[1]
M. Johnson, ‘Common sense is not enough’, in Archaeological theory: an introduction, 2nd ed., Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 1–12 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=017e9e8d-0208-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[2]
I. Morris, ‘Archaeologies of Greece’, in Archaeology as cultural history: words and things in Iron Age Greece, vol. Social archaeology, Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2000, pp. 37–76.
[3]
J. Whitley, ‘Introduction: Classical Archaeology and its objects’, in The archaeology of ancient Greece, vol. Cambridge world archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001, pp. 3–16 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=1bc8b1eb-5b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[4]
A. Snodgrass, ‘The health of a discipline’, in An archaeology of Greece: the present state and future scope of a discipline, vol. Sather classical lectures, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987, pp. 1–36.
[5]
W. R. Biers, Art, artefacts, and chronology in classical archaeology, vol. Approaching the ancient world. London: Routledge, 1992.
[6]
I. Hodder, ‘Introduction: Contemporary Theoretical Debate in Archaeology’, in Archaeological theory today, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Polity, 2012, pp. 1–14 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EK&ppid=Page-__-1
[7]
I. Hodder and S. Hudson, ‘The problem’, in Reading the past : current approaches to interpretation in archaeology / Ian Hodder and Scott Hutson., pp. 1–19 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780511562136
[8]
I. Hodder, ‘Crises in Global Archaeology’, in The archaeological process: an introduction, Oxford: Blackwell, 1999, pp. 1–19 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=aa824ea4-5e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[9]
I. Morris, ‘Periodization and the heroes: Inventing a dark age’, in Inventing ancient culture: historicism, periodization and the ancient world, London: Routledge, 1997, pp. 96–131 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0e127228-5236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[10]
C. Hawkes, ‘Archaeological theory and method: some suggestions from the Old World’, American Anthropologist, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 155–168, 1954, doi: 10.1525/aa.1954.56.2.02a00660.
[11]
R. Osborne and S. Alcock, ‘Introduction’, in Classical archaeology, vol. Blackwell studies in global archaeology, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2007, pp. 1–8 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a34f9f92-5f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[12]
N. Terrenato, ‘The innocents and the sceptics: ANTIQUITY and classical archaeology’, Antiquity, vol. 76, no. 294, pp. 1104–1111, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://search.proquest.com/docview/217558742?accountid=14511
[13]
M. Shanks, ‘Cities and sanctuaries, art and archaeology: roots in the past’, in Classical archaeology of Greece: experiences of the discipline, vol. The experience of archaeology, London: Routledge, 1995, pp. 21–51.
[14]
S. L. Dyson, ‘The role of ideology and institutions in shaping classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries’, in Tracing archaeology’s past: the historiography of archaeology, vol. Publications in archaeology, Carbondale, Ill: Southern Illinois University Press, 1989, pp. 127–135 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=bfc0d84c-6e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[15]
D. C. Kurtz, ‘Beazley and the connoisseurship of Greek vases’, in Greek vases in the J. Paul Getty Museum: Vol.2, vol. Occasional papers on antiquities, Malibu, Calif: J. Paul Getty Museum, 1985, pp. 237–250.
[16]
J. Whitley, ‘Beazley as theorist’, Antiquity, vol. 71, no. 271, pp. 40–47, Mar. 1997, doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00084520.
[17]
G. Ceserani, ‘Wilamowitz and stratigraphy in 1873. A case study in the history of archaeology’s “Great Divide”’, in Archives, ancestors, practices: archaeology in the light of its history, New York: Berghahn Books, 2008, pp. 75–87 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d3623eb4-8536-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[18]
V. G. Childe, What happened in history. London: M. Parrish, 1960.
[19]
D. Clarke, ‘Archaeology: the loss of innocence’, Antiquity, vol. 47, no. 185, pp. 6–18, Mar. 1973, doi: 10.1017/S0003598X0003461X.
[20]
S. L. Dyson, In pursuit of ancient pasts: a history of classical archaeology in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1npzcm
[21]
A. Momigliano, ‘Ancient History and the Antiquarian’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, vol. 13, no. 3/4, pp. 285–315, 1950, doi: 10.2307/750215.
[22]
B. A. Sparkes, The red and the black: studies in Greek pottery. London: Routledge, 1996.
[23]
A. Schnapp, The discovery of the past: the origins of archaeology. London: British Museum Press, 1996.
[24]
Michael Vickers, ‘Value and Simplicity: Eighteenth-Century Taste and the Study of Greek Vases’, Past & Present, no. 116, pp. 98–137 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/650882
[25]
S. L. Dyson, ‘A Classical Archaeologist’s Response to the “New Archaeology”’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, vol. 242, no. 242, pp. 7–13, 1981, doi: 10.2307/1356543.
[26]
M. Johnson, ‘The “New Archaeology”’, in Archaeological theory: an introduction, 2nd ed., Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010, pp. 12–34 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c030bb34-7a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[27]
D. Clarke, ‘Archaeology: the loss of innocence’, Antiquity, vol. 47, no. 185, pp. 6–18, Mar. 1973, doi: 10.1017/S0003598X0003461X.
[28]
M. Shanks, ‘Rudiments of a social archaeology (Chapter 5)’, in Classical archaeology of Greece: experiences of the discipline, vol. The experience of archaeology, London: Routledge, 1995, pp. 118–153.
[29]
A. M. Snodgrass, ‘The New Archaeology and the Classical Archaeologist’, American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 1985, doi: 10.2307/504768.
[30]
L. Binford, ‘Archaeological perspectives’, in New perspectives in archaeology, Chicago: Aldine, 1968, pp. 78–104 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=6c608edf-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[31]
Ian Hodder, ‘Theoretical archaeology: a reactionary view’, in Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, I. Hodder, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. 1–16 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511558252
[32]
M. Johnson, ‘Culture as system’, in Archaeological theory: an introduction, Oxford: Blackwell, 1999, pp. 64–84.
[33]
C. Morgan and T. Whitelaw, ‘Pots and Politics: Ceramic Evidence for the Rise of the Argive State’, American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 79–108, 1991, doi: 10.2307/505158.
[34]
I. Morris, Burial and ancient society: the rise of the Greek city-state, vol. New studies in archaelogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987 [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb.01457
[35]
C. Renfrew, ‘The multiplier effect in action’, in Approaches to social archaeology, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1984, pp. 283–308 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=fd5ffdf7-5f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[36]
Snodgrass, Anthony M., Archaic Greece: the age of experiment. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 1980.
[37]
M. B. Schiffer, ‘Archaeological Context and Systemic Context’, American Antiquity, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 156–165, 1972, doi: 10.2307/278203.
[38]
B. G. Trigger, ‘Current trends in American archaeology’, in Time and traditions: essays in archaeological interpretation, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1978, pp. 2–18 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=17761142-7136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[39]
Whitley, James, Style and society in dark age Greece: the changing face of a pre-literate society, 1100-700 B.C., vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
[40]
James Whitley, ‘Social Diversity in Dark Age Greece’, The Annual of the British School at Athens, vol. 86, pp. 341–365, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30102882
[41]
J. Cherry, ‘Power in space: archaeological and geographical studies of the state’, in Landscape and culture: geographical and archaeological perspectives, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987, pp. 146–172 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=90501fdd-5d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[42]
J. Thomas, ‘Archaeologies of place and landscape’, in Archaeological theory today, Cambridge: Polity, 2001, pp. 165–186 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EK&ppid=Page-__-85
[43]
Horden, Peregrine and Purcell, Nicholas, The corrupting sea: a study of Mediterranean history. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2000.
[44]
S. E. Alcock, J. F. Cherry, and J. L. Davies, ‘Intensive survey, agricultural practices and the classical landscape of Greece’, in Classical Greece: ancient histories and modern archaeologies, vol. New directions in archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 137–170.
[45]
Alcock, Susan E. and Cherry, John F., Side-by-side survey: comparative regional studies in the Mediterranean World. Oxford: Oxbow, 2004.
[46]
J. L. Bintliff, ‘Settlement and territory’, in Companion encyclopedia of archaeology, vol. 1, London: Routledge, 1999, pp. 505–545 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=2585e681-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[47]
B. Cunliffe, ‘Hill-Forts and oppida in Britain’, in Problems in economic and social archaeology, London: Duckworth, 1976, pp. 343–358 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=33962b5c-6436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[48]
M. Fitzjohn, ‘A cognitive approach to an upland landscape’, in Uplands of ancient Sicily and Calabria: the archaeology of landscape revisited, vol. Accordia specialist studies on Italy, London: Accordia Research Institute, 2007, pp. 143–155 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=572135d9-8e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[49]
E. S. Higgs and C. Vita-Finzi, ‘Prehistoric Economies: a territorial approach’, in Papers in economic prehistory: studies by members and associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture, London: Cambridge University Press, 1972, pp. 27–36 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ce479ae8-0608-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[50]
A. B. Knapp and W. Ashmore, ‘Archaeological Landscapes: Constructed, Conceptualized, Ideational’, in Archaeologies of landscape: contemporary perspectives, vol. Social archaeology, Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers, 1999, pp. 1–30 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ad4ce8e9-5e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[51]
O. Rackham, ‘Ancient landscapes’, in The Greek city: from Homer to Alexander, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991, pp. 85–111 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ef0e44c9-4c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[52]
A. C. Renfrew, ‘Space, time and polity’, in The evolution of social systems: proceedings of a meeting of the Research Seminar in Archaeology and Related Subjects held at the Institute of Archaeology, London University, NW1 [i.e. London]: Duckworth, 1977, pp. 89–112 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ab131751-6436-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[53]
C. Tilley, ‘Space, place, landscape and perception: phenomenological perspectives’, in A phenomenology of landscape: places, paths, and monuments, vol. Explorations in anthropology, Oxford: Berg, 1994, pp. 7–34 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c375a3b7-8b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[54]
S. L. Dyson, ‘From New to New Age Archaeology: Archaeological Theory and Classical Archaeology-A 1990s Perspective’, American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 195–206, 1993, doi: 10.2307/505656.
[55]
Johnson, Matthew, Archaeological theory: an introduction, 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
[56]
I. Morris, ‘Archaeology as cultural history’, in Archaeology as cultural history: words and things in Iron Age Greece, vol. Social archaeology, Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2000, pp. 3–36.
[57]
I. Morris, ‘The past, the east and the hero of Lefkandi’, in Archaeology as cultural history: words and things in Iron Age Greece, vol. Social archaeology, Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 2000, pp. 195–256.
[58]
M. Shanks and I. Hodder, ‘Processual, postprocessual and interpretive archaeologies’, in Interpreting archaeology: finding meaning in the past, London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 3–28 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781317799467
[59]
I. Hodder, ‘Contextual archaeology’, in Reading the past: current approaches to interpretation in archaeology, 2003, pp. 156–205 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780511562136
[60]
M. Shanks, ‘Style and the design of a perfume jar from an Archaic Greek city state’, in Contemporary archaeology in theory: [a reader], vol. Social archaeology, Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell, 1996, pp. 364–393 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=32a31a7d-5e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[61]
M. Shanks, C. Tilley, ‘Ideology, Symbolic Power and Ritual Communication: A Reinterpretation of Neolithic Mortuary Practices’, in Symbolic and Structural Archaeology, I. Hodder, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982, pp. 129–161 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511558252
[62]
Shanks, Michael and Tilley, Christopher Y., Re-constructing archaeology: theory and practice, vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
[63]
A. Snodgrass, ‘The first figure scenes in Greek art’, in An archaeology of Greece: the present state and future scope of a discipline, vol. Sather classical lectures, Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987, pp. 132–169.
[64]
Interpretative Archaeology. Bloomsbury Academic, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/interpretative-archaeology
[65]
J. Thomas, ‘Where are we now? Archaeological theory in the 1990s’, in Theory in archaeology: a world perspective, London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 343–362 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=db055f42-5236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[66]
Patty Jo Watson and Michael Fotiadis, ‘The Razor’s Edge: Symbolic-Structuralist Archeology and the Expansion of Archeological Inference’, American Anthropologist, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 613–629 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/680338
[67]
B. d’Agostino, ‘The Italian perspective on theoretical archaeology’, in Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades, vol. Material cultures, London: Routledge, 1991, pp. 52–64.
[68]
K. Kotsakis, ‘The powerful past: theoretical trends in Greek archaeology’, in Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades, vol. Material cultures, London: Routledge, 1991, pp. 65–90 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a58826a0-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[69]
Bérard, Claude, A city of images: iconography and society in ancient Greece. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989.
[70]
A. Schnapp, ‘Eros the Hunter’, in A city of images: iconography and society in ancient Greece, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989, pp. 71–87 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=b038aa25-6136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[71]
Bintliff, J. L., The Annales school and archaeology. London: Leicester University Press, 1991 [Online]. Available: https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/handle/1887/7980
[72]
Bietti Sestieri, Anna Maria, The iron age community of Osteria dell’Osa: a study of socio-political development in central Tyrrhenian Italy, vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
[73]
S. Cleuziou, A. Coudart, J.-P. Demoule, and A. Schnapp, ‘The use of Theory in French Archaeology’, in Archaeological theory in Europe: the last three decades, vol. Material cultures, London: Routledge, 1991, pp. 91–128.
[74]
M. Cuozzo, ‘Patterns of Organisation and Funerary Customs in the Cemetery of Pontecagnano (Salerno) During the Orientalising Period’, Journal of European Archaeology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 263–298, Sep. 1994, doi: 10.1179/096576694800719157.
[75]
M. A. Cuozzo, ‘Ancient Campania. Cultural interaction, political borders and geographical boundaries’, in Ancient Italy: regions without boundaries, Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2007, pp. 224–267 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=575d8078-0b08-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[76]
B. d’Agostino, ‘Military Organisation and social structure in Archaic Etruria’, in The Greek city: from Homer to Alexander, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991, pp. 59–82.
[77]
V. Izzet, ‘Etruria and the Etruscans. Recent approaches’, in Ancient Italy: regions without boundaries, Exeter: University of Exeter Press, 2007, pp. 114–130.
[78]
F. Lissarrague, ‘Epiktetos egraphsen: the Writing on the Cup’, in Art and text in ancient Greek culture, vol. Cambridge studies in new art history and criticism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 12–27 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=01b654c8-5a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[79]
Marchand, Suzanne L., Down from Olympus: archaeology and philhellenism in Germany, 1750-1970. Princeton, N.J: Princeton University Press, 1996.
[80]
N. Terrenato, ‘“Start the revolution without me”: recent debates in Italian Classical Archaeology’, in Papers in Italian archaeology VI: communities and settlements from the Neolithic to the early Medieval period : proceedings of the 6th Conference of Italian Archaeology held at the Univrsity of Groningen, Groningen Institute of Archaeology, the Netherlands, April 15-17, 2003, vol. BAR international series, Oxford: Archaeopress, 2005, pp. 39–43.
[81]
M.-A. Dobres and J. E. Robb, ‘Agency in archaeology: paradigm or platitude?’, in Agency in archaeology, London: Routledge, 2000, pp. 3–17 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=37d0cb62-5336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[82]
A. Gardner, ‘Agency’, in Handbook of archaeological theories, 2008, pp. 95–108 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780759113602
[83]
I. Morris, ‘The anthropology of a dead world’, in Death-ritual and social structure in classical antiquity, vol. Key themes in ancient history, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992, pp. 1–30 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c4ad4e7d-5a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[84]
R. Osborne, ‘W(h)ither Orientalization?’, in Debating orientalization: multidisciplinary approaches to processes of change in the ancient Mediterranean, vol. Monographs in Mediterranean archaeology, London: Equinox, 2006, pp. 153–158 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ff782124-8636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[85]
W. H. Sewell, ‘The Concept(s) of Culture’, in Logics of history: social theory and social transformation, vol. Chicago studies in practices of meaning, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005, pp. 152–174.
[86]
M. Shanks and C. Tilley, ‘The individual and the social’, in Social theory and archaeology, Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell, 1987, pp. 61–78 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=07ba3ee9-6636-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[87]
Gardner, Andrew, An archaeology of identity: soldiers and society in late Roman Britain, vol. Publications of the Institute of Archaeology, University College London. Walnut Creek, Calif: Left Coast Press, 2007.
[88]
A. Gell, ‘The problem defined’, in Art and agency: an anthropological theory, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998, pp. 1–11 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f6621786-4e67-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[89]
J. Tanner, ‘Culture, social structure and artistic agency in Classical Greece’, in The invention of art history in Ancient Greece: religion, society and artistic rationalisation, vol. Cambridge classical studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006, pp. 141–204 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f7d2a9ba-5c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[90]
J. Barrett, ‘Agency, the duality of structure and the problem of the archaeological record’, in Archaeological theory today, Cambridge: Polity, 2001, pp. 141–164 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=1101335&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EK&ppid=Page-__-76
[91]
P. Bourdieu, ‘The Berber house or the world reversed’, in Rules and meanings: the anthropology of everyday knowledge : selected readings, vol. Penguin modern sociology readings, Harmondsworth: Penguin Education, 1973, pp. 98–110 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f96314a8-155a-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[92]
Bourdieu, Pierre and Nice, Richard, Outline of a theory of practice, vol. Cambridge studies in social anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.
[93]
M. Dietler and I. Herbich, ‘Habitus, techniques, style: an integrated approach to the social understanding of material culture and boundaries’, in The archaeology of social boundaries, vol. Smithsonian series in archaeological inquiry, Washington [D.C.]: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1998, pp. 232–263 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=01d474eb-7d36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[94]
Giddens, Anthony, The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1986 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ucl/detail.action?docID=1221197
[95]
P. van Dommelen, ‘Punic persistence: colonialism and cultural identity in Roman Sardinia’, in Cultural identity in the Roman Empire, London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 25–48 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=407c43b5-5236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[96]
L. Meskell, ‘Archaeologies of identity’, in Archaeological theory today, Cambridge: Polity, 2001, pp. 187–213 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a382cfcd-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[97]
J. M. Hall, ‘Ethnic Identity in Greek Antiquity’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 8, no. 02, pp. 265–283, 1998, doi: 10.1017/S0959774300001864.
[98]
J. Vives-Ferrándiz Sánchez, ‘Colonial encounters and the negotiation of identities in south-east Iberia’, in Mediterranean crossroads, Athens: Pierides Foundation, 2007, pp. 537–562.
[99]
Peter van Dommelen, ‘Colonial Constructs: Colonialism and Archaeology in the Mediterranean’, World Archaeology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 305–323 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/125021
[100]
C. Antonaccio, ‘Ethnicity and Colonization’, in Ancient perceptions of Greek ethnicity, vol. Center for Hellenic Studies colloquia, Washington, D.C.: Center for Hellenic Studies, Trustees for Harvard University, 2001, pp. 113–157.
[101]
M. Diaz-Andreu and S. Lucy, ‘Introduction’, in The archaeology of identity: approaches to gender, age, status, ethnicity and religion, London: Routledge, 2005, pp. 1–13 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=b25f4f45-5336-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[102]
C. Morgan, ‘Ethnicity and early Greek states: historical and material perspectives’, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society, vol. 37, pp. 131–163, Jan. 1992, doi: 10.1017/S0068673500001565.
[103]
M. Given, ‘Inventing the Eteocypriots: Imperialist Archaeology and the Manipulation of Ethnic Identity’, Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 3–29, Aug. 1998, doi: 10.1558/jmea.v11i1.3.
[104]
M. Fotiadis, ‘Cultural identity and regional archaeological projects’, Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 4, no. 01, pp. 102–113, May 1997, doi: 10.1017/S1380203800000933.
[105]
R. Hingley, ‘Cultural Diversity and Unity: empire and Rome’, in Material culture and social identities in the ancient world, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 54–75 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=4073012d-5c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[106]
S. Jones, ‘Discourses of identity in the interpretation of the past’, in Cultural identity and archaeology: the construction of European communities, vol. Theoretical Archaeology Group (TAG), London: Routledge, 1996, pp. 62–80 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=8c7bba35-5236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[107]
I. Malkin, ‘Postcolonial Concepts and Ancient Greek Colonization’, MLQ: Modern Language Quarterly, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 341–364, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/modern_language_quarterly/v065/65.3malkin.html
[108]
Hall, Jonathan M., Hellenicity: between ethnicity and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2002.
[109]
P. van Dommelen, ‘Cultural imaginings. Punic tradition and local identity in Roman Republican Sardinia’, in Italy and the west: comparative issues in Romanization, Oxford: Oxbow, 2001, pp. 68–84 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=cdd86dae-8136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[110]
Woolf, Greg and C. Gosden, ‘Beyond Romans and natives.’, World Archaeology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 339–350, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/125023
[111]
G. Woolf, Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511518614
[112]
T. Yates, ‘Frameworks for an archaeology of the body’, in Interpretative archaeology, vol. Explorations in anthropology, Oxford, UK: Berg, 1992, pp. 31–72 [Online]. Available: https://www.bloomsburycollections.com/book/interpretative-archaeology/
[113]
V. Izzet, ‘Holding a mirror to Etruscan gender’, in Gender and Italian archaeology: challenging the stereotypes, vol. Accordia specialist studies on Italy, London: Accordia Research Institute, 1998, pp. 209–227 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ec69728f-8e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[114]
L. Meskell, ‘Archaeologies of identity’, in Archaeological theory today, Cambridge: Polity, 2001, pp. 187–213 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e0a1019e-0a08-e811-80cd-005056af4099
[115]
Johnson, Matthew, Archaeological theory: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.
[116]
M. W. Conkey and J. M. Gero, ‘Programme to practice: Gender and Feminism in Archaeology’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 411–437, 1997, doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.26.1.411.
[117]
Tarlow, Sarah, Hamilakis, Yannis, and Pluciennik, Mark, Thinking through the body: archaeologies of corporeality. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2002.
[118]
A. B. Knapp and L. Meskell, ‘Bodies of Evidence on Prehistoric Cyprus’, Cambridge Archaeological Journal, vol. 7, no. 02, pp. 183–204, 1997, doi: 10.1017/S0959774300001931.
[119]
L. Meskell, ‘The somatization of archaeology: Institutions, discourses, corporeality’, Norwegian Archaeological Review, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 1996, doi: 10.1080/00293652.1996.9965595.
[120]
Meskell, Lynn, Archaeologies of social life: age, sex, class et cetera in ancient Egypt, vol. Social archaeology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999.
[121]
I. Morris, ‘Archaeology and gender ideologies in early Archaic Greece’, in Sex and difference in ancient Greece and Rome, vol. Edinburgh readings on the ancient world, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2003, pp. 264–275 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=67759abe-6836-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[122]
Nevett, Lisa C., House and society in the ancient Greek world, vol. New studies in archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
[123]
R. Osborne, ‘Looking on Greek style: does the sculpted girl speak to women too’, in Classical Greece: ancient histories and modern archaeologies, vol. New directions in archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994, pp. 81–96.
[124]
Rautman, Alison E. and Gender and Archaeology Conference, Reading the body: representations and remains in the archaeological record, vol. Regendering the past. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2000.
[125]
J. R. Sofaer, The Body as Material Culture: a Theoretical Osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511816666
[126]
A. Stewart, ‘Reflections’, in Sexuality in ancient art: Near East, Egypt, Greece and Italy, vol. Cambridge studies in new art history and criticsm, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 136–154 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=d0bd0a7c-5b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[127]
H. Moore, ‘Bodies on the move: gender, power and material culture’, in A passion for difference: essays in anthropology and gender, Cambridge: Polity, 1994, pp. 71–85 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=ed370090-6736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[128]
M. Mauss, ‘Body Techniques’, in Sociology and psychology: essays, London [etc.]: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1979, pp. 95–123 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=7d8e026e-6236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[129]
Jonathan Friedman, ‘The Past in the Future: History and the Politics of Identity’, American Anthropologist, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 837–859 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/680224
[130]
M. Rowlands, ‘The politics of identity in archaeology’, in Social construction of the past: representation as power, vol. One world archaeology, London: Routledge, 1994, pp. 129–143 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=5aacb0fb-5136-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[131]
Y. Hamilakis and E. Yalouri, ‘Antiquities as symbolic capital in modern Greek society’, Antiquity, vol. 70, no. 267, pp. 117–129, Mar. 1996, doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00082934.
[132]
L. Meskell (ed.), Archaeology Under Fire: Nationalism, Politics and Heritage in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East. Routledge, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780203029817
[133]
M. Díaz-Andreu, Nationalism and Archaeology in Europe. Routledge, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781315748221
[134]
Michael Dietler, ‘“Our Ancestors the Gauls”: Archaeology, Ethnic Nationalism, and the Manipulation of Celtic Identity in Modern Europe’, American Anthropologist, vol. 96, no. 3, pp. 584–605 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/682302
[135]
Michael Fotiadis, ‘Modernity and the Past-Still-Present: Politics of Time in the Birth of Regional Archaeological Projects in Greece’, American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 59–78 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/506879
[136]
Y. Hamilakis, ‘Decolonizing Greek archaeology: indigenous archaeologies, modernist archaeology and the post-colonial critique’, in A singular antiquity: archaeology and Hellenic identity in twentieth-century Greece, vol. Mouseio Benaki, Athens: Benaki Museum, 2008, pp. 273–284 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e15c9e59-4d67-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[137]
Hamilakis, Yannis, The nation and its ruins: antiquity, archaeology, and national imagination in Greece, vol. Classical presences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[138]
Y. Hamilakis, ‘Museums of oblivion’, Antiquity, vol. 85, no. 328, pp. 625–629, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00068010.
[139]
Y. Hamilakis, ‘Are We Postcolonial Yet? Tales from the Battlefield’, Archaeologies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 67–76, 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11759-012-9200-5.
[140]
E. Hobsbawm and T. Ranger, Eds., The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9781107295636
[141]
D. Lowenthal, The Heritage Crusade and the Spoils of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511523809
[142]
Lynn Meskell, ‘The Intersections of Identity and Politics in Archaeology’, Annual Review of Anthropology, vol. 31, pp. 279–301, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4132881
[143]
P. Odermatt, ‘Built heritage and the politics of (re) presentation’, Archaeological Dialogues, vol. 3, no. 02, pp. 95–119, 1996, doi: 10.1017/S1380203800000660.
[144]
Pierre Nora, ‘Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire’, Representations, no. 26, pp. 7–24 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2928520
[145]
Yiannis Papadakis, ‘Greek Cypriot Narratives of History and Collective Identity: Nationalism as a Contested Process’, American Ethnologist, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 149–165 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/646690
[146]
Paul Sant Cassia, ‘Tradition, Tourism and Memory in Malta’, The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 247–263 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2660696
[147]
Yalouri, Eleana, The Acropolis: global fame, local claim, vol. Materializing culture. Oxford: Berg, 2001.
[148]
E. Banning, ‘Research design and sampling’, in The archaeologist’s laboratory: the analysis of archaeological data, vol. Interdisciplinary contributions to archaeology, New York: London, 2000, pp. 73–92 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=cfa3440e-4e67-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[149]
L. R. Binford, ‘A Consideration of Archaeological Research Design’, American Antiquity, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 425–441, 1964 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/277978
[150]
P. W. Blinkhorn and C. G. Cumberpatch, ‘The Interpretation of Artefacts and the Tyranny of the Field Archaeologist’, Assemblage: the Sheffield graduate journal of archaeology, vol. 4 [Online]. Available: https://assemblagejournal.files.wordpress.com/2017/05/blinkhorn-and-cumberpatch-1998-the-interpretation-of-artefacts-and-the-tyranny-of-the-field-archaeologist.pdf
[151]
L. Bowkett, S. Hill, D. Wardle, and K. A. Wardle, ‘Introduction’, in Classical archaeology in the field: approaches, vol. Classical world series, London: Bristol Classical Press, 2001, pp. 1–10.
[152]
L. Bowkett, S. Hill, D. Wardle, and K. A. Wardle, ‘The development of Classical Archaeology’, in Classical archaeology in the field: approaches, vol. Classical world series, London: Bristol Classical Press, 2001, pp. 11–25 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=87753895-8936-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[153]
G. Andrews and English Heritage, Management of archaeological projects. London: English Heritage, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue5/westhes/map2index.htm
[154]
Flannery, Kent V., The early Mesoamerican village, vol. Studies in archeology. New York: Academic Press, 1976.
[155]
F. A. Hassan, ‘Beyond the surface: comments on Hodder’s “reflexive excavation methodology”’, Antiquity, vol. 71, no. 274, pp. 1020–1025, Dec. 1997, doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00085938.
[156]
I. Hodder, ‘“Always momentary, fluid and flexible”: towards a reflexive excavation methodology’, Antiquity, vol. 71, no. 273, pp. 691–700, Sep. 1997, doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00085410.
[157]
I. Hodder, ‘Whose rationality? A response to Fekri Hassan’, Antiquity, vol. 72, no. 275, pp. 213–217, Mar. 1998, doi: 10.1017/S0003598X00086439.
[158]
G. Milne, ‘The archaeologist as alchemist’, in From Roman basilica to medieval market: archaeology in action in the city of London, London: HMSO, 1992, pp. 51–59 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=c3113bbe-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[159]
S. Payne, ‘Partial recovery and sample bias: The results of some sieving experiments’, in Papers in economic prehistory: studies by members and associates of the British Academy Major Research Project in the Early History of Agriculture, London: Cambridge University Press, 1972, pp. 49–64 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=41494f18-5936-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[160]
C. L. Redman, ‘Multistage Fieldwork and Analytical Techniques’, American Antiquity, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 61–79 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/279311
[161]
C. L. Redman, ‘Surface Collection, Sampling, and Research Design: A Retrospective’, American Antiquity, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 249–265 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/281779
[162]
W. Raymond Wood and Donald Lee Johnson, ‘A Survey of Disturbance Processes in Archaeological Site Formation’, Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, vol. 1, pp. 315–381, 1978 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20170136
[163]
Lewis R. Binford, ‘Behavioral Archaeology and the “Pompeii Premise”’, Journal of Anthropological Research, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 195–208, 1981 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3629723
[164]
S. E. Bon, ‘A city frozen in time or a site in perpetual motion? Formation processes at Pompeii’, in Sequence and space in Pompeii, vol. Oxbow monograph, Oxford: Oxbow Books, 1997, pp. 7–12 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=123f78cd-8f36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[165]
R. Bradley and M. Fulford, ‘Sherd size in the analysis of occupation debris’, Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology, vol. 17, pp. 85–94, 1980 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=de9090bc-4a36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[166]
F. J. Green and K. Lockyear, ‘Seeds, sherds and samples: site formation processes at the Waitrose site, Romsey’, in Whither environmental archaeology?, vol. Oxbow monograph, Oxbow, 1994, pp. 91–104 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=1f953589-7736-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[167]
P. Halstead, I. Hodder, and G. Jones, ‘Behavioural archaeology and refuse patterns: A case study’, Norwegian Archaeological Review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 118–131, 1978, doi: 10.1080/00293652.1978.9965308.
[168]
G. C. M. Jansen, ‘Systems for the disposal of waste and excreta in Roman cities. The situation in Pompeii, Herculaneum and Ostia’, in Sordes urbis: la eliminación de residuos en la ciudad romana : actas de la Reunión de Roma (15-16 de noviembre de 1996), vol. Bibliotheca Italica : monografías de la Escuela Española de Historia y Arqueología en Roma, Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2000, pp. 37–50.
[169]
W. Liebschuetz, ‘Rubbish disposal in Greek and Roman Cities’, in Sordes urbis: la eliminación de residuos en la ciudad romana : actas de la Reunión de Roma (15-16 de noviembre de 1996), vol. Bibliotheca Italica : monografías de la Escuela Española de Historia y Arqueología en Roma, Roma: L’Erma di Bretschneider, 2000, pp. 51–62.
[170]
C. R. Orton, ‘Two useful parameters for pottery research’, in Computer applications in archaeology 1985: proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Methods, Institute of Archaeology, London, March 29-30, 1985, London: University of London, Institute of Archaeology, 1986, pp. 114–120 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=2f76d612-1c46-e711-80cb-005056af4099
[171]
J. T. Peña, Roman Pottery in the Archaeological Record. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/9780511499685/type/book
[172]
M. B. Schiffer, ‘Archaeological Context and Systemic Context’, American Antiquity, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 156–165, 1972 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/278203
[173]
Schiffer, Michael B., Formation processes of the archaeological record. Albuquerque, N.M.: University of New Mexico Press, 1987 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=ip,shib&db=nlebk&AN=10467&site=ehost-live&scope=site&ebv=EB&ppid=pp_COVER
[174]
Peter E. Siegel and Peter G. Roe, ‘Shipibo Archaeo-Ethnography: Site Formation Processes and Archaeological Interpretation’, World Archaeology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 96–115, 1986 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/124664
[175]
Alan P. Sullivan, III, ‘The Technology of Ceramic Reuse: Formation Processes and Archaeological Evidence’, World Archaeology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 101–114, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/124487
[176]
P. M. Allison, ‘Artefact Assemblages: Not the Pompeii Premise’, in Papers of the fourth Conference of Italian archaeology, London: Accordia Research Centre, 1991, pp. 49–56 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=0b7c6260-8e36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[177]
H. E. M. Cool, ‘An overview of the small finds from Catterick’, in Cataractonium: Roman Catterick and its hinterland : excavations and research, 1958-1997, vol. Research report / Council for British Archaeology, York: Council for British Archaeology, 2002, pp. 24–43 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=a3e10cef-9036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[178]
H. E. M. Cool and M. J. Baxter, ‘Exploring Romano-British finds assemblages’, Oxford Journal of Archaeology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 365–380, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1468-0092.00168.
[179]
N. Crummy, ‘Six honest serving men: a basic methodology for the study of small finds conference held at the Univeristy of Durham’, in Roman finds: context and theory : proceedings of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham, Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2007, pp. 59–66 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kw29ff
[180]
B. Hayden and A. Cannon, ‘Where the garbage goes: Refuse disposal in the Maya Highlands’, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 117–163, 1983, doi: 10.1016/0278-4165(83)90010-7.
[181]
K. Lockyear, ‘Site Finds in Roman Britain: A Comparison of Techniques’, Oxford Journal of Archaeology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 397–423, 2000, doi: 10.1111/1468-0092.00118.
[182]
Lockyear, Kris, Patterns and process in late Roman Republican coin hoards, 157-2 BC, vol. BAR international series. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2007.
[183]
G. Lucas, ‘Splitting objects’, in Critical approaches to fieldwork : contemporary and historical archaeological practice / Gavin Lucas., pp. 64–106 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203132258
[184]
M. Millett, ‘Experiments in the analysis of finds deposition at Shiptonthorpe: a retrospect’, in Roman finds: context and theory : proceedings of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham, Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2007, pp. 100–105 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kw29ff
[185]
C. Orton and M. Hughes, Pottery in Archaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://ebooks.cambridge.org/ref/id/CBO9780511920066
[186]
R. Reece, ‘The interpretation of site finds — a review’, in Coin finds and coin use in the Roman world: the thirteenth Oxford Symposium on Coinage and Monetary History, 25.-27.3.1993 : a NATO advanced research workshop, vol. Studien zu Fundmünzen der Antike, Berlin: Gebr. Mann Verlag, 1996, pp. 341–355.
[187]
P. Tyers, ‘Sources for the study of Roman pottery’, in Roman pottery in Britain, London: Batsford, 1996, pp. 24–35 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f9cfe4ff-6236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[188]
P. M. Allison, ‘Artefact distribution and spatial function in Pompeian houses’, in The Roman family in Italy: status, sentiment, space, vol. OUP/HRC, Canberra: Humanities Research Centre, 1997, pp. 321–354 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=79e1dcd6-4c36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[189]
P. M. Allison, ‘Introduction’, in The archaeology of household activities / edited by Penelope M. Allison., pp. 1–18 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203014929
[190]
P. M. Allison, ‘Labels for Ladles: Interpreting the material culture of Roman Householdsby Penelope M. Allison.’, in The archaeology of household activities / edited by Penelope M. Allison., pp. 57–77 [Online]. Available: http://www.vlebooks.com/vleweb/product/openreader?id=UCL&isbn=9780203014929
[191]
K. V. Flannery, ‘Analysis on the household level/The Early Mesoamerican House’, in The early Mesoamerican village, vol. Studies in archeology, New York: Academic Press, 1976, pp. 13–24.
[192]
A. Gardner, ‘Artefacts, contexts, and the archaeology of social practicess of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham’, in Roman finds: context and theory : proceedings of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham, Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2007, pp. 128–139 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kw29ff
[193]
M. Grahame, ‘Public and private in the Roman house: the spatial order of the Casa del Fauno’, in Roman finds: context and theory : proceedings of a conference held at the Univeristy of Durham, Oxford: Oxbow Books, 2007, pp. 137–164 [Online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1kw29ff
[194]
Grahame, Mark, Reading space: social interaction and identity in the houses of Roman Pompeii : a syntactical approach to the analysis and interpretation of built space, vol. BAR international series. Oxford: Archaeopress, 2000.
[195]
V. M. LaMotta and M. B. Schiffer, ‘The formation processes of house floor assemblages’, in The archaeology of household activities / edited by Penelope M. Allison., pp. 19–29 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/readonline/9780203014929/startPage/16/1
[196]
Laurence, Ray, Roman Pompeii: space and society. London: Routledge, 1994.
[197]
Wallace-Hadrill, Andrew, Houses and society in Pompeii and Herculaneum. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1994.
[198]
Barker, Graeme, Hodges, Richard, and Clark, Gillian, A Mediterranean valley: landscape archaeology and Annales History in the Biferno Valley. London: Leicester University Press, 1995.
[199]
Barker, Graeme, Mattingly, D. J., and Unesco Libyan Valleys Archaeological Survey, Farming the desert: the UNESCO Libyan Valleys Archaeological Survey. Paris: UNESCO, 1996.
[200]
Barker, Graeme, Lloyd, John, British School at Rome, Ecole française de Rome, Instituto Español de Historia y Arqueología, and Struttura agricola romana: il contributo della ricognizione archeologica: Conference, Roman landscapes: archaeological survey in the Mediterranean region, vol. Archaeological monographs of the British School at Rome. London: British School at Rome, 1991.
[201]
M. Belcher, A. Harrison, and S. Stoddart, ‘Analyzing Rome’s hinterland’, in Geographical information systems and landscape archaeology, vol. The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes, Oxford: Oxbow, 1999, pp. 95–101.
[202]
Flannery, Kent V., The early Mesoamerican village, vol. Studies in archeology. New York: Academic Press, 1976.
[203]
K. V. Flannery, ‘Sampling on the Regional Level’, in The early Mesoamerican village, vol. Studies in archeology, New York: Academic Press, 1976, pp. 131–160 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=76158fd1-4b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[204]
J. W. Hayes, ‘The current state of Roman ceramic studies in Mediterranean survey, or handling pottery from surveys’, in Extracting meaning from ploughsoil assemblages, vol. The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes, Oxford: Oxbow, 2000, pp. 105–109.
[205]
G. Lock, T. Bell, and J. Lloyd, ‘Towards a methodology for modeling surface survey data: the Sangro Valley Project’, in Geographical information systems and landscape archaeology, vol. The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes, Oxford: Oxbow, 1999, pp. 55–63 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=59347803-9036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[206]
D. Mattingly, ‘Methods of collection, recording and quantification’, in Extracting meaning from ploughsoil assemblages, vol. The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes, Oxford: Oxbow, 2000, pp. 5–15 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d1f3d1f6-075a-e911-80cd-005056af4099
[207]
D. Mattingly and R. Witcher, ‘Mapping the Roman world: the contribution of field survey data’, in Side-by-side survey: comparative regional studies in the Mediterranean World, Oxford: Oxbow, 2004, pp. 173–188 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=f3d0a902-8236-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[208]
M. Millett, ‘Dating, quantifying and utilizing pottery assemblages from surface survey’, in Extracting meaning from ploughsoil assemblages, vol. The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes, Oxford: Oxbow, 2000, pp. 53–59.
[209]
C. R. Orton, ‘Covering the ground’, in Sampling in archaeology, vol. Cambridge manuals in archaeology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000, pp. 67–111 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=455f02ab-5b36-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[210]
N. Terrenato, ‘The visibility of sites and the interpretation of field survey results: towards an analysis of incomplete distributions’, in Extracting meaning from ploughsoil assemblages, vol. The archaeology of Mediterranean landscapes, Oxford: Oxbow, 2000, pp. 60–71 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk//secure/link?id=cb022a17-9036-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[211]
N. Terrenato, ‘"Sample size matters! The paradox of global trends and local surveys’, in Side-by-side survey: comparative regional studies in the Mediterranean World, Oxford: Oxbow, 2004, pp. 36–48.
