1.
Oldham, M.: Blackstone’s statutes on family law 2014-2015. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014).
2.
Herring, J.: Family law. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
3.
Lowe, N.V., Douglas, G., Bromley, P.M.: Bromley’s family law. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007).
4.
Masson, J.M., Bailey-Harris, R.J., Probert, R., Cretney, S.M.: Cretney principles of family law. Sweet & Maxwell, London (2008).
5.
Diduck, A.: Law’s families. LexisNexis, London (2003).
6.
George, R.H.: Ideas and debates in family law. Hart, Oxford (2012).
7.
Herring, J., Probert, R., Gilmore, S.: Great debates in family law. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
8.
Choudhry, S., Herring, J.: European human rights and family law. Hart, Oxford (2010).
9.
Gilmore, S., Herring, J., Probert, R.: Landmark cases in family law. Hart, Oxford (2011).
10.
Diduck, A., Kaganas, F.: Family law, gender and the state. Hart, Oxford (2012).
11.
Harris-Short, S., Miles, J.: Family law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
12.
Hale, B.: The family, law & society. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
13.
Archard, D.: Children: Rights and Childhood. Taylor and Francis, Hoboken (2004).
14.
Archard, D.: Children, family, and the state. Ashgate, Aldershot (2003).
15.
Bainham, A.: Children and their families: contact, rights and welfare. Hart, Oxford (2003).
16.
Barker, N.: Not the marrying kind: a feminist critique of same-sex marriage. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2012).
17.
Barlow, A.: Cohabitation, marriage and the law: social change and legal reform in the 21st century. Hart, Oxford (2005).
18.
Bernstein, A.: Marriage proposals: questioning a legal status. New York University Press, New York (2006).
19.
Bradley, D.: Family law and political culture: (Scandinavian laws in comparative perspective). Sweet & Maxwell, London (1996).
20.
Monk, D., Bridgeman, J.: Feminist perspectives on child law. Cavendish, London (2000).
21.
Bridgeman, J., Lind, C., Keating, H.M.: Responsibility, law and the family. Ashgate, Aldershot (2008).
22.
Bridgeman, J., Keating, H.M., Lind, C.: Regulating family responsibilities. Ashgate, Farnham (2011).
23.
Burton, M.: Legal responses to domestic violence. Routledge-Cavendish, London (2008).
24.
Carling, A.H., Duncan, S., Edwards, R.: Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. Routledge, London (2002).
25.
Collier, R., Sheldon, S.: Fragmenting fatherhood: a socio-legal study. Hart, Oxford (2008).
26.
Cretney, S.: Family Law in the Twentieth Century. Oxford University Press (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199280919.001.0001.
27.
Sclater, S.D.: Divorce: a psychosocial study. Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants, England (1999).
28.
Piper, C., Sclater, S.D.: Undercurrents of divorce. Ashgate, Aldershot, England (1999).
29.
Diduck, A.: Marriage and cohabitation. Ashgate, Aldershot (2008).
30.
Diduck, A., O’Donovan, K.: Feminist perspectives on family law. Routledge-Cavendish, Abingdon (2006).
31.
Dobash, R.E., Cavanagh, K.: Changing violent men. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, Calif (2000).
32.
Donzelot, J., Hurley, R.: The policing of families. Hutchinson, London.
33.
Lowe, N.V., Douglas, G.: The continuing evolution of family law. Family Law, Bristol (2009).
34.
Eekelaar, J.: Family Law and Personal Life. Oxford University Press (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535422.001.0001.
35.
Eekelaar, J., Maclean, M.: Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Hart Publishing, Oxford (2013).
36.
Eskridge, W.N.: Equality practice: civil unions and the future of gay rights. Routledge, New York (2002).
37.
Finch, J., Mason, J.: Negotiating family responsibilities. Routledge (1992).
38.
Fineman, M.: The illusion of equality: the rhetoric and reality of divorce reform. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1991).
39.
Fineman, M.: The neutered mother, the sexual family, and other twentieth century tragedies. Routledge, New York (1995).
40.
Fineman, M.: The autonomy myth: a theory of dependency. New Press, New York (2004).
41.
Fortin, J.: Children’s rights and the developing law. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
42.
Freeman, M.D.A.: The moral status of children: essays on the rights of the child. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston (1997).
43.
Goldstein, J.: The best interests of the child: the least detrimental alternative. Free Press, New York (1996).
44.
Hale, B., Hamlyn Trust: From the test tube to the coffin: choice and regulation in private life. Stevens & Sons/Sweet & Maxwell, London (1996).
45.
Heaphy, B., Smart, C., Einarsdottir, A.: Same sex marriages: new generations, new relationships. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2013).
46.
Herring, J.: Caring and the law. Hart Publishing, Oxford (2013).
47.
Heinze, E.: Of innocence and autonomy: children, sex and human rights. Dartmouth, Aldershot, Hants, England (2000).
48.
King, M.: A better world for children?: explorations in morality and authority. Routledge, New York (1997).
49.
Lee, N.: Childhood and society: growing up in an age of uncertainty. Open University, Maidenhead (2001).
50.
Maclean, M., Eekelaar, J.: The parental obligation: a study of parenthood across households. Hart Publishing, Oxford (1997).
51.
Maclean, M., Eekelaar, J.: Family law advocacy: how barristers help the victims of family failure. Hart, Oxford (2009).
52.
Eekelaar, J., Maclean, M.: Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Hart Publishing, Oxford (2013).
53.
Maclean, M., Eekelaar, J.: Managing family justice in diverse societies. Hart Publishing, Oxford (2013).
54.
Maclean, M.: Parenting after partnering: containing conflict after separation. Hart Pub, Oxford (2007).
55.
Dempsey, M.M.: Prosecuting domestic violence: a philosophical analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009).
56.
Miles, J., Probert, R.: Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study. Hart Pub, Oxford (2009).
57.
Morgan, D.H.J.: Family connections: an introduction to family studies. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK (1996).
58.
Morgan, D.H.J.: Rethinking family practices. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2011).
59.
Mount, F.: The subversive family: an alternative history of love and marriage. Unwin, London (1982).
60.
Mullender, A., Morley, R.: Children living with domestic violence: putting men’s abuse of women on the child care agenda. Whiting & Birch, London (1994).
61.
O’Donovan, K.: Sexual divisions in law. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London (1985).
62.
O’Donovan, K.: Family law matters. Pluto Press, London (1993).
63.
Okin, S.M.: Justice, gender, and the family. Basic Books, New York (1989).
64.
Pahl, J.: Money and marriage. Macmillan Education, Basingstoke (1989).
65.
Parker, S.: Informal marriage, cohabitation and the law, 1750-1989. Macmillan, London (1990).
66.
Parton, N.: The politics of child abuse. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1985).
67.
Pateman, C.: The sexual contract. Polity, Cambridge (1988).
68.
Piper, C.: The responsible parent: a study of divorce mediation. Harvester Wheatsheaf, New York (1993).
69.
Pizzey, E., Forbes, A.: Scream quietly or the neighbours will hear. Penguin, Harmondsworth (1974).
70.
Probert, R.: Family life and the law: under one roof. Ashgate, Aldershot (2007).
71.
Probert, R.: Marriage law and practice in the long eighteenth century: a reassessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
72.
Probert, R., Barton, C., Cretney, S.M.: Fifty years in family law: essays for Stephen Cretney. Intersentia, Cambridge (2012).
73.
Probert, R.: The changing legal regulation of cohabitation: from fornicators to family, 1600-2010. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012).
74.
Reece, H.: Divorcing responsibly. Hart, Oxford (2003).
75.
Regan, M.C.: Family law and the pursuit of intimacy. New York University Press, New York (1993).
76.
Rodger, J.J.: Family life and social control: a sociological perspective. Macmillan, Basingstoke (1996).
77.
Sarat, A., Felstiner, W.L.F.: Divorce lawyers and their clients: power and meaning in the legal process. Oxford University Press, New York (1995).
78.
Shanley, M.L.: Just marriage. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004).
79.
Silva, E.B., Smart, C.: The new family? Sage, London (1999).
80.
Smart, C.: Personal life: new directions in sociological thinking. Polity, Cambridge (2007).
81.
Smart, C.: The ties that bind: law, marriage and the reproduction of patriarchal relations. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1984).
82.
Smart, C.: Feminism and the power of law. Routledge, London (1989).
83.
Smart, C., Neale, B.: Family fragments? Polity Press, Cambridge (1999).
84.
Smart, C., Neale, B., Wade, A.: The changing experience of childhood: families and divorce. Polity, Cambridge (2001).
85.
Spencer, J.R., Bois-Pedain, A. de: Freedom and responsibility in reproductive choice. Hart Publishing, Oxford (2006).
86.
Stark, E.: Coercive control: the entrapment of women in personal life. Oxford University Press, New York (2007).
87.
Wallbank, J.A., Choudhry, S., Herring, J.: Rights, gender and family law. Routledge, Abingdon (2010).
88.
Wallerstein, J.S., Kelly, J.B.: Surviving the breakup: how children and parents cope with divorce. Grant McIntyre, London (1980).
89.
Wallerstein, J.S., Blakeslee, S.: Second chances. Bantam, London (1989).
90.
Weitzman, L.J.: The divorce revolution: the unexpected social and economic consequences for women and children in America. Free Press, New York (1987).
91.
Wikeley, N.: Child support: law and policy. Hart, Oxford (2006).
92.
International journal of law, policy and the family.
93.
Family law.
94.
Child and family law quarterly.
95.
The Journal of social welfare & family law.
96.
Family law quarterly.
97.
Children’s Legal Centre (London, England): Childright. (1983).
98.
The International Journal of Children’s Rights  »  Brill Online.
99.
International Family Law.
100.
Fitzpatrick v Sterling Housing Association Ltd - [2001] 1 AC 27. (1999).
101.
Vallianatos and others v Greece (App. nos. 29381/09 and 32684/09) - [2013] ECHR 29381/09. (2013).
102.
SCHALK AND KOPF v. AUSTRIA - 30141/04 [2010] ECHR 995 (24 June 2010), http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2010/995.html.
103.
Diduck, A., Kaganas, F.: *Chapter 1. In: Family law, gender and the state. Hart, Oxford (2012).
104.
Herring, J.: *Chapter 1. In: Family law. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
105.
Harris-Short, S., Miles, J.: Chapter 1. In: Family law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
106.
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v M. (2006).
107.
Diduck, A., Kaganas, F.: *Chapter 5. In: Family law, gender and the state. Hart, Oxford (2012).
108.
Green Paper on the Family, http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/publications/green-paper-on-the-family.
109.
JDiduck, A.: A Family by any other Name ... or StarbucksTM comes to England. Journal of Law and Society. 28, 290–310 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6478.00190.
110.
Bridgeman, J., Lind, C., Keating, H.M.: Responsibility, law and the family. Ashgate, Aldershot (2008).
111.
Silva, E.B., Smart, C.: The new family? Sage, London (1999).
112.
Dewar, J.: The Normal Chaos of Family Law. Modern Law Review. 61, 467–485 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00157.
113.
Dewar, J.: Family law and its discontents. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 14, 59–85 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/14.1.59.
114.
Fineman, M.: The neutered mother, the sexual family, and other twentieth century tragedies. Routledge, New York (1995).
115.
Weeks, J.: Elective Families: lesbian and gay life experiments. In: Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. Routledge, London (2002).
116.
Carling, A.H., Duncan, S., Edwards, R.: Analysing families: morality and rationality in policy and practice. Routledge, London (2002).
117.
Diduck, A.: Shifting Familiarity. Current Legal Problems. 58, 235–254 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/58.1.235.
118.
Eekelaar, J.: Family Law and Personal Life. Oxford University Press (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199535422.001.0001.
119.
Glennon, L.: Obligations Between Adult Partners: Moving From Form to Function? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 22, 22–60 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebm017.
120.
Millbank, J.: The role of ‘functional family’ in same-sex family recognition trends. Family Law. 20, 131–283 (2008).
121.
Duncan, S., Carter, J., Phillips, M., Roseneil, S., Stoilova, M.: Legal rights for people who ‘Live Apart Together’? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 34, 443–458 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2012.753731.
122.
Farrah Ahmed and Jane Calderwood Norton*: Religious tribunals, religious freedom, and concern for vulnerable women. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 24, 363–387 (2012).
123.
Authority and Authenticity: Sharia Councils, Muslim Women’s Rights and the English courts. Child and family law quarterly. 25, 119–136 (2013).
124.
Family justice review: final report, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/family-justice-review-final-report--2, (2011).
125.
Government response to the family justice review, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/government-response-to-the-family-justice-review-a-system-with-children-and-families-at-its-heart, (2012).
126.
Long, R.: Family Justice Review update: Contact and other issues for parents following separation - Commons Library Standard Note, http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/briefing-papers/SN06335/family-justice-review-update-contact-and-other-issues-for-parents-following-separation, (2012).
127.
Justice Ryder: Judicial Proposals for the Modernisation of Family Justice, https://www.judiciary.gov.uk/publications/family-modernisation-final-report/, (2012).
128.
A brighter future for Family Justice, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/whats-happened-since-the-family-justice-review-a-brighter-future-for-family-justice, (2014).
129.
George, R.H.: *Ideas and debates in family law. Hart, Oxford (2012).
130.
Eekelaar, John: Evaluating Legal Regulation of Family Behaviour. International Journal of the Jurisprudence of the Family. 1, (2010).
131.
Eekelaar, J.: "Not of the Highest Importance”: Family justice under threat. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 33, 311–317 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2011.632883.
132.
A Diduck: Autonomy and Vulnerability in family law: the missing link. In: Wallbank, J.A. and Herring, J. (eds.) Vulnerabilities, care and family law. Routledge, Abingdon, Oxon (2014).
133.
Eekelaar, J., Maclean, M.: Family justice: the work of family judges in uncertain times. Hart Publishing, Oxford (2013).
134.
Cobb, S.: Legal aid reform: its impact on family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 35, 3–19 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2013.774607.
135.
Family Law Online special issue May 2014.
136.
Q v Q [2014] EWFC 31, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5CVC-5321-F0JY-C2TR&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2014).
137.
Diduck, A., Kaganas, F.: Chapter 2. In: Family law, gender and the state. Hart, Oxford (2012).
138.
Herring, J.: Chapter 2. In: Family law. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
139.
Harris-Short, S., Miles, J.: Chapter 2. In: Family law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
140.
George, R.H.: Ideas and debates in family law. Hart, Oxford (2012).
141.
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61R0-TWPY-Y1H9&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (1973).
142.
Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=58YH-KVW1-DYCN-C1YY&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2013).
143.
Hudson v Leigh [2009] EWHC 1306, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?oc=00240&elb=t&lni=7VYJ-BVP0-YBF6-71X9&perma=true&csi=316762&secondRedirectIndicator=true, (2009).
144.
Leigh v Hudson [2009] EWCA Civ 1442, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?oc=00240&elb=t&lni=7XK5-RG80-YBF6-73KP&perma=true&csi=316762&secondRedirectIndicator=true, (2009).
145.
MA v JA [2012] EWHC 2219 (Fam), http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5676-WV21-F0JY-C46B&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2012).
146.
Bevan, C.: The role of intention in non-marriage cases post Hudson v Leigh. Child and family law quarterly. 25, (2013).
147.
Probert, Rebecca: The Evolving Concept of Non-Marriage. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 314–351 (2013).
148.
Gender Recognition Act 2004, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61F0-TWPY-Y18X&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2004).
149.
Sheffield City Council v E & Anor [2004] EWHC 2808 (Fam) (02 December 2004), http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2004/2808.html.
150.
Wilkinson v Kitzinger and others [2006] EWHC 2022 (Fam), http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VG31-DYBP-P0N7&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2006).
151.
Harding, R.: ‘Wilkinson v Kitzinger’ (An alternative Judgment). In: Feminist judgments: from theory to practice. pp. 425–430. Hart, Oxford (2010).
152.
Equal marriage consultation - Consultations - GOV.UK, https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/equal-marriage-consultation, (2012).
153.
R (on the application of Quila and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (on the application of Bibi and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 45, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=540Y-JNJ1-F0JY-C4JF&csi=316762&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2011).
154.
Every Family Matters: An in-depth review of family law in Britain, http://www.centreforsocialjustice.org.uk/publications/every-family-matters, (2009).
155.
R (on the application of Baiai and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (on the application of Trzcinska and others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VGC1-DYBP-P4KY&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2008).
156.
P v R (Forced Marriage: Annulment) [2003] 1 FLR 661, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20031FLR0661, (2002).
157.
B v I [2010] 1 FLR 1721 (forced marriage as non-marriage), http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20101FLR1721.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20101FLR1721, (2010).
158.
NS v MI [2006] EWHC 1646 (Fam), [2007] 2 FCR 748, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4R46-GW00-TWP1-D108&csi=274607&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2006).
159.
Goodwin v United Kingdom (Application 28957/95) [2002] IRLR 664, [2002] 2 FCR 577, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4R47-6YT0-TWP1-D0YN&csi=274607&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2002).
160.
Schafer, L: Marrying an in-law? The future of prohibited degrees of affinity and consanguinity in English Law. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 20, 219–229 (2008).
161.
Lewis, Jane: Marriage and Cohabitation and the Nature of Commitment. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 11, (1999).
162.
Diduck, A.: Chapter 2. In: Law’s families. LexisNexis, London (2003).
163.
Probert, R.: Marriage law and practice in the long eighteenth century: a reassessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009).
164.
Norrie, Kenneth McK: Marriage is for Heterosexuals - May the Rest of Us Be Saved From It. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 12, (2000).
165.
Marriage Act 1949, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-G0K0-TWPY-Y0ND&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (1949).
166.
Anitha, S., Gill, A.: Coercion, Consent and the Forced Marriage Debate in the UK. Feminist Legal Studies. 17, 165–184 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-009-9119-4.
167.
A choice by right : the report of the working group on forced marriage. Home Office Communications Directorate, [London] (2000).
168.
Bellinger v Bellinger (Lord Chancellor intervening) - [2003] 2 AC 467, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WN0-TXD8-60S7&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2003).
169.
CORBETT v. CORBETT (OTHERWISE ASHLEY) - [1971] P. 83, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPY0-TXD6-F09Y&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (1970).
170.
Corbett v Corbett (otherwise Ashley) - [1970] 2 All ER 33, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-35T0-TWP1-60SD&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (1970).
171.
THE REES CASE [1987] 2 FLR 111, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19872FLR0111, (1986).
172.
Cossey v Cossey [1991] 2 FLR 492, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19912FLR0492, (1991).
173.
SHEFFIELD AND HORSHAM v UK [1998] 2 FLR 928, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19982FLR0928, (1998).
174.
W v W (Nullity: Gender) [2001] 1 FLR 324, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0324, (2001).
175.
Gereis v Yagoub [1997] 1 FLR 854, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19971FLR0854, (1997).
176.
Chief Adjudication Officer v Bath [2000] 1 FLR 8, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0008, (2000).
177.
B and L v UK [2006] 1 FLR 35, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20061FLR0035, (2006).
178.
The Marriage Act 1949 (Remedial) Order 2007 No. 438, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4SW7-STT0-TX08-H19V&csi=283307&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2007).
179.
Singh v Singh [1971] P 226, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPY0-TXD6-F0FK&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (1971).
180.
Hirani v Hirani [1983] 4 FLR 232, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19834FLR0232, (1982).
181.
Vervaeke v Smith (Messina and A-G intervening) [1983] 1 AC 145, [1982] 2 All ER 144, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JT8-8WP0-TXD8-60P2&csi=296986&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (1983).
182.
Hyde v Hyde and Woodmansee - [1861-73] All ER Rep 175, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4FPP-FDH0-TWXJ-213C&csi=279846&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (1866).
183.
Gandhi v Patel et al [2002] 1 FLR 603, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20021FLR0603, (2011).
184.
BALFOUR v. BALFOUR. - [1919] 2 K.B. 571, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4K4F-RWJ0-TXD5-X0ST&csi=296982&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (1919).
185.
Eekelaar, J.: Marriage: a modest proposal. Family Law. 83, (2013).
186.
Halpern et al. v. Attorney General of Canada et al. (June 10, 2003), http://www.ontariocourts.on.ca/decisions/2003/june/halpernC39172.htm, (2003).
187.
Minister of Home Affairs and another v Fourie and another; Lesbian and Gay Equality Project and others v Minister of Home Affairs and others - (2005) 20 BHRC 368. (2005).
188.
Home Affairs v Fourie [2005] ZACC 19, http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2005/19.html, (2005).
189.
United States v Windsor 570 US 2013, http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/slipopinion/12, (2012).
190.
Auchmuty, R.: What’s so special about marriage? The Impact of Wilkinson v Kitzinger. Child and family law quarterly. 20, (2008).
191.
Tatchell, P.: Why our new same-sex marriage is not yet equal marriage. New statesman. (2013).
192.
Civil Partnership Act 2004, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-FBY0-TWPY-Y055&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2004).
193.
Equality Act 2010 section 202, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7Y7R-3430-Y97X-73G2&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2010).
194.
*Vallianatos v Greece (Application nos 29381/09 and 32684/09), http://hudoc.echr.coe.int/sites/eng/pages/search.aspx?i=001-128294#{%22itemid%22:[%22001-128294%22]}, (2013).
195.
Bamforth, N.: The benefits of marriage in all but name? Same sex couples and the Civil Partnership Act 2004. Child and family law quarterly. 19, (2007).
196.
Stychin, C.: *Family Friendly?: Rights, Responsibilities and Relationship Recognition. In: Feminist perspectives on family law. Routledge-Cavendish, Abingdon (2006).
197.
Crompton, L.: The Civil Partnerships Bill 2004: The Illusion of Equality. Family law. 34, (2004).
198.
Hale, B.: Homosexual Rights. Child and family law quarterly. 16, (2004).
199.
Civil Partnership: A Framework for the legal recognition of same-sex couples, https://web.archive.org/web/20030801141524/http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/research/index.htm#civilpartnerships, (2003).
200.
*Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown (Overview), http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm, (2006).
201.
*Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown, http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm, (2007).
202.
Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=59MP-VFS1-DYBP-P11K&csi=274662&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2004).
203.
Barlow, A., James, G.: *Regulating Marriage and Cohabitation in 21st Century Britain. Modern Law Review. 67, 143–176 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2004.00482.x.
204.
CM v STS [2008] CSOH 125 (2 September 2008), http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/opinions/2008CSOH125.html, (2008).
205.
Miles, J., Wasoff, F., Mordaunt, E.: Reforming family law – the case of cohabitation: ‘things may not work out as you expect’. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 34, 167–177 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2012.718532.
206.
Douglas, G., Pearce, J., Woodward, H.: Cohabitants, Property and the Law: A Study of Injustice. Modern Law Review. 72, 24–47 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00732.x.
207.
Barlow, A.: Cohabitation, marriage and the law: social change and legal reform in the 21st century. Hart, Oxford (2005).
208.
Deech, R.: Cohabitant. Family law. 40, (2010).
209.
Lewis, Jane: Marriage and Cohabitation and the Nature of Commitment. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 11, (1999).
210.
Parker, S.: Informal marriage, cohabitation and the law, 1750-1989. Macmillan, London (1990).
211.
Re J (Income Support: Cohabitation) [1995] 1 FLR 660, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19951FLR0660, (1995).
212.
Freeman, M.D.A., Lyon, C.M.: Cohabitation without marriage: an essay in law and social policy. Gower, Aldershot (1983).
213.
Deech, R.: The Case Against the Legal Recognition of Cohabitation. In: Marriage and cohabitation in contemporary societies: areas of legal, social and ethical change. Butterworths, Toronto (1980).
214.
Diduck, A., Kaganas, F.: Chapter 12. In: Family law, gender and the state. Hart, Oxford (2012).
215.
Herring, J.: Chapter 6. In: Family law. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
216.
Harris-Short, S., Miles, J.: Chapter 4. In: Family law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
217.
New government domestic violence and abuse definition, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/new-government-domestic-violence-and-abuse-definition.
218.
Family Law Act 1996 Part IV, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61P0-TWPY-Y1F8&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
219.
Protection from Harassment Act 1997, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-HC70-TWPY-Y0CJ&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (1997).
220.
Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-61F0-TWPY-Y0BK&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2004).
221.
Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4ST8-HC60-TWPY-Y0KY&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2007).
222.
Crime and Security Act 2010, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=7Y7B-PJM0-Y97X-74GB&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2010).
223.
Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5BS9-MNJ1-DYCN-C2CP&csi=274768&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (2014).
224.
B v B (Occupation Order) [1999] 1 FLR 715, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715, (1998).
225.
Chalmers v Johns [1999] 1 FLR 392, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0715#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19991FLR0392.
226.
Mark John Smith v R [2012] EWCA Crim 2566, http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2012/2566.html, (2012).
227.
Burris v Azadani - [1995] 4 All ER 802, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4CSP-4J80-TWP1-60YF&csi=274668&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (1995).
228.
House of Lords: R v Ireland, R v Burstow [1997] 3 WLR 534. (1997).
229.
R v Hills [2001] 1 FLR 580, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580, (2000).
230.
Lau v Director of Public Prosecutions [2000] 1 FLR 799, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20011FLR0580#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_20001FLR0799, (2000).
231.
R v Colohan [2001] EWCA Crim 1251, http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Crim/2001/1251.html, (2001).
232.
Harris, J.: An Evaluation of the Use and Effectiveness of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/hors2000.html, (2000).
233.
Bowcott, O.: Stalking prosecutions rise by 20% under new law on harassment | Law | The Guardian. The guardian. (2014).
234.
C v C [1998] Fam 70, http://www.lexisnexis.com/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=4JNM-XPX0-TXD6-F1C5&csi=296981&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t, (1998).
235.
Chechi v Bashier [1999] 2 FLR 489, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0489.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0489, (1999).
236.
G v F (Non-Molestation Order : Jurisdiction), [2000] 2 FLR 533, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20002FLR0533.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_20002FLR0533, (2000).
237.
P v P (Contempt of Court: Mental Capacity) [1999] 2 FLR 897, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/web/pub.xql?action=home&pub=FAMILYpa&lang=en&23;addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0897.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19992FLR0897, (1999).
238.
Banks v Banks [1999] 1 FLR 726, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2Gdn5Ctm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1999).
239.
H v O (Contempt of Court: Sentencing) [2004] EWCA Civ 1691, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGtm2KJn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2004).
240.
Burton, M.: Civil law remedies for domestic violence: why are applications for non-molestation orders declining? Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 31, 109–120 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1080/09649060903043497.
241.
Dolan v Corby  [2011] EWCA (Civ) 1664, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GtmYmJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2011).
242.
Richards v Richards  (1983)  2  All  ER  807, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1983).
243.
Kaganas, Felicity: B v B (Occupation Order) and Chalmers v Johns Occupation Orders under the Family Law Act 1996. Child and Family Law Quarterly. 11, (1999).
244.
G v G (Occupation Order: Conduct) [2000] 2 FLR 36, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGZnZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2000).
245.
Murray v Robinson [2006] 1FLR 365, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2mZn0qtmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (2006).
246.
Kazimirski et al., A.: Forced marriage: prevalence and service response, http://www.natcen.ac.uk/our-research/research/forced-marriage/, (2009).
247.
Pearce, N., Gill, A.: Criminalising Forced Marriage Through Stand alone Legislation: Will it Work? Family law. 42, 534–542 (2012).
248.
*Yemshaw v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 3, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3mZm1GJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2011).
249.
Choudhry, S., Herring, J.: Chapter 9. In: European human rights and family law. Hart, Oxford (2010).
250.
Chief Constable of the Hertfordshire Police v Van Colle [2008] UKHL 50, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZnYetnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2008).
251.
Burton, M.: Failing to Protect: Victims’ Rights and Police Liability. Modern Law Review. 72, 283–295 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00744.x.
252.
Platt, J.: The Domestic Violence, Crime and Victims Act 2004 Part 1: Is it Working? Family law. 38, (2008).
253.
Dobash, R.P.: Women’s Violence to Men in Intimate Relationships: Working on a Puzzle. British Journal of Criminology. 44, 324–349 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azh026.
254.
Finney, A.: Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the 2004/5 British Crime Survey Summary, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/onlinepubs1.html, (2006).
255.
Call to end violence against women and girls, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/call-to-end-violence-against-women-and-girls, (2010).
256.
Hester, M.: Who does what to whom? Gender and domestic violence perpetrators in English police records. European Journal of Criminology. 10, 623–637 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370813479078.
257.
Walby, S., Allen, J.: Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault and Stalking: Findings from the British Crime Survey, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/hors2004.html, (2004).
258.
Hale v Tanner [2000] 2 FLR 879, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2000).
259.
Nwogbe v Nwogbe [2000] 2 FLR 744, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKJm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2000).
260.
Humphreys, C., Thiara, R.K.: Neither justice nor protection: women’s experiences of post‐separation violence. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 25, 195–214 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/0964906032000145948.
261.
Paradine, K., Wilkinson, J.: A research and literature review. Protection and accountability: the reporting, investigation and prosecution of domestic violence cases. National Centre for Policing Excellence, [England (2004).
262.
Dobash, R.E., Dobash, R.P.: The Politics and Policies of Responding to Violence Against Women. In: Home truths about domestic violence: feminist influences on policy and practice : a reader. Routledge, London (2000).
263.
Law’s Progressive Potential: The Value of Engagement with the Law for Domestic Violence. Social & Legal Studies. 10, 105–130 (2001).
264.
Great Britain: The Law Commission (Law Com. No. 207). Family law: domestic violence and occupation of the family home. House of Commons?], [London (1992).
265.
Freeman, M.: Legal Ideologies; patriarchal precedents and domestic violence. In: The State, the law, and the family. Tavistock, London (1984).
266.
Hayes, M.: Non-Molestation Protection: Only Associated Persons Need Apply. Family law. 26, (1996).
267.
Itzin, C.: Gendering Domestic Violence: The Influence of Feminsim on Policy and Practice. In: Home truths about domestic violence: feminist influences on policy and practice : a reader. Routledge, London (2000).
268.
Strengthening the law on domestic abuse - Consultations - Summary of responses, https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/strengthening-the-law-on-domestic-abuse, (2014).
269.
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 ss 1 – 10A, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmJmZKJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1973).
270.
Civil Partnership Act 2004 ss 44 - 48, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidn3KJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2004).
271.
Diduck, A., Kaganas, F.: Chapter 3. In: Family law, gender and the state. Hart, Oxford (2012).
272.
Herring, J.: Chapter 3. In: Family law. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
273.
Harris-Short, S., Miles, J.: Chapter 5. In: Family law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
274.
Pheasant v Pheasant [1972] 1 All ER 587, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1972).
275.
Buffery v Buffery [1988] 2 FLR 365, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1987).
276.
Cleary v Cleary [1974] 1 All ER 498, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm2CJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1974).
277.
Carr v Carr [1974] 1 All ER 1193, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm4GdnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1974).
278.
Ash v Ash [1972] 1 All ER 582, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qdmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1972).
279.
Pheasant v Pheasant [1972] 1 All ER 587, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1972).
280.
Thurlow v Thurlow [1975] 2 All ER 979, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmXqZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1975).
281.
Bradley v Bradley [1973] 3 All ER 750, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udnYCdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1973).
282.
Buffery v Buffery [1988] 2 FLR 365, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qtnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1987).
283.
Livingstone-Stollard v Livingstone-Stollard [1974] Fam 47, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm1qdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1974).
284.
Butterworth v Butterworth [1997] 2 FLR 336, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtm4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1997).
285.
Birch v Birch [1992] 1 FLR 564, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1992).
286.
Perry v Perry [1963] 3 All ER 766, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udo0mZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1963).
287.
Glenister v Glenister [1945] P 30, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CdnXCZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha/glenister-v-glenister, (1945).
288.
Dunn v Dunn [1967] P 217, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZn5uJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1967).
289.
Stringfellow v Stringfellow [1976] 2 All ER 539, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmWiZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1976).
290.
Pardy v Pardy [1939] P 288, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2Ctn2CZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1939).
291.
Slawson v Slawson [1942] 2 All ER 527, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGdn3iZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1942).
292.
Santos v Santos [1972] 2 All ER 246, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0GdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1972).
293.
Mouncer v Mouncer [ 1972] 1 All ER 289, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn1CJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1972).
294.
Parker v Parker [1972] 1 All ER 410, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2udn0iZnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1972).
295.
Rukat v Rukat [1975] 1 All ER 343, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZmYatmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1974).
296.
Grenfell v Grenfell [1978] Fam 128, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uJm1eJmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1977).
297.
Archer v Archer [ 1999] 1 FLR 327, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYydmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1998).
298.
K v K (Financial relief: Widow’s Pension) [1997] 1 FLR 35, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidm4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1997).
299.
Wickler v Wickler [1998] 2 FLR 326, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1998).
300.
Douglas et al., G.: The Role of Religious Tribunals in Regulating Marriage and Divorce. Child and family law quarterly. 24, 139–157 (2012).
301.
Douglas et al, G.: Accommodating Religious Divorce in the Secular State: A Case-Study Analysis. In: Families: Deviance, Diversity and the Law. pp. 185–201. Hart Publishing (2013).
302.
Sandberg, R., Douglas, G., Doe, N., Gilliat-Ray, S., Khan, A.: Britain’s Religious Tribunals: ‘Joint Governance’ in Practice. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 33, 263–291 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqs031.
303.
Diduck, A.: *Chapter 3. In: Law’s families. LexisNexis, London (2003).
304.
Reece, H.: Divorcing responsibly. Hart, Oxford (2003).
305.
Looking to the future: mediation and the ground for divorce the Government’s proposals - Publications - GOV.UK, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/looking-to-the-future-mediation-and-the-ground-for-divorce-the-governments-proposals, (1995).
306.
Family Law Act 1996, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYiZnXqdm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1996).
307.
Supporting Families: A consultation document, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ERORecords/HO/421/2/P2/ACU/SUPPFAM.HTM, (1998).
308.
Eekelaar, J.: Family Justice: Ideal or Illusion?: Family Law and Communitarian Values. Current Legal Problems. 48, 191–216 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/48.Part_2.191.
309.
Cretney, S.: Divorce Reform in England: Humbug and Hypocrisy or a Smooth Transition? In: Divorce: where next? Dartmouth Pub. Co, Aldershot, Hants (1996).
310.
Deech, R.: *Divorce – A Disaster? Family law. 39, (2009).
311.
Smart, C., Neale, B.: *Good enough morality? Divorce and postmodernity. Critical Social Policy. 17, 3–27 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1177/026101839701705301.
312.
Dewar, J.: *The Normal Chaos of Family Law. Modern Law Review. 61, 467–485 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00157.
313.
Sclater, S.D., Piper, C.: *The Family Law Act 1996 in Context. In: Undercurrents of divorce. Ashgate, Aldershot, England (1999).
314.
Douglas et al., G.: Supporting Children when Parents Separate - A Neglected Family Justice or Mental Health Issue? Child and family law quarterly. 8, (1996).
315.
Sclater, S.D.: *Narratives of divorce. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 19, 423–441 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069708410209.
316.
Sclater, S.D.: Divorce: a psychosocial study. Ashgate, Aldershot, Hants, England (1999).
317.
Sclater, S.D., Brown, J.: Divorce: A Psychodynamic Perspective. In: Undercurrents of divorce. Ashgate, Aldershot, England (1999).
318.
Sclater, S.D.: Experiences of Divorce. In: Undercurrents of divorce. Ashgate, Aldershot, England (1999).
319.
Collier, R.: The Dashing of a ‘Liberal Dream’? - The Information Meeting, The ‘New Family’ and the Limits of Law. Child and family law quarterly. 11, (1999).
320.
Eekelaar, J.: *Family Law: Keeping us ‘On Message’. Child and family law quarterly. 11, (1999).
321.
Sclater, S.D., Piper, C.: *Re-moralising the Family? – Family Policy, Family Law and Youth Justice. Child and family law quarterly. 12, (2000).
322.
Reece, H.: *Divorcing Responsibly. Feminist Legal Studies. 8, 65–91 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009283815775.
323.
Reece, H.: Divorcing the Children. In: Feminist perspectives on child law. Cavendish, London (2000).
324.
Eekelaar, J., Beinart, S., Maclean, M.: Family lawyers: the divorce work of solicitors. Hart, Oxford (2000).
325.
Walker et al., J.: Picking up the Pieces: Marriage and Divorce: Two years after Information Provision, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dca.gov.uk/pubs/reports/family2004-webpageintro.htm, (2004).
326.
Responses to Civil Partnership: A framework for the legal recognition of same-sex couples, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20040105034450/http://www.womenandequalityunit.gov.uk/research/index.htm#cp_responses, (2003).
327.
Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmJmZKJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1973).
328.
Civil Partnership Act 2004, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYidn3KJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2004).
329.
Diduck, A., Kaganas, F.: Chapter 7. In: Family law, gender and the state. Hart, Oxford (2012).
330.
Herring, J.: Chapter 5. In: Family law. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
331.
Harris-Short, S., Miles, J.: Chapter 7. In: Family law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
332.
White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white, (2000).
333.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break, (2006).
334.
Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdnYuto2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2007).
335.
Matrimonial Property, Needs and Agreements - Law Commission, http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/publications/matrimonial-property.htm, (2014).
336.
Suter v Suter [1987] 2 FLR 232, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1986).
337.
Re A [1998] 1 FLR 347, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1998).
338.
*B v B (Financial Provision Welfare of Child and Conduct) [2002] 1 FLR 555, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2002).
339.
Prest v Petrodel Resources and others [2013] UKSC 34, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5yJn5itm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2013).
340.
George, R.: Family finances and the corporate veil: Prest v Petrodel. Family Law. 43, (2013).
341.
Sharland v Sharland [2014] EWCA 95, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5GJm5adn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2014).
342.
Delaney v Delaney [1990] 2 FLR 457, http://onlineservices.jordanpublishing.co.uk/content/en/FAMILYpa/Family_FLJONLINE_FLJ_navParentTopic_0#addHistory=true&filename=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457.dita.xml&docid=Family_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457&inner_id=&tid=&query=&scope=&resource=&toc=false&eventType=lcContent.loadDocFamily_FLRONLINE_FLR_19902FLR0457, (1990).
343.
Leadbeater v Leadbeater [1985] FLR 789, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo1mJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1985).
344.
P v P (Divorce: Financial Provision Clean Break) [2002] EWCA Civ 1886; [2003] 1 FLR 942, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZiJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/parra-v-parra, (2002).
345.
N v F [2011] EWHC 586 (pre-acquired wealth), http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3udoWqJm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2011).
346.
*Jones v Jones [2011] EWCA Civ 41, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3mZm3ytmYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/jones-v-jones, (2011).
347.
Y v Y (financial orders inherited wealth) [2012] EWHC Fam 2063, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uJn3mdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2012).
348.
SK v WL (post separation accrual] [2011] 1 FLR 1471, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3uZm1qJmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2011).
349.
*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break, (2006).
350.
*Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdnYuto2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2007).
351.
Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3itm3GtoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/robson-v-robson, (2010).
352.
K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3eJn2udo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2011).
353.
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2008).
354.
North v North [2007] EWCA Civ 760, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZaJm1Kto1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2007).
355.
Dart v Dart [1996] 2 FLR 286, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYetn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1996).
356.
P v P (Inherited property) [2004] EWHC 1364; [2005] 1 FLR 576, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm3yZm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2004).
357.
Grey v Grey [2009] EWCA Civ 1424, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3aJm3Ctn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2009).
358.
SA v PA [2014] EWCA 392, http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXatmZuZmXqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa, (2014).
359.
H v H [2014] EWHC 760, http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXadm3uJmWedlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa, (2014).
360.
White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white, (2000).
361.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break, (2006).
362.
Preston v Preston (1982) Fam 17, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXiZmSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1982).
363.
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2008).
364.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break, (2006).
365.
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2008).
366.
White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white, (2000).
367.
*C v C (Financial Relief: Short Marriage) [1997] 2 FLR 26, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYitoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1997).
368.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break, (2006).
369.
*White v White [2001] 1 AC 596, [2000] 2 FLR 981, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudmWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/white-v-white, (2000).
370.
*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break, (2006).
371.
B v B (Mesher Order) [2002] EWHC 3106 (Fam); [2003] 2 FLR 285, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm1eZn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2002).
372.
*Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break, (2006).
373.
Wachtel v Wachtel [1973] Fam 72, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2uZm5GJnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1973).
374.
K v L [2010] EWCA Civ 125 (Child sexual abuse), http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qdn3CdoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2010).
375.
Vaughn v Vaughn (financial misconduct) [2007] EWCA Civ 1085, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZado0adn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2007).
376.
K v K [1990] 2 FLR 225, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXeZm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1990).
377.
Clark v Clark [1999] 2 FLR 498, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCJm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1999).
378.
Kokosinski v Kokosinski [1980] 1 All ER 1106, http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo0edlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa, (1980).
379.
H v H (Financial Relief: Attempted Murder as Conduct) [2006] 1 FLR 990, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCZm5mtnWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2006).
380.
T v T (Financial relief: Pensions) [1998] 1 FLR 1072, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYqZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1998).
381.
C v C (Financial Relief: Short Marriage) [1997] 2 FLR 26, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYitoYWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1997).
382.
Suter v Suter [1987] 2 All ER 336, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3KdoSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha, (1987).
383.
Mawson v Mawson [1994] 2 FLR 985, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXCto1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1994).
384.
K v K (Ancillary Relief: Prenuptial Agreement) [2003] 1 FLR 120, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZitm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2003).
385.
K v K (Periodical Payment: Cohabitation) [2006] 2 FLR 468, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn2iZm1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2006).
386.
Miller v Miller; McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZuJn4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/miller-v-miller-short-marriage-clean-break, (2006).
387.
Martin v Martin [1978] Fam 12, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYGJn4Gto4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1977).
388.
Clutton v Clutton [1991] 1 All ER 340, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXetoZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1991).
389.
Mesher v Mesher and Hall [1980] 1 All ER 126, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCZn1adoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1980).
390.
Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uZmWGZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/piglowski-v-piglowski, (1999).
391.
B v B (Mesher Order) [2002] EWHC 3106 (Fam); [2003] 2 FLR 285, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm1eZn0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2002).
392.
Richardson v Richardson [1978] 9 Fam Law 86, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZidm4Ctn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1978).
393.
T v T (Financial relief: Pensions) [1998] 1 FLR 1072, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYqZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1998).
394.
S v S [2002] 1 FLR 457, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZedm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/s-v-s-rescission-of-decree-nisi-pension-sharing-provision, (2002).
395.
Do Divorced Women Catch Up in Pension Building? Child and family law quarterly. 14, (2002).
396.
PRICE, D.: Closing the Gender Gap in Retirement Income: What Difference Will Recent UK Pension Reforms Make? Journal of Social Policy. 36, (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279407001183.
397.
Price, D.: Pension Accumulation and Gendered Household Structures. In: Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study. Hart Pub, Oxford (2009).
398.
Xydias v Xydias [1999] 1 FLR 683 – general policy, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYyZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1999).
399.
Soulsbury v Soulsbury [2007] EWCA Civ 969, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXytm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2007).
400.
Edgar v Edgar [1980] 1 WLR 1410, http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa, (1980).
401.
MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido0mJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/macleod-v-macleod, (2009).
402.
Crossley v Crossley [2007] EWCA Civ 1491, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetn5Cto4WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2007).
403.
*Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA 649, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZn4adn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2010).
404.
Z v Z (No 2) [2011] EWHC 2878, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo5qdn2udm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2011).
405.
B v S [2012] EWHC 265, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4aJnXKZn3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2012).
406.
V v V [2011] EWHC 3230, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GZmYKdo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2011).
407.
SA v PA (pre-marital agreement) [2014] EWCA 392, http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXatmZuZmXqdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa, (2014).
408.
Pavlou, P.: Pre-Nuptial Agreements – Back Where we Were? Kremen v Agrest. Family law. 42, (2012).
409.
Stack v Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, http://www.justcite.com/Document/f7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2mZn0itnSiIs1jxAZrwAJrxAV5wsKjIoW0ha/stack-v-dowden, (2007).
410.
Jones v Kernott  [2011] UKSC 53, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2GdnZuto0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2011).
411.
Consultation Paper No 179: Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown (Overview), http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/areas/cohabitation.htm, (2006).
412.
Supplementary Consultation Paper Matrimonial Property,Needs and Agreements, http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/consultations/matrimonial_property.htm, (2012).
413.
*V v V [2011] EWHC 3230, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3GZmYKdo2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2011).
414.
McFarlane v McFarlane (no 2) [2009] EWHC 891, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CdoXGJnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2009).
415.
GW v RW (Financial provision: Departure From Equality) [2003] 2 FLR 108, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCto3CdoZWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2003).
416.
MacLeod v MacLeod [2008] UKPC 64, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido0mJm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/macleod-v-macleod, (2009).
417.
Radmacher v Granatino [2009] EWCA 649, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZn4adn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2010).
418.
H v H [2007] EWHC 459 (Fam), http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYKtn4ytn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2007).
419.
S v S [2007] EWHC 1975 (Fam), http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYCJnXeJn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2007).
420.
B v B [2008] EWCA Civ 543, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXmZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/b-v-b-ancillary-relief-distribution-of-assets, (2008).
421.
VB v JP [ 2008] EWHC 112, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZeJn1qdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2008).
422.
Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 1 WLR 1360, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo4uZmWGZnXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF/piglowski-v-piglowski, (1999).
423.
McCartney v Mills-McCartney [2008] EWHC 401; [2008] 1 FCR 707, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZetoXydm5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2008).
424.
Myerson v. Myerson (2009) 1 FLR 826, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido1iZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2009).
425.
Miles, J.: *Charman v Charman: making sense of need, compensation and equal sharing after Miller/McFarlane. Child and family law quarterly. 20, (2008).
426.
Diduck, A.: *Ancillary Relief: Complicating the Search for Principle. Journal of Law and Society. 38, 272–300 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2011.00543.x.
427.
Leech, S., Young, R.: Marriage, divorce and ancillary relief under the Human Rights Act 1998: an introduction. In: European human rights law review. pp. 300–311 (2001).
428.
Douglas, G., Perry, A.: How parents cope financially on separation and divorce- implications for the future of ancillary relief. Child and family law quarterly. 13, (2001).
429.
Eekelaar, J.: Back to Basics and Forward into the Unknown. Family law. 31, (2001).
430.
Diduck, A.: Fairness and Justice for All? The House of Lords in White v. White [2000] 2 F.L.R. 981. Feminist Legal Studies. 9, 173–183 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016744705288.
431.
Diduck, A.: Chapter 6. In: Law’s families. LexisNexis, London (2003).
432.
Cretney, S.: The Family and the Law – Status or Contract? Child and family law quarterly. 15, (2003).
433.
Edwards, S.: Division of Assets and Fairness - `Brick Lane’ – Gender, Culture and Ancillary Relief on Divorce. Family law. 34, (2004).
434.
Eekelaar, J.: Asset distribution on divorce - the durational element. Law quarterly review. 117, (2001).
435.
Eekelaar, J.: Asset Distribution on Divorce – Time and Property. Family law. 33, (2003).
436.
Herring, J.: Why Financial Orders on Divorce should be Unfair. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 19, 218–228 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebi016.
437.
Symes, P.: INDISSOLUBILITY AND THE CLEAN BREAK. The Modern Law Review. 48, 44–60 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1985.tb00825.x.
438.
John Eekelaar: Equality and the Purpose of Maintenance. Journal of Law and Society. 15, 188–200 (1988).
439.
Diduck, A., Orton, H.: Equality and Support for Spouses. The Modern Law Review. 57, 681–702 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1994.tb01969.x.
440.
Diduck, A.: *What is Family Law For? Current Legal Problems. 64, 287–314 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cur010.
441.
Hale, B.: *Equality and autonomy in family law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 33, 3–14 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2011.571466.
442.
Thorpe, M.: London- The Divorce Capital of the World. Family law. 39, (2009).
443.
Deech, R.: What’s a Woman Worth? Family law. 39, (2009).
444.
Ferguson, L.: *Family, Social Inequalities, and the Persuasive Force of Interpersonal Obligation. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 22, 61–90 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebm015.
445.
Glennon, L.: *The limitations of equality discourses on the contours of intimate relations. In: Rights, gender and family law. Routledge, Abingdon (2010).
446.
Hitchings, E.: *Chaos or Consistency? Ancillary Relief in the ‘Everyday’ Case. In: Sharing lives, dividing assets: an inter-disciplinary study. Hart Pub, Oxford (2009).
447.
Ouazzani, S.: Prenuptial agreements: the implications of gender. Family law. 43, (2013).
448.
Herring, J.: Chapter 5. In: Family law. Pearson, Harlow (2013).
449.
Diduck, A., Kaganas, F.: Chapter 7. In: Family law, gender and the state. Hart, Oxford (2012).
450.
Harris-Short, S., Miles, J.: Chapter 6. In: Family law: text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011).
451.
Supporting Separated Families, Securing Children’s Futures: A Public Consultation Document, https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/supporting-separated-families-securing-children-s-futures, (2012).
452.
Government response to the consultation: Supporting separated families: securing children’s futures, https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/supporting-separated-families-securing-children-s-futures, (2013).
453.
Douglas et al., G.: Contact is not a Commodity to be Bartered for Money. Family law. 41, (2011).
454.
R. (on the application of Kehoe) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2005] UKHL 48; [2004] EWCA Civ 225; [2004] 1 FLR 1132 (on enforcement)., http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZmtm0WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2005).
455.
R (Rowley and others) v Sec State for Work and Pensions [ 2007] EWCA Civ 598, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZatn5yto3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2007).
456.
T v B [2010] EWHC 1444 (Fam), http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo3idmZitn2WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2010).
457.
Re A (child of the Family) [1998] 1 FLR 347, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYmtoWWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1998).
458.
Re C (A Minor) (child Support Agency: Disclosure) [1995] 1 FLR 201, http://www.justcite.com/Document/e7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXmJn0CdlIOuDYL2CKL2y0L2BULezIOdm9baa, (1995).
459.
Re E (A Minor) (child Support: Blood Test) [1994] 2 FLR 548, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoXCdn5WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1994).
460.
J v C (Child: Financial Provision) [1999] 1 FLR 152, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoYudo1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (1999).
461.
Re P (A Child) (Financial provision) [2003] 2 FLR 865, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo1uZm3WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2003).
462.
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Jones [2004] 1 FLR. 282, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2CZm4Ktn1WIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2003).
463.
Treharne v. Sec of State for W&P [2009] 1 FLR 853, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIoZido5mZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2008).
464.
Brookes v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 420, http://www.justcite.com/Document/d7jsrUrxA0LxsKjIo2KZn1iZmXWIikvNCPnhzPngDP9MBjrMi6atF, (2010).
465.
Bryson, C., Ellman, I.M., McKay, S., Miles, J.: Child Maintenance: How Much Should the State Require Fathers to Pay When Families Separate?, (2013). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2321788.
466.
Skinner, C.: Child Maintenance Reforms: Understanding Fathers’ Expressive Agency and the Power of Reciprocity. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 27, 242–265 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/ebt005.
467.
Strengthening Families, Promoting Parental Responsibility: the future of child maintenance Cm 7990, https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/strengthening-families-promoting-parental-responsibility-the-future-of-child-maintenance, (2011).
468.
Henshaw, D.: Recovering Child Support: routes to responsibility, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/recovering-child-support-routes-to-responsibility, (2006).
469.
Diduck, A.: Chapter 7. In: Law’s families. LexisNexis, London (2003).
470.
Wikeley, N.: Private Cases and the Child Support Agency. Family law. 31, (2001).
471.
Collier, R.: The Campaign Against the Child Support Act: ‘Errant Fathers and Family Men’. Family law. 24, 384–387 (1994).
472.
Alison Diduck: The Unmodified Family: The Child Support Act and the Construction of Legal Subjects. Journal of Law and Society. 22, 527–548 (1995).
473.
MACLEAN, M., EEKELAAR, J.: CHILD SUPPORT: THE BRITISH SOLUTION. ‘International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family’. 7, 205–229 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/7.2.205.
474.
Altman, S.: A Theory of Child Support. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family. 17, 173–210 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1093/lawfam/17.2.173.