Bibliography for LAWS3010: Family Law BETA

[1]

M. Oldham, Blackstone’s statutes on family law 2014-2015, 23rd ed., vol. Blackstone’s statutes series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014.

[2]

J. Herring, Family law, 6th ed., vol. Longman law series. Harlow: Pearson, 2013.

[3]

N. V. Lowe, G. Douglas, and P. M. Bromley, Bromley’s family law, 10th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

[4]

J. M. Masson, R. J. Bailey-Harris, R. Probert, and S. M. Cretney, Cretney principles of family law, 8th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2008.

[5]

A. Diduck, Law’s families, vol. Law in context. London: LexisNexis, 2003.

[6]

R. H. George, Ideas and debates in family law. Oxford: Hart, 2012.

[7]

J. Herring, R. Probert, and S. Gilmore, Great debates in family law, vol. Palgrave Macmillan great debates in law. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

[8]

S. Choudhry and J. Herring, European human rights and family law. Oxford: Hart, 2010.

[9]

S. Gilmore, J. Herring, and R. Probert, Landmark cases in family law. Oxford: Hart, 2011.

[10]

A. Diduck and F. Kaganas, Family law, gender and the state, 3rd ed. Oxford: Hart, 2012.

[11]

S. Harris-Short and J. Miles, Family law: text, cases, and materials, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

[12]

B. Hale, The family, law & society, 6th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

[13]

D. Archard, Children: Rights and Childhood, 2nd ed., vol. Ideas. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://UCL.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=199397

[14]

D. Archard, Children, family, and the state, vol. Live questions in ethics and moral philosophy. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.

[15]

A. Bainham, Children and their families: contact, rights and welfare. Oxford: Hart, 2003.

[16]

N. Barker, Not the marrying kind: a feminist critique of same-sex marriage, vol. Palgrave Macmillan socio-legal studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

[17]

A. Barlow, Cohabitation, marriage and the law: social change and legal reform in the 21st century. Oxford: Hart, 2005.

[18]

A. Bernstein, Marriage proposals: questioning a legal status. New York: New York University Press, 2006.

[19]

D. Bradley, Family law and political culture: (Scandinavian laws in comparative perspective), vol. Modern legal studies. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1996.

[20]

D. Monk and J. Bridgeman, Feminist perspectives on child law, vol. Feminist perspectives in law. London: Cavendish, 2000.

[21]

J. Bridgeman, C. Lind, and H. M. Keating, Responsibility, law and the family. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.

[22]

J. Bridgeman, H. M. Keating, and C. Lind, Regulating family responsibilities. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011.

[23]

M. Burton, Legal responses to domestic violence. London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2008.

[24]

A. H. Carling, S. Duncan, and R. Edwards, Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. London: Routledge, 2002.

[25]

R. Collier and S. Sheldon, Fragmenting fatherhood: a socio-legal study. Oxford: Hart, 2008.

[26]

S. Cretney, Family Law in the Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280919.001.0001/acprof-9780199280919

[27]

S. D. Sclater, Divorce: a psychosocial study. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, 1999.

[28]

C. Piper and S. D. Sclater, Undercurrents of divorce. Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 1999.

[29]

A. Diduck, Marriage and cohabitation, vol. The family, law&society. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.

[30]

A. Diduck and K. O’Donovan, Feminist perspectives on family law. Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2006.

[31]

R. E. Dobash and K. Cavanagh, Changing violent men, vol. Sage series on violence against women. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications, 2000.

[32]

J. Donzelot and R. Hurley, The policing of families. London: Hutchinson.

[33]

N. V. Lowe and G. Douglas, The continuing evolution of family law. Bristol: Family Law, 2009.

[34]

J. Eekelaar, Family Law and Personal Life. Oxford University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535422.001.0001/acprof-9780199535422

[35]

J. Eekelaar and M. Maclean, Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013.

[36]

W. N. Eskridge, Equality practice: civil unions and the future of gay rights. New York: Routledge, 2002.

[37]

J. Finch and J. Mason, Negotiating family responsibilities. Routledge, 1992.

[38]

M. Fineman, The illusion of equality: the rhetoric and reality of divorce reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.

[39]

M. Fineman, The neutered mother, the sexual family, and other twentieth century tragedies. New York: Routledge, 1995.

[40]

M. Fineman, The autonomy myth: a theory of dependency. New York: New Press, 2004.

[41]

J. Fortin, Children’s rights and the developing law, 3rd ed., vol. The law in context series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

[42]

M. D. A. Freeman, The moral status of children: essays on the rights of the child. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1997.

[43]

J. Goldstein, The best interests of the child: the least detrimental alternative. New York: Free Press, 1996.

[44]

B. Hale and Hamlyn Trust, From the test tube to the coffin: choice and regulation in private life, vol. Hamlyn lectures. London: Stevens & Sons/Sweet & Maxwell, 1996.

[45]

B. Heaphy, C. Smart, and A. Einarsdottir, Same sex marriages: new generations, new relationships, vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

[46]

J. Herring, Caring and the law. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013.

[47]

E. Heinze, Of innocence and autonomy: children, sex and human rights, vol. Programme on International Rights of the Child (Series). Aldershot, Hants, England: Dartmouth, 2000.

[48]

M. King, A better world for children?: explorations in morality and authority. New York: Routledge, 1997.

[49]

N. Lee, Childhood and society: growing up in an age of uncertainty, vol. Issues in society. Maidenhead: Open University, 2001.

[50]

M. Maclean and J. Eekelaar, The parental obligation: a study of parenthood across households. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 1997.

[51]

M. Maclean and J. Eekelaar, Family law advocacy: how barristers help the victims of family failure. Oxford: Hart, 2009.

[52]

J. Eekelaar and M. Maclean, Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013.

[53]

M. Maclean and J. Eekelaar, Managing family justice in diverse societies, vol. Oñati international series in law and society. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013.

[54]

M. Maclean, Parenting after partnering: containing conflict after separation, vol. Oñati international series in law and society. Oxford: Hart Pub, 2007.

[55]

M. M. Dempsey, Prosecuting domestic violence: a philosophical analysis, vol. Oxford monographs on criminal law and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199562169.001.1

[56]

J. Miles and R. Probert, Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study. Oxford: Hart Pub, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://www-bloomsburycollections-com.libproxy.ucl.ac.uk/book/sharing-lives-dividing-assets-an-inter-disciplinary-study/

[57]

D. H. J. Morgan, Family connections: an introduction to family studies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press, 1996.

[58]

D. H. J. Morgan, Rethinking family practices, vol. Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

[59]

F. Mount, The subversive family: an alternative history of love and marriage. London: Unwin, 1982.

[60]

A. Mullender and R. Morley, Children living with domestic violence: putting men’s abuse of women on the child care agenda. London: Whiting & Birch, 1994.

[61]

K. O’Donovan, Sexual divisions in law, vol. Law in context. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1985.

[62]

K. O’Donovan, Family law matters, vol. Law and social theory. London: Pluto Press, 1993.

[63]

S. M. Okin, Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books, 1989.

[64]

J. Pahl, Money and marriage. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, 1989.

[65]

S. Parker, Informal marriage, cohabitation and the law, 1750-1989. London: Macmillan, 1990.

[66]

N. Parton, The politics of child abuse. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1985.

[67]

C. Pateman, The sexual contract. Cambridge: Polity, 1988.

[68]

C. Piper, The responsible parent: a study of divorce mediation. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1993.

[69]

E. Pizzey and A. Forbes, Scream quietly or the neighbours will hear, vol. A Penguin special. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1974.

[70]

R. Probert, Family life and the law: under one roof. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.

[71]

R. Probert, Marriage law and practice in the long eighteenth century: a reassessment, vol. Cambridge studies in English legal history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

[72]

R. Probert, C. Barton, and S. M. Cretney, Fifty years in family law: essays for Stephen Cretney. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2012.

[73]

R. Probert, The changing legal regulation of cohabitation: from fornicators to family, 1600-2010, vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

[74]

H. Reece, Divorcing responsibly. Oxford: Hart, 2003.

[75]

M. C. Regan, Family law and the pursuit of intimacy. New York: New York University Press, 1993.

[76]

J. J. Rodger, Family life and social control: a sociological perspective. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1996.

[77]

A. Sarat and W. L. F. Felstiner, Divorce lawyers and their clients: power and meaning in the legal process. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.

[78]

M. L. Shanley, Just marriage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.

[79]

E. B. Silva and C. Smart, The new family? London: Sage, 1999.

[80]

C. Smart, Personal life: new directions in sociological thinking. Cambridge: Polity, 2007.

[81]

C. Smart, The ties that bind: law, marriage and the reproduction of patriarchal relations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1984.

[82]

C. Smart, Feminism and the power of law, vol. Sociology of law and crime. London: Routledge, 1989.

[83]

C. Smart and B. Neale, Family fragments? Cambridge: Polity Press, 1999.

[84]

C. Smart, B. Neale, and A. Wade, The changing experience of childhood: families and divorce. Cambridge: Polity, 2001.

[85]

J. R. Spencer and A. de Bois-Pedain, Freedom and responsibility in reproductive choice. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006.

[86]

E. Stark, Coercive control: the entrapment of women in personal life, vol. Interpersonal violence. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

[87]

J. A. Wallbank, S. Choudhry, and J. Herring, Rights, gender and family law. Abingdon: Routledge, 2010.

[88]

J. S. Wallerstein and J. B. Kelly, Surviving the breakup: how children and parents cope with divorce. London: Grant McIntyre, 1980.

[89]

J. S. Wallerstein and S. Blakeslee, Second chances. London: Bantam, 1989.

[90]

L. J. Weitzman, The divorce revolution: the unexpected social and economic consequences for women and children in America, 1st Free Press paperback ed. New York: Free Press, 1987.

[91]

N. Wikeley, Child support: law and policy. Oxford: Hart, 2006.

[92]

‘International journal of law, policy and the family’.

[93]

‘Family law’.

[94]

‘Child and family law quarterly’.

[95]

‘The Journal of social welfare & family law’.

[96]

‘Family law quarterly’.

[97]

Children’s Legal Centre (London, England), ‘Childright’, 1983.

[98]

‘The International Journal of Children’s Rights  »  Brill Online’ [Online]. Available: http://booksandjournals.brillonline.com/content/journals/15718182

[99]

‘International Family Law’.

[100]

‘Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd - [2001] 1 AC 27’, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WH0-TXD8-61G7&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[101]

‘Vallianatos and others v Greece (App. nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09) - [2013] ECHR 29381/09’, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BXR-HSG1-DYBP-X29X&csi=274793&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[102]

‘SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA - 30141/04 [2010] ECHR 995 (24 June 2010)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/995.html

[103]

A. Diduck and F. Kaganas, ‘*Chapter 1’, in Family law, gender and the state, 3rd ed., Oxford: Hart, 2012.

[104]

J. Herring, ‘*Chapter 1’, in Family law, 6th ed., vol. Longman law series, Harlow: Pearson, 2013.

[105]

S. Harris-Short and J. Miles, ‘Chapter 1’, in Family law: text, cases, and materials, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

[106]

‘Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v M’, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFV1-DYBP-P1PV&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[107]

A. Diduck and F. Kaganas, ‘*Chapter 5’, in Family law, gender and the state, 3rd ed., Oxford: Hart, 2012.

[108]

‘Green Paper on the Family’. [Online]. Available: http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/publications/green-paper-on-the-family

[109]

A. JDiduck, ‘A Family by any other Name ... or StarbucksTM comes to England’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 290–310, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-6478.00190.

[110]

J. Bridgeman, C. Lind, and H. M. Keating, Responsibility, law and the family. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2008.

[111]

E. B. Silva and C. Smart, The new family? London: Sage, 1999.

[112]

J. Dewar, ‘The Normal Chaos of Family Law’, Modern Law Review, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 467–485, Jul. 1998, doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00157.

[113]

J. Dewar, ‘Family law and its discontents’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 59–85, Apr. 2000, doi: 10.1093/lawfam/14.1.59.

[114]

M. Fineman, The neutered mother, the sexual family, and other twentieth century tragedies. New York: Routledge, 1995.

[115]

Weeks, J., ‘Elective Families: lesbian and gay life experiments’, in Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice, London: Routledge, 2002.

[116]

A. H. Carling, S. Duncan, and R. Edwards, Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. London: Routledge, 2002.

[117]

A. Diduck, ‘Shifting Familiarity’, Current Legal Problems, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 235–254, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1093/clp/58.1.235.

[118]

J. Eekelaar, Family Law and Personal Life. Oxford University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535422.001.0001/acprof-9780199535422

[119]

L. Glennon, ‘Obligations Between Adult Partners: Moving From Form to Function?’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 22–60, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1093/lawfam/ebm017.

[120]

J. Millbank, ‘The role of ‘functional family’ in same-sex family recognition trends’, Family Law, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 131–283, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_06_2.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_06_2&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_06_2

[121]

S. Duncan, J. Carter, M. Phillips, S. Roseneil, and M. Stoilova, ‘Legal rights for people who “Live Apart Together”?’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 443–458, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1080/09649069.2012.753731.

[122]

Farrah Ahmed and Jane Calderwood Norton*, ‘Religious tribunals, religious freedom, and concern for vulnerable women’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 363–387, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_12_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_12_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_12_1

[123]

‘Authority and Authenticity: Sharia Councils, Muslim Women’s Rights and the English courts’, Child and family law quarterly, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 119–136, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_06_2.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_06_2&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_06_2

[124]

‘Family justice review: final report’. Ministry of Justice, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/family-justice-review-final-report--2

[125]

‘Government response to the family justice review’. London, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-response-to-the-family-justice-review-a-system-with-children-and-families-at-its-heart

[126]

R. Long, ‘Family Justice Review update: Contact and other issues for parents following separation - Commons Library Standard Note’. UK Parliament, London, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/briefing-papers/SN06335/family-justice-review-update-contact-and-other-issues-for-parents-following-separation

[127]

Justice Ryder, ‘Judicial Proposals for the Modernisation of Family Justice’. Judiciary of England and Wales, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications/family-modernisation-final-report/

[128]

‘A brighter future for Family Justice’. Ministry of Justice, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/whats-happened-since-the-family-justice-review-a-brighter-future-for-family-justice

[129]

R. H. George, *Ideas and debates in family law. Oxford: Hart, 2012.

[130]

Eekelaar, John, ‘Evaluating Legal Regulation of Family Behaviour’, International Journal of the Jurisprudence of the Family, vol. 1, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ijjf1&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=3&men_tab=srchresults&terms=Eekelaar,%20John&type=matchall

[131]

J. Eekelaar, ‘"Not of the Highest Importance”: Family justice under threat’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 311–317, Dec. 2011, doi: 10.1080/09649069.2011.632883.

[132]

A Diduck, ‘Autonomy and Vulnerability in family law: the missing link’, in Vulnerabilities, care and family law, J. A. Wallbank and J. Herring, Eds. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2014.

[133]

J. Eekelaar and M. Maclean, Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013.

[134]

S. Cobb, ‘Legal aid reform: its impact on family law’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 3–19, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1080/09649069.2013.774607.

[135]

‘Family Law Online special issue May 2014’ [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_30&addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_30.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_30&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false

[136]

‘Q v Q [2014] EWFC 31’. Royal Courts of Justice, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5CVC-5321-F0JY-C2TR&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[137]

A. Diduck and F. Kaganas, ‘Chapter 2’, in Family law, gender and the state, 3rd ed., Oxford: Hart, 2012.

[138]

J. Herring, ‘Chapter 2’, in Family law, 6th ed., vol. Longman law series, Harlow: Pearson, 2013.

[139]

S. Harris-Short and J. Miles, ‘Chapter 2’, in Family law: text, cases, and materials, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

[140]

R. H. George, Ideas and debates in family law. Oxford: Hart, 2012.

[141]

‘Matrimonial Causes Act 1973’. 1973 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61R0-TWPY-Y1H9&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[142]

‘Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013’. 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=58YH-KVW1-DYCN-C1YY&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[143]

‘Hudson v Leigh [2009] EWHC 1306’. Royal Courts of Justice, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?oc=00240&elb=t&lni=7VYJ-BVP0-YBF6-71X9&perma=true&csi=316762&secondRedirectIndicator=true

[144]

‘Leigh v Hudson [2009] EWCA Civ 1442’. Royal Courts of Justice, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?oc=00240&elb=t&lni=7XK5-RG80-YBF6-73KP&perma=true&csi=316762&secondRedirectIndicator=true

[145]

‘MA v JA [2012] EWHC 2219 (Fam)’. 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5676-WV21-F0JY-C46B&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[146]

C. Bevan, ‘The role of intention in non-marriage cases post Hudson v Leigh’, Child and family law quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_04_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_04_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2013_04_5

[147]

Probert, Rebecca, ‘The Evolving Concept of Non-Marriage’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, no. 3, pp. 314–351, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq25&div=27&g_sent=1&collection=journals

[148]

‘Gender Recognition Act 2004’. 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61F0-TWPY-Y18X&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[149]

‘Sheffield City Council v E & Anor [2004] EWHC 2808 (Fam) (02 December 2004)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2004/2808.html

[150]

‘Wilkinson v Kitzinger and others [2006] EWHC 2022 (Fam)’. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VG31-DYBP-P0N7&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[151]

R. Harding, ‘“Wilkinson v Kitzinger” (An alternative Judgment)’, in Feminist judgments: from theory to practice, Oxford: Hart, 2010, pp. 425–430.

[152]

‘Equal marriage consultation - Consultations - GOV.UK’. Government Equalities Office, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/equal-marriage-consultation

[153]

‘R (on the application of Quila and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (on the application of Bibi and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45’. Supreme Court, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=540Y-JNJ1-F0JY-C4JF&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[154]

‘Every Family Matters: An in-depth review of family law in Britain’. The Centre for Social Justice, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/publications/every-family-matters

[155]

‘R (on the application of Baiai and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (on the application of Trzcinska and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53’. HOUSE OF LORDS, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VGC1-DYBP-P4KY&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[156]

‘P v R (Forced Marriage: Annulment) [2003] 1 FLR 661’. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661

[157]

‘B v I [2010] 1 FLR 1721 (forced marriage as non-marriage)’. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20101FLR1721.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20101FLR1721

[158]

‘NS v MI [2006] EWHC 1646 (Fam), [2007] 2 FCR 748’. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4R46-GW00-TWP1-D108&csi=274607&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[159]

‘Goodwin v United Kingdom (Application 28957/95) [2002] IRLR 664, [2002] 2 FCR 577’. ECtHR, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4R47-6YT0-TWP1-D0YN&csi=274607&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[160]

Schafer, L, ‘Marrying an in-law? The future of prohibited degrees of affinity and consanguinity in English Law’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 219–229, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq20&id=219&collection=journals&index=journals/chilflq

[161]

Lewis, Jane, ‘Marriage and Cohabitation and the Nature of Commitment’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, vol. 11, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq11&id=363&collection=journals

[162]

A. Diduck, ‘Chapter 2’, in Law’s families, vol. Law in context, London: LexisNexis, 2003.

[163]

R. Probert, Marriage law and practice in the long eighteenth century: a reassessment, vol. Cambridge studies in English legal history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

[164]

Norrie, Kenneth McK, ‘Marriage is for Heterosexuals - May the Rest of Us Be Saved From It’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, vol. 12, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq12&div=37&g_sent=1&collection=journals

[165]

‘Marriage Act 1949’. 1949 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-G0K0-TWPY-Y0ND&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[166]

S. Anitha and A. Gill, ‘Coercion, Consent and the Forced Marriage Debate in the UK’, Feminist Legal Studies, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 165–184, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10691-009-9119-4.

[167]

A choice by right : the report of the working group on forced marriage. [London]: Home Office Communications Directorate, 2000.

[168]

‘Bellinger v Bellinger (Lord Chancellor intervening) - [2003] 2 AC 467’. House of Lords, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WN0-TXD8-60S7&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[169]

‘CORBETT v. CORBETT (OTHERWISE ASHLEY) - [1971] P. 83’. 1970 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPY0-TXD6-F09Y&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[170]

‘Corbett v Corbett (otherwise Ashley) - [1970] 2 All ER 33’. 1970 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-35T0-TWP1-60SD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[171]

‘THE REES CASE [1987] 2 FLR 111’. European Court of Human Rights, 1986 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111

[172]

‘Cossey v Cossey [1991] 2 FLR 492’. European Court of Human Rights, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492

[173]

‘SHEFFIELD AND HORSHAM v UK [1998] 2 FLR 928’. European Court of Human Rights, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928

[174]

‘W v W (Nullity: Gender) [2001] 1 FLR 324’. 2001 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324

[175]

‘Gereis v Yagoub [1997] 1 FLR 854’. 1997 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854

[176]

‘Chief Adjudication Officer v Bath [2000] 1 FLR 8’. Court of Appeal, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008

[177]

‘B and L v UK [2006] 1 FLR 35’. European Court of Human Rights, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035

[178]

‘The Marriage Act 1949 (Remedial) Order 2007 No. 438’. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4SW7-STT0-TX08-H19V&csi=283307&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[179]

‘Singh v Singh [1971] P 226’. Court of Appeal, 1971 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPY0-TXD6-F0FK&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[180]

‘Hirani v Hirani [1983] 4 FLR 232’. Court of Appeal, 1982 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232

[181]

‘Vervaeke v Smith (Messina and A-G intervening) [1983] 1 AC 145, [1982] 2 All ER 144’. House of Lords, 1983 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WP0-TXD8-60P2&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[182]

‘Hyde v Hyde and Woodmansee - [1861-73] All ER Rep 175’. 1866 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FPP-FDH0-TWXJ-213C&csi=279846&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[183]

‘Gandhi v Patel et al [2002] 1 FLR 603’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603

[184]

‘BALFOUR v. BALFOUR. - [1919] 2 K.B. 571’. 1919 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4F-RWJ0-TXD5-X0ST&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[185]

J. Eekelaar, ‘Marriage: a modest proposal’, Family Law, vol. 83, no. 1, 2013.

[186]

‘Halpern et al. v. Attorney General of Canada et al. (June 10, 2003)’. 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/decisions/2003/june/halpernC39172.htm

[187]

‘Minister of Home Affairs and another v Fourie and another; Lesbian and Gay Equality Project and others v Minister of Home Affairs and others - (2005) 20 BHRC 368’, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K8Y-4HW0-TWP1-F189&csi=274794&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[188]

‘Home Affairs v Fourie [2005] ZACC 19’. CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2005/19.html

[189]

‘United States v Windsor 570 US 2013’. Supreme Court of the United States, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/12

[190]

R. Auchmuty, ‘What’s so special about marriage? The Impact of Wilkinson v Kitzinger’, Child and family law quarterly, vol. 20, no. 4, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_12_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_12_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_12_3

[191]

P. Tatchell, ‘Why our new same-sex marriage is not yet equal marriage’, New statesman, Jul. 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.newstatesman.com/uk-politics/2013/07/why-our-new-same-sex-marriage-not-yet-equal-marriage

[192]

‘Civil Partnership Act 2004’. 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-FBY0-TWPY-Y055&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[193]

‘Equality Act 2010 section 202’. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7Y7R-3430-Y97X-73G2&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[194]

‘*Vallianatos v Greece (Application nos 29381/09 and 32684/09)’. European Court of Human Rights, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-128294#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-128294%22]}

[195]

N. Bamforth, ‘The benefits of marriage in all but name? Same sex couples and the Civil Partnership Act 2004’, Child and family law quarterly, vol. 19, no. 2, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_06_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_06_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2007_06_1

[196]

C. Stychin, ‘*Family Friendly?: Rights, Responsibilities and Relationship Recognition’, in Feminist perspectives on family law, Abingdon: Routledge-Cavendish, 2006.

[197]

L. Crompton, ‘The Civil Partnerships Bill 2004: The Illusion of Equality’, Family law, vol. 34, no. 12, 2004.

[198]

B. Hale, ‘Homosexual Rights’, Child and family law quarterly, vol. 16, no. 2, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2004_03_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2004_03_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2004_03_1

[199]

‘Civil Partnership: A Framework for the legal recognition of same-sex couples’. Department of Trade and Industry, Jun. 2003 [Online]. Available: https://web.archive.org/web/20030801141524/http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/research/index.htm#civilpartnerships

[200]

‘*Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown (Overview)’. The Law Commission, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm

[201]

‘*Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown’. The Law Commission, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm

[202]

‘Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30’. HOUSE OF LORDS, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFS1-DYBP-P11K&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[203]

A. Barlow and G. James, ‘*Regulating Marriage and Cohabitation in 21st Century Britain’, Modern Law Review, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 143–176, Mar. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00482.x.

[204]

‘CM v STS [2008] CSOH 125 (2 September 2008)’. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2008CSOH125.html

[205]

J. Miles, F. Wasoff, and E. Mordaunt, ‘Reforming family law – the case of cohabitation: “things may not work out as you expect”’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 167–177, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.1080/09649069.2012.718532.

[206]

G. Douglas, J. Pearce, and H. Woodward, ‘Cohabitants, Property and the Law: A Study of Injustice’, Modern Law Review, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 24–47, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00732.x.

[207]

A. Barlow, Cohabitation, marriage and the law: social change and legal reform in the 21st century. Oxford: Hart, 2005.

[208]

R. Deech, ‘Cohabitant’, Family law, vol. 40, no. 1, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2010_01_31.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2010_01_31&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2010_01_31

[209]

Lewis, Jane, ‘Marriage and Cohabitation and the Nature of Commitment’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 4, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq11&div=40&g_sent=1&collection=journals

[210]

S. Parker, Informal marriage, cohabitation and the law, 1750-1989. London: Macmillan, 1990.

[211]

‘Re J (Income Support: Cohabitation) [1995] 1 FLR 660’. 1995 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660

[212]

M. D. A. Freeman and C. M. Lyon, Cohabitation without marriage: an essay in law and social policy. Aldershot: Gower, 1983.

[213]

R. Deech, ‘The Case Against the Legal Recognition of Cohabitation’, in Marriage and cohabitation in contemporary societies: areas of legal, social and ethical change, Toronto: Butterworths, 1980.

[214]

A. Diduck and F. Kaganas, ‘Chapter 12’, in Family law, gender and the state, 3rd ed., Oxford: Hart, 2012.

[215]

J. Herring, ‘Chapter 6’, in Family law, 6th ed., vol. Longman law series, Harlow: Pearson, 2013.

[216]

S. Harris-Short and J. Miles, ‘Chapter 4’, in Family law: text, cases, and materials, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

[217]

‘New government domestic violence and abuse definition’, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/new-government-domestic-violence-and-abuse-definition

[218]

‘Family Law Act 1996 Part IV’. [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61P0-TWPY-Y1F8&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[219]

‘Protection from Harassment Act 1997’. 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-HC70-TWPY-Y0CJ&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[220]

‘Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004’. 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61F0-TWPY-Y0BK&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[221]

‘Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007’. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-HC60-TWPY-Y0KY&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[222]

‘Crime and Security Act 2010’. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7Y7B-PJM0-Y97X-74GB&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[223]

‘Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014’. 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BS9-MNJ1-DYCN-C2CP&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[224]

‘B v B (Occupation Order) [1999] 1 FLR 715’. Court of Appeal, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715

[225]

‘Chalmers v Johns [1999] 1 FLR 392’. Court of Appeal [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392

[226]

‘Mark John Smith v R [2012] EWCA Crim 2566’. 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2012/2566.html

[227]

‘Burris v Azadani - [1995] 4 All ER 802’. 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60YF&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[228]

House of Lords, R v Ireland, R v Burstow [1997] 3 WLR 534. 1997 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I4DA7AC70E42811DA8FC2A0F0355337E9/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true

[229]

‘R v Hills [2001] 1 FLR 580’. Court of Appeal, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580

[230]

‘Lau v Director of Public Prosecutions [2000] 1 FLR 799’. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799

[231]

‘R v Colohan [2001] EWCA Crim 1251’. 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2001/1251.html

[232]

J. Harris, ‘An Evaluation of the Use and Effectiveness of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997’. Home Office, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/hors2000.html

[233]

O. Bowcott, ‘Stalking prosecutions rise by 20% under new law on harassment | Law | The Guardian’, The guardian, Sep. 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/sep/11/stalking-prosecutions-rise-new-law-cps-acpo-victim-support

[234]

‘C v C [1998] Fam 70’. 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPX0-TXD6-F1C5&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

[235]

‘Chechi v Bashier [1999] 2 FLR 489’. Court of Appeal, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0489.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0489

[236]

‘G v F (Non-Molestation Order : Jurisdiction), [2000] 2 FLR 533’. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20002FLR0533.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20002FLR0533

[237]

‘P v P (Contempt of Court: Mental Capacity) [1999] 2 FLR 897’. Court of Appeal, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0897.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0897

[238]

‘Banks v Banks [1999] 1 FLR 726’. 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2Gdn5Ctm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[239]

‘H v O (Contempt of Court: Sentencing) [2004] EWCA Civ 1691’. 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGtm2KJn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[240]

M. Burton, ‘Civil law remedies for domestic violence: why are applications for non-molestation orders declining?’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 109–120, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1080/09649060903043497.

[241]

‘Dolan v Corby  [2011] EWCA (Civ) 1664’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GtmYmJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[242]

‘Richards v Richards  (1983)  2  All  ER  807’. 1983 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[243]

Kaganas, Felicity, ‘B v B (Occupation Order) and Chalmers v Johns Occupation Orders under the Family Law Act 1996’, Child and Family Law Quarterly, vol. 11, no. 2, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/chilflq11&id=197&collection=journals&index=journals/chilflq

[244]

‘G v G (Occupation Order: Conduct) [2000] 2 FLR 36’. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGZnZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[245]

‘Murray v Robinson [2006] 1FLR 365’. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2mZn0qtmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[246]

A. Kazimirski et al., ‘Forced marriage: prevalence and service response’. National Centre for Social Research, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.natcen.ac.uk/our-research/research/forced-marriage/

[247]

N. Pearce and A. Gill, ‘Criminalising Forced Marriage Through Stand alone Legislation: Will it Work?’, Family law, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 534–542, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_05_30.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_05_30&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_05_30

[248]

‘*Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 3’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3mZm1GJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[249]

S. Choudhry and J. Herring, ‘Chapter 9’, in European human rights and family law, Oxford: Hart, 2010.

[250]

‘Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police v Van Colle [2008] UKHL 50’. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZnYetnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[251]

M. Burton, ‘Failing to Protect: Victims’ Rights and Police Liability’, Modern Law Review, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 283–295, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00744.x.

[252]

J. Platt, ‘The Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 Part 1: Is it Working?’, Family law, vol. 38, no. 7, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2008_07_53.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2008_07_53&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2008_07_53

[253]

R. P. Dobash, ‘Women’s Violence to Men in Intimate Relationships: Working on a Puzzle’, British Journal of Criminology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 324–349, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1093/bjc/azh026.

[254]

A. Finney, ‘Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the 2004/5 British Crime Survey Summary’. Home Office, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/onlinepubs1.html

[255]

‘Call to end violence against women and girls’. TSO, London, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/call-to-end-violence-against-women-and-girls

[256]

M. Hester, ‘Who does what to whom? Gender and domestic violence perpetrators in English police records’, European Journal of Criminology, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 623–637, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1177/1477370813479078.

[257]

S. Walby and J. Allen, ‘Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey’. Home Office, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/hors2004.html

[258]

‘Hale v Tanner [2000] 2 FLR 879’. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[259]

‘Nwogbe v Nwogbe [2000] 2 FLR 744’. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[260]

C. Humphreys and R. K. Thiara, ‘Neither justice nor protection: women’s experiences of post‐separation violence’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 195–214, Sep. 2003, doi: 10.1080/0964906032000145948.

[261]

K. Paradine and J. Wilkinson, A research and literature review. Protection and accountability: the reporting, investigation and prosecution of domestic violence cases. [England: National Centre for Policing Excellence, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/cjji/inspections/violence-at-home-a-joint-thematic-inspection-of-the-investigation-and-prosecution-of-cases-involving-domestic-violence/#.VSaKF_A71wA

[262]

R. E. Dobash and R. P. Dobash, ‘The Politics and Policies of Responding to Violence Against Women’, in Home truths about domestic violence: feminist influences on policy and practice : a reader, London: Routledge, 2000.

[263]

‘Law’s Progressive Potential: The Value of Engagement with the Law for Domestic Violence’, Social & Legal Studies, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 105–130, Mar. 2001 [Online]. Available: http://sls.sagepub.com/content/10/1/105.abstract

[264]

Great Britain, The Law Commission (Law Com. No. 207). Family law: domestic violence and occupation of the family home. [London: House of Commons?], 1992 [Online]. Available: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&res_dat=xri:hcpp&rft_dat=xri:hcpp:rec:1992-091023

[265]

M. Freeman, ‘Legal Ideologies; patriarchal precedents and domestic violence’, in The State, the law, and the family, vol. Social science paperback, London: Tavistock, 1984.

[266]

M. Hayes, ‘Non-Molestation Protection: Only Associated Persons Need Apply’, Family law, vol. 26, 1996.

[267]

C. Itzin, ‘Gendering Domestic Violence: The Influence of Feminsim on Policy and Practice’, in Home truths about domestic violence: feminist influences on policy and practice : a reader, London: Routledge, 2000.

[268]

‘Strengthening the law on domestic abuse - Consultations - Summary of responses’. Home Office, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/strengthening-the-law-on-domestic-abuse

[269]

‘Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 ss 1 – 10A’. 1973 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmJmZKJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[270]

‘Civil Partnership Act 2004 ss 44 - 48’. 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidn3KJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[271]

A. Diduck and F. Kaganas, ‘Chapter 3’, in Family law, gender and the state, 3rd ed., Oxford: Hart, 2012.

[272]

J. Herring, ‘Chapter 3’, in Family law, 6th ed., vol. Longman law series, Harlow: Pearson, 2013.

[273]

S. Harris-Short and J. Miles, ‘Chapter 5’, in Family law: text, cases, and materials, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

[274]

‘Pheasant v Pheasant [1972] 1 All ER 587’. 1972 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[275]

‘Buffery v Buffery [1988] 2 FLR 365’. 1987 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[276]

‘Cleary v Cleary [1974] 1 All ER 498’. 1974 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm2CJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[277]

‘Carr v Carr [1974] 1 All ER 1193’. 1974 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm4GdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[278]

‘Ash v Ash [1972] 1 All ER 582’. 1972 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[279]

‘Pheasant v Pheasant [1972] 1 All ER 587’. 1972 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[280]

‘Thurlow v Thurlow [1975] 2 All ER 979’. 1975 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmXqZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[281]

‘Bradley v Bradley [1973] 3 All ER 750’. 1973 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udnYCdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[282]

‘Buffery v Buffery [1988] 2 FLR 365’. 1987 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[283]

‘Livingstone-Stollard v Livingstone-Stollard [1974] Fam 47’. 1974 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm1qdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[284]

‘Butterworth v Butterworth [1997] 2 FLR 336’. 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtm4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[285]

‘Birch v Birch [1992] 1 FLR 564’. 1992 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[286]

‘Perry v Perry [1963] 3 All ER 766’. 1963 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udo0mZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[287]

‘Glenister v Glenister [1945] P 30’. 1945 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CdnXCZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha/glenister-v-glenister

[288]

‘Dunn v Dunn [1967] P 217’. 1967 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZn5uJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[289]

‘Stringfellow v Stringfellow [1976] 2 All ER 539’. 1976 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmWiZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[290]

‘Pardy v Pardy [1939] P 288’. 1939 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2Ctn2CZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[291]

‘Slawson v Slawson [1942] 2 All ER 527’. 1942 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGdn3iZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[292]

‘Santos v Santos [1972] 2 All ER 246’. 1972 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0GdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[293]

‘Mouncer v Mouncer [ 1972] 1 All ER 289’. 1972 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn1CJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[294]

‘Parker v Parker [1972] 1 All ER 410’. 1972 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0iZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[295]

‘Rukat v Rukat [1975] 1 All ER 343’. 1974 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmYatmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[296]

‘Grenfell v Grenfell [1978] Fam 128’. 1977 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJm1eJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[297]

‘Archer v Archer [ 1999] 1 FLR 327’. 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYydmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[298]

‘K v K (Financial relief: Widow’s Pension) [1997] 1 FLR 35’. 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidm4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[299]

‘Wickler v Wickler [1998] 2 FLR 326’. 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[300]

G. Douglas et al., ‘The Role of Religious Tribunals in Regulating Marriage and Divorce’, Child and family law quarterly, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 139–157, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_02_1.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_02_1&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2012_02_1

[301]

G. Douglas et al, ‘Accommodating Religious Divorce in the Secular State: A Case-Study Analysis’, in Families: Deviance, Diversity and the Law, Hart Publishing, 2013, pp. 185–201.

[302]

R. Sandberg, G. Douglas, N. Doe, S. Gilliat-Ray, and A. Khan, ‘Britain’s Religious Tribunals: “Joint Governance” in Practice’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 263–291, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqs031.

[303]

A. Diduck, ‘*Chapter 3’, in Law’s families, vol. Law in context, London: LexisNexis, 2003.

[304]

H. Reece, Divorcing responsibly. Oxford: Hart, 2003.

[305]

‘Looking to the future: mediation and the ground for divorce the Government’s proposals - Publications - GOV.UK’. London, 1995 [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/looking-to-the-future-mediation-and-the-ground-for-divorce-the-governments-proposals

[306]

‘Family Law Act 1996’. 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYiZnXqdm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[307]

‘Supporting Families: A consultation document’. Home Office, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ERORecords/HO/421/2/P2/ACU/SUPPFAM.HTM

[308]

J. Eekelaar, ‘Family Justice: Ideal or Illusion?: Family Law and Communitarian Values’, Current Legal Problems, vol. 48, no. Part 2, pp. 191–216, Jan. 1995, doi: 10.1093/clp/48.Part_2.191.

[309]

S. Cretney, ‘Divorce Reform in England: Humbug and Hypocrisy or a Smooth Transition?’, in Divorce: where next?, vol. Issues in law and society, Aldershot, Hants: Dartmouth Pub. Co, 1996.

[310]

R. Deech, ‘*Divorce – A Disaster?’, Family law, vol. 39, no. 11, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_11_48.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_11_48&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_11_48

[311]

C. Smart and B. Neale, ‘*Good enough morality? Divorce and postmodernity’, Critical Social Policy, vol. 17, no. 53, pp. 3–27, Nov. 1997, doi: 10.1177/026101839701705301.

[312]

J. Dewar, ‘*The Normal Chaos of Family Law’, Modern Law Review, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 467–485, Jul. 1998, doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00157.

[313]

S. D. Sclater and C. Piper, ‘*The Family Law Act 1996 in Context’, in Undercurrents of divorce, Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 1999.

[314]

G. Douglas et al., ‘Supporting Children when Parents Separate - A Neglected Family Justice or Mental Health Issue?’, Child and family law quarterly, vol. 8, no. 2, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1996_02_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1996_02_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1996_02_3

[315]

S. D. Sclater, ‘*Narratives of divorce’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 423–441, Oct. 1997, doi: 10.1080/09649069708410209.

[316]

S. D. Sclater, Divorce: a psychosocial study. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, 1999.

[317]

S. D. Sclater and J. Brown, ‘Divorce: A Psychodynamic Perspective’, in Undercurrents of divorce, Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 1999.

[318]

S. D. Sclater, ‘Experiences of Divorce’, in Undercurrents of divorce, Aldershot, England: Ashgate, 1999.

[319]

R. Collier, ‘The Dashing of a “Liberal Dream”? - The Information Meeting, The “New Family” and the Limits of Law’, Child and family law quarterly, vol. 11, no. 3, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_03_4.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_03_4&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_03_4

[320]

J. Eekelaar, ‘*Family Law: Keeping us “On Message”’, Child and family law quarterly, vol. 11, no. 4, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_04_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_04_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_1999_04_5

[321]

S. D. Sclater and C. Piper, ‘*Re-moralising the Family? – Family Policy, Family Law and Youth Justice’, Child and family law quarterly, vol. 12, no. 2, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_02_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_02_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2000_02_3

[322]

H. Reece, ‘*Divorcing Responsibly’, Feminist Legal Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 65–91, 2000, doi: 10.1023/A:1009283815775.

[323]

H. Reece, ‘Divorcing the Children’, in Feminist perspectives on child law, vol. Feminist perspectives in law, London: Cavendish, 2000.

[324]

J. Eekelaar, S. Beinart, and M. Maclean, Family lawyers: the divorce work of solicitors. Oxford: Hart, 2000.

[325]

J. Walker et al., ‘Picking up the Pieces: Marriage and Divorce: Two years after Information Provision’. Department for Constitutional Affairs, London, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dca.gov.uk/pubs/reports/family2004-webpageintro.htm

[326]

‘Responses to Civil Partnership: A framework for the legal recognition of same-sex couples’. DTI, London, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20040105034450/http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/research/index.htm#cp_responses

[327]

‘Matrimonial Causes Act 1973’. 1973 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmJmZKJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[328]

‘Civil Partnership Act 2004’. 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidn3KJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[329]

A. Diduck and F. Kaganas, ‘Chapter 7’, in Family law, gender and the state, 3rd ed., Oxford: Hart, 2012.

[330]

J. Herring, ‘Chapter 5’, in Family law, 6th ed., vol. Longman law series, Harlow: Pearson, 2013.

[331]

S. Harris-Short and J. Miles, ‘Chapter 7’, in Family law: text, cases, and materials, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

[332]

‘White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981’. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white

[333]

‘Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24’. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

[334]

‘Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503’. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdnYuto2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[335]

‘Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements - Law Commission’. Law Commission, London, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/publications/matrimonial-property.htm

[336]

‘Suter v Suter [1987] 2 FLR 232’. 1986 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[337]

‘Re A [1998] 1 FLR 347’. 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[338]

‘*B v B (Financial Provision Welfare of Child and Conduct) [2002] 1 FLR 555’. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[339]

‘Prest v Petrodel Resources and others [2013] UKSC 34’. 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5yJn5itm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[340]

R. George, ‘Family finances and the corporate veil: Prest v Petrodel’, Family Law, vol. 43, no. 8, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_08_61.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_08_61&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_08_61

[341]

‘Sharland v Sharland [2014] EWCA 95’. 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5GJm5adn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[342]

‘Delaney v Delaney [1990] 2 FLR 457’. 1990 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457

[343]

‘Leadbeater v Leadbeater [1985] FLR 789’. 1985 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo1mJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[344]

‘P v P (Divorce: Financial Provision Clean Break) [2002] EWCA Civ 1886; [2003] 1 FLR 942’. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZiJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/parra-v-parra

[345]

‘N v F [2011] EWHC 586 (pre-acquired wealth)’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3udoWqJm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[346]

‘*Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3mZm3ytmYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/jones-v-jones

[347]

‘Y v Y (financial orders inherited wealth) [2012] EWHC Fam 2063’. 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uJn3mdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[348]

‘SK v WL (post separation accrual] [2011] 1 FLR 1471’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3uZm1qJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[349]

‘*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24’. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

[350]

‘*Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503’. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdnYuto2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[351]

‘Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171’. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3itm3GtoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/robson-v-robson

[352]

‘K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3eJn2udo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[353]

‘McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707’. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[354]

‘North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760’. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZaJm1Kto1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[355]

‘Dart v Dart [1996] 2 FLR 286’. 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYetn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[356]

‘P v P (Inherited property) [2004] EWHC 1364; [2005] 1 FLR 576’. 2004 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm3yZm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[357]

‘Grey v Grey [2009] EWCA Civ 1424’. 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3aJm3Ctn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[358]

‘SA v PA [2014] EWCA 392’. 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXatmZuZmXqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa

[359]

‘H v H [2014] EWHC 760’. 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXadm3uJmWedlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa

[360]

‘White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981’. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white

[361]

‘Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24’. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

[362]

‘Preston v Preston (1982) Fam 17’. 1982 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXiZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[363]

‘McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707’. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[364]

‘Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24’. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

[365]

‘McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707’. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[366]

‘White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981’. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white

[367]

‘*C v C (Financial Relief: Short Marriage) [1997] 2 FLR 26’. 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYitoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[368]

‘Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24’. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

[369]

‘*White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981’. 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white

[370]

‘*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24’. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

[371]

‘B v B (Mesher Order) [2002] EWHC 3106 (Fam); [2003] 2 FLR 285’. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm1eZn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[372]

‘*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24’. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

[373]

‘Wachtel v Wachtel [1973] Fam 72’. 1973 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm5GJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[374]

‘K v L [2010] EWCA Civ 125 (Child sexual abuse)’. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qdn3CdoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[375]

‘Vaughn v Vaughn (financial misconduct) [2007] EWCA Civ 1085’. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZado0adn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[376]

‘K v K [1990] 2 FLR 225’. 1990 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXeZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[377]

‘Clark v Clark [1999] 2 FLR 498’. 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCJm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[378]

‘Kokosinski v Kokosinski [1980] 1 All ER 1106’. 1980 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo0edlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa

[379]

‘H v H (Financial Relief: Attempted Murder as Conduct) [2006] 1 FLR 990’. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCZm5mtnWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[380]

‘T v T (Financial relief: Pensions) [1998] 1 FLR 1072’. 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYqZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[381]

‘C v C (Financial Relief: Short Marriage) [1997] 2 FLR 26’. 1997 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYitoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[382]

‘Suter v Suter [1987] 2 All ER 336’. 1987 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha

[383]

‘Mawson v Mawson [1994] 2 FLR 985’. 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXCto1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[384]

‘K v K (Ancillary Relief: Prenuptial Agreement) [2003] 1 FLR 120’. 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZitm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[385]

‘K v K (Periodical Payment: Cohabitation) [2006] 2 FLR 468’. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn2iZm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[386]

‘Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24’. 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break

[387]

‘Martin v Martin [1978] Fam 12’. 1977 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn4Gto4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[388]

‘Clutton v Clutton [1991] 1 All ER 340’. 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXetoZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[389]

‘Mesher v Mesher and Hall [1980] 1 All ER 126’. 1980 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCZn1adoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[390]

‘Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360’. 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uZmWGZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/piglowski-v-piglowski

[391]

‘B v B (Mesher Order) [2002] EWHC 3106 (Fam); [2003] 2 FLR 285’. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm1eZn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[392]

‘Richardson v Richardson [1978] 9 Fam Law 86’. 1978 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZidm4Ctn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[393]

‘T v T (Financial relief: Pensions) [1998] 1 FLR 1072’. 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYqZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[394]

‘S v S [2002] 1 FLR 457’. 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZedm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/s-v-s-rescission-of-decree-nisi-pension-sharing-provision

[395]

‘Do Divorced Women Catch Up in Pension Building?’, Child and family law quarterly, vol. 14, no. 2, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2002_02_3.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2002_02_3&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2002_02_3

[396]

D. PRICE, ‘Closing the Gender Gap in Retirement Income: What Difference Will Recent UK Pension Reforms Make?’, Journal of Social Policy, vol. 36, no. 04, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.1017/S0047279407001183.

[397]

D. Price, ‘Pension Accumulation and Gendered Household Structures’, in Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study, Oxford: Hart Pub, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847315274

[398]

‘Xydias v Xydias [1999] 1 FLR 683 – general policy’. 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYyZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[399]

‘Soulsbury v Soulsbury [2007] EWCA Civ 969’. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXytm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[400]

‘Edgar v Edgar [1980] 1 WLR 1410’. 1980 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa

[401]

‘MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64’. 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido0mJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/macleod-v-macleod

[402]

‘Crossley v Crossley [2007] EWCA Civ 1491’. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetn5Cto4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[403]

‘*Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA 649’. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZn4adn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[404]

‘Z v Z (No 2) [2011] EWHC 2878’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qdn2udm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[405]

‘B v S [2012] EWHC 265’. 2012 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4aJnXKZn3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[406]

‘V v V [2011] EWHC 3230’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GZmYKdo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[407]

‘SA v PA (pre-marital agreement) [2014] EWCA 392’. 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXatmZuZmXqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa

[408]

P. Pavlou, ‘Pre-Nuptial Agreements – Back Where we Were? Kremen v Agrest’, Family law, vol. 42, no. 8, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_08_40.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_08_40&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2012_08_40

[409]

‘Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17’. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2mZn0itnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha/stack-v-dowden

[410]

‘Jones v Kernott  [2011] UKSC 53’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2GdnZuto0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[411]

‘Consultation Paper No 179: Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown (Overview)’. Law Commission, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm

[412]

‘Supplementary Consultation Paper Matrimonial Property,Needs and Agreements’. Law Commission, London, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/consultations/matrimonial_property.htm

[413]

‘*V v V [2011] EWHC 3230’. 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GZmYKdo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[414]

‘McFarlane v McFarlane (no 2) [2009] EWHC 891’. 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CdoXGJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[415]

‘GW v RW (Financial provision: Departure From Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108’. 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCto3CdoZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[416]

‘MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64’. 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido0mJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/macleod-v-macleod

[417]

‘Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA 649’. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZn4adn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[418]

‘H v H [2007] EWHC 459 (Fam)’. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKtn4ytn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[419]

‘S v S [2007] EWHC 1975 (Fam)’. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCJnXeJn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[420]

‘B v B [2008] EWCA Civ 543’. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXmZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/b-v-b-ancillary-relief-distribution-of-assets

[421]

‘VB v JP [ 2008] EWHC 112’. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZeJn1qdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[422]

‘Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360’. 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uZmWGZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/piglowski-v-piglowski

[423]

‘McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707’. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[424]

‘Myerson v. Myerson (2009) 1 FLR 826’. 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido1iZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[425]

J. Miles, ‘*Charman v Charman: making sense of need, compensation and equal sharing after Miller/McFarlane’, Child and family law quarterly, vol. 20, no. 3, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_03_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_03_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2008_03_5

[426]

A. Diduck, ‘*Ancillary Relief: Complicating the Search for Principle’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 272–300, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6478.2011.00543.x.

[427]

S. Leech and R. Young, ‘Marriage, divorce and ancillary relief under the Human Rights Act 1998: an introduction’, in European human rights law review, no. 3, 2001, pp. 300–311 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I8497AF10E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true

[428]

G. Douglas and A. Perry, ‘How parents cope financially on separation and divorce- implications for the future of ancillary relief’, Child and family law quarterly, vol. 13, no. 1, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2001_01_5.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2001_01_5&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2001_01_5

[429]

J. Eekelaar, ‘Back to Basics and Forward into the Unknown’, Family law, vol. 31, no. 1, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_27.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_27&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_27

[430]

A. Diduck, ‘Fairness and Justice for All? The House of Lords in White v. White [2000] 2 F.L.R. 981’, Feminist Legal Studies, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 173–183, 2001, doi: 10.1023/A:1016744705288.

[431]

A. Diduck, ‘Chapter 6’, in Law’s families, vol. Law in context, London: LexisNexis, 2003.

[432]

S. Cretney, ‘The Family and the Law – Status or Contract?’, Child and family law quarterly, vol. 15, no. 4, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2003_04_6.dita.xml&docid=Family_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2003_04_6&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_CFLQONLINE_CFLQ_2003_04_6

[433]

S. Edwards, ‘Division of Assets and Fairness - `Brick Lane’ – Gender, Culture and Ancillary Relief on Divorce’, Family law, vol. 34, no. 11, 2004.

[434]

J. Eekelaar, ‘Asset distribution on divorce - the durational element’, Law quarterly review, vol. 117, no. Oct, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&returnto=https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I79FFBD40E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true

[435]

J. Eekelaar, ‘Asset Distribution on Divorce – Time and Property’, Family law, vol. 33, no. 11, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2003_11_29.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2003_11_29&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2003_11_29

[436]

J. Herring, ‘Why Financial Orders on Divorce should be Unfair’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 218–228, Aug. 2005, doi: 10.1093/lawfam/ebi016.

[437]

P. Symes, ‘INDISSOLUBILITY AND THE CLEAN BREAK’, The Modern Law Review, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 44–60, Jan. 1985, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1985.tb00825.x.

[438]

John Eekelaar, ‘Equality and the Purpose of Maintenance’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 188–200, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410053?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[439]

A. Diduck and H. Orton, ‘Equality and Support for Spouses’, The Modern Law Review, vol. 57, no. 5, pp. 681–702, Sep. 1994, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.1994.tb01969.x.

[440]

A. Diduck, ‘*What is Family Law For?’, Current Legal Problems, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 287–314, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1093/clp/cur010.

[441]

B. Hale, ‘*Equality and autonomy in family law’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 3–14, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1080/09649069.2011.571466.

[442]

M. Thorpe, ‘London- The Divorce Capital of the World’, Family law, vol. 39, no. 1, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_01_24.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_01_24&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_01_24

[443]

R. Deech, ‘What’s a Woman Worth?’, Family law, vol. 39, no. 12, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_12_27.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_12_27&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2009_12_27

[444]

L. Ferguson, ‘*Family, Social Inequalities, and the Persuasive Force of Interpersonal Obligation’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 61–90, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1093/lawfam/ebm015.

[445]

L. Glennon, ‘*The limitations of equality discourses on the contours of intimate relations’, in Rights, gender and family law, Abingdon: Routledge, 2010.

[446]

E. Hitchings, ‘*Chaos or Consistency? Ancillary Relief in the “Everyday” Case’, in Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study, Oxford: Hart Pub, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://shib-idp.ucl.ac.uk/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781847315274

[447]

S. Ouazzani, ‘Prenuptial agreements: the implications of gender’, Family law, vol. 43, no. 4, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_04_56.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_04_56&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2013_04_56

[448]

J. Herring, ‘Chapter 5’, in Family law, 6th ed., vol. Longman law series, Harlow: Pearson, 2013.

[449]

A. Diduck and F. Kaganas, ‘Chapter 7’, in Family law, gender and the state, 3rd ed., Oxford: Hart, 2012.

[450]

S. Harris-Short and J. Miles, ‘Chapter 6’, in Family law: text, cases, and materials, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.

[451]

‘Supporting Separated Families, Securing Children’s Futures: A Public Consultation Document’. DWP, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/supporting-separated-families-securing-children-s-futures

[452]

‘Government response to the consultation: Supporting separated families: securing children’s futures’. DWP, 2013 [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/supporting-separated-families-securing-children-s-futures

[453]

G. Douglas et al., ‘Contact is not a Commodity to be Bartered for Money’, Family law, vol. 41, no. 5, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2011_05_44.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2011_05_44&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2011_05_44

[454]

‘R. (on the application of Kehoe) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 48; [2004] EWCA Civ 225; [2004] 1 FLR 1132 (on enforcement).’ 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZmtm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[455]

‘R (Rowley and others) v Sec State for Work and Pensions [ 2007] EWCA Civ 598’. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZatn5yto3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[456]

‘T v B [2010] EWHC 1444 (Fam)’. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3idmZitn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[457]

‘Re A (child of the Family) [1998] 1 FLR 347’. 1998 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[458]

‘Re C (A Minor) (child Support Agency: Disclosure) [1995] 1 FLR 201’. 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJn0CdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa

[459]

‘Re E (A Minor) (child Support: Blood Test) [1994] 2 FLR 548’. 1994 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXCdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[460]

‘J v C (Child: Financial Provision) [1999] 1 FLR 152’. 1999 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudo1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[461]

‘Re P (A Child) (Financial provision) [2003] 2 FLR 865’. 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo1uZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[462]

‘Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Jones [2004] 1 FLR. 282’. 2003 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm4Ktn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[463]

‘Treharne v. Sec of State for W&P [2009] 1 FLR 853’. 2008 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido5mZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[464]

‘Brookes v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 420’. 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2KZn1iZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF

[465]

C. Bryson, I. M. Ellman, S. McKay, and J. Miles, ‘Child Maintenance: How Much Should the State Require Fathers to Pay When Families Separate?’ 2013.

[466]

C. Skinner, ‘Child Maintenance Reforms: Understanding Fathers’ Expressive Agency and the Power of Reciprocity’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 242–265, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1093/lawfam/ebt005.

[467]

‘Strengthening Families, Promoting Parental Responsibility: the future of child maintenance Cm 7990’. DWP, London, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/strengthening-families-promoting-parental-responsibility-the-future-of-child-maintenance

[468]

D. Henshaw, ‘Recovering Child Support: routes to responsibility’. DWP, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/recovering-child-support-routes-to-responsibility

[469]

A. Diduck, ‘Chapter 7’, in Law’s families, vol. Law in context, London: LexisNexis, 2003.

[470]

N. Wikeley, ‘Private Cases and the Child Support Agency’, Family law, vol. 31, no. 1, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?c=t&action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_28.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_28&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLJONLINE_FLJ_2001_01_28

[471]

R. Collier, ‘The Campaign Against the Child Support Act: “Errant Fathers and Family Men”’, Family law, vol. 24, pp. 384–387, 1994.

[472]

Alison Diduck, ‘The Unmodified Family: The Child Support Act and the Construction of Legal Subjects’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 527–548, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1410613?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents

[473]

M. MACLEAN and J. EEKELAAR, ‘CHILD SUPPORT: THE BRITISH SOLUTION’, ‘International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family’, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 205–229, 1993, doi: 10.1093/lawfam/7.2.205.

[474]

S. Altman, ‘A Theory of Child Support’, International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 173–210, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1093/lawfam/17.2.173.