the Design of a Perfume Jar from an Archaic Greek City State’. Contemporary Archaeology in Theory: [A Reader]. Social archaeology. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell, 1996. 364–393. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=32a31a7d-5e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Shanks, M., and I. Hodder. ‘Processual, Postprocessual and Interpretive Archaeologies’. Interpreting Archaeology: Finding Meaning in the Past. London: Routledge, 1994. 3–28. Web. <https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317799467>.

Shanks, M., and C. Tilley. ‘The Individual and the Social’. Social Theory and Archaeology. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell, 1987. 61–78. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=07ba3ee9-6636-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Shanks, Michael. ‘Rudiments of a Social Archaeology (Chapter 5)’. Classical Archaeology of Greece: Experiences of the Discipline. The experience of archaeology. London: Routledge, 1995. 118–153. Print.

Shanks, Michael and Tilley, Christopher Y. Re-Constructing Archaeology: Theory and Practice. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. Print.

Snodgrass, A. ‘The First Figure Scenes in Greek Art’. An Archaeology of Greece: The Present State and Future Scope of a Discipline. Sather classical lectures. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987. 132–169. Print.

---. ‘The Health of a Discipline’. An Archaeology of Greece: The Present State and Future Scope of a Discipline. Sather classical lectures. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987. 1–36. Print.

Snodgrass, A. M. ‘The New Archaeology and the Classical Archaeologist’. American Journal of Archaeology 89.1 (1985): 31–37. Web.

Snodgrass, Anthony M. Archaic Greece: The Age of Experiment. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 1980. Print.

Sofaer, Joanna R. The Body as Material Culture: A Theoretical Osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Web. <http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511816666>.

Sparkes, Brian A. The Red and the Black: Studies in Greek Pottery. London: Routledge, 1996. Print.

Stewart, A. ‘Reflections’. Sexuality in Ancient Art: Near East, Egypt, Greece and Italy. Cambridge studies in new art history and criticsm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 136–154. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d0bd0a7c-5b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Tanner, J. ‘Culture, Social Structure and Artistic Agency in Classical Greece’. The Invention of Art History in Ancient Greece: Religion, Society and Artistic Rationalisation. Cambridge classical studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 141–204. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f7d2a9ba-5c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Tarlow, Sarah, Hamilakis, Yannis, and Pluciennik, Mark. Thinking through the Body: Archaeologies of Corporeality. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2002. Print.

Terrenato, N. ‘"Sample Size Matters! The Paradox of Global Trends and Local Surveys’. Side-by-Side Survey: Comparative Regional Studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxford: Oxbow, 2004. 36–48. Print.

---. ‘“Start the Revolution without Me”: Recent Debates in Italian Classical Archaeology’. Papers in Italian Archaeology VI: Communities and Settlements from the Neolithic to the Early Medieval Period : Proceedings of the 6th Conference of Italian Archaeology Held at the Univrsity of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, the Netherlands, April 15-17, 2003. BAR international series. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2005. 39–43. Print.

---. ‘The Visibility of Sites and the Interpretation of Field Survey Results: Towards an Analysis of Incomplete Distributions’. Extracting Meaning from Ploughsoil Assemblages. The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes. Oxford: Oxbow, 2000. 60–71. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=cb022a17-9036-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Terrenato, Nicola. ‘The Innocents and the Sceptics: ANTIQUITY and Classical Archaeology’. Antiquity 76.294 (2002): 1104–1111. Web. <https://search.proquest.com/docview/217558742?accountid=14511>.

Thomas, J. ‘Archaeologies of Place and Landscape’. Archaeological Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity, 2001. 165–186. Web. <http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&amp;AuthType=ip,shib&amp;db=nlebk&amp;AN=1101335&amp;site=ehost-live&amp;scope=site&amp;ebv=EK&amp;ppid=Page-__-85>.

---. ‘Where Are We Now? Archaeological Theory in the 1990s’. Theory in Archaeology: A World Perspective. London: Routledge, 1994. 343–362. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=db055f42-5236-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Tilley, C. ‘Space, Place, Landscape and Perception: Phenomenological Perspectives’. A Phenomenology of Landscape: Places, Paths, and Monuments. Explorations in anthropology. Oxford: Berg, 1994. 7–34. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c375a3b7-8b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Trigger, B. G. ‘Current Trends in American Archaeology’. Time and Traditions: Essays in Archaeological Interpretation. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1978. 2–18. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=17761142-7136-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Tyers, P. ‘Sources for the Study of Roman Pottery’. Roman Pottery in Britain. London: Batsford, 1996. 24–35. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f9cfe4ff-6236-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

van Dommelen, P. ‘Cultural Imaginings. Punic Tradition and Local Identity in Roman Republican Sardinia’. Italy and the West: Comparative Issues in Romanization. Oxford: Oxbow, 2001. 68–84. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=cdd86dae-8136-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

---. ‘Punic Persistence: Colonialism and Cultural Identity in Roman Sardinia’. Cultural Identity in the Roman Empire. London: Routledge, 1998. 25–48. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=407c43b5-5236-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Vives-Ferrándiz Sánchez, J. ‘Colonial Encounters and the Negotiation of Identities in South-East Iberia’. Mediterranean Crossroads. Athens: Pierides Foundation, 2007. 537–562. Print.

W. Raymond Wood and Donald Lee Johnson. ‘A Survey of Disturbance Processes in Archaeological Site Formation’. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 1 (1978): 315–381. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170136>.

Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew. Houses and Society in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994. Print.

Whitley, James. ‘Beazley as Theorist’. Antiquity 71.271 (1997): 40–47. Web.

---. ‘Introduction: Classical Archaeology and Its Objects’. The Archaeology of Ancient Greece. Cambridge world archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 3–16. Web. <https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=1bc8b1eb-5b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099>.

Whitley, James. Style and Society in Dark Age Greece: The Changing Face of a Pre-Literate Society, 1100-700 B.C. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991. Print.

Woolf, Greg. Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998. Web. <http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511518614>.

Woolf, Greg, and Chris Gosden. ‘Beyond Romans and Natives.’ World Archaeology 28.3 (1997): 339–350. Web. <https://www.jstor.org/stable/125023>.

Yalouri, Eleana. The Acropolis: Global Fame, Local Claim. Materializing culture. Oxford: Berg, 2001. Print.

Yates, T. ‘Frameworks for an Archaeology of the Body’. Interpretative Archaeology. Explorations in anthropology. Oxford, UK: Berg, 1992. 31–72. Web. <https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/interpretative-archaeology/>.

Yiannis Papadakis. ‘Greek Cypriot Narratives of History and Collective Identity: Nationalism as a Contested Process’. American Ethnologist 25.2 149–165. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/646690>.