[1]
Ali Madanipour 2003. Personal space of the body. Public and private spaces of the city. Routledge. 6–38.
[2]
Allen, S. and Wolkowitz, C. 1987. Approaches to homeworking. Homeworking: myths and realities. Macmillan Education. 10–29.
[3]
Anderson , B. 2000. Dr Jekyll and Mrs Hyde: defining domestic work. Doing the dirty work?: the global politics of domestic labour. Zed Books. 9–27.
[4]
Bell, D. and Valentine , G. 1997. Home. Consuming geographies: we are where we eat. Routledge. 60–87.
[5]
Bondi, L. 1998. Gender, class and urban space: public and private space in contemporary urban landscapes. Urban Geography. 19, 2 (Feb. 1998), 160–185. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.19.2.160.
[6]
Boys, J. and Matrix 1984. House design and women’s roles. Making space: women and the man-made environment. Pluto Press. 55–80.
[7]
Casteras, S. 1987. Of Queens’ gardens" and the model Victorian lady. Images of Victorian womanhood in English art. Associate University Presses. 50–73.
[8]
Cockburn, C. and First-Dilić, R. 1994. Introduction: Looking for the Gender-Technology Relation. Bringing technology home: gender and technology in a changing Europe. Open University Press. 1–21.
[9]
Cohen, Deborah 2006. Cathedrals to commerce: shoppers and entrepreneurs. Household gods: the British and their possessions. Yale University Press. 32–62.
[10]
Cowan, R.S. 1983. The roads not taken: alternative social and technical approaches to housework. More work for mother: the ironies of household technology from the open hearth to the microwave. Basic Books. 102-150-241–245.
[11]
Daniels, C.R. 1989. Between home and factory: homeworkers and the state. Homework: historical and contemporary perspectives on paid labor at home. University of Illinois Press. 13–32.
[12]
Davidoff , L. 1990. The rationalisation of housework. Sexual divisions revisited. Macmillan published in association with the British Sociological Association. 59–94.
[13]
Davidoff, L. 1995. Landscape with figures: home and community in English society. Worlds between: historical perspectives on gender and class. Polity Press. 41–72.
[14]
Davidoff, L. 1998. Regarding some ’old husbands’ tales’: public and private in feminist history. Feminism, the public and the private. Oxford University Press. 164–194.
[15]
Davidoff, L. and Hall, C. 2002. My own fireside: the creation of the middle-class home. Family fortunes: [men and women of the English middle class, 1780-1850]. Routledge. 357–396.
[16]
Davidson , C. 1982. Women’s Attitudes to Housework. A woman’s work is never done: a history of housework in the British Isles 1650-1950. Chatto & Windus.
[17]
Duncan, N. 1996. Negotiating gender and sexuality in public and private spaces. Body space: destabilising geographies of gender and sexuality. Routledge. 127–145.
[18]
Fassinger, P. 1993. Meanings of housework for single fathers and mothers. Men, work, and family. Sage Publications. 195–216.
[19]
Gamarnikow, E. and Purvis, J. 1983. Introduction. The Public and the private. Heinemann. 1–6.
[20]
Giles, J. 2004. Legacies: the question of ‘home’ and women’s modernity. The parlour and the suburb: domestic identities, class, femininity and modernity. Berg. 141–165.
[21]
Gill Valentine 1990. Women’s fear and the design of public space. Built environment. 16, 4 (1990), 288–303.
[22]
Gillis, J. 1997. No place like home. A world of their own making: a history of myth and ritual in family life. Oxford University Press. 109–128.
[23]
Godard , F. 1985. How do ways of life change? Beyond employment: household, gender and subsistence. Blackwell. 317–337.
[24]
Gregson, N. and Lowe, M. 2008. Renegotiating the domestic division of labour? A study of dual career households in north east and south east England. The Sociological Review. 41, 3 (Jun. 2008), 475–505. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1993.tb00074.x.
[25]
Gregson, N. and Lowe, M. 1994. Theoretical and political reflections. Servicing the middle classes: class, gender and waged domestic labour in contemporary Britain. Routledge. 231–241.
[26]
Hayden, D. 1981. Community Kitchens and cooked food services. The grand domestic revolution: a history of feminist designs for American homes, neighborhoods, and cities. MIT Press. 206–227.
[27]
Heynen, H. 2005. Modernity and domesticity:tensions and contradictions. Negotiating domesticity: spatial productions of gender in modern architecture. Routledge. 1–29.
[28]
Honig, E.A. 1997. Space of gender in seventeenth-century Dutch painting. Looking at seventeenth-century Dutch art: realism reconsidered. Cambridge University Press. 187–201.
[29]
Hooks, B. 1990. Homeplace: a site of resistance. Yearning: race, gender, and culture. Between the Lines. 41–49.
[30]
Hunt , P. 1989. Gender and the constuction of home life. Home and family: creating the domestic sphere. Palgrave. 66–81.
[31]
Johnston, L. and Valentine , G. 1994. Wherever I lay my girlfriend, thats my home: the performance and surveillance of lesbian identities in domestic environments. Mapping desire: geographies of sexualities. Routledge. 99–113.
[32]
Linda J. Nicholson 1989. Feminist theory: the private and the public. Beyond domination: new perspectives on women and philosophy. Rowman & Littlefield. 221–230.
[33]
Little et. al. , J. 1988. Introduction: geography and gender in the urban environment. Women in cities: gender and the urban environment. Macmillan Education. 1–20.
[34]
Madigan, R. et al. 1990. Gender and the meaning of the home. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 14, 4 (Dec. 1990), 625–647. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.1990.tb00160.x.
[35]
Mary Romero 1992. Bonds of sisterhood - bonds of oppression. Maid in the U.S.A. Routledge. 97–133.
[36]
McDowell, L. 1999. Home, place and identity. Gender, identity and place: understanding feminist geographies. Polity. 71–95.
[37]
McDowell, L. and Pringle, R. 1992. Defining public and private issues. Defining women: Social institutions and gender divisions. Polity Press. 9–17.
[38]
McDowell, Linda 2009. Up close and personal: intimate work in the home. Working bodies: interactive service employment and workplace identities. Wiley-Blackwell. 79–98.
[39]
McNay, Lois 2000. Gender, subjectification and agency: introductory remarks. Gender and agency: reconfiguring the subject in feminist and social theory. Polity Press. 1–21.
[40]
Monk , J. 1992. Gender in the landscape: expression of power and meaning. Inventing places: studies in cultural geography. Wiley. 124–137.
[41]
Oakley, A. 1974. Socialization and self-concept. The sociology of housework. Martin Robertson. 113–134.
[42]
Phil Hubbard 2005. Women outdoors : destabilizing the public / private dichotomy. A companion to feminist geography. Blackwell. 322–333.
[43]
Pollock, G. 1988. Modernity and the spaces of femininity. Vision and difference: femininity, feminism and histories of art. Routledge. 50–90.
[44]
Pratt, G. 1998. Geographic metaphors in feminist theory. Making worlds: gender, metaphor, materiality. University of Arizona Press. 13–30.
[45]
Prugl, E. 1999. Motherly women-breadwinning men: industrial homework and the construction of western welfare states. The global construction of gender: home-based work in the political economy of the 20th century. Columbia University Press. 25–55.
[46]
Reed , C. 1996. Introduction: not at home. Not at home: the suppression of domesticity in modern art and architecture. Thames and Hudson. 7–17.
[47]
Rivas, L.M. 2003. Invisible labours: caring for the independent person. Global woman: nannies, maids and sex workers in the new economy. Granta Books. 70–84.
[48]
Rose , G. 1993. Women and everyday spaces. Feminism and geography: the limits of geographical knowledge. Polity Press. 17–40.
[49]
Rybczynski, W. 1986. Domesticity . Home: a short history of an idea. Viking. 51–75.
[50]
Sibley, D. 2005. Private/public. Cultural geography: a critical dictionary of key concepts. I.B. Tauris. 155–160.
[51]
Soja, E.M. 1996. Increasing the openness of thirdspace. Thirdspace: journeys to Los Angeles and other real-and-imagined places. Blackwell. 106–144.
[52]
Sutton, P.C. 1988. The domestic life of women. Pieter de Hooch, 1629-1684. Dulwich Picture Gallery, Wadsworth Atheneum in association with Yale University Press. 68–75.
[53]
Thorne , B. 1992. Feminist rethinking the family: an overview. Rethinking the family: some feminist questions. Northeastern University Press. 1-21, – 24.
[54]
Thornton , M. 1995. The Cartography of Public and Private. Public and private: feminist legal debates. Oxford University Press. 2–16.
[55]
Tosh, J. 1999. The ideal of domesticity. A man’s place: masculinity and the middle-class home in Victorian England. Yale University Press. 27–50.
[56]
Wolff, J. 2006. Gender and the haunting of cities (or, the retirement of the flaneur). The invisible flâneuse?: gender, public space, and visual culture in nineteenth-century Paris. Manchester University Press. 18–31.