1.
Huxley, P.: Blackstone’s statutes on evidence. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
2.
Christina McAlhone: Core statutes on evidence. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).
3.
Claire McGourlay.: Evidence statutes 2012-2013. Routledge, London (2013).
4.
Dennis, I.H.: The law of evidence. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
5.
Munday, R.J.C.: Evidence. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom (2013).
6.
Choo, A.L.-T.: Evidence. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012).
7.
Ashworth, A., Redmayne, M.: The criminal process. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
8.
Duff, A.: The trial on trial. Hart, Oxford (2004).
9.
Roberts, P., Zuckerman, A.A.S.: Criminal evidence. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
10.
Twining, W.: Rethinking evidence: exploratory essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006).
11.
Ashworth, A., Redmayne, M.: The criminal process. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
12.
Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/25/contents.
13.
CPS v F (Rev 2) [2011] EWCA Crim 1844 (21 July 2011), http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2011/1844.html.
14.
Dennis, I.H.: The law of evidence. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
15.
Roberts, P., Zuckerman, A.A.S.: Criminal evidence. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
16.
Lon L. Fuller and Kenneth I. Winston: The Forms and Limits of Adjudication. Harvard Law Review. 92, 353–409 (1978).
17.
Twining, W.: Rethinking evidence: exploratory essays. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006).
18.
Review by: D. J. Galligan: More Scepticism about Scepticism. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 8, 249–265 (1988).
19.
Dworkin: Principle, Policy, Procedure. In: Crime, proof and punishment: essays in memory of Sir Rupert Cross. Butterworths, London (1981).
20.
Duff, A.: The trial on trial. Hart, Oxford (2004).
21.
Human Rights Act 1998, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/42/contents.
22.
European Convention on Human Rights and its Five Protocols, http://www.hri.org/docs/ECHR50.html.
23.
R v Horncastle and others (Appellants) (on appeal from the Court of Appeal Criminal Division) - UKSC_2009_0073_Judgment.pdf, https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2009-0073-judgment.pdf.
24.
CASE OF AL-KHAWAJA AND TAHERY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (Applications nos. 26766/05 and 22228/06), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-108072#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-108072%22]}.
25.
R v Christie [1914] AC 545, 10 Cr App Rep 141, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20978998189&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20978998191&backKey=20_T20978998192&csi=279841&docNo=23&scrollToPosition=3306.
26.
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/60/section/78.
27.
R v P and others - [2001] 2 All ER 58, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-601M&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
28.
Brown v Stott (Procurator Fiscal, Dunfermline) and another - [2001] 2 All ER 97, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-6129&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
29.
Dennis, I.H.: The law of evidence. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
30.
Roberts, P., Zuckerman, A.A.S.: Criminal evidence. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010).
31.
Director of Public Prosecutions v Kilbourne - [1973] 1 All ER 440, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KP0-TWP1-60P5&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
32.
Hollingham v Head (1858) 4 CBNS 388, 27 LJCP 241. Court: English court pre-dating November1874.
33.
R v Blastland - [1985] 2 All ER 1095.
34.
R v Sawoniuk - [2000] All ER (D) 154, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4DXH-MH00-TWP1-713B&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
35.
R v Greenwood - [2004] All ER (D) 17 (Jun), http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=55Y7-JW31-DYBP-N4RK&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
36.
R v Pace and another, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20986330216&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T20986415502&backKey=20_T20986415503&csi=316762&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=114.
37.
R v Sang [1980] AC 402, [1979] 2 All ER 1222, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20986427504&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T20986430194&backKey=20_T20986430195&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=114.
38.
R v King’s Lynn Magistrates’ Court, ex parte Holland - [1993] 2 All ER 377.
39.
R v Smurthwaite; R v Gill - [1994] 1 All ER 898, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4D74-5KD0-TWP1-6150&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
40.
R v Khan (Sultan) - [1996] 3 All ER 289.
41.
Khan v United Kingdom (Application 35394/97) (2000) 31 EHRR 45, 8 BHRC 310, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20986573662&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20986573665&backKey=20_T20986573666&csi=279841&docNo=8&scrollToPosition=1482.
42.
R v Shannon [2001] 1 WLR 51, [2001] 1 Cr App Rep 168, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhnonsearch.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20986709180&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20986736946&backKey=20_T20986736947&bct=A&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=37.
43.
R v P and others - [2001] 2 All ER 58, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-601M&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
44.
David Ormerod and Diane Birch: The evolution of the discretionary exclusion of evidence. Criminal Law Review. (2004).
45.
PART 32 - EVIDENCE - Civil Procedure Rules, http://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part32.
46.
Jones v University of Warwick - [2003] 3 All ER 760, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-610V&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
47.
Dennis, I.H.: The law of evidence. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
48.
Funke v France (Application 10828/84) [1993] 1 CMLR 897, 16 EHRR 297, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/homesubmitForm.do.
49.
Saunders v United Kingdom (Application 19187/91) (1996) 23 EHRR 313, [1998] 1 BCLC 362, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/returnTo.do?returnToKey=20_T20987259613.
50.
Murray v United Kingdom (Application 18731/91) (1996) 22 EHRR 29, (1996) Times, 9 February, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20987277155&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20987277157&backKey=20_T20987277158&csi=279841&docNo=17&scrollToPosition=3420.
51.
R v S and another - [2009] 1 All ER 716, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7V2C-XHX0-Y96Y-G391&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
52.
Jalloh v Germany (Application 54810/00) (2006) 44 EHRR 667, [2007] Crim LR 717, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20987323214&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20987323216&backKey=20_T20987323217&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=114.
53.
Heaney and McGuinness v Ireland (Application No 34720/97) (2000) 33 EHRR 264, [2000] ECHR 34720/97, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20987345757&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20987345759&backKey=20_T20987345760&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
54.
O’Halloran and Francis v United Kingdom (App nos 15809/02 and 25624/02) - [2007] ECHR 15809/02, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4P3V-80X0-TWP1-G1DB&csi=274793&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
55.
Dennis, I.H.: The law of evidence. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
56.
THE KING APPELLANT; AND CHRISTIE RESPONDENT. - [1914] A.C. 545, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD60-TXD8-6174&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
57.
Parkes v R [1976] 3 All ER 380, [1976] 1 WLR 1251, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/returnTo.do?returnToKey=20_T20987485970.
58.
O, R v [2005] EWCA Crim 3082 (2 November 2005), http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2005/3082.html.
59.
R v Collins; R v Keep [2004] EWCA Crim 33, [2004] 1 WLR 1705, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/homesubmitForm.do.
60.
Dennis, I.H.: The law of evidence. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
61.
R v Betts [2001] EWCA Crim 224, [2001] 2 Cr App Rep 257. Court: Court of Appeal.
62.
Evidence - whether a suggested motive for making a false allegation is a fact for the purposes of section 34. Criminal Law Review. (2000).
63.
Adverse inference. Criminal Law Review. (1999).
64.
R v Webber - [2004] 1 All ER 770.
65.
Mohammad, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1871 (12 June 2009), http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2009/1871.html.
66.
R v Condron and Condron [1997] 1 WLR 827, [1997] 1 Cr App Rep 185, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20995052851&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20995052853&backKey=20_T20995052854&csi=279841&docNo=6&scrollToPosition=684.
67.
R v Argent, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20995071401&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T20995072699&backKey=20_T20995075000&csi=316617&docNo=2&hitNo=ORIGHIT_2&scrollToPosition=114.
68.
R v Argent, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20995071401&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T20995072699&backKey=20_T20995075000&csi=316617&docNo=2&hitNo=ORIGHIT_2&scrollToPosition=114.
69.
R v Betts and another - [2001] All ER (D) 108 (Feb), http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4SPK-6M40-TWP1-70XD&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
70.
R v Hoare; R v Pierce, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20995114321&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20995114326&backKey=20_T20995114327&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
71.
R v Beckles - [2005] 1 All ER 705, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FJF-DXM0-TWP1-61K1&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
72.
R v Loizou, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20995133865&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20995133867&backKey=20_T20995133868&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
73.
R v Compton and others - [2002] All ER (D) 149 (Dec).
74.
Dennis, I.H.: The law of evidence. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
75.
R v Sharp [1988] 1 All ER 65, [1988] 1 WLR 7, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20995187495&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T20995187497&backKey=20_T20995187498&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
76.
R v Hasan - [2005] 4 All ER 685, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4HH7-PSG0-TWP1-60JW&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
77.
R v Mushtaq [2005] UKHL 25, [2005] 3 All ER 885, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21007680248&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21007680252&backKey=20_T21007680253&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=114.
78.
R v Pace and another, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T20986330216&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T20986415502&backKey=20_T20986415503&csi=316762&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=114.
79.
R v Fulling [1987] QB 426, [1987] 2 All ER 65, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/homesubmitForm.do.
80.
R v Foster, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21007912817&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T21007926003&backKey=20_T21007926004&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
81.
R v Goldenberg (1988) 88 Cr App Rep 285, 152 JP 557, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/homesubmitForm.do.
82.
R v Crampton (1990) 92 Cr App Rep 369, [1991] Crim LR 277, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21007956791&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21007956793&backKey=20_T21007956794&csi=279841&docNo=6&scrollToPosition=798.
83.
R v Wahab [2002] EWCA Crim 1570, [2003] 1 Cr App Rep 232, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21007972525&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T21007977013&backKey=20_T21007977014&csi=279841&docNo=3&scrollToPosition=228.
84.
Re Proulx; R v Bow Street Magistrates’ Court and another, ex parte Proulx - [2001] 1 All ER 57, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J90-TWP1-60VD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
85.
R v Sherif and others, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008008452&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008018930&backKey=20_T21008018935&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=114.
86.
R v Delaney (1988) 88 Cr App Rep 338, 153 JP 103. Court: Court of Appeal.
87.
R v McGovern - 92 Cr App Rep 228, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4G0V-17T0-TWW8-20J1&csi=280158&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
88.
Blackburn, R. v [2005] EWCA Crim 1349 (25 May 2005), http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2005/1349.html.
89.
R v Keenan [1990] 2 QB 54, [1989] 3 All ER 598, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/homesubmitForm.do.
90.
R v Shillibier, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008153683&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008153686&backKey=20_T21008153687&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
91.
R v Stephens and another, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008163717&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008163719&backKey=20_T21008163720&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
92.
R v Samuel [1988] QB 615, [1988] 2 All ER 135, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008186513&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008186515&backKey=20_T21008186516&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
93.
R v Alladice (1988) 87 Cr App Rep 380, [1988] Crim LR 608, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/casessubmitForm.do.
94.
Cadder v Her Majesty’s Advocate, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008213565&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008213567&backKey=20_T21008213568&csi=316762&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=228.
95.
R v Mason - [1987] 3 All ER 481.
96.
R v Keenan - [1989] 3 All ER 598, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49G0-TWP1-603Y&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
97.
R v Canale [1990] 2 All ER 187, 91 Cr App Rep 1, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008243655&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008243657&backKey=20_T21008243658&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=114.
98.
R v Stone [2005] EWCA Crim 105, [2005] Crim LR 569, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008257198&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008261500&backKey=20_T21008261501&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=0.
99.
Dennis, I.H.: The law of evidence. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
100.
J.D. Jackson: The insufficiency of identification evidence based on personal impression. Criminal Law Review. (1986).
101.
Andrew Roberts: The problem of mistaken identification: some observations on process. International Journal of Evidence & Proof. (2004).
102.
R v O’Leary (1988) 87 Cr App Rep 387, 153 JP 69, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008351991&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008351996&backKey=20_T21008351997&csi=279841&docNo=31&scrollToPosition=4332.
103.
R v Popat [1998] 2 Cr App Rep 208, 162 JP 369, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008366337&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008366339&backKey=20_T21008366340&csi=279841&docNo=9&scrollToPosition=1026.
104.
R v Forbes - [2001] 1 All ER 686, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J90-TWP1-602T&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
105.
R v Folan, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008393644&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008393647&backKey=20_T21008393648&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=114.
107.
R v Nagah - (1990) 155 JP 229, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4S1B-CH50-TWW8-S083&csi=280389&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
108.
R v Marcus [2004] EWCA Crim 3387, [2005] Crim LR 384, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008440507&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008450171&backKey=20_T21008450172&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
109.
R v Ryan, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008460054&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008460056&backKey=20_T21008460057&csi=316617&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=0.
110.
Barnes v Chief Constable of Durham, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008480967&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008480969&backKey=20_T21008480970&csi=316617&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
111.
Tido v R - [2012] 2 LRC 203, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=55J0-H501-DYJ0-81BM&csi=280207&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
112.
THE KING APPELLANT; AND CHRISTIE RESPONDENT. - [1914] A.C. 545, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD60-TXD8-6174&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
113.
R v Osborne; R v Virtue - [1973] 1 All ER 649, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KN0-TWP1-61CY&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
114.
R v McCay - [1991] 1 All ER 232, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4D74-5KD0-TWP1-61F0&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
115.
Criminal Justice Act 2003 (2003 c 44), http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61N0-TWPY-Y1DV&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
116.
R v Lynch [2007] EWCA Crim 3035, [2008] 1 Cr App Rep 337, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21008575480&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21008575481&backKey=20_T21008575482&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=0.
117.
Chinn, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 501 (15 March 2012), http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2012/501.html.
118.
R v George [2002] EWCA Crim 1923, [2003] Crim LR 282, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/homesubmitForm.do.
119.
REGINA v. TURNBULL AND ANOTHER REGINA v. WHITBY REGINA v. ROBERTS - [1977] Q.B. 224, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-RRF0-TXD5-X1NY&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
120.
R v Bentley (1991) 99 Cr App Rep 342, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?lexisReco=true&A=0.021423386029904457&bct=A&service=citation&linkInfo=C%23GB%23CRAPPREP%23VOL%2599%25PAGE%25342%25&langcountry=GB&ersKey=23_T21025695448&backKey=null&recommendsType=LexisRecoCitationSuggestions&lexisReco=true.
121.
JUNIOR REID APPELLANT AND THE QUEEN RESPONDENT ROY DENNIS APPELLANT AND THE QUEEN RESPONDENT OLIVER WHYLIE APPELLANT AND THE QUEEN RESPONDENT ERROL REECE AND OTHERS APPELLANTS AND THE QUEEN RESPONDENT [APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL OF JAMAICA] - [1990] 1 A.C. 363.
122.
Daley v R - [1993] 4 All ER 86, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-61JR&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
123.
R v Thornton [1995] 1 Cr App Rep 578, 158 JP 1155, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21025748537&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21025748539&backKey=20_T21025748540&csi=279841&docNo=17&scrollToPosition=2052.
124.
R v Slater [1995] 1 Cr App Rep 584, [1995] Crim LR 244, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?lexisReco=true&A=0.09429681638724541&bct=A&service=citation&linkInfo=C%23GB%23CRAPPREP%23YEAR%251995%25PAGE%25584%25VOL%251%25&langcountry=GB&ersKey=23_T21025763682&backKey=null&recommendsType=LexisRecoCitationSuggestions&lexisReco=true.
125.
R v I [2007] EWCA Crim 923, [2007] 2 Cr App Rep 316, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/returnTo.do?returnToKey=20_T21025781192.
126.
R v Fergus (1993) 98 Cr App Rep 313, 158 JP 49, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21025816914&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21025816916&backKey=20_T21025816917&csi=279841&docNo=8&scrollToPosition=1127.
127.
Devlin, P.: The judge. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1979).
128.
Dennis, I.H.: The law of evidence. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
129.
KURUMA, SON OF KANIU APPELLANT; AND THE QUEEN RESPONDENT. ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR EASTERN AFRICA. - [1955] A.C. 197, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD30-TXD8-613J&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
130.
R v Sang [1980] AC 402, [1979] 2 All ER 1222, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21025971263&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21025971266&backKey=20_T21025971267&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=0.
131.
Scott and another v R; Barnes and others v R - [1989] 2 All ER 305, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49F0-TWP1-61B1&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
132.
A and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department (No 2) - [2006] 1 All ER 575.
133.
R v King’s Lynn Magistrates’ Court, ex parte Holland - [1993] 2 All ER 377, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-6085&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
134.
R v Smurthwaite; R v Gill - [1994] 1 All ER 898, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4D74-5KD0-TWP1-6150&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
135.
R v Khan (Sultan) - [1996] 3 All ER 289, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J70-TWP1-61K0&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
136.
Human rights: right to respect for private life Khan v United Kingdom (35394/97) (2001) 31 E.H.R.R. 45 (ECHR). Criminal Law Review. (2000).
137.
R v Chalkley; R v Jeffries - [1998] 2 All ER 155, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60RP&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
138.
Gafgen v Germany (Application 22978/05) (2010) 52 EHRR 1, [2010] Crim LR 865, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21026147269&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T21026162818&backKey=20_T21026162819&csi=279841&docNo=3&scrollToPosition=228.
139.
R v O’Leary (1988) 87 Cr App Rep 387, 153 JP 69, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?lexisReco=true&A=0.8541600682658985&bct=A&service=citation&linkInfo=C%23GB%23CRAPPREP%23VOL%2587%25PAGE%25387%25&langcountry=GB&ersKey=23_T21026189759&backKey=null&recommendsType=LexisRecoCitationSuggestions&lexisReco=true.
140.
REGINA v. CHRISTOU REGINA v. WRIGHT (CHRISTOPHER) - [1992] Q.B. 979, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-RRG0-TXD5-X1CP&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
141.
R v King’s Lynn Magistrates’ Court, ex parte Holland - [1993] 2 All ER 377, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-6085&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
142.
R v Chalkley; R v Jeffries - [1998] 2 All ER 155, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60RP&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
143.
R v Walsh (1989) 91 Cr App Rep 161, [1989] Crim LR 822, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?lexisReco=true&A=0.09645694219097811&bct=A&service=citation&linkInfo=C%23GB%23CRAPPREP%23PAGE%25161%25VOL%2591%25&langcountry=GB&ersKey=23_T21026259022&backKey=null&recommendsType=LexisRecoCitationSuggestions&lexisReco=true.
144.
Susan Nash: What’s the matter with section 78? Criminal Law Review. (1999).
145.
David Ormerod and Diane Birch: The evolution of the discretionary exclusion of evidence. Criminal Law Review. (2004).
146.
R v Nathaniel [1995] 2 Cr App Rep 565, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhnonsearch.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21026316349&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21026316350&backKey=20_T21026316351&bct=A&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
147.
Attorney General’s Reference (No 3 of 1999) - [2001] 1 All ER 577, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J70-TWP1-61J5&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
148.
Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2001/16/section/82.
149.
R v Khan (Sultan) - [1996] 3 All ER 289, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J70-TWP1-61K0&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
150.
R v P and others - [2001] 2 All ER 58, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-601M&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
151.
Gafgen v Germany (Application 22978/05) (2010) 52 EHRR 1, [2010] Crim LR 865, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21026497279&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21026497281&backKey=20_T21026497282&csi=279841&docNo=3&scrollToPosition=228.
152.
Her Majesty’s Advocate v P (Scotland), http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21026512848&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21026512850&backKey=20_T21026512851&csi=316762&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
153.
R v Mason - [1987] 3 All ER 481, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49D0-TWP1-61MX&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
154.
REGINA v. CHRISTOU REGINA v. WRIGHT (CHRISTOPHER) - [1992] Q.B. 979, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-RRG0-TXD5-X1CP&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
155.
Williams and another v Director of Public Prosecutions - [1993] 3 All ER 365, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49F0-TWP1-619X&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
156.
R v Looseley; Attorney General’s Reference (No 3 of 2000) - [2001] 4 All ER 897, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J90-TWP1-60F8&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
157.
Teixeira de Castro v Portugal (1998) 28 EHRR 101, [1998] Crim LR 751, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/casessubmitForm.do.
158.
Ho, H.L.: State entrapment. Legal Studies. 31, 71–95 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00176.x.
159.
R v Looseley, A-G’s Reference (No 3 of 2000) [2001] UKHL 53, [2001] 4 All ER 897, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21026826239&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21026826241&backKey=20_T21026826242&csi=279841&docNo=3&scrollToPosition=228.
160.
R v Aujla [1998] 2 Cr App Rep 16, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?lexisReco=true&A=0.9873944799276771&bct=A&service=citation&linkInfo=C%23GB%23CRAPPREP%23YEAR%251998%25VOL%252%25PAGE%2516%25&langcountry=GB&ersKey=23_T21026845671&backKey=null&recommendsType=LexisRecoCitationSuggestions&lexisReco=true.
161.
Grant v R [2005] EWCA Crim 1089, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhnonsearch.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21026905936&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21026905937&backKey=20_T21026905938&bct=A&csi=274662&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=222.
162.
Warren v Attorney General for Jersey - [2011] 2 All ER 513.
163.
Dennis, I.H.: The law of evidence. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
164.
Minet v Morgan (1873) 8 Ch App 361, 42 LJ Ch 627, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/casessubmitForm.do.
165.
R v Derby Magistrates’ Court, ex parte B; and another appeal - [1995] 4 All ER 526, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-61HH&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
166.
R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21027018113&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21027018117&backKey=20_T21027018119&csi=316762&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
167.
BRENNAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM - 39846/98 [2001] ECHR 596 (16 October 2001), http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2001/596.html.
168.
*R v Grant - [2005] All ER (D) 44 (May), http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=55Y7-JVY1-DYBP-N226&csi=274665&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
169.
Balabel and another v Air-India - [1988] 2 All ER 246, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49D0-TWP1-61NN&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
170.
R v King [1983] 1 All ER 929, [1983] 1 WLR 411, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/casessubmitForm.do.
171.
Three Rivers District Council and others v Governor and Company of the Bank of England, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21040113664&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21040113666&backKey=20_T21040113667&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=115.
172.
THE QUEEN v. COX AND RAILTON. - (1884) 14 Q.B.D. 153, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K3D-4RX0-TXD5-X1KJ&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
173.
Barclays Bank plc and others v Eustice and others - [1995] 4 All ER 511, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-618B&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
174.
Butler v Board of Trade [1971] Ch 680, [1970] 3 All ER 593, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21040153841&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21040153843&backKey=20_T21040153844&csi=279841&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
175.
Francis & Francis (a firm) v Central Criminal Court - [1988] 3 All ER 775, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49G0-TWP1-60D2&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
176.
R v Seaton - [2011] 1 All ER 932, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=529J-YKP1-DYBP-M202&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
177.
Great Atlantic Insurance Co v Home Insurance Co and Others - [1981] 2 All ER 485, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KV0-TWP1-60T9&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
178.
General Accident Fire and Life Assurance Corpn Ltd v Tanter, The Zephyr [1984] 1 All ER 35, [1984] 1 WLR 100, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21040226521&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T21040230412&backKey=20_T21040230413&csi=279841&docNo=3&hitNo=ORIGHIT_1&scrollToPosition=570.
179.
CALCRAFT v. GUEST. - [1898] 1 Q.B. 759, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4F-RWM0-TXD5-X1CM&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
180.
R v Tompkins (1977) 67 Cr App Rep 181, [1978] Crim LR 290, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21040260199&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21040262801&backKey=20_T21040262802&csi=279841&docNo=8&scrollToPosition=1140.
181.
ITC Film Distributors v Video Exchange Ltd and others - [1982] 2 All ER 241, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KT0-TWP1-60PM&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
182.
Lord Ashburton v Pape - [1911-13] All ER Rep 708, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FPP-FDK0-TWXJ-20YW&csi=279846&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
183.
Goddard and another v Nationwide Building Society - [1986] 3 All ER 264, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KV0-TWP1-60P5&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
184.
BUTLER v. BOARD OF TRADE [1970 B. No. 1479] - [1971] Ch. 680, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-6CY0-TXD6-Y17B&csi=296988&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
185.
Istil Group Inc and another v Zahoor and another - [2003] 2 All ER 252, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J90-TWP1-6017&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
186.
R v Derby Magistrates’ Court, ex parte B; and another appeal - [1995] 4 All ER 526, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-61HH&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
187.
WHEELER v. LE MARCHANT. [1880 W. 1793] - (1881) 17 Ch.D. 675, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-6CV0-TXD6-Y1K2&csi=296988&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
188.
WAUGH APPELLANT AND BRITISH RAILWAYS BOARD RESPONDENTS - [1980] A.C. 521, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD40-TXD8-61FF&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
189.
ALFRED CROMPTON AMUSEMENT MACHINES LTD. APPELLANTS AND CUSTOMS AND EXCISE COMMISSIONERS (No. 2) RESPONDENTS - [1974] A.C. 405, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD40-TXD8-6168&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
190.
Guinness Peat Properties Ltd and others v Fitzroy Robinson Partnership (a firm) - [1987] 2 All ER 716, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-49F0-TWP1-60FC&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
191.
Re Barings plc and others; Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Baker and others - [1998] 1 All ER 673, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60MS&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
192.
Harmony Shipping Co SA v Davis and others - [1979] 3 All ER 177, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KT0-TWP1-612D&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
193.
R (on the Application of Kelly) v Warley Magistrates Court and another, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21040517053&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21040517055&backKey=20_T21040517056&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=114.
194.
Re L (a minor) (police investigation: privilege) - [1996] 2 All ER 78, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60S4&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
195.
Dennis, I.H.: The law of evidence. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
196.
WOOLMINGTON APPELLANT; AND THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS RESPONDENT. - [1935] A.C. 462, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD30-TXD8-60BS&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
197.
R v Galbraith - [1981] 2 All ER 1060, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-3KT0-TWP1-614Y&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
198.
R v Gill - [1963] 2 All ER 688, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CRN-PP80-TWP1-61NW&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
199.
R v Acott [1997] 1 All ER 706, [1997] 1 WLR 306, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/casessubmitForm.do.
200.
BRATTY APPELLANT; AND ATTORNEY-GENERAL FOR NORTHERN IRELAND RESPONDENT. - [1963] A.C. 386, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4W-PD40-TXD8-6199&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
201.
R v Wang, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21040610802&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21040610804&backKey=20_T21040610805&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
202.
Regina v Lambert - [2002] 2 AC 545, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WT0-TXD8-617R&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
203.
Dennis, I.H.: The law of evidence. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2013).
204.
M`Naghten`s Case (1843) 10 Cl. & Fin. 200, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/docview/attachRetrieve.do?csi=338869&A=0.17910976543836576&ersKey=23_T21040640278&urlEnc=ISO-8859-1&inline=y&smi=60414&componentseq=1&key=7YV4-G0V0-YC0H-X35H-00000-00&type=pdf&displayType=full_pdf&lni=7YV4-G0V0-YC0H-X35H&docTitle=Daniel%20M|Naghten|s%20Case%20-%20(1843)%208%20ER%20718.
205.
Homicide Act 1957, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/5-6/11/section/1.
206.
R v Hunt - [1987] 1 All ER 1, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4S32-G3C0-TWP1-61MM&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
207.
Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown Prosecution Service CCU South West) v Wright; R (on the application of Scott and others v Taunton Deane Magistrates’ Court, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhnonsearch.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21040708707&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21040708708&backKey=20_T21040708709&bct=A&csi=316762&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
208.
Williams, G.: The Logic of "Exceptions”. The Cambridge Law Journal. 47, (1988). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300118021.
209.
Salabiaku v France (Application 10589/83) (1988) 13 EHRR 379, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/homesubmitForm.do.
210.
R v Lambert - [2001] 3 All ER 577, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4HV7-56D0-TWP1-60CD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
211.
Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21052981419&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21052981421&backKey=20_T21052981422&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
212.
Sheldrake v DPP; A-G’s Reference (No 4 of 2002) [2004] UKHL 43, [2005] 1 AC 264, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21052999223&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21052999225&backKey=20_T21052999226&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=0.
213.
R v Lambert - [2001] 3 All ER 577, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4HV7-56D0-TWP1-60CD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
214.
R v Johnstone - [2003] 3 All ER 884, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-7P90-TWP1-61K2&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
215.
R v Chargot Ltd (t/a Contract Services) and others, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21053050782&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21053050784&backKey=20_T21053050785&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
216.
R v Lambert - [2001] 3 All ER 577, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4HV7-56D0-TWP1-60CD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
217.
R v Johnstone - [2003] 3 All ER 884, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-7P90-TWP1-61K2&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
218.
*R v Keogh - [2007] All ER (D) 105 (Mar).
219.
R v Lambert - [2001] 3 All ER 577, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4HV7-56D0-TWP1-60CD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
220.
Sheldrake v Director of Public Prosecutions [2005] 1 All ER 237, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21052981419&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21052981421&backKey=20_T21052981422&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
221.
A-G’s Reference (No 1 of 2004), R v Edwards [2004] EWCA Crim 1025, [2005] 4 All ER 457, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?lexisReco=true&A=0.8295584090903456&bct=A&service=citation&linkInfo=C%23GB%23EWCACRIM%23PAGE%251025%25YEAR%252004%25&langcountry=GB&ersKey=23_T21053213177&backKey=null&recommendsType=LexisRecoCitationSuggestions&lexisReco=true.
222.
R v Makuwa [2006] EWCA Crim 175, [2006] 1 WLR 2755, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21053234878&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=1&resultsUrlKey=0_T21053243664&backKey=20_T21053243665&csi=279841&docNo=3&scrollToPosition=0.
223.
Director of Public Prosecutions v Wright; R (on the application of Scott and others) v Taunton Deane Magistrates’ Court - [2009] 3 All ER 726, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7WB6-C160-Y96Y-G26S&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
224.
A-G’s Reference (No 1 of 2004), R v Edwards [2004] EWCA Crim 1025, [2005] 4 All ER 457, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/enhRunRemoteLink.do?lexisReco=true&A=0.8295584090903456&bct=A&service=citation&linkInfo=C%23GB%23EWCACRIM%23PAGE%251025%25YEAR%252004%25&langcountry=GB&ersKey=23_T21053213177&backKey=null&recommendsType=LexisRecoCitationSuggestions&lexisReco=true.
225.
Sheldrake v DPP; A-G’s Reference (No 4 of 2002) [2004] UKHL 43, [2005] 1 AC 264, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21052999223&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21052999225&backKey=20_T21052999226&csi=279841&docNo=2&scrollToPosition=0.
226.
R v Lambert - [2001] 3 All ER 577, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4HV7-56D0-TWP1-60CD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
227.
Barnfather v Islington Education Authority [2003] EWHC 418 (Admin), [2003] 1 WLR 2318, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/search/casessubmitForm.do.
228.
R v G, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/results/enhdocview.do?docLinkInd=true&ersKey=23_T21053415028&format=GNBFULL&startDocNo=0&resultsUrlKey=0_T21053415030&backKey=20_T21053415031&csi=274662&docNo=1&scrollToPosition=0.
229.
Simester, A. ed: Appraising Strict Liability. Oxford University Press (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278510.001.0001.
230.
Roberts, P.: Strict Liability and the Presumption of Innocence: An Exposé of Functionalist Assumptions. In: Simester, A. (ed.) Appraising Strict Liability. pp. 151–194. Oxford University Press (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278510.003.0007.
231.
Duff, R.A.: Strict Liability, Legal Presumptions, and the Presumption of Innocence. In: Simester, A. (ed.) Appraising Strict Liability. pp. 125–150. Oxford University Press (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278510.003.0006.
