Bibliography for LAWS3010: Family Law | University College London

1.
Oldham M. Blackstone’s statutes on family law 2014-2015. 23rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

2.
Herring J. Family law. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.

3.
Lowe NV, Douglas G, Bromley PM. Bromley’s family law. 10th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.

4.
Masson JM, Bailey-Harris RJ, Probert R, Cretney SM. Cretney principles of family law. 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 2008.

5.
Diduck A. Law’s families. London: LexisNexis; 2003.

6.
George RH. Ideas and debates in family law. Oxford: Hart; 2012.

7.
Herring J, Probert R, Gilmore S. Great debates in family law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.

8.
Choudhry S, Herring J. European human rights and family law. Oxford: Hart; 2010.

9.
Gilmore S, Herring J, Probert R. Landmark cases in family law. Oxford: Hart; 2011.

10.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Family law, gender and the state. 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart; 2012.

11.
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Family law: text, cases, and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

12.
Hale B. The family, law & society. 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.

13.
Archard D. Children: Rights and Childhood [Internet]. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis; 2004. Available from: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=199397

14.
Archard D. Children, family, and the state. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2003.

15.
Bainham A. Children and their families: contact, rights and welfare. Oxford: Hart; 2003.

16.
Barker N. Not the marrying kind: a feminist critique of same-sex marriage. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.

17.
Barlow A. Cohabitation, marriage and the law: social change and legal reform in the 21st century. Oxford: Hart; 2005.

18.
Bernstein A. Marriage proposals: questioning a legal status. New York: New York University Press; 2006.

19.
Bradley D. Family law and political culture: (Scandinavian laws in comparative perspective). London: Sweet & Maxwell; 1996.

20.
Monk D, Bridgeman J. Feminist perspectives on child law. London: Cavendish; 2000.

21.
Bridgeman J, Lind C, Keating HM. Responsibility, law and the family. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2008.

22.
Bridgeman J, Keating HM, Lind C. Regulating family responsibilities. Farnham: Ashgate; 2011.

23.
Burton M. Legal responses to domestic violence. London: Routledge-Cavendish; 2008.

24.
Carling AH, Duncan S, Edwards R. Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. London: Routledge; 2002.

25.
Collier R, Sheldon S. Fragmenting fatherhood: a socio-legal study. Oxford: Hart; 2008.

26.
Cretney S. Family Law in the Twentieth Century [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2005. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280919.001.0001/acprof-9780199280919

27.
Sclater SD. Divorce: a psychosocial study. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate; 1999.

28.
Piper C, Sclater SD. Undercurrents of divorce. Aldershot, England: Ashgate; 1999.

29.
Diduck A. Marriage and cohabitation. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2008.

30.
Diduck A, O’Donovan K. Feminist perspectives on family law. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish; 2006.

31.
Dobash RE, Cavanagh K. Changing violent men. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 2000.

32.
Donzelot J, Hurley R. The policing of families. London: Hutchinson;

33.
Lowe NV, Douglas G. The continuing evolution of family law. Bristol: Family Law; 2009.

34.
Eekelaar J. Family Law and Personal Life [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535422.001.0001/acprof-9780199535422

35.
Eekelaar J, Maclean M. Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2013.

36.
Eskridge WN. Equality practice: civil unions and the future of gay rights. New York: Routledge; 2002.

37.
Finch J, Mason J. Negotiating family responsibilities. Routledge; 1992.

38.
Fineman M. The illusion of equality: the rhetoric and reality of divorce reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991.

39.
Fineman M. The neutered mother, the sexual family, and other twentieth century tragedies. New York: Routledge; 1995.

40.
Fineman M. The autonomy myth: a theory of dependency. New York: New Press; 2004.

41.
Fortin J. Children’s rights and the developing law. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

42.
Freeman MDA. The moral status of children: essays on the rights of the child. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers; 1997.

43.
Goldstein J. The best interests of the child: the least detrimental alternative. New York: Free Press; 1996.

44.
Hale B, Hamlyn Trust. From the test tube to the coffin: choice and regulation in private life. London: Stevens & Sons/Sweet & Maxwell; 1996.

45.
Heaphy B, Smart C, Einarsdottir A. Same sex marriages: new generations, new relationships. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.

46.
Herring J. Caring and the law. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2013.

47.
Heinze E. Of innocence and autonomy: children, sex and human rights. Aldershot, Hants, England: Dartmouth; 2000.

48.
King M. A better world for children?: explorations in morality and authority. New York: Routledge; 1997.

49.
Lee N. Childhood and society: growing up in an age of uncertainty. Maidenhead: Open University; 2001.

50.
Maclean M, Eekelaar J. The parental obligation: a study of parenthood across households. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 1997.

51.
Maclean M, Eekelaar J. Family law advocacy: how barristers help the victims of family failure. Oxford: Hart; 2009.

52.
Eekelaar J, Maclean M. Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2013.

53.
Maclean M, Eekelaar J. Managing family justice in diverse societies. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2013.

54.
Maclean M. Parenting after partnering: containing conflict after separation. Oxford: Hart Pub; 2007.

55.
Dempsey MM. Prosecuting domestic violence: a philosophical analysis [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562169.001.1

56.
Miles J, Probert R. Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study [Internet]. Oxford: Hart Pub; 2009. Available from: https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/sharing-lives-dividing-assets-an-inter-disciplinary-study/

57.
Morgan DHJ. Family connections: an introduction to family studies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; 1996.

58.
Morgan DHJ. Rethinking family practices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011.

59.
Mount F. The subversive family: an alternative history of love and marriage. London: Unwin; 1982.

60.
Mullender A, Morley R. Children living with domestic violence: putting men’s abuse of women on the child care agenda. London: Whiting & Birch; 1994.

61.
O’Donovan K. Sexual divisions in law. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson; 1985.

62.
O’Donovan K. Family law matters. London: Pluto Press; 1993.

63.
Okin SM. Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books; 1989.

64.
Pahl J. Money and marriage. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education; 1989.

65.
Parker S. Informal marriage, cohabitation and the law, 1750-1989. London: Macmillan; 1990.

66.
Parton N. The politics of child abuse. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1985.

67.
Pateman C. The sexual contract. Cambridge: Polity; 1988.

68.
Piper C. The responsible parent: a study of divorce mediation. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1993.

69.
Pizzey E, Forbes A. Scream quietly or the neighbours will hear. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1974.

70.
Probert R. Family life and the law: under one roof. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2007.

71.
Probert R. Marriage law and practice in the long eighteenth century: a reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

72.
Probert R, Barton C, Cretney SM. Fifty years in family law: essays for Stephen Cretney. Cambridge: Intersentia; 2012.

73.
Probert R. The changing legal regulation of cohabitation: from fornicators to family, 1600-2010. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.

74.
Reece H. Divorcing responsibly. Oxford: Hart; 2003.

75.
Regan MC. Family law and the pursuit of intimacy. New York: New York University Press; 1993.

76.
Rodger JJ. Family life and social control: a sociological perspective. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1996.

77.
Sarat A, Felstiner WLF. Divorce lawyers and their clients: power and meaning in the legal process. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.

78.
Shanley ML. Just marriage. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.

79.
Silva EB, Smart C. The new family? London: Sage; 1999.

80.
Smart C. Personal life: new directions in sociological thinking. Cambridge: Polity; 2007.

81.
Smart C. The ties that bind: law, marriage and the reproduction of patriarchal relations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1984.

82.
Smart C. Feminism and the power of law. London: Routledge; 1989.

83.
Smart C, Neale B. Family fragments? Cambridge: Polity Press; 1999.

84.
Smart C, Neale B, Wade A. The changing experience of childhood: families and divorce. Cambridge: Polity; 2001.

85.
Spencer JR, Bois-Pedain A de. Freedom and responsibility in reproductive choice. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2006.

86.
Stark E. Coercive control: the entrapment of women in personal life. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.

87.
Wallbank JA, Choudhry S, Herring J. Rights, gender and family law. Abingdon: Routledge; 2010.

88.
Wallerstein JS, Kelly JB. Surviving the breakup: how children and parents cope with divorce. London: Grant McIntyre; 1980.

89.
Wallerstein JS, Blakeslee S. Second chances. London: Bantam; 1989.

90.
Weitzman LJ. The divorce revolution: the unexpected social and economic consequences for women and children in America. 1st Free Press paperback ed. New York: Free Press; 1987.

91.
Wikeley N. Child support: law and policy. Oxford: Hart; 2006.

92.
International journal of law, policy and the family. Oxford: Oxford University Press;

93.
Family law. Chichester, Sussex: Family Law;

94.
Child and family law quarterly. Bristol, UK: Jordan Pub.;

95.
The Journal of social welfare & family law. Andover [England]: Sweet & Maxwell;

96.
Family law quarterly. [Chicago, Ill.]: Section of Family Law, American Bar Association;

97.
Children’s Legal Centre (London, England). Childright. London: Children’s Legal Centre; 1983;

98.
The International Journal of Children’s Rights » Brill Online. Available from: http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/15718182

99.
International Family Law. Bristol, UK: Jordan Pub.;

100.
Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd - [2001] 1 AC 27. House of Lords; 1999; Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WH0-TXD8-61G7&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

101.
Vallianatos and others v Greece (App. nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09) - [2013] ECHR 29381/09. EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS (GRAND CHAMBER); 2013; Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BXR-HSG1-DYBP-X29X&csi=274793&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

102.
SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA - 30141/04 [2010] ECHR 995 (24 June 2010) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/995.html

103.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. *Chapter 1. Family law, gender and the state. 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart; 2012.

104.
Herring J. *Chapter 1. Family law. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.

105.
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 1. Family law: text, cases, and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

106.
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v M. House of Lords; 2006; Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFV1-DYBP-P1PV&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

107.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. *Chapter 5. Family law, gender and the state. 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart; 2012.

108.
Green Paper on the Family [Internet]. Available from: http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/publications/green-paper-on-the-family

109.
JDiduck A. A Family by any other Name ... or StarbucksTM comes to England. Journal of Law and Society. 2001 Jun;28(2):290–310.

110.
Bridgeman J, Lind C, Keating HM. Responsibility, law and the family. Aldershot: Ashgate; 2008.

111.
Silva EB, Smart C. The new family? London: Sage; 1999.

112.
Dewar J. The Normal Chaos of Family Law. Modern Law Review. 1998 Jul;61(4):467–485.

113.
Dewar J. Family law and its discontents. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2000 Apr 1;14(1):59–85.

114.
Fineman M. The neutered mother, the sexual family, and other twentieth century tragedies. New York: Routledge; 1995.

115.
Weeks, J. Elective Families: lesbian and gay life experiments. Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. London: Routledge; 2002.

116.
Carling AH, Duncan S, Edwards R. Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. London: Routledge; 2002.

117.
Diduck A. Shifting Familiarity. Current Legal Problems. 2005 Jan 1;58(1):235–254.

118.
Eekelaar J. Family Law and Personal Life [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2007. Available from: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535422.001.0001/acprof-9780199535422

119.
Glennon L. Obligations Between Adult Partners: Moving From Form to Function? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2007 Mar 15;22(1):22–60.

120.
Millbank J. The role of ‘functional family’ in same-sex family recognition trends. Family Law [Internet]. 2008;20(2):131–283. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_06_2.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_06_2&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_06_2

121.
Duncan S, Carter J, Phillips M, Roseneil S, Stoilova M. Legal rights for people who ‘Live Apart Together’? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2012 Dec;34(4):443–458.

122.
Farrah Ahmed and Jane Calderwood Norton*. Religious tribunals, religious freedom, and concern for vulnerable women. Child and Family Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2012;24(4):363–387. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_12_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_12_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_12_1

123.
Authority and Authenticity: Sharia Councils, Muslim Women’s Rights and the English courts. Child and family law quarterly [Internet]. 2013;25(2):119–136. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_06_2.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_06_2&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_06_2

124.
Family justice review: final report [Internet]. Ministry of Justice; 2011. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/family-justice-review-final-report--2

125.
Government response to the family justice review [Internet]. London; 2012. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-response-to-the-family-justice-review-a-system-with-children-and-families-at-its-heart

126.
Long R. Family Justice Review update: Contact and other issues for parents following separation - Commons Library Standard Note [Internet]. London: UK Parliament; 2012. Available from: http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/briefing-papers/SN06335/family-justice-review-update-contact-and-other-issues-for-parents-following-separation

127.
Justice Ryder. Judicial Proposals for the Modernisation of Family Justice [Internet]. Judiciary of England and Wales; 2012. Available from: https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications/family-modernisation-final-report/

128.
A brighter future for Family Justice [Internet]. Ministry of Justice; 2014. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/whats-happened-since-the-family-justice-review-a-brighter-future-for-family-justice

129.
George RH. *Ideas and debates in family law. Oxford: Hart; 2012.

130.
Eekelaar, John. Evaluating Legal Regulation of Family Behaviour. International Journal of the Jurisprudence of the Family [Internet]. 2010;1. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ijjf1&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=3&men_tab=srchresults&terms=Eekelaar,%20John&type=matchall

131.
Eekelaar J. "Not of the Highest Importance”: Family justice under threat. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2011 Dec;33(4):311–317.

132.
A Diduck. Autonomy and Vulnerability in family law: the missing link. In: Wallbank JA, Herring J, editors. Vulnerabilities, care and family law. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2014.

133.
Eekelaar J, Maclean M. Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2013.

134.
Cobb S. Legal aid reform: its impact on family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2013 Mar;35(1):3–19.

135.
Family Law Online special issue May 2014. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_30&addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_30.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_30&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false

136.
Q v Q [2014] EWFC 31 [Internet]. Royal Courts of Justice; 2014. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5CVC-5321-F0JY-C2TR&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

137.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 2. Family law, gender and the state. 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart; 2012.

138.
Herring J. Chapter 2. Family law. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.

139.
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 2. Family law: text, cases, and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

140.
George RH. Ideas and debates in family law. Oxford: Hart; 2012.

141.
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 [Internet]. 1973. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61R0-TWPY-Y1H9&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

142.
Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=58YH-KVW1-DYCN-C1YY&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

143.
Hudson v Leigh [2009] EWHC 1306 [Internet]. Royal Courts of Justice; 2009. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?oc=00240&elb=t&lni=7VYJ-BVP0-YBF6-71X9&perma=true&csi=316762&secondRedirectIndicator=true

144.
Leigh v Hudson [2009] EWCA Civ 1442 [Internet]. Royal Courts of Justice; 2009. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?oc=00240&elb=t&lni=7XK5-RG80-YBF6-73KP&perma=true&csi=316762&secondRedirectIndicator=true

145.
MA v JA [2012] EWHC 2219 (Fam) [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5676-WV21-F0JY-C46B&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

146.
Bevan C. The role of intention in non-marriage cases post Hudson v Leigh. Child and family law quarterly [Internet]. 2013;25(1). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_04_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_04_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_04_5

147.
Probert, Rebecca. The Evolving Concept of Non-Marriage. Child and Family Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2013;(3):314–351. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq25&div=27&g_sent=1&collection=journals

148.
Gender Recognition Act 2004 [Internet]. 2004. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61F0-TWPY-Y18X&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

149.
Sheffield City Council v E & Anor [2004] EWHC 2808 (Fam) (02 December 2004) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2004/2808.html

150.
Wilkinson v Kitzinger and others [2006] EWHC 2022 (Fam) [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VG31-DYBP-P0N7&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

151.
Harding R. ‘Wilkinson v Kitzinger’ (An alternative Judgment). Feminist judgments: from theory to practice. Oxford: Hart; 2010. p. 425–430.

152.
Equal marriage consultation - Consultations - GOV.UK [Internet]. Government Equalities Office; 2012. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/equal-marriage-consultation

153.
R (on the application of Quila and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (on the application of Bibi and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45 [Internet]. Supreme Court; 2011. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=540Y-JNJ1-F0JY-C4JF&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

154.
Every Family Matters: An in-depth review of family law in Britain [Internet]. The Centre for Social Justice; 2009. Available from: http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/publications/every-family-matters

155.
R (on the application of Baiai and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (on the application of Trzcinska and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 [Internet]. HOUSE OF LORDS; 2008. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VGC1-DYBP-P4KY&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

156.
P v R (Forced Marriage: Annulment) [2003] 1 FLR 661 [Internet]. 2002. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661

157.
B v I [2010] 1 FLR 1721 (forced marriage as non-marriage) [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20101FLR1721.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20101FLR1721

158.
NS v MI [2006] EWHC 1646 (Fam), [2007] 2 FCR 748 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4R46-GW00-TWP1-D108&csi=274607&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

159.
Goodwin v United Kingdom (Application 28957/95) [2002] IRLR 664, [2002] 2 FCR 577 [Internet]. ECtHR; 2002. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4R47-6YT0-TWP1-D0YN&csi=274607&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

160.
Schafer, L. Marrying an in-law? The future of prohibited degrees of affinity and consanguinity in English Law. Child and Family Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2008;20(2):219–229. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq20&id=219&collection=journals&index=journals/chilflq

161.
Lewis, Jane. Marriage and Cohabitation and the Nature of Commitment. Child and Family Law Quarterly [Internet]. 1999;11. Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq11&id=363&collection=journals

162.
Diduck A. Chapter 2. Law’s families. London: LexisNexis; 2003.

163.
Probert R. Marriage law and practice in the long eighteenth century: a reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.

164.
Norrie, Kenneth McK. Marriage is for Heterosexuals - May the Rest of Us Be Saved From It. Child and Family Law Quarterly [Internet]. 2000;12. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq12&div=37&g_sent=1&collection=journals

165.
Marriage Act 1949 [Internet]. 1949. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-G0K0-TWPY-Y0ND&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

166.
Anitha S, Gill A. Coercion, Consent and the Forced Marriage Debate in the UK. Feminist Legal Studies. 2009 Aug;17(2):165–184.

167.
A choice by right : the report of the working group on forced marriage. [London]: Home Office Communications Directorate; 2000.

168.
Bellinger v Bellinger (Lord Chancellor intervening) - [2003] 2 AC 467 [Internet]. House of Lords; 2003. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WN0-TXD8-60S7&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

169.
CORBETT v. CORBETT (OTHERWISE ASHLEY) - [1971] P. 83 [Internet]. 1970. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPY0-TXD6-F09Y&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

170.
Corbett v Corbett (otherwise Ashley) - [1970] 2 All ER 33 [Internet]. 1970. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-35T0-TWP1-60SD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

171.
THE REES CASE [1987] 2 FLR 111 [Internet]. European Court of Human Rights; 1986. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111

172.
Cossey v Cossey [1991] 2 FLR 492 [Internet]. European Court of Human Rights; 1991. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492

173.
SHEFFIELD AND HORSHAM v UK [1998] 2 FLR 928 [Internet]. European Court of Human Rights; 1998. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928

174.
W v W (Nullity: Gender) [2001] 1 FLR 324 [Internet]. 2001. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324

175.
Gereis v Yagoub [1997] 1 FLR 854 [Internet]. 1997. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854

176.
Chief Adjudication Officer v Bath [2000] 1 FLR 8 [Internet]. Court of Appeal; 2000. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008

177.
B and L v UK [2006] 1 FLR 35 [Internet]. European Court of Human Rights; 2006. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035

178.
The Marriage Act 1949 (Remedial) Order 2007 No. 438 [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4SW7-STT0-TX08-H19V&csi=283307&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

179.
Singh v Singh [1971] P 226 [Internet]. Court of Appeal; 1971. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPY0-TXD6-F0FK&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

180.
Hirani v Hirani [1983] 4 FLR 232 [Internet]. Court of Appeal; 1982. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232

181.
Vervaeke v Smith (Messina and A-G intervening) [1983] 1 AC 145, [1982] 2 All ER 144 [Internet]. House of Lords; 1983. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WP0-TXD8-60P2&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

182.
Hyde v Hyde and Woodmansee - [1861-73] All ER Rep 175 [Internet]. 1866. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FPP-FDH0-TWXJ-213C&csi=279846&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

183.
Gandhi v Patel et al [2002] 1 FLR 603 [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603

184.
BALFOUR v. BALFOUR. - [1919] 2 K.B. 571 [Internet]. 1919. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4F-RWJ0-TXD5-X0ST&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

185.
Eekelaar J. Marriage: a modest proposal. Family Law. 2013;83(1).

186.
Halpern et al. v. Attorney General of Canada et al. (June 10, 2003) [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/decisions/2003/june/halpernC39172.htm

187.
Minister of Home Affairs and another v Fourie and another; Lesbian and Gay Equality Project and others v Minister of Home Affairs and others - (2005) 20 BHRC 368. 2005; Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K8Y-4HW0-TWP1-F189&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

188.
Home Affairs v Fourie [2005] ZACC 19 [Internet]. CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA; 2005. Available from: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2005/19.html

189.
United States v Windsor 570 US 2013 [Internet]. Supreme Court of the United States; 2012. Available from: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/12

190.
Auchmuty R. What’s so special about marriage? The Impact of Wilkinson v Kitzinger. Child and family law quarterly [Internet]. 2008;20(4). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_12_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_12_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_12_3

191.
Tatchell P. Why our new same-sex marriage is not yet equal marriage. New statesman [Internet]. 2013 Jul 19; Available from: http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2013/07/why-our-new-same-sex-marriage-not-yet-equal-marriage

192.
Civil Partnership Act 2004 [Internet]. 2004. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-FBY0-TWPY-Y055&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

193.
Equality Act 2010 section 202 [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7Y7R-3430-Y97X-73G2&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

194.
*Vallianatos v Greece (Application nos 29381/09 and 32684/09) [Internet]. European Court of Human Rights; 2013. Available from: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-128294#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-128294%22]}

195.
Bamforth N. The benefits of marriage in all but name? Same sex couples and the Civil Partnership Act 2004. Child and family law quarterly [Internet]. 2007;19(2). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_06_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_06_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_06_1

196.
Stychin C. *Family Friendly?: Rights, Responsibilities and Relationship Recognition. Feminist perspectives on family law. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish; 2006.

197.
Crompton L. The Civil Partnerships Bill 2004: The Illusion of Equality. Family law. 2004;34(12).

198.
Hale B. Homosexual Rights. Child and family law quarterly [Internet]. 2004;16(2). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2004_03_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2004_03_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2004_03_1

199.
Civil Partnership: A Framework for the legal recognition of same-sex couples [Internet]. Department of Trade and Industry; 2003. Available from: https://web.archive.org/web/20030801141524/http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/research/index.htm#civilpartnerships

200.
*Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown (Overview) [Internet]. The Law Commission; 2006. Available from: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm

201.
*Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown [Internet]. The Law Commission; 2007. Available from: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm

202.
Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30 [Internet]. HOUSE OF LORDS; 2004. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFS1-DYBP-P11K&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

203.
Barlow A, James G. *Regulating Marriage and Cohabitation in 21st Century Britain. Modern Law Review. 2004 Mar;67(2):143–176.

204.
CM v STS [2008] CSOH 125 (2 September 2008) [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2008CSOH125.html

205.
Miles J, Wasoff F, Mordaunt E. Reforming family law – the case of cohabitation: ‘things may not work out as you expect’. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2012 Jun;34(2):167–177.

206.
Douglas G, Pearce J, Woodward H. Cohabitants, Property and the Law: A Study of Injustice. Modern Law Review. 2009 Jan;72(1):24–47.

207.
Barlow A. Cohabitation, marriage and the law: social change and legal reform in the 21st century. Oxford: Hart; 2005.

208.
Deech R. Cohabitant. Family law [Internet]. 2010;40(1). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2010_01_31.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2010_01_31&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2010_01_31

209.
Lewis, Jane. Marriage and Cohabitation and the Nature of Commitment. Child and Family Law Quarterly [Internet]. 1999;11(4). Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq11&div=40&g_sent=1&collection=journals

210.
Parker S. Informal marriage, cohabitation and the law, 1750-1989. London: Macmillan; 1990.

211.
Re J (Income Support: Cohabitation) [1995] 1 FLR 660 [Internet]. 1995. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660

212.
Freeman MDA, Lyon CM. Cohabitation without marriage: an essay in law and social policy. Aldershot: Gower; 1983.

213.
Deech R. The Case Against the Legal Recognition of Cohabitation. Marriage and cohabitation in contemporary societies: areas of legal, social and ethical change. Toronto: Butterworths; 1980.

214.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 12. Family law, gender and the state. 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart; 2012.

215.
Herring J. Chapter 6. Family law. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.

216.
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 4. Family law: text, cases, and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

217.
New government domestic violence and abuse definition [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/new-government-domestic-violence-and-abuse-definition

218.
Family Law Act 1996 Part IV [Internet]. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61P0-TWPY-Y1F8&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

219.
Protection from Harassment Act 1997 [Internet]. 1997. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-HC70-TWPY-Y0CJ&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

220.
Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 [Internet]. 2004. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61F0-TWPY-Y0BK&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

221.
Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007 [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-HC60-TWPY-Y0KY&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

222.
Crime and Security Act 2010 [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7Y7B-PJM0-Y97X-74GB&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

223.
Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BS9-MNJ1-DYCN-C2CP&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

224.
B v B (Occupation Order) [1999] 1 FLR 715 [Internet]. Court of Appeal; 1998. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715

225.
Chalmers v Johns [1999] 1 FLR 392 [Internet]. Court of Appeal; Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392

226.
Mark John Smith v R [2012] EWCA Crim 2566 [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2012/2566.html

227.
Burris v Azadani - [1995] 4 All ER 802 [Internet]. 1995. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60YF&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

228.
House of Lords. R v Ireland, R v Burstow [1997] 3 WLR 534 [Internet]. 1997. Available from: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I4DA7AC70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true

229.
R v Hills [2001] 1 FLR 580 [Internet]. Court of Appeal; 2000. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580

230.
Lau v Director of Public Prosecutions [2000] 1 FLR 799 [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799

231.
R v Colohan [2001] EWCA Crim 1251 [Internet]. 2001. Available from: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2001/1251.html

232.
Harris J. An Evaluation of the Use and Effectiveness of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 [Internet]. Home Office; 2000. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/hors2000.html

233.
Bowcott O. Stalking prosecutions rise by 20% under new law on harassment | Law | The Guardian. The guardian [Internet]. 2014 Sep 11; Available from: http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/sep/11/stalking-prosecutions-rise-new-law-cps-acpo-victim-support

234.
C v C [1998] Fam 70 [Internet]. 1998. Available from: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPX0-TXD6-F1C5&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

235.
Chechi v Bashier [1999] 2 FLR 489 [Internet]. Court of Appeal; 1999. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0489.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0489

236.
G v F (Non-Molestation Order : Jurisdiction), [2000] 2 FLR 533 [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20002FLR0533.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20002FLR0533

237.
P v P (Contempt of Court: Mental Capacity) [1999] 2 FLR 897 [Internet]. Court of Appeal; 1999. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0897.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0897

238.
Banks v Banks [1999] 1 FLR 726 [Internet]. 1999. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2Gdn5Ctm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

239.
H v O (Contempt of Court: Sentencing) [2004] EWCA Civ 1691 [Internet]. 2004. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGtm2KJn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

240.
Burton M. Civil law remedies for domestic violence: why are applications for non-molestation orders declining? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2009 Jun;31(2):109–120.

241.
Dolan v Corby [2011] EWCA (Civ) 1664 [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GtmYmJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

242.
Richards v Richards (1983) 2 All ER 807 [Internet]. 1983. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

243.
Kaganas, Felicity. B v B (Occupation Order) and Chalmers v Johns Occupation Orders under the Family Law Act 1996. Child and Family Law Quarterly [Internet]. 1999;11(2). Available from: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq11&id=197&collection=journals&index=journals/chilflq

244.
G v G (Occupation Order: Conduct) [2000] 2 FLR 36 [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGZnZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

245.
Murray v Robinson [2006] 1FLR 365 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2mZn0qtmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

246.
Kazimirski et al. A. Forced marriage: prevalence and service response [Internet]. National Centre for Social Research; 2009. Available from: http://www.natcen.ac.uk/our-research/research/forced-marriage/

247.
Pearce N, Gill A. Criminalising Forced Marriage Through Stand alone Legislation: Will it Work? Family law [Internet]. 2012;42(5):534–542. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_05_30.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_05_30&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_05_30

248.
*Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 3 [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3mZm1GJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

249.
Choudhry S, Herring J. Chapter 9. European human rights and family law. Oxford: Hart; 2010.

250.
Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police v Van Colle [2008] UKHL 50 [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZnYetnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

251.
Burton M. Failing to Protect: Victims’ Rights and Police Liability. Modern Law Review. 2009 Mar;72(2):283–295.

252.
Platt J. The Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 Part 1: Is it Working? Family law [Internet]. 2008;38(7). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2008_07_53.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2008_07_53&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2008_07_53

253.
Dobash RP. Women’s Violence to Men in Intimate Relationships: Working on a Puzzle. British Journal of Criminology. 2004 Apr 8;44(3):324–349.

254.
Finney A. Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the 2004/5 British Crime Survey Summary [Internet]. Home Office; 2006. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/onlinepubs1.html

255.
Call to end violence against women and girls [Internet]. London: TSO; 2010. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/call-to-end-violence-against-women-and-girls

256.
Hester M. Who does what to whom? Gender and domestic violence perpetrators in English police records. European Journal of Criminology. 2013 Sep 1;10(5):623–637.

257.
Walby S, Allen J. Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey [Internet]. Home Office; 2004. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/hors2004.html

258.
Hale v Tanner [2000] 2 FLR 879 [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

259.
Nwogbe v Nwogbe [2000] 2 FLR 744 [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

260.
Humphreys C, Thiara RK. Neither justice nor protection: women’s experiences of post‐separation violence. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2003 Sep;25(3):195–214.

261.
Paradine K, Wilkinson J. A research and literature review. Protection and accountability: the reporting, investigation and prosecution of domestic violence cases [Internet]. [England: National Centre for Policing Excellence; 2004. Available from: http://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/cjji/inspections/violence-at-home-a-joint-thematic-inspection-of-the-investigation-and-prosecution-of-cases-involving-domestic-violence/#.VSaKF_A71wA

262.
Dobash RE, Dobash RP. The Politics and Policies of Responding to Violence Against Women. Home truths about domestic violence: feminist influences on policy and practice : a reader. London: Routledge; 2000.

263.
Law’s Progressive Potential: The Value of Engagement with the Law for Domestic Violence. Social & Legal Studies [Internet]. SAGE Publications; 2001 Mar 1;10(1):105–130. Available from: http://sls.sagepub.com/content/10/1/105.abstract

264.
Great Britain. The Law Commission (Law Com. No. 207). Family law: domestic violence and occupation of the family home [Internet]. [London: House of Commons?]; 1992. Available from: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:hcpp&rft_dat=xri:hcpp:rec:1992-091023

265.
Freeman M. Legal Ideologies; patriarchal precedents and domestic violence. The State, the law, and the family. London: Tavistock; 1984.

266.
Hayes M. Non-Molestation Protection: Only Associated Persons Need Apply. Family law. 1996;26.

267.
Itzin C. Gendering Domestic Violence: The Influence of Feminsim on Policy and Practice. Home truths about domestic violence: feminist influences on policy and practice : a reader. London: Routledge; 2000.

268.
Strengthening the law on domestic abuse - Consultations - Summary of responses [Internet]. Home Office; 2014. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/strengthening-the-law-on-domestic-abuse

269.
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 ss 1 – 10A [Internet]. 1973. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmJmZKJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

270.
Civil Partnership Act 2004 ss 44 - 48 [Internet]. 2004. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidn3KJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

271.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 3. Family law, gender and the state. 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart; 2012.

272.
Herring J. Chapter 3. Family law. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.

273.
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 5. Family law: text, cases, and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

274.
Pheasant v Pheasant [1972] 1 All ER 587 [Internet]. 1972. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

275.
Buffery v Buffery [1988] 2 FLR 365 [Internet]. 1987. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

276.
Cleary v Cleary [1974] 1 All ER 498 [Internet]. 1974. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm2CJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

277.
Carr v Carr [1974] 1 All ER 1193 [Internet]. 1974. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm4GdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

278.
Ash v Ash [1972] 1 All ER 582 [Internet]. 1972. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

279.
Pheasant v Pheasant [1972] 1 All ER 587 [Internet]. 1972. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

280.
Thurlow v Thurlow [1975] 2 All ER 979 [Internet]. 1975. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmXqZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

281.
Bradley v Bradley [1973] 3 All ER 750 [Internet]. 1973. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udnYCdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

282.
Buffery v Buffery [1988] 2 FLR 365 [Internet]. 1987. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

283.
Livingstone-Stollard v Livingstone-Stollard [1974] Fam 47 [Internet]. 1974. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm1qdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

284.
Butterworth v Butterworth [1997] 2 FLR 336 [Internet]. 1997. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtm4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

285.
Birch v Birch [1992] 1 FLR 564 [Internet]. 1992. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

286.
Perry v Perry [1963] 3 All ER 766 [Internet]. 1963. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udo0mZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

287.
Glenister v Glenister [1945] P 30 [Internet]. 1945. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CdnXCZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha/glenister-v-glenister

288.
Dunn v Dunn [1967] P 217 [Internet]. 1967. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZn5uJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

289.
Stringfellow v Stringfellow [1976] 2 All ER 539 [Internet]. 1976. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmWiZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

290.
Pardy v Pardy [1939] P 288 [Internet]. 1939. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2Ctn2CZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

291.
Slawson v Slawson [1942] 2 All ER 527 [Internet]. 1942. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGdn3iZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

292.
Santos v Santos [1972] 2 All ER 246 [Internet]. 1972. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0GdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

293.
Mouncer v Mouncer [ 1972] 1 All ER 289 [Internet]. 1972. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn1CJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

294.
Parker v Parker [1972] 1 All ER 410 [Internet]. 1972. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0iZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

295.
Rukat v Rukat [1975] 1 All ER 343 [Internet]. 1974. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmYatmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

296.
Grenfell v Grenfell [1978] Fam 128 [Internet]. 1977. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJm1eJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

297.
Archer v Archer [ 1999] 1 FLR 327 [Internet]. 1998. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYydmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

298.
K v K (Financial relief: Widow’s Pension) [1997] 1 FLR 35 [Internet]. 1997. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidm4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

299.
Wickler v Wickler [1998] 2 FLR 326 [Internet]. 1998. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

300.
Douglas et al. G. The Role of Religious Tribunals in Regulating Marriage and Divorce. Child and family law quarterly [Internet]. 2012;24(2):139–157. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_02_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_02_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_02_1

301.
Douglas et al G. Accommodating Religious Divorce in the Secular State: A Case-Study Analysis. Families: Deviance, Diversity and the Law. Hart Publishing; 2013. p. 185–201.

302.
Sandberg R, Douglas G, Doe N, Gilliat-Ray S, Khan A. Britain’s Religious Tribunals: ‘Joint Governance’ in Practice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 2013 Jun 1;33(2):263–291.

303.
Diduck A. *Chapter 3. Law’s families. London: LexisNexis; 2003.

304.
Reece H. Divorcing responsibly. Oxford: Hart; 2003.

305.
Looking to the future: mediation and the ground for divorce the Government’s proposals - Publications - GOV.UK [Internet]. London; 1995. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/looking-to-the-future-mediation-and-the-ground-for-divorce-the-governments-proposals

306.
Family Law Act 1996 [Internet]. 1996. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYiZnXqdm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

307.
Supporting Families: A consultation document [Internet]. Home Office; 1998. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ERORecords/HO/421/2/P2/ACU/SUPPFAM.HTM

308.
Eekelaar J. Family Justice: Ideal or Illusion?: Family Law and Communitarian Values. Current Legal Problems. 1995 Jan 1;48(Part 2):191–216.

309.
Cretney S. Divorce Reform in England: Humbug and Hypocrisy or a Smooth Transition? Divorce: where next? Aldershot, Hants: Dartmouth Pub. Co; 1996.

310.
Deech R. *Divorce – A Disaster? Family law [Internet]. 2009;39(11). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_11_48.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_11_48&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_11_48

311.
Smart C, Neale B. *Good enough morality? Divorce and postmodernity. Critical Social Policy. 1997 Nov 1;17(53):3–27.

312.
Dewar J. *The Normal Chaos of Family Law. Modern Law Review. 1998 Jul;61(4):467–485.

313.
Sclater SD, Piper C. *The Family Law Act 1996 in Context. Undercurrents of divorce. Aldershot, England: Ashgate; 1999.

314.
Douglas et al. G. Supporting Children when Parents Separate - A Neglected Family Justice or Mental Health Issue? Child and family law quarterly [Internet]. 1996;8(2). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1996_02_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1996_02_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1996_02_3

315.
Sclater SD. *Narratives of divorce. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 1997 Oct;19(4):423–441.

316.
Sclater SD. Divorce: a psychosocial study. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate; 1999.

317.
Sclater SD, Brown J. Divorce: A Psychodynamic Perspective. Undercurrents of divorce. Aldershot, England: Ashgate; 1999.

318.
Sclater SD. Experiences of Divorce. Undercurrents of divorce. Aldershot, England: Ashgate; 1999.

319.
Collier R. The Dashing of a ‘Liberal Dream’? - The Information Meeting, The ‘New Family’ and the Limits of Law. Child and family law quarterly [Internet]. 1999;11(3). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_03_4.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_03_4&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_03_4

320.
Eekelaar J. *Family Law: Keeping us ‘On Message’. Child and family law quarterly [Internet]. 1999;11(4). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_04_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_04_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_04_5

321.
Sclater SD, Piper C. *Re-moralising the Family? – Family Policy, Family Law and Youth Justice. Child and family law quarterly [Internet]. 2000;12(2). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_02_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_02_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_02_3

322.
Reece H. *Divorcing Responsibly. Feminist Legal Studies. 2000;8(1):65–91.

323.
Reece H. Divorcing the Children. Feminist perspectives on child law. London: Cavendish; 2000.

324.
Eekelaar J, Beinart S, Maclean M. Family lawyers: the divorce work of solicitors. Oxford: Hart; 2000.

325.
Walker et al. J. Picking up the Pieces: Marriage and Divorce: Two years after Information Provision [Internet]. London: Department for Constitutional Affairs; 2004. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dca.gov.uk/pubs/reports/family2004-webpageintro.htm

326.
Responses to Civil Partnership: A framework for the legal recognition of same-sex couples [Internet]. London: DTI; 2003. Available from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20040105034450/http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/research/index.htm#cp_responses

327.
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 [Internet]. 1973. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmJmZKJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

328.
Civil Partnership Act 2004 [Internet]. 2004. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidn3KJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

329.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 7. Family law, gender and the state. 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart; 2012.

330.
Herring J. Chapter 5. Family law. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.

331.
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 7. Family law: text, cases, and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

332.
White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981 [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white

333.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

334.
Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503 [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdnYuto2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

335.
Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements - Law Commission [Internet]. London: Law Commission; 2014. Available from: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/publications/matrimonial-property.htm

336.
Suter v Suter [1987] 2 FLR 232 [Internet]. 1986. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

337.
Re A [1998] 1 FLR 347 [Internet]. 1998. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

338.
*B v B (Financial Provision Welfare of Child and Conduct) [2002] 1 FLR 555 [Internet]. 2002. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

339.
Prest v Petrodel Resources and others [2013] UKSC 34 [Internet]. 2013. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5yJn5itm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

340.
George R. Family finances and the corporate veil: Prest v Petrodel. Family Law [Internet]. 2013;43(8). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_08_61.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_08_61&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_08_61

341.
Sharland v Sharland [2014] EWCA 95 [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5GJm5adn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

342.
Delaney v Delaney [1990] 2 FLR 457 [Internet]. 1990. Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457

343.
Leadbeater v Leadbeater [1985] FLR 789 [Internet]. 1985. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo1mJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

344.
P v P (Divorce: Financial Provision Clean Break) [2002] EWCA Civ 1886; [2003] 1 FLR 942 [Internet]. 2002. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZiJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/parra-v-parra

345.
N v F [2011] EWHC 586 (pre-acquired wealth) [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3udoWqJm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

346.
*Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41 [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3mZm3ytmYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/jones-v-jones

347.
Y v Y (financial orders inherited wealth) [2012] EWHC Fam 2063 [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uJn3mdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

348.
SK v WL (post separation accrual] [2011] 1 FLR 1471 [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3uZm1qJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

349.
*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

350.
*Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503 [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdnYuto2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

351.
Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171 [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3itm3GtoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/robson-v-robson

352.
K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550 [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3eJn2udo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

353.
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707 [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

354.
North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760 [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZaJm1Kto1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

355.
Dart v Dart [1996] 2 FLR 286 [Internet]. 1996. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYetn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

356.
P v P (Inherited property) [2004] EWHC 1364; [2005] 1 FLR 576 [Internet]. 2004. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm3yZm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

357.
Grey v Grey [2009] EWCA Civ 1424 [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3aJm3Ctn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

358.
SA v PA [2014] EWCA 392 [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXatmZuZmXqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa

359.
H v H [2014] EWHC 760 [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXadm3uJmWedlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa

360.
White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981 [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white

361.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

362.
Preston v Preston (1982) Fam 17 [Internet]. 1982. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXiZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

363.
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707 [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

364.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

365.
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707 [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

366.
White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981 [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white

367.
*C v C (Financial Relief: Short Marriage) [1997] 2 FLR 26 [Internet]. 1997. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYitoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

368.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

369.
*White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981 [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white

370.
*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

371.
B v B (Mesher Order) [2002] EWHC 3106 (Fam); [2003] 2 FLR 285 [Internet]. 2002. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm1eZn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

372.
*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

373.
Wachtel v Wachtel [1973] Fam 72 [Internet]. 1973. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm5GJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

374.
K v L [2010] EWCA Civ 125 (Child sexual abuse) [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qdn3CdoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

375.
Vaughn v Vaughn (financial misconduct) [2007] EWCA Civ 1085 [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZado0adn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

376.
K v K [1990] 2 FLR 225 [Internet]. 1990. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXeZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

377.
Clark v Clark [1999] 2 FLR 498 [Internet]. 1999. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCJm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

378.
Kokosinski v Kokosinski [1980] 1 All ER 1106 [Internet]. 1980. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo0edlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa

379.
H v H (Financial Relief: Attempted Murder as Conduct) [2006] 1 FLR 990 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCZm5mtnWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

380.
T v T (Financial relief: Pensions) [1998] 1 FLR 1072 [Internet]. 1998. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYqZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

381.
C v C (Financial Relief: Short Marriage) [1997] 2 FLR 26 [Internet]. 1997. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYitoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

382.
Suter v Suter [1987] 2 All ER 336 [Internet]. 1987. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

383.
Mawson v Mawson [1994] 2 FLR 985 [Internet]. 1994. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXCto1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

384.
K v K (Ancillary Relief: Prenuptial Agreement) [2003] 1 FLR 120 [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZitm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

385.
K v K (Periodical Payment: Cohabitation) [2006] 2 FLR 468 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn2iZm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

386.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24 [Internet]. 2006. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

387.
Martin v Martin [1978] Fam 12 [Internet]. 1977. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn4Gto4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

388.
Clutton v Clutton [1991] 1 All ER 340 [Internet]. 1991. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXetoZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

389.
Mesher v Mesher and Hall [1980] 1 All ER 126 [Internet]. 1980. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCZn1adoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

390.
Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360 [Internet]. 1999. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uZmWGZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/piglowski-v-piglowski

391.
B v B (Mesher Order) [2002] EWHC 3106 (Fam); [2003] 2 FLR 285 [Internet]. 2002. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm1eZn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

392.
Richardson v Richardson [1978] 9 Fam Law 86 [Internet]. 1978. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZidm4Ctn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

393.
T v T (Financial relief: Pensions) [1998] 1 FLR 1072 [Internet]. 1998. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYqZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

394.
S v S [2002] 1 FLR 457 [Internet]. 2002. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZedm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/s-v-s-rescission-of-decree-nisi-pension-sharing-provision

395.
Do Divorced Women Catch Up in Pension Building? Child and family law quarterly [Internet]. 2002;14(2). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2002_02_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2002_02_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2002_02_3

396.
PRICE D. Closing the Gender Gap in Retirement Income: What Difference Will Recent UK Pension Reforms Make? Journal of Social Policy. 2007 Oct;36(04).

397.
Price D. Pension Accumulation and Gendered Household Structures. Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study [Internet]. Oxford: Hart Pub; 2009. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847315274

398.
Xydias v Xydias [1999] 1 FLR 683 – general policy [Internet]. 1999. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYyZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

399.
Soulsbury v Soulsbury [2007] EWCA Civ 969 [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXytm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

400.
Edgar v Edgar [1980] 1 WLR 1410 [Internet]. 1980. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa

401.
MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64 [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido0mJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/macleod-v-macleod

402.
Crossley v Crossley [2007] EWCA Civ 1491 [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetn5Cto4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

403.
*Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA 649 [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZn4adn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

404.
Z v Z (No 2) [2011] EWHC 2878 [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qdn2udm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

405.
B v S [2012] EWHC 265 [Internet]. 2012. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4aJnXKZn3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

406.
V v V [2011] EWHC 3230 [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GZmYKdo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

407.
SA v PA (pre-marital agreement) [2014] EWCA 392 [Internet]. 2014. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXatmZuZmXqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa

408.
Pavlou P. Pre-Nuptial Agreements – Back Where we Were? Kremen v Agrest. Family law [Internet]. 2012;42(8). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_08_40.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_08_40&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_08_40

409.
Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17 [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2mZn0itnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha/stack-v-dowden

410.
Jones v Kernott [2011] UKSC 53 [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2GdnZuto0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

411.
Consultation Paper No 179: Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown (Overview) [Internet]. Law Commission; 2006. Available from: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm

412.
Supplementary Consultation Paper Matrimonial Property,Needs and Agreements [Internet]. London: Law Commission; 2012. Available from: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/consultations/matrimonial_property.htm

413.
*V v V [2011] EWHC 3230 [Internet]. 2011. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GZmYKdo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

414.
McFarlane v McFarlane (no 2) [2009] EWHC 891 [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CdoXGJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

415.
GW v RW (Financial provision: Departure From Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108 [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCto3CdoZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

416.
MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64 [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido0mJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/macleod-v-macleod

417.
Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA 649 [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZn4adn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

418.
H v H [2007] EWHC 459 (Fam) [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKtn4ytn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

419.
S v S [2007] EWHC 1975 (Fam) [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCJnXeJn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

420.
B v B [2008] EWCA Civ 543 [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXmZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/b-v-b-ancillary-relief-distribution-of-assets

421.
VB v JP [ 2008] EWHC 112 [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZeJn1qdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

422.
Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360 [Internet]. 1999. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uZmWGZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/piglowski-v-piglowski

423.
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707 [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

424.
Myerson v. Myerson (2009) 1 FLR 826 [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido1iZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

425.
Miles J. *Charman v Charman: making sense of need, compensation and equal sharing after Miller/McFarlane. Child and family law quarterly [Internet]. 2008;20(3). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_03_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_03_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_03_5

426.
Diduck A. *Ancillary Relief: Complicating the Search for Principle. Journal of Law and Society. 2011 Jun;38(2):272–300.

427.
Leech S, Young R. Marriage, divorce and ancillary relief under the Human Rights Act 1998: an introduction. European human rights law review [Internet]. 2001. p. 300–311. Available from: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I8497AF10E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true

428.
Douglas G, Perry A. How parents cope financially on separation and divorce- implications for the future of ancillary relief. Child and family law quarterly [Internet]. 2001;13(1). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2001_01_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2001_01_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2001_01_5

429.
Eekelaar J. Back to Basics and Forward into the Unknown. Family law [Internet]. 2001;31(1). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_27.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_27&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_27

430.
Diduck A. Fairness and Justice for All? The House of Lords in White v. White [2000] 2 F.L.R. 981. Feminist Legal Studies. 2001;9(2):173–183.

431.
Diduck A. Chapter 6. Law’s families. London: LexisNexis; 2003.

432.
Cretney S. The Family and the Law – Status or Contract? Child and family law quarterly [Internet]. 2003;15(4). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2003_04_6.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2003_04_6&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2003_04_6

433.
Edwards S. Division of Assets and Fairness - `Brick Lane’ – Gender, Culture and Ancillary Relief on Divorce. Family law. 2004;34(11).

434.
Eekelaar J. Asset distribution on divorce - the durational element. Law quarterly review [Internet]. 2001;117(Oct). Available from: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I79FFBD40E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true

435.
Eekelaar J. Asset Distribution on Divorce – Time and Property. Family law [Internet]. 2003;33(11). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2003_11_29.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2003_11_29&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2003_11_29

436.
Herring J. Why Financial Orders on Divorce should be Unfair. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2005 Aug 1;19(2):218–228.

437.
Symes P. INDISSOLUBILITY AND THE CLEAN BREAK. The Modern Law Review. 1985 Jan;48(1):44–60.

438.
John Eekelaar. Equality and the Purpose of Maintenance. Journal of Law and Society [Internet]. 1988;15(2):188–200. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410053?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

439.
Diduck A, Orton H. Equality and Support for Spouses. The Modern Law Review. 1994 Sep;57(5):681–702.

440.
Diduck A. *What is Family Law For? Current Legal Problems. 2011 Jan 1;64(1):287–314.

441.
Hale B. *Equality and autonomy in family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2011 Mar;33(1):3–14.

442.
Thorpe M. London- The Divorce Capital of the World. Family law [Internet]. 2009;39(1). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_01_24.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_01_24&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_01_24

443.
Deech R. What’s a Woman Worth? Family law [Internet]. 2009;39(12). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_12_27.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_12_27&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_12_27

444.
Ferguson L. *Family, Social Inequalities, and the Persuasive Force of Interpersonal Obligation. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2007 Mar 15;22(1):61–90.

445.
Glennon L. *The limitations of equality discourses on the contours of intimate relations. Rights, gender and family law. Abingdon: Routledge; 2010.

446.
Hitchings E. *Chaos or Consistency? Ancillary Relief in the ‘Everyday’ Case. Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study [Internet]. Oxford: Hart Pub; 2009. Available from: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847315274

447.
Ouazzani S. Prenuptial agreements: the implications of gender. Family law [Internet]. 2013;43(4). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_04_56.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_04_56&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_04_56

448.
Herring J. Chapter 5. Family law. 6th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2013.

449.
Diduck A, Kaganas F. Chapter 7. Family law, gender and the state. 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart; 2012.

450.
Harris-Short S, Miles J. Chapter 6. Family law: text, cases, and materials. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.

451.
Supporting Separated Families, Securing Children’s Futures: A Public Consultation Document [Internet]. DWP; 2012. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/supporting-separated-families-securing-children-s-futures

452.
Government response to the consultation: Supporting separated families: securing children’s futures [Internet]. DWP; 2013. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/supporting-separated-families-securing-children-s-futures

453.
Douglas et al. G. Contact is not a Commodity to be Bartered for Money. Family law [Internet]. 2011;41(5). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2011_05_44.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2011_05_44&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2011_05_44

454.
R. (on the application of Kehoe) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 48; [2004] EWCA Civ 225; [2004] 1 FLR 1132 (on enforcement). [Internet]. 2005. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZmtm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

455.
R (Rowley and others) v Sec State for Work and Pensions [ 2007] EWCA Civ 598 [Internet]. 2007. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZatn5yto3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

456.
T v B [2010] EWHC 1444 (Fam) [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3idmZitn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

457.
Re A (child of the Family) [1998] 1 FLR 347 [Internet]. 1998. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

458.
Re C (A Minor) (child Support Agency: Disclosure) [1995] 1 FLR 201 [Internet]. 1995. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJn0CdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa

459.
Re E (A Minor) (child Support: Blood Test) [1994] 2 FLR 548 [Internet]. 1994. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXCdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

460.
J v C (Child: Financial Provision) [1999] 1 FLR 152 [Internet]. 1999. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudo1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

461.
Re P (A Child) (Financial provision) [2003] 2 FLR 865 [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo1uZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

462.
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Jones [2004] 1 FLR. 282 [Internet]. 2003. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm4Ktn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

463.
Treharne v. Sec of State for W&P [2009] 1 FLR 853 [Internet]. 2008. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido5mZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

464.
Brookes v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 420 [Internet]. 2010. Available from: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2KZn1iZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

465.
Bryson C, Ellman IM, McKay S, Miles J. Child Maintenance: How Much Should the State Require Fathers to Pay When Families Separate? 2013.

466.
Skinner C. Child Maintenance Reforms: Understanding Fathers’ Expressive Agency and the Power of Reciprocity. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2013 Aug 1;27(2):242–265.

467.
Strengthening Families, Promoting Parental Responsibility: the future of child maintenance Cm 7990 [Internet]. London: DWP; 2011. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/strengthening-families-promoting-parental-responsibility-the-future-of-child-maintenance

468.
Henshaw D. Recovering Child Support: routes to responsibility [Internet]. DWP; 2006. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/recovering-child-support-routes-to-responsibility

469.
Diduck A. Chapter 7. Law’s families. London: LexisNexis; 2003.

470.
Wikeley N. Private Cases and the Child Support Agency. Family law [Internet]. 2001;31(1). Available from: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?c=t&action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_28.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_28&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_28

471.
Collier R. The Campaign Against the Child Support Act: ‘Errant Fathers and Family Men’. Family law. 1994;24:384–387.

472.
Alison Diduck. The Unmodified Family: The Child Support Act and the Construction of Legal Subjects. Journal of Law and Society [Internet]. 1995;22(4):527–548. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410613?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

473.
MACLEAN M, EEKELAAR J. CHILD SUPPORT: THE BRITISH SOLUTION. ‘International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family’. 1993;7(2):205–229.

474.
Altman S. A Theory of Child Support. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 2003 Aug 1;17(2):173–210.

Bibliography for LAWS3010: Family Law BETA