1
Oldham M. Blackstone’s statutes on family law 2014-2015. 23rd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2014.
2
Herring J. Family law. 6th ed. Harlow: : Pearson 2013.
3
Lowe NV, Douglas G, Bromley PM. Bromley’s family law. 10th ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
4
Masson JM, Bailey-Harris RJ, Probert R, et al. Cretney principles of family law. 8th ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2008.
5
Diduck A. Law’s families. London: : LexisNexis 2003.
6
George RH. Ideas and debates in family law. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
7
Herring J, Probert R, Gilmore S. Great debates in family law. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012.
8
Choudhry S, Herring J. European human rights and family law. Oxford: : Hart 2010.
9
Gilmore S, Herring J, Probert R. Landmark cases in family law. Oxford: : Hart 2011.
10
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Family law, gender and the state. 3rd ed. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
11
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Family law: text, cases, and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
12
Hale B. The family, law & society. 6th ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009.
13
Archard D. Children: Rights and Childhood. 2nd ed. Hoboken: : Taylor and Francis 2004. http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=199397
14
Archard D. Children, family, and the state. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2003.
15
Bainham A. Children and their families: contact, rights and welfare. Oxford: : Hart 2003.
16
Barker N. Not the marrying kind: a feminist critique of same-sex marriage. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2012.
17
Barlow A. Cohabitation, marriage and the law: social change and legal reform in the 21st century. Oxford: : Hart 2005.
18
Bernstein A. Marriage proposals: questioning a legal status. New York: : New York University Press 2006.
19
Bradley D. Family law and political culture: (Scandinavian laws in comparative perspective). London: : Sweet & Maxwell 1996.
20
Monk D, Bridgeman J. Feminist perspectives on child law. London: : Cavendish 2000.
21
Bridgeman J, Lind C, Keating HM. Responsibility, law and the family. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2008.
22
Bridgeman J, Keating HM, Lind C. Regulating family responsibilities. Farnham: : Ashgate 2011.
23
Burton M. Legal responses to domestic violence. London: : Routledge-Cavendish 2008.
24
Carling AH, Duncan S, Edwards R. Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. London: : Routledge 2002.
25
Collier R, Sheldon S. Fragmenting fatherhood: a socio-legal study. Oxford: : Hart 2008.
26
Cretney S. Family Law in the Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press 2005. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280919.001.0001
27
Sclater SD. Divorce: a psychosocial study. Aldershot, Hants, England: : Ashgate 1999.
28
Piper C, Sclater SD. Undercurrents of divorce. Aldershot, England: : Ashgate 1999.
29
Diduck A. Marriage and cohabitation. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2008.
30
Diduck A, O’Donovan K. Feminist perspectives on family law. Abingdon: : Routledge-Cavendish 2006.
31
Dobash RE, Cavanagh K. Changing violent men. Thousand Oaks, Calif: : Sage Publications 2000.
32
Donzelot J, Hurley R. The policing of families. London: : Hutchinson
33
Lowe NV, Douglas G. The continuing evolution of family law. Bristol: : Family Law 2009.
34
Eekelaar J. Family Law and Personal Life. Oxford University Press 2007. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535422.001.0001
35
Eekelaar J, Maclean M. Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2013.
36
Eskridge WN. Equality practice: civil unions and the future of gay rights. New York: : Routledge 2002.
37
Finch J, Mason J. Negotiating family responsibilities. Routledge 1992.
38
Fineman M. The illusion of equality: the rhetoric and reality of divorce reform. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1991.
39
Fineman M. The neutered mother, the sexual family, and other twentieth century tragedies. New York: : Routledge 1995.
40
Fineman M. The autonomy myth: a theory of dependency. New York: : New Press 2004.
41
Fortin J. Children’s rights and the developing law. 3rd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009.
42
Freeman MDA. The moral status of children: essays on the rights of the child. Boston: : Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1997.
43
Goldstein J. The best interests of the child: the least detrimental alternative. New York: : Free Press 1996.
44
Hale B, Hamlyn Trust. From the test tube to the coffin: choice and regulation in private life. London: : Stevens & Sons/Sweet & Maxwell 1996.
45
Heaphy B, Smart C, Einarsdottir A. Same sex marriages: new generations, new relationships. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2013.
46
Herring J. Caring and the law. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2013.
47
Heinze E. Of innocence and autonomy: children, sex and human rights. Aldershot, Hants, England: : Dartmouth 2000.
48
King M. A better world for children?: explorations in morality and authority. New York: : Routledge 1997.
49
Lee N. Childhood and society: growing up in an age of uncertainty. Maidenhead: : Open University 2001.
50
Maclean M, Eekelaar J. The parental obligation: a study of parenthood across households. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 1997.
51
Maclean M, Eekelaar J. Family law advocacy: how barristers help the victims of family failure. Oxford: : Hart 2009.
52
Eekelaar J, Maclean M. Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2013.
53
Maclean M, Eekelaar J. Managing family justice in diverse societies. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2013.
54
Maclean M. Parenting after partnering: containing conflict after separation. Oxford: : Hart Pub 2007.
55
Dempsey MM. Prosecuting domestic violence: a philosophical analysis. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562169.001.1
56
Miles J, Probert R. Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study. Oxford: : Hart Pub 2009. https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/sharing-lives-dividing-assets-an-inter-disciplinary-study/
57
Morgan DHJ. Family connections: an introduction to family studies. Cambridge, UK: : Polity Press 1996.
58
Morgan DHJ. Rethinking family practices. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2011.
59
Mount F. The subversive family: an alternative history of love and marriage. London: : Unwin 1982.
60
Mullender A, Morley R. Children living with domestic violence: putting men’s abuse of women on the child care agenda. London: : Whiting & Birch 1994.
61
O’Donovan K. Sexual divisions in law. London: : Weidenfeld and Nicolson 1985.
62
O’Donovan K. Family law matters. London: : Pluto Press 1993.
63
Okin SM. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: : Basic Books 1989.
64
Pahl J. Money and marriage. Basingstoke: : Macmillan Education 1989.
65
Parker S. Informal marriage, cohabitation and the law, 1750-1989. London: : Macmillan 1990.
66
Parton N. The politics of child abuse. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1985.
67
Pateman C. The sexual contract. Cambridge: : Polity 1988.
68
Piper C. The responsible parent: a study of divorce mediation. New York: : Harvester Wheatsheaf 1993.
69
Pizzey E, Forbes A. Scream quietly or the neighbours will hear. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 1974.
70
Probert R. Family life and the law: under one roof. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2007.
71
Probert R. Marriage law and practice in the long eighteenth century: a reassessment. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009.
72
Probert R, Barton C, Cretney SM. Fifty years in family law: essays for Stephen Cretney. Cambridge: : Intersentia 2012.
73
Probert R. The changing legal regulation of cohabitation: from fornicators to family, 1600-2010. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
74
Reece H. Divorcing responsibly. Oxford: : Hart 2003.
75
Regan MC. Family law and the pursuit of intimacy. New York: : New York University Press 1993.
76
Rodger JJ. Family life and social control: a sociological perspective. Basingstoke: : Macmillan 1996.
77
Sarat A, Felstiner WLF. Divorce lawyers and their clients: power and meaning in the legal process. New York: : Oxford University Press 1995.
78
Shanley ML. Just marriage. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2004.
79
Silva EB, Smart C. The new family? London: : Sage 1999.
80
Smart C. Personal life: new directions in sociological thinking. Cambridge: : Polity 2007.
81
Smart C. The ties that bind: law, marriage and the reproduction of patriarchal relations. London: : Routledge & Kegan Paul 1984.
82
Smart C. Feminism and the power of law. London: : Routledge 1989.
83
Smart C, Neale B. Family fragments? Cambridge: : Polity Press 1999.
84
Smart C, Neale B, Wade A. The changing experience of childhood: families and divorce. Cambridge: : Polity 2001.
85
Spencer JR, Bois-Pedain A de. Freedom and responsibility in reproductive choice. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2006.
86
Stark E. Coercive control: the entrapment of women in personal life. New York: : Oxford University Press 2007.
87
Wallbank JA, Choudhry S, Herring J. Rights, gender and family law. Abingdon: : Routledge 2010.
88
Wallerstein JS, Kelly JB. Surviving the breakup: how children and parents cope with divorce. London: : Grant McIntyre 1980.
89
Wallerstein JS, Blakeslee S. Second chances. London: : Bantam 1989.
90
Weitzman LJ. The divorce revolution: the unexpected social and economic consequences for women and children in America. 1st Free Press paperback ed. New York: : Free Press 1987.
91
Wikeley N. Child support: law and policy. Oxford: : Hart 2006.
92
International journal of law, policy and the family.
94
Child and family law quarterly.
95
The Journal of social welfare & family law.
97
Children’s Legal Centre (London, England). Childright. 1983.
98
The International Journal of Children’s Rights » Brill Online. http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/15718182
99
International Family Law.
100
Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd - [2001] 1 AC 27. Published Online First: 1999.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WH0-TXD8-61G7&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
101
Vallianatos and others v Greece (App. nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09) - [2013] ECHR 29381/09. Published Online First: 2013.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BXR-HSG1-DYBP-X29X&csi=274793&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
102
SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA - 30141/04 [2010] ECHR 995 (24 June 2010). http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/995.html
103
Diduck A, Kaganas F. *Chapter 1. In: Family law, gender and the state. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
104
Herring J. *Chapter 1. In: Family law. Harlow: : Pearson 2013.
105
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 1. In: Family law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
106
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v M. Published Online First: 2006.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFV1-DYBP-P1PV&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
107
Diduck A, Kaganas F. *Chapter 5. In: Family law, gender and the state. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
108
Green Paper on the Family. http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/publications/green-paper-on-the-family
109
JDiduck A. A Family by any other Name ... or StarbucksTM comes to England. Journal of Law and Society 2001;28:290–310. doi:10.1111/1467-6478.00190
110
Bridgeman J, Lind C, Keating HM. Responsibility, law and the family. Aldershot: : Ashgate 2008.
111
Silva EB, Smart C. The new family? London: : Sage 1999.
112
Dewar J. The Normal Chaos of Family Law. Modern Law Review 1998;61:467–85. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00157
113
Dewar J. Family law and its discontents. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2000;14:59–85. doi:10.1093/lawfam/14.1.59
114
Fineman M. The neutered mother, the sexual family, and other twentieth century tragedies. New York: : Routledge 1995.
115
Weeks, J. Elective Families: lesbian and gay life experiments. In: Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. London: : Routledge 2002.
116
Carling AH, Duncan S, Edwards R. Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. London: : Routledge 2002.
117
Diduck A. Shifting Familiarity. Current Legal Problems 2005;58:235–54. doi:10.1093/clp/58.1.235
118
Eekelaar J. Family Law and Personal Life. Oxford University Press 2007. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535422.001.0001
119
Glennon L. Obligations Between Adult Partners: Moving From Form to Function? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2007;22:22–60. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebm017
120
Millbank J. The role of ‘functional family’ in same-sex family recognition trends. Family Law 2008;20:131–283.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_06_2.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_06_2&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_06_2
121
Duncan S, Carter J, Phillips M, et al. Legal rights for people who ‘Live Apart Together’? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2012;34:443–58. doi:10.1080/09649069.2012.753731
122
Farrah Ahmed and Jane Calderwood Norton*. Religious tribunals, religious freedom, and concern for vulnerable women. Child and Family Law Quarterly 2012;24:363–87.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_12_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_12_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_12_1
123
Authority and Authenticity: Sharia Councils, Muslim Women’s Rights and the English courts. Child and family law quarterly 2013;25:119–36.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_06_2.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_06_2&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_06_2
124
Family justice review: final report. 2011.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/family-justice-review-final-report--2
125
Government response to the family justice review. 2012.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-response-to-the-family-justice-review-a-system-with-children-and-families-at-its-heart
126
Long R. Family Justice Review update: Contact and other issues for parents following separation - Commons Library Standard Note. 2012.http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/briefing-papers/SN06335/family-justice-review-update-contact-and-other-issues-for-parents-following-separation
127
Justice Ryder. Judicial Proposals for the Modernisation of Family Justice. 2012.https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications/family-modernisation-final-report/
128
A brighter future for Family Justice. 2014.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/whats-happened-since-the-family-justice-review-a-brighter-future-for-family-justice
129
George RH. *Ideas and debates in family law. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
130
Eekelaar, John. Evaluating Legal Regulation of Family Behaviour. International Journal of the Jurisprudence of the Family 2010;1.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ijjf1&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=3&men_tab=srchresults&terms=Eekelaar,%20John&type=matchall
131
Eekelaar J. "Not of the Highest Importance”: Family justice under threat. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2011;33:311–7. doi:10.1080/09649069.2011.632883
132
A Diduck. Autonomy and Vulnerability in family law: the missing link. In: Wallbank JA, Herring J, eds. Vulnerabilities, care and family law. Abingdon, Oxon: : Routledge 2014.
133
Eekelaar J, Maclean M. Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2013.
134
Cobb S. Legal aid reform: its impact on family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2013;35:3–19. doi:10.1080/09649069.2013.774607
135
Family Law Online special issue May 2014. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_30&addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_30.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_30&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false
136
Q v Q [2014] EWFC 31. 2014.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5CVC-5321-F0JY-C2TR&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
137
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 2. In: Family law, gender and the state. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
138
Herring J. Chapter 2. In: Family law. Harlow: : Pearson 2013.
139
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 2. In: Family law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
140
George RH. Ideas and debates in family law. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
141
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. 1973.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61R0-TWPY-Y1H9&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
142
Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013. 2013.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=58YH-KVW1-DYCN-C1YY&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
143
Hudson v Leigh [2009] EWHC 1306. 2009.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?oc=00240&elb=t&lni=7VYJ-BVP0-YBF6-71X9&perma=true&csi=316762&secondRedirectIndicator=true
144
Leigh v Hudson [2009] EWCA Civ 1442. 2009.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?oc=00240&elb=t&lni=7XK5-RG80-YBF6-73KP&perma=true&csi=316762&secondRedirectIndicator=true
145
MA v JA [2012] EWHC 2219 (Fam). 2012.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5676-WV21-F0JY-C46B&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
146
Bevan C. The role of intention in non-marriage cases post Hudson v Leigh. Child and family law quarterly 2013;25.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_04_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_04_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_04_5
147
Probert, Rebecca. The Evolving Concept of Non-Marriage. Child and Family Law Quarterly 2013;:314–51.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq25&div=27&g_sent=1&collection=journals
148
Gender Recognition Act 2004. 2004.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61F0-TWPY-Y18X&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
149
Sheffield City Council v E & Anor [2004] EWHC 2808 (Fam) (02 December 2004). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2004/2808.html
150
Wilkinson v Kitzinger and others [2006] EWHC 2022 (Fam). 2006.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VG31-DYBP-P0N7&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
151
Harding R. ‘Wilkinson v Kitzinger’ (An alternative Judgment). In: Feminist judgments: from theory to practice. Oxford: : Hart 2010. 425–30.
152
Equal marriage consultation - Consultations - GOV.UK. 2012.https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/equal-marriage-consultation
153
R (on the application of Quila and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (on the application of Bibi and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45. 2011.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=540Y-JNJ1-F0JY-C4JF&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
154
Every Family Matters: An in-depth review of family law in Britain. 2009.http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/publications/every-family-matters
155
R (on the application of Baiai and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (on the application of Trzcinska and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53. 2008.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VGC1-DYBP-P4KY&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
156
P v R (Forced Marriage: Annulment) [2003] 1 FLR 661. 2002.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661
157
B v I [2010] 1 FLR 1721 (forced marriage as non-marriage). 2010.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20101FLR1721.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20101FLR1721
158
NS v MI [2006] EWHC 1646 (Fam), [2007] 2 FCR 748. 2006.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4R46-GW00-TWP1-D108&csi=274607&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
159
Goodwin v United Kingdom (Application 28957/95) [2002] IRLR 664, [2002] 2 FCR 577. 2002.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4R47-6YT0-TWP1-D0YN&csi=274607&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
160
Schafer, L. Marrying an in-law? The future of prohibited degrees of affinity and consanguinity in English Law. Child and Family Law Quarterly 2008;20:219–29.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq20&id=219&collection=journals&index=journals/chilflq
161
Lewis, Jane. Marriage and Cohabitation and the Nature of Commitment. Child and Family Law Quarterly 1999;11.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq11&id=363&collection=journals
162
Diduck A. Chapter 2. In: Law’s families. London: : LexisNexis 2003.
163
Probert R. Marriage law and practice in the long eighteenth century: a reassessment. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009.
164
Norrie, Kenneth McK. Marriage is for Heterosexuals - May the Rest of Us Be Saved From It. Child and Family Law Quarterly 2000;12.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq12&div=37&g_sent=1&collection=journals
165
Marriage Act 1949. 1949.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-G0K0-TWPY-Y0ND&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
166
Anitha S, Gill A. Coercion, Consent and the Forced Marriage Debate in the UK. Feminist Legal Studies 2009;17:165–84. doi:10.1007/s10691-009-9119-4
167
A choice by right : the report of the working group on forced marriage. [London]: : Home Office Communications Directorate 2000.
168
Bellinger v Bellinger (Lord Chancellor intervening) - [2003] 2 AC 467. 2003.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WN0-TXD8-60S7&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
169
CORBETT v. CORBETT (OTHERWISE ASHLEY) - [1971] P. 83. 1970.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPY0-TXD6-F09Y&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
170
Corbett v Corbett (otherwise Ashley) - [1970] 2 All ER 33. 1970.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-35T0-TWP1-60SD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
171
THE REES CASE [1987] 2 FLR 111. 1986.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111
172
Cossey v Cossey [1991] 2 FLR 492. 1991.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492
173
SHEFFIELD AND HORSHAM v UK [1998] 2 FLR 928. 1998.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928
174
W v W (Nullity: Gender) [2001] 1 FLR 324. 2001.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324
175
Gereis v Yagoub [1997] 1 FLR 854. 1997.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854
176
Chief Adjudication Officer v Bath [2000] 1 FLR 8. 2000.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008
177
B and L v UK [2006] 1 FLR 35. 2006.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035
178
The Marriage Act 1949 (Remedial) Order 2007 No. 438. 2007.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4SW7-STT0-TX08-H19V&csi=283307&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
179
Singh v Singh [1971] P 226. 1971.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPY0-TXD6-F0FK&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
180
Hirani v Hirani [1983] 4 FLR 232. 1982.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232
181
Vervaeke v Smith (Messina and A-G intervening) [1983] 1 AC 145, [1982] 2 All ER 144. 1983.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WP0-TXD8-60P2&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
182
Hyde v Hyde and Woodmansee - [1861-73] All ER Rep 175. 1866.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FPP-FDH0-TWXJ-213C&csi=279846&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
183
Gandhi v Patel et al [2002] 1 FLR 603. 2011.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603
184
BALFOUR v. BALFOUR. - [1919] 2 K.B. 571. 1919.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4F-RWJ0-TXD5-X0ST&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
185
Eekelaar J. Marriage: a modest proposal. Family Law 2013;83.
186
Halpern et al. v. Attorney General of Canada et al. (June 10, 2003). 2003.http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/decisions/2003/june/halpernC39172.htm
187
Minister of Home Affairs and another v Fourie and another; Lesbian and Gay Equality Project and others v Minister of Home Affairs and others - (2005) 20 BHRC 368. Published Online First: 2005.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K8Y-4HW0-TWP1-F189&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
188
Home Affairs v Fourie [2005] ZACC 19. 2005.http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2005/19.html
189
United States v Windsor 570 US 2013. 2012.http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/12
190
Auchmuty R. What’s so special about marriage? The Impact of Wilkinson v Kitzinger. Child and family law quarterly 2008;20.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_12_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_12_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_12_3
191
Tatchell P. Why our new same-sex marriage is not yet equal marriage. New statesman Published Online First: 19 July 2013.http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2013/07/why-our-new-same-sex-marriage-not-yet-equal-marriage
192
Civil Partnership Act 2004. 2004.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-FBY0-TWPY-Y055&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
193
Equality Act 2010 section 202. 2010.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7Y7R-3430-Y97X-73G2&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
194
*Vallianatos v Greece (Application nos 29381/09 and 32684/09). 2013.http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-128294#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-128294%22]}
195
Bamforth N. The benefits of marriage in all but name? Same sex couples and the Civil Partnership Act 2004. Child and family law quarterly 2007;19.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_06_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_06_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_06_1
196
Stychin C. *Family Friendly?: Rights, Responsibilities and Relationship Recognition. In: Feminist perspectives on family law. Abingdon: : Routledge-Cavendish 2006.
197
Crompton L. The Civil Partnerships Bill 2004: The Illusion of Equality. Family law 2004;34.
198
Hale B. Homosexual Rights. Child and family law quarterly 2004;16.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2004_03_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2004_03_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2004_03_1
199
Civil Partnership: A Framework for the legal recognition of same-sex couples. 2003.https://web.archive.org/web/20030801141524/http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/research/index.htm#civilpartnerships
200
*Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown (Overview). 2006.http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm
201
*Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown. 2007.http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm
202
Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. 2004.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFS1-DYBP-P11K&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
203
Barlow A, James G. *Regulating Marriage and Cohabitation in 21st Century Britain. Modern Law Review 2004;67:143–76. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00482.x
204
CM v STS [2008] CSOH 125 (2 September 2008). 2008.http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2008CSOH125.html
205
Miles J, Wasoff F, Mordaunt E. Reforming family law – the case of cohabitation: ‘things may not work out as you expect’. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2012;34:167–77. doi:10.1080/09649069.2012.718532
206
Douglas G, Pearce J, Woodward H. Cohabitants, Property and the Law: A Study of Injustice. Modern Law Review 2009;72:24–47. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00732.x
207
Barlow A. Cohabitation, marriage and the law: social change and legal reform in the 21st century. Oxford: : Hart 2005.
208
Deech R. Cohabitant. Family law 2010;40.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2010_01_31.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2010_01_31&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2010_01_31
209
Lewis, Jane. Marriage and Cohabitation and the Nature of Commitment. Child and Family Law Quarterly 1999;11.http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq11&div=40&g_sent=1&collection=journals
210
Parker S. Informal marriage, cohabitation and the law, 1750-1989. London: : Macmillan 1990.
211
Re J (Income Support: Cohabitation) [1995] 1 FLR 660. 1995.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660
212
Freeman MDA, Lyon CM. Cohabitation without marriage: an essay in law and social policy. Aldershot: : Gower 1983.
213
Deech R. The Case Against the Legal Recognition of Cohabitation. In: Marriage and cohabitation in contemporary societies: areas of legal, social and ethical change. Toronto: : Butterworths 1980.
214
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 12. In: Family law, gender and the state. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
215
Herring J. Chapter 6. In: Family law. Harlow: : Pearson 2013.
216
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 4. In: Family law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
217
New government domestic violence and abuse definition. 2013.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/new-government-domestic-violence-and-abuse-definition
218
Family Law Act 1996 Part IV. http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61P0-TWPY-Y1F8&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
219
Protection from Harassment Act 1997. 1997.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-HC70-TWPY-Y0CJ&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
220
Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004. 2004.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61F0-TWPY-Y0BK&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
221
Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007. 2007.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-HC60-TWPY-Y0KY&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
222
Crime and Security Act 2010. 2010.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7Y7B-PJM0-Y97X-74GB&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
223
Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014. 2014.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BS9-MNJ1-DYCN-C2CP&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
224
B v B (Occupation Order) [1999] 1 FLR 715. 1998.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715
225
Chalmers v Johns [1999] 1 FLR 392. http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392
226
Mark John Smith v R [2012] EWCA Crim 2566. 2012.http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2012/2566.html
227
Burris v Azadani - [1995] 4 All ER 802. 1995.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60YF&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
228
House of Lords. R v Ireland, R v Burstow [1997] 3 WLR 534. 1997. https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I4DA7AC70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
229
R v Hills [2001] 1 FLR 580. 2000.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580
230
Lau v Director of Public Prosecutions [2000] 1 FLR 799. 2000.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799
231
R v Colohan [2001] EWCA Crim 1251. 2001.http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2001/1251.html
232
Harris J. An Evaluation of the Use and Effectiveness of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. 2000.http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/hors2000.html
233
Bowcott O. Stalking prosecutions rise by 20% under new law on harassment | Law | The Guardian. The guardian Published Online First: 11 September 2014.http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/sep/11/stalking-prosecutions-rise-new-law-cps-acpo-victim-support
234
C v C [1998] Fam 70. 1998.http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPX0-TXD6-F1C5&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
235
Chechi v Bashier [1999] 2 FLR 489. 1999.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0489.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0489
236
G v F (Non-Molestation Order : Jurisdiction), [2000] 2 FLR 533. 2000.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20002FLR0533.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20002FLR0533
237
P v P (Contempt of Court: Mental Capacity) [1999] 2 FLR 897. 1999.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0897.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0897
238
Banks v Banks [1999] 1 FLR 726. 1999.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2Gdn5Ctm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
239
H v O (Contempt of Court: Sentencing) [2004] EWCA Civ 1691. 2004.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGtm2KJn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
240
Burton M. Civil law remedies for domestic violence: why are applications for non-molestation orders declining? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2009;31:109–20. doi:10.1080/09649060903043497
241
Dolan v Corby [2011] EWCA (Civ) 1664. 2011.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GtmYmJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
242
Richards v Richards (1983) 2 All ER 807. 1983.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
243
Kaganas, Felicity. B v B (Occupation Order) and Chalmers v Johns Occupation Orders under the Family Law Act 1996. Child and Family Law Quarterly 1999;11.http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq11&id=197&collection=journals&index=journals/chilflq
244
G v G (Occupation Order: Conduct) [2000] 2 FLR 36. 2000.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGZnZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
245
Murray v Robinson [2006] 1FLR 365. 2006.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2mZn0qtmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
246
Kazimirski et al. A. Forced marriage: prevalence and service response. 2009.http://www.natcen.ac.uk/our-research/research/forced-marriage/
247
Pearce N, Gill A. Criminalising Forced Marriage Through Stand alone Legislation: Will it Work? Family law 2012;42:534–42.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_05_30.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_05_30&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_05_30
248
*Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 3. 2011.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3mZm1GJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
249
Choudhry S, Herring J. Chapter 9. In: European human rights and family law. Oxford: : Hart 2010.
250
Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police v Van Colle [2008] UKHL 50. 2008.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZnYetnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
251
Burton M. Failing to Protect: Victims’ Rights and Police Liability. Modern Law Review 2009;72:283–95. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00744.x
252
Platt J. The Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 Part 1: Is it Working? Family law 2008;38.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2008_07_53.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2008_07_53&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2008_07_53
253
Dobash RP. Women’s Violence to Men in Intimate Relationships: Working on a Puzzle. British Journal of Criminology 2004;44:324–49. doi:10.1093/bjc/azh026
254
Finney A. Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the 2004/5 British Crime Survey Summary. 2006.http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/onlinepubs1.html
255
Call to end violence against women and girls. 2010.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/call-to-end-violence-against-women-and-girls
256
Hester M. Who does what to whom? Gender and domestic violence perpetrators in English police records. European Journal of Criminology 2013;10:623–37. doi:10.1177/1477370813479078
257
Walby S, Allen J. Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey. 2004.http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/hors2004.html
258
Hale v Tanner [2000] 2 FLR 879. 2000.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
259
Nwogbe v Nwogbe [2000] 2 FLR 744. 2000.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
260
Humphreys C, Thiara RK. Neither justice nor protection: women’s experiences of post‐separation violence. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2003;25:195–214. doi:10.1080/0964906032000145948
261
Paradine K, Wilkinson J. A research and literature review. Protection and accountability: the reporting, investigation and prosecution of domestic violence cases. [England: : National Centre for Policing Excellence 2004. http://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/cjji/inspections/violence-at-home-a-joint-thematic-inspection-of-the-investigation-and-prosecution-of-cases-involving-domestic-violence/#.VSaKF_A71wA
262
Dobash RE, Dobash RP. The Politics and Policies of Responding to Violence Against Women. In: Home truths about domestic violence: feminist influences on policy and practice : a reader. London: : Routledge 2000.
263
Law’s Progressive Potential: The Value of Engagement with the Law for Domestic Violence. Social & Legal Studies 2001;10:105–30.http://sls.sagepub.com/content/10/1/105.abstract
264
Great Britain. The Law Commission (Law Com. No. 207). Family law: domestic violence and occupation of the family home. [London: : House of Commons?] 1992. http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:hcpp&rft_dat=xri:hcpp:rec:1992-091023
265
Freeman M. Legal Ideologies; patriarchal precedents and domestic violence. In: The State, the law, and the family. London: : Tavistock 1984.
266
Hayes M. Non-Molestation Protection: Only Associated Persons Need Apply. Family law 1996;26.
267
Itzin C. Gendering Domestic Violence: The Influence of Feminsim on Policy and Practice. In: Home truths about domestic violence: feminist influences on policy and practice : a reader. London: : Routledge 2000.
268
Strengthening the law on domestic abuse - Consultations - Summary of responses. 2014.https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/strengthening-the-law-on-domestic-abuse
269
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 ss 1 – 10A. 1973.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmJmZKJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
270
Civil Partnership Act 2004 ss 44 - 48. 2004.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidn3KJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
271
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 3. In: Family law, gender and the state. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
272
Herring J. Chapter 3. In: Family law. Harlow: : Pearson 2013.
273
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 5. In: Family law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
274
Pheasant v Pheasant [1972] 1 All ER 587. 1972.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
275
Buffery v Buffery [1988] 2 FLR 365. 1987.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
276
Cleary v Cleary [1974] 1 All ER 498. 1974.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm2CJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
277
Carr v Carr [1974] 1 All ER 1193. 1974.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm4GdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
278
Ash v Ash [1972] 1 All ER 582. 1972.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
279
Pheasant v Pheasant [1972] 1 All ER 587. 1972.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
280
Thurlow v Thurlow [1975] 2 All ER 979. 1975.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmXqZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
281
Bradley v Bradley [1973] 3 All ER 750. 1973.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udnYCdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
282
Buffery v Buffery [1988] 2 FLR 365. 1987.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
283
Livingstone-Stollard v Livingstone-Stollard [1974] Fam 47. 1974.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm1qdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
284
Butterworth v Butterworth [1997] 2 FLR 336. 1997.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtm4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
285
Birch v Birch [1992] 1 FLR 564. 1992.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
286
Perry v Perry [1963] 3 All ER 766. 1963.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udo0mZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
287
Glenister v Glenister [1945] P 30. 1945.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CdnXCZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha/glenister-v-glenister
288
Dunn v Dunn [1967] P 217. 1967.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZn5uJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
289
Stringfellow v Stringfellow [1976] 2 All ER 539. 1976.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmWiZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
290
Pardy v Pardy [1939] P 288. 1939.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2Ctn2CZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
291
Slawson v Slawson [1942] 2 All ER 527. 1942.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGdn3iZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
292
Santos v Santos [1972] 2 All ER 246. 1972.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0GdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
293
Mouncer v Mouncer [ 1972] 1 All ER 289. 1972.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn1CJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
294
Parker v Parker [1972] 1 All ER 410. 1972.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0iZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
295
Rukat v Rukat [1975] 1 All ER 343. 1974.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmYatmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
296
Grenfell v Grenfell [1978] Fam 128. 1977.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJm1eJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
297
Archer v Archer [ 1999] 1 FLR 327. 1998.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYydmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
298
K v K (Financial relief: Widow’s Pension) [1997] 1 FLR 35. 1997.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidm4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
299
Wickler v Wickler [1998] 2 FLR 326. 1998.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
300
Douglas et al. G. The Role of Religious Tribunals in Regulating Marriage and Divorce. Child and family law quarterly 2012;24:139–57.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_02_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_02_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_02_1
301
Douglas et al G. Accommodating Religious Divorce in the Secular State: A Case-Study Analysis. In: Families: Deviance, Diversity and the Law. Hart Publishing 2013. 185–201.
302
Sandberg R, Douglas G, Doe N, et al. Britain’s Religious Tribunals: ‘Joint Governance’ in Practice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2013;33:263–91. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqs031
303
Diduck A. *Chapter 3. In: Law’s families. London: : LexisNexis 2003.
304
Reece H. Divorcing responsibly. Oxford: : Hart 2003.
305
Looking to the future: mediation and the ground for divorce the Government’s proposals - Publications - GOV.UK. 1995.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/looking-to-the-future-mediation-and-the-ground-for-divorce-the-governments-proposals
306
Family Law Act 1996. 1996.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYiZnXqdm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
307
Supporting Families: A consultation document. 1998.http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ERORecords/HO/421/2/P2/ACU/SUPPFAM.HTM
308
Eekelaar J. Family Justice: Ideal or Illusion?: Family Law and Communitarian Values. Current Legal Problems 1995;48:191–216. doi:10.1093/clp/48.Part_2.191
309
Cretney S. Divorce Reform in England: Humbug and Hypocrisy or a Smooth Transition? In: Divorce: where next? Aldershot, Hants: : Dartmouth Pub. Co 1996.
310
Deech R. *Divorce – A Disaster? Family law 2009;39.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_11_48.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_11_48&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_11_48
311
Smart C, Neale B. *Good enough morality? Divorce and postmodernity. Critical Social Policy 1997;17:3–27. doi:10.1177/026101839701705301
312
Dewar J. *The Normal Chaos of Family Law. Modern Law Review 1998;61:467–85. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00157
313
Sclater SD, Piper C. *The Family Law Act 1996 in Context. In: Undercurrents of divorce. Aldershot, England: : Ashgate 1999.
314
Douglas et al. G. Supporting Children when Parents Separate - A Neglected Family Justice or Mental Health Issue? Child and family law quarterly 1996;8.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1996_02_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1996_02_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1996_02_3
315
Sclater SD. *Narratives of divorce. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 1997;19:423–41. doi:10.1080/09649069708410209
316
Sclater SD. Divorce: a psychosocial study. Aldershot, Hants, England: : Ashgate 1999.
317
Sclater SD, Brown J. Divorce: A Psychodynamic Perspective. In: Undercurrents of divorce. Aldershot, England: : Ashgate 1999.
318
Sclater SD. Experiences of Divorce. In: Undercurrents of divorce. Aldershot, England: : Ashgate 1999.
319
Collier R. The Dashing of a ‘Liberal Dream’? - The Information Meeting, The ‘New Family’ and the Limits of Law. Child and family law quarterly 1999;11.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_03_4.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_03_4&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_03_4
320
Eekelaar J. *Family Law: Keeping us ‘On Message’. Child and family law quarterly 1999;11.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_04_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_04_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_04_5
321
Sclater SD, Piper C. *Re-moralising the Family? – Family Policy, Family Law and Youth Justice. Child and family law quarterly 2000;12.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_02_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_02_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_02_3
322
Reece H. *Divorcing Responsibly. Feminist Legal Studies 2000;8:65–91. doi:10.1023/A:1009283815775
323
Reece H. Divorcing the Children. In: Feminist perspectives on child law. London: : Cavendish 2000.
324
Eekelaar J, Beinart S, Maclean M. Family lawyers: the divorce work of solicitors. Oxford: : Hart 2000.
325
Walker et al. J. Picking up the Pieces: Marriage and Divorce: Two years after Information Provision. 2004.http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dca.gov.uk/pubs/reports/family2004-webpageintro.htm
326
Responses to Civil Partnership: A framework for the legal recognition of same-sex couples. 2003.http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20040105034450/http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/research/index.htm#cp_responses
327
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973. 1973.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmJmZKJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
328
Civil Partnership Act 2004. 2004.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidn3KJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
329
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 7. In: Family law, gender and the state. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
330
Herring J. Chapter 5. In: Family law. Harlow: : Pearson 2013.
331
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 7. In: Family law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
332
White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981. 2000.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white
333
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. 2006.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
334
Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503. 2007.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdnYuto2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
335
Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements - Law Commission. 2014.http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/publications/matrimonial-property.htm
336
Suter v Suter [1987] 2 FLR 232. 1986.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
337
Re A [1998] 1 FLR 347. 1998.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
338
*B v B (Financial Provision Welfare of Child and Conduct) [2002] 1 FLR 555. 2002.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
339
Prest v Petrodel Resources and others [2013] UKSC 34. 2013.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5yJn5itm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
340
George R. Family finances and the corporate veil: Prest v Petrodel. Family Law 2013;43.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_08_61.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_08_61&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_08_61
341
Sharland v Sharland [2014] EWCA 95. 2014.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5GJm5adn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
342
Delaney v Delaney [1990] 2 FLR 457. 1990.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457
343
Leadbeater v Leadbeater [1985] FLR 789. 1985.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo1mJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
344
P v P (Divorce: Financial Provision Clean Break) [2002] EWCA Civ 1886; [2003] 1 FLR 942. 2002.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZiJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/parra-v-parra
345
N v F [2011] EWHC 586 (pre-acquired wealth). 2011.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3udoWqJm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
346
*Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41. 2011.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3mZm3ytmYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/jones-v-jones
347
Y v Y (financial orders inherited wealth) [2012] EWHC Fam 2063. 2012.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uJn3mdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
348
SK v WL (post separation accrual] [2011] 1 FLR 1471. 2011.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3uZm1qJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
349
*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. 2006.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
350
*Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503. 2007.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdnYuto2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
351
Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171. 2010.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3itm3GtoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/robson-v-robson
352
K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550. 2011.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3eJn2udo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
353
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707. 2008.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
354
North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760. 2007.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZaJm1Kto1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
355
Dart v Dart [1996] 2 FLR 286. 1996.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYetn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
356
P v P (Inherited property) [2004] EWHC 1364; [2005] 1 FLR 576. 2004.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm3yZm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
357
Grey v Grey [2009] EWCA Civ 1424. 2009.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3aJm3Ctn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
358
SA v PA [2014] EWCA 392. 2014.http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXatmZuZmXqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
359
H v H [2014] EWHC 760. 2014.http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXadm3uJmWedlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
360
White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981. 2000.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white
361
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. 2006.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
362
Preston v Preston (1982) Fam 17. 1982.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXiZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
363
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707. 2008.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
364
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. 2006.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
365
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707. 2008.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
366
White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981. 2000.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white
367
*C v C (Financial Relief: Short Marriage) [1997] 2 FLR 26. 1997.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYitoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
368
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. 2006.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
369
*White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981. 2000.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white
370
*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. 2006.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
371
B v B (Mesher Order) [2002] EWHC 3106 (Fam); [2003] 2 FLR 285. 2002.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm1eZn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
372
*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. 2006.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
373
Wachtel v Wachtel [1973] Fam 72. 1973.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm5GJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
374
K v L [2010] EWCA Civ 125 (Child sexual abuse). 2010.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qdn3CdoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
375
Vaughn v Vaughn (financial misconduct) [2007] EWCA Civ 1085. 2007.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZado0adn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
376
K v K [1990] 2 FLR 225. 1990.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXeZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
377
Clark v Clark [1999] 2 FLR 498. 1999.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCJm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
378
Kokosinski v Kokosinski [1980] 1 All ER 1106. 1980.http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo0edlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
379
H v H (Financial Relief: Attempted Murder as Conduct) [2006] 1 FLR 990. 2006.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCZm5mtnWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
380
T v T (Financial relief: Pensions) [1998] 1 FLR 1072. 1998.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYqZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
381
C v C (Financial Relief: Short Marriage) [1997] 2 FLR 26. 1997.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYitoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
382
Suter v Suter [1987] 2 All ER 336. 1987.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha
383
Mawson v Mawson [1994] 2 FLR 985. 1994.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXCto1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
384
K v K (Ancillary Relief: Prenuptial Agreement) [2003] 1 FLR 120. 2003.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZitm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
385
K v K (Periodical Payment: Cohabitation) [2006] 2 FLR 468. 2006.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn2iZm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
386
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24. 2006.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break
387
Martin v Martin [1978] Fam 12. 1977.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn4Gto4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
388
Clutton v Clutton [1991] 1 All ER 340. 1991.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXetoZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
389
Mesher v Mesher and Hall [1980] 1 All ER 126. 1980.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCZn1adoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
390
Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360. 1999.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uZmWGZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/piglowski-v-piglowski
391
B v B (Mesher Order) [2002] EWHC 3106 (Fam); [2003] 2 FLR 285. 2002.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm1eZn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
392
Richardson v Richardson [1978] 9 Fam Law 86. 1978.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZidm4Ctn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
393
T v T (Financial relief: Pensions) [1998] 1 FLR 1072. 1998.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYqZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
394
S v S [2002] 1 FLR 457. 2002.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZedm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/s-v-s-rescission-of-decree-nisi-pension-sharing-provision
395
Do Divorced Women Catch Up in Pension Building? Child and family law quarterly 2002;14.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2002_02_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2002_02_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2002_02_3
396
PRICE D. Closing the Gender Gap in Retirement Income: What Difference Will Recent UK Pension Reforms Make? Journal of Social Policy 2007;36. doi:10.1017/S0047279407001183
397
Price D. Pension Accumulation and Gendered Household Structures. In: Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study. Oxford: : Hart Pub 2009. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847315274
398
Xydias v Xydias [1999] 1 FLR 683 – general policy. 1999.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYyZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
399
Soulsbury v Soulsbury [2007] EWCA Civ 969. 2007.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXytm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
400
Edgar v Edgar [1980] 1 WLR 1410. 1980.http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
401
MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64. 2009.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido0mJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/macleod-v-macleod
402
Crossley v Crossley [2007] EWCA Civ 1491. 2007.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetn5Cto4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
403
*Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA 649. 2010.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZn4adn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
404
Z v Z (No 2) [2011] EWHC 2878. 2011.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qdn2udm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
405
B v S [2012] EWHC 265. 2012.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4aJnXKZn3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
406
V v V [2011] EWHC 3230. 2011.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GZmYKdo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
407
SA v PA (pre-marital agreement) [2014] EWCA 392. 2014.http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXatmZuZmXqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
408
Pavlou P. Pre-Nuptial Agreements – Back Where we Were? Kremen v Agrest. Family law 2012;42.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_08_40.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_08_40&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_08_40
409
Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17. 2007.http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2mZn0itnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha/stack-v-dowden
410
Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53. 2011.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2GdnZuto0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
411
Consultation Paper No 179: Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown (Overview). 2006.http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm
412
Supplementary Consultation Paper Matrimonial Property,Needs and Agreements. 2012.http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/consultations/matrimonial_property.htm
413
*V v V [2011] EWHC 3230. 2011.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GZmYKdo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
414
McFarlane v McFarlane (no 2) [2009] EWHC 891. 2009.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CdoXGJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
415
GW v RW (Financial provision: Departure From Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108. 2003.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCto3CdoZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
416
MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64. 2009.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido0mJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/macleod-v-macleod
417
Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA 649. 2010.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZn4adn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
418
H v H [2007] EWHC 459 (Fam). 2007.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKtn4ytn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
419
S v S [2007] EWHC 1975 (Fam). 2007.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCJnXeJn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
420
B v B [2008] EWCA Civ 543. 2008.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXmZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/b-v-b-ancillary-relief-distribution-of-assets
421
VB v JP [ 2008] EWHC 112. 2008.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZeJn1qdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
422
Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360. 1999.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uZmWGZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/piglowski-v-piglowski
423
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707. 2008.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
424
Myerson v. Myerson (2009) 1 FLR 826. 2009.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido1iZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
425
Miles J. *Charman v Charman: making sense of need, compensation and equal sharing after Miller/McFarlane. Child and family law quarterly 2008;20.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_03_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_03_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_03_5
426
Diduck A. *Ancillary Relief: Complicating the Search for Principle. Journal of Law and Society 2011;38:272–300. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2011.00543.x
427
Leech S, Young R. Marriage, divorce and ancillary relief under the Human Rights Act 1998: an introduction. In: European human rights law review. 2001. 300–11.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I8497AF10E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
428
Douglas G, Perry A. How parents cope financially on separation and divorce- implications for the future of ancillary relief. Child and family law quarterly 2001;13.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2001_01_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2001_01_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2001_01_5
429
Eekelaar J. Back to Basics and Forward into the Unknown. Family law 2001;31.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_27.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_27&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_27
430
Diduck A. Fairness and Justice for All? The House of Lords in White v. White [2000] 2 F.L.R. 981. Feminist Legal Studies 2001;9:173–83. doi:10.1023/A:1016744705288
431
Diduck A. Chapter 6. In: Law’s families. London: : LexisNexis 2003.
432
Cretney S. The Family and the Law – Status or Contract? Child and family law quarterly 2003;15.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2003_04_6.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2003_04_6&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2003_04_6
433
Edwards S. Division of Assets and Fairness - `Brick Lane’ – Gender, Culture and Ancillary Relief on Divorce. Family law 2004;34.
434
Eekelaar J. Asset distribution on divorce - the durational element. Law quarterly review 2001;117.https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I79FFBD40E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true
435
Eekelaar J. Asset Distribution on Divorce – Time and Property. Family law 2003;33.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2003_11_29.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2003_11_29&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2003_11_29
436
Herring J. Why Financial Orders on Divorce should be Unfair. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2005;19:218–28. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebi016
437
Symes P. INDISSOLUBILITY AND THE CLEAN BREAK. The Modern Law Review 1985;48:44–60. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1985.tb00825.x
438
John Eekelaar. Equality and the Purpose of Maintenance. Journal of Law and Society 1988;15:188–200.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410053?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
439
Diduck A, Orton H. Equality and Support for Spouses. The Modern Law Review 1994;57:681–702. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.1994.tb01969.x
440
Diduck A. *What is Family Law For? Current Legal Problems 2011;64:287–314. doi:10.1093/clp/cur010
441
Hale B. *Equality and autonomy in family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 2011;33:3–14. doi:10.1080/09649069.2011.571466
442
Thorpe M. London- The Divorce Capital of the World. Family law 2009;39.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_01_24.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_01_24&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_01_24
443
Deech R. What’s a Woman Worth? Family law 2009;39.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_12_27.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_12_27&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_12_27
444
Ferguson L. *Family, Social Inequalities, and the Persuasive Force of Interpersonal Obligation. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2007;22:61–90. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebm015
445
Glennon L. *The limitations of equality discourses on the contours of intimate relations. In: Rights, gender and family law. Abingdon: : Routledge 2010.
446
Hitchings E. *Chaos or Consistency? Ancillary Relief in the ‘Everyday’ Case. In: Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study. Oxford: : Hart Pub 2009. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847315274
447
Ouazzani S. Prenuptial agreements: the implications of gender. Family law 2013;43.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_04_56.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_04_56&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_04_56
448
Herring J. Chapter 5. In: Family law. Harlow: : Pearson 2013.
449
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 7. In: Family law, gender and the state. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
450
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 6. In: Family law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2011.
451
Supporting Separated Families, Securing Children’s Futures: A Public Consultation Document. 2012.https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/supporting-separated-families-securing-children-s-futures
452
Government response to the consultation: Supporting separated families: securing children’s futures. 2013.https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/supporting-separated-families-securing-children-s-futures
453
Douglas et al. G. Contact is not a Commodity to be Bartered for Money. Family law 2011;41.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2011_05_44.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2011_05_44&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2011_05_44
454
R. (on the application of Kehoe) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 48; [2004] EWCA Civ 225; [2004] 1 FLR 1132 (on enforcement). 2005.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZmtm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
455
R (Rowley and others) v Sec State for Work and Pensions [ 2007] EWCA Civ 598. 2007.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZatn5yto3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
456
T v B [2010] EWHC 1444 (Fam). 2010.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3idmZitn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
457
Re A (child of the Family) [1998] 1 FLR 347. 1998.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
458
Re C (A Minor) (child Support Agency: Disclosure) [1995] 1 FLR 201. 1995.http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJn0CdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa
459
Re E (A Minor) (child Support: Blood Test) [1994] 2 FLR 548. 1994.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXCdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
460
J v C (Child: Financial Provision) [1999] 1 FLR 152. 1999.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudo1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
461
Re P (A Child) (Financial provision) [2003] 2 FLR 865. 2003.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo1uZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
462
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Jones [2004] 1 FLR. 282. 2003.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm4Ktn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
463
Treharne v. Sec of State for W&P [2009] 1 FLR 853. 2008.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido5mZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
464
Brookes v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 420. 2010.http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2KZn1iZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF
465
Bryson C, Ellman IM, McKay S, et al. Child Maintenance: How Much Should the State Require Fathers to Pay When Families Separate? 2013. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2321788
466
Skinner C. Child Maintenance Reforms: Understanding Fathers’ Expressive Agency and the Power of Reciprocity. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2013;27:242–65. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebt005
467
Strengthening Families, Promoting Parental Responsibility: the future of child maintenance Cm 7990. 2011.https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/strengthening-families-promoting-parental-responsibility-the-future-of-child-maintenance
468
Henshaw D. Recovering Child Support: routes to responsibility. 2006.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/recovering-child-support-routes-to-responsibility
469
Diduck A. Chapter 7. In: Law’s families. London: : LexisNexis 2003.
470
Wikeley N. Private Cases and the Child Support Agency. Family law 2001;31.http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?c=t&action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_28.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_28&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_28
471
Collier R. The Campaign Against the Child Support Act: ‘Errant Fathers and Family Men’. Family law 1994;24:384–7.
472
Alison Diduck. The Unmodified Family: The Child Support Act and the Construction of Legal Subjects. Journal of Law and Society 1995;22:527–48.http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410613?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
473
MACLEAN M, EEKELAAR J. CHILD SUPPORT: THE BRITISH SOLUTION. ‘International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family’ 1993;7:205–29. doi:10.1093/lawfam/7.2.205
474
Altman S. A Theory of Child Support. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 2003;17:173–210. doi:10.1093/lawfam/17.2.173
