1.
Oldham M. Blackstone’s Statutes on Family Law 2014-2015. Vol Blackstone’s statutes series. 23rd ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.
2.
Herring J. Family Law. Vol Longman law series. 6th ed. Pearson; 2013.
3.
Lowe NV, Douglas G, Bromley PM. Bromley’s Family Law. 10th ed. Oxford University Press; 2007.
4.
Masson JM, Bailey-Harris RJ, Probert R, Cretney SM. Cretney Principles of Family Law. 8th ed. Sweet & Maxwell; 2008.
5.
Diduck A. Law’s Families. Vol Law in context. LexisNexis; 2003.
6.
George RH. Ideas and Debates in Family Law. Hart; 2012.
7.
Herring J, Probert R, Gilmore S. Great Debates in Family Law. Vol Palgrave Macmillan great debates in law. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
8.
Choudhry S, Herring J. European Human Rights and Family Law. Hart; 2010.
9.
Gilmore S, Herring J, Probert R. Landmark Cases in Family Law. Hart; 2011.
10.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Family Law, Gender and the State. 3rd ed. Hart; 2012.
11.
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Family Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2011.
12.
Hale B. The Family, Law & Society. 6th ed. Oxford University Press; 2009.
13.
Archard D. Children: Rights and Childhood. Vol Ideas. 2nd ed. Taylor and Francis; 2004. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=199397
14.
Archard D. Children, Family, and the State. Vol Live questions in ethics and moral philosophy. Ashgate; 2003.
15.
Bainham A. Children and Their Families: Contact, Rights and Welfare. Hart; 2003.
16.
Barker N. Not the Marrying Kind: A Feminist Critique of Same-Sex Marriage. Vol Palgrave Macmillan socio-legal studies. Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
17.
Barlow A. Cohabitation, Marriage and the Law: Social Change and Legal Reform in the 21st Century. Hart; 2005.
18.
Bernstein A. Marriage Proposals: Questioning a Legal Status. New York University Press; 2006.
19.
Bradley D. Family Law and Political Culture: (Scandinavian Laws in Comparative Perspective). Vol Modern legal studies. Sweet & Maxwell; 1996.
20.
Monk D, Bridgeman J. Feminist Perspectives on Child Law. Vol Feminist perspectives in law. Cavendish; 2000.
21.
Bridgeman J, Lind C, Keating HM. Responsibility, Law and the Family. Ashgate; 2008.
22.
Bridgeman J, Keating HM, Lind C. Regulating Family Responsibilities. Ashgate; 2011.
23.
Burton M. Legal Responses to Domestic Violence. Routledge-Cavendish; 2008.
24.
Carling AH, Duncan S, Edwards R. Analysing Families: Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice. Routledge; 2002.
25.
Collier R, Sheldon S. Fragmenting Fatherhood: A Socio-Legal Study. Hart; 2008.
26.
Cretney S. Family Law in the Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press; 2005. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280919.001.0001
27.
Sclater SD. Divorce: A Psychosocial Study. Ashgate; 1999.
28.
Piper C, Sclater SD. Undercurrents of Divorce. Ashgate; 1999.
29.
Diduck A. Marriage and Cohabitation. Vol The family, law&society. Ashgate; 2008.
30.
Diduck A, O’Donovan K. Feminist Perspectives on Family Law. Routledge-Cavendish; 2006.
31.
Dobash RE, Cavanagh K. Changing Violent Men. Vol Sage series on violence against women. Sage Publications; 2000.
32.
Donzelot J, Hurley R. The Policing of Families. Hutchinson
33.
Lowe NV, Douglas G. The Continuing Evolution of Family Law. Family Law; 2009.
34.
Eekelaar J. Family Law and Personal Life. Oxford University Press; 2007. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535422.001.0001
35.
Eekelaar J, Maclean M. Family Justice: The Work of Family Judges in Uncertain Times. Hart Publishing; 2013.
36.
Eskridge WN. Equality Practice: Civil Unions and the Future of Gay Rights. Routledge; 2002.
37.
Finch J, Mason J. Negotiating Family Responsibilities. Routledge; 1992.
38.
Fineman M. The Illusion of Equality: The Rhetoric and Reality of Divorce Reform. University of Chicago Press; 1991.
39.
Fineman M. The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family, and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. Routledge; 1995.
40.
Fineman M. The Autonomy Myth: A Theory of Dependency. New Press; 2004.
41.
Fortin J. Children’s Rights and the Developing Law. Vol The law in context series. 3rd ed. Cambridge University Press; 2009.
42.
Freeman MDA. The Moral Status of Children: Essays on the Rights of the Child. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1997.
43.
Goldstein J. The Best Interests of the Child: The Least Detrimental Alternative. Free Press; 1996.
44.
Hale B, Hamlyn Trust. From the Test Tube to the Coffin: Choice and Regulation in Private Life. Vol Hamlyn lectures. Stevens & Sons/Sweet & Maxwell; 1996.
45.
Heaphy B, Smart C, Einarsdottir A. Same Sex Marriages: New Generations, New Relationships. Vol Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.
46.
Herring J. Caring and the Law. Hart Publishing; 2013.
47.
Heinze E. Of Innocence and Autonomy: Children, Sex and Human Rights. Vol Programme on International Rights of the Child (Series). Dartmouth; 2000.
48.
King M. A Better World for Children?: Explorations in Morality and Authority. Routledge; 1997.
49.
Lee N. Childhood and Society: Growing up in an Age of Uncertainty. Vol Issues in society. Open University; 2001.
50.
Maclean M, Eekelaar J. The Parental Obligation: A Study of Parenthood across Households. Hart Publishing; 1997.
51.
Maclean M, Eekelaar J. Family Law Advocacy: How Barristers Help the Victims of Family Failure. Hart; 2009.
52.
Eekelaar J, Maclean M. Family Justice: The Work of Family Judges in Uncertain Times. Hart Publishing; 2013.
53.
Maclean M, Eekelaar J. Managing Family Justice in Diverse Societies. Vol Oñati international series in law and society. Hart Publishing; 2013.
54.
Maclean M. Parenting after Partnering: Containing Conflict after Separation. Vol Oñati international series in law and society. Hart Pub; 2007.
55.
Dempsey MM. Prosecuting Domestic Violence: A Philosophical Analysis. Vol Oxford monographs on criminal law and justice. Oxford University Press; 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562169.001.1
56.
Miles J, Probert R. Sharing Lives, Dividing Assets: An Inter-Disciplinary Study. Hart Pub; 2009. https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/sharing-lives-dividing-assets-an-inter-disciplinary-study/
57.
Morgan DHJ. Family Connections: An Introduction to Family Studies. Polity Press; 1996.
58.
Morgan DHJ. Rethinking Family Practices. Vol Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life. Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.
59.
Mount F. The Subversive Family: An Alternative History of Love and Marriage. Unwin; 1982.
60.
Mullender A, Morley R. Children Living with Domestic Violence: Putting Men’s Abuse of Women on the Child Care Agenda. Whiting & Birch; 1994.
61.
O’Donovan K. Sexual Divisions in Law. Vol Law in context. Weidenfeld and Nicolson; 1985.
62.
O’Donovan K. Family Law Matters. Vol Law and social theory. Pluto Press; 1993.
63.
Okin SM. Justice, Gender, and the Family. Basic Books; 1989.
64.
Pahl J. Money and Marriage. Macmillan Education; 1989.
65.
Parker S. Informal Marriage, Cohabitation and the Law, 1750-1989. Macmillan; 1990.
66.
Parton N. The Politics of Child Abuse. Macmillan; 1985.
67.
Pateman C. The Sexual Contract. Polity; 1988.
68.
Piper C. The Responsible Parent: A Study of Divorce Mediation. Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1993.
69.
Pizzey E, Forbes A. Scream Quietly or the Neighbours Will Hear. Vol A Penguin special. Penguin; 1974.
70.
Probert R. Family Life and the Law: Under One Roof. Ashgate; 2007.
71.
Probert R. Marriage Law and Practice in the Long Eighteenth Century: A Reassessment. Vol Cambridge studies in English legal history. Cambridge University Press; 2009.
72.
Probert R, Barton C, Cretney SM. Fifty Years in Family Law: Essays for Stephen Cretney. Intersentia; 2012.
73.
Probert R. The Changing Legal Regulation of Cohabitation: From Fornicators to Family, 1600-2010. Vol Law in context. Cambridge University Press; 2012.
74.
Reece H. Divorcing Responsibly. Hart; 2003.
75.
Regan MC. Family Law and the Pursuit of Intimacy. New York University Press; 1993.
76.
Rodger JJ. Family Life and Social Control: A Sociological Perspective. Macmillan; 1996.
77.
Sarat A, Felstiner WLF. Divorce Lawyers and Their Clients: Power and Meaning in the Legal Process. Oxford University Press; 1995.
78.
Shanley ML. Just Marriage. Oxford University Press; 2004.
79.
Silva EB, Smart C. The New Family? Sage; 1999.
80.
Smart C. Personal Life: New Directions in Sociological Thinking. Polity; 2007.
81.
Smart C. The Ties That Bind: Law, Marriage and the Reproduction of Patriarchal Relations. Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1984.
82.
Smart C. Feminism and the Power of Law. Vol Sociology of law and crime. Routledge; 1989.
83.
Smart C, Neale B. Family Fragments? Polity Press; 1999.
84.
Smart C, Neale B, Wade A. The Changing Experience of Childhood: Families and Divorce. Polity; 2001.
85.
Spencer JR, Bois-Pedain A de. Freedom and Responsibility in Reproductive Choice. Hart Publishing; 2006.
86.
Stark E. Coercive Control: The Entrapment of Women in Personal Life. Vol Interpersonal violence. Oxford University Press; 2007.
87.
Wallbank JA, Choudhry S, Herring J. Rights, Gender and Family Law. Routledge; 2010.
88.
Wallerstein JS, Kelly JB. Surviving the Breakup: How Children and Parents Cope with Divorce. Grant McIntyre; 1980.
89.
Wallerstein JS, Blakeslee S. Second Chances. Bantam; 1989.
90.
Weitzman LJ. The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America. 1st Free Press paperback ed. Free Press; 1987.
91.
Wikeley N. Child Support: Law and Policy. Hart; 2006.
92.
International journal of law, policy and the family.
94.
Child and family law quarterly.
95.
The Journal of social welfare & family law.
96.
Family law quarterly.
97.
Children’s Legal Centre (London, England). Childright. Published online 1983.
98.
The International Journal of Children’s Rights » Brill Online. http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/15718182
99.
International Family Law.
100.
Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd - [2001] 1 AC 27. Published online 1999. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WH0-TXD8-61G7&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
101.
Vallianatos and others v Greece (App. nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09) - [2013] ECHR 29381/09. Published online 2013. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BXR-HSG1-DYBP-X29X&csi=274793&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
102.
SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA - 30141/04 [2010] ECHR 995 (24 June 2010). http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/995.html
103.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. *Chapter 1. In: Family Law, Gender and the State. 3rd ed. Hart; 2012.
104.
Herring J. *Chapter 1. In: Family Law. Vol Longman law series. 6th ed. Pearson; 2013.
105.
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 1. In: Family Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2011.
106.
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v M. Published online 2006. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFV1-DYBP-P1PV&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
107.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. *Chapter 5. In: Family Law, Gender and the State. 3rd ed. Hart; 2012.
108.
Green Paper on the Family. http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/publications/green-paper-on-the-family
109.
JDiduck A. A Family by any other Name ... or StarbucksTM comes to England. Journal of Law and Society. 2001;28(2):290-310. doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00190
110.
Bridgeman J, Lind C, Keating HM. Responsibility, Law and the Family. Ashgate; 2008.
111.
Silva EB, Smart C. The New Family? Sage; 1999.
112.
Dewar J. The Normal Chaos of Family Law. Modern Law Review. 1998;61(4):467-485. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00157
113.
Dewar J. Family law and its discontents. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2000;14(1):59-85. doi:10.1093/lawfam/14.1.59
114.
Fineman M. The Neutered Mother, the Sexual Family, and Other Twentieth Century Tragedies. Routledge; 1995.
115.
Weeks, J. Elective Families: lesbian and gay life experiments. In: Analysing Families: Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice. Routledge; 2002.
116.
Carling AH, Duncan S, Edwards R. Analysing Families: Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice. Routledge; 2002.
117.
Diduck A. Shifting Familiarity. Current Legal Problems. 2005;58(1):235-254. doi:10.1093/clp/58.1.235
118.
Eekelaar J. Family Law and Personal Life. Oxford University Press; 2007. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535422.001.0001
119.
Glennon L. Obligations Between Adult Partners: Moving From Form to Function? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2007;22(1):22-60. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebm017
120.
Millbank J. The role of ‘functional family’ in same-sex family recognition trends. Family Law. 2008;20(2):131-283. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_06_2.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_06_2&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_06_2
121.
Duncan S, Carter J, Phillips M, Roseneil S, Stoilova M. Legal rights for people who ‘Live Apart Together’? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2012;34(4):443-458. doi:10.1080/09649069.2012.753731
122.
Farrah Ahmed and Jane Calderwood Norton*. Religious tribunals, religious freedom, and concern for vulnerable women. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2012;24(4):363-387. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_12_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_12_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_12_1
123.
Authority and Authenticity: Sharia Councils, Muslim Women’s Rights and the English courts. Child and family law quarterly. 2013;25(2):119-136. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_06_2.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_06_2&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_06_2
124.
Family justice review: final report. Published online 2011. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/family-justice-review-final-report--2
125.
Government response to the family justice review. Published online 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-response-to-the-family-justice-review-a-system-with-children-and-families-at-its-heart
126.
Long R. Family Justice Review update: Contact and other issues for parents following separation - Commons Library Standard Note. Published online 2012. http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/briefing-papers/SN06335/family-justice-review-update-contact-and-other-issues-for-parents-following-separation
127.
Justice Ryder. Judicial Proposals for the Modernisation of Family Justice. Published online 2012. https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications/family-modernisation-final-report/
128.
A brighter future for Family Justice. Published online 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/whats-happened-since-the-family-justice-review-a-brighter-future-for-family-justice
129.
George RH. *Ideas and Debates in Family Law. Hart; 2012.
130.
Eekelaar, John. Evaluating Legal Regulation of Family Behaviour. International Journal of the Jurisprudence of the Family. 2010;1. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ijjf1&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=3&men_tab=srchresults&terms=Eekelaar,%20John&type=matchall
131.
Eekelaar J. "Not of the Highest Importance”: Family justice under threat. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2011;33(4):311-317. doi:10.1080/09649069.2011.632883
132.
A Diduck. Autonomy and Vulnerability in family law: the missing link. In: Wallbank JA, Herring J, eds. Vulnerabilities, Care and Family Law. Routledge; 2014.
133.
Eekelaar J, Maclean M. Family Justice: The Work of Family Judges in Uncertain Times. Hart Publishing; 2013.
134.
Cobb S. Legal aid reform: its impact on family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2013;35(1):3-19. doi:10.1080/09649069.2013.774607
135.
Family Law Online special issue May 2014. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_30&addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_30.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_30&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false
136.
Q v Q [2014] EWFC 31. Published online 2014. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5CVC-5321-F0JY-C2TR&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
137.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 2. In: Family Law, Gender and the State. 3rd ed. Hart; 2012.
138.
Herring J. Chapter 2. In: Family Law. Vol Longman law series. 6th ed. Pearson; 2013.
139.
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 2. In: Family Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2011.
140.
George RH. Ideas and Debates in Family Law. Hart; 2012.
141.
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. Published online 1973. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61R0-TWPY-Y1H9&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
142.
Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013. Published online 2013. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=58YH-KVW1-DYCN-C1YY&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
143.
Hudson v Leigh [2009] EWHC 1306. Published online 2009. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?oc=00240&elb=t&lni=7VYJ-BVP0-YBF6-71X9&perma=true&csi=316762&secondRedirectIndicator=true
144.
Leigh v Hudson [2009] EWCA Civ 1442. Published online 2009. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?oc=00240&elb=t&lni=7XK5-RG80-YBF6-73KP&perma=true&csi=316762&secondRedirectIndicator=true
145.
MA v JA [2012] EWHC 2219 (Fam). Published online 2012. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5676-WV21-F0JY-C46B&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
146.
Bevan C. The role of intention in non-marriage cases post Hudson v Leigh. Child and family law quarterly. 2013;25(1). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_04_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_04_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_04_5
147.
Probert, Rebecca. The Evolving Concept of Non-Marriage. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2013;(3):314-351. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq25&div=27&g_sent=1&collection=journals
148.
Gender Recognition Act 2004. Published online 2004. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61F0-TWPY-Y18X&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
149.
Sheffield City Council v E & Anor [2004] EWHC 2808 (Fam) (02 December 2004). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2004/2808.html
150.
Wilkinson v Kitzinger and others [2006] EWHC 2022 (Fam). Published online 2006. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VG31-DYBP-P0N7&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
151.
Harding R. ‘Wilkinson v Kitzinger’ (An alternative Judgment). In: Feminist Judgments: From Theory to Practice. Hart; 2010:425-430.
152.
Equal marriage consultation - Consultations - GOV.UK. Published online 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/equal-marriage-consultation
153.
R (on the application of Quila and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (on the application of Bibi and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45. Published online 2011. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=540Y-JNJ1-F0JY-C4JF&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
154.
Every Family Matters: An in-depth review of family law in Britain. Published online 2009. http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/publications/every-family-matters
155.
R (on the application of Baiai and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (on the application of Trzcinska and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53. Published online 2008. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VGC1-DYBP-P4KY&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
156.
P v R (Forced Marriage: Annulment) [2003] 1 FLR 661. Published online 2002. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661
157.
B v I [2010] 1 FLR 1721 (forced marriage as non-marriage). Published online 2010. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20101FLR1721.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20101FLR1721
158.
NS v MI [2006] EWHC 1646 (Fam), [2007] 2 FCR 748. Published online 2006. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4R46-GW00-TWP1-D108&csi=274607&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
159.
Goodwin v United Kingdom (Application 28957/95) [2002] IRLR 664, [2002] 2 FCR 577. Published online 2002. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4R47-6YT0-TWP1-D0YN&csi=274607&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
160.
Schafer, L. Marrying an in-law? The future of prohibited degrees of affinity and consanguinity in English Law. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2008;20(2):219-229. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq20&id=219&collection=journals&index=journals/chilflq
161.
Lewis, Jane. Marriage and Cohabitation and the Nature of Commitment. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 1999;11. http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq11&id=363&collection=journals
162.
Diduck A. Chapter 2. In: Law’s Families. Vol Law in context. LexisNexis; 2003.
163.
Probert R. Marriage Law and Practice in the Long Eighteenth Century: A Reassessment. Vol Cambridge studies in English legal history. Cambridge University Press; 2009.
164.
Norrie, Kenneth McK. Marriage is for Heterosexuals - May the Rest of Us Be Saved From It. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 2000;12. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq12&div=37&g_sent=1&collection=journals
165.
Marriage Act 1949. Published online 1949. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-G0K0-TWPY-Y0ND&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
166.
Anitha S, Gill A. Coercion, Consent and the Forced Marriage Debate in the UK. Feminist Legal Studies. 2009;17(2):165-184. doi:10.1007/s10691-009-9119-4
167.
A Choice by Right : The Report of the Working Group on Forced Marriage. Home Office Communications Directorate; 2000.
168.
Bellinger v Bellinger (Lord Chancellor intervening) - [2003] 2 AC 467. Published online 2003. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WN0-TXD8-60S7&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
169.
CORBETT v. CORBETT (OTHERWISE ASHLEY) - [1971] P. 83. Published online 1970. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPY0-TXD6-F09Y&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
170.
Corbett v Corbett (otherwise Ashley) - [1970] 2 All ER 33. Published online 1970. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-35T0-TWP1-60SD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
171.
THE REES CASE [1987] 2 FLR 111. Published online 1986. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111
172.
Cossey v Cossey [1991] 2 FLR 492. Published online 1991. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492
173.
SHEFFIELD AND HORSHAM v UK [1998] 2 FLR 928. Published online 1998. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928
174.
W v W (Nullity: Gender) [2001] 1 FLR 324. Published online 2001. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324
175.
Gereis v Yagoub [1997] 1 FLR 854. Published online 1997. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854
176.
Chief Adjudication Officer v Bath [2000] 1 FLR 8. Published online 2000. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008
177.
B and L v UK [2006] 1 FLR 35. Published online 2006. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035
178.
The Marriage Act 1949 (Remedial) Order 2007 No. 438. Published online 2007. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4SW7-STT0-TX08-H19V&csi=283307&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
179.
Singh v Singh [1971] P 226. Published online 1971. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPY0-TXD6-F0FK&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
180.
Hirani v Hirani [1983] 4 FLR 232. Published online 1982. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232
181.
Vervaeke v Smith (Messina and A-G intervening) [1983] 1 AC 145, [1982] 2 All ER 144. Published online 1983. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WP0-TXD8-60P2&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
182.
Hyde v Hyde and Woodmansee - [1861-73] All ER Rep 175. Published online 1866. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FPP-FDH0-TWXJ-213C&csi=279846&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
183.
Gandhi v Patel et al [2002] 1 FLR 603. Published online 2011. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603
184.
BALFOUR v. BALFOUR. - [1919] 2 K.B. 571. Published online 1919. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4F-RWJ0-TXD5-X0ST&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
185.
Eekelaar J. Marriage: a modest proposal. Family Law. 2013;83(1).
186.
Halpern et al. v. Attorney General of Canada et al. (June 10, 2003). Published online 2003. http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/decisions/2003/june/halpernC39172.htm
187.
Minister of Home Affairs and another v Fourie and another; Lesbian and Gay Equality Project and others v Minister of Home Affairs and others - (2005) 20 BHRC 368. Published online 2005. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K8Y-4HW0-TWP1-F189&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
188.
Home Affairs v Fourie [2005] ZACC 19. Published online 2005. http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2005/19.html
189.
United States v Windsor 570 US 2013. Published online 2012. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/12
190.
Auchmuty R. What’s so special about marriage? The Impact of Wilkinson v Kitzinger. Child and family law quarterly. 2008;20(4). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_12_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_12_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_12_3
191.
Tatchell P. Why our new same-sex marriage is not yet equal marriage. New statesman. Published online 19 July 2013. http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2013/07/why-our-new-same-sex-marriage-not-yet-equal-marriage
192.
Civil Partnership Act 2004. Published online 2004. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-FBY0-TWPY-Y055&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
193.
Equality Act 2010 section 202. Published online 2010. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7Y7R-3430-Y97X-73G2&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
194.
*Vallianatos v Greece (Application nos 29381/09 and 32684/09). Published online 2013. http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-128294#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-128294%22]}
195.
Bamforth N. The benefits of marriage in all but name? Same sex couples and the Civil Partnership Act 2004. Child and family law quarterly. 2007;19(2). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_06_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_06_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_06_1
196.
Stychin C. *Family Friendly?: Rights, Responsibilities and Relationship Recognition. In: Feminist Perspectives on Family Law. Routledge-Cavendish; 2006.
197.
Crompton L. The Civil Partnerships Bill 2004: The Illusion of Equality. Family law. 2004;34(12).
198.
Hale B. Homosexual Rights. Child and family law quarterly. 2004;16(2). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2004_03_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2004_03_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2004_03_1
199.
Civil Partnership: A Framework for the legal recognition of same-sex couples. Published online June 2003. https://web.archive.org/web/20030801141524/http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/research/index.htm#civilpartnerships
200.
*Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown (Overview). Published online 2006. http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm
201.
*Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown. Published online 2007. http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm
202.
Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. Published online 2004. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFS1-DYBP-P11K&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
203.
Barlow A, James G. *Regulating Marriage and Cohabitation in 21st Century Britain. Modern Law Review. 2004;67(2):143-176. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00482.x
204.
CM v STS [2008] CSOH 125 (2 September 2008). Published online 2008. http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2008CSOH125.html
205.
Miles J, Wasoff F, Mordaunt E. Reforming family law – the case of cohabitation: ‘things may not work out as you expect’. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2012;34(2):167-177. doi:10.1080/09649069.2012.718532
206.
Douglas G, Pearce J, Woodward H. Cohabitants, Property and the Law: A Study of Injustice. Modern Law Review. 2009;72(1):24-47. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00732.x
207.
Barlow A. Cohabitation, Marriage and the Law: Social Change and Legal Reform in the 21st Century. Hart; 2005.
208.
Deech R. Cohabitant. Family law. 2010;40(1). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2010_01_31.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2010_01_31&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2010_01_31
209.
Lewis, Jane. Marriage and Cohabitation and the Nature of Commitment. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 1999;11(4). http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq11&div=40&g_sent=1&collection=journals
210.
Parker S. Informal Marriage, Cohabitation and the Law, 1750-1989. Macmillan; 1990.
211.
Re J (Income Support: Cohabitation) [1995] 1 FLR 660. Published online 1995. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660
212.
Freeman MDA, Lyon CM. Cohabitation without Marriage: An Essay in Law and Social Policy. Gower; 1983.
213.
Deech R. The Case Against the Legal Recognition of Cohabitation. In: Marriage and Cohabitation in Contemporary Societies: Areas of Legal, Social and Ethical Change. Butterworths; 1980.
214.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 12. In: Family Law, Gender and the State. 3rd ed. Hart; 2012.
215.
Herring J. Chapter 6. In: Family Law. Vol Longman law series. 6th ed. Pearson; 2013.
216.
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 4. In: Family Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2011.
217.
New government domestic violence and abuse definition. Published 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/new-government-domestic-violence-and-abuse-definition
218.
Family Law Act 1996 Part IV. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61P0-TWPY-Y1F8&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
219.
Protection from Harassment Act 1997. Published online 1997. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-HC70-TWPY-Y0CJ&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
220.
Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. Published online 2004. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61F0-TWPY-Y0BK&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
221.
Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007. Published online 2007. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-HC60-TWPY-Y0KY&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
222.
Crime and Security Act 2010. Published online 2010. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7Y7B-PJM0-Y97X-74GB&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
223.
Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014. Published online 2014. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BS9-MNJ1-DYCN-C2CP&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
224.
B v B (Occupation Order) [1999] 1 FLR 715. Published online 1998. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715
225.
Chalmers v Johns [1999] 1 FLR 392. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392
226.
Mark John Smith v R [2012] EWCA Crim 2566. Published online 2012. http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2012/2566.html
227.
Burris v Azadani - [1995] 4 All ER 802. Published online 1995. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60YF&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
228.
House of Lords. R v Ireland, R v Burstow [1997] 3 WLR 534.(1997). https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I4DA7AC70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
229.
R v Hills [2001] 1 FLR 580. Published online 2000. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580
230.
Lau v Director of Public Prosecutions [2000] 1 FLR 799. Published online 2000. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799
231.
R v Colohan [2001] EWCA Crim 1251. Published online 2001. http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2001/1251.html
232.
Harris J. An Evaluation of the Use and Effectiveness of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. Published online 2000. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/hors2000.html
233.
Bowcott O. Stalking prosecutions rise by 20% under new law on harassment | Law | The Guardian. The guardian. Published online 11 September 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/sep/11/stalking-prosecutions-rise-new-law-cps-acpo-victim-support
234.
C v C [1998] Fam 70. Published online 1998. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPX0-TXD6-F1C5&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
235.
Chechi v Bashier [1999] 2 FLR 489. Published online 1999. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0489.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0489
236.
G v F (Non-Molestation Order : Jurisdiction), [2000] 2 FLR 533. Published online 2000. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20002FLR0533.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20002FLR0533
237.
P v P (Contempt of Court: Mental Capacity) [1999] 2 FLR 897. Published online 1999. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0897.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0897
238.
Banks v Banks [1999] 1 FLR 726. Published online 1999. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2Gdn5Ctm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
239.
H v O (Contempt of Court: Sentencing) [2004] EWCA Civ 1691. Published online 2004. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGtm2KJn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
240.
Burton M. Civil law remedies for domestic violence: why are applications for non-molestation orders declining? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2009;31(2):109-120. doi:10.1080/09649060903043497
241.
Dolan v Corby [2011] EWCA (Civ) 1664. Published online 2011. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GtmYmJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
242.
Richards v Richards (1983) 2 All ER 807. Published online 1983. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
243.
Kaganas, Felicity. B v B (Occupation Order) and Chalmers v Johns Occupation Orders under the Family Law Act 1996. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 1999;11(2). http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq11&id=197&collection=journals&index=journals/chilflq
244.
G v G (Occupation Order: Conduct) [2000] 2 FLR 36. Published online 2000. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGZnZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
245.
Murray v Robinson [2006] 1FLR 365. Published online 2006. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2mZn0qtmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
246.
Kazimirski et al. A. Forced marriage: prevalence and service response. Published online 2009. http://www.natcen.ac.uk/our-research/research/forced-marriage/
247.
Pearce N, Gill A. Criminalising Forced Marriage Through Stand alone Legislation: Will it Work? Family law. 2012;42(5):534-542. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_05_30.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_05_30&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_05_30
248.
*Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 3. Published online 2011. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3mZm1GJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
249.
Choudhry S, Herring J. Chapter 9. In: European Human Rights and Family Law. Hart; 2010.
250.
Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police v Van Colle [2008] UKHL 50. Published online 2008. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZnYetnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
251.
Burton M. Failing to Protect: Victims’ Rights and Police Liability. Modern Law Review. 2009;72(2):283-295. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00744.x
252.
Platt J. The Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 Part 1: Is it Working? Family law. 2008;38(7). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2008_07_53.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2008_07_53&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2008_07_53
253.
Dobash RP. Women’s Violence to Men in Intimate Relationships: Working on a Puzzle. British Journal of Criminology. 2004;44(3):324-349. doi:10.1093/bjc/azh026
254.
Finney A. Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the 2004/5 British Crime Survey Summary. Published online 2006. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/onlinepubs1.html
255.
Call to end violence against women and girls. Published online 2010. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/call-to-end-violence-against-women-and-girls
256.
Hester M. Who does what to whom? Gender and domestic violence perpetrators in English police records. European Journal of Criminology. 2013;10(5):623-637. doi:10.1177/1477370813479078
257.
Walby S, Allen J. Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey. Published online 2004. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/hors2004.html
258.
Hale v Tanner [2000] 2 FLR 879. Published online 2000. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
259.
Nwogbe v Nwogbe [2000] 2 FLR 744. Published online 2000. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
260.
Humphreys C, Thiara RK. Neither justice nor protection: women’s experiences of post‐separation violence. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2003;25(3):195-214. doi:10.1080/0964906032000145948
261.
Paradine K, Wilkinson J. A Research and Literature Review. Protection and Accountability: The Reporting, Investigation and Prosecution of Domestic Violence Cases. National Centre for Policing Excellence; 2004. http://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/cjji/inspections/violence-at-home-a-joint-thematic-inspection-of-the-investigation-and-prosecution-of-cases-involving-domestic-violence/#.VSaKF_A71wA
262.
Dobash RE, Dobash RP. The Politics and Policies of Responding to Violence Against Women. In: Home Truths about Domestic Violence: Feminist Influences on Policy and Practice : A Reader. Routledge; 2000.
263.
Law’s Progressive Potential: The Value of Engagement with the Law for Domestic Violence. Social & Legal Studies. 2001;10(1):105-130. http://sls.sagepub.com/content/10/1/105.abstract
264.
Great Britain. The Law Commission (Law Com. No. 207). Family Law: Domestic Violence and Occupation of the Family Home. House of Commons?]; 1992. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:hcpp&rft_dat=xri:hcpp:rec:1992-091023
265.
Freeman M. Legal Ideologies; patriarchal precedents and domestic violence. In: The State, the Law, and the Family. Vol Social science paperback. Tavistock; 1984.
266.
Hayes M. Non-Molestation Protection: Only Associated Persons Need Apply. Family law. 1996;26.
267.
Itzin C. Gendering Domestic Violence: The Influence of Feminsim on Policy and Practice. In: Home Truths about Domestic Violence: Feminist Influences on Policy and Practice : A Reader. Routledge; 2000.
268.
Strengthening the law on domestic abuse - Consultations - Summary of responses. Published online 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/strengthening-the-law-on-domestic-abuse
269.
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 ss 1 – 10A. Published online 1973. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmJmZKJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
270.
Civil Partnership Act 2004 ss 44 - 48. Published online 2004. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidn3KJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
271.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 3. In: Family Law, Gender and the State. 3rd ed. Hart; 2012.
272.
Herring J. Chapter 3. In: Family Law. Vol Longman law series. 6th ed. Pearson; 2013.
273.
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 5. In: Family Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2011.
274.
Pheasant v Pheasant [1972] 1 All ER 587. Published online 1972. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
275.
Buffery v Buffery [1988] 2 FLR 365. Published online 1987. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
276.
Cleary v Cleary [1974] 1 All ER 498. Published online 1974. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm2CJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
277.
Carr v Carr [1974] 1 All ER 1193. Published online 1974. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm4GdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
278.
Ash v Ash [1972] 1 All ER 582. Published online 1972. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
279.
Pheasant v Pheasant [1972] 1 All ER 587. Published online 1972. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
280.
Thurlow v Thurlow [1975] 2 All ER 979. Published online 1975. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmXqZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
281.
Bradley v Bradley [1973] 3 All ER 750. Published online 1973. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udnYCdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
282.
Buffery v Buffery [1988] 2 FLR 365. Published online 1987. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
283.
Livingstone-Stollard v Livingstone-Stollard [1974] Fam 47. Published online 1974. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm1qdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
284.
Butterworth v Butterworth [1997] 2 FLR 336. Published online 1997. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtm4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
285.
Birch v Birch [1992] 1 FLR 564. Published online 1992. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
286.
Perry v Perry [1963] 3 All ER 766. Published online 1963. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udo0mZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
287.
Glenister v Glenister [1945] P 30. Published online 1945. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CdnXCZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha/glenister-v-glenister
288.
Dunn v Dunn [1967] P 217. Published online 1967. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZn5uJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
289.
Stringfellow v Stringfellow [1976] 2 All ER 539. Published online 1976. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmWiZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
290.
Pardy v Pardy [1939] P 288. Published online 1939. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2Ctn2CZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
291.
Slawson v Slawson [1942] 2 All ER 527. Published online 1942. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGdn3iZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
292.
Santos v Santos [1972] 2 All ER 246. Published online 1972. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0GdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
293.
Mouncer v Mouncer [ 1972] 1 All ER 289. Published online 1972. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn1CJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
294.
Parker v Parker [1972] 1 All ER 410. Published online 1972. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0iZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
295.
Rukat v Rukat [1975] 1 All ER 343. Published online 1974. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmYatmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
296.
Grenfell v Grenfell [1978] Fam 128. Published online 1977. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJm1eJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
297.
Archer v Archer [ 1999] 1 FLR 327. Published online 1998. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYydmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
298.
K v K (Financial relief: Widow’s Pension) [1997] 1 FLR 35. Published online 1997. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidm4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
299.
Wickler v Wickler [1998] 2 FLR 326. Published online 1998. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
300.
Douglas et al. G. The Role of Religious Tribunals in Regulating Marriage and Divorce. Child and family law quarterly. 2012;24(2):139-157. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_02_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_02_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_02_1
301.
Douglas et al G. Accommodating Religious Divorce in the Secular State: A Case-Study Analysis. In: Families: Deviance, Diversity and the Law. Hart Publishing; 2013:185-201.
302.
Sandberg R, Douglas G, Doe N, Gilliat-Ray S, Khan A. Britain’s Religious Tribunals: ‘Joint Governance’ in Practice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2013;33(2):263-291. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqs031
303.
Diduck A. *Chapter 3. In: Law’s Families. Vol Law in context. LexisNexis; 2003.
304.
Reece H. Divorcing Responsibly. Hart; 2003.
305.
Looking to the future: mediation and the ground for divorce the Government’s proposals - Publications - GOV.UK. Published online 1995. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/looking-to-the-future-mediation-and-the-ground-for-divorce-the-governments-proposals
306.
Family Law Act 1996. Published online 1996. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYiZnXqdm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
307.
Supporting Families: A consultation document. Published online 1998. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ERORecords/HO/421/2/P2/ACU/SUPPFAM.HTM
308.
Eekelaar J. Family Justice: Ideal or Illusion?: Family Law and Communitarian Values. Current Legal Problems. 1995;48(Part 2):191-216. doi:10.1093/clp/48.Part_2.191
309.
Cretney S. Divorce Reform in England: Humbug and Hypocrisy or a Smooth Transition? In: Divorce: Where Next?. Vol Issues in law and society. Dartmouth Pub. Co; 1996.
310.
Deech R. *Divorce – A Disaster? Family law. 2009;39(11). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_11_48.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_11_48&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_11_48
311.
Smart C, Neale B. *Good enough morality? Divorce and postmodernity. Critical Social Policy. 1997;17(53):3-27. doi:10.1177/026101839701705301
312.
Dewar J. *The Normal Chaos of Family Law. Modern Law Review. 1998;61(4):467-485. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00157
313.
Sclater SD, Piper C. *The Family Law Act 1996 in Context. In: Undercurrents of Divorce. Ashgate; 1999.
314.
Douglas et al. G. Supporting Children when Parents Separate - A Neglected Family Justice or Mental Health Issue? Child and family law quarterly. 1996;8(2). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1996_02_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1996_02_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1996_02_3
315.
Sclater SD. *Narratives of divorce. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 1997;19(4):423-441. doi:10.1080/09649069708410209
316.
Sclater SD. Divorce: A Psychosocial Study. Ashgate; 1999.
317.
Sclater SD, Brown J. Divorce: A Psychodynamic Perspective. In: Undercurrents of Divorce. Ashgate; 1999.
318.
Sclater SD. Experiences of Divorce. In: Undercurrents of Divorce. Ashgate; 1999.
319.
Collier R. The Dashing of a ‘Liberal Dream’? - The Information Meeting, The ‘New Family’ and the Limits of Law. Child and family law quarterly. 1999;11(3). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_03_4.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_03_4&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_03_4
320.
Eekelaar J. *Family Law: Keeping us ‘On Message’. Child and family law quarterly. 1999;11(4). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_04_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_04_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_04_5
321.
Sclater SD, Piper C. *Re-moralising the Family? – Family Policy, Family Law and Youth Justice. Child and family law quarterly. 2000;12(2). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_02_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_02_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_02_3
322.
Reece H. *Divorcing Responsibly. Feminist Legal Studies. 2000;8(1):65-91. doi:10.1023/A:1009283815775
323.
Reece H. Divorcing the Children. In: Feminist Perspectives on Child Law. Vol Feminist perspectives in law. Cavendish; 2000.
324.
Eekelaar J, Beinart S, Maclean M. Family Lawyers: The Divorce Work of Solicitors. Hart; 2000.
325.
Walker et al. J. Picking up the Pieces: Marriage and Divorce: Two years after Information Provision. Published online 2004. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dca.gov.uk/pubs/reports/family2004-webpageintro.htm
326.
Responses to Civil Partnership: A framework for the legal recognition of same-sex couples. Published online 2003. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20040105034450/http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/research/index.htm#cp_responses
327.
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. Published online 1973. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmJmZKJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
328.
Civil Partnership Act 2004. Published online 2004. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidn3KJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
329.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 7. In: Family Law, Gender and the State. 3rd ed. Hart; 2012.
330.
Herring J. Chapter 5. In: Family Law. Vol Longman law series. 6th ed. Pearson; 2013.
331.
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 7. In: Family Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2011.
332.
White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981. Published online 2000. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white
333.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. Published online 2006. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
334.
Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503. Published online 2007. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdnYuto2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
335.
Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements - Law Commission. Published online 2014. http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/publications/matrimonial-property.htm
336.
Suter v Suter [1987] 2 FLR 232. Published online 1986. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
337.
Re A [1998] 1 FLR 347. Published online 1998. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
338.
*B v B (Financial Provision Welfare of Child and Conduct) [2002] 1 FLR 555. Published online 2002. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
339.
Prest v Petrodel Resources and others [2013] UKSC 34. Published online 2013. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5yJn5itm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
340.
George R. Family finances and the corporate veil: Prest v Petrodel. Family Law. 2013;43(8). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_08_61.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_08_61&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_08_61
341.
Sharland v Sharland [2014] EWCA 95. Published online 2014. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5GJm5adn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
342.
Delaney v Delaney [1990] 2 FLR 457. Published online 1990. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457
343.
Leadbeater v Leadbeater [1985] FLR 789. Published online 1985. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo1mJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
344.
P v P (Divorce: Financial Provision Clean Break) [2002] EWCA Civ 1886; [2003] 1 FLR 942. Published online 2002. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZiJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/parra-v-parra
345.
N v F [2011] EWHC 586 (pre-acquired wealth). Published online 2011. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3udoWqJm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
346.
*Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41. Published online 2011. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3mZm3ytmYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/jones-v-jones
347.
Y v Y (financial orders inherited wealth) [2012] EWHC Fam 2063. Published online 2012. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uJn3mdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
348.
SK v WL (post separation accrual] [2011] 1 FLR 1471. Published online 2011. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3uZm1qJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
349.
*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. Published online 2006. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
350.
*Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503. Published online 2007. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdnYuto2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
351.
Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171. Published online 2010. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3itm3GtoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/robson-v-robson
352.
K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550. Published online 2011. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3eJn2udo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
353.
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707. Published online 2008. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
354.
North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760. Published online 2007. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZaJm1Kto1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
355.
Dart v Dart [1996] 2 FLR 286. Published online 1996. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYetn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
356.
P v P (Inherited property) [2004] EWHC 1364; [2005] 1 FLR 576. Published online 2004. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm3yZm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
357.
Grey v Grey [2009] EWCA Civ 1424. Published online 2009. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3aJm3Ctn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
358.
SA v PA [2014] EWCA 392. Published online 2014. http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXatmZuZmXqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
359.
H v H [2014] EWHC 760. Published online 2014. http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXadm3uJmWedlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
360.
White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981. Published online 2000. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white
361.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. Published online 2006. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
362.
Preston v Preston (1982) Fam 17. Published online 1982. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXiZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
363.
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707. Published online 2008. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
364.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. Published online 2006. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
365.
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707. Published online 2008. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
366.
White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981. Published online 2000. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white
367.
*C v C (Financial Relief: Short Marriage) [1997] 2 FLR 26. Published online 1997. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYitoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
368.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. Published online 2006. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
369.
*White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981. Published online 2000. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white
370.
*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. Published online 2006. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
371.
B v B (Mesher Order) [2002] EWHC 3106 (Fam); [2003] 2 FLR 285. Published online 2002. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm1eZn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
372.
*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. Published online 2006. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
373.
Wachtel v Wachtel [1973] Fam 72. Published online 1973. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm5GJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
374.
K v L [2010] EWCA Civ 125 (Child sexual abuse). Published online 2010. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qdn3CdoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
375.
Vaughn v Vaughn (financial misconduct) [2007] EWCA Civ 1085. Published online 2007. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZado0adn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
376.
K v K [1990] 2 FLR 225. Published online 1990. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXeZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
377.
Clark v Clark [1999] 2 FLR 498. Published online 1999. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCJm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
378.
Kokosinski v Kokosinski [1980] 1 All ER 1106. Published online 1980. http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo0edlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
379.
H v H (Financial Relief: Attempted Murder as Conduct) [2006] 1 FLR 990. Published online 2006. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCZm5mtnWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
380.
T v T (Financial relief: Pensions) [1998] 1 FLR 1072. Published online 1998. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYqZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
381.
C v C (Financial Relief: Short Marriage) [1997] 2 FLR 26. Published online 1997. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYitoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
382.
Suter v Suter [1987] 2 All ER 336. Published online 1987. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
383.
Mawson v Mawson [1994] 2 FLR 985. Published online 1994. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXCto1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
384.
K v K (Ancillary Relief: Prenuptial Agreement) [2003] 1 FLR 120. Published online 2003. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZitm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
385.
K v K (Periodical Payment: Cohabitation) [2006] 2 FLR 468. Published online 2006. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn2iZm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
386.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. Published online 2006. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
387.
Martin v Martin [1978] Fam 12. Published online 1977. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn4Gto4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
388.
Clutton v Clutton [1991] 1 All ER 340. Published online 1991. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXetoZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
389.
Mesher v Mesher and Hall [1980] 1 All ER 126. Published online 1980. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCZn1adoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
390.
Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360. Published online 1999. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uZmWGZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/piglowski-v-piglowski
391.
B v B (Mesher Order) [2002] EWHC 3106 (Fam); [2003] 2 FLR 285. Published online 2002. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm1eZn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
392.
Richardson v Richardson [1978] 9 Fam Law 86. Published online 1978. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZidm4Ctn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
393.
T v T (Financial relief: Pensions) [1998] 1 FLR 1072. Published online 1998. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYqZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
394.
S v S [2002] 1 FLR 457. Published online 2002. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZedm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/s-v-s-rescission-of-decree-nisi-pension-sharing-provision
395.
Do Divorced Women Catch Up in Pension Building? Child and family law quarterly. 2002;14(2). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2002_02_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2002_02_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2002_02_3
396.
PRICE D. Closing the Gender Gap in Retirement Income: What Difference Will Recent UK Pension Reforms Make? Journal of Social Policy. 2007;36(04). doi:10.1017/S0047279407001183
397.
Price D. Pension Accumulation and Gendered Household Structures. In: Sharing Lives, Dividing Assets: An Inter-Disciplinary Study. Hart Pub; 2009. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847315274
398.
Xydias v Xydias [1999] 1 FLR 683 – general policy. Published online 1999. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYyZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
399.
Soulsbury v Soulsbury [2007] EWCA Civ 969. Published online 2007. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXytm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
400.
Edgar v Edgar [1980] 1 WLR 1410. Published online 1980. http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
401.
MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64. Published online 2009. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido0mJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/macleod-v-macleod
402.
Crossley v Crossley [2007] EWCA Civ 1491. Published online 2007. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetn5Cto4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
403.
*Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA 649. Published online 2010. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZn4adn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
404.
Z v Z (No 2) [2011] EWHC 2878. Published online 2011. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qdn2udm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
405.
B v S [2012] EWHC 265. Published online 2012. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4aJnXKZn3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
406.
V v V [2011] EWHC 3230. Published online 2011. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GZmYKdo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
407.
SA v PA (pre-marital agreement) [2014] EWCA 392. Published online 2014. http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXatmZuZmXqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
408.
Pavlou P. Pre-Nuptial Agreements – Back Where we Were? Kremen v Agrest. Family law. 2012;42(8). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_08_40.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_08_40&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_08_40
409.
Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17. Published online 2007. http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2mZn0itnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha/stack-v-dowden
410.
Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53. Published online 2011. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2GdnZuto0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
411.
Consultation Paper No 179: Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown (Overview). Published online 2006. http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm
412.
Supplementary Consultation Paper Matrimonial Property,Needs and Agreements. Published online 2012. http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/consultations/matrimonial_property.htm
413.
*V v V [2011] EWHC 3230. Published online 2011. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GZmYKdo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
414.
McFarlane v McFarlane (no 2) [2009] EWHC 891. Published online 2009. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CdoXGJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
415.
GW v RW (Financial provision: Departure From Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108. Published online 2003. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCto3CdoZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
416.
MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64. Published online 2009. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido0mJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/macleod-v-macleod
417.
Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA 649. Published online 2010. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZn4adn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
418.
H v H [2007] EWHC 459 (Fam). Published online 2007. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKtn4ytn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
419.
S v S [2007] EWHC 1975 (Fam). Published online 2007. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCJnXeJn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
420.
B v B [2008] EWCA Civ 543. Published online 2008. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXmZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/b-v-b-ancillary-relief-distribution-of-assets
421.
VB v JP [ 2008] EWHC 112. Published online 2008. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZeJn1qdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
422.
Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360. Published online 1999. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uZmWGZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/piglowski-v-piglowski
423.
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707. Published online 2008. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
424.
Myerson v. Myerson (2009) 1 FLR 826. Published online 2009. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido1iZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
425.
Miles J. *Charman v Charman: making sense of need, compensation and equal sharing after Miller/McFarlane. Child and family law quarterly. 2008;20(3). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_03_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_03_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_03_5
426.
Diduck A. *Ancillary Relief: Complicating the Search for Principle. Journal of Law and Society. 2011;38(2):272-300. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2011.00543.x
427.
Leech S, Young R. Marriage, divorce and ancillary relief under the Human Rights Act 1998: an introduction. In: European Human Rights Law Review. ; 2001:300-311. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I8497AF10E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
428.
Douglas G, Perry A. How parents cope financially on separation and divorce- implications for the future of ancillary relief. Child and family law quarterly. 2001;13(1). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2001_01_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2001_01_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2001_01_5
429.
Eekelaar J. Back to Basics and Forward into the Unknown. Family law. 2001;31(1). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_27.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_27&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_27
430.
Diduck A. Fairness and Justice for All? The House of Lords in White v. White [2000] 2 F.L.R. 981. Feminist Legal Studies. 2001;9(2):173-183. doi:10.1023/A:1016744705288
431.
Diduck A. Chapter 6. In: Law’s Families. Vol Law in context. LexisNexis; 2003.
432.
Cretney S. The Family and the Law – Status or Contract? Child and family law quarterly. 2003;15(4). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2003_04_6.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2003_04_6&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2003_04_6
433.
Edwards S. Division of Assets and Fairness - `Brick Lane’ – Gender, Culture and Ancillary Relief on Divorce. Family law. 2004;34(11).
434.
Eekelaar J. Asset distribution on divorce - the durational element. Law quarterly review. 2001;117(Oct). https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I79FFBD40E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
435.
Eekelaar J. Asset Distribution on Divorce – Time and Property. Family law. 2003;33(11). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2003_11_29.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2003_11_29&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2003_11_29
436.
Herring J. Why Financial Orders on Divorce should be Unfair. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2005;19(2):218-228. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebi016
437.
Symes P. INDISSOLUBILITY AND THE CLEAN BREAK. The Modern Law Review. 1985;48(1):44-60. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1985.tb00825.x
438.
John Eekelaar. Equality and the Purpose of Maintenance. Journal of Law and Society. 1988;15(2):188-200. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410053?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
439.
Diduck A, Orton H. Equality and Support for Spouses. The Modern Law Review. 1994;57(5):681-702. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1994.tb01969.x
440.
Diduck A. *What is Family Law For? Current Legal Problems. 2011;64(1):287-314. doi:10.1093/clp/cur010
441.
Hale B. *Equality and autonomy in family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2011;33(1):3-14. doi:10.1080/09649069.2011.571466
442.
Thorpe M. London- The Divorce Capital of the World. Family law. 2009;39(1). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_01_24.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_01_24&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_01_24
443.
Deech R. What’s a Woman Worth? Family law. 2009;39(12). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_12_27.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_12_27&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_12_27
444.
Ferguson L. *Family, Social Inequalities, and the Persuasive Force of Interpersonal Obligation. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2007;22(1):61-90. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebm015
445.
Glennon L. *The limitations of equality discourses on the contours of intimate relations. In: Rights, Gender and Family Law. Routledge; 2010.
446.
Hitchings E. *Chaos or Consistency? Ancillary Relief in the ‘Everyday’ Case. In: Sharing Lives, Dividing Assets: An Inter-Disciplinary Study. Hart Pub; 2009. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847315274
447.
Ouazzani S. Prenuptial agreements: the implications of gender. Family law. 2013;43(4). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_04_56.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_04_56&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_04_56
448.
Herring J. Chapter 5. In: Family Law. Vol Longman law series. 6th ed. Pearson; 2013.
449.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 7. In: Family Law, Gender and the State. 3rd ed. Hart; 2012.
450.
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 6. In: Family Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press; 2011.
451.
Supporting Separated Families, Securing Children’s Futures: A Public Consultation Document. Published online 2012. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/supporting-separated-families-securing-children-s-futures
452.
Government response to the consultation: Supporting separated families: securing children’s futures. Published online 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/supporting-separated-families-securing-children-s-futures
453.
Douglas et al. G. Contact is not a Commodity to be Bartered for Money. Family law. 2011;41(5). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2011_05_44.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2011_05_44&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2011_05_44
454.
R. (on the application of Kehoe) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 48; [2004] EWCA Civ 225; [2004] 1 FLR 1132 (on enforcement). Published online 2005. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZmtm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
455.
R (Rowley and others) v Sec State for Work and Pensions [ 2007] EWCA Civ 598. Published online 2007. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZatn5yto3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
456.
T v B [2010] EWHC 1444 (Fam). Published online 2010. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3idmZitn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
457.
Re A (child of the Family) [1998] 1 FLR 347. Published online 1998. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
458.
Re C (A Minor) (child Support Agency: Disclosure) [1995] 1 FLR 201. Published online 1995. http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJn0CdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
459.
Re E (A Minor) (child Support: Blood Test) [1994] 2 FLR 548. Published online 1994. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXCdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
460.
J v C (Child: Financial Provision) [1999] 1 FLR 152. Published online 1999. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudo1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
461.
Re P (A Child) (Financial provision) [2003] 2 FLR 865. Published online 2003. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo1uZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
462.
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Jones [2004] 1 FLR. 282. Published online 2003. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm4Ktn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
463.
Treharne v. Sec of State for W&P [2009] 1 FLR 853. Published online 2008. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido5mZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
464.
Brookes v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 420. Published online 2010. http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2KZn1iZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
465.
Bryson C, Ellman IM, McKay S, Miles J. Child Maintenance: How Much Should the State Require Fathers to Pay When Families Separate? Published online 2013. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2321788
466.
Skinner C. Child Maintenance Reforms: Understanding Fathers’ Expressive Agency and the Power of Reciprocity. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2013;27(2):242-265. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebt005
467.
Strengthening Families, Promoting Parental Responsibility: the future of child maintenance Cm 7990. Published online 2011. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/strengthening-families-promoting-parental-responsibility-the-future-of-child-maintenance
468.
Henshaw D. Recovering Child Support: routes to responsibility. Published online 2006. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/recovering-child-support-routes-to-responsibility
469.
Diduck A. Chapter 7. In: Law’s Families. Vol Law in context. LexisNexis; 2003.
470.
Wikeley N. Private Cases and the Child Support Agency. Family law. 2001;31(1). http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?c=t&action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_28.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_28&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_28
471.
Collier R. The Campaign Against the Child Support Act: ‘Errant Fathers and Family Men’. Family law. 1994;24:384-387.
472.
Alison Diduck. The Unmodified Family: The Child Support Act and the Construction of Legal Subjects. Journal of Law and Society. 1995;22(4):527-548. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410613?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
473.
MACLEAN M, EEKELAAR J. CHILD SUPPORT: THE BRITISH SOLUTION. ‘International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family’. 1993;7(2):205-229. doi:10.1093/lawfam/7.2.205
474.
Altman S. A Theory of Child Support. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2003;17(2):173-210. doi:10.1093/lawfam/17.2.173
