Bibliography for LAWS3006: Law of Evidence

‘A and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2) - [2006] 1 All ER 575’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4J84-TMG0-TWP1-61D2&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Adverse Inference’. Criminal Law Review (1999): n. pag. Print.

‘A-G’s Reference (No 1 of 2004), R v Edwards [2004] EWCA Crim 1025, [2005] 4 All ER 457’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?lexisReco=true&A=0.8295584090903456&bct=A&service=citation&linkInfo=C%23GB%23EWCACRIM%23PAGE%251025%25YEAR%252004%25&langcountry=GB&ersKey=23_T21053213177&backKey=null&recommendsType=LexisRecoCitationSuggestions&lexisReco=true>.

‘---’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?lexisReco=true&A=0.8295584090903456&bct=A&service=citation&linkInfo=C%23GB%23EWCACRIM%23PAGE%251025%25YEAR%252004%25&langcountry=GB&ersKey=23_T21053213177&backKey=null&recommendsType=LexisRecoCitationSuggestions&lexisReco=true>.

‘ALFRED CROMPTON AMUSEMENT MACHINES LTD. APPELLANTS AND CUSTOMS AND EXCISE COMMISSIONERS (No. 2) RESPONDENTS - [1974] A.C. 405’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD40-TXD8-6168&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

Andrew Roberts. ‘The Problem of Mistaken Identification: Some Observations on Process’. International Journal of Evidence & Proof (2004): n. pag. Print.

Ashworth, Andrew, and Mike Redmayne. The Criminal Process. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

---. The Criminal Process. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

‘Attorney General’s Reference (No 3 of 1999) - [2001] 1 All ER 577’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J70-TWP1-61J5&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Balabel and Another v Air-India - [1988] 2 All ER 246’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49D0-TWP1-61NN&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Barclays Bank Plc and Others v Eustice and Others - [1995] 4 All ER 511’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-618B&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Barnes v Chief Constable of Durham’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008480967&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008480969&backKey=20_T21008480970&csi=316617&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘Barnfather v Islington Education Authority [2003] EWHC 418 (Admin), [2003] 1 WLR 2318’. Court: Divisional Court. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/casessubmitForm.do>.

‘Blackburn, R. v [2005] EWCA Crim 1349 (25 May 2005)’. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2005/1349.html>.

‘BRATTY APPELLANT; AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR NORTHERN IRELAND RESPONDENT. - [1963] A.C. 386’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD40-TXD8-6199&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘BRENNAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 39846/98 [2001] ECHR 596 (16 October 2001)’. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2001/596.html>.

‘Brown v Stott (Procurator Fiscal, Dunfermline) and Another - [2001] 2 All ER 97’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-6129&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘BUTLER v. BOARD OF TRADE [1970 B. No. 1479] - [1971] Ch. 680’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-6CY0-TXD6-Y17B&csi=296988&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Butler v Board of Trade [1971] Ch 680, [1970] 3 All ER 593’. Court: Chancery Division. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21040153841&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21040153843&backKey=20_T21040153844&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008213565&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008213567&backKey=20_T21008213568&csi=316762&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=228>.

‘CALCRAFT v. GUEST. - [1898] 1 Q.B. 759’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4F-RWM0-TXD5-X1CM&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘CASE OF AL-KHAWAJA AND TAHERY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (Applications Nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06)’. Web. <http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-108072#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-108072%22]}>.

‘Chinn, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 501 (15 March 2012)’. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2012/501.html>.

Choo, Andrew L.-T. Evidence. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Print.

Christina McAlhone. Core Statutes on Evidence. Fifth Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Web. <http://copac.jisc.ac.uk/id/7370507?style=html&title=Core%20statutes%20on%20evidence>.

Claire McGourlay. Evidence Statutes 2012-2013. London: Routledge, 2013. Web. <http://copac.ac.uk/search?title=Evidence%20Statutes%202012-2013&rn=2>.

‘CPS v F (Rev 2) [2011] EWCA Crim 1844 (21 July 2011)’. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2011/1844.html>.

‘Criminal Justice Act 2003 (2003 c 44)’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61N0-TWPY-Y1DV&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2001/16/section/82>.

‘Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/25/contents>.

‘Daley v R - [1993] 4 All ER 86’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-61JR&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

David Ormerod and Diane Birch. ‘The Evolution of the Discretionary Exclusion of Evidence’. Criminal Law Review (2004): n. pag. Print.

---. ‘The Evolution of the Discretionary Exclusion of Evidence’. Criminal Law Review (2004): n. pag. Print.

Dennis, I. H. The Law of Evidence. 5th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013. Print.

---. The Law of Evidence. 5th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013. Print.

---. The Law of Evidence. 5th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013. Print.

---. The Law of Evidence. 5th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013. Print.

---. The Law of Evidence. 5th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013. Print.

---. The Law of Evidence. 5th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013. Print.

---. The Law of Evidence. 5th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013. Print.

---. The Law of Evidence. 5th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013. Print.

---. The Law of Evidence. 5th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013. Print.

---. The Law of Evidence. 5th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013. Print.

---. The Law of Evidence. 5th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013. Print.

---. The Law of Evidence. 5th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2013. Print.

Devlin, Patrick. The Judge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1979. Print.

‘Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown Prosecution Service CCU South West) v Wright; R (on the Application of Scott and Others v Taunton Deane Magistrates’ Court’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhnonsearch.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21040708707&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21040708708&backKey=20_T21040708709&bct=A&csi=316762&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘Director of Public Prosecutions v Kilbourne - [1973] 1 All ER 440’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KP0-TWP1-60P5&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Director of Public Prosecutions v Wright; R (on the Application of Scott and Others) v Taunton Deane Magistrates’ Court - [2009] 3 All ER 726’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7WB6-C160-Y96Y-G26S&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

Duff, Antony. The Trial on Trial. Oxford: Hart, 2004. Print.

---. The Trial on Trial. Oxford: Hart, 2004. Print.

Duff, R. A. ‘Strict Liability, Legal Presumptions, and the Presumption of Innocence’. Appraising Strict Liability. Ed. Andrew Simester. Oxford University Press, 2005. 125–150. Web. <http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278510.001.0001/acprof-9780199278510-chapter-6>.

Dworkin. ‘Principle, Policy, Procedure’. Crime, Proof and Punishment: Essays in Memory of Sir Rupert Cross. London: Butterworths, 1981. Print.

‘European Convention on Human Rights and Its Five Protocols’. Web. <http://www.hri.org/docs/ECHR50.html>.

‘Evidence - Whether a Suggested Motive for Making a False Allegation Is a Fact for the Purposes of Section 34’. Criminal Law Review (2000): n. pag. Print.

‘Francis & Francis (a Firm) v Central Criminal Court - [1988] 3 All ER 775’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49G0-TWP1-60D2&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Funke v France (Application 10828/84) [1993] 1 CMLR 897, 16 EHRR 297’. Court: European Court of Human Rights. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/homesubmitForm.do>.

‘Gafgen v Germany (Application 22978/05) (2010) 52 EHRR 1, [2010] Crim LR 865’. Court: European Court of Human Rights. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21026147269&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T21026162818&backKey=20_T21026162819&csi=279841&docNo=3&scrollToPosition=228>.

‘---’. Court: European Court of Human Rights. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21026497279&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21026497281&backKey=20_T21026497282&csi=279841&docNo=3&scrollToPosition=228>.

‘General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corpn Ltd v Tanter, The Zephyr [1984] 1 All ER 35, [1984] 1 WLR 100’. Court: Queen’s Bench Division. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21040226521&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T21040230412&backKey=20_T21040230413&csi=279841&docNo=3&hitNo=ORIGHIT_1&scrollToPosition=570>.

‘Goddard and Another v Nationwide Building Society - [1986] 3 All ER 264’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KV0-TWP1-60P5&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Grant v R [2005] EWCA Crim 1089’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhnonsearch.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21026905936&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21026905937&backKey=20_T21026905938&bct=A&csi=274662&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=222>.

‘Great Atlantic Insurance Co v Home Insurance Co and Others - [1981] 2 All ER 485’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KV0-TWP1-60T9&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Guinness Peat Properties Ltd and Others v Fitzroy Robinson Partnership (a Firm) - [1987] 2 All ER 716’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49F0-TWP1-60FC&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Harmony Shipping Co SA v Davis and Others - [1979] 3 All ER 177’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KT0-TWP1-612D&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Heaney and McGuinness v Ireland (Application No 34720/97) (2000) 33 EHRR 264, [2000] ECHR 34720/97’. Court: European Court of Human Rights. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20987345757&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20987345759&backKey=20_T20987345760&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘Her Majesty’s Advocate v P (Scotland)’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21026512848&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21026512850&backKey=20_T21026512851&csi=316762&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

Ho, Hock Lai. ‘State Entrapment’. Legal Studies 31.1 (2011): 71–95. Web.

‘Hollingham v Head (1858) 4 CBNS 388, 27 LJCP 241’. Court: English court pre-dating November1874 n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20980279300&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T20980292983&backKey=20_T20980292984&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘Homicide Act 1957’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/5-6/11/section/1>.

‘Human Rights Act 1998’. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents>.

‘Human Rights: Right to Respect for Private Life Khan v United Kingdom (35394/97) (2001) 31 E.H.R.R. 45 (ECHR)’. Criminal Law Review (2000): n. pag. Print.

Huxley, Phil. Blackstone’s Statutes on Evidence. 13th ed. Blackstone’s statutes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Print.

‘Istil Group Inc and Another v Zahoor and Another - [2003] 2 All ER 252’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J90-TWP1-6017&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘ITC Film Distributors v Video Exchange Ltd and Others - [1982] 2 All ER 241’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KT0-TWP1-60PM&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Jalloh v Germany (Application 54810/00) (2006) 44 EHRR 667, [2007] Crim LR 717’. Court: European Court of Human Rights. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20987323214&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20987323216&backKey=20_T20987323217&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=114>.

J.D. Jackson. ‘The Insufficiency of Identification Evidence Based on Personal Impression’. Criminal Law Review (1986): n. pag. Print.

‘Jones v University of Warwick - [2003] 3 All ER 760’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-610V&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘JUNIOR REID APPELLANT AND THE QUEEN RESPONDENT ROY DENNIS APPELLANT AND THE QUEEN RESPONDENT OLIVER WHYLIE APPELLANT AND THE QUEEN RESPONDENT ERROL REECE AND OTHERS APPELLANTS AND THE QUEEN RESPONDENT [APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF JAMAICA] - [1990] 1 A.C. 363’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WR0-TXD8-61P8&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Khan v United Kingdom (Application 35394/97) (2000) 31 EHRR 45, 8 BHRC 310’. Court: European Court of Human Rights. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20986573662&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20986573665&backKey=20_T20986573666&csi=279841&docNo=8&scrollToPosition=1482>.

‘KURUMA, SON OF KANIU APPELLANT; AND THE QUEEN RESPONDENT. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR EASTERN AFRICA. - [1955] A.C. 197’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD30-TXD8-613J&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

Lon L. Fuller and Kenneth I. Winston. ‘The Forms and Limits of Adjudication’. Harvard Law Review 92.2 (1978): 353–409. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/1340368>.

‘Lord Ashburton v Pape - [1911-13] All ER Rep 708’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FPP-FDK0-TWXJ-20YW&csi=279846&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘M`Naghten`s Case (1843) 10 Cl. & Fin. 200’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/docview/attachRetrieve.do?csi=338869&A=0.17910976543836576&ersKey=23_T21040640278&urlEnc=ISO-8859-1&inline=y&smi=60414&componentseq=1&key=7YV4-G0V0-YC0H-X35H-00000-00&type=pdf&displayType=full_pdf&lni=7YV4-G0V0-YC0H-X35H&docTitle=Daniel%20M|Naghten|s%20Case%20-%20(1843)%208%20ER%20718>.

‘Minet v Morgan (1873) 8 Ch App 361, 42 LJ Ch 627’. Court: English court pre-dating November1874. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/casessubmitForm.do>.

‘Mohammad, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1871 (12 June 2009)’. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2009/1871.html>.

Munday, R. J. C. Evidence. Seventh edition. Core text series. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2013. Print.

‘Murray v United Kingdom (Application 18731/91) (1996) 22 EHRR 29, (1996) Times, 9 February’. Court: European Court of Human Rights. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20987277155&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20987277157&backKey=20_T20987277158&csi=279841&docNo=17&scrollToPosition=3420>.

‘O, R v [2005] EWCA Crim 3082 (2 November 2005)’. Web. <http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2005/3082.html>.

‘O’Halloran and Francis v United Kingdom (App Nos 15809/02 and 25624/02) - [2007] ECHR 15809/02’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4P3V-80X0-TWP1-G1DB&csi=274793&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Parkes v R [1976] 3 All ER 380, [1976] 1 WLR 1251’. Court: Privy Council. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/returnTo.do?returnToKey=20_T20987485970>.

‘PART 32 - EVIDENCE - Civil Procedure Rules’. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part32>.

‘Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984’. Web. <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/60/section/78>.

‘R (on the Application of Kelly) v Warley Magistrates Court and Another’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21040517053&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21040517055&backKey=20_T21040517056&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=114>.

‘R (on the Application of Prudential Plc and Another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and Another’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21027018113&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21027018117&backKey=20_T21027018119&csi=316762&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Acott [1997] 1 All ER 706, [1997] 1 WLR 306’. Court: House of Lords. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/casessubmitForm.do>.

‘R v Alladice (1988) 87 Cr App Rep 380, [1988] Crim LR 608’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/casessubmitForm.do>.

‘R v Argent’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20995071401&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T20995072699&backKey=20_T20995075000&csi=316617&docNo=2&hitNo=ORIGHIT_2&scrollToPosition=114>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20995071401&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T20995072699&backKey=20_T20995075000&csi=316617&docNo=2&hitNo=ORIGHIT_2&scrollToPosition=114>.

‘R v Aujla [1998] 2 Cr App Rep 16’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?lexisReco=true&A=0.9873944799276771&bct=A&service=citation&linkInfo=C%23GB%23CRAPPREP%23YEAR%251998%25VOL%252%25PAGE%2516%25&langcountry=GB&ersKey=23_T21026845671&backKey=null&recommendsType=LexisRecoCitationSuggestions&lexisReco=true>.

‘R v Beckles - [2005] 1 All ER 705’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FJF-DXM0-TWP1-61K1&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Bentley (1991) 99 Cr App Rep 342’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?lexisReco=true&A=0.021423386029904457&bct=A&service=citation&linkInfo=C%23GB%23CRAPPREP%23VOL%2599%25PAGE%25342%25&langcountry=GB&ersKey=23_T21025695448&backKey=null&recommendsType=LexisRecoCitationSuggestions&lexisReco=true>.

‘R v Betts [2001] EWCA Crim 224, [2001] 2 Cr App Rep 257’. Court: Court of Appeal n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?service=citator&csi=279841&remotekey2=%5B2001%5D+All+ER+%28D%29+108+%28Feb%29&remotekey1=REPORT-CITATION&ersKey=23_T20994647075&backKey=20_T20994647080&citatorCC=GB&docViewState=defaulte>.

‘R v Betts and Another - [2001] All ER (D) 108 (Feb)’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4SPK-6M40-TWP1-70XD&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Blastland - [1985] 2 All ER 1095’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49F0-TWP1-615T&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Canale [1990] 2 All ER 187, 91 Cr App Rep 1’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008243655&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008243657&backKey=20_T21008243658&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=114>.

‘R v Chalkley; R v Jeffries - [1998] 2 All ER 155’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60RP&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60RP&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Chargot Ltd (t/a Contract Services) and Others’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21053050782&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21053050784&backKey=20_T21053050785&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Christie [1914] AC 545, 10 Cr App Rep 141’. Court: House of Lords. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20978998189&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20978998191&backKey=20_T20978998192&csi=279841&docNo=23&scrollToPosition=3306>.

‘R v Collins; R v Keep [2004] EWCA Crim 33, [2004] 1 WLR 1705’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/homesubmitForm.do>.

‘R v Compton and Others - [2002] All ER (D) 149 (Dec)’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=55Y7-JTV1-DYBP-N08B&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Condron and Condron [1997] 1 WLR 827, [1997] 1 Cr App Rep 185’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20995052851&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20995052853&backKey=20_T20995052854&csi=279841&docNo=6&scrollToPosition=684>.

‘R v Crampton (1990) 92 Cr App Rep 369, [1991] Crim LR 277’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21007956791&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21007956793&backKey=20_T21007956794&csi=279841&docNo=6&scrollToPosition=798>.

‘R v Delaney (1988) 88 Cr App Rep 338, 153 JP 103’. Court: Court of Appeal n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008048352&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008048360&backKey=20_T21008048361&csi=279841&docNo=22&scrollToPosition=2622>.

‘R v Derby Magistrates’ Court, Ex Parte B; and Another Appeal - [1995] 4 All ER 526’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-61HH&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-61HH&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Fergus (1993) 98 Cr App Rep 313, 158 JP 49’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21025816914&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21025816916&backKey=20_T21025816917&csi=279841&docNo=8&scrollToPosition=1127>.

‘R v Folan’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008393644&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008393647&backKey=20_T21008393648&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=114>.

‘R v Forbes - [2001] 1 All ER 686’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J90-TWP1-602T&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Foster’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21007912817&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T21007926003&backKey=20_T21007926004&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Fulling [1987] QB 426, [1987] 2 All ER 65’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/homesubmitForm.do>.

‘R v G’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21053415028&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21053415030&backKey=20_T21053415031&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Galbraith - [1981] 2 All ER 1060’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KT0-TWP1-614Y&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v George [2002] EWCA Crim 1923, [2003] Crim LR 282’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/homesubmitForm.do>.

‘R v Gill - [1963] 2 All ER 688’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CRN-PP80-TWP1-61NW&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Goldenberg (1988) 88 Cr App Rep 285, 152 JP 557’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/homesubmitForm.do>.

‘*R v Grant - [2005] All ER (D) 44 (May)’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=55Y7-JVY1-DYBP-N226&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Greenwood - [2004] All ER (D) 17 (Jun)’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=55Y7-JW31-DYBP-N4RK&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Hasan - [2005] 4 All ER 685’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4HH7-PSG0-TWP1-60JW&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Hoare; R v Pierce’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20995114321&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20995114326&backKey=20_T20995114327&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Horncastle and Others (Appellants) (on Appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) - UKSC_2009_0073_Judgment.Pdf’. Web. <https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2009-0073-judgment.pdf>.

‘R v Hunt - [1987] 1 All ER 1’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4S32-G3C0-TWP1-61MM&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v I [2007] EWCA Crim 923, [2007] 2 Cr App Rep 316’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/returnTo.do?returnToKey=20_T21025781192>.

‘R v Johnstone - [2003] 3 All ER 884’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-7P90-TWP1-61K2&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-7P90-TWP1-61K2&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Keenan - [1989] 3 All ER 598’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49G0-TWP1-603Y&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Keenan [1990] 2 QB 54, [1989] 3 All ER 598’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/homesubmitForm.do>.

‘*R v Keogh - [2007] All ER (D) 105 (Mar)’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=55Y7-JST1-DYBP-N3G4&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Khan (Sultan) - [1996] 3 All ER 289’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J70-TWP1-61K0&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J70-TWP1-61K0&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J70-TWP1-61K0&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v King [1983] 1 All ER 929, [1983] 1 WLR 411’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/casessubmitForm.do>.

‘R v King’s Lynn Magistrates’ Court, Ex Parte Holland - [1993] 2 All ER 377’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-6085&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-6085&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-6085&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Lambert - [2001] 3 All ER 577’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4HV7-56D0-TWP1-60CD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4HV7-56D0-TWP1-60CD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4HV7-56D0-TWP1-60CD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4HV7-56D0-TWP1-60CD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4HV7-56D0-TWP1-60CD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Loizou’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20995133865&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20995133867&backKey=20_T20995133868&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Looseley, A-G’s Reference (No 3 of 2000) [2001] UKHL 53, [2001] 4 All ER 897’. Court: House of Lords. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21026826239&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21026826241&backKey=20_T21026826242&csi=279841&docNo=3&scrollToPosition=228>.

‘R v Looseley; Attorney General’s Reference (No 3 of 2000) - [2001] 4 All ER 897’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J90-TWP1-60F8&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Lynch [2007] EWCA Crim 3035, [2008] 1 Cr App Rep 337’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008575480&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008575481&backKey=20_T21008575482&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Makuwa [2006] EWCA Crim 175, [2006] 1 WLR 2755’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21053234878&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T21053243664&backKey=20_T21053243665&csi=279841&docNo=3&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Marcus [2004] EWCA Crim 3387, [2005] Crim LR 384’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008440507&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008450171&backKey=20_T21008450172&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Mason - [1987] 3 All ER 481’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49D0-TWP1-61MX&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49D0-TWP1-61MX&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v McCay - [1991] 1 All ER 232’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4D74-5KD0-TWP1-61F0&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v McGovern - 92 Cr App Rep 228’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4G0V-17T0-TWW8-20J1&csi=280158&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Mushtaq [2005] UKHL 25, [2005] 3 All ER 885’. Court: House of Lords. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21007680248&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21007680252&backKey=20_T21007680253&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=114>.

‘R v Nagah - (1990) 155 JP 229’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4S1B-CH50-TWW8-S083&csi=280389&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Nathaniel [1995] 2 Cr App Rep 565’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhnonsearch.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21026316349&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21026316350&backKey=20_T21026316351&bct=A&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v O’Leary (1988) 87 Cr App Rep 387, 153 JP 69’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008351991&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008351996&backKey=20_T21008351997&csi=279841&docNo=31&scrollToPosition=4332>.

‘---’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?lexisReco=true&A=0.8541600682658985&bct=A&service=citation&linkInfo=C%23GB%23CRAPPREP%23VOL%2587%25PAGE%25387%25&langcountry=GB&ersKey=23_T21026189759&backKey=null&recommendsType=LexisRecoCitationSuggestions&lexisReco=true>.

‘R v Osborne; R v Virtue - [1973] 1 All ER 649’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KN0-TWP1-61CY&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v P and Others - [2001] 2 All ER 58’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-601M&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-601M&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-601M&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Pace and Another’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20986330216&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T20986415502&backKey=20_T20986415503&csi=316762&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=114>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20986330216&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T20986415502&backKey=20_T20986415503&csi=316762&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=114>.

‘R v Popat [1998] 2 Cr App Rep 208, 162 JP 369’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008366337&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008366339&backKey=20_T21008366340&csi=279841&docNo=9&scrollToPosition=1026>.

‘R v Quinn’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008407545&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008408953&backKey=20_T21008408954&csi=316617&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Ryan’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008460054&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008460056&backKey=20_T21008460057&csi=316617&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v S and Another - [2009] 1 All ER 716’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7V2C-XHX0-Y96Y-G391&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Samuel [1988] QB 615, [1988] 2 All ER 135’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008186513&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008186515&backKey=20_T21008186516&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Sang [1980] AC 402, [1979] 2 All ER 1222’. Court: House of Lords. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20986427504&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T20986430194&backKey=20_T20986430195&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=114>.

‘---’. Court: House of Lords. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21025971263&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21025971266&backKey=20_T21025971267&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Sawoniuk - [2000] All ER (D) 154’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4DXH-MH00-TWP1-713B&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Seaton - [2011] 1 All ER 932’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=529J-YKP1-DYBP-M202&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Shannon [2001] 1 WLR 51, [2001] 1 Cr App Rep 168’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhnonsearch.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20986709180&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20986736946&backKey=20_T20986736947&bct=A&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=37>.

‘R v Sharp [1988] 1 All ER 65, [1988] 1 WLR 7’. Court: House of Lords. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20995187495&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20995187497&backKey=20_T20995187498&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Sherif and Others’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008008452&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008018930&backKey=20_T21008018935&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=114>.

‘R v Shillibier’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008153683&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008153686&backKey=20_T21008153687&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Slater [1995] 1 Cr App Rep 584, [1995] Crim LR 244’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?lexisReco=true&A=0.09429681638724541&bct=A&service=citation&linkInfo=C%23GB%23CRAPPREP%23YEAR%251995%25PAGE%25584%25VOL%251%25&langcountry=GB&ersKey=23_T21025763682&backKey=null&recommendsType=LexisRecoCitationSuggestions&lexisReco=true>.

‘R v Smurthwaite; R v Gill - [1994] 1 All ER 898’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4D74-5KD0-TWP1-6150&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4D74-5KD0-TWP1-6150&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘R v Stephens and Another’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008163717&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008163719&backKey=20_T21008163720&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Stone [2005] EWCA Crim 105, [2005] Crim LR 569’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008257198&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008261500&backKey=20_T21008261501&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Thornton [1995] 1 Cr App Rep 578, 158 JP 1155’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21025748537&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21025748539&backKey=20_T21025748540&csi=279841&docNo=17&scrollToPosition=2052>.

‘R v Tompkins (1977) 67 Cr App Rep 181, [1978] Crim LR 290’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21040260199&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21040262801&backKey=20_T21040262802&csi=279841&docNo=8&scrollToPosition=1140>.

‘R v Wahab [2002] EWCA Crim 1570, [2003] 1 Cr App Rep 232’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21007972525&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T21007977013&backKey=20_T21007977014&csi=279841&docNo=3&scrollToPosition=228>.

‘R v Walsh (1989) 91 Cr App Rep 161, [1989] Crim LR 822’. Court: Court of Appeal. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?lexisReco=true&A=0.09645694219097811&bct=A&service=citation&linkInfo=C%23GB%23CRAPPREP%23PAGE%25161%25VOL%2591%25&langcountry=GB&ersKey=23_T21026259022&backKey=null&recommendsType=LexisRecoCitationSuggestions&lexisReco=true>.

‘R v Wang’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21040610802&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21040610804&backKey=20_T21040610805&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘R v Webber - [2004] 1 All ER 770’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-7PC0-TWP1-60CC&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Re Barings Plc and Others; Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Baker and Others - [1998] 1 All ER 673’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60MS&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Re L (a Minor) (Police Investigation: Privilege) - [1996] 2 All ER 78’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60S4&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Re Proulx; R v Bow Street Magistrates’ Court and Another, Ex Parte Proulx - [2001] 1 All ER 57’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J90-TWP1-60VD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘REGINA v. CHRISTOU REGINA v. WRIGHT (CHRISTOPHER) - [1992] Q.B. 979’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-RRG0-TXD5-X1CP&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-RRG0-TXD5-X1CP&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Regina v Lambert - [2002] 2 AC 545’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WT0-TXD8-617R&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘REGINA v. TURNBULL AND ANOTHER REGINA v. WHITBY REGINA v. ROBERTS - [1977] Q.B. 224’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-RRF0-TXD5-X1NY&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

Review by: D. J. Galligan. ‘More Scepticism about Scepticism’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 8.2 (1988): 249–265. Web. <http://www.jstor.org/stable/764313>.

Roberts, Paul. ‘Strict Liability and the Presumption of Innocence: An Exposé of Functionalist Assumptions’. Appraising Strict Liability. Ed. Andrew Simester. Oxford University Press, 2005. 151–194. Web. <http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278510.001.0001/acprof-9780199278510-chapter-7>.

Roberts, Paul, and A. A. S. Zuckerman. Criminal Evidence. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

---. Criminal Evidence. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

---. Criminal Evidence. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print.

‘Salabiaku v France (Application 10589/83) (1988) 13 EHRR 379’. Court: European Court of Human Rights. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/homesubmitForm.do>.

‘Saunders v United Kingdom (Application 19187/91) (1996) 23 EHRR 313, [1998] 1 BCLC 362’. Court: European Court of Human Rights. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/returnTo.do?returnToKey=20_T20987259613>.

‘Scott and Another v R; Barnes and Others v R - [1989] 2 All ER 305’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49F0-TWP1-61B1&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21052981419&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21052981421&backKey=20_T21052981422&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions [2005] 1 All ER 237’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21052981419&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21052981421&backKey=20_T21052981422&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘Sheldrake v DPP; A-G’s Reference (No 4 of 2002) [2004] UKHL 43, [2005] 1 AC 264’. Court: House of Lords. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21052999223&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21052999225&backKey=20_T21052999226&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=0>.

‘---’. Court: House of Lords. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21052999223&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21052999225&backKey=20_T21052999226&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=0>.

Simester, Andrew, ed. Appraising Strict Liability. Oxford University Press, 2005. Web. <http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278510.001.0001/acprof-9780199278510>.

Susan Nash. ‘What’s the Matter with Section 78?’ Criminal Law Review (1999): n. pag. Print.

‘Teixeira de Castro v Portugal (1998) 28 EHRR 101, [1998] Crim LR 751’. Court: European Court of Human Rights. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/casessubmitForm.do>.

‘THE KING APPELLANT; AND CHRISTIE RESPONDENT. - [1914] A.C. 545’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD60-TXD8-6174&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘---’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD60-TXD8-6174&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘THE QUEEN v. COX AND RAILTON. - (1884) 14 Q.B.D. 153’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-4RX0-TXD5-X1KJ&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Three Rivers District Council and Others v Governor and Company of the Bank of England’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21040113664&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21040113666&backKey=20_T21040113667&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=115>.

‘Tido v R - [2012] 2 LRC 203’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=55J0-H501-DYJ0-81BM&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

Twining, William. Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays. 2nd ed. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Print.

---. Rethinking Evidence: Exploratory Essays. 2nd ed. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. Print.

‘Warren v Attorney General for Jersey - [2011] 2 All ER 513’. n. pag. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=52VH-9P71-DYBP-M0N5&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘WAUGH APPELLANT AND BRITISH RAILWAYS BOARD RESPONDENTS - [1980] A.C. 521’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD40-TXD8-61FF&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘WHEELER v. LE MARCHANT. [1880 W. 1793] - (1881) 17 Ch.D. 675’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-6CV0-TXD6-Y1K2&csi=296988&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

‘Williams and Another v Director of Public Prosecutions - [1993] 3 All ER 365’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49F0-TWP1-619X&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

Williams, Glanville. ‘The Logic of "Exceptions”’. The Cambridge Law Journal 47.02 (1988): n. pag. Web.

‘WOOLMINGTON APPELLANT; AND THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS RESPONDENT. - [1935] A.C. 462’. Web. <http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD30-TXD8-60BS&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t>.

Bibliography for LAWS3006: Law of Evidence BETA